Why are liberals so dumb?

There was never any "right" to an abortion, there is not a single law that will be overturned anywhere, and the court did not "legislate" from the bench.

How do you know you lost an argument? When you have lie, misrepresent, or use rhetoric rather than come up with a logical argument. I get that this is an "emotional" subject, but being overly emotional does not make your argument any more valid. In fact, it generally means your argument is missing something substantial. 

What I have heard from pro-choicers for the most part is emotional arguments that we have heard a thousand times before. It really doesn't matter how emotional you are, how strongly you feel, or how long you have held a belief.  The idea that abortion was a "privacy" right (when you cannot find that same privacy argument regarding smoking a joint in your own home) was not, is not, and never will be a good argument. Under the same logic, one could offer that there is a privacy concern for almost all actions (even many that are currently illegal). 

To be clear, the original decision was one where the result was predetermined and the court had to simply come up with a legal reasoning to justify it. This happens quite a bit I suppose, but in some cases the "reach" that is required to get to that predetermined position is longer than other times. There is little question that scholars from both sides of the philosophical debate agreed that the merits of Roe were lacking in an extreme fashion. The issue (for many) was to simply demand Judges "promise" them not to use actual legal reasoning if it came down to it. They wanted the bad decision "protected". 

I have no issue with someone who will come out accept that this was going to happen eventually and that we need to work as a country to comes up with a solution. What I take issue with are those who demand that this was nefarious, unjustified, and ruled based on bad judgement. 

At the end of the day, this is a Republic with a whole ton of differing opinions on a whole ton of subjects. Why is it that certain people feel the need to literally "control" the actions of everyone else everywhere else. If California and their residents want to allow the killing of a baby up until the point the doctor slaps the ass and it starts to breath, well then... that is California. If Missouri wants to ban abortions for any reason other than health, well that is their right as well.  

If we want to get together as a country as a whole and actually legislate something, then both sides need to understand that the country is neither going to follow California or Missouri. They are going to want a compromise that satisfies the most people, while likely pissing off the 20% of the zealots on either side.