Democrats must be impressed that — according to them — Trump planned and implemented an insurrection and somehow managed to leave no evidence whatsoever.
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 18, 2022
Democrats must be impressed that — according to them — Trump planned and implemented an insurrection and somehow managed to leave no evidence whatsoever.
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 18, 2022
24 comments:
Pulitzer Board Says Russian Collusion Stories Stand Up
July 18, 2022 at 3:55 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 112 Comments
The Pulitzer Prize Board upheld the 2018 prize jointly awarded to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their reporting on the investigation into Russian collusion in the 2016 presidential campaign, finding no contradictory information that came out since the prize was awarded.
From the statement: “The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.”
Well Reverend...
Then you admit that Trump outsmarted the entire FBI, the entire CIA, the entire Democratic Party, and the special counsel with unlimited resources.
Either we have the most incompetent federal law enforcement in the history of the world... Trump is just way smarter than all of them combined.
Or the stories were wrong!
Well, CH aka Scott:
News July 17, 2022
A Statement from the Pulitzer Prize Board
The Pulitzer Prize Board has an established, formal process by which complaints against winning entries are carefully reviewed. In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries, including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign--submissions that jointly won the 2018 National Reporting prize.
These inquiries prompted the Pulitzer Board to commission two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition. Both reviews were conducted by individuals with no connection to the institutions whose work was under examination, nor any connection to each other. The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prize.
https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/staffs-new-york-times-and-washington-post
I just got censored again by CH.
Oh sorry...
I didn't notice that the media told you something.
Well then... it must be true!
Trump must be smarter than the entire Democratic Party, the FBI, the CIA, and that moron filled special counsel.
Because if you read something on the web...
It must be true!
I WAS CENSORED AGAIN BY CH.
HERE'S WHAT HE DIDN'T WANT YOU TO SEE:
July 17, 2022
A Statement from the Pulitzer Prize Board
The Pulitzer Prize Board has an established, formal process by which complaints against winning entries are carefully reviewed. In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries, including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign--submissions that jointly won the 2018 National Reporting prize.
These inquiries prompted the Pulitzer Board to commission two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition. Both reviews were conducted by individuals with no connection to the institutions whose work was under examination, nor any connection to each other. The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.
SORRY ABOUT THAT, CH. GOT ANYTHING FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL TO CONTRADICT THAT?
I THINK NOT.
SORRY ABOUT THAT, CH. GOT ANYTHING FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL TO CONTRADICT THAT?
No Reverend...
Logic and reality contradicts that.
Unlike you... I don't need the media to explain it to me.
I am a grown up and am paid in my job to provide clients with solutions to their problems. Never once have I provided them with a media story! I have actually need real solutions!
Another no answer answer from Ch (including incorrect grammar).
Nope.
Another stupid question that assumes I am a mindless follower who believes everything I read in the paper.
There is literally NO LOGIC to the idea that one "media story" needs to be reputed by "another media story"... where then two people sit around and argue over which "media story" is the most credible.
Rather, wouldn't it make more sense to look at reality?
Reality is that THERE WAS NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION!
So the "stories" suggesting that there was have been credibly debunked. You cannot just offer a story with no evidence of proof (if there was evidence of proof then one of the 5 different investigations would have found it) and expect that is remains "true".
And really Reverend...
are you expecting anyone to believe that there is not a single story in the media about how the Russian collusion story collapsed and how the FBI, CIA, and Special Counsel never found anything?
Is the seriously your argument?
Can you possibly be that stupid?
Just curious..
Oh and by the way...
I am expecting an answer to the last question.
Are you that stupid?
A simple yes or no will do!
No no answer answers like you like to say!
Oh and yes Reverend...
I am aware that there is a typo there. That doesn't make my questions any less relevant.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev.July 19, 2022 at 10:44 AM
It will likely be inundated by sea level rise in about 100 to 200 years, if nothing is done to slow it. I don’t think the Obama’s have to worry all that much.
For two reasons:
1) The Democrats will take over and lead the world into sensible climate warming control,
and
2) Even if that doesn't happen, they will not be alive in 100 to 200 years.
Lol@james
Making shit 🤪 up.
James, making excuses for The Biden's, Obimbo and Pelosi living the high life , yet, preaching to everyone else to live on less.
America under President Biden is in decline.
US Home Builders 👷♂️ 👷♀️ should be building at a peak pace.
Yet, new home starts have fallen again sharply.
It will likely be inundated by sea level rise in about 100 to 200 years, if nothing is done to slow it. I don’t think the Obama’s have to worry all that much.
There is not a climate alarmist anywhere that will suggest we have 200 years before things go haywire. According to inconvenient truth and such, these things should have already happened.
Should have, but didn't .
The Cultist of climate change project well into the future .
But, like with algore prediction, time defeated him.
So, according to James it is ok for Biden, Obama, Pelosi to live and pollute all they want.
More an more people are becoming more and more concerned about what is already happening climate wise in our world.
US
‘Pretty Shameful’: Biden Admin Has Sold Nearly 6 Million Barrels Of Strategic Oil Reserves To China
Fucking traitor
More an more people are becoming more and more concerned about what is already happening climate wise in our world.
Like the Obamas... who bought ocean side property that they know is in no danger of being engulfed by the sea...
even if they argue politically the opposite!
That goes with his ocean side home in Hawaii
Like the Obamas... who bought ocean side property that they know is in no danger of being engulfed by the sea...
________
No, like the Obamas who know that if the human race finally comes to its sense, as more and more are doing, we can be saved from sea incursion into Martha's vineyard.
Post a Comment