Holy shit bat man......LIL Schtiiy's massive misogyny complex on full view with his alleged sunday funnies!!!!! I wonder if his child bride knows how little he respects women and wants them to serve his every need while paying homage to his superior intellect and views!!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
LIZ CHENEY SAYS THE GOP MUST CHOOSE and SO FAR IT'S LARGELY CHOSING WRONGLY
You guys can yell "kagaroo court" till you're blue in the face, but the American people know a measured, careful principled investigation when they see it.
The American people know a political farce when they see it. Everyone knows there is a complete absence of any form of rebuttal, defense, cross examination or counter argument. Now you can pretend this is not the case until you are blue in the face. But there's a reason why so few are watching.
Harvard Professor Says Trump Will Likely Be Indicted July 3, 2022 at 6:53 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 12 Comments
Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe told CNN he thought an indictment of Donald Trump was likely.
Said Tribe: “There’s indication—certainly from the searches and seizures of both John Eastman and of others—strong evidence that the Justice Department is not stopping with the foot soldiers, it’s going to the Generals. And the biggest General of all, of course, is Donald Trump. I do think the odds are he will be indicted.
However, Tribe said the committee members are presented with a lose-lose situation. If they do indict Trump, there will be violence. If they don’t, they “invite another violent insurrection.” _______
WHOA. GET THIS STRAIGHT. IT WILL NOT BE THE COMMITTEE INDICTING TRUMP. IT WILL BE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING TO PROTECT THE CONSITUTION AND THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA.
rebuttal, defense, cross examination or counter argument.
BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! Gee asshole, do you not understand that this is not a trial????? LOLOLOL......All you losers have yelled to date is that all the witnesses are liars without a shred of evidence....no differerentr than trump won!!!!!!!!
This is not a trial. It is an investigation. There will be plenty of opportunities for Trump's legal counsel to offer "rebuttal, defense, cross examination and counter argument" when he goes on trial.
Professor jonathan Turley "condemned Trump's speech before the riot on Twitter when it was still being given and opposed the challenge to the electoral votes from the outset. He argued for a bipartisan, bicameral vote of censure to condemn Trump for the harm that he caused the nation with his speech.Turley declined to represent President Trump but did speak to Republican senators before both the first Trump trial and the second Trump trial." --Wikipedia
Wiki also points out that Turley is a close friend of William Barr. _______
My statement: Turley wants Trump given only a slight slap on the wrist for what he did. The Justice Department may disagree.
Hate to burst your bubble, but Turley commands far more respect around Washington than the partisan Tribe. Your cherry picked quote ignores the great many commentaries Turley has put forth over the years .
You're entitled to your views, albeit unsupported by anything more than hearsay and accusations. But Indy and working class voters aren't buying it.
Former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said: “A lot of people want to put a tombstone on the grave but Donald Trump is still above ground. He’s still walking the earth and has a lot of political clout with a lot more people inside the party than folks may want to admit.
Advertisement
“Those bridges are in front of us. We haven’t come to them yet to see exactly what these extra revelations will now present in terms of further chiseling away Donald Trump’s hold on the party.”
Some Democrats argue that DeSantis would be preferable because, unlike Trump, he would not threaten the foundations of America’s constitutional democracy.
But Steele warned: “Who’s the better thief, the one who breaks the window to get into your house or the one who’s craftily picked the lock? DeSantis knows how not to trip the alarm system.”
You keep saying I am entitled to my views. Gee, thanks. So is every American.
But no one is entitled to get away with an attempt to overthrow democracy. And that is a legal matter, subject to investigation and possible indictment.
We can no longer avoid a criminal investigation into Donald Trump
By the Editorial Board
July 2, 2022 at 7:00 a.m. EDT
After another week of riveting testimony before the House Jan. 6 committee, it is natural to wonder: How many laws were broken, by whom, and will there be prosecutions? Some argue that former president Donald Trump is undoubtedly guilty of serious crimes and must be tried. Others insist that the criminal case against Mr. Trump still is not airtight, and that prosecuting a former president would tear apart the country. What is beyond doubt is that an intensive criminal investigation must proceed.
