The alky, being his usual fucking moron* self, fell for this hook, line and sinker:
Axios: Justice Clarence Thomas ‘suggests’ COVID vaccines are made with aborted children; NBC News too; Politico also
As someone suggested in the replies, either Justice Clarence Thomas has changed his pronouns to “they/them” or he’s just reading something presented by the plaintiffs, as Axios reports:
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested Thursday in a dissenting opinion that coronavirus vaccines were developed using “aborted children.”
…
“They object on religious grounds to all available COVID–19 vaccines because they were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children,” Thomas wrote in his dissent, referring to the plaintiffs that brought the lawsuit.
Referring to the plaintiffs that brought the lawsuit. So there’s nothing here to suggest that’s Thomas’ belief.
Former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson received at least one message tacitly warning her not to cooperate with the House January 6 select committee from an associate of former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
The message in question was the second of the two warnings that the select committee disclosed at the end of its special hearing when Hutchinson testified about how Donald Trump directed a crowd he knew was armed to march on the Capitol, the sources said.
“[A person] let me know you have your deposition tomorrow. He wants me to let you know that he’s thinking about you. He knows you’re loyal, and you’re going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition,” read the message. The redaction was Meadows, the sources said.
The message was presented during closing remarks at the special hearing with Hutchinson by the panel’s vice-chair Liz Cheney, who characterized the missive as improper pressure on a crucial witness that could extend to illegal witness tampering or intimidation.
The exact identity of the person who sent Hutchinson the message – beyond the fact that they were an associate of Meadows – could not be confirmed on Thursday, but that may be in part because the select committee may wish to interview that person, the sources said.
That appears to indicate that the person who sent the message was a close associate of the former White House chief of staff who may themselves be a fact witness to what Trump and Meadows were doing and thinking ahead of the Capitol attack.
Neither a spokesman for Meadows nor Hutchinson responded to a request for comment Thursday evening.
The other message was also directed at Hutchinson, the sources said; the quote displayed on the slide was one of several calls from Trump allies that Hutchinson recounted to House investigators.
“What they said to me is, as long as I continue to be a teamplayer, they know that I’m on the team, I’m doing the right thing, I’m protecting who I need to protect, you know, I’ll continue to stay in the good graces in Trump World,” the slide read.
“And they reminded me a couple of times that Trump does read transcripts and just to keep that in mind as I proceeded through my depositions and interviews with the committee.”
The identity of the people who called Hutchinson, warning her presumably not to implicate the former president, could not be established beyond the fact that they were people close to Trump, though the select committee is understood to be aware of all of the people.
Politico, which first reported that the message to Hutchinson came from an associate of Meadows, also reported that it came before her second interview with the select committee. Hutchinson changed lawyers before her fourth deposition that preceded her public testimony.
On the next hearing, we will see the John Dean of the Trump administration.
The House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack issued a subpoena on Wednesday to the former Trump White House counsel Pat Cipollone, compelling him to testify about at least three parts of Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
The subpoena marked a dramatic escalation for the panel and showed its resolve in seeking to obtain inside information about how the former president sought to return himself to office from the unique perspective of the White House counsel’s office.
“Mr Cipollone repeatedly raised legal and other concerns about President Trump’s activities on January 6 and in the days that preceded,” the chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, said in a statement accompanying the subpoena.
July 1, 2022 at 3:50 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 4 Comments
Mark Joseph Stern: “No single day has better captured the current state of the Supreme Court than Thursday. At 10 a.m., the court issued a devastating assault on the Biden administration’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases in a 6–3 ruling joined by all of the court’s reactionary block. Ten minutes later, it issued a 5–4 opinion that just barely confirmed that the president, rather than a rogue judge in Texas, has authority over border policy, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh lending the lone votes preventing an absolutely insane outcome. Shortly thereafter, the court issued a bombshell orders list that tees up, for next term, one of the most important and dangerous democracy cases in American history, which asks whether state legislatures have near-unlimited authority over election laws.”
“The court’s most immediately lethal decision remains Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. But do not let Dobbs distract from the onslaught that followed it.”
So her testimony has been completely debunked and refuted. This committee has become a laughingstock and cheney a useful idiot for Pelosi hatred of trump.
The three agents do not dispute that Trump was furious that the agents would not take him to the Capitol.
Even after the car returned Trump to the West Wing, he still wouldn’t let go of wanting to reach the Capitol.
“When we got back to the White House, he said he wanted to physically walk with the marchers, and according to my notes, he then said he’d be fine with just riding the Beast,” former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in videotaped testimony to the committee, referring to the nickname for the fortified presidential limo. “He wanted to be a part of the march in some fashion.”
Trump was furious with Meadows for failing to make the trip happen, Hutchinson testified that Meadows told her. By the time they were back in the West Wing, the televisions were showing live coverage of the rioters overpowering police and getting closer to the Capitol’s doors and windows. Hutchinson testified that she entered Meadows’s office and asked him if he was watching.
“The rioters are getting really close,” she recalled asking the chief of staff. “Have you talked to the president?”
“No,” Meadows answered, while scrolling and texting on his phone, according to Hutchinson’s testimony, “he wants to be alone right now.”
Toward the end of 2020, then-President Donald Trump began raising a new idea with aides: that he would personally lead a march to the Capitol on the following Jan. 6.
Trump brought it up repeatedly with key advisers in the Oval Office, according to a person who talked with him about it. The president told others he wanted a dramatic, made-for-TV moment that could pressure Republican lawmakers to support his demand to throw out the electoral college results showing that Joe Biden had defeated him, the person said.
The excursion that almost happened came into clearer focus this week, as the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 presented explosive testimony and records detailing Trump’s fervent demands to lead his supporters mobbing the seat of government. Though Trump’s trip was ultimately thwarted by his own security officers, the new evidence cuts closer to the critical question of what he knew about the violence in store for that day.
Making the congress actually fucking legislate rather than allowing an alphabet agency full of nameless, faceless bureaucrats to simply impose punitive and draconian "climate" regulations on the nation with no legislation or congressional oversight.
Iow's... Giving the people a voice and a vote via their elected representatives.
I'm literally shaking right now.
It's shit like this which demands that we pack the court with several dozen demonstrably 'progressive' Justices so the people never, ever have a voice again via their elected representatives.
Donald Trump’s former aide Cassidy Hutchinson was warned by an associate of the former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows not to cooperate with the House January 6 select committee, two sources familiar with the matter have said.
LMAO at you again rat as the anonymous sources you used the other day are now dog shit....Too bad Cassidy has a bigger see of balls then you do....most amusing for a man with many guns to enhance his egollllll..>>BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA
Jan. 6. The Jan. 6 select committee will have at least two more hearings this month, and we know how much political oxygen these suck up. The select committee has subpoenaed former White House counsel Pat Cipollone for a deposition next week, but that issue may end up in court. Panel members have a final report to issue, and they also must decide whether to make any criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, including potentially for former President Donald Trump. There’s lots of action on this front, and it will steal headlines for most of the month.
Quote of the Day July 1, 2022 at 7:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 6 Comments
“When you try to overthrow the will of the people, and you try a coup in the United States government, you have to pay for that. Period.” — Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), on Late Night.
A Withering Indictment of the Entire GOP July 1, 2022 at 1:45 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 16 Comments
Peter Wehner: “However this plays out, this needs to be said: For the past half-dozen years, the Republican Party and the American right—with a very few honorable exceptions— stood with Trump, defended him, and attacked his critics. Some went silent in the face of his indecency and lawlessness; many others gleefully promulgated his lies and conspiracy theories. Together they attempted to annihilate truth on his behalf, in his name, for their party, to seize and to hold power.
“Some comfort themselves by saying that they went along for the ride so they could promote their policy agenda. Others were afraid to speak up. Still others did it for ratings and money. Some Trump supporters were true believers. Some rationalized their deal with the (figurative) devil; others were more transparent and more cynical…
“No matter; the die is cast when it comes to the Trump presidency and those who made it possible. The events of January 6 were, in their own twisted way, a fitting denouement for the Trump presidency. It was so obvious, for so long, that this wouldn’t end well. Trump was the primary architect of the attack on the citadel of American democracy. But he had a lot of help along the way.
Justice Department Blindsided by This Week’s Testimony July 1, 2022 at 4:06 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 100 Comments
David Rhode: “Hutchinson’s testimony astonished Justice Department prosecutors as much as it did the viewing public, the Times reported. It also blindsided them. The committee gave no advance warning of Hutchinson’s statements to department prosecutors, who have spent months investigating the assault. The prosecutors don’t have access to videos and transcripts of hours of testimony that Hutchinson has provided to the committee behind closed doors.
“A rift appears to be opening between Congress and the D.O.J. Earlier this month, four top Justice Department officials sent a letter to the committee criticizing it for not sharing transcripts from the thousand-plus interviews it has conducted.”
SO LET THE DOJ GET A LOT MORE AGGRESSIVE IN ITS OWN INVESTIGATION OF ALL THIS.
The Most Hopeless Day of the SCOTUS Term July 1, 2022 at 3:50 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 7 Comments
Mark Joseph Stern: “No single day has better captured the current state of the Supreme Court than Thursday. At 10 a.m., the court issued a devastating assault on the Biden administration’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases in a 6–3 ruling joined by all of the court’s reactionary block.
"Ten minutes later, it issued a 5–4 opinion that just barely confirmed that the president, rather than a rogue judge in Texas, has authority over border policy, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh lending the lone votes preventing an absolutely insane outcome. Shortly thereafter, the court issued a bombshell orders list that tees up, for next term, one of the most important and dangerous democracy cases in American history, which asks whether state legislatures have near-unlimited authority over election laws.
“The court’s most immediately lethal decision remains Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. But do not let Dobbs distract from the onslaught that followed it.”
REPUBLIAN OVERREACH. TIME FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO RISE UP AND RECLAIM DEMOCRACY AND REAL ELECTIONS FOR THEMSELVES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
Abortion Rights Grow as Priorities July 1, 2022 at 3:14 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 3 Comments
A new AP-NORC poll “finds a growing percentage of Americans calling out abortion or women’s rights as priorities for the government in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, especially among Democrats and those who support abortion access.”
“With midterm elections looming, President Joe Biden and Democrats will seek to capitalize on that shift.”
Hutchinson is unique in history. Who else can claim to have wiped from a White House wall ketchup thrown there by an American PINO (President In Name Only).
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there by a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there by a PINO? (President In Name Only)
“A global central bank effort to fight inflation is driving rising recession fears that have given Wall Street the worst half of the year since 1970,” says Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda. “Added volatility from the final trading day of the quarter is especially crazy because so many investors are rebalancing their portfolios with recession stocks.”
SURPRISING FACT
It took the stock market just 161 days to fall from its peak in January to a 20% decline threshold in June—well below the average time of 245 days in past bear markets, according to data from CFRA Research. Some experts say that could well be “good news” for markets, as a quicker descent into a bear market often tends to mean more “shallow” declines followed by an eventual rebound.
Earth shaking like was his hand on the wheel and did the other hand go to the clavical area of the agent who grabbed the first hand?
I'm more interested in whether he wanted the mags turned off so armed insurrectionts could get into the Ellipse before he sent them to march on the Capitol Building.
Forced again to skirt censorship, honest pastor
said...
