(full text of memo)
- The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the initial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.
- Andrew McCabe confirmed (during sworn testimony to the committee) that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.
- The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.
- the FBI, DOJ, and Fusion GPS, and Richard Steele himself all leaked information to media outlets like Yahoo News, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, etc, etc. Then those media reports (specifically Yahoo News) were included as additional evidence for the FISA application. The applications suggested that the source was not anyone associated with Steele or the dossier.
- DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and passionate about preventing it. This information was also withheld from the FISA courts.
- Ohr's wife also worked with Fusion GPS, actually working on the same opposition research. All of her research was presented to the FBI through Ohr.
- The FICA application suggests coordination between Carter Page and George Papadopoulos. However, the FBI had no actual evidence of such coordination. Subsequently, the Papadopoulos information is said to have triggered the FBI counter-intelligence investigation into possible Trump campaign Russian collusion.
- The texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page include discussions about orchestrating leaks to the media regarding the investigation.
Let's first reiterate that the FBI has not suggested any of this memo is inherently false. They went through it, there were some minor alterations, but by all accounts the contents are true as they stand. The argument from the FBI (and the Democrats) is that the memo is misleading based on certain omissions. (otherwise known as - they didn't get to tell their side of the story)
_____
So far, this is nothing that wasn't already speculated about. But it does confirm that the FISA application was provided to a Judge under false pretenses in a variety of ways. Without another reasonable explanation for why the FBI would otherwise do so, it would certainly appear to show clear political bias for the action. It also shows evidence that high ranking members of the FBI investigation team were orchestrating damaging leaks to the media.
There is also speculation brewing that recent postponement of General Flynn's sentencing has to do with whether or not information obtained from Flynn's phone calls had to do with similar warrants (or illegal unmasking). If Mueller used Flynn's recorded conversations to prove his misleading statement charges, the entire plea agreement could be in jeopardy if the reasons to record those conversations are not legitimate.
To be clear, there is nothing in the memo that states this, but the speculation is there in part due to people associated with the separate ongoing Inspector General investigation into this matter. Many expect that report to be the equivalent to a rather large "other shoe" dropping.
236 comments:
1 – 200 of 236 Newer› Newest»this is only the beginning.
Senior DOJ and FBI official knew the political origin of the dossier but omitted it from the FISA application.
This stuff makes watergate look like a kiddie party. This is serious and it is criminal.
WASHINGTON—In the summer of 2016, FBI Agent Peter Strzok had just wrapped up the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and was embarking on a probe into Moscow’s interference in the presidential election. As he watched the Republican National Convention and scanned intelligence reports and news stories, he made clear how he felt about his new target: “f*ck the cheating motherf*cking Russians,” he texted in late July. “Bastards. I hate them.”
“I think they’re probably the worst,” texted Mr. Strzok, who had spent years tracking Russian spies and was familiar with their tactics. “F*cking conniving cheating savages. At statecraft, athletics, you name it. I’m glad I’m on Team USA.”
The messages were sent to FBI lawyer Lisa Page, one of thousands turned over by the Justice Department to Congress on Jan. 19 as part of an internal inquiry into how the Federal Bureau of Investigation handled its investigation into Mrs. Clinton. Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page, who were in an extramarital affair at the time, have been accused of bias against President Donald Trump after some previously released emails showed their disdain for the president.
In the texts, provided to Congress and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the pair’s distaste for Mr. Trump re-emerges. After the 2016 election, Mr. Strzok wrote, “OMG I am so depressed.” Ms. Page replied, “I don’t know if I can eat. I am very nauseous.”
Republicans have said the FBI’s handling of the Clinton probe and the Russia investigation, as well as the criticism of Mr. Trump in the couple’s exchanges, indicate bias against the president and have suggested a conspiracy to undermine him.
Mr. Trump said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal last month that he interpreted Mr. Strzok’s messages to Ms. Page as “treason.” Mr. Strzok’s attorney said at the time the president’s accusation was “beyond reckless.”
Texts critical of Mr. Trump represent a fraction of the roughly 7,000 messages, which stretch across 384 pages and show no evidence of a conspiracy against Mr. Trump. Rather, a broader look shows an unvarnished and complex picture of the lives of an FBI agent and lawyer who found themselves at the center of highly charged probes.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the-fbi-life-of-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page-as-told-in-their-text-messages-1517589380
cute piece on a pair of FBI traitors, alky.
we're past that now.
Rojer....lesson learned....texts and e-mails are forever and can be cherry picked to reveal anything someone wants it to be...My own experience goes to an e-mail I received and never forwarded that contained the phrase "kill a commie for Christ" and a holy roller who had a complaint about the sender was emboldened from such words.... Bottom line...I got a letter into my file as an accessory to the BS........
Blogger Commonsense said...
Senior DOJ and FBI official knew the political origin of the dossier but omitted it from the FISA application.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
the famous but incompetent assholes were so fucking stupid, they used the dossier without vetting it, leaked pieces of the dossier to the media, and then used media reports generated by THEIR leaks as additional evidence in their FISA application.
the FBI needs to be disbanded. TODAY. people this stupid and traitorous have no business having this much power.
ute piece on a pair of FBI traitors
Traitors???? Yeah sure ass wipe....The have more integrity in their little finger than you have in your worthless life....They all take an oath, all you have is BS.....idiot..
Ever deal with the Israeli's??? " oPie
Answer : Nope
Have you in the manner and context you framed your debating point?
So far, this is nothing but what already speculated about. But it does confirm that the FISA application was provided to a Judge under false pretenses in my non-lawyer opinion. Without another reasonable explanation than what I can imagine is for why the FBI would otherwise do so, it would certainly appear to show clear political bias for the action in my uninformed opinion.
There is also my opinion,the politically motivated speculation brewing that recent postponement of General Flynn's sentencing has to do with whether or not information obtained from Flynn's phone calls had to do with similar warrants that in my uninformed opinion If Mueller used Flynn's recorded conversations to prove his misleading statement charges, the entire plea agreement could be in jeopardy, that I believe, even though I don't have any fucking proof,in my opinion.
Roger Amick completes his post with corrections.
This stuff makes watergate look like a kiddie party. This is serious and it is criminal." American Voter
Yep.
hey alky,
the memo dispenses with all of your papadopoulos "theories." by a fucking LANDSLIDE.
LOL.
Senior DOJ and FBI official knew the political origin of the dossier but omitted it from the FISA application."
CS
Obama knew, remember we where told how smart and in total control.
cute piece from the Wall Street Journal, on a pair of FBI patriots.
If Mueller used Flynn's recorded conversations to prove his misleading statement charges, the entire plea agreement could be in jeopardy, that I believe, even though I don't have any fucking proof,in my opinion.
Fruit of the poison tree. The plea deal is moot, the charges will be dismissed.
And Flynn would be able to recover his legal fees.
cnn has comes out of the gate LYING about the FISA warrants:
"Even if the dossier was used as part of the application, a FISA renewal indicates that a judge was convinced that the surveillance was yielding information about the target acting as an agent of a foreign power that merited continued monitoring."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/02/politics/republican-intelligence-memo/index.html
no... rosenstein, mccabe and sally yates just kept signing the renewals. there is no indication that a judge was convinced of anything.
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile.