The committee heard June 28 from Cassidy Hutchinson, who was a top Trump White House aide. Ms. Hutchinson said that Mr. Trump instructed his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, to talk to conservative provocateur Roger Stone the night before the Capitol attack. Mr. Stone was photographed on Jan. 6 with members of the far-right Oath Keepers organization, multiple members of which were allegedly involved in the assault. She said that she heard mention of the Oath Keepers and the fringe Proud Boys group during the run-up to Jan. 6, when Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani was around.
Ms. Hutchinson also testified that Mr. Meadows sought to attend a Jan. 5 “war room” that included Mr. Giuliani, former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon and other extremists. She said Mr. Meadows relented after she protested that the White House chief of staff should not be involved, but that he said he would dial in to the meetings.
This testimony underscores questions about precisely what Mr. Trump and his senior staff knew about what would unfold the next day.
Ms. Hutchinson testified that, on Jan. 6 itself, Mr. Trump was told that the crowd that he had assembled was armed. He nevertheless urged the mob to march on the Capitol, fight and show strength — and, according to Ms. Hutchinson and by his own admission, Mr. Trump wanted to accompany them.
The public needs more information. That requires the committee to hear from more witnesses, which in turn requires the Justice Department to prosecute those, such as Mr. Meadows, who have defied committee subpoenas. It also means the department should examine seriously concerns that Trump allies are trying to influence Jan. 6 committee witnesses.
And, yes, the department should conduct a criminal investigation of Mr. Trump himself. Attorney General Merrick Garland appears to be treating this prospect with a high degree of care, and appropriately so. A new administration prosecuting a former president of the opposite party would set a perilous precedent; one need only look at the long record of failed democracies abroad, in which new leaders tried those they deposed, to see the danger. Prosecuting Mr. Trump also risks helping him politically.
On the other hand, if Mr. Trump is clearly, unquestionably guilty of committing a serious crime — not just arguably so — the department might have little choice. Central to our system of justice is the principle that no one is above the law.
The Justice Department has investigative powers that the Jan. 6 committee does not, and there are critical questions that remain unanswered. Mr. Garland should have no higher priority than using these powers to investigate all of those involved in one of the darkest days in American history.
This is the first time in history that a major 📰 has advocated a criminal trial on a former President of the United States of America and for which it stands for all Americans of any origin.
This is why we must set a precidet that no future President can do this without getting arrested and prosecuted.
Mr. Trump was told that the crowd that he had assembled was armed. He nevertheless urged the mob to march on the Capitol, fight and show strength — and, according to Ms. Hutchinson and by his own admission, Mr. Trump wanted to accompany them.
History shows the consequences of this allegation.
The collapse of a democracy because they are fragile.
It's November, 2024, and the presidential race between Biden and DeSantis has been tabulated by the states and called by the networks. Biden won 84,355,740 votes to DeSantis' 77,366,412, clearly carrying the popular vote. But the popular vote isn't enough: George W. Bush lost to Al Gore by a half-million votes and Donald Trump lost to Hillary Clinton by 3 million votes but both ended up in the White House. What matters is the Electoral College vote, and that looks good for Biden, too. As CNN is reporting, the outcome is a virtual clone of the 2020 election: Biden carries the same states he did that year and DeSantis gets all the Trump states. It's 306 to 232 in the Electoral College, a 74-vote Electoral College lead for Biden, at least as calculated by CNN and the rest of the media. Biden is heading to the White House for another 4 years. Until the announcement comes out of Georgia. Although Biden won the popular vote in Georgia, their legislature decided it can overrule the popular vote and just awarded the state's 16 electoral votes to DeSantis instead of Biden.
