Another example of TDS
Operation Jump Start
…the President called for up to 6,000 National Guard members to assist with surveillance, installing fences and vehicle barriers, as well as provide training. This support mission, Operation Jump Start, will provide significant assistance to securing the southern U.S. border during the next two years.
CBP Border Patrol and the National Guard coordinated with the state governors and adjutants general to deploy National Guard troops in support of Border Patrol operations. This unprecedented cooperative effort has resulted in the deployment of 6,000 National Guard personnel to California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. Deployment numbers are based on operational need and threat.
This two-year deployment supplements and supports current efforts while CBP hires and trains 6,000 additional Border Patrol agents and implements the Secure Border Initiative and SBInet.
National Guard units assist CBP by executing logistical and administrative support, operating detection systems, providing mobile communications, augmenting border-related intelligence analysis efforts, and building and installing border security infrastructure.
Operation Jump Start relieves Border Patrol agents from non-law enforcement duties, allowing them to focus on border security. To date more than 350 Border Patrol agents have been able to return to traditional frontline duties due to the presence of the Guard.
Operation Phalanx
The Army National Guard (ARNG) established Operation Phalanx in July 2010, based on an Executive Order from President Obama authorizing up to 1,200 Soldiers and Airmen along the 1,933-mile southwest border in support of the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency. Operation Phalanx is the successor operation to Operation Jump Start, which was declared by former President Bush authorizing up to 6,000 National Guard Soldiers and Airmen from 2006 through 2008. Operation Phalanx, scheduled to end in June 2011, provides support primarily from the Southwest Border States of California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.
The National Guard Soldiers and Airmen assigned to Operation Phalanx have been serving as a force multiplier for the U.S. Border Patrol by spotting border intrusions and providing technical support. The National Guard has performed tasks such as ground surveillance, criminal investigative analysis, command and control, mobile communications, transportation, logistics, and training support.
31 comments:
Once again, CH depends on they did it first for his bias....crossings at a 47 year low and we need to deploy troops to keep you and rat hole happy....sad it has come to this....
Politic
Mexico Border Wall: Oregon Governor Tells Trump She'll Refuse Order To Send Guard Troops South
Newsweek Shane Croucher,Newsweek 3 hours ago
Governor Kate Brown said she will refuse any order from President Donald Trump to send Oregon's guard troops down south to the US-Mexico border.
Trump wants National Guard troops sent to the Mexican border as his effort to build an impenetrable wall stalls because his administration is struggling to secure enough funds from Congress or other sources. He originally said Mexico would pay for the wall, but it has refused.
In a presidential memorandum authorizing the request of deployment of Guards to the border, Trump says U.S. security is "imperiled by a drastic surge of illegal activity", in particular drug trafficking by gangs and unlawful immigration.
He said it is a "crisis" of "lawlessness" at the southern border.
"If @realDonaldTrump asks me to deploy Oregon Guard troops to the Mexico border, I’ll say no," tweeted Democratic Gov Brown. "As Commander of Oregon’s Guard, I’m deeply troubled by Trump’s plan to militarize our border."
She added: "There’s been no outreach by the President or federal officials, and I have no intention of allowing Oregon’s guard troops to be used to distract from his troubles in Washington."
"But apparently it's a constitutional crisis when Trump does it?
Another example of TDS"
It's either TDS, or they're worried their drug supplies will be in jeopardy.
"But apparently it's a constitutional crisis when Trump does it?
Another example of TDS"
The only one making that claim is CH and our lezbo.....Hyperbole is running rampant in everything CH posts. You want BS... just listen to donnie and his lies about the postal service and amazon....pure crap, just like the way lezbo likes......
You forgot LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL, Denny sweetie.
Lezbo Loretta continues her idiotic ways with
You forgot LOL LOL
Trump authorizes his Secretary of Defense to use National Guard as part of their "Required Drills and field exercises". Citing 32 U.S. Code § 502 - look it up.
A training exercise.
A training exercise.
hopefully it's live fire.
Yep
A tremendous waste of military time and skill. Just like it was when Bush and Obama sent our warriors to babysit the border.
Pnc, what would you do?
I'd get the federal government out of the social engineering business and quit spending money trying to control the makeup of our population. Deregulate immigration.
So PNC, you're for an open border?
I'm for limited government. The Republican Party was for it too, once.
"Border security" is nothing but a Trojan Horse that brought massive government-save-me leftism into the Republican Party.
So your for limited government when it comes to protecting our country against invasion.
But you have no problem with big government as long a we're invading other countries.
Or it's just because Trump?
Yeah, that's consistent.
"I want all of us to move forward to end the environment that allowed people like Nikolas Cruz to fall through the cracks. You knew he was a problem years ago and you did nothing. He should have never been in school with us.'"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5588325/Parkland-student-shot-FIVE-times-blames-sheriff-school-superintendent.html
Invading another country when it's necessary for the defense of this country is not contradictory to the principle of limited government. Because you can bet that the enemy is not fighting for our liberties.
Social engineering dressed up as "protecting our country against invasion" is just a bullshit applause line that only works on idiots. There is no "invasion".
I would be cheering a US President who actually adhered to "necessary for the defense of this country" for sending troops into combat.
