weaponization of the irs, fbi and doj. Obama's true legacy.
That is funny, ballz.....LOL
The trump legacy will be remembered as the most corrupt administration evah!!!! And just think, mueller ain't done yet and he has how many guilty pleas???? More coming!!!
"Weaponization" of the IRS, FBI and DOJ is way over the edge, Lerner "targeting" notwithstanding. But they were heavily politicized at the highest levels.
One can draw a lot of parallels between this Trump administration and the Grant administration and it's not that outrageous that if this continues, Trump could eclipse Grant as presiding over the most corrupt. I think that we're a little early to predict it either way yet.
So what are the national security implications if it's official US policy that North Korea has denuclearized, but they're actually holding on to nuclear warheads and missiles capable of delivering them? And retain stockpiles of weapons grade materials?
Trump is already claiming that NK has denuclearized, "and we didn't give anything up!"
OK I'll accept that someone might be able to express himself only as a child would, and yet be capable in other areas. There could be some lingual deficiency, or a psychological block. But even accepting that possibility, when this kind of magical thinking substitutes for concrete objectives, and it has real impact on our national defense, just how far are we willing to let it go?
Anonymous Myballs said... I used the term weaponization purposefully. And i dont require your approval to do so.
I wasn't suggesting that you needed anyone's approval. But you did ask if he was joking, and since "weaponization" is not a realistic description for most people I think it's a legitimate point to raise.
You might be surprised. Grant, like Trump, was elected with no clear mandate but addressing corruption ("drain the swamp") quickly became thematic. His early administration was marked by chaos, and of course with the indictments the comparison is natural.
Even though Grant ran his cabinet in military style, and Trump seeks a CEO style of management, I find parallels in temperament and style, which are interesting if they lead to the same sorts of issues.
I am in favor of the DNC suing the sitting President. Because, the defendant gets to depose ever one they want. So, depose Obama, Hillary , comey, mccabe, and a 100 others. And the millions it will drain from the DNC.
Do you think it might be said that Trump tends to extend his trust to those subordinates whose loyalty he values? Perhaps to an extent that results in his own detriment? Like President Grant ...
And in foreign policy decisions, and even in some domestic matters, Grant had the tendency to go his own way regardless of the advice of his staff ... similar to Trump. Grant had a deep, perhaps overweening, belief that his own intuition was superior to learned or experienced opinion.
Anonymous Myballs said... I used the term weaponization purposefully.
Yeah sure....you heard that term on faux fake news....and stole it because you can't think for yourself....As for am I kidding...no, just like you using weaponization, I maintain they are the most corrupt evah....just look at fruit and his BS....the first class flights, the charter of airplanes....who spent all that money in Italy? The D's? I think not....just the tip of ice berg has been seen...Zinke is another fraud....pompeo right behind him....
This guy is a Hero. James Shaw Jr., the father of a 4-year-old daughter, told a news conference flanked by Nashville Mayor David Briley and local and federal law enforcement officials that he was thinking simply of self-preservation when he wrestled the assault-style rifle away from the assailant during a rampage in which four people were killed.
"I'm not a hero, I'm just a regular person," the Nashville native said, pausing as tears rolled down his cheeks. "I just wanted to live."
So what are the national security implications if it's official US policy that North Korea has denuclearized, but they're actually holding on to nuclear warheads and missiles capable of delivering them? And retain stockpiles of weapons grade materials?
how many pallets of ca$h has trump flown into pyongyang in the middle of the night?
Small difference, when if they do what they've "agreed" to it won't be denuclearization. He is inventing his "reality" to suit his ego, and it's beginning to collide with our national security - and you want to quibble with how I phrased it.
But keep on pretending that the emperor is resplendently dressed. I'm just wondering how far you're willing to let it go. Evidently, Trump's not knowing or not caring what North Korea is really doing now, or has indicated that they might do, is not too far for you.
My question to you was (still is), WHEN it happens that Trump pretends that North Korea has denuclearized, and when he's made US policy to reflect that pretense, will you still think that's just fine and dandy? He has already implied that he wants to go that way.
"WHEN it happens that Trump pretends that North Korea has denuclearized, and when he's made US policy to reflect that pretense, will you still think that's just fine and dandy? He has already implied that"
He implied no such thing.