An hour later we hear from five other states with Republican-controlled legislatures where Biden won the majority of the vote, just like he had in 2020: North Carolina (15 electoral votes), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (16), Pennsylvania (20) and Arizona (11). Each has followed Georgia's lead and their legislatures have awarded their Electoral College votes—even though Biden won the popular vote in each state—to DeSantis. Thus, a total of 88 Electoral College votes from those six states move from Biden to DeSantis, who's declared the winner and will be sworn in on January 20, 2025. Wolf Blitzer announces that DeSantis has won the election, and people pour into the streets to protest. They're met with a hail of bullets as Republican-affiliated militias have been rehearsing for this exact moment and their allies among the police refuse to intervene. After a few thousand people lay dead in the streets of two dozen cities, the police begin to round up the surviving "instigators," who are charged with seditious conspiracy for resisting the Republican legislatures of their states. After he's sworn in on January 20th, President DeSantis points to the ongoing demonstrations, declares a permanent state of emergency, and suspends future elections, just as Trump had repeatedly told the world he planned for 2020
An hour later we hear from five other states with Republican-controlled legislatures where Biden won the majority of the vote, just like he had in 2020: North Carolina (15 electoral votes), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (16), Pennsylvania (20) and Arizona (11). Each has followed Georgia's lead and their legislatures have awarded their Electoral College votes—even though Biden won the popular vote in each state—to DeSantis. Thus, a total of 88 Electoral College votes from those six states move from Biden to DeSantis, who's declared the winner and will be sworn in on January 20, 2025. Wolf Blitzer announces that DeSantis has won the election, and people pour into the streets to protest. They're met with a hail of bullets as Republican-affiliated militias have been rehearsing for this exact moment and their allies among the police refuse to intervene. After a few thousand people lay dead in the streets of two dozen cities, the police begin to round up the surviving "instigators," who are charged with seditious conspiracy for resisting the Republican legislatures of their states. After he's sworn in on January 20th, President DeSantis points to the ongoing demonstrations, declares a permanent state of emergency, and suspends future elections, just as Trump had repeatedly told the world he planned for 2020
Six Republicans on the Supreme Court just announced—a story that has largely flown under the nation's political radar—that they'll consider pre-rigging the presidential election of 2024.
Republican strategists are gaming out which states have Republican legislatures willing to override the votes of their people to win the White House for the Republican candidate.
Here's how one aspect of it could work out, if they go along with the GOP's arguments that will be before the Court this October:
If two of the the three appointees by Trump doesn't overturn that piece of legislation, this scheme will destroy the United States of America.
As the highly respected conservative Judge J. Michael Luttig recently wrote:
"Trump and the Republicans can only be stopped from stealing the 2024 election at this point if the Supreme Court rejects the independent state legislature doctrine … and Congress amends the Electoral Count Act to constrain Congress' own power to reject state electoral votes and decide the presidency."
I take no satisfaction in having accurately predicted—in March of 2020—how Trump and his buddies would try to steal the election in January of 2021. Or how the Supreme Court would blow up the Environmental Protection Agency.
Trump's January 6th effort failed because every contested state had laws on the books requiring all of their Electoral College votes to go to whichever candidate won the popular vote in the state.
That will not be the case in 2024.
As we are watching, the Supreme Court—in collaboration with state legislatures through activists like Ginny Thomas—are setting that election up right now in front of us in real time.
We damn well better be planning for this, because it's likely coming our way in just a bit more than two short years
THOMAS HARTMANN: As the highly respected conservative Judge J. Michael Luttig recently wrote:
"Trump and the Republicans can only be stopped from stealing the 2024 election at this point if the Supreme Court rejects the independent state legislature doctrine … and Congress amends the Electoral Count Act to constrain Congress' own power to reject state electoral votes and decide the presidency."
THOMAS HARTMANN: I take no satisfaction in having accurately predicted—in March of 2020—how Trump and his buddies would try to steal the election in January of 2021. Or how the Supreme Court would blow up the Environmental Protection Agency.
Trump's January 6th effort failed because every contested state had laws on the books requiring all of their Electoral College votes to go to whichever candidate won the popular vote in the state.
That will not be the case in 2024.
As we are watching, the Supreme Court—in collaboration with state legislatures through activists like Ginny Thomas—are setting that election up right now in front of us in real time.
We damn well better be planning for this, because it's likely coming our way in just a bit more than two short years
My statement: Having failed to steal this election, the stealing of the next election is being set up by some conservatives. We must stop it, as the respected conservative judge Michael Luttig warns us all.
Proving without a shadow of doubt that facts do not matter in fucked ups world of delusional and fantasy!!!!!!!! Maybe he can post the proof of trumps victory instead of pure speculation he hears on the inter web!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!
We certainly know you are with your idiotic conspiracy BS and believing every lie that trump tells you to embrace!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! The spam is yours fucked up....with every POS tweet you post as your opinion!!!!!!!!