Have handwriting experts looked into that note yet?
Of course, it would be VERY important whether she wrote the note or the man she said dictated it to her.
That would be earth shaking.
Earth shaking like did Trump's hand go to the wheel and did his other hand go to the clavical area of the agent who grabbed that hand?
I'm more interested in whether he wanted the mags turned off so armed insurrectionts could get into the Ellipse before he sent them to march on the Capitol Building.
* maybe if the committee ever let the 14,000 hours of available video out we could find them among the people singing America the Beautiful or God Bless America.
The End of the Federal Government as We Know It July 1, 2022 at 8:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 59 Comments
Heather Cox Richardson: “In the past, the Supreme Court has operated on the basis of ‘stare decisis,’ which literally means ‘to stand by things decided.’ The purpose of that principle is to make changes incrementally so the law stays consistent and evenly applied, which promotes social stability. On occasion, the court does break precedent, notably in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision, which overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that rubber stamped racial segregation. When that sort of a major change happens, both the court and elected officials work hard to explain that they are changing the law to make it more in line with our Constitution, and to move people along with that change.”
“With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision of last Friday, the court simply tore up 49 years of law and history, ending federal recognition of a constitutional right Americans have enjoyed since 1973.”
“Today, the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency reversed almost 100 years of jurisprudence by arguing that Congress cannot delegate authority on ‘major questions’ to agencies in the executive branch.”
The End of the Federal Government as We Know It July 1, 2022 at 8:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 59 Comments
Heather Cox Richardson: “In the past, the Supreme Court has operated on the basis of ‘stare decisis,’ which literally means ‘to stand by things decided.’ The purpose of that principle is to make changes incrementally so the law stays consistent and evenly applied, which promotes social stability. On occasion, the court does break precedent, notably in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision, which overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that rubber stamped racial segregation. When that sort of a major change happens, both the court and elected officials work hard to explain that they are changing the law to make it more in line with our Constitution, and to move people along with that change.”
“With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision of last Friday, the court simply tore up 49 years of law and history, ending federal recognition of a constitutional right Americans have enjoyed since 1973.”
“Today, the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency reversed almost 100 years of jurisprudence by arguing that Congress cannot delegate authority on ‘major questions’ to agencies in the executive branch.”
Megyn Kelly: ‘First-year law student’ could discredit Cassidy Hutchinson testimony
Megyn Kelly was the first journalist to go hard after Donald Trump in a 2016 presidential debate.
But now she’s on his side.
On “The Megyn Kelly Show” on Thursday, the former Fox News and NBC News correspondent poured scorn on the dramatic testimony at the Jan. 6 special committee by former White House staffer Cassidy Hutchinson.
“A first-year law student could have driven a truck through the holes in that testimonial,” said Ms. Kelly, who has a law-school degree.
Anonymous Myballsinthewoodsagain said... All the spamming doesn't change the fact that the people who were there say she is either mistaken or lying.
BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!! That's all you fucking assholes have.....claim without a shred of proof she is lying.....It Is the Trumpian GOP way scream louder to make your guy look good.....anyone who doubts trumps doesn't have a propensity to act like a petulant child throwing things around are sadly delusional!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
The force of the Supreme Court's right turn has shaken the country By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer Updated 1 hour ago Jul 1, 2022 (CNN) - The Supreme Court reached into every corner of American life, reordering intimate family choices, breaching the separation of church and state, and diminishing the steps government can take to prevent gun violence or protect the environment. The upheaval of the past several weeks, especially as the court outright ended a half-century of women's privacy rights, is unmatched in modern times. The speed and sweep by which the right-wing majority acted reflects, as one liberal dissenter wrote, a "restless and newly constituted Court." And it is not finished. The conservative supermajority -- anchored by three relatively young appointees of former President Donald Trump -- is positioned to continue its impact with disputes next session over the Voting Rights Act, affirmative action and religious objections to LGBTQ protections. Yet it will be the epic 2021-22 session that stands out over time. The case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, reversing Roe v. Wade, will likely be remembered as one of the most far-reaching rulings in Supreme Court history. The 5-4 decision marked the first-ever complete reversal of a constitutional right. The justices also enlarged the Second Amendment, favoring gun owners, and redefined the balance between the First Amendment's prohibition against government "establishment of religion" and its "free exercise." That will allow more prayer in public settings and require more government money for religious education. The new landscape was made possible because of the three Trump appointees -- Neil Gorsuch, age 54, Brett Kavanaugh, 57, and Amy Coney Barrett, 50. They separated themselves from prior Republican-named justices who had adhered to precedent and "the promise of constancy," as Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy and David Souter called it in the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirmed Roe. The drive to the right was not wholly unexpected, even though its force has shaken the country. When liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September 2020 and Trump quickly replaced her with Barrett, the new six-justice right-wing bloc appeared positioned to roll back decades of individual rights and government power. . When the three liberals, including Breyer, dissented in the Dobbs abortion case, they recalled a lament of Breyer's from 2007 as he dissented from a decision striking down school reintegration plans: "It is not often in the law that so few have so quickly changed so much." "So few" are now -- as a supermajority -- more aptly "so many." The swift pace of such great change has been staggering. Dissenters tried, in vain, to hold on to precedent that went back half a century in the abortion rights and religious liberties controversies. In the EPA case, they clung to a recent precedent, a 2007 case in which the high court recognized the EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide and to address environmental crises. "But that Court," wrote Kagan, "was not this Court."
CLAIM: If it weren’t for this ballot collection scheme, former President Donald Trump would have had enough votes to win the 2020 election.
THE FACTS: This alleged scheme has not been proven, nor do these researchers have any way of knowing whether any ballots that were collected contained votes for Trump or for Biden.
There’s no evidence a massive ballot harvesting scheme dumped a large amount of votes for one candidate into drop boxes, and if there were, it would likely be caught quickly, according to Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Iowa.
“Once you get just a few people involved, people start to reveal the scheme because it unravels pretty quickly,” he said.
Absentee ballots are also verified by signature and tracked closely, often with an option for voters themselves to see where their ballot is at any given time. That process safeguards against anyone who tries to illegally cast extra ballots, according to Barry Burden, a University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor and the director of the Elections Research Project.
“It seems impossible in that system for a nefarious actor to dump lots of ballots that were never requested by voters and were never issued by election officials,” Burden said.
Holy shit batman......Trump loses the extremely conservative Washington Examiner which says he couldn't be a dog shit cleaner up!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Something Stinks in Colorado How did an unknown candidate with no following and no money tie with Tina Peters in a GOP primary?
According to the State of Colorado — and The Associated Press and the New York Times! — the official results for the GOP primary race for Secretary of State have Pam Anderson winning with 43% of the total vote, and Tina Peters second with 28% — but the real story was that Australian businessman Mike O’Donnell had picked up 28% himself, and might actually beat Tina Peters too.
I wanted to know more about Mike O’Donnell because I had never heard of Mike O’Donnell. In the most high-profile race in America for the office of Secretary of State, a candidate who had become a national political figure, who had the highest name recognition, who outraised both of her opponents by 3 to 1, who spoke at rallies with President Trump, who was the obvious frontrunner — that person didn’t just lose, but she tied with a guy who had none of those things in a GOP primary.
I didn’t even know that Mike O’Donnell was running in the race until I saw the race results. How did an unknown candidate like Mike O’Donnell manage to garner as many votes as a national political figure like Tina Peters?
This question, ladies and gentlemen, is what leads you down the rabbit hole of America’s bogus election system.
I went looking, in other words, for Mike O’Donnell’s 170,000 supporters in Colorado.
I didn’t find them on Facebook — only 193 people were following his campaign page.
Mike O’Donnell’s 170,000 supporters were not hiding on Twitter either — just 560 of them were following his campaign at all. The day before the election, his last tweet managed to get 4 “likes.”
That’s the most interaction that his campaign Twitter account got — ever.
Mike O’Donnell sent out 1,306 tweets on his account and the vast majority of them got: 0 Likes — and 0 Retweets — and 0 Comments. There was no interaction on his Twitter account because nobody was voting for Mike O’Donnell.
How about fundraising? According to Colorado Public Radio News, Mike O’Donnell had managed to raise $4,700 for his campaign three weeks before the primary.
And yet on election day, Mike O’Donnell got nearly a third of the total vote and over 600,000 people voted in that race. More than 170,000 Colorado voters suddenly appear out of nowhere for Mike O’Donnell.
So many people suddenly appear for Mike O’Donnell that he actually wins 17 counties in Colorado.
Mike O’Donnell is the outright winner in Jackson County (43%) and Rio Blanco County (37%) and Conejos County (41%) and Fremont County (34%) and Las Animas County (36%) and Prowers County (37%) and Bent County (34%) and Otero County (40%) and Kiowa County (38%) and Lincoln County (39%) and Cheyenne County (40%) and Kit Carson County (42%) and Yuma County (43%) and Washington County (40%) and Morgan County (38%) and Phillips County (34%) and Sedgwick County (38%) according to the New York Times . continues: https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/something-stinks-in-colorado
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said... The force of the Supreme Court's right turn has shaken the country By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer
Just think Alky, you’ll be worm food before this court changes
“I don’t fucking care they have weapons. Let my people in. They aren’t here to hurt me. Take the magnetometers away” and “they can march to the Capitol after the rally is over.”
The January 6th committee keeps talking about the election, but has not shown the numerous videos of people making multiple trips to stuff ballots into boxes in the middle of the night. Weird.
July 1, 2022 at 8:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 136 Comments
Heather Cox Richardson: “In the past, the Supreme Court has operated on the basis of ‘stare decisis,’ which literally means ‘to stand by things decided.’ The purpose of that principle is to make changes incrementally so the law stays consistent and evenly applied, which promotes social stability. On occasion, the court does break precedent, notably in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision, which overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that rubber stamped racial segregation. When that sort of a major chanPge happens, both the court and elected officials work hard to explain that they are changing the law to make it more in line with our Constitution, and to move people along with that change.”
“With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision of last Friday, the court simply tore up 49 years of law and history, ending federal recognition of a constitutional right Americans have enjoyed since 1973.”
“Today, the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency reversed almost 100 years of jurisprudence by arguing that Congress cannot delegate authority on ‘major questions’ to agencies in the executive branch.”
Almost exactly 35 years ago, when President Ronald Reagan nominated originalist Robert Bork for the Supreme Court, Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) recognized his legal theory for what it was: an unraveling of the modern United States.
“Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”
“America is a better and freer nation than Robert Bork thinks,” Kennedy said.
Alky, isn't it a pity that the only thing you can do is sit here 20 hours/day seven days/week supporting lies and liars while plagiarizing others and never posting an original thought of your own?
Alky, isn't it a pity that the only thing you can do is sit here 20 hours/day seven days/week supporting lies and liars while plagiarizing others and never posting an original thought of your own?
BWAAAAAA!!!!! WHILE YOU STILL BELIEVE TRUMP WON AND IS A WONDERFUL HUMAN BEING.....GOD YOU ARE STUPID!!!!!!!
Young Hutchinson is not only a patriot but has more guts than a feckless NY ass hole who thinks out his ass!!!!
Violent against politicians of either side is way too committed. The story about the man who was planning to kill Kavanaugh was ignored because of what I saw and read 📚.
