Nuke the filibuster over the shut down?

“If a majority is good enough in the House and a majority would have kept government from shutting down, I think that’s a whole case the American public would say, ‘That’s a responsible way to govern,’” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Roll Call.

Asked if he thinks Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would consider ending the legislative filibuster — coming on the heels of recent rules changes to lower the threshold to advance executive and judicial nominees by a majority only — McCarthy said, “That’s a question for Mitch.”

Personally I sort of agree with the concept that we need a good Government shut down, so I would be against said change in rules specifically over this. However, I do wonder why a short term funding bill could not be passed via some sort of reconciliation? After all, it is really just a budgetary thing, something that generally qualifies for reconciliation. If you can claim Obamacare falls under reconciliation, then you can claim a short term funding bill does as well. I believe you can do so with a great deal of credibility.

The question would be, would the Democrats who bucked their leadership still do so if their vote actually meant something tangible, rather than just something symbolic?