I'm laughing out loud at you two.
They haven't been able to contradict the information.
He is correctly afraid of the existential threat to his Presidency.
If Mueller used Flynn's recorded conversations to prove his misleading statement charges
alky, this is emblematic of exactly how weak mueller's case really is. he had to catch flynn in a process crime perjury trap and nail him for not remembering exactly what he said in a phone conversation. it doesn't get any weaker than that.
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile.
One of you losers used my name again.
So Obama-Hillary-Lynch-Schumer-Polosi-Comey and others knew.
With out Trump Win, we would never had known.
A Hillary win continues the cover up.
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile.
They haven't been able to contradict the information.
dumb fuck,
the issue is not whether the info can be contradicted.
the issue is that the basis for the FISA warrant was a fucking fraud.
as cs has said, fruit of the poison tree. mueller has been perpetuating a lie for over a year. another "sterling" reputation turns to shit.
A Hillary win continues the cover up.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
that always was the final piece to the puzzle. she wins and this never sees the light of day.
think about that.
that should scare the living shit out of every patriotic american.
liberals, not so much.
Huffington post
"TRUMP IGNORES JUSTICE--RELEASED MEMO"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/02/us/politics/trump-fbi-memo.html
Another huge point: The FISA Application cited a Michael Isikoff article as "corroborating information" for the Steele Memo, despite the fact that it was Steele who had leaked that information to Isikoff.
So, Steele "corroborated himself" by leaking to Isikoff and then saying "Look, Isikoff says so too."
More: Steele was fired by the FBI for breaking rules of confidentiality when he went on his Media Tour, trying to interest Mother Jones and other outlets in his claims. The Memo notes he should have been fired for speaking to Yahoo News/Isikoff much earlier, before the first FISA application, because he gave Isikioff his bullshit too.
So yes, the FISA application was fatally defective from the outset. And yet Rod Rosenstein, Andrew McCabe, and Sally Yates (!!!) just kept re-signing the renewal applications.
The FBI and DOJ do not seem to have alerted the court to Steele's firing or unreliability (or partisan bias) in any application, even after they themselves fired him.
When Comey "briefed" Trump about the memo, he also withheld from Trump the dossier's partisan origins as well as the unreliablity (and firability) of its alleged author.
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/373674.php
I'm not going to waste any more time with you closed minded idiots
that always was the final piece to the puzzle. she wins and this never sees the light of day.
think about that.
that should scare the living shit out of every patriotic american.
Yes, especially considering we have a media that little more than the propaganda arm of the Democrat National Committee.
LOL. cnn is absolutely losing their shit -
Trump, by accusing the leadership of having a bias against Republicans, is once again maligning people he appointed to their roles, including FBI Director Christopher Wray, a man Trump nominated after he fired former FBI Director James Comey in May.
[...]
The President's tweet also ignores the fact that many senior people involved in the investigation, including Wray, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and Comey, are all longtime Republicans.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/02/politics/trump-tweet-nunes-memo/index.html
Blogger Roger Amick said...
I'm not going to waste any more time with you closed minded idiots
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
well, at least your formally declared defeat today instead of just slithering away quietly as usual.
The Democrats that knew it :
President Obama
VP Biden
The AG
The Director of the FBI
The Director of the DOJ
And OTHERS that have/had the power of Governing in thier filthy rotten hands.
You voted for them, the unbridled corruption of two of the Three Branches of The Federal Government.
you're
THE WHITE FLAG OF LOSER HB.
"I'm not going to waste any more time with you closed minded idiots".
Aw don't cry pot belly crippled alky.
hey alky, get a load of this:
https://patriotpost.us/cartoons/25769#share
THE WHITE FLAG OF LOSER HB.
"I'm not going to waste any more time with you closed minded idiots".
Aw don't cry pot belly crippled alky.
the only error i could find in the whole memo was in the cover letter. adam schiff is referred to as "honorable."
The Democrats that knew it :
President Obama
VP Biden
The AG
The Director of the FBI
The Director of the DOJ
And OTHERS that have/had the power of Governing in thier filthy rotten hands.
You voted for them, the unbridled corruption of two of the Three Branches of The Federal Government.
Huffington post
"TRUMP IGNORES JUSTICE--RELEASED MEMO"
So Obama-Hillary-Lynch-Schumer-Polosi-Comey and others knew.
With out Trump Win, we would never had known.
A Hillary win continues the cover up.
Confirmed:
The two-bit community organizer and never-Trumpers are corrupt to their core.
It doesn't refute anything
I just read it
The Democrats said they hoped to release their own memo responding to the allegations on Feb. 5.
The entire file that the Justice Department used to apply to a special court for permission to eavesdrop on Page remains highly classified, making it hard to evaluate the memo’s contents.
FBI ANGER OVER MEMO
Two days ago, in a rare public rebuke of the president and Republicans in Congress who were pushing to release the memo, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said it had "grave concerns about material omissions of fact" in the document and it should not be made public.
On Friday, FBI agents defended their work and said they "have not, and will not, allow partisan politics to distract" from their mission.
"The American people should know that they continue to be well-served by the world’s preeminent law enforcement agency," FBI Agents Association President Thomas O’Connor said in a statement after the memo's release.
"The American people should know that they continue to be well-served by the world’s most corrupt gang who couldn't shoot straight," FBI Agents Association President Thomas O’Connor said in a statement after the memo's release.
fixed it for ya there tommy boy.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
It doesn't refute anything
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
what exactly was it supposed to refute?
The Democrats said they hoped to release their own memo responding to the allegations on Feb. 5.
Look forward to it. Although I suspect it will be long on wind and short on significant findings.
It will be mostly quiveling over the facts and text of the GOP memo.
FBI ANGER OVER MEMO
No sources and methods were compromise but the use of political opposition research for FISA warrants is embarrassing to the leadership.
It should be.
Ch "Truth" previously said:
"Asking employees to be loyal to whom they work for... is obstruction of justice, huh? Not only that, it's OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE in capital letters!!
Coo-coo Coo-coo"
_____________
I, James, answered:
Well, coo coo Ch. When a President under investigation in his capacity as President of the United States, sworn to uphold the Constitutin and the laws, tries to get the investigation shut down, called off, terminated -- yep, that constitutes OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE in most people's legal understanding.
February 2, 2018 at 1:03 PM
Blogger rrb said...
"except trump has done none of those things, pederast.
not one."
____________________
I James now say:
Racist Rat (who calls himself Republican Rat Bastard (rrb) really is a racist, while I am neither a pederast nor a pedophile (as he well knows, or he would report me to church and government authorities for legal action).
I do not report him as a racist because that is not against the law, unless criminally acted upon.
Racist Rat says that Trump has not "shut down, called off, [or] terminated" the investigation.
True. He only TRIED. As President of the United States he is sworn to uphold the Constitution and the laws, yet he directly and officially asked people in authority to do just that -- shut down, call off, terminate the investigation.
And that legally constitutes an OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
No sources and methods were compromise but the use of political opposition research for FISA warrants is embarrassing to the leadership.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
embarrassing at a minimum. what i find most disturbing is how fucking stupid and lazy these "elite" law enforcement officials are. it's one thing to be as biased as they obviously are, but to use an unvetted, clinton paid for propaganda instrument all while needing hillary to win to get away with all this shit is truly absurd.
shut down the FBI today, and strip each employee of their badge, service weapon and credentials.
you simply cannot give this much power to people this stupid and expect it not to turn to shit.