Anonymous Honest pastor said... I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
CHT's spam folder is populated every time you are here
Any connection there ?
the "pastor" is energy bunny level stupid
did you ever post those pictures and videos of "armed insurrectionists" roaming around on jan 6th you keep claiming ?
guess they were "censored"
those criminals must have been caught in some of the 14,000 hours of unreleased video, right
release them unedited and we shall see
along with what actions the Capitol Police did
and who was there and what they were doing
like Ray Epps
and FBI agents
funny Wray doesn't want to identify them though court testimony has shown them to exist
Won't even answer questions from Senators about them
odd
Surely the committee has gotten to the bottom of this
Trump wanted the mags turned off so his armed supporters could join the Ellipse crowd that he later sent marching to the Capitol to "fight like hell" to overthrow the election, yet later he lied that there were no weapons among any of his supporters.
Let him defend that in court under oath and with cross examination.
Yes, Justice Department, he DESERVES the day in court he earlier wanted!
Yes you are in spades fucked up....Only morons and trump dick suckers still believe he won.....still waiting for your post proving his victory!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!
77 comments:
Two Words not Associated with Biden.
"Americans Prosperity"
Holy shit bat man......LIL Schtiiy's massive misogyny complex on full view with his alleged sunday funnies!!!!! I wonder if his child bride knows how little he respects women and wants them to serve his every need while paying homage to his superior intellect and views!!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
LIZ CHENEY SAYS THE GOP MUST CHOOSE
and SO FAR IT'S LARGELY CHOSING WRONGLY
You guys can yell "kagaroo court" till you're blue in the face, but the American people know a measured, careful principled investigation when they see it.
Trump will still have his day in court.
That's what terrifies him and you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmJDShboleo
Notice how many of those "Sunday funnies" are TOTAL BOSH with NO DEPTH OF THOUGHT OR TRUTH at all.
Ch scrapes the bottom of the barrel.
The American people know a political farce when they see it. Everyone knows there is a complete absence of any form of rebuttal, defense, cross examination or counter argument. Now you can pretend this is not the case until you are blue in the face. But there's a reason why so few are watching.
Harvard Professor Says Trump Will Likely Be Indicted
July 3, 2022 at 6:53 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 12 Comments
Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe told CNN he thought an indictment of Donald Trump was likely.
Said Tribe:
“There’s indication—certainly from the searches and seizures of both John Eastman and of others—strong evidence that the Justice Department is not stopping with the foot soldiers, it’s going to the Generals. And the biggest General of all, of course, is Donald Trump. I do think the odds are he will be indicted.
However, Tribe said the committee members are presented with a lose-lose situation. If they do indict Trump, there will be violence. If they don’t, they “invite another violent insurrection.”
_______
WHOA. GET THIS STRAIGHT. IT WILL NOT BE THE COMMITTEE INDICTING TRUMP. IT WILL BE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING TO PROTECT THE CONSITUTION AND THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA.
rebuttal, defense, cross examination or counter argument.
BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! Gee asshole, do you not understand that this is not a trial????? LOLOLOL......All you losers have yelled to date is that all the witnesses are liars without a shred of evidence....no differerentr than trump won!!!!!!!!
You keep repeating yet another BIG LIE.
This is not a trial. It is an investigation. There will be plenty of opportunities for Trump's legal counsel to offer "rebuttal, defense, cross examination and counter argument" when he goes on trial.
Professor Jonathan Turley disagrees
I never said it was a trial. What I said was factual. There's a complete lack of balance. America sees it and doesn't care for it.
Professor jonathan Turley
"condemned Trump's speech before the riot on Twitter when it was still being given and opposed the challenge to the electoral votes from the outset. He argued for a bipartisan, bicameral vote of censure to condemn Trump for the harm that he caused the nation with his speech.Turley declined to represent President Trump but did speak to Republican senators before both the first Trump trial and the second Trump trial."
--Wikipedia
Wiki also points out that Turley is a close friend of William Barr.
_______
My statement:
Turley wants Trump given only a slight slap on the wrist for what he did. The Justice Department may disagree.
Hate to burst your bubble, but Turley commands far more respect around Washington than the partisan Tribe. Your cherry picked quote ignores the great many commentaries Turley has put forth over the years .