Anyway, you were fine and dandy when Obama aided Iran...AND did absolutely nothing to STOP NK.
Sure he did! He's claiming that their actions and suggestions are agreeing to denuclearization. When you're already bragging about those proposed steps as "agreeing to denuclearization", you are accepting that fulfilling them are denuclearization.
You can insist that it's just a negotiation tactic if you want, and I won't argue to much, but if so he's doing it backwards. His tactic would be "you promise 'not much' and we'll basically 'give up nothing' and we'll call it denuclearization." Kiss his robes.
And by the way, what *I* wanted Obama to do with North Korea had *you* were tutting about me being a war-monger, about the risk I proposed. I've been consistent about it since the Bush days, so don't give me that "your were fine with it" snark.
"And by the way, what *I* wanted Obama to do with North Korea had *you* were tutting about me being a war-monger, about the risk I proposed. I've been consistent about it since the Bush days, so don't give me that "your were fine with it" snark."
I'll actually be happy to see a deal for a denuclearized Korea and I won't complain overmuch if it includes outright bribery. But I'm a realist and when something starts with bullshit, I expect more bullshit.
If you want to be realistic about what North Korea HAS said, they have suspended nuclear and ballistics tests in the period of time up to the anticipated summit. He suspended tests before the Olympics also; it's not necessarily a long term proposal. We've seen this before.
And if he's dismantling nuclear sites - other than the one that's unstable and probably unusable after that last test - that's probably being pretty "creative" (Trump style "creative") with what he's calling a nuclear testing site.
What's wrong with just acknowledging the truth, that I've held this same position for literally decades, always asking when President will stop saying "we will never tolerate a nuclear North Korea" and start actually not tolerating it? EVERY President.
To negotiate a true de-nuclearization, Trump is going to have to agree to eliminate nukes and delivery systems from South Korea, and possibly Japan. NK is also going to demand that the USA draw down or withdraw from military bases.
I certainly hope that an enforceable bilateral regime is established before Trump bargains that away.
We have delivery systems in both places and from time to time nuclear naval forces have docked in Japanese waters. I don't know whether any of our nuclear delivery systems have been locked and loaded in South Korea since 1991, but I suspect yes and I'm certain that this will be one of Kim Yong Un's demands. Because it frequently has been.
Whether or not "that is not an option" with Trump remains to be seen. It all remains to be seen with Trump. He's making noises that economic sanctions have brought North Korea to the bargaining table, but I very much doubt that. Yong Un thinks that he has the superior bargaining position because he believes that the world trembles at his nuclear might.
This is my opinion, obviously. I don't have any special window into his mind. But I am very confident that lifting sanctions and allowing NK to participate in the brotherhood of nations is not even a beginning.
BONO's come to Jesus moment "The Irish singer and co-founder of ONE, a campaigning group that fights poverty and disease in Africa, said it had been “a humbling thing for me” to realize the importance of capitalism and entrepreneurialism in philanthropy, particularly as someone who “got into this as a righteous anger activist with all the cliches.”
“Job creators and innovators are just the key, and aid is just a bridge,” he told an audience of 200 leading technology entrepreneurs and investors at the F.ounders tech conference in Dublin. “We see it as startup money, investment in new countries. A humbling thing was to learn the role of commerce.”
Too bad the bible thumping trump supporters don't have the same revelation as Bono....maybe you should follow his example and cut down another tree for Jesus....LOL
Just saw preliminary deficit numbers for the next fiscal year....Good going R's and congress....$1 trillion is right around the corner!!! Yep, the end is near for you Jesus loving wood burning polluting hypocrites....LOLOLOLOL
How soon you conveniently forget that the busch recession and imfunded wars drove those numbers...But why let a fact get in the way of your idiotic opinion,....thansx for p[laying..... asshole...
AZ seems like a lock for the vote Dem,
no it doesn't asshole....
I know you are not smart enough to think of that, but another nice try....
According to the U.S National Bureau of Economic Research, the Great Recession started in December 2007 and ended in June 2009. President Barack Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009, so it had already started before he entered office.
