“I wanna tell you Gorsuch, I wanna tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
Imagine for a second if Trump had literally called out the names of Democrats and suggested that they needed to "pay the price" for supporting the Biden win? Then those specific congresspeople were singled out and attacked?
14 comments:
Scott, unfortunately we are seeing things like never before and we should not make it harder by being so political 🙄.
He was offended by his support to reverse Roe v Wade.
But white a white supremacist killed black people in Buffalo shooting.
We can increase the age limit and Red Flag laws
This just happened
WASHINGTON (AP) — The House passed a wide-ranging gun control bill Wednesday in response to recent mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas, that would raise the age limit for purchasing a semi-automatic rifle and prohibit the sale of ammunition magazines with a capacity of more than 15 rounds.
The legislation passed by a mostly party-line vote of 223-204. It has almost no chance of becoming law as the Senate pursues negotiations focused on improving mental health programs, bolstering school security and enhancing background checks.
But maybe 🤔
The bills would raise the legal purchasing age for semi-automatic rifles from 18 to 21 and ban the import, sale, manufacture, transfer or possession of large-capacity magazines, among other provisions.It would also establish requirements to regulate the storage of firearms on residential premises and create criminal penalties for violations.
What to watch: With the House action all but certain to fail in the Senate, a bipartisan group of senators is instead focused on crafting a gun control deal that can pass the chamber — even if it means compromising, Axios' Alayna Treene reports.
It would need 10 Republicans
This is why I believe that fox is dangerous. But legally
Alleged attempt to kill Kavanaugh follows months of heated rhetoric from Democrats'This moment has to be a call to arms,' Chicago mayor tweeted May 9
By Jessica Chasmar | Fox News
Not one msm said like that
Of Course Schumer incited.
He will never be investigated and charged.
He has "Democrat Privilege".
Gun Ownership among Blacks has been rising.
An excellent development for America's Future.
Late on Tuesday, a federal judge in California overruled attorney John Eastman’s privilege claims on more than a quarter of the 599 files at issue. Eastman must produce them to the committee by 2 p.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, a little more than a day before the hearing begins.
As in March, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter invoked the crime-fraud exception in his ruling. The judge noted that he previously found that former President Donald Trump and Eastman “likely committed obstruction of an official proceeding […] and conspiracy to defraud the United States.” Neither of the men has been charged with a crime, and the judge’s finding came during a civil dispute.
In the latest ruling, Judge Carter amended the timeline when the alleged plot became “actionable” nearly a month before the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“The previously disclosed documents indicate that Dr. Eastman and President Trump’s plan to disrupt the Joint Session was fully formed and actionable as early as December 7, 2020,” the ruling states. “On that day, Dr. Eastman forwarded a memo explaining why January 6 was the ‘Hard Deadline’ that was ‘critical to the result of this election’ for the Trump Campaign. A week later, on December 13, President Trump’s personal attorney received a more robust analysis of January 6’s significance, which was potentially ‘the first time members of President Trump’s team transformed a legal interpretation of the Electoral Count Act into a day-by-day plan of action.'”
"The Trump legal team chose not to seek recourse in court—instead, they forged ahead with a political campaign to disrupt the electoral count,” the ruling notes. “Lawyers are free not to bring cases; they are not free to evade judicial review to overturn a democratic election.”
The judge also rejected Eastman’s First Amendment objections to a subset of documents involving meetings with a conservative group. Two of their meetings included an agenda titled: “GROUND GAME following Nov 4 Election Results.”
Despite acknowledging that Eastman articulated “legitimate concerns” about his right to associate, Carter found that disclosure of 10 of the documents is “narrowly tailored to the government’s asserted interest.”
Eastman’s attorney Charles Burnham noted that the mixed ruling also cut in his favor on some of the disputed issues, including on certain First Amendment claims.
“The Court upheld Dr. Eastman’s claims of privilege over 440 of the 599 documents at issue,” Burnham wrote in a statement to Law&Crime. “The Court also upheld in part Dr. Eastman’s argument that certain of the materials sought by the January 6th committee were protected by the First Amendment. The decision represents the first time a federal court has held that the January 6th committee’s activities infringe on First Amendment freedoms.”
Burnham also emphasized that the sole instance where the judge applied the crime-fraud exception was under a civil, not a criminal standard. He also claimed that his client addressed “significant evidence of illegality and fraud” in the 2020 election, a proposition rejected unanimously more than 60 times in the courts and over several audits and recounts.
The Jan. 6 Committee did not immediately respond to Law&Crime’s email requesting comment.
Even more than before
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is in talks with the Jan. 6 committee to testify publicly, according to multiple people familiar with the matter.
Raffensperger, a Republican and Georgia’s top elections official, withstood pressure from then-President Donald Trump, in a now-infamous Jan. 2, 2021 call, to “find” enough votes to ensure the president’s victory in the state, and he vigorously defended the integrity of Georgia’s election.
Raffensperger’s appearance would likely accompany testimony from other state and local election officials who have discussed threats and pressure to support Trump’s bogus claims of fraud and would come as the panel is starting to present its findings in public hearings. But Raffensperger’s account is likely to be the most direct evidence of Trump’s personal engagement in his effort to flip the results of the election. That effort is also under scrutiny from local prosecutors.
Raffensperger, who handily won a primary campaign against a Trump-backed adversary last month, testified before a special grand jury just days ago as part of the Fulton County district attorney’s investigation into Trump’s Georgia election pressure. It’s one of the most significant legal threats facing the former president, and Raffensperger’s testimony could also play a crucial role in any potential charging decisions.
Since taking office, Biden has had a number of hard-won victories, largely eclipsed by anxiety over inflation and rising costs.
Congress passed a $1.9tn Covid-19 relief package that slashed poverty and sent him a $1.2tn infrastructure package approved with bipartisan support. The administration’s mass vaccination campaign has resulted in nearly 67% of Americans being fully immunized against Covid-19, with shots for children younger than five potentially available within the coming weeks. He filled a record number of federal judicial vacancies during his first year and successfully nominated the first Black woman to supreme court justice.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the economy continues to grow, with unemployment at record lows and consumer spending robust. On Friday, it was reported that 390,000 more jobs were created.
“Biden has done a very good job with things over which he can use the levers of the presidency and the levers of the government to do it,” Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said, noting the consequential exception of the Afghanistan exit. “But there are many things happening now where there simply are no levers.”
The tools for combating inflation – voters’ top priority – rest largely with the Fed, not the president. Still, rising costs have become a major political liability for Biden ahead of the November elections, as the administration faces sharp criticism for wrongly predicting inflation would probably be “transitory”.
Biden policies began pushing costs higher his first week in office. He needs to man up and take responsibility.
Bidenomics have pushed more Americans into poverty.
"February 2022, with a 14.4 percent"
Up from 11.4% when Biden took Office.
Alky is always so spectacularly wrong.
"consumer spending robust"
My how he is so void of knowledge.
"Consumer spending contracted 26.7 per cent year-on-year in May,2022"
Of course Schumer was only saying that a price will be paid politically by those who support the overthrowing of Roe vs. Wade. He didn't call for a march on the SCOTUS building.
Post a Comment