Politifact Donald Trump stated on July 11, 2021 in in an interview on Fox News: “There were no guns whatsoever” at the Capitol riot on Jan. 6. truefalse
By Gabrielle Settles July 13, 2021 Jan. 6 defendants were armed with guns, other weapons, documents show
Court documents show that some of the more than 430 people charged with crimes related to the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol brought guns onto Capitol grounds or stashed them away while staying in Washington.
Many defendants used other weapons such as clubs, pepper spray, bear spray and flagpoles.
During an on-air conversation with Trump on July 11, "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo twice broached the topic of whether guns were present during the attack at the Capitol.
"They called it an armed insurrection, and yet no guns were seized," Bartiromo said before describing it as being among the "misinformation" spread about Trump’s presidency.
Later, she repeated the assertion: "They continue to call this an armed insurrection," Bartiromo said. "And yet no guns were seized, Mr. President."
"Right," Trump answered. "There were no guns whatsoever."
Trump went on to describe the events of Jan. 6 by saying that "people with no guns walked down" to the Capitol, that the building’s doors were open, and that there was a "lovefest" between the Capitol police and the insurrectionists.
Court documents, video evidence and news coverage directly contradict this characterization...
PolitiFact reviewed the case files of approximately 430 defendants who were arrested and charged for their actions at the Capitol. We found several defendants who police say were found to have brought firearms with them. Some were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds, while others stashed them away while in Washington.
They included: Jack Del Rio stated on June 8, 2022 in a press conference The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol “was a dust-up.”
Lonnie Coffman of Alabama: Police found multiple firearms and weapons in Coffman’s possession. Coffman’s truck, which he had parked in the vicinity of the Capitol on the morning of Jan. 6, was packed with weaponry including a handgun, a rifle and a shotgun, each loaded, according to court documents. In addition, the truck held hundreds of rounds of ammunition, several large-capacity ammunition feeding devices, a crossbow with bolts, machetes, camouflage smoke devices, a stun gun and 11 Molotov cocktails.
Court records and video surveillance footage show that Coffman, who had ties to militia groups, parked the vehicle near the Capitol at 9:15 a.m. that day. The documents say that after he got out of his pickup truck at 9:20 a.m., he joined a crowd of people who walked directly to the Capitol building.
He was detained later that evening as an unnamed woman was driving him back toward his truck. Police questioned Coffman and searched him, finding two more handguns on his person. None of the weapons were registered, documents state.
Guy Reffitt of Texas: Reffitt was charged with bringing a handgun onto Capitol grounds. Court documents showed that Reffitt, reported in court documents to be a member of the militia group Three Percenters, told his family he brought his gun with him and that he and others "stormed the Capitol."
Christopher Michael Alberts of Maryland: Alberts brought his handgun onto Capitol grounds. An officer saw that Alberts had a gun on his hip and alerted fellow officers. When Alberts tried to flee, officers detained him and recovered the loaded handgun along with a separate magazine.
The total number of people who carried firearms with them that day may not ever be fully accounted for because the majority of those involved in the siege were not arrested on-site but were tracked down by law enforcement days, weeks and months later.
It’s also worth noting that the definition of "armed" is not legally limited to guns — it refers to any weapon used for defense or offense and used as a means of protection. Other items used as weapons Jan. 6 included bats, crutches, flagpoles, skateboards, fire extinguishers and chemical sprays.
We reached out to Trump’s team to ask for evidence behind his statements but did not hear back. We also reached out to Fox News for comment but did not get a response by deadline.
Our ruling Trump said there were "no guns whatsoever" at the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and that "people with no guns" walked down to the Capitol.
Court records and news reports show that many insurrectionists were armed, and several were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds or stashed nearby while in Washington D.C. In addition, rioters had weapons other than firearms and used them during the attack.
"They continue to call this an armed insurrection," Bartiromo said. "And yet no guns were seized, Mr. President."
"Right," Trump answered. "There were no guns whatsoever."
Trump went on to describe the events of Jan. 6 by saying that "people with no guns walked down" to the Capitol, that the building’s doors were open, and that there was a "lovefest" between the Capitol police and the insurrectionists.
SOME LOVEFEST!
The liar knew that weapons were involved because those wanting to get to the Ellipse couldn't get thruogh the magnas although he wanted them turned off so they could.
And he would have sent them too, armed, to the Capitol.
What an unmitigated liar.
The historians will have a lot of fun with lying Trump and liars like you.
James. Like we said before that there are some good Republicans 👍
Arkansas GOP governor calls Trump 'a threat to democracy' -- and says he won't back him in 2024.
July 01, 2022
Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Friday said he would not back former President Donald Trump in 2024 after the J6 Committee hearings had revealed him to be a "threat to our democracy."
Appearing on CBS News, Hutchinson was asked about Rep. Liz Cheney's (R-WY) remarks this week in which she called Trump a "domestic threat" to the nation..
"As you can see from the testimony on January 6th and subsequent to the election, where he was challenging the legality of it, the lawful transfer of party, yes, that was a threat to our democracy," he said. "That was a threat to our institutions of government, and that's not the behavior we want to see in a responsible president."
Hutchinson went on to say that he still doubts the J6 Committee has made the case that Trump committed crimes in the wake of the 2020 election, but said he still believed the committee had provided more than enough evidence that Trump should never be president again.
"I would not be supporting him for 2024," he said. "He acted irresponsibly during that time he was a risk to the nation, absolutely."
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 142 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.” [The dumber ones!]
Sleeper ‘Wire Fraud’ Scheme Could Nail Trumpworld July 1, 2022 at 10:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 202 Comments
Daily Beast: “While the Jan. 6 hearings have delivered explosive testimony and evidence suggesting that a number of former administration officials may face criminal liability related to the attack on the Capitol—possibly all the way up to Trump—there’s another potential criminal liability that has largely been lost in the news.
“That would be the sprawling wire fraud conspiracy which the Jan. 6 special select committee alleged in its second hearing, on June 13, a scheme which legal experts say contains the ingredients for possible federal charges against officials with the campaign and the Republican National Committee—as well as Trump himself.”
Trump’s Fundraising Nosedives July 1, 2022 at 9:11 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 74 Comments
Associated Press: “Trump’s fundraising has fallen off dramatically over the last two months. He reported raising just over $19,000 in May and June combined after taking in nearly $9 million in March and April.”
Violent against politicians of either side is way too committed. The story about the man who was planning to kill Kavanaugh was ignored because of what I saw and read 📚.
LIAR.
You WANTED Kavanaugh murdered so FJB could nominate another leftist Marxist not wit.
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 181 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.”
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 181 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.”
HONEST, DECENT PASTOR AGAIN SKIRTS CENSORSHIP
said...
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 181 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.”
CLAIM: If it weren’t for this ballot collection scheme, former President Donald Trump would have had enough votes to win the 2020 election.
THE FACTS: This alleged scheme has not been proven, nor do these researchers have any way of knowing whether any ballots that were collected contained votes for Trump or for Biden.
Funny how it went from...
no proof that anyone dropped multiple ballots
to
no proof that anyone dropped multiple ballots that were not from relatives or others whom gave them permission
to
no proof that these dropped ballots were Biden ballots
Either way...
Apparently the fact that is illegal is of no concern?
We ignore the laws being broken and spend all our time trying to "find" a crime to charge Republicans with.. like demanding that carrying an American flag is dangerous weapon worthy of years of jail time.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said... PolitiFact reviewed the case files of approximately 430 defendants who were arrested and charged for their actions at the Capitol. We found several defendants who police say were found to have brought firearms with them. Some were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds
Who exactly are these "few" ?
funny the lying "fact checker" for the democrat party doesn't mention them
I know of one.
A man who brought his walking cane which could be a firearm if it had been loaded
It wasn't
out of tens if not hundreds of thousands of people...
Court records and news reports show that many insurrectionists were armed, and several were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds or stashed nearby while in Washington D.C. In addition, rioters had weapons other than firearms and used them during the attack.
Carefully worded phrase that basically admits...
There was nobody walking to the capitol actually carrying any guns. There were guns in a pickup truck and a couple of people had concealed guns (and apparently licences for them).
And the list of things that DC is charging these people with weapons charges include American flags, bicycle helmets, and flak jackets.
Ch seems to think that those who wouldn't go onto the Ellipse because the magnas would have made them give up their weapons must have laid those weapons down to walk to the Capitol.
posts 7:24,29,35,41,& 43 above were all IN MY OWN WORDS ONLY and were all originally deleted,
All those were found in the "Spam folder" from my comment area in Administration.
The reason they are back out there is because I chose to "publish" them.
The idea (in theory) is that the spam filter is supposed to "learn" from whether I publish or delete... which is why I continue to "publish" multiple comments that even might say the same thing. I don't want to encourage the spam filter on anything.
At least this is what Blogger Admin told me... to keep publishing and eventually it will learn.
But it is 2022 - and automated filters by social media to censor or toss things into spam is the new norm! Perhaps Reverend and Roger should use this frustration to understand how others feel when their tweets and such just "disappear" because someone else decided it needed to be censored.
Since it is now happening through AI and affecting everyone here...
We should all understand how destruction "censorship" is - regardless of the intent.
House Committee Describes Weapons Trump Supporters Had On Jan. 6, Including AR-15s
In a bombshell hearing about the Capitol attack, witness Cassidy Hutchinson said Donald Trump knew about his supporters carrying weapons on Jan 6. Sarah Ruiz-Grossman Jun 28, 2022, 03:05 PM EDT
In a surprise hearing of the House Jan. 6 committee, lawmakers played police radio transmissions identifying weapons — including AR-15s — that supporters of former President Donald Trump had with them on Jan. 6, 2021, the day of Trump’s rally and the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
In Tuesday’s hearing, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) — vice chair of the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack — played police transmissions that described people carrying firearms near the Ellipse in Washington, D.C., where Trump held his rally the morning of Jan. 6.
“Three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s... at 14th and Independence,” a voice says in one transmission.
“White male... stock of an AR-15,” someone can be heard saying in another recording. “Green fatigues... Glock-style pistols in their waistband.”
“Elevated threat in the trees... American flag face mask... weapon on the right-side hip,” a third transmission says.
Cheney noted that among the supporters who chose to pass through metal detectors so they could get closer to Trump, security screened weapons and equipment including pepper spray, knives, batons and gas masks. Several thousand more people did not go through metal detectors and watched from the nearby Washington Monument lawn.
The committee also showed a report sent by Secret Service at 11 a.m. that day warning of a man with a rifle near the Ellipse, where Trump was speaking.
In her surprise testimony Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, said that Tony Ornato ― who oversaw Secret Service movements ― said he told Trump there were people armed with weapons attending his rally on Jan. 6.
In videotaped testimony, Hutchinson recalled a meeting around 10 a.m. on Jan. 6 with Meadows and Ornato. At that meeting, she said, Ornato described people carrying knives, pistols, rifles, bear spray, body armor, spears and flagpoles. “Mark said, have you talked to the president?” Hutchinson said in her video testimony. “And Tony said yes.”
Later in her video testimony, Hutchinson said that Trump was angry about the crowd size. He wanted more people in the area where he was speaking, and he blamed the metal detectors, she said.
