Friday, August 26, 2022

After literally promising better behavior just yesterday...

29 out of the last 50 comments are from Roger and 10 of them are from the Reverend. Now that is not how the comment threads "look" because not all of those 39 comments are being published. But that means that nearly four out of every five comments were made by one or the other. 

This after both of them (just yesterday) suggested we could turn off moderation because they would refrain from spamming every thread. 

Some of the comments that did not make the cut: 
(Click on them to increase the size.)


Roger literally cutting and pasting the post he was commenting on? Seriously did someone need to reread the post in the comment section? 


Oh and these gems - the "decent" Reverend losing his cool over a link because his entire intention was to criticize the source rather than engage in any debate whatsoever. Are we really here to argue about links? I mean why debate the actual subjects at hand when you can be an internet troll. 


and some more cut and pastes from Roger (complaining again about being blocked) or just linking the same exact article (lawandcrime) that he put in about 5 different comments over multiple threads since the article hit. Apparently Mr "I won't cut and paste. I will provide my own opinion."forgot already?



Let's be clear. I will criticize someone for "believing" Paul Krugman, only because he is proven wrong almost daily. I will criticize someone for falling for the anonymous source stories from Maggie Haberman who has a batting average that would make your late inning utility infielder blush. I will even point out that linking politicalwire.com all day long is not productive for anyone. But if there is something I disagree with, I will provide an explanation above and beyond criticizing the source, unless that source is anonymous, then I will laugh at you for still believing them. 

There used to be "real debate". Now it is literally dominated by trolls trolling all day long calling each other names. Yeah, the name calling is on both sides, but the bulk of it comes from a handful.  The question isn't whether or not to turn off moderation, but whether or not to turn off comments again all together.

14 comments:

rrb said...



In other news, the alky's Lord & Savior - Saint Joey Sprinkles of the Ice Cream Cone managed to shave over 1000 points from the Dow today.





Anonymous said...

KD.
It is thier lack of self control that causes them to post so much .

99% of what they post is not thier own thoughts/words.

Ty, Scott for controlling those two intellectual children.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The brief also said the government has probable cause to believe "that a statute prohibiting obstruction of justice has been violated," and that there is a heightened risk of violence against FBI agents and other law enforcement personnel in the wake of the Mar-a-Lago search.

Lmao

C.H. Truth said...

Well laugh away Roger...

You got 10 days before you said Trump would be in prison and you would leave the blog!

Kerry in a landslide!


Are you going to leave the blog or not?

Myballsinthewoodsagain said...

The IRS tax returns for Nikki Haleys nonprofit PAC Stand for America were just leaked to and published by politico.

This, after what we've seen the fbi and doj doing. This administration has become the most corrupt in history.

And thank you for not subjecting us to all the spamming bullshit by the two old men here.

Anonymous said...

KD.

James and Roger have dropped the Biden "winning in Ukraine " and " Dow Soars" under President. Joe Failure.
Down 600 yesterday.
Today ,Joe Failure did better.
"32,283.40 −1,008.38 (-3.03%)today

anonymous said...

ONCE AGAIN THE BALL LESS WONDER POSTS MISLEADING STORY... THE SAD THING IS THAT THE REAL STORY WILL BE FORGOTTEN!!!!!

However, the organization Documented, which describes itself as a nonpartisan government watchdog that investigates money in politics, obtained an unredacted copy of Stand For America’s 2019 filings, which it then shared with POLITICO. The group did not share the original source of the filing, but it bears a stamp from the charity office of the New York state attorney general.


Sure leads me to believe there was no leak, just normal GOP paranoia!!!!!

Anonymous said...

The corporate leftist media does its part by glorifying a now dynamic “Aviator Joe.” 


Biden in cool sunglasses is now constructed into a swaggering “Top Gun” Tom Cruise-like figure, rather than a cognitively challenged 79-year-old. 

Anonymous said...

KD,
Myballsinthewoodsagain.

Haley is getting to powerful.

So The DoJ and FBI at the Direction of Biden leak her Tax Info.

What a Banana Republic Joe has turned the US unto.

Anonymous said...

Biden was in on it

https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/08/mar-a-lago-raid-trump-seeks-special-master-as-leaked-docs-show-biden-helping-fbi-just-prior-to-raid-by-retroactively-waiving-trumps-executive-privilege/



Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Ch, my last posts have been quite short. It is becomming all the more obvious that what you object to is the fact that I get your goat by frequently pointing out how wrong you are.

But it is you who are turning this into your own little opinion dictatorship.

C.H. Truth said...

Reverend...

There has not been a single post that you provided and I deleted that was you discussing the issue at hand. But you did manage to add four different comments complaining about a "link" to a story, and calling me names.


here it is in a "nutshell"

YOU (as in the Reverend James Boswell) can not logically "win" any arguments if you are just cutting and pasting someone else's opinion. You then are making a "proxy" argument between me and a third Party who is not actually available to ask follow up questions or provide them with reasons why they are wrong.

And generally if I provide "you" or Roger or Denny with those same follow up questions or reasons why they are wrong... I get no response or worse yet, I will get a lecture about how much more credible they are (as if being a media personality makes you smarter).


Even when I post something from someone else I referring to something very specific and if it is a law or order or legal opinion I will verify what they say is actually true (because these things believe it or not are misrepresented all the time).

When the redacted affidavit came out.

I read it before I went looking to see what others were saying?

Did you read it yourself or go to politicalwire.com to wait for someone else to read it for you?

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Ch, things are not going well for Trump these days, in case you have not noticed.

That is going to continue. But in response to what you say, I am amazed at how many times it seems to me that I HAVE answered you, and answered you well, when you CLAIM I have not.

But let the readers decide that, not you.

And now I will point out that my 8:32 post in the thread above went unanswered by you. And that was over two hours ago.

C.H. Truth said...

Need I remind you Reverend that there is another blog where you and Roger are free to post what you want and comment however you want...

In fact send my you email address to my coldheartedtruth@yahoo.com address and I can even make you an "author" if you would like. You and Roger can take turns posting what it is you want.

I will even add a link to the sidebar!

You can put whatever you want over there and anyone and everyone is free to go over there and engage the comment threads (or not).