You're entitled to your views, albeit unsupported by anything more than hearsay and accusations. But Indy and working class voters aren't buying it.
Former Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said: “A lot of people want to put a tombstone on the grave but Donald Trump is still above ground. He’s still walking the earth and has a lot of political clout with a lot more people inside the party than folks may want to admit.
Advertisement
“Those bridges are in front of us. We haven’t come to them yet to see exactly what these extra revelations will now present in terms of further chiseling away Donald Trump’s hold on the party.”
Some Democrats argue that DeSantis would be preferable because, unlike Trump, he would not threaten the foundations of America’s constitutional democracy.
But Steele warned: “Who’s the better thief, the one who breaks the window to get into your house or the one who’s craftily picked the lock? DeSantis knows how not to trip the alarm system.”
You keep saying I am entitled to my views. Gee, thanks. So is every American.
But no one is entitled to get away with an attempt to overthrow democracy. And that is a legal matter, subject to investigation and possible indictment.
Followed by an actual trial.
The Washington Post
We can no longer avoid a criminal investigation into Donald Trump
By the Editorial Board
July 2, 2022 at 7:00 a.m. EDT
After another week of riveting testimony before the House Jan. 6 committee, it is natural to wonder: How many laws were broken, by whom, and will there be prosecutions? Some argue that former president Donald Trump is undoubtedly guilty of serious crimes and must be tried. Others insist that the criminal case against Mr. Trump still is not airtight, and that prosecuting a former president would tear apart the country. What is beyond doubt is that an intensive criminal investigation must proceed.
The committee heard June 28 from Cassidy Hutchinson, who was a top Trump White House aide. Ms. Hutchinson said that Mr. Trump instructed his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, to talk to conservative provocateur Roger Stone the night before the Capitol attack. Mr. Stone was photographed on Jan. 6 with members of the far-right Oath Keepers organization, multiple members of which were allegedly involved in the assault. She said that she heard mention of the Oath Keepers and the fringe Proud Boys group during the run-up to Jan. 6, when Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani was around.
Ms. Hutchinson also testified that Mr. Meadows sought to attend a Jan. 5 “war room” that included Mr. Giuliani, former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon and other extremists. She said Mr. Meadows relented after she protested that the White House chief of staff should not be involved, but that he said he would dial in to the meetings.
This testimony underscores questions about precisely what Mr. Trump and his senior staff knew about what would unfold the next day.
Ms. Hutchinson testified that, on Jan. 6 itself, Mr. Trump was told that the crowd that he had assembled was armed. He nevertheless urged the mob to march on the Capitol, fight and show strength — and, according to Ms. Hutchinson and by his own admission, Mr. Trump wanted to accompany them.
The public needs more information. That requires the committee to hear from more witnesses, which in turn requires the Justice Department to prosecute those, such as Mr. Meadows, who have defied committee subpoenas. It also means the department should examine seriously concerns that Trump allies are trying to influence Jan. 6 committee witnesses.
And, yes, the department should conduct a criminal investigation of Mr. Trump himself. Attorney General Merrick Garland appears to be treating this prospect with a high degree of care, and appropriately so. A new administration prosecuting a former president of the opposite party would set a perilous precedent; one need only look at the long record of failed democracies abroad, in which new leaders tried those they deposed, to see the danger. Prosecuting Mr. Trump also risks helping him politically.
On the other hand, if Mr. Trump is clearly, unquestionably guilty of committing a serious crime — not just arguably so — the department might have little choice. Central to our system of justice is the principle that no one is above the law.
The Justice Department has investigative powers that the Jan. 6 committee does not, and there are critical questions that remain unanswered. Mr. Garland should have no higher priority than using these powers to investigate all of those involved in one of the darkest days in American history.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/02/donald-trump-criminal-investigation-jan-6/
This is the first time in history that a major 📰 has advocated a criminal trial on a former President of the United States of America and for which it stands for all Americans of any origin.
This is why we must set a precidet that no future President can do this without getting arrested and prosecuted.
Mr. Trump was told that the crowd that he had assembled was armed. He nevertheless urged the mob to march on the Capitol, fight and show strength — and, according to Ms. Hutchinson and by his own admission, Mr. Trump wanted to accompany them.
