Even many of Biden’s critics agree that his establishment pedigree, and his promises to unify the country and work with Republicans, contributed to his victory over Trump. He reassured, they concede, many center-right voters who might have preferred the former president’s policies but recoiled from his belligerent personality and style. But to frustrated Democrats, the administration’s cautious response to the abortion decision is further evidence that Biden’s roots in an earlier political order have left him slow to acknowledge, much less respond to, the radicalization of the Trump-era GOP. The growing chorus among the president’s internal critics is that even if Biden was the right man for beating Trump, he has become the wrong man for combatting Trumpism.
If you set it to see either repeatedly posts or specific websites or even IT addresses. You usually target specific people like James. Then the websites management can delete them
Roger if this spam filter worked that way... every time you posted it would go to spam or it would never go to spam.
It's looking at specific words, specific links, time between comments, etc.
But the bottom line is the blog Administrator (me in this case) has no authority to update it, turn it off, or otherwise modify it. I am only allowed to check the filter and process what I do not feel is spam.
It is likely but most of them think it will be fixed soon after.
Most of "who" ???
Are you referring to the same people who said there was no inflation, inflation was good, inflation was transitory, and now suggest that a recession is not likely, and seem to not acknowledge that we already had a full quarter of negative GDP growth?
I just don't understand why it would filter out statements that I myself made in my own words. Those were not "spam," not C & P's, so what or who filtered them out (deleted them), and why?
what or who filtered them out (deleted them), and why?
Well Roger... it's the same question I have gone round and round with blogger about. They have no criteria that they can tell me, or any way to shut if off. They simply tell me to keep publishing the spam and that the spam filter will eventually "learn" which comments are spam and which ones are not.
But from I can gather:
1) certain links will trigger it 2) certain expressions will trigger it 3) too many comments from the same IP or user will trigger it
But this is because everyone "wants" everything filtered and censored these days. They believe that we have the ability to publish what we want that the more intrusive their filter is the better...
Because unlike conservatives... most of you liberals are into censorship and the more things are blocked the better. Then the blog host can pick and choose which comments to allow and which ones to block.
But in an "interactive" exchange that doesn't work. It only works on a blog that gets a handful of comments that are not time sensitive.
But it really doesn't matter, Roger.
I can explain this to you a million times..
and you will still fucking accuse me of deleting you like a fucking moron.
So I am done with it.
Your comments can sit there as far as I am concerned.
27 comments:
Notice that Roger and James don't understand technology, is it an OLD AGE THINGY?
I know more about technology and internet service than you can imagine.
Control c
P
D
A
I know more about technology and internet service than you can imagine.
Just not enough to understand what a spam filter is, huh?
Understanding how a spam filter works takes someone with a college degree to understand, huh?
Of course not.
The Atlantic. I agree 👍
Even many of Biden’s critics agree that his establishment pedigree, and his promises to unify the country and work with Republicans, contributed to his victory over Trump. He reassured, they concede, many center-right voters who might have preferred the former president’s policies but recoiled from his belligerent personality and style. But to frustrated Democrats, the administration’s cautious response to the abortion decision is further evidence that Biden’s roots in an earlier political order have left him slow to acknowledge, much less respond to, the radicalization of the Trump-era GOP. The growing chorus among the president’s internal critics is that even if Biden was the right man for beating Trump, he has become the wrong man for combatting Trumpism.
No! Of course not.
You have no idea about my abilities.
I got the job with Kaiser Permanente because I understand technology.
Engineers were shocked about it
I read and remember technology without a college degree
So Roger...
Then in your own words...
Explain how the spam filter works!!!
and then explain why you think it it me deleting your comments when you claim to "know" otherwise? Are you just being obnoxious?
If you set it to see either repeatedly posts or specific websites or even IT addresses. You usually target specific people like James. Then the websites management can delete them
You can setup to filter Gmail address
I posted something about it on her 2 minutes ago and it is gone because I used Gmail address
Sometimes people filter fuck etc
Blog spam filters work by blocking email addresses .
I have gotten past it by logging out of my rlamick51@gmail.com account
You know enough about modern technology to understand how he might be caught.
If there was communication or coordination between the far-right groups that helped storm the Capitol and Mr. Trump, it is impossible to hide it.
Nope...
Roger if this spam filter worked that way... every time you posted it would go to spam or it would never go to spam.
It's looking at specific words, specific links, time between comments, etc.
But the bottom line is the blog Administrator (me in this case) has no authority to update it, turn it off, or otherwise modify it. I am only allowed to check the filter and process what I do not feel is spam.
and to be clear Roger...
I have found multiple comments by you under different user logins that end up in spam. You might not notice if I publish them in a timely matter.
I wish it was that easy and I would tell everyone to change email addresses.
So if the filter blocks someone, you can allow it to appear or not.
You can filter it yourself.
If you think it's something you don't like, you don't unblock it.
You really have deleted me here 😔
You really could unblock but you have lost your mind Scott
Fuck you Roger...
I guess you don't want me to publish any of your fucking spam comments from now on. I will just leave them sit there...
I will publish everyone else's that goes in there...
Since you keep being an asshole and accusing me of blocking you.
I have had it with the constant attacks.
Roger, Please Answer.
C.H. TruthJuly 1, 2022 at 2:04 PM
It is likely but most of them think it will be fixed soon after.
Most of "who" ???
Are you referring to the same people who said there was no inflation, inflation was good, inflation was transitory, and now suggest that a recession is not likely, and seem to not acknowledge that we already had a full quarter of negative GDP growth?
These same people who are wrong all the time?
Roger makes a baseless statement and then when CHT stomps a mudhole in Roger, Roger runs.
I never said there's no spam filter.
I just don't understand why it would filter out statements that I myself made in my own words. Those were not "spam," not C & P's, so what or who filtered them out (deleted them), and why?
what or who filtered them out (deleted them), and why?
Well Roger... it's the same question I have gone round and round with blogger about. They have no criteria that they can tell me, or any way to shut if off. They simply tell me to keep publishing the spam and that the spam filter will eventually "learn" which comments are spam and which ones are not.
But from I can gather:
1) certain links will trigger it
2) certain expressions will trigger it
3) too many comments from the same IP or user will trigger it
But this is because everyone "wants" everything filtered and censored these days. They believe that we have the ability to publish what we want that the more intrusive their filter is the better...
Because unlike conservatives... most of you liberals are into censorship and the more things are blocked the better. Then the blog host can pick and choose which comments to allow and which ones to block.
But in an "interactive" exchange that doesn't work.
It only works on a blog that gets a handful of comments that are not time sensitive.
But it really doesn't matter, Roger.
I can explain this to you a million times..
and you will still fucking accuse me of deleting you like a fucking moron.
So I am done with it.
Your comments can sit there as far as I am concerned.
The right move by CHT.
Well, Ch, I said that, not Roger.
And you haven't been round and round about it with me.
And I have learned to get around it by posting as Honest, truthful pastor or Rev or something like that. It's just a bit annoying.
Post a Comment