“I don’t f-ing care that they have weapons,” Trump said, per Hutchinson. “They’re not here to hurt me ... Take the f-ing mags away... Let my people in, they can march to the Capitol from here.”
Last year, Trump told Fox News that “there were no guns whatsoever” in the crowd on Jan. 6.
An armed mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol that day as lawmakers gathered to certify the 2020 presidential election, which Joe Biden won. Before the riot, Trump incited the crowd at his nearby rally by falsely claiming the election had been stolen. Five people died in the ensuing mayhem and its aftermath, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer.
Honest pastor trying to skirt cowardly censorshipNhON
said...
HERE'S THE ARTICLE CH DELETED. _________
HOW CAN YOU LIE SO BLATANTLY, CH?
House Committee Describes Weapons Trump Supporters Had On Jan. 6, Including AR-15s
In a bombshell hearing about the Capitol attack, witness Cassidy Hutchinson said Donald Trump knew about his supporters carrying weapons on Jan 6. by Sarah Ruiz-Grossman Jun 28, 2022, 03:05 PM EDT
In a surprise hearing of the House Jan. 6 committee, lawmakers played police radio transmissions identifying weapons — including AR-15s — that supporters of former President Donald Trump had with them on Jan. 6, 2021, the day of Trump’s rally and the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“Three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s... at 14th and Independence,” a voice says in one transmission.
“White male... stock of an AR-15,” someone can be heard saying in another recording. “Green fatigues... Glock-style pistols in their waistband.”
“Elevated threat in the trees... American flag face mask... weapon on the right-side hip,” a third transmission says.
Cheney noted that among the supporters who chose to pass through metal detectors so they could get closer to Trump, security screened weapons and equipment including pepper spray, knives, batons and gas masks. Several thousand more people did not go through metal detectors and watched from the nearby Washington Monument lawn.
WONDER WHY?
The committee also showed a report sent by Secret Service at 11 a.m. that day warning of a man with a rifle near the Ellipse, where Trump was speaking.
In her surprise testimony Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, said that Tony Ornato ― who oversaw Secret Service movements ― said he told Trump there were people armed with weapons attending his rally on Jan. 6.
In videotaped testimony, Hutchinson recalled a meeting around 10 a.m. on Jan. 6 with Meadows and Ornato. At that meeting, she said, Ornato described people carrying knives, pistols, rifles, bear spray, body armor, spears and flagpoles. “Mark said, have you talked to the president?” Hutchinson said in her video testimony. “And Tony said yes.”
Later in her video testimony, Hutchinson said that Trump was angry about the crowd size. He wanted more people in the area where he was speaking, and he blamed the metal detectors, she said.
“I don’t f-ing care that they have weapons,” Trump said, per Hutchinson. “They’re not here to hurt me ... Take the f-ing mags away... Let my people in, they can march to the Capitol from here.”
Last year, Trump told Fox News that “there were no guns whatsoever” in the crowd on Jan. 6.
An armed mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol that day as lawmakers gathered to certify the 2020 presidential election, which Joe Biden won. Before the riot, Trump incited the crowd at his nearby rally by falsely claiming the election had been stolen. Five people died in the ensuing mayhem and its aftermath, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer.
He had been told there were weapons among those who held back from the Ellipse because they did not want their weapons conficated, yet he wanted them to be let through armed the join the crowd he was about to send marching to the Capitol.
OH THE HISTORIANS WILL HAVE A FIELD DAY WITH THIS!
Democrats room to criticize their leaders and, if they choose, take a stand on principle.
The Republican Party is a far more monolithic entity, in which politicians compete over who adheres most faithfully to the party’s line. That line used to be defined by economic ideology, but these days it is more about positioning in the culture wars — and personal loyalty to Trump. It takes great moral courage for Republicans to defy the party’s diktats, and those who do are promptly excommunicated.
Roger, I start out posting here, using my usual name and photo and yes, often C & P's from politicalwire, and it goes along fine (and I publish far less of that than Roger does). And then I post something of my own that's REALLY cutting and it doesn't appear.
So then I try again, but I can ONLY get it to appear by using a different nomenclature and no photo.
Why would the spam filter kick in when I am posting my own comments, as I did in the list above, all of which I had to go back and get to stay by using a different version of my identity?
Even If the Democrats are just a coalition of interest groups, Republicans are now a coalition of crazies and cowards. And it’s hard to say which Republicans present the greater danger.
But unfortunately Scott has joined the cult.
Even the Governor of Arkansas said that he is a clear and present danger to American.
143 comments:
The alky, being his usual fucking moron* self, fell for this hook, line and sinker:
Axios: Justice Clarence Thomas ‘suggests’ COVID vaccines are made with aborted children; NBC News too; Politico also
As someone suggested in the replies, either Justice Clarence Thomas has changed his pronouns to “they/them” or he’s just reading something presented by the plaintiffs, as Axios reports:
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggested Thursday in a dissenting opinion that coronavirus vaccines were developed using “aborted children.”
…
“They object on religious grounds to all available COVID–19 vaccines because they were developed using cell lines derived from aborted children,” Thomas wrote in his dissent, referring to the plaintiffs that brought the lawsuit.
Referring to the plaintiffs that brought the lawsuit. So there’s nothing here to suggest that’s Thomas’ belief.
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2022/06/30/axios-justice-clarence-thomas-suggests-covid-vaccines-are-made-with-aborted-children/
*h/t: Indy Voter
Witnesses intimidation.
Former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson received at least one message tacitly warning her not to cooperate with the House January 6 select committee from an associate of former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
The message in question was the second of the two warnings that the select committee disclosed at the end of its special hearing when Hutchinson testified about how Donald Trump directed a crowd he knew was armed to march on the Capitol, the sources said.
“[A person] let me know you have your deposition tomorrow. He wants me to let you know that he’s thinking about you. He knows you’re loyal, and you’re going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition,” read the message. The redaction was Meadows, the sources said.
The message was presented during closing remarks at the special hearing with Hutchinson by the panel’s vice-chair Liz Cheney, who characterized the missive as improper pressure on a crucial witness that could extend to illegal witness tampering or intimidation.
The exact identity of the person who sent Hutchinson the message – beyond the fact that they were an associate of Meadows – could not be confirmed on Thursday, but that may be in part because the select committee may wish to interview that person, the sources said.
That appears to indicate that the person who sent the message was a close associate of the former White House chief of staff who may themselves be a fact witness to what Trump and Meadows were doing and thinking ahead of the Capitol attack.
Neither a spokesman for Meadows nor Hutchinson responded to a request for comment Thursday evening.
The other message was also directed at Hutchinson, the sources said; the quote displayed on the slide was one of several calls from Trump allies that Hutchinson recounted to House investigators.
“What they said to me is, as long as I continue to be a teamplayer, they know that I’m on the team, I’m doing the right thing, I’m protecting who I need to protect, you know, I’ll continue to stay in the good graces in Trump World,” the slide read.
“And they reminded me a couple of times that Trump does read transcripts and just to keep that in mind as I proceeded through my depositions and interviews with the committee.”
The identity of the people who called Hutchinson, warning her presumably not to implicate the former president, could not be established beyond the fact that they were people close to Trump, though the select committee is understood to be aware of all of the people.
Politico, which first reported that the message to Hutchinson came from an associate of Meadows, also reported that it came before her second interview with the select committee. Hutchinson changed lawyers before her fourth deposition that preceded her public testimony.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/30/jan-6-hearings-trump-mark-meadows-cassidy-hutchinson-threatened
On the next hearing, we will see the John Dean of the Trump administration.
The House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol attack issued a subpoena on Wednesday to the former Trump White House counsel Pat Cipollone, compelling him to testify about at least three parts of Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
The subpoena marked a dramatic escalation for the panel and showed its resolve in seeking to obtain inside information about how the former president sought to return himself to office from the unique perspective of the White House counsel’s office.
“Mr Cipollone repeatedly raised legal and other concerns about President Trump’s activities on January 6 and in the days that preceded,” the chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, said in a statement accompanying the subpoena.
Happy July 😊
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/29/january-6-committee-subpoena-pat-cipollone
The Most Hopeless Day of the SCOTUS Term
July 1, 2022 at 3:50 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 4 Comments
Mark Joseph Stern: “No single day has better captured the current state of the Supreme Court than Thursday. At 10 a.m., the court issued a devastating assault on the Biden administration’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases in a 6–3 ruling joined by all of the court’s reactionary block. Ten minutes later, it issued a 5–4 opinion that just barely confirmed that the president, rather than a rogue judge in Texas, has authority over border policy, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh lending the lone votes preventing an absolutely insane outcome. Shortly thereafter, the court issued a bombshell orders list that tees up, for next term, one of the most important and dangerous democracy cases in American history, which asks whether state legislatures have near-unlimited authority over election laws.”
“The court’s most immediately lethal decision remains Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. But do not let Dobbs distract from the onslaught that followed it.”
Welcome to the Judicialtocricy.
And a packed court would be a judicialocricy on steroids
So her testimony has been completely debunked and refuted. This committee has become a laughingstock and cheney a useful idiot for Pelosi hatred of trump.
The three agents do not dispute that Trump was furious that the agents would not take him to the Capitol.
Even after the car returned Trump to the West Wing, he still wouldn’t let go of wanting to reach the Capitol.
“When we got back to the White House, he said he wanted to physically walk with the marchers, and according to my notes, he then said he’d be fine with just riding the Beast,” former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in videotaped testimony to the committee, referring to the nickname for the fortified presidential limo. “He wanted to be a part of the march in some fashion.”
Trump was furious with Meadows for failing to make the trip happen, Hutchinson testified that Meadows told her. By the time they were back in the West Wing, the televisions were showing live coverage of the rioters overpowering police and getting closer to the Capitol’s doors and windows. Hutchinson testified that she entered Meadows’s office and asked him if he was watching.
“The rioters are getting really close,” she recalled asking the chief of staff. “Have you talked to the president?”
“No,” Meadows answered, while scrolling and texting on his phone, according to Hutchinson’s testimony, “he wants to be alone right now.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/01/trump-capitol-riot-march/
Toward the end of 2020, then-President Donald Trump began raising a new idea with aides: that he would personally lead a march to the Capitol on the following Jan. 6.
Trump brought it up repeatedly with key advisers in the Oval Office, according to a person who talked with him about it. The president told others he wanted a dramatic, made-for-TV moment that could pressure Republican lawmakers to support his demand to throw out the electoral college results showing that Joe Biden had defeated him, the person said.
The excursion that almost happened came into clearer focus this week, as the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 presented explosive testimony and records detailing Trump’s fervent demands to lead his supporters mobbing the seat of government. Though Trump’s trip was ultimately thwarted by his own security officers, the new evidence cuts closer to the critical question of what he knew about the violence in store for that day.
Travesty. Outrage.
Making the congress actually fucking legislate rather than allowing an alphabet agency full of nameless, faceless bureaucrats to simply impose punitive and draconian "climate" regulations on the nation with no legislation or congressional oversight.
Iow's... Giving the people a voice and a vote via their elected representatives.
I'm literally shaking right now.
It's shit like this which demands that we pack the court with several dozen demonstrably 'progressive' Justices so the people never, ever have a voice again via their elected representatives.
Old and busted: Representative Republic.