Racist Rat says that Trump has not "shut down, called off, [or] terminated" the investigation.
True. He only TRIED.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
he only tried, eh?
show us the evidence of that pederast.
"yet he directly and officially asked people in authority to do just that -- shut down, call off, terminate the investigation."
uh no, actually he did not. if he had, mueller would've had trump indicted by now. especially since mueller has nothing at all on trump after jerking off for over a year.
nice try though.
"show us the evidence of that pederast."
LOL, the pedo has nothing.
Mueller is gathering evidence that he did just that. And later fired FBI Director Comey because he did not do what he asked. And later he even bragged about doing that to Russian officials in order to shut down the investigation (he thought!).
Quite a bit of evidence. When Mueller moves, it will be, I suspect, with even more.
But nice try, racist rodent.
Problem for you James...
Asking an employee for loyalty...
is not the same as asking someone to end an investigation...
1+1 does not equal 22
Problem for you, Ch.
Asking an employee for loyalty is not the same thing as asking an employee to shut down an investigation.
later fired FBI Director Comey because he did not do what he asked.
That's how it works, when you have bosses. You don't follow orders and you get fired. It's not illegal to fire someone for cause (especially open defiance of direct orders).
- The press stated over and over that Comey was investigating Trump.
- Comey testified that he told Trump multiple times that Trump was not under investigation.
- Trump asked Comey to make this fact public.
- Comey refuses.
- Comey works for and answers to the President.
- He got fired.
There is no obstruction here, James.
Only obtusion from your side.
HB, left at 12 noon. Because he was leaving, err, well at 1 pm he is back, so stupid.
pederast,
trump had asked more than one person after he fired j. edgar comey if they were 'on his side' so to speak, and as it turns out his inquiries were prophetic. asking someone if they are on his team is not obstruction, and should not be interpreted as such by anyone with a functioning brain stem.
give trump credit. we're learning that all of his fears have been realized and he was right all along.
the DOJ, FBI, and perhaps other deep state traitors have been fucking with trump since day one. they fucked with his campaign, they fucked with his transition, and they have fucked with each and every day of his presidency to date.
if all you dumb bastards have to hang your hat on is the thin hope of an obstruction charge, trump can sleep easy.
And even a President of the United States does not have the right to ask an official of the United States government (not an "employee" of the President!) to put loyalty to the President above the official's loyalty to the "Constitution and the law of the United States could not only be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice, but to commit treason.
Hillary hires two more lawyers.
And later fired FBI Director Comey because he did not do what he asked.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
even alan dershowitz acknowledges that trump had every constitutional right to fire comey.
you're wrong again, pederast.
Worded better:
And even a President of the United States does not have the right to ask an official of the United States government (not an "employee" of the President!) to put loyalty to the President above the official's loyalty to the Constitution of the United States and the laws of the land WHICH could not only be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice, but to commit treason.
could not only be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice, but to commit treason.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
a lawyer you're not.
but an asshat and a pederast you are.
We shall see.
The FISA warrants was asked for in October . The investigation was commissioned to in July .
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The FISA warrants was asked for in October . The investigation was commissioned to in July .
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
that's nice.
This doesn't mean that objection of justice is refuted.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
This doesn't mean that objection of justice is refuted.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
WHAT obstruction of justice???
And even a President of the United States does not have the right to ask an official of the United States government (not an "employee" of the President!) to put loyalty to the President above the official's loyalty to the "Constitution and the law of the United States could not only be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice, but to commit treason.
Yes James... the director of the FBI serves at the pleasure of the President. He can be fired at will for any reason or for no reason what-so-ever. James Comey was not the first FBI director to be fired by the President (in fact Clinton fired one back in the 90s).
There is no "independent" government officials in the executive branch. They all answer to someone, and ultimately they all answer to the President.
You might want to brush up on your U.S. Government 101.
CNN Dutifully Transmits Another Self-Serving FBI/DOJ Leak: Trump Asked Rod Rosenstein in December if He Was "On My Team"
—Ace
Ah. I see.
Shocking.
I wonder if there might be any justification for Trump to ask that? Any special circumstances that might attend his presidency that would make him especially curious about whether FBI, CIA, and NSA agents were actually working against him?
Maybe some rational reason to suspect every step he takes he might be bitten by vipers underfoot?
[...]
A national security staffer leaks the transcript of Trump's phone call to the Australian president, letting Trump know that the national security people will actually endanger national security to get a petty dig at him.
James Comey would leak classified FBI documents to a pal to leak to the New York Times just to- - per Comey's admission -- get a special prosecutor apponted to investigate Trump.
And of course, Clapper and Comey would set up a "briefing," allegedly to inform Trump of the Steele Dossier, but actually contrived to create an excuse for CNN to report on the existence of the dossier. Within hours of this bullshit "briefing," someone very high in the intelligence/law enforcement community set off the RUSSIAN collusion narrative by leaking the existence of the briefing to CNN.
So why would Trump have any questions about whether these guys were on his side or, more likely, on the Democrat Party/Media's side?
And of course -- the same people who've been leaking to CNN for a year against Trump now leak against him again.
Gee, why would someone in that position wonder about who his alleged executive-branch employees were actually working for?
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/373640.php
You might want to brush up on your U.S. Government 101. " CHT
Jane knows so little, when she attempts to write on her own, well you know. Epic failure.
Moreover James...
Can you explain the "constitutional reason" for the FBI Director to give all indications to the media that the President is under investigation (harming the reputation of his boss)... while knowing himself that such allegations are false?
What possible "constitutional" motive did the FBI director have for implying a falsehood, while withholding the truth?
I can come up with plenty of "reasons". None of them seem particularly good reasons. In fact, all of them seem rather partisan, petty, and ultimately fucked up.
A President can fire an FBI director at any time, but it is not wise for a President to do so after asking the director to do something for no good legal reason and perhaps to try to hide the President's illegal actions -- and then lie about the reason for the dismissal while also bragging about the reason for the dismissal, namely, to shut down a worrisome investigation.
James.
The President was asking James Comey to tell the truth.
James Comey refused. Rather leaving the public believing a lie.
Those are the facts.
Comey himself testified under oath that not only was the President (under his watch) never personally under investigation (for any wrongdoing) - but that he told the President this on multiple occasions.
A person of god would not lie, James. But yet, here you are... openly lying rather than admit you are wrong. Not a very Christian thing to do.
Also, James...
Firing the FBI director does nothing to shut down any investigations. Comey was not personally either leading or involved in the Russian tampering investigation.
That investigation was run by people who worked under him. There was no reason to believe that firing Comey would end any of the 1000's of investigations taking place in the FBI.
Seriously James? Is that "really" how you think the FBI runs? Fire the director and everything comes to a halt? Are you really that gullible?
You make me laugh, Ch, at the way you twist reason and the language.
At the particular point that Comey was asked by the President if he personally was under investigation, he probably was not.
James is not a person of God. He's a charleton masquerading as one.
The investigation has now been exposed as so blindly partisan that it no longer has any credibility with the public.