The first thing you notice when looking at the federal deficits from fiscal 2007 (the U.S. government fiscal year ends in September) is that it increased by almost $1 trillion from fiscal 2008 (two months before Obama was elected and four months before he was sworn in) to fiscal 2009. It remained over $1 trillion per year for four years and got below Bush’s last years deficit in fiscal 2015. It continued to decrease until Obama’s last year and has increased in Trump’s first year in office.
"The McCabe probe is exposing the justice dept for trying to shut down the hillary investigation by the fbi."
We can only hope it is so. But Coldheart thinks that American people are hankering to hang McCabe for denying that he was the leak, and that they don't care what he was exposing.
So if he's right, the McCabe probe will not expose anything; it will squash it and future leaks by dealing harshly with him. There won't be a whiff of the DOJ corruption, just exaggerated accusations regarding McCabe and only McCabe. But since he's already been fired, I think they'll just bury it. If he IS charged, it will be mainly because he back-stabbed his boss to further his own personal advancement.
Fiscal 2008: $459 billion (beginning impact from the Great Recession) Fiscal 2009: $1.4 trillion (Obama’s first year and in the teeth of the Recession) Fiscal 2010: $1.3 trillion Fiscal 2011: $1.3 trillion Fiscal 2012: $1.1 trillion Fiscal 2013: $680 billion Fiscal 2014: $485 billion Fiscal 2015: $438 billion Fiscal 2016: $587 billion Fiscal 2017: $666 billion (Trump’s first year of his Presidency)
Yep, asshole....Obama ran up the deficit on the heels of the lost busch years......LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!
If you actually had a brain, which I know you don't, you will note that the budgets actually rose by 3% a year while revenue crashed by millions of dollars on a yearly basis Revenue did not return to busch pre depression levels until 2012. Yeah, averages are for morons like you who can't find their own asses in the dark...
96 comments:
the overthrow of this president "trumps" everything else, including logic, reason, and the rule of law.
Hitler Trump is working well with French President Macron.
And the dnc sues trump jr for meeting with a russian lawyer that mueller hasn't thought enough of to even try to talk to.
What a jackass tom perez is.
The weaponization of the irs, fbi and doj. Obama's true legacy.
weaponization of the irs, fbi and doj. Obama's true legacy.
That is funny, ballz.....LOL
The trump legacy will be remembered as the most corrupt administration evah!!!! And just think, mueller ain't done yet and he has how many guilty pleas???? More coming!!!
You're joking right?
"Weaponization" of the IRS, FBI and DOJ is way over the edge, Lerner "targeting" notwithstanding. But they were heavily politicized at the highest levels.
One can draw a lot of parallels between this Trump administration and the Grant administration and it's not that outrageous that if this continues, Trump could eclipse Grant as presiding over the most corrupt. I think that we're a little early to predict it either way yet.
"the overthrow of this president "trumps" everything else, including logic, reason, and the rule of law."
By any means necessary.
The fruitcakes have taken over the Democrat party, we see it here every damn day.
So what are the national security implications if it's official US policy that North Korea has denuclearized, but they're actually holding on to nuclear warheads and missiles capable of delivering them? And retain stockpiles of weapons grade materials?
Trump is already claiming that NK has denuclearized, "and we didn't give anything up!"
OK I'll accept that someone might be able to express himself only as a child would, and yet be capable in other areas. There could be some lingual deficiency, or a psychological block. But even accepting that possibility, when this kind of magical thinking substitutes for concrete objectives, and it has real impact on our national defense, just how far are we willing to let it go?
One can draw a lot of parallels between this Trump administration and the Grant administration
No. One can't. This is TDS hyperbole.
I used the term weaponization purposefully. And i dont require your approval to do so.
Trump has reclassified data to top secret after they were published. Your lying and neo-Putin is making acting like the dictator he want's to be.
During the Barbra Bush funeral, he issued crazy tweets filled with lies. yet you remain on his side.
In regards to North Korea, we have two irrational actors in foreign affairs that could lead us to war.
Sean Hannity is the default President, because the President is on the phone to him several times a day.
"No. One can't. This is TDS hyperbole."
LOL.
Every damn day.
No, just a cold hearted analysis of the dysfunctional President.
the credibility of the FBI is all Trump's fault.
If your mind wasn't closed to all the contrary evidence about this President you wouldn't have lost your cedibility as a cold hearted analyst.
President Trump is the Sun to liberals.
