Monday, September 5, 2022

BREAKING: Judge Grants Trump Request for Special Master After Mar-a-Lago Raid

Tells FBI to halt all review of Documents that they seized from their 30 armed agent raid
Update: Will the DOJ ignore the Judge's ruling?
“The United States is examining the opinion and will consider appropriate next steps in the ongoing litigation.” Justice Department Spokesman Anthony Coley.

If this is (as some people believe) more of an issue of political and public concern than a legal one, the more the DOJ pushes back on this ruling, the more guilty they will be seen of a variety of different allegations that are going to be thrown at them. 

Unless the DOJ seriously has something to hide here, I see no point in them defying or otherwise appealing this ruling. As many people like to suggest, if you are not guilty of anything, then you have nothing to fear from some transparency and oversight. 

More to the point, the Trump team will play this out as further justification that the raid was unfair and that the DOJ should have honored their original request (shortly after the raid) to have special master assigned. While some (like McCarthy) argue that the civil action took too long, the irony is the the fact that the warrant refers to "letters" and "requests" ignored by the Trump team justified the search, while also not providing a legal subpoena themselves for months before the raid. 

Either "requests" are something that should be taken seriously or not. You cannot argue that a request is not enough to warrant a special master, when your pretense for the relative search was based on different "requests" being ignored. Why should some "requests" be ignored without consequences, while requests warrant a 30 armed agent late night gestapo style raid? 


9 comments:

Anonymous said...

KD.

How is it Roger is being Allowed to post here?
Isn't his time UP?

Anonymous said...

Oh ,looking the Ass 🤡 at CNN
Are attempting to act like Journalists, 2 Plus Years Late.

"CNN reporter tweets there are ‘serious questions’ about Hunter Biden, FBI: ‘Shouldn’t be a partisan issue'Sidner says 'legitimate questions should be asked and answered' about FBI investigation into President Biden's son".

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Better go to the Legacy blog for better info on this.

Anonymous said...

KD.
James and Roger are confused.
When Twitter stooped President Trump from posting they applauded.
When they are stopped from posting her they are suddenly appalled.

Caliphate4vr said...

Pedo anyone of us capable of going to WSJ, Politico, CNBC and reading the shit y’all spam in our own

So piss off and stay on the hospice blog

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Wsj


The Supreme Court, she wrote, has left open the question of whether a former president can raise executive privilege claims against a successor administration.

Still, she cautioned that the special master review ultimately might prove of little benefit to Mr. Trump.

He “ultimately may not be entitled to return of much of the seized property or to prevail on his anticipated claims of privilege,” she wrote. “For now, the circumstances surrounding the seizure in this case and the associated need for adequate procedural safeguards are sufficiently compelling to at least get Plaintiff past the courthouse doors.”


Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

If the least Trump attains is to get past the courthouse doors, he's in deep, deep doo doo.

Caliphate4vr said...

Yes those 1693 newspaper and magazine clippings they confiscated along Melania panties are truly horrific crimes by Bad Orange Man. His 4th amendment was violated this all gets tossed

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.39.1_1.pdf

Anonymous said...

KD.

When we come to this Blog tomorrow Roger will be gone.

Bye dumbass.