New hotness: Rule by Judicial Fiat.
Good morning.
Donald Trump’s former aide Cassidy Hutchinson was warned by an associate of the former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows not to cooperate with the House January 6 select committee, two sources familiar with the matter have said.
Anonymous Myballsinthewoodsagain said...
So her testimony has been completely debunked and refuted.
This broad has just reduced her marriage prospects to zero.
No guy with an IQ of a potted plant or higher could ever trust her. Not when she can be so easily coerced to tell such fabulist lies with such ease.
Marry her and 10 minutes after you leave for work she's taking it in the ass from the pool boy.
... two sources familiar with the matter have said.
LMAO. I'm so sorry this is happening to you alky.
LMAO at you again rat as the anonymous sources you used the other day are now dog shit....Too bad Cassidy has a bigger see of balls then you do....most amusing for a man with many guns to enhance his egollllll..>>BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA
Jan. 6. The Jan. 6 select committee will have at least two more hearings this month, and we know how much political oxygen these suck up. The select committee has subpoenaed former White House counsel Pat Cipollone for a deposition next week, but that issue may end up in court. Panel members have a final report to issue, and they also must decide whether to make any criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, including potentially for former President Donald Trump. There’s lots of action on this front, and it will steal headlines for most of the month.
Yeah, it's real important whether Trump did or did not have a temper tantrum.
Did he reach for the wheel? Did he get aggressive with one agent who grabbed his arm?
Did he throw his ketchup lunch against the WH cafeteria wall?
More important:
Was he really willing to send armed insurrectionists to the Capitol building?
Many people heard him say that.
Quote of the Day
July 1, 2022 at 7:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 6 Comments
“When you try to overthrow the will of the people, and you try a coup in the United States government, you have to pay for that. Period.”
— Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), on Late Night.
A Withering Indictment of the Entire GOP
July 1, 2022 at 1:45 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 16 Comments
Peter Wehner: “However this plays out, this needs to be said: For the past half-dozen years, the Republican Party and the American right—with a very few honorable exceptions— stood with Trump, defended him, and attacked his critics. Some went silent in the face of his indecency and lawlessness; many others gleefully promulgated his lies and conspiracy theories. Together they attempted to annihilate truth on his behalf, in his name, for their party, to seize and to hold power.
“Some comfort themselves by saying that they went along for the ride so they could promote their policy agenda. Others were afraid to speak up. Still others did it for ratings and money. Some Trump supporters were true believers. Some rationalized their deal with the (figurative) devil; others were more transparent and more cynical…
“No matter; the die is cast when it comes to the Trump presidency and those who made it possible. The events of January 6 were, in their own twisted way, a fitting denouement for the Trump presidency. It was so obvious, for so long, that this wouldn’t end well. Trump was the primary architect of the attack on the citadel of American democracy. But he had a lot of help along the way.
WILL THE GOP EVER LIVE THIS DOWN?
Justice Department Blindsided by This Week’s Testimony
July 1, 2022 at 4:06 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 100 Comments
David Rhode:
“Hutchinson’s testimony astonished Justice Department prosecutors as much as it did the viewing public, the Times reported. It also blindsided them. The committee gave no advance warning of Hutchinson’s statements to department prosecutors, who have spent months investigating the assault. The prosecutors don’t have access to videos and transcripts of hours of testimony that Hutchinson has provided to the committee behind closed doors.
“A rift appears to be opening between Congress and the D.O.J. Earlier this month, four top Justice Department officials sent a letter to the committee criticizing it for not sharing transcripts from the thousand-plus interviews it has conducted.”
SO LET THE DOJ GET A LOT MORE AGGRESSIVE IN ITS OWN INVESTIGATION OF ALL THIS.
The Most Hopeless Day of the SCOTUS Term
July 1, 2022 at 3:50 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 7 Comments
Mark Joseph Stern:
“No single day has better captured the current state of the Supreme Court than Thursday. At 10 a.m., the court issued a devastating assault on the Biden administration’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases in a 6–3 ruling joined by all of the court’s reactionary block.
"Ten minutes later, it issued a 5–4 opinion that just barely confirmed that the president, rather than a rogue judge in Texas, has authority over border policy, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh lending the lone votes preventing an absolutely insane outcome. Shortly thereafter, the court issued a bombshell orders list that tees up, for next term, one of the most important and dangerous democracy cases in American history, which asks whether state legislatures have near-unlimited authority over election laws.
“The court’s most immediately lethal decision remains Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. But do not let Dobbs distract from the onslaught that followed it.”
REPUBLIAN OVERREACH.
TIME FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO RISE UP AND RECLAIM DEMOCRACY AND REAL ELECTIONS FOR THEMSELVES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
Abortion Rights Grow as Priorities
July 1, 2022 at 3:14 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 3 Comments
A new AP-NORC poll “finds a growing percentage of Americans calling out abortion or women’s rights as priorities for the government in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, especially among Democrats and those who support abortion access.”
“With midterm elections looming, President Joe Biden and Democrats will seek to capitalize on that shift.”
Hutchinson is unique in history. Who else can claim to have wiped from a White House wall ketchup thrown there by an American PINO (President In Name Only).
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there by a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there gy a PINO? (President In Name Only)
Hutchinson is unique in American history. Who else can claim to have cleaned from a White House wall ketchup thrown there by a PINO? (President In Name Only)
All the spamming doesn't change the fact that the people who were there say she is either mistaken or lying.
Even the note she said she wrote now appears to be from someone else.
"The reason why gas prices are up is Russia. Russia, Russia, Russia."
- Joe Biden
LMAO.
Pedo this is what voters care about
Stocks Close Out Worst First Half Of A Year Since 1970
November is coming
Have the handwriting experts looked into that yet?
Of course, it would be VERY important whether she wrote it or the man she said dictated it to her.
That's earth shaking.
The June 2022 AP-NORC Center Poll
Conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research
With funding from The Associated Press and NORC at the University of Chicago
Interviews: 06/23-27 /2022
1,053 adults
Margin of sampling error: +/- 4.0 percentage points at the 95% confidence level among all adults
NOTE: All results show percentages among all respondents, unless otherwise labeled.
https://apnorc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/June-AP-NORC-topline-abortion.pdf
LOL. THWAP!!!
From Cali's link -
CRUCIAL QUOTE
“A global central bank effort to fight inflation is driving rising recession fears that have given Wall Street the worst half of the year since 1970,” says Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda. “Added volatility from the final trading day of the quarter is especially crazy because so many investors are rebalancing their portfolios with recession stocks.”
SURPRISING FACT
It took the stock market just 161 days to fall from its peak in January to a 20% decline threshold in June—well below the average time of 245 days in past bear markets, according to data from CFRA Research.
Some experts say that could well be “good news” for markets, as a quicker descent into a bear market often tends to mean more “shallow” declines followed by an eventual rebound.
Earth shaking like was his hand on the wheel and did the other hand go to the clavical area of the agent who grabbed the first hand?
I'm more interested in whether he wanted the mags turned off so armed insurrectionts could get into the Ellipse before he sent them to march on the Capitol Building.
Have handwriting experts looked into that note yet?
Of course, it would be VERY important whether she wrote the note or the man she said dictated it to her.
That would be earth shaking.
Earth shaking like did Trump's hand go to the wheel and did his other hand go to the clavical area of the agent who grabbed that hand?
I'm more interested in whether he wanted the mags turned off so armed insurrectionts could get into the Ellipse before he sent them to march on the Capitol Building.
A lot of people heard him demand that the mags be turned off.
Hey asshole "pastor" Boswell,
Why were none of those armed insurrectionists you keep brining up every found at the Capitol ?
Were they with Bigfoot ?
Or are you talking about the Capitol Police who apparently were responsible for every death ?
Or are you just lying again?
* bringing
Are you claiming that Trump didn't want the mags turned off?
That would be a REAL lie, wouldn't it?
* maybe if the committee ever let the 14,000 hours of available video out we could find them among the people singing America the Beautiful or God Bless America.
Or as you call those people "insurrectionists"
So far six women have come forward to accuse Trump of 'grabbing them by the steering wheel' ... two sources familiar with the matter have said.
That was not anonymous. That was me.
I see the "pastor" has anonymously disappeared
coward
and liar
Hand writing experts? The committee hasn't even reached out to the agents who were actually there.
This is about a political narrative orchestrated by Pelosi who absolutely hates Trump.
rrb said...
So far six women have come forward to accuse Trump of 'grabbing them by the steering wheel' ... two sources familiar with the matter have said.
ROFLMFAO !!!
That was not anonymous. That was me.
I'm being censored.
A lot of people heard Trump raging over wanting the mags turned off.
And yes, I would consider armed people marching to the capitol insurrectionists.
Maybe we should ask the courts to decide that.
Anonymous Honest pastor said...
That was not anonymous. That was me.
I'm being censored.
Stop lying and stop spamming
Now that would be monumental
glad you kept your word and are not active here anymore
ROFLMFAO !!!
the lies keep flowing
Trump wanted the mags turned off.
That's not a lie.
The lying POS "pastor" said:
I would consider armed people marching to the capitol insurrectionists.
well let's see some photos of them
How about a link to just three
even better show the video.
They must have been the first to breach, right ?
Or just admit you are lying
and weaseling
as usual
Who cares if Trump wanted the mags turned off ?
Ever stand in line waiting to get in an event?
Especially with so many people and so few staff
They slow everything down tremendously
And there were no "armed insurrectionists"
and you know it
stop lying
you're a disgrace to religion
Who cares if Trump wanted the mags turned off?
A federal judge may care.
thebradfordfile
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1541543442182033409
Biden: "I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings."
LMAO.
Too bad Hunter kept the voicemail on his laptop
Is Garland on top of this ?
or do we live in a Banana Republic
too easy
we are fucked
Anonymous Pastor, laughing, said...
Who cares if Trump wanted the mags turned off?
A federal judge may care.
Why
Are you this fucking stupid ?
guess that's too easy too
thebradfordfile
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1542654618408189954
Every "bombshell" of the Trump era ended up being fake--including the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson.
6 years of this lying shit
enough
Because it indicates that Trump wanted to send armed insurrectionists to the Capitol.
Far too easy!
The End of the Federal Government as We Know It
July 1, 2022 at 8:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 59 Comments
Heather Cox Richardson: “In the past, the Supreme Court has operated on the basis of ‘stare decisis,’ which literally means ‘to stand by things decided.’ The purpose of that principle is to make changes incrementally so the law stays consistent and evenly applied, which promotes social stability. On occasion, the court does break precedent, notably in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision, which overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that rubber stamped racial segregation. When that sort of a major change happens, both the court and elected officials work hard to explain that they are changing the law to make it more in line with our Constitution, and to move people along with that change.”
“With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision of last Friday, the court simply tore up 49 years of law and history, ending federal recognition of a constitutional right Americans have enjoyed since 1973.”
“Today, the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency reversed almost 100 years of jurisprudence by arguing that Congress cannot delegate authority on ‘major questions’ to agencies in the executive branch.”