They all revolve around him.
Anonymous Myballs said...
I used the term weaponization purposefully. And i dont require your approval to do so.
I wasn't suggesting that you needed anyone's approval. But you did ask if he was joking, and since "weaponization" is not a realistic description for most people I think it's a legitimate point to raise.
President Trump is the Sun to liberals.
They all revolve around him.
WP,great point.
"If your mind wasn't closed to all the contrary evidence about this President you wouldn't have lost your cedibility as a cold hearted analyst."
He hasn't lost any credibility.
You're in over your head again.
John F. Kerry was confirmed by the Senate in a 94–3 vote
On January 21, 2009, Clinton was confirmed in the full Senate by a vote of 94–2. Vit
You're in over your head again."Ette
Did HB file his lawsuit against CHT, or was it just crying aloud in public, again.
You might be surprised. Grant, like Trump, was elected with no clear mandate but addressing corruption ("drain the swamp") quickly became thematic. His early administration was marked by chaos, and of course with the indictments the comparison is natural.
Even though Grant ran his cabinet in military style, and Trump seeks a CEO style of management, I find parallels in temperament and style, which are interesting if they lead to the same sorts of issues.
Ooooooh...
Trump and Grant both have five letter last names with an "r" as the second letter. Coincidence? I think not.
Just saying.
"Did HB file his lawsuit against CHT, or was it just crying aloud in public, again."
No one cares.
He thinks Trump is reclassifing Comey s memos for chrissakes.
Thank you KD.
No problem.
I am in favor of the DNC suing the sitting President. Because, the defendant gets to depose ever one they want. So, depose Obama, Hillary , comey, mccabe, and a 100 others. And the millions it will drain from the DNC.
Do you think it might be said that Trump tends to extend his trust to those subordinates whose loyalty he values? Perhaps to an extent that results in his own detriment? Like President Grant ...
And in foreign policy decisions, and even in some domestic matters, Grant had the tendency to go his own way regardless of the advice of his staff ... similar to Trump. Grant had a deep, perhaps overweening, belief that his own intuition was superior to learned or experienced opinion.
Anonymous Myballs said...
I used the term weaponization purposefully.
Yeah sure....you heard that term on faux fake news....and stole it because you can't think for yourself....As for am I kidding...no, just like you using weaponization, I maintain they are the most corrupt evah....just look at fruit and his BS....the first class flights, the charter of airplanes....who spent all that money in Italy? The D's? I think not....just the tip of ice berg has been seen...Zinke is another fraud....pompeo right behind him....
"Trump and Grant both have five letter last names with an "r" as the second letter. Coincidence? I think not."
HA!
2018 Voting is not that far off.
So far the Democrats running are for Impeachment and cancel the "crumbs" and "scraps" and "apocalyptic" tax cuts.
This guy is a Hero.
James Shaw Jr., the father of a 4-year-old daughter, told a news conference flanked by Nashville Mayor David Briley and local and federal law enforcement officials that he was thinking simply of self-preservation when he wrestled the assault-style rifle away from the assailant during a rampage in which four people were killed.
"I'm not a hero, I'm just a regular person," the Nashville native said, pausing as tears rolled down his cheeks. "I just wanted to live."
Oh and he is a black man.
Anonymous wphamilton said...
So what are the national security implications if it's official US policy that North Korea has denuclearized, but they're actually holding on to nuclear warheads and missiles capable of delivering them? And retain stockpiles of weapons grade materials?
how many pallets of ca$h has trump flown into pyongyang in the middle of the night?
Trump is already claiming that NK has denuclearized, "and we didn't give anything up!"
not exactly:
White House privately skeptical of North Korea’s plans to freeze nuclear testing
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-privately-skeptical-of-north-koreas-plans-to-freeze-nuclear-testing/2018/04/21/ab64980e-4583-11e8-8569-26fda6b404c7_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.82d6b1feec65
You might be surprised. Grant, like Trump, was elected with no clear mandate
Grant won by a landslide. Taking all but 8 electoral votes and a clear majority of the popular vote.
Democrats over the weekend runaway from the "trump/russia" Collusion angle.
Is it because of the comey book was a bust, or the stormy daniels big busts?