History shows the consequences of this allegation.
The collapse of a democracy because they are fragile.
Proper investigations pursue the truth, not a single minded, pre-determined outcome while ignoring other very relevant factors.
This is another hateful vendetta by the most partisan, vindictive house speaker in history.
So sorry I can't stay to watch you and Roger spam this thread into oblivion. I'm to to teach a Kung fu class while you guys live your lives here.
It's November, 2024, and the presidential race between Biden and DeSantis has been tabulated by the states and called by the networks. Biden won 84,355,740 votes to DeSantis' 77,366,412, clearly carrying the popular vote.
But the popular vote isn't enough: George W. Bush lost to Al Gore by a half-million votes and Donald Trump lost to Hillary Clinton by 3 million votes but both ended up in the White House. What matters is the Electoral College vote, and that looks good for Biden, too.
As CNN is reporting, the outcome is a virtual clone of the 2020 election: Biden carries the same states he did that year and DeSantis gets all the Trump states. It's 306 to 232 in the Electoral College, a 74-vote Electoral College lead for Biden, at least as calculated by CNN and the rest of the media. Biden is heading to the White House for another 4 years.
Until the announcement comes out of Georgia. Although Biden won the popular vote in Georgia, their legislature decided it can overrule the popular vote and just awarded the state's 16 electoral votes to DeSantis instead of Biden.
An hour later we hear from five other states with Republican-controlled legislatures where Biden won the majority of the vote, just like he had in 2020: North Carolina (15 electoral votes), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (16), Pennsylvania (20) and Arizona (11).
Each has followed Georgia's lead and their legislatures have awarded their Electoral College votes—even though Biden won the popular vote in each state—to DeSantis.
Thus, a total of 88 Electoral College votes from those six states move from Biden to DeSantis, who's declared the winner and will be sworn in on January 20, 2025.
Wolf Blitzer announces that DeSantis has won the election, and people pour into the streets to protest. They're met with a hail of bullets as Republican-affiliated militias have been rehearsing for this exact moment and their allies among the police refuse to intervene.
After a few thousand people lay dead in the streets of two dozen cities, the police begin to round up the surviving "instigators," who are charged with seditious conspiracy for resisting the Republican legislatures of their states.
After he's sworn in on January 20th, President DeSantis points to the ongoing demonstrations, declares a permanent state of emergency, and suspends future elections, just as Trump had repeatedly told the world he planned for 2020
The bottom line is that our electoral college system must be replaced with a popular national vote system.
An hour later we hear from five other states with Republican-controlled legislatures where Biden won the majority of the vote, just like he had in 2020: North Carolina (15 electoral votes), Wisconsin (10), Michigan (16), Pennsylvania (20) and Arizona (11).
Each has followed Georgia's lead and their legislatures have awarded their Electoral College votes—even though Biden won the popular vote in each state—to DeSantis.
Thus, a total of 88 Electoral College votes from those six states move from Biden to DeSantis, who's declared the winner and will be sworn in on January 20, 2025.
Wolf Blitzer announces that DeSantis has won the election, and people pour into the streets to protest. They're met with a hail of bullets as Republican-affiliated militias have been rehearsing for this exact moment and their allies among the police refuse to intervene.
After a few thousand people lay dead in the streets of two dozen cities, the police begin to round up the surviving "instigators," who are charged with seditious conspiracy for resisting the Republican legislatures of their states.
After he's sworn in on January 20th, President DeSantis points to the ongoing demonstrations, declares a permanent state of emergency, and suspends future elections, just as Trump had repeatedly told the world he planned for 2020
https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-election/
Thom Hartmann
Anonymous Myballs said...
Professor Jonathan Turley disagreeS
SOOOOOOOOO FUCKING WHAT!!!!!!! YOU STILL THINK TRUMP WON WITH NO PROOF WHATSOEVER!!!!!!!
Six Republicans on the Supreme Court just announced—a story that has largely flown under the nation's political radar—that they'll consider pre-rigging the presidential election of 2024.
Republican strategists are gaming out which states have Republican legislatures willing to override the votes of their people to win the White House for the Republican candidate.