The End of the Federal Government as We Know It
July 1, 2022 at 8:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 59 Comments
Heather Cox Richardson: “In the past, the Supreme Court has operated on the basis of ‘stare decisis,’ which literally means ‘to stand by things decided.’ The purpose of that principle is to make changes incrementally so the law stays consistent and evenly applied, which promotes social stability. On occasion, the court does break precedent, notably in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision, which overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that rubber stamped racial segregation. When that sort of a major change happens, both the court and elected officials work hard to explain that they are changing the law to make it more in line with our Constitution, and to move people along with that change.”
“With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision of last Friday, the court simply tore up 49 years of law and history, ending federal recognition of a constitutional right Americans have enjoyed since 1973.”
“Today, the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency reversed almost 100 years of jurisprudence by arguing that Congress cannot delegate authority on ‘major questions’ to agencies in the executive branch.”
Amused pastor said...
Because it indicates that Trump wanted to send armed insurrectionists to the Capitol.
were they under your bed ?
Apparently they were so good no one actually saw them
or took any pictures or video of them
Why are you stuck on this lie ?
dementia?
Catturd ™
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1542847377639366657
😂😂😂 Someone better tell Obama and Nancy Pelosi who just bought huge mansions there.
BTW - Kagan and anyone who believes this fake, alarmist hogwash is insane.
Fox News
@FoxNews
Justice Kagan warns parts of East Coast could be 'swallowed by the ocean' in dissent in EPA case https://fxn.ws/3nupczO
soon libs will be claiming global warming will cause a flat earth
Megyn Kelly: ‘First-year law student’ could discredit Cassidy Hutchinson testimony
Megyn Kelly was the first journalist to go hard after Donald Trump in a 2016 presidential debate.
But now she’s on his side.
On “The Megyn Kelly Show” on Thursday, the former Fox News and NBC News correspondent poured scorn on the dramatic testimony at the Jan. 6 special committee by former White House staffer Cassidy Hutchinson.
“A first-year law student could have driven a truck through the holes in that testimonial,” said Ms. Kelly, who has a law-school degree.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jun/30/megyn-kelly-first-year-law-student-could-discredit/
Lucy pulled the football for the 88,000 time during and after the Trump presidency
and libs claim to still believe every one
Stock futures slip after the S&P 500’s worst first half since 1970
Anonymous Myballsinthewoodsagain said...
All the spamming doesn't change the fact that the people who were there say she is either mistaken or lying.
BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!! That's all you fucking assholes have.....claim without a shred of proof she is lying.....It Is the Trumpian GOP way scream louder to make your guy look good.....anyone who doubts trumps doesn't have a propensity to act like a petulant child throwing things around are sadly delusional!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Disclose.tv
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1542813832892059650
JUST IN - Fear of freezing: Wood stoves and firewood are in short supply nationwide in Germany.
"The market is empty," Gerd Müller, head of the office of the German Firewood Association, tells dpa.
Germany led "progress" on the green new deal
Joe is following
The force of the Supreme Court's right turn has shaken the country
By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer
Updated 1 hour ago Jul 1, 2022
(CNN) - The Supreme Court reached into every corner of American life, reordering intimate family choices, breaching the separation of church and state, and diminishing the steps government can take to prevent gun violence or protect the environment.
The upheaval of the past several weeks, especially as the court outright ended a half-century of women's privacy rights, is unmatched in modern times. The speed and sweep by which the right-wing majority acted reflects, as one liberal dissenter wrote, a "restless and newly constituted Court."
And it is not finished.
The conservative supermajority -- anchored by three relatively young appointees of former President Donald Trump -- is positioned to continue its impact with disputes next session over the Voting Rights Act, affirmative action and religious objections to LGBTQ protections.
Yet it will be the epic 2021-22 session that stands out over time. The case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, reversing Roe v. Wade, will likely be remembered as one of the most far-reaching rulings in Supreme Court history. The 5-4 decision marked the first-ever complete reversal of a constitutional right.
The justices also enlarged the Second Amendment, favoring gun owners, and redefined the balance between the First Amendment's prohibition against government "establishment of religion" and its "free exercise." That will allow more prayer in public settings and require more government money for religious education.
The new landscape was made possible because of the three Trump appointees -- Neil Gorsuch, age 54, Brett Kavanaugh, 57, and Amy Coney Barrett, 50. They separated themselves from prior Republican-named justices who had adhered to precedent and "the promise of constancy," as Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy and David Souter called it in the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirmed Roe.
The drive to the right was not wholly unexpected, even though its force has shaken the country.
When liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September 2020 and Trump quickly replaced her with Barrett, the new six-justice right-wing bloc appeared positioned to roll back decades of individual rights and government power.
.
When the three liberals, including Breyer, dissented in the Dobbs abortion case, they recalled a lament of Breyer's from 2007 as he dissented from a decision striking down school reintegration plans: "It is not often in the law that so few have so quickly changed so much."
"So few" are now -- as a supermajority -- more aptly "so many."
The swift pace of such great change has been staggering. Dissenters tried, in vain, to hold on to precedent that went back half a century in the abortion rights and religious liberties controversies.
In the EPA case, they clung to a recent precedent, a 2007 case in which the high court recognized the EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide and to address environmental crises.
"But that Court," wrote Kagan, "was not this Court."
Don't forget "2000 Mules"
___
CLAIM: If it weren’t for this ballot collection scheme, former President Donald Trump would have had enough votes to win the 2020 election.
THE FACTS: This alleged scheme has not been proven, nor do these researchers have any way of knowing whether any ballots that were collected contained votes for Trump or for Biden.
There’s no evidence a massive ballot harvesting scheme dumped a large amount of votes for one candidate into drop boxes, and if there were, it would likely be caught quickly, according to Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Iowa.
“Once you get just a few people involved, people start to reveal the scheme because it unravels pretty quickly,” he said.
Absentee ballots are also verified by signature and tracked closely, often with an option for voters themselves to see where their ballot is at any given time. That process safeguards against anyone who tries to illegally cast extra ballots, according to Barry Burden, a University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor and the director of the Elections Research Project.
“It seems impossible in that system for a nefarious actor to dump lots of ballots that were never requested by voters and were never issued by election officials,” Burden said.
Holy shit batman......Trump loses the extremely conservative Washington Examiner which says he couldn't be a dog shit cleaner up!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/wing-news-declares-trump-unfit-080155438.html
No one is censoring you, you stupid old man
Something Stinks in Colorado
How did an unknown candidate with no following and no money tie with Tina Peters in a GOP primary?
According to the State of Colorado — and The Associated Press and the New York Times! — the official results for the GOP primary race for Secretary of State have Pam Anderson winning with 43% of the total vote, and Tina Peters second with 28% — but the real story was that Australian businessman Mike O’Donnell had picked up 28% himself, and might actually beat Tina Peters too.
I wanted to know more about Mike O’Donnell because I had never heard of Mike O’Donnell.
In the most high-profile race in America for the office of Secretary of State, a candidate who had become a national political figure, who had the highest name recognition, who outraised both of her opponents by 3 to 1, who spoke at rallies with President Trump, who was the obvious frontrunner — that person didn’t just lose, but she tied with a guy who had none of those things in a GOP primary.
I didn’t even know that Mike O’Donnell was running in the race until I saw the race results. How did an unknown candidate like Mike O’Donnell manage to garner as many votes as a national political figure like Tina Peters?
This question, ladies and gentlemen, is what leads you down the rabbit hole of America’s bogus election system.
I went looking, in other words, for Mike O’Donnell’s 170,000 supporters in Colorado.
I didn’t find them on Facebook — only 193 people were following his campaign page.
Mike O’Donnell’s 170,000 supporters were not hiding on Twitter either — just 560 of them were following his campaign at all. The day before the election, his last tweet managed to get 4 “likes.”
That’s the most interaction that his campaign Twitter account got — ever.
Mike O’Donnell sent out 1,306 tweets on his account and the vast majority of them got: 0 Likes — and 0 Retweets — and 0 Comments. There was no interaction on his Twitter account because nobody was voting for Mike O’Donnell.
How about fundraising? According to Colorado Public Radio News, Mike O’Donnell had managed to raise $4,700 for his campaign three weeks before the primary.
And yet on election day, Mike O’Donnell got nearly a third of the total vote and over 600,000 people voted in that race. More than 170,000 Colorado voters suddenly appear out of nowhere for Mike O’Donnell.
So many people suddenly appear for Mike O’Donnell that he actually wins 17 counties in Colorado.
Mike O’Donnell is the outright winner in Jackson County (43%) and Rio Blanco County (37%) and Conejos County (41%) and Fremont County (34%) and Las Animas County (36%) and Prowers County (37%) and Bent County (34%) and Otero County (40%) and Kiowa County (38%) and Lincoln County (39%) and Cheyenne County (40%) and Kit Carson County (42%) and Yuma County (43%) and Washington County (40%) and Morgan County (38%) and Phillips County (34%) and Sedgwick County (38%) according to the New York Times .
continues:
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/something-stinks-in-colorado
I can tell roger still hasn't watched 2,000 mules
odd for someone who claims to look at both sides before making up his mind
guess he hates watching horror movies
like the 2020 election system
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
The force of the Supreme Court's right turn has shaken the country
By Joan Biskupic, CNN legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer
Just think Alky, you’ll be worm food before this court changes
LOL
You choose not to believe her.
“I don’t fucking care they have weapons. Let my people in. They aren’t here to hurt me. Take the magnetometers away” and “they can march to the Capitol after the rally is over.”
thebradfordfile
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1538706700617777152
The January 6th committee keeps talking about the election, but has not shown the numerous videos of people making multiple trips to stuff ballots into boxes in the middle of the night. Weird.
Enough of the lying.
I agree with that.
And the Liar In Chief is TRUMP.
Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
You choose not to believe her.
Yep, I am not an idiot
The End of the Federal Government as We Know It
July 1, 2022 at 8:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 136 Comments
Heather Cox Richardson: “In the past, the Supreme Court has operated on the basis of ‘stare decisis,’ which literally means ‘to stand by things decided.’ The purpose of that principle is to make changes incrementally so the law stays consistent and evenly applied, which promotes social stability. On occasion, the court does break precedent, notably in 1954 with the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision, which overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that rubber stamped racial segregation. When that sort of a major chanPge happens, both the court and elected officials work hard to explain that they are changing the law to make it more in line with our Constitution, and to move people along with that change.”
“With the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision of last Friday, the court simply tore up 49 years of law and history, ending federal recognition of a constitutional right Americans have enjoyed since 1973.”
“Today, the court’s decision in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency reversed almost 100 years of jurisprudence by arguing that Congress cannot delegate authority on ‘major questions’ to agencies in the executive branch.”
The EPA was started by President Richard Nixon.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
Enough of the lying.
I agree with that.
Good, the lying "pastor" is back.
Plenty of time to now produce the pictures/videos of all those aremed "insurrectionists" he claims were there
Or provide more proof he lied again and can't produce them
Matt Whitlock
https://twitter.com/mattdizwhitlock/status/1542704203050745856
Great poll question: Are you comfortable playing record-high gas prices to protect the “liberal world order?”
I’d be willing to bet less than 20% say yes.
well people locked in insane asylums don't drive and would be willing for that
after all they are Biden's strongest supporters
Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸
VIDEO:
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1542847605058797571
Jon Voight calls for the impeachment of Joe Biden
but with Kamala we'd be fucked anyway
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
You choose not to believe her.
Only because she a fucking liar and a sociopath.