Almost, exactly:
@realDonaldTrump
... Wow, we haven’t given up anything & they have agreed to denuclearization
Do we pretend that this doesn't happen, or do we begin to accept that the emperor has no clothes?
"... Wow, we haven’t given up anything & they have agreed to denuclearization"
LOL!
"agreed to denuclearization"
Isn't the same as...
"Trump is already claiming that NK has denuclearized"
Nice try.
"how many pallets of ca$h has trump flown into pyongyang in the middle of the night?"
Not fair!
The two-bit community organizer had better oratory skills.
Obama,
"100% of chemical weapons gone from syria"."
Wecan do this allday.
Obama,
"You will save $2,500 a year on policy premiums"
"Keep your Doctor"
Obama "There is no spying on Americans."
Oppssie.
"Wecan do this allday."
The slimeball even lied about his mother...
"his mother had to fight with health insurance companies for treatment because of a pre-existing condition."
"agreed to denuclearization"
Isn't the same as... has denuclearized
Small difference, when if they do what they've "agreed" to it won't be denuclearization. He is inventing his "reality" to suit his ego, and it's beginning to collide with our national security - and you want to quibble with how I phrased it.
But keep on pretending that the emperor is resplendently dressed. I'm just wondering how far you're willing to let it go. Evidently, Trump's not knowing or not caring what North Korea is really doing now, or has indicated that they might do, is not too far for you.
My question to you was (still is), WHEN it happens that Trump pretends that North Korea has denuclearized, and when he's made US policy to reflect that pretense, will you still think that's just fine and dandy? He has already implied that he wants to go that way.
"Small difference"
Small difference? Hardly.
" when if they do what they've "agreed" to it won't be denuclearization.""
Truly a Sherlock Holmes moment!
Like Trump says, maybe it will work, or maybe it won't. We shall see.
We shouldn't even be in THIS position.
"WHEN it happens that Trump pretends that North Korea has denuclearized, and when he's made US policy to reflect that pretense, will you still think that's just fine and dandy? He has already implied that"
He implied no such thing.
Anyway, you were fine and dandy when Obama aided Iran...AND did absolutely nothing to STOP NK.
You have a lot of nerve.
Sure he did! He's claiming that their actions and suggestions are agreeing to denuclearization. When you're already bragging about those proposed steps as "agreeing to denuclearization", you are accepting that fulfilling them are denuclearization.
You can insist that it's just a negotiation tactic if you want, and I won't argue to much, but if so he's doing it backwards. His tactic would be "you promise 'not much' and we'll basically 'give up nothing' and we'll call it denuclearization." Kiss his robes.
Good grief. Some people just can't admit that Trump might be making progress with NK. They'd rather try to frame it as dome sort of failure.
"Sure he did!"
Nonsense.
And by the way, what *I* wanted Obama to do with North Korea had *you* were tutting about me being a war-monger, about the risk I proposed. I've been consistent about it since the Bush days, so don't give me that "your were fine with it" snark.
"Some people just can't admit that Trump might be making progress with NK. They'd rather try to frame it as dome sort of failure."
TDS with a huge shot of hypocrisy.
"And by the way, what *I* wanted Obama to do with North Korea had *you* were tutting about me being a war-monger, about the risk I proposed. I've been consistent about it since the Bush days, so don't give me that "your were fine with it" snark."
You've already been caught lying.
I doubt you're telling the truth this time.
Anonymous wphamilton said...
Sure he did! He's claiming that their actions and suggestions are agreeing to denuclearization.
Well agreeing to denuclearization and actually denuclearizing are two different things.
However North Korea has announced a halt to their ICBM test and closure of their nuclear test site.
They have never gone that far with Obama, Bush or any other president.
And we are still in Korea and have not even promise them anything but a talk.
I'd say there's room for cautious optimism.
And if Trump does close a verifiable deal that denuclearized Korea you're not going to see the emperor's clothes through all that egg on your face.
I'll actually be happy to see a deal for a denuclearized Korea and I won't complain overmuch if it includes outright bribery. But I'm a realist and when something starts with bullshit, I expect more bullshit.
Then again announcing North Korea as agreed to denuclearization puts pressure on Kim to actually denuclearize.
Art of the deal.
Trump now says Kim must dismantle his nuclear arsenal before he sees any economic benefits.
