So as soon as it was released that Donald Trump was not considered a target in the Mueller special probe, about a million and one liberal pundits (all but a couple without any legal background) suggested that it didn't mean anything because the President cannot be "indicted".
The problem with that suggestion is that an "indictment" is simply a consequence of being a "target". It really has nothing to do with the legal definition. The DOJ has specific definitions of what a target is and what a subject is. Whether or not an indictment will follow isn't within the scope of that definition.
By the guidelines of a federal investigation, if the investigation has uncovered evidence that makes investigators or a Grand Jury feel a particular person has committed a criminal action, then that person becomes a target. A criminal case is likely being made. The criminal complaint might be taking form. Evidence is being analyzed. Yes, a target should definitely worry about the possibility of an indictment, but it doesn't follow that every target requires an indictment to be considered a target..
So just because the President cannot be indicted (according to most experts), that doesn't mean that Special Counsel would not be obligated to still treat that person as if they have committed a criminal action. It would still require the investigator to put the criminal action into a report. It would still require them to build the criminal case. It would still require them to gather and analyze the evidence of said criminal action. They would still be treated as if they were a target.
This is what Ken Starr did when he provided a report stating the specific criminal acts that he believed President Clinton committed. It read pretty much like an indictment might read. It highlighted the laws that were broken, and the evidence of said criminal actions. I am sure if you asked Ken Starr, he would not have told Clinton and his attorneys that he was just a "subject" of the investigation. At least not if Ken Starr was following DOJ guidelines.
203 comments:
1 – 200 of 203 Newer› Newest»it didn't mean anything because the President cannot be "indicted".
But he certainly can be impeached.....
What a difference a day makes for menstral and his optimism.....LOL
President Trump Job Approval Rasmussen Reports Approve 47, Disapprove 51 Disapprove +4
Wonder what tomorrow's will bring with all the stupidity going on....
it didn't mean anything because the President cannot be "indicted".
It's almost as if you didn't read the post.
"If @realDonaldTrump asks me to deploy Oregon Guard troops to the Mexico border, I’ll say no," tweeted Democratic Gov Brown."
Klienminded ODopie
Oregon, not Moonbeam troops
Facebook shooting was a muslim, was a female.
Was not an NRA member.
"Oregon"
She's just being a drama queen.
Everytime Gov Moonbeam needed 10's of Billion dollars to hide his mismanagement of his state"s money.
President Trump bailed him out.
I think that Investigations operate according to the resolutions that are possible for the investigation.
To whatever extent that Mueller is looking into Trump (and he's playing that close to the vest), it is unlikely that not characterizing him as a criminal target means Trump isn't being investigated for offenses which