Other than that, I have nothing against her.
Just think Alky, you’ll be worm food before this court changes
LOL
LOL. Yep.
All he has going for him is his shiny new black vagina.
The "First Black Supreme Court Justice in U. S. History" according to 'Good Morning America.'
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2022/07/01/busted-gma-deleting-tweet-that-called-ketanji-brown-jackson-the-first-black-scotus-justice-in-u-s-history-goes-so-so-so-wrong/
Almost exactly 35 years ago, when President Ronald Reagan nominated originalist Robert Bork for the Supreme Court, Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) recognized his legal theory for what it was: an unraveling of the modern United States.
“Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy.”
“America is a better and freer nation than Robert Bork thinks,” Kennedy said.
And yet, here we are.
https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/june-30-2022?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Alky, isn't it a pity that the only thing you can do is sit here 20 hours/day seven days/week supporting lies and liars while plagiarizing others and never posting an original thought of your own?
Think about that.
I love the smell of TDS in the morning.
It smells like... the alky.
LOL.
Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) r
Mary Jo could not be reached for comment
Alky, isn't it a pity that the only thing you can do is sit here 20 hours/day seven days/week supporting lies and liars while plagiarizing others and never posting an original thought of your own?
BWAAAAAA!!!!! WHILE YOU STILL BELIEVE TRUMP WON AND IS A WONDERFUL HUMAN BEING.....GOD YOU ARE STUPID!!!!!!!
Young Hutchinson is not only a patriot but has more guts than a feckless NY ass hole who thinks out his ass!!!!
There is far more intelligence in Roger's posts than the dribble being spoken against them. And him.
This is a troubling story
Violent against politicians of either side is way too committed.
The story about the man who was planning to kill Kavanaugh was ignored because of what I saw and read 📚.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/07/01/the-real-reason-washington-ignored-kavanaughs-would-be-killer-00043679
Politifact
Donald Trump
stated on July 11, 2021 in in an interview on Fox News:
“There were no guns whatsoever” at the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.
truefalse
By Gabrielle Settles
July 13, 2021
Jan. 6 defendants were armed with guns, other weapons, documents show
Court documents show that some of the more than 430 people charged with crimes related to the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol brought guns onto Capitol grounds or stashed them away while staying in Washington.
Many defendants used other weapons such as clubs, pepper spray, bear spray and flagpoles.
During an on-air conversation with Trump on July 11, "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo twice broached the topic of whether guns were present during the attack at the Capitol.
"They called it an armed insurrection, and yet no guns were seized," Bartiromo said before describing it as being among the "misinformation" spread about Trump’s presidency.
Later, she repeated the assertion: "They continue to call this an armed insurrection," Bartiromo said. "And yet no guns were seized, Mr. President."
"Right," Trump answered. "There were no guns whatsoever."
Trump went on to describe the events of Jan. 6 by saying that "people with no guns walked down" to the Capitol, that the building’s doors were open, and that there was a "lovefest" between the Capitol police and the insurrectionists.
Court documents, video evidence and news coverage directly contradict this characterization...
PolitiFact reviewed the case files of approximately 430 defendants who were arrested and charged for their actions at the Capitol. We found several defendants who police say were found to have brought firearms with them. Some were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds, while others stashed them away while in Washington.
They included:
Jack Del Rio stated on June 8, 2022 in a press conference The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol “was a dust-up.”
Lonnie Coffman of Alabama: Police found multiple firearms and weapons in Coffman’s possession. Coffman’s truck, which he had parked in the vicinity of the Capitol on the morning of Jan. 6, was packed with weaponry including a handgun, a rifle and a shotgun, each loaded, according to court documents. In addition, the truck held hundreds of rounds of ammunition, several large-capacity ammunition feeding devices, a crossbow with bolts, machetes, camouflage smoke devices, a stun gun and 11 Molotov cocktails.
Court records and video surveillance footage show that Coffman, who had ties to militia groups, parked the vehicle near the Capitol at 9:15 a.m. that day. The documents say that after he got out of his pickup truck at 9:20 a.m., he joined a crowd of people who walked directly to the Capitol building.
He was detained later that evening as an unnamed woman was driving him back toward his truck. Police questioned Coffman and searched him, finding two more handguns on his person. None of the weapons were registered, documents state.
Guy Reffitt of Texas: Reffitt was charged with bringing a handgun onto Capitol grounds. Court documents showed that Reffitt, reported in court documents to be a member of the militia group Three Percenters, told his family he brought his gun with him and that he and others "stormed the Capitol."
Christopher Michael Alberts of Maryland: Alberts brought his handgun onto Capitol grounds. An officer saw that Alberts had a gun on his hip and alerted fellow officers. When Alberts tried to flee, officers detained him and recovered the loaded handgun along with a separate magazine.
The total number of people who carried firearms with them that day may not ever be fully accounted for because the majority of those involved in the siege were not arrested on-site but were tracked down by law enforcement days, weeks and months later.
It’s also worth noting that the definition of "armed" is not legally limited to guns — it refers to any weapon used for defense or offense and used as a means of protection. Other items used as weapons Jan. 6 included bats, crutches, flagpoles, skateboards, fire extinguishers and chemical sprays.
We reached out to Trump’s team to ask for evidence behind his statements but did not hear back. We also reached out to Fox News for comment but did not get a response by deadline.
Our ruling
Trump said there were "no guns whatsoever" at the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and that "people with no guns" walked down to the Capitol.
Court records and news reports show that many insurrectionists were armed, and several were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds or stashed nearby while in Washington D.C. In addition, rioters had weapons other than firearms and used them during the attack.
We rate this claim False.
"They continue to call this an armed insurrection," Bartiromo said. "And yet no guns were seized, Mr. President."
"Right," Trump answered. "There were no guns whatsoever."
Trump went on to describe the events of Jan. 6 by saying that "people with no guns walked down" to the Capitol, that the building’s doors were open, and that there was a "lovefest" between the Capitol police and the insurrectionists.
SOME LOVEFEST!
The liar knew that weapons were involved because those wanting to get to the Ellipse couldn't get thruogh the magnas although he wanted them turned off so they could.
And he would have sent them too, armed, to the Capitol.
What an unmitigated liar.
The historians will have a lot of fun with lying Trump and liars like you.
Bidenomics has failed Americans
ISM manufacturing index June. 53.0% down a staggering 3%.
https://twitter.com/Liz_Cheney/status/1542552426531545089?t=jhT035317LYmr87wkjOajg&s=19
Young Hutchinson is not only a patriot.
By a true conservative woman who's father was the Vice President for President George W Bush.
But the soars people have lost their minds.
BIDENOMICS has failed Americans.
Construction spending May -0.1%
Down , - 0.9%
Funny how Bidenomics was to build A Better America 🇺🇸.
They have built a broker America.
Funny how Bidenomics was to build A Better America 🇺🇸.
They have built a broker America.
James. Like we said before that there are some good Republicans 👍
Arkansas GOP governor calls Trump 'a threat to democracy' -- and says he won't back him in 2024.
July 01, 2022
Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Friday said he would not back former President Donald Trump in 2024 after the J6 Committee hearings had revealed him to be a "threat to our democracy."
Appearing on CBS News, Hutchinson was asked about Rep. Liz Cheney's (R-WY) remarks this week in which she called Trump a "domestic threat" to the nation..
"As you can see from the testimony on January 6th and subsequent to the election, where he was challenging the legality of it, the lawful transfer of party, yes, that was a threat to our democracy," he said. "That was a threat to our institutions of government, and that's not the behavior we want to see in a responsible president."
Hutchinson went on to say that he still doubts the J6 Committee has made the case that Trump committed crimes in the wake of the 2020 election, but said he still believed the committee had provided more than enough evidence that Trump should never be president again.
"I would not be supporting him for 2024," he said. "He acted irresponsibly during that time he was a risk to the nation, absolutely."
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse
July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 142 Comments
David Rothkopf:
“Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.” [The dumber ones!]
https://www.rawstory.com/asa-hutchinson-trump-2657596472/
Sleeper ‘Wire Fraud’ Scheme Could Nail Trumpworld
July 1, 2022 at 10:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 202 Comments
Daily Beast: “While the Jan. 6 hearings have delivered explosive testimony and evidence suggesting that a number of former administration officials may face criminal liability related to the attack on the Capitol—possibly all the way up to Trump—there’s another potential criminal liability that has largely been lost in the news.
“That would be the sprawling wire fraud conspiracy which the Jan. 6 special select committee alleged in its second hearing, on June 13, a scheme which legal experts say contains the ingredients for possible federal charges against officials with the campaign and the Republican National Committee—as well as Trump himself.”
Trump’s Fundraising Nosedives
July 1, 2022 at 9:11 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 74 Comments
Associated Press: “Trump’s fundraising has fallen off dramatically over the last two months. He reported raising just over $19,000 in May and June combined after taking in nearly $9 million in March and April.”
HIS BIG DONORS ARE RUNNING FOR THE DOORS.
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This is a troubling story
Violent against politicians of either side is way too committed.
The story about the man who was planning to kill Kavanaugh was ignored because of what I saw and read 📚.
LIAR.
You WANTED Kavanaugh murdered so FJB could nominate another leftist Marxist not wit.
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse
July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 181 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.”
THIS GOT DELETED EARLIER BY A COWARD.
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse
July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 181 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.”
THIS GOT DELETED EARLIER BY A COWARD.
Trump’s Political Position Will Only Get Worse
July 1, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 181 Comments
David Rothkopf: “Mark it on your calendars. This was the week the meteoric political career of Donald Trump did what meteors often do and collided with planet Earth, leaving a large, ugly mark on the landscape.
“The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is itself more of a sign of his political collapse than it is of any strength he may have. The first time he ran for president, he did it because he thought it would boost his brand. This time he is likely to do it because he thinks it may make him more difficult to prosecute. And because he can use it to mount one last big attempt to fleece his supporters.”
THIS GOT DELETED EARLIER BY A COWARD.
No one is deleting you, you stupid pederast.
It’s a spam filter and since that’s all you post…..
CLAIM: If it weren’t for this ballot collection scheme, former President Donald Trump would have had enough votes to win the 2020 election.
THE FACTS: This alleged scheme has not been proven, nor do these researchers have any way of knowing whether any ballots that were collected contained votes for Trump or for Biden.
Funny how it went from...
no proof that anyone dropped multiple ballots
to
no proof that anyone dropped multiple ballots that were not from relatives or others whom gave them permission
to
no proof that these dropped ballots were Biden ballots
Either way...
Apparently the fact that is illegal is of no concern?
We ignore the laws being broken and spend all our time trying to "find" a crime to charge Republicans with.. like demanding that carrying an American flag is dangerous weapon worthy of years of jail time.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
PolitiFact reviewed the case files of approximately 430 defendants who were arrested and charged for their actions at the Capitol. We found several defendants who police say were found to have brought firearms with them. Some were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds
Who exactly are these "few" ?
funny the lying "fact checker" for the democrat party doesn't mention them
I know of one.