So before they even sit down he has Kim taking apart his weapons.
If you want to be realistic about what North Korea HAS said, they have suspended nuclear and ballistics tests in the period of time up to the anticipated summit. He suspended tests before the Olympics also; it's not necessarily a long term proposal. We've seen this before.
And if he's dismantling nuclear sites - other than the one that's unstable and probably unusable after that last test - that's probably being pretty "creative" (Trump style "creative") with what he's calling a nuclear testing site.
CS, it's not exactly unprecedented:
1994: North Korea agreed to freeze and dismantle their nuclear reactors, ending their nuclear weapons program.
2005: North Korea agrees to give up their nuclear program. And the weapons that they claimed to have.
2007: NK agrees to close their weapons research reactor and dismantle weapons facilities
2012: North Korea agrees to a moratorium on long range missiles and their main nuclear facility.
"White House privately skeptical of North Korea’s plans to freeze nuclear testing"
Yes, and everytime North Korea had "agreed" it got sanctions lifted and US aid.
Trump's now saying they will have to do more than agree. They will actually have to follow through.
"I doubt you're telling the truth this time."
What's wrong with just acknowledging the truth, that I've held this same position for literally decades, always asking when President will stop saying "we will never tolerate a nuclear North Korea" and start actually not tolerating it? EVERY President.
To negotiate a true de-nuclearization, Trump is going to have to agree to eliminate nukes and delivery systems from South Korea, and possibly Japan. NK is also going to demand that the USA draw down or withdraw from military bases.
I certainly hope that an enforceable bilateral regime is established before Trump bargains that away.
Normally we feed and fuel the Communist NK for some so called agreement.
I have a Solution, draw a red line. "Fixed".
We now know why Democrats have decided to run from the Muller Lynch Mob, internal Democrats *only* show it as "not important".
To negotiate a true de-nuclearization, Trump is going to have to agree to eliminate nukes and delivery systems from South Korea
There are no nuclear weapons in South Korea nor are there any in Japan.
They are however, under the US nuclear umbrella.
That's non-negotiable. So is leaving South Korea.
What North Korea gets is economic aid, sanctions lifted, and participation in the global economy.
That's quite a lot.
It really is.
A fucktard mows down many, killed 9 in Toronto Canada. Shall we out law the type of van he used or blame the company that manufacturer the van?
A fucktard mows down many, killed 9 in Toronto Canada. Shall we out law the type of van he used or blame the company that manufacturer the van?
I just wonder if he spells his name Mohammed or Muhammad
We have delivery systems in both places and from time to time nuclear naval forces have docked in Japanese waters. I don't know whether any of our nuclear delivery systems have been locked and loaded in South Korea since 1991, but I suspect yes and I'm certain that this will be one of Kim Yong Un's demands. Because it frequently has been.
Whether or not "that is not an option" with Trump remains to be seen. It all remains to be seen with Trump. He's making noises that economic sanctions have brought North Korea to the bargaining table, but I very much doubt that. Yong Un thinks that he has the superior bargaining position because he believes that the world trembles at his nuclear might.
This is my opinion, obviously. I don't have any special window into his mind. But I am very confident that lifting sanctions and allowing NK to participate in the brotherhood of nations is not even a beginning.
Kim Yong Un's demands. Because it frequently has been."
I did not know that.
Alek Minassian the driver that played human bowling.
AZ Special Election, Dem wins tomorrow as a push back to Trump.
BONO's come to Jesus moment
"The Irish singer and co-founder of ONE, a campaigning group that fights poverty and disease in Africa, said it had been “a humbling thing for me” to realize the importance of capitalism and entrepreneurialism in philanthropy, particularly as someone who “got into this as a righteous anger activist with all the cliches.”
“Job creators and innovators are just the key, and aid is just a bridge,” he told an audience of 200 leading technology entrepreneurs and investors at the F.ounders tech conference in Dublin. “We see it as startup money, investment in new countries. A humbling thing was to learn the role of commerce.”
AZ Special Election, Dem wins tomorrow as a push back to Trump.