On that subject, it just struck me that as sad as Obama's backing off his "Red Line" in Syria was, at least he had a red line. Trump doesn't appear to be concerned about Syrian chemical weapon attacks. Perhaps because the Russians are backing them? In fact, he's toed Russia's line in Syria ever since his symbolic bombing of nothing ... Hmmm, one wonders what the connection might be ...
Syrian chemical weapon attacks. Perhaps because the Russians are backing them?
Judging from Trump's twitter feed this morning, he's contemplating another airstrike and he's not going to warn the Russian's this time.
Social engineering dressed up as "protecting our country against invasion" is just a bullshit applause line that only works on idiots.
Isn't allowing illegal immigrants to overrun the country also a form of social engineering?
Allowing people freedom of movement and the freedom to relocate as they see fit is called "liberty". At one time the Republican Party valued it. Using the power of the federal government to try to control the movement of residents in and out of this country in order to maintain quotas and demographic targets is social engineering.
Furthermore, nobody is "overrunning the country". That's another bullshit applause line invented for knuckle-draggers.
There are 11 million illegal immigrants and 323 million of us. That's 29 American citizens for every illegal immigrant. Even if the entire combined populations of Mexico and every Central American country illegally relocated here en masse, we would still outnumber them 2 to 1.
Nobody is getting "overrun" any time soon.
"In fact, he's toed Russia's line in Syria ever since his symbolic bombing of nothing"
It's even worse than that. He's virtually handed Syria, Lebanon, and probably also Iraq and Libya, over to Russia. Under Trump's mismanagement, America has lost the war against ISIS.
"Isn't allowing illegal immigrants to overrun the country also a form of social engineering?"
That's the goal.
Soros globalists, both of them.
Allowing people freedom of movement and the freedom to relocate as they see fit is called "liberty".
That's a fine sentiment as long as every country in the world were like Canada where there was some economic and cultural equivalency.
But that is not the case. You have people from desperately poor countries getting in with no skills and no cultural affinity for the country.
As best they displace some native born workers at worst that put strain on the social welfare system, turn to crime, or are victims of slavery.
*At best
Nobody is getting "overrun" any time soon.
Really? We now have voting ballots that are both on English and Spanish.
There is a huge market for Spanish language entertainment and programming.
I pretty much say we are getting overrun right now.
Menstral our cramp alleges printing ballots in Spanish means we are being over run...
The language assistance, required by the federal Voting Rights Act since 1975, applies to places with Asian American, Latino, American Indian and Alaska Native populations that meet certain requirements. The Justice Department, which enforces the law, says the assistance helps more people “be informed voters and participate effectively in our representative democracy.” During the last reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act, in 2006, Congress extended the language assistance provisions to 2032, and they were not affected by a Supreme Court ruling in 2013 that invalidated other sections of the law.
Once again our cramp ignores that the voting rights act sets requirements for the printing of ballots in areas with high degrees of non-english speaking citizens. Once again proving the right does not like anything but old white people voting....
I would say that it's more reflective of tribalism in modern Republican politics than anything racial or bigoted. Being "overrun" and "ballots in Spanish" is outrageous to them because it implies the potential of "them" eventually having more votes than "us". Their intense focus on tribalism, rather than the needs of society as a whole, means that their interests (as they see it) will eventually lose out.
Ironically, the political philosophy that is more inclusive, that they struggle against, will be protecting their interests if that time comes.
Anonymous commie said... "... ignores that the voting rights act sets requirements for the printing of ballots in areas with high degrees of non-english speaking citizens. Once again proving the right does not like anything but old white people voting...."
tribalism in modern Republican politics than anything racial or bigoted. Being "overrun" and "ballots in Spanish" is
You are being extremely kind, WP....My cut is that there is a root cause and racial motivation is at the bottom of their desire to keep people from voting...Just my opinion.....
Some new data concerning old, white R voters....they finally pulling their heads out of their asses, maybe. Time will certainly tell!!! Good, maybe there is hope yet for the country !!!!
April 9 (Reuters) - Older, white, educated voters helped Donald Trump win the White House in 2016. Now, they are trending toward Democrats in such numbers that their ballots could tip the scales in tight congressional races from New Jersey to California, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll and a data analysis of competitive districts shows.
Nationwide, whites over the age of 60 with college degrees now favor Democrats over Republicans for Congress by a 2-point margin, according to Reuters/Ipsos opinion polling during the first three months of the year. During the same period in 2016, that same group favored Republicans for Congress by 10 percentage points. (Graphic: https://tmsnrt.rs/2H39Tur)
The 12-point swing is one of the largest shifts in support toward Democrats that the Reuters/Ipsos poll has measured over the past two years. If that trend continues, Republicans will struggle to keep control of the House of Representatives, and possibly the Senate, in the November elections, potentially dooming President Donald Trump's legislative agenda.
“The real core for the Republicans is white, older white, and if they’re losing ground there, they’re going to have a tsunami,” said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist who closely tracks political races. “If that continues to November, they’re toast.”
Yes, accusing anybody who oppose unlimited immigration as racist ot tribelist is just a tired old canard.
You are a fool.
Post a Comment