Basically, Feinstein and gang are refusing to turn over a non-redacted version of the letter she received from Professor Ford. Feinstein has apparently shared the letter with some of her colleagues, just not any Republicans. So the question becomes, what exactly is Feinstein hiding, and how is it that we should provide Ford with both her absolute privacy "and" take her claim at face value?
In no place in our judicial system (criminal, civil, or otherwise) do we allow people to make allegations, without allowing the accused to confront their accuser. While this may seem unfair to some people in some cases, the alternative (to allow people to make accusations anonymously and without facing any questions) would be nothing short of a totalitarian kangaroo court where any allegation serves as a finding of guilt.
6 comments:
DiFi and her Ilk are for their version of truth.
This is fun and funny to watch.
It was never to have gotten this far. The left bluff was called Bigly.
Grassley always shows an Iowan calmness. But I can tell that he's had enough.
dr. cray cray is what you get when you drag a $100 bill through a wealthy bethesda neighborhood.
h/t - james carville.
"In my [Facebook] post, I was empowered and I was sure it probably did [happen]," Miranda told NPR. "I had no idea that I would now have to go to the specifics and defend it before 50 cable channels and have my face spread all over MSNBC news and Twitter."
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/20/649787076/kavanaugh-accuser-classmate-that-it-happened-or-not-i-have-no-idea?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20180920
translation -
"i just wanted to be an attention whore and grab my 15 minutes of twitter fame. i didn't know that the truth would actually fucking matter."
Ford's classmate has now retracted her statement. Mostly because it contradicted everything ford said.
Yeah that wasn't a good look.
Post a Comment