A man who brought his walking cane which could be a firearm if it had been loaded
It wasn't
out of tens if not hundreds of thousands of people...
odd for an "insurrection"
Oh, and no "smoking gun" either
ROFLMFAO at the lying "pastor"
who loves weasels and inuendo
and still no pictures or video
odd
but we sure know the Capitol Police were armed
They caused the deaths of 5 protestors
and still haven't released their video
I'm surprised the POS "pastor" isn't demanding it
sure would be if the situation was reversed
wonder why
not
Caliphate4vr said...
No one is deleting you, you stupid pederast.
It’s a spam filter and since that’s all you post…..
________
WHO'S "STUPID"?
Explain this:
POSTS 7:24,29,35,41,43,& 59 above were all orginally deleted, and they contained nothing but my OWN WORDS.
I got around it by not using my usual identity with blue print and photo, as seen in this post.
Court records and news reports show that many insurrectionists were armed, and several were charged with having firearms on Capitol grounds or stashed nearby while in Washington D.C. In addition, rioters had weapons other than firearms and used them during the attack.
Carefully worded phrase that basically admits...
There was nobody walking to the capitol actually carrying any guns. There were guns in a pickup truck and a couple of people had concealed guns (and apparently licences for them).
And the list of things that DC is charging these people with weapons charges include American flags, bicycle helmets, and flak jackets.
The fact that Trump may soon announce his candidacy for the presidency in the days ahead is
widely speculated to be on July 4th
and the lefty spin has already begun
Maybe that was the reason for the hasty Jan 6th unplanned "bombshell" hearing
That blew up in their faces
lefty desperation
ROFLMFAO !!!
Caliphate 4evr said
No one is deleting you stupid.
WHO'S "STUPID"?
posts 7:24,29,35,41,& 43 above were all IN MY OWN WORDS ONLY and were all originally deleted, and so was this one.
I can only get it to stick by abandoning my usual identity with blue print and photo, as here.
Ch seems to think that those who wouldn't go onto the Ellipse because the magnas would have made them give up their weapons must have laid those weapons down to walk to the Capitol.
My, that didn't get delted.
100 % Correct
LIAR.
You WANTED Kavanaugh murdered so FJB could nominate another leftist Marxist not wit.
deleted
Huh?
"delted"
posts 7:24,29,35,41,& 43 above were all IN MY OWN WORDS ONLY and were all originally deleted,
All those were found in the "Spam folder" from my comment area in Administration.
The reason they are back out there is because I chose to "publish" them.
The idea (in theory) is that the spam filter is supposed to "learn" from whether I publish or delete... which is why I continue to "publish" multiple comments that even might say the same thing. I don't want to encourage the spam filter on anything.
At least this is what Blogger Admin told me... to keep publishing and eventually it will learn.
But it is 2022 - and automated filters by social media to censor or toss things into spam is the new norm! Perhaps Reverend and Roger should use this frustration to understand how others feel when their tweets and such just "disappear" because someone else decided it needed to be censored.
Since it is now happening through AI and affecting everyone here...
We should all understand how destruction "censorship" is - regardless of the intent.
destructive not destruction
HOW CAN YOU SO BLATANTLY LIE, CH?
House Committee Describes Weapons Trump Supporters Had On Jan. 6, Including AR-15s
In a bombshell hearing about the Capitol attack, witness Cassidy Hutchinson said Donald Trump knew about his supporters carrying weapons on Jan 6.
Sarah Ruiz-Grossman
Jun 28, 2022, 03:05 PM EDT
In a surprise hearing of the House Jan. 6 committee, lawmakers played police radio transmissions identifying weapons — including AR-15s — that supporters of former President Donald Trump had with them on Jan. 6, 2021, the day of Trump’s rally and the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
In Tuesday’s hearing, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) — vice chair of the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack — played police transmissions that described people carrying firearms near the Ellipse in Washington, D.C., where Trump held his rally the morning of Jan. 6.
“Three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s... at 14th and Independence,” a voice says in one transmission.
“White male... stock of an AR-15,” someone can be heard saying in another recording. “Green fatigues... Glock-style pistols in their waistband.”
“Elevated threat in the trees... American flag face mask... weapon on the right-side hip,” a third transmission says.
Cheney noted that among the supporters who chose to pass through metal detectors so they could get closer to Trump, security screened weapons and equipment including pepper spray, knives, batons and gas masks. Several thousand more people did not go through metal detectors and watched from the nearby Washington Monument lawn.
The committee also showed a report sent by Secret Service at 11 a.m. that day warning of a man with a rifle near the Ellipse, where Trump was speaking.
In her surprise testimony Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, said that Tony Ornato ― who oversaw Secret Service movements ― said he told Trump there were people armed with weapons attending his rally on Jan. 6.
In videotaped testimony, Hutchinson recalled a meeting around 10 a.m. on Jan. 6 with Meadows and Ornato. At that meeting, she said, Ornato described people carrying knives, pistols, rifles, bear spray, body armor, spears and flagpoles. “Mark said, have you talked to the president?” Hutchinson said in her video testimony. “And Tony said yes.”
Later in her video testimony, Hutchinson said that Trump was angry about the crowd size. He wanted more people in the area where he was speaking, and he blamed the metal detectors, she said.
“I don’t f-ing care that they have weapons,” Trump said, per Hutchinson. “They’re not here to hurt me ... Take the f-ing mags away... Let my people in, they can march to the Capitol from here.”
Last year, Trump told Fox News that “there were no guns whatsoever” in the crowd on Jan. 6.
An armed mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol that day as lawmakers gathered to certify the 2020 presidential election, which Joe Biden won. Before the riot, Trump incited the crowd at his nearby rally by falsely claiming the election had been stolen. Five people died in the ensuing mayhem and its aftermath, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer.
Trump didn't f'ing care that they had the weapons he later claimed they did not have.
Weapons he would have allowed them to bring into the crowd at the Ellipse, the crowd he later sent marching to the Capitol.
LIE UPON COMPOUNDED LIE!
You just deleted the long politico fact chedk I posted, you coward.
No, the only reason they are back out there is because I myself published them without using my usual identity and photo. As here.
HERE'S THE ARTICLE CH DELETED.
_________
HOW CAN YOU LIE SO BLATANTLY, CH?
House Committee Describes Weapons Trump Supporters Had On Jan. 6, Including AR-15s
In a bombshell hearing about the Capitol attack, witness Cassidy Hutchinson said Donald Trump knew about his supporters carrying weapons on Jan 6.
by Sarah Ruiz-Grossman
Jun 28, 2022, 03:05 PM EDT
In a surprise hearing of the House Jan. 6 committee, lawmakers played police radio transmissions identifying weapons — including AR-15s — that supporters of former President Donald Trump had with them on Jan. 6, 2021, the day of Trump’s rally and the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“Three men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15s... at 14th and Independence,” a voice says in one transmission.
“White male... stock of an AR-15,” someone can be heard saying in another recording. “Green fatigues... Glock-style pistols in their waistband.”
“Elevated threat in the trees... American flag face mask... weapon on the right-side hip,” a third transmission says.
Cheney noted that among the supporters who chose to pass through metal detectors so they could get closer to Trump, security screened weapons and equipment including pepper spray, knives, batons and gas masks. Several thousand more people did not go through metal detectors and watched from the nearby Washington Monument lawn.
WONDER WHY?
The committee also showed a report sent by Secret Service at 11 a.m. that day warning of a man with a rifle near the Ellipse, where Trump was speaking.
In her surprise testimony Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson, a top aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, said that Tony Ornato ― who oversaw Secret Service movements ― said he told Trump there were people armed with weapons attending his rally on Jan. 6.
In videotaped testimony, Hutchinson recalled a meeting around 10 a.m. on Jan. 6 with Meadows and Ornato. At that meeting, she said, Ornato described people carrying knives, pistols, rifles, bear spray, body armor, spears and flagpoles. “Mark said, have you talked to the president?” Hutchinson said in her video testimony. “And Tony said yes.”
Later in her video testimony, Hutchinson said that Trump was angry about the crowd size. He wanted more people in the area where he was speaking, and he blamed the metal detectors, she said.
“I don’t f-ing care that they have weapons,” Trump said, per Hutchinson. “They’re not here to hurt me ... Take the f-ing mags away... Let my people in, they can march to the Capitol from here.”
Last year, Trump told Fox News that “there were no guns whatsoever” in the crowd on Jan. 6.
An armed mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol that day as lawmakers gathered to certify the 2020 presidential election, which Joe Biden won. Before the riot, Trump incited the crowd at his nearby rally by falsely claiming the election had been stolen. Five people died in the ensuing mayhem and its aftermath, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer.
What blantant liars you and Trump both are.
He had been told there were weapons among those who held back from the Ellipse because they did not want their weapons conficated, yet he wanted them to be let through armed the join the crowd he was about to send marching to the Capitol.
OH THE HISTORIANS WILL HAVE A FIELD DAY WITH THIS!
confiscated
I spend time explaining the spam filter...
the fact that blogger is now like every other social media forum getting involved with filtering and editing comments...
The the fucking idiot Reverend...
Doesn't bother to read or cannot understand...
and then gets mad at me?
I am the only reason these comments "reappear".
Blame Blogger and the new 2022 excessive need for someone third party (or AI) to "censor and filter" everything.
Free speech is gone!
Reverend is feeling the brunt and is pissed off at the wrong people.
I just had to "publish" seven more spam filter comments.
I'm not mad. I'm DELIGHTED to shine the light of truth through your attempted obfuscations.
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1542547903687819268?t=Bb6u_ni4DHNmg0lvzZhnCw&s=19
Even on Newsmax he looks unhinged
He just deleted this:
I'm not mad. I'm DELIGHTED to shine the light of truth through your attempted obfuscations.
Well Reverend...
Everyone else here understands that this is a spam filter.
Why is it that this is beyond your grasp?
Perhaps I just won't bother publishing any of yours.. as I do for Roger, Rat, Cali and everyone else that gets caught in there from time to time...
Why is it that EVERYTHING
Is a fucking PERSONAL ATTACK with you???
Is that you or your church that created that need?
He actually hasn't deleted me today yet
But a Pultzer Prise writer says that.
Democrats room to criticize their leaders and, if they choose, take a stand on principle.
The Republican Party is a far more monolithic entity, in which politicians compete over who adheres most faithfully to the party’s line. That line used to be defined by economic ideology, but these days it is more about positioning in the culture wars — and personal loyalty to Trump. It takes great moral courage for Republicans to defy the party’s diktats, and those who do are promptly excommunicated.
Unfortunately you don't have the courage 😔
Roger, I start out posting here, using my usual name and photo and yes, often C & P's from politicalwire, and it goes along fine (and I publish far less of that than Roger does). And then I post something of my own that's REALLY cutting and it doesn't appear.
So then I try again, but I can ONLY get it to appear by using a different nomenclature and no photo.
Why would the spam filter kick in when I am posting my own comments, as I did in the list above, all of which I had to go back and get to stay by using a different version of my identity?
Even If the Democrats are just a coalition of interest groups, Republicans are now a coalition of crazies and cowards. And it’s hard to say which Republicans present the greater danger.
But unfortunately Scott has joined the cult.
Even the Governor of Arkansas said that he is a clear and present danger to American.
Notice that Roger and James don't understand technology, is it an OLD AGE THINGY?
Madam Buttigeg is fucking up everything that transports good, services and People.
She knows nothing about the job.
Thousands of Flights are being Cancelled..
Post a Comment