Funny. Only Republicans seem to think that way. And only some of them.
At the particular point that Comey was asked by the President if he personally was under investigation, he probably was not.
And it was at that same exact particular time when Trump asked him to make that information public.
There is no good reason to hide the truth, James...
Why would you defend someone who wants to hide the truth?
Not a very Christian thing to do... let lies stand while you sit on the truth.
At the particular point that Comey was asked by the President if he personally was under investigation, he probably was not.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
can you not fucking read???
CH: Comey himself testified under oath that not only was the President (under his watch) never personally under investigation (for any wrongdoing) - but that he told the President this on multiple occasions.
The Backwards Logic of the Secret Memo
Jonathan Chait: “Amid all the lies Donald Trump has told about the Russia scandal, there is one underlying truth: The intelligence community truly fears him and considers him unfit for the presidency. This is not because the intelligence community is traitorous, or left wing, or (as Donald Trump Jr. sneeringly put it) wine-spritzer-drinking elites. It is because the IC had early access to a wide array of terrifying intelligence linking Trump and his orbit to Russia. People who spend their lives protecting their country from foreign threats saw in Trump a candidate who had at some level been compromised by one of them.
“Trump and his allies have viewed the causality the other way around. Because the IC distrusts Trump, its investigation of Trump’s connections to Russia is therefore illegitimate. Since his election, Trump has seized upon news of the investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia as evidence that the investigators cannot be trusted. If they were unbiased, he reasons, they wouldn’t have been investigating Trump in the first place.”
“The newly released memo by Republican staff follows the tracks of this reasoning.”
For Comey to have said that the President was not under investigation would imply that under no circumstancs would he be under investitation. There were apparently enough questions already in the air to suggest that such a statement shuld not be issued.
But when bragging to Russian officials, Trump said the firing was to shut down the investigation. If he feared not for himself, why wuld he do that?
When asked if the memo made him more likely to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein or if he still had confidence in Rosenstein, Axios reports Trump responded: “You figure that one out.”
I would say Rosenstein is on his way out but not right away.
Trump will bide his time.
For Comey to have said that the President was not under investigation would imply that under no circumstancs would he be under investitation.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
no it wouldn't.
it would STATE that at that moment and leading up the moment the question was asked, trump was not under investigation.
Commensa:
"The investigation has now been exposed as so blindly partisan that it no longer has any credibility with the public."
John McCain:
“The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s.”
The intelligence community truly fears him and considers him unfit for the presidency.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
oh, so THAT'S why they felt free to use un unverified dossier to lie to a FISA judge to gain a FISA warrant to "investigate" trump (take him down) under false pretenses.
chait has really been losing his shit leading up to the memo release.
heh.
John McCain:
“The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s.”
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
john,
go home. the grim reaper cometh. don't be an assclown right up until your dying breath. it's undignified.
Blogger Commonsense said...
I would say Rosenstein is on his way out but not right away.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
i see trump and rudy g playing a round at mar-a-lago this weekend.
James is under the mistaken impression that I give a shit what John McCain says.
Funny, jane has no opinions of his own
Buck SextonVerified account @BuckSexton · 3h3 hours ago
There is NOTHING in released FISA memo that any reasonable person who knows anything about intelligence work could claim endangers anyone or harms our national security.
That argument was all complete BS.
awwwww.....
The Democratic Party is carrying more than $6 million in debt, according to year-end filings — and has just $6.5 million in the bank. Do the math, and the party is working with just over $400,000 overall. Meanwhile, the Republicans are swimming in pools of money. The Republican National Committee had raised $132 million by the end of 2017 — about twice as much as the DNC — and entered 2018 with almost $40 million to spare, with not a penny of debt.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/752743/dnc-reportedly-dead-broke-rnc-nearly-40-million
For Comey to have said that the President was not under investigation
Which is not an unreasonable request since Comey cleared Hillary Clinton of all charges.
When Clinton was under investigation.
And before the investigation was completed.
Blogger Commonsense said...
James is under the mistaken impression that I give a shit what John McCain says.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
john mccain is under the mistaken impression that anyone on earth gives a shit what john mccain says.
The Federal Judge can recall the warrants he/she issued,nullifying all "evidence" collected.
"Commonsense said...
For Comey to have said that the President was not under investigation
Which is not an unreasonable request since Comey cleared Hillary Clinton of all charges.
When Clinton was under investigation.
And before the investigation was completed. "
You nailed it.
he Committee has now determined that the release of the Memorandum would be appropriate. The Executive Branch, across Administrations of both parties, has worked to accommodate congressional requests to declassify specific materials in the public interest.1 However, public release of classified information by unilateral action of the Legislative Branch is extremely rare and raises significant separation of powers concerns. Accordingly, the Committee’s request to release the Memorandum is interpreted as a request for declassification pursuant to the President’s authority.
While House rules allow a rarely used procedure to make classified information public without executive branch approval, the White House does not acknowledge that Congress and the White House worked together to fabricate the memo that does not repudiate the evidence of objection of justice or the possible Russian intervention provided by the chairman of the campaign intelligence secretary.
Yep...the memo was exactly what I expected...long on opinion, short on facts....The only thing proved is trump is scared shitless of the investigation and this whole smokescreen is around Fisa warrants of a proven liar and russian contact goofball carter page....Sad, it is all you got in that memo.....how the mighty ryan has been shown to be a trump hack....party before country...and trump plays golf LOLOLOL
CS very often does nail the hides of liberals here.
BTW...the dossier was a minor player in the warrant process....Judges still had to approve them and I would guess they are not partisan hacks like the sycophants here....too many checks and balances and they appear to have been followed...If not, you have a case, but you do not...
This could have been written by CH.
This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.
IMHO LOL
KD said...
CS very often does nail the hides of liberals here.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! He can barely find his way home at night.....
Trump keeps shoveling deeper and deeper....this ain't trump towers....LOL
BTW...the dossier was a minor player in the warrant process....
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
minor player? it was the foundation of the investigation, you dumb fuck.
The "Real CHT" is Roger. The "Objection of Justice" gives it away.
Must be liver toxicity.
Well Opie...
The Fact is that Carter Page was under FICA warrant for approximately a year, and he has not been charged with anything, there is almost nothing (even innuendo) that the FBI learned anything from him of value...and the FICA warrant expired for lack of probable cause to continue it.
Those are the facts.
Speculation that Trump is scared shitless - would be an opinion.
Suggesting that exposing the FBI is a "smoke screen" - would be an opinion.
I think it's telling that you cannot actually identify an actual "fact" from an opinion. It's funny that you then declare facts to be opinions, and speculation to be fact.
I sometimes seriously believe that you are a conservative troll attempting to make liberals look bad. If so, you do an excellent job.
Seems the stock market is now worried about trumps rising wages.....imagine that, unintended consequences....
The catalyst for Friday’s fall appeared to be a report that showed the strong United States economy might finally be translating into rising wages for American workers.
hey rog, remember the other day when you were trying to tell us how hard it is to get a FISA warrant?