Here's how one aspect of it could work out, if they go along with the GOP's arguments that will be before the Court this October:
If two of the the three appointees by Trump doesn't overturn that piece of legislation, this scheme will destroy the United States of America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_ncw-5NZsE
This is another hateful vendetta by the most partisan, vindictive house speaker in history.
BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! At you again ballz.....your opinion is nothing more than a gaping asshole of being stupid!!!!!!!!!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/2-secret-sources-told-cnn-203355102.html
Sorry how you slurpers grab onto the She's lying mantra when all know trump is a short tempered hot head!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
This is a proper investigation that is pursuing the truth. Resistance is from the Republicans.
They can always set the record straight by testifying under oath.
As the highly respected conservative Judge J. Michael Luttig recently wrote:
"Trump and the Republicans can only be stopped from stealing the 2024 election at this point if the Supreme Court rejects the independent state legislature doctrine … and Congress amends the Electoral Count Act to constrain Congress' own power to reject state electoral votes and decide the presidency."
I take no satisfaction in having accurately predicted—in March of 2020—how Trump and his buddies would try to steal the election in January of 2021. Or how the Supreme Court would blow up the Environmental Protection Agency.
Trump's January 6th effort failed because every contested state had laws on the books requiring all of their Electoral College votes to go to whichever candidate won the popular vote in the state.
That will not be the case in 2024.
As we are watching, the Supreme Court—in collaboration with state legislatures through activists like Ginny Thomas—are setting that election up right now in front of us in real time.
We damn well better be planning for this, because it's likely coming our way in just a bit more than two short years
https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-election/
The lying disHonest, indecent, untruthful Rev. said...
You keep repeating yet another BIG LIE.
This is not a trial. It is an investigation
Investigations look at both sides and all evidence
they don't rush to judgement
they don't schedule prime time propaganda shows and read from teleprompters
they don't edit evidence to fit their desired outcome
calling this an "investigation is a REALLY BIG LIE
by the pathological liar Boswell
what a POS
on display again
THOMAS HARTMANN:
As the highly respected conservative Judge J. Michael Luttig recently wrote:
"Trump and the Republicans can only be stopped from stealing the 2024 election at this point if the Supreme Court rejects the independent state legislature doctrine … and Congress amends the Electoral Count Act to constrain Congress' own power to reject state electoral votes and decide the presidency."
THOMAS HARTMANN:
I take no satisfaction in having accurately predicted—in March of 2020—how Trump and his buddies would try to steal the election in January of 2021. Or how the Supreme Court would blow up the Environmental Protection Agency.
Trump's January 6th effort failed because every contested state had laws on the books requiring all of their Electoral College votes to go to whichever candidate won the popular vote in the state.
That will not be the case in 2024.
As we are watching, the Supreme Court—in collaboration with state legislatures through activists like Ginny Thomas—are setting that election up right now in front of us in real time.
We damn well better be planning for this, because it's likely coming our way in just a bit more than two short years
Pursuing the truth would entail putting the person in charge of security under oath.
And obtaining her texts and emails like they are doing to "defendants"
Releasing all unedited video evidence
Having full disclosure of FBI and Capitol Police activities
for starters
What did Nancy know and when did she know it ?
I suspect that like the Mueller "investigation" all the Jan 6th texts will be mysteriously permanently wiped from their phones
Banana Republic
Kangaroo Court
Worse than 3rd world legal system
My statement:
Having failed to steal this election, the stealing of the next election is being set up by some conservatives. We must stop it, as the respected conservative judge Michael Luttig warns us all.
Trump earlier said he wanted his day in court. I gladly say, YES! Let's give him exactly that!
F Daddy shows up and this post immediately got deleted:
I put it here under another name:
_______
Trump earlier said he wanted his day in court. I gladly say, YES! Let's give him exactly that.
A fair justice system would not lock up "paraders" and trespassers for lengthy periods without a speedy trial.
And not squeeze those people until they have no resources left
And not have a "trial" with partisan judges and juries
actually beyond partisan
as you can see here, these democrats are lunatics
and flail out false charges left and right
"censorship" on the CHT blog
"armed insurrection"
"Trump is a white supremacist"
"Trump gave a Golden Shower"
"Trump blah blah blah
etc etc.
What did Nancy know and when did she know it ?