Another great troll from the freemartin lover.....idiot, you think you are the only one who pays attention to the news???? asshole
Poll Results Spread
Arizona 8th District Special Election - Lesko vs. Tipirneni Emerson Lesko 49, Tipirneni 43 Lesko +6
Yep, the troll embarrasses himself again with another stupid post....what he does best! LOLOLOLOL
BONO's come to Jesus moment
Too bad the bible thumping trump supporters don't have the same revelation as Bono....maybe you should follow his example and cut down another tree for Jesus....LOL
I wonder why your massive carbon print keeps getting larger.
Just saw preliminary deficit numbers for the next fiscal year....Good going R's and congress....$1 trillion is right around the corner!!! Yep, the end is near for you Jesus loving wood burning polluting hypocrites....LOLOLOLOL
Why? With the Democrats hating on Trump how can a Democrat be losing?
AZ seems like a lock for the vote Dem, Impeach Trump 2018 all ya got message.
$ 1 Trillion. Ok
Obama for 8 years averaged $1.65 Trillion a year.
Obama for 8 years averaged $1.65 Trillion a year.
How soon you conveniently forget that the busch recession and imfunded wars drove those numbers...But why let a fact get in the way of your idiotic opinion,....thansx for p[laying..... asshole...
AZ seems like a lock for the vote Dem,
no it doesn't asshole....
I know you are not smart enough to think of that, but another nice try....
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2018/01/15/obamas-federal-debt-grew-at-a-slower-rate-than-reagan-h-w-bush-or-w-bush/#1cd35adb1917
Impact from the Great Recession
According to the U.S National Bureau of Economic Research, the Great Recession started in December 2007 and ended in June 2009. President Barack Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009, so it had already started before he entered office.
The first thing you notice when looking at the federal deficits from fiscal 2007 (the U.S. government fiscal year ends in September) is that it increased by almost $1 trillion from fiscal 2008 (two months before Obama was elected and four months before he was sworn in) to fiscal 2009. It remained over $1 trillion per year for four years and got below Bush’s last years deficit in fiscal 2015. It continued to decrease until Obama’s last year and has increased in Trump’s first year in office.
The McCabe probe is exposing the justice dept for trying to shut down the hillary investigation by the fbi.
The obama administration will go down as the most corrupt in history.
Fatty, have you had your heavy food miles breakfast?
Trump $1 Trillion deficit
Obama $1.65 Trillion deficit
Fatty McLardass has no idea of reality.
Lost years
"The McCabe probe is exposing the justice dept for trying to shut down the hillary investigation by the fbi.
The obama administration will go down as the most corrupt in history." MB
Yep.
Reports note that the three faces of Hillary/Obama/Comey are in stark conflict with the Truth.
DNC Lawsuit = RNC motions for discovery.
"The McCabe probe is exposing the justice dept for trying to shut down the hillary investigation by the fbi."
We can only hope it is so. But Coldheart thinks that American people are hankering to hang McCabe for denying that he was the leak, and that they don't care what he was exposing.
So if he's right, the McCabe probe will not expose anything; it will squash it and future leaks by dealing harshly with him. There won't be a whiff of the DOJ corruption, just exaggerated accusations regarding McCabe and only McCabe. But since he's already been fired, I think they'll just bury it. If he IS charged, it will be mainly because he back-stabbed his boss to further his own personal advancement.
I see your stupid pills are working just fine, idiot.....
Trump $1 Trillion deficit
Obama $1.65 Trillion deficit
Fiscal 2008: $459 billion (beginning impact from the Great Recession)
Fiscal 2009: $1.4 trillion (Obama’s first year and in the teeth of the Recession)
Fiscal 2010: $1.3 trillion
Fiscal 2011: $1.3 trillion
Fiscal 2012: $1.1 trillion
Fiscal 2013: $680 billion
Fiscal 2014: $485 billion
Fiscal 2015: $438 billion
Fiscal 2016: $587 billion
Fiscal 2017: $666 billion (Trump’s first year of his Presidency)
Yep, asshole....Obama ran up the deficit on the heels of the lost busch years......LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!
If you actually had a brain, which I know you don't, you will note that the budgets actually rose by 3% a year while revenue crashed by millions of dollars on a yearly basis Revenue did not return to busch pre depression levels until 2012. Yeah, averages are for morons like you who can't find their own asses in the dark...
depression levels "
Fatty, feel free to write even more on all topics economic. Ty.
100% True for Trump.
Post a Comment