The FISA court grants 99%+ of all requests for warrants and only hears from one side of each case, the governments. As a result, its proceedings have been plagued by falsehoods. In 2002, The FISA court complained that FBI agents made more than 75 false or misleading claims to secure warrants; a top FBI counterrorism official was prohibited from ever appearing there again. The court also rebuffed Attorney General John Ashcroft’s proposal to radically transform its purpose by making it easier for prosecutors to use FISA warrants to sweep up evidence for criminal prosecutions.
[...]
The FISA court complained that, in the final years of Obama’s presidency, the NSA was guilty of “an institutional lack of candor” connected to “a very serious Fourth Amendment issue;” naturally, the gory specifics were kept under wraps. Regardless, one of Obama’s last actions as president authorized NSA to share its vast trove of data on Americans with other federal agencies. If political abuse of data seized via FISA has not yet occurred, Obama’s “shovel-far-and-wide” bureaucratic bonanza makes it far more likely in the future.
The FISA court has always done a dismal job of overseeing the vast surveillance regime it helped spawn. FISA provided a stamp of legitimacy for perpetual deceit and perhaps the worst trampling of constitutional rights in American history.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/02/02/trump-nunes-memo-russia-investigation-fbi-congress-bovard-column/1088740001/
McCabe did in fact testify under oath that there would not have been a FISA warrant if not for the dossier.
BTW...the dossier was a minor player in the warrant process.
According to Catherine Harriage it was the at the top line of the FISA application and played up throughout the document.
Minor it wasn't.
CH posts another moronic opinion.....shich proves nothing....
and he has not been charged with anything, there is almost nothing
Brilliant CH, you really showed complete lack of understanding of what the warrant is about...You have no idea what they learned and still make an inane comment like that. The point you miss, the whole memo revolves around something that yielded nothing according to you, which makes the whole thing even dumber than you!!!!! Sad how far you have fallen....
Judges still had to approve them and I would guess they are not partisan hacks like the sycophants here
That's sort of the point, Opie... if you haven't figured it out.
The DOJ/FBI basically mislead the Judges. They hid the fact that the dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign, that the author was someone who openly declared that he was out to stop Trump from being elected. They provided a Yahoo story as further evidence, while literally stating that the story was not from the same source (when they knew it was).
In other words... they lied to the judge to get a warrant.
Imagine if the Trump DOJ mislead and flat out lied to a FICA judge to garner a warrant to eavesdrop someone from his 2020 opponents political campaign? You would want those people drawn and quartered.
But I guess misleading a FISA court so you can spy on your political opponents is okay if your political opponent is Trump. That seems to be the concensus (Jonathan Chait and others argue as much)
Page is more screwed up than you CH....but still was a target
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/18/magazine/what-if-anything-does-carter-page-know.html?&hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
After the election, Trump’s advisers continued to distance their boss from Page. When Page, returning to Moscow in December, talked to Russian reporters about Trump’s victory and promoted his ties to the president-elect, the Trump campaign’s lawyer, Don McGahn (now the White House counsel), sent Page a “cease and desist” letter. “You never met Mr. Trump, nor did you ever ‘advise’ Mr. Trump about anything,” McGahn wrote. “You are thus not an ‘adviser’ to Mr. Trump in any sense of the word.” In January, a week before Trump’s inauguration, Stephen K. Bannon, the incoming White House chief strategist, got wind that Page was planning to appear on MSNBC and called him and told him to cancel the appearance.
“The team is only as strong as the weakest link,” Page told me. “And it’s not that I’m a weak link. It’s just that I’m the link getting smashed with an anvil.” Testifying before the House Intelligence Committee in November, he lamented, “Unfortunately, I am the biggest embarrassment surrounding the campaign.”
Page hasn’t always helped himself in his dealings with investigators. For more than a year, he vacillated on whether he had
You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.
met with any Russian government officials on that Moscow trip. But in his November testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, Page was forced to admit that he had written a memo to fellow Trump campaign advisers describing a “private conversation” during the trip with deputy prime minister Arkady Dvorkovich, who “expressed strong support for Mr. Trump and a desire to work together toward devising better
wow.
a ny times piece on carter page that's a month and a half old.
LOL.
good one d0pie.
The "Real CHT" is Roger. The "Objection of Justice" gives it away.
Must be liver toxicity."
HB is a technology Retard.
CH continues his disingenuous BS with
if you haven't figured it out.
Wow you finally figure it out....impressive and naive...
The DOJ/FBI basically mislead the Judges.
Once again, your unsubstantiated opinion based on Nunes hearsay and talking heads....Sorry, it you give up on judicial, why don't you just move to Norway.....its very white there...The dossier was a bit player and in reality, you have no idea what the rest of the application had do you? And what does clinton have to do with anything????? But you sure can make up shit in massive bowel movements like this. You have absolutely no evidence of anyone misleading a judge, just opinion. Try again you are losing bigly.....LOL
opie reminds me of a homeless person talking gibberish.
Only opie makes less sense
He must not even understand himself
So opie...
The House Intelligence Committee releases a declassified memo that includes information on sworn testimony and subpoenaed information.... that was looked at and edited by the high ranking members of the FBI itself....
and you call it unsubstantiated opinion based on hearsay and talking heads.
Yep... a conservative troll pretending to be a dumb liberal. You are doing a fine job.
James Comey
✔
@Comey
That’s it? Dishonest and misleading memo wrecked the House intel committee, destroyed trust with Intelligence Community, damaged relationship with FISA court, and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen. For what? DOJ & FBI must keep doing their jobs.
10:47 AM - Feb 2, 2018
23,194 23,194 Replies 43,558 43,558 Retweets 100,281 100,281 likes
For CH....he feels judges are being misled
Over at lawfareblog.com, the indispensable source of legal analysis on all matters arising in the Russia investigation, Orin Kerr, the nationally renowned student of criminal procedure, offers an analysis of how judges deal with problematic informants, as Steele is alleged to be. Kerr makes plain, from a review of a long train of cases, that in most circumstances the motives of sources are irrelevant to judges as they consider an application for a warrant. Most judges, Kerr observes, assume that informants have personal axes to grind; they would be foolish not to.
The key question for a judge considering a warrant is not whether the informant harbors bias, but whether the information obtained from the informant can be corroborated from other materials. If an application is based on a single source, and that source is dubious, the application might well fail.
Though the FISA court operates in strict secrecy, the standards for a successful surveillance application are known to be extraordinarily stringent. The government must demonstrate “probable cause,” but in most cases, according to multiple accounts of how the Justice Department actually operates, prosecutors and investigators routinely nail things down well beyond the “probable cause” standard.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/desperate-devious-dishonest-nunes-memo-article-1.3795584
https://lawfareblog.com/dubious-legal-claim-behind-releasethememo
CH the above is a must read for the ill informed like you....
And what does clinton have to do with anything?????
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
her campaign paid for the steele dossier, fuckstick.
The House Intelligence Committee releases a declassified memo that includes information on sworn testimony and subpoenaed information.
Which only proves you will believe anything.....LOL
CH is unable to understand that what he believes is contrary to the truth.
Though the FISA court operates in strict secrecy, the standards for a successful surveillance application are known to be extraordinarily stringent. The government must demonstrate “probable cause,” but in most cases, according to multiple accounts of how the Justice Department actually operates, prosecutors and investigators routinely nail things down well beyond the “probable cause” standard.