Proving without a shadow of doubt that facts do not matter in fucked ups world of delusional and fantasy!!!!!!!! Maybe he can post the proof of trumps victory instead of pure speculation he hears on the inter web!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!
Don't worry. Trump will get his day in court.
And he is alaready welcome at any time to come before the committee and testify.
already
*A fair justice system would give the defendants access to all evidence.
Before the trial or "plea"
not in Biden's America and "justice system"
or the lying POS "pastor's"
hey "pastor" you are obviously being flagged for spamming and put under stricter watch by google software
why don't you own up to it ?
you may be putting the whole blog under increased scrutiny, along with roger
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and I got deleted. Any connection there?
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
Will Joe have a chance to testify under oath along with Hunter ?
He's welcome anytime
great legal "advice" "pastor"
and there is actual physical evidence present on the case against him
if the FBI would ever look at what was given to them
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
CHT's spam folder is populated every time you are here
Any connection there ?
are you this fucking stupid ?
Well with your positions you obviously are
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
This just got deleted too.
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
That just got deleted too, when posted with my name and picture.
Not spam, my own comments.
are you this fucking stupid ?
We certainly know you are with your idiotic conspiracy BS and believing every lie that trump tells you to embrace!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! The spam is yours fucked up....with every POS tweet you post as your opinion!!!!!!!!
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
The bottom line is that our electoral college system must be replaced with a popular national vote system.
Pass the amendment or STFU, boozehound
Anonymous Honest pastor said...
I posted all the above with name and picture without being deleted. You showed up and immediately I was deleted. Any connection there?
CHT's spam folder is populated every time you are here
Any connection there ?
the "pastor" is energy bunny level stupid
did you ever post those pictures and videos of "armed insurrectionists" roaming around on jan 6th you keep claiming ?
guess they were "censored"
those criminals must have been caught in some of the 14,000 hours of unreleased video, right
release them unedited and we shall see
along with what actions the Capitol Police did
and who was there and what they were doing
like Ray Epps
and FBI agents
funny Wray doesn't want to identify them though court testimony has shown them to exist
Won't even answer questions from Senators about them
odd
Surely the committee has gotten to the bottom of this
over the past year and a half
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
are you this fucking stupid ?
ask this and immediately VERY lo iq shows up
coincidence ?
ROFLMFAO !!!
Let's see if this gets deleted too:
Trump says he wants his day in court. I say, YES! Let's give him exactly that, Department of Justice.
lets see if this gets deleted too:
the "pastor" is energy bunny level stupid
did you ever post those pictures and videos of "armed insurrectionists" roaming around on jan 6th you keep claiming ?
guess they were "censored"
those criminals must have been caught in some of the 14,000 hours of unreleased video, right
release them unedited and we shall see
along with what actions the Capitol Police did
and who was there and what they were doing
like Ray Epps
and FBI agents
funny Wray doesn't want to identify them though court testimony has shown them to exist
Won't even answer questions from Senators about them
odd
Surely the committee has gotten to the bottom of this
over the past year and a half
testing, testing
1-2-3
feel free to post those pictures "pastor"
or admit you are a pathological liar, though we all know that
Pedo and Alky still think 01/06 is helping their cause, when all I see are pissed off shoppers
Trump wanted the mags turned off so his armed supporters could join the Ellipse crowd that he later sent marching to the Capitol to "fight like hell" to overthrow the election, yet later he lied that there were no weapons among any of his supporters.
Let him defend that in court under oath and with cross examination.
Yes, Justice Department, he DESERVES the day in court he earlier wanted!
When I put that on the next thread up, it got deleted. Strange.
When I put that on the next thred up, it got deleted. Strange.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
When I put that on the next thread up, it got deleted. Strange.
And it's real strange you don't realize posting identical posts in multiple threads is spamming
As is continuously posting comments from the same source
regardless of topic
apparently google got an upgrade and is catching the prolific spammer
and liar
and repeating liar
the POS "pastor"
(you)
Looks like we now know who the deleter is.
Looks like we now know who the deleter is.
Anonymous James's Fucking Daddy said...
are you this fucking stupid ?
Yes you are in spades fucked up....Only morons and trump dick suckers still believe he won.....still waiting for your post proving his victory!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!
Post a Comment