HT James
:that does not repudiate the evidence of objection of justice "
Alky your pot belly got in the way and you got caught fat handed attempting g to use our hosts ID. But, since you're a technological Ludite, CS easy caught you.
That is a fucking lie
her campaign paid for the steele dossier,
SO FUCKING WHAT< FUCKSTICK!!!!
CS easy caught you.
The only thing menstral cramp can catch is the flu.....asshole..
Dishonest and misleading memo wrecked the House intel committee
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
no it didn't. the intel committee survives intact no problem. next!
"destroyed trust with Intelligence Community"
you mean the CORRUPT TO THE FUCKING CORE intelligence community?
next!
"damaged relationship with FISA court"
the FBI did that itself, with the original filing and three renewals by using phony, unvetted, clinton paid for bullshit to get a warrant.
next!
"and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen"
yeah, a FRAUDULENT investigation of an american citizen.
"DOJ & FBI must keep doing their jobs."
DOJ needs new leadership. the FBI needs to be destroyed. even whitey bulger must be laughing his ass off today.
Though the FISA court operates in strict secrecy, the standards for a successful surveillance application are known to be extraordinarily stringent.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
LOL. yeah, that's why 99% of the warrant applications are granted.
it's really super duper hard guys.
Though the FISA court operates in strict secrecy, the standards for a successful surveillance application are known to be extraordinarily stringent. The government must demonstrate “probable cause,” but in most cases, according to multiple accounts of how the Justice Department actually operates, prosecutors and investigators routinely nail things down well beyond the “probable cause” standard.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
show your work, alky. show your work:
The desperate, devious, dishonest Nunes memo: Let us count the ways the partisan hit-job offends reason
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/desperate-devious-dishonest-nunes-memo-article-1.3795584
one of the more BIASED OP-ED'S you'll read today.
LOL.
Calling into question the source, doesn't mean that the information is considered incorrect.
:that does not repudiate the evidence of objection of justice "
Alky your pot belly got in the way and you got caught fat handed attempting g to use our hosts ID. But, since you're a technological Ludite, CS easy caught you.
I have the link open.
Nunes is violating the historical record for the intelligence committee history of non-partisanship since it was created.
He's got his head up Trump's ass, right next to you.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Calling into question the source, doesn't mean that the information is considered incorrect.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A) it's an op-ed. by definition it's his opinion that obtaining a FISA warrant is hard.
B) the author is a self admitted never trumper.
C) the title of the piece speaks for itself to its own blatant biases. no wonder you selectively leave It and the link off your copy/paste.
i've known you long enough alky to be sure that you are the most dishonest poster on this blog.
and for fuck's sake do a little homework once in a while. you rarely read the shit you post, let alone research the folks who write it.
Nunes is violating the historical record for the intelligence committee history of non-partisanship since it was created.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
nunes is revealing the FBI and DOJ to be corrupt frauds. every single person who signed off on the FISA warrant application and 3 subsequent renewals KNEW the dossier was complete bullshit paid for by team hillary.
lying to a FISA court judge - that's a fucking CRIME.
we won, alky. and this is far from over.
heh.
:that does not repudiate the evidence of objection of justice "
Alky your pot belly got in the way and you got caught fat handed attempting g to use our hosts ID. But, since you're a technological Ludite, CS easy caught you.
Roger apologize to CHT.
Another blatant lie.
nunes is revealing the FBI and DOJ to be corrupt frauds. every single person who signed off on the FISA warrant application and 3 subsequent renewals KNEW the dossier was complete bullshit paid for by team hillary.
Apologize for the use of my name.
"Nunes is violating the historical record for the intelligence committee history of non-partisanship since it was created."
The frequent illegal leaks (a not so hidden secret that they came from Adam Schiff the ranking Democrat) sure destroyed any illusion that this committee was non-partisan.
Pot belly? It went away after the transplant surgery that removed my 30lbs liver. Thank you so much for for your generosity in paying for my transplant surgery and all the associated medical care.
It's a lot of $$$$$$==$$$$$$$$$
that does not repudiate the evidence of objection of justice "
Alky your pot belly got in the way and you got caught fat handed attempting g to use our hosts ID. But, since you're a technological Ludite, CS easy caught you.
Roger apologize to CHT.
Come on coward, do the right thing.
K'putz false identity published a lie.
The frequent illegal leaks (a not so hidden secret that they came from Adam Schiff the ranking Democrat) sure destroyed any illusion that this committee was non-partisan.
Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Then-DAG Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.
Mr. Boente and Mr. Rosenstein are both Trump administration officials — the general counsel of the F.B.I. and the deputy attorney general, respectively. Under Justice Department regulations, it is Mr. Rosenstein who appointed and oversees Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel leading the Russia investigation. Mr. Rosenstein controls the scope of Mr. Mueller’s jurisdiction, can block him from taking steps like issuing indictments and is the only official who can fire him. If Mr. Trump used the wiretapping of Mr. Page to justify removing Mr. Rosenstein, the president could install someone who might be more willing to constrain or end the investigation.
The Problem with Tribalism
Andrew Sullivan: “It triggers a deep and visceral response: a defense of the tribe before all other considerations. That means, in its modern manifestation, that the tribe comes before the country as a whole, before any neutral institutions that get in its way, before reason and empiricism, and before the rule of law. It means loyalty to the tribe — and its current chief — is enforced relentlessly. And this, it seems to me, is the underlying reason why the investigation into Russian interference in the last election is now under such attack and in such trouble. In a tribalized society, there can be no legitimacy for an independent inquiry, indifferent to tribal politics. In this fray, no one is allowed to be above it.
“On the face of it, of course, no one even faintly patriotic should object to investigating how a foreign power tried to manipulate American democracy, as our intelligence agencies have reported. And yet one party is quite obviously doing all it can to undermine such a project — even when it is led by a Republican of previously unimpeachable integrity, Robert Mueller. Tribalism does not spare the FBI; it cannot tolerate an independent Department of Justice; it sees even a Republican like Mueller as suspect; and it sees members of another tribe as incapable of performing their jobs without bias.”
President Donald Trump’s Justice Department had reason to suspect that former Trump campaign associate Carter Page was a Russian agent, according to a Republican memo.
The contentious and secret memo, allegedly created by Republicans to discredit the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, shows that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein approved an application to continue surveillance of Page, sources told The New York Times.
The memo alleges that the FBI and Justice Department did not adequately explain to a judge that they were relying partly on research by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele when they sought to renew a warrant for surveillance of Page from the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Court (FISA). Steele was the author of the highly controversial Russia dossier that alleged that Russia had been cultivating Trump for years.
that does not repudiate the evidence of objection of justice "
Alky your pot belly got in the way and you got caught fat handed attempting g to use our hosts ID. But, since you're a technological Ludite, CS easy caught you.
Roger apologize to CHT.
As always you fail at being a man.
Pfffttt
The Problem with Tribalism
Andrew Sullivan: “It triggers a deep and visceral response: a defense of the tribe before all other considerations. That means, in its modern manifestation, that the tribe comes before the country as a whole, before any neutral institutions that get in its way, before reason and empiricism, and before the rule of law.
___________________________________________
And that explains the Democrats under Obama. What a zoo.
See we are back to more political_lire cut-n-paste shit from the "pastor" and Roger thinking everyone is KD
and he does a ton of cut-n-paste shit too, just not tirelessly from the SAME website EVERY FUCKING DAY, like a puppet on strings. well maybe he does too but I haven't noticed...
ROFLMFAO
Roger apologize to CHT.
Go do your pig wife, idiot...
The key question for a judge considering a warrant is not whether the informant harbors bias, but whether the information obtained from the informant can be corroborated from other materials. If an application is based on a single source, and that source is dubious, the application might well fail.
Correct... which is why they leaked the same information from the same source to the news media, and then used that news media report to "corroborate" the dossier... by falsely stating that the Yahoo story was not from the same source (even as they knew it was).
Perhaps, you should actually read the memo.... so you would't be foolishly blindsided by the facts.
one of the more BIASED OP-ED'S you'll read today.
Yep...that right wing NY Daily News is off its mark...too funny rat hole....the paper is written for a 5th grade level....right in your wheel house...lOL
so you would't be foolishly blindsided by the facts.
And you get blindsided by the bullshit.,....LOL
The Yahoo reporter said that not the source. I just heard him being interviewed .
Isokoff is lying.
The Yahoo reporter said that not the source. I just heard him being interviewed
And Richard Steele admitted in British Court Findings that he met with and provided the information from the dossier to Yahoo news (and other outlets) just prior to Yahoo news account came out.
Problem with the logic Roger:
1) if there was another source, then Yahoo had two sources (but only suggested that they had one).
2) The items in the dossier regarding Carter Page were wrong. It was eventually shown that he was not in the meetings that Steele suggested he was (and was in fact in an entirely different part of Russia meeting with entirely different people). Which would suggest that two people had the exact same "wrong" information?
The FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it," the FBI said earlier this week. "As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.
You obviously believe the biggest liar in history over the FBI director appointee by Trump.
#Trumpism
What facts? IN the memo??? I'm not stupid, you definitely are.
"As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.
If they have "grave concerns about material omissions", then they can fill in the blanks can't they?
It's all irrelevant CH. It doesn't refute anything as to Russian intervention or objection of justice .
The standards for the FISA warrants are responsible doubt. You can not refute anything as. You don't like the truth. This is a distraction from the real disaster of President Donald Trump.
If they have "grave concerns about material omissions", then they can fill in the blanks can't they?
Pure speculation. No facts. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one. Yours are not based upon the truth.
Well you got two possibilities Roger.
1. Since they said there were material omissions then they would have to know what those omissions were and therefore could tell us.
2. There are no material omissions and they were talking out their ass in a vain attempt to keep an embarrassing memo from being released.
You choose.
You can not refute anything as.
I'm sure that we can refute with 100% certainty there was an Objection of Justice.
Why your President is scared shitless.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation has gathered enough steam that some lawyers representing key Donald Trump associates are considering the possibility of a historic first: an indictment against a sitting president.
While many legal experts contend that Mueller lacks the standing to bring criminal charges against Trump, at least two attorneys working with clients swept up in the Russia probe told POLITICO they consider it possible that Mueller could indict the president for obstruction of justice.
Story Continued Below
Neither attorney claimed to have specific knowledge of Mueller’s plans. Both based their opinions on their understanding of the law; one also cited his interactions with the special counsel’s team, whose interviews have recently examined whether Trump tried to derail the probe into his campaign’s Russia ties.
“If I were a betting man, I’d bet against the president,” said one of the lawyers.
The second attorney, who represents a senior Trump official, speculated that Mueller could try to bring an indictment against Trump even if he expects the move to draw fierce procedural challenges from the president’s lawyers – if only to demonstrate the gravity of his findings.
“It’s entirely possible that Mueller may go that route on the theory that, as an open question, it should be for the courts to decide,” the attorney said. “Even if the indictment is dismissed, it puts maximum pressure on Congress to treat this with the independence and intellectual honesty that it will never, ever get."
The lawyers’ assessments hardly resolve the public debate about whether a federal prosecutor can indict a sitting president — one that several attorneys involved in the Russia probe said they are closely tracking through online op-eds and Twitter dustups. (“It’s so much fun!” said one.)
I doubt of Mueller will ever go that far.
But if he does he will find himself on the wrong side of a disbarment hearing for malicious prosecution.
Pure speculation. No facts. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one. Yours are not based upon the truth.
This became particularly amusing since you posted an empty fantasy about Trump being indicted.
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile.
Sorry Roger...
but material "omission" of fact is still a fancy way of admitting that everyone stated in the memo was factually accurate. It had been reported prior to the FBI statement, that the FBI brass who reviewed it, could not point to any factual inaccuracies. The wording of their statement confirms those reports.
In other words. It's all true on fact. The FBI disagrees with the conclusions.
As I have continually stated, I believe that the FBI/DOJ/President should all declassify the entire FISA application. All the facts, no omissions, no spin. Then we can all judge for ourselves.
And let's be crystal clear here Roger. The DOJ/FBI had other options.
They could have actually spent some time attempting to corroborate the dossier, especially as it pertained to Carter Page. If reporters can take the time to figure out that Page was in a completely different portion of Russia than the dossier claimed he was, then the FBI could have come to those same conclusions prior to trying to get a FISA warrant.
In other words, investigate all you want. Do the research. Confirm what the sources told you. This is what the FISA courts sort of expects when they want corroboration of a single source.
If they hadn't done enough background to determine for sure is he was actually meeting with the people they claim... then what good is getting a surveillance warrant?
It's almost as if they were more interested in getting permission to put the guy under surveillance than they were to find out if the allegations from the dossier were actually true.
We have the rule of law, and fourth amendment rights that are supposed to protect us from overreaching law enforcement. I am not sure exactly why this doesn't bother you. I am pretty sure if the Trump White House was spying on their political opponents by citing private research to the FISA courts without verification... that you might find that alarming?
Devin Nunes' election opponent just raised $100,000.
The American people know he's a shitbag who has no business running the House Intelligence Committee.
Look what whore showed up.
What nunes opponent? Do far he's got s bunch of no names in a primary several months away.
Jonathan Turley is on tv asking where are the grave dangers to national security dems howled about?
Good question.
"Jonathan Turley is on tv asking where are the grave dangers to national security dems howled about?"
Easy - whacked out democrats
GayD: Go trail your anal bleeding back to the gay gloryhole you crawled out of, faggot.
"The Democratic Party is carrying more than $6 million in debt, according to year-end filings — and has just $6.5 million in the bank. Do the math, and the party is working with just over $400,000 overall. Meanwhile, the Republicans are swimming in pools of money. The Republican National Committee had raised $132 million by the end of 2017 — about twice as much as the DNC — and entered 2018 with almost $40 million to spare, with not a penny of debt.".
Funny
They had enough information and enough background(he met with Russians several times, . They had determined for sure is he was actually meeting with the people they claim... then what good is getting a surveillance warrant? That was sufficient to get a FISA warrant. And they are not handed out just for the hell of it. The judges had to get enough probable cause to issue the surveillance warrant. Some of those who haven't read much, you perhaps, don't seem to grasp that those warrants are not given willy nilly to private citizens on a feeling or "hunch" as we often see here by many.
Second, the investigation started in July, this warrant was issued in October, so, your point is? Or is it just the usual Trump can do nothing wrong and anything is just a bunch of left wing hacks in the FBI and DOJ that hated Trump?
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile.
KD hacked my id again .
The bottom line on they claim that one FISA warrant should discredit the Muller commission . It's just unbelievable. They are acting like a banana republic.
One of the greatest honors of my life was walking across the stage at the F.B.I. Academy and receiving my special agent badge from the director at the time, Robert Mueller. After 21 weeks of intensive training, my class swore an oath and became federal agents entrusted with the solemn duty of protecting Americans and upholding the Constitution.
After more than a decade of service, which included investigating terrorism, working to rescue kidnapping victims overseas and being special assistant to the director, I am reluctantly turning in my badge and leaving an organization I love. Why? So I can join the growing chorus of people who believe that the relentless attacks on the bureau undermine not just America’s premier law enforcement agency but also the nation’s security. My resignation is painful, but the alternative of remaining quiet while the bureau is tarnished for political gain is impossible.
A small number of my current and retired colleagues have said that we should simply keep our heads down until the storm passes. I say this with the greatest respect: They are wrong. If those who know the agency best remain silent, it will be defined by those with partisan agendas.
F.B.I. agents are dogged people who do not care about the direction of political winds. But to succeed in their work, they need public backing. Scorched-earth attacks from politicians with partisan goals now threaten that support, raising corrosive doubts about the integrity of the F.B.I. that could last for generations.
When the F.B.I. knocks on someone’s door or appeals to the public for assistance in solving crime, the willingness of people to help is directly correlated to their opinion of the agency. When an agent working to stop a terrorist plot attempts to recruit an informant, the agent’s success in gathering critical intelligence depends on the informant’s belief that the agent is credible and trustworthy. And, as the former director, James Comey, would frequently say in underscoring the importance of high standards, whether a jury believes an agent’s testimony depends on whether it has faith in the bureau’s honesty and independence. To be effective, the F.B.I. must be believed and must maintain the support of the public it serves.
Do F.B.I. agents make mistakes? You bet. They are human beings. Because they are not infallible, the bureau is subject to a robust system of checks and balances, including its internal affairs division, the Department of Justice inspector general, congressional committees and the courts. These watchdogs ensure that personal opinions regarding politics, causes and candidates do not affect investigations. The system also provides an outlet for any investigator who suspects malfeasance on the part of the agency’s leadership to make those concerns known.
What, then, are we to make of the recent allegations of political bias at the F.B.I., particularly those involving two employees whose cringe-worthy text messages continue to threaten the agency’s reputation? While it would be disingenuous to claim that those two are not at least guilty of exercising incredibly poor judgment, it would be equally disingenuous for anyone who really knows the modern-day bureau to insinuate that the organization is plotting from within.
Furthermore, a congressional memo released on Friday accuses the F.B.I. and the Justice Department of abusing their surveillance powers to spy on a former Trump campaign adviser. But every statement of fact included in an affidavit for foreign intelligence collection must withstand the scrutiny of at least 10 people in the Department of Justice hierarchy before it is reviewed by an independent court.
ADVERTISEMENT
There is, however, a difference between oversight by those in charge of holding the F.B.I. accountable and criticism by politicians seeking partisan gain. Political operatives are weaponizing their disagreement with a particular investigation in a bid to undermine the credibility of the entire institution. “The system is rigged” is their slogan, and they are now politicizing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act process used to collect critical intelligence about our adversaries.
The assumption among confused and dismayed F.B.I. employees is that the attacks are meant to soften the blow should the investigation by Mr. Mueller, the special counsel, lead to additional charges. However, these kinds of attacks by powerful people go beyond mere criticism — they could destroy the institution. Although those critics’ revisionist supporters claim their ire is reserved for institutional leadership and not the rank and file, it is the F.B.I. agent on the street who will be most severely affected as public support for federal law enforcement is sacrificed for partisan gain.
These political attacks on the bureau must stop. If those critics of the agency persuade the public that the F.B.I. cannot be trusted, they will also have succeeded in making our nation less safe.
Josh Campbell (@joshscampbell) is a former supervisory special agent with the F.B.I. who served as a counterterrorism investigator and special assistant to the bureau’s director
This is the first time in history that the President and the Republican party, is attacking the justice system and the 0FBI for his own political gain .
Well Roger I would think the civil libertarian in you would be just a little concerned that you can be spied on and have your privacy invaded on the say so of your political opponents.
Do F.B.I. agents make mistakes? You bet. They are human beings. Because they are not infallible
Stubbing your foot is a mistake, this is big time abuse of government police power and it's a disgrace.
Ever wonder where broke pot belly Alky got his education?
"This is the first time in history that the President and the Republican party, is attacking the justice system and the 0FBI for his own political gain ."
Yet. Routinely done by Democrats.
You should have called this (Speculation).
You "speculate" to come to conclusions. Maybe. ... The (Speculation) that the FBI requested a FISA warrant, (allegedly) using politically motivated charges is unadulterated (speculation).
I am speculating that the memo isn't going to alter the direction of the investigation into the Russian intervention into the election. I'm not going to speculate on the outcome of the investigation. But I will say that the memo , looks like a young staffers, over a few beers and pizza. "Let's use "Clinton" as often as possible. The President will love it!" National security doesn't matter as long as we discredit the Muller commission!
You can speculate on the memo all you want. I'm speculating that the memo isn't going change a thing. I'm stating that the opioid addicted, fat bellied, married to a mail order bride, financially devastate, high school graduate has devastated the (speculation) that the FISA warrant will not stop the investigation is a clear and present danger to the President because he has committed at least two felonies.
HB, maybe IF, you didn't constantly talk about yourself.
Take your argument to this patriot and tell us what happened .
Josh Campbell (@joshscampbell) is a former supervisory special agent with the F.B.I. who served as a counterterrorism investigator and special assistant to the bureau’s director.
Hillary, paying a former spy of another nation to pay Russians to make up pure fiction on her political opponents, then getting the Doj, the fbi and a Federal US Judge to take legal action on that body of work is just fine.
If your accusations of drug addiction and belittling my lovely wife i wouldn't tell you to go fuck Daisy.
False
Take your argument to this patriot and tell us what happened .
Be glad to. Because the one thing that the memo showed is that the "robust system of checks and balances" failed miserably when the leadership is politicized to the point is uses the agency as a political weapon.
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile.
Devin Nunes admitted that he did not read the underlying intelligence report.
Hack Hack Hack Hack Hack Hack
You believe the FBI and DOJ are an "agency as a political weapon."
Coo koo.
Put down the coconut oil and vodka in the drain. It's frying your Mensa senses.
ZZ-ZZZZZZ-ZZZZZZ-ZZZZZZ
You believe the FBI and DOJ are an "agency as a political weapon."
The FBI got a FISA warrant to spy on a private citizen based on an opposition research document from a presidential campaign that at least some key leaders and investigators supported.
Can't imagine why someone wouldn't believe it.
As that say in the trade, "this is bad optics".
Devin Nunes admitted that he did not read the underlying intelligence report.
Speaking of hackery, it was not the intelligence report, it was the FISA warrant application.
And it was Trey Gowdy who read the application instead of Nunes because, you know, he was a US attorney.
Gowdy also coauthored the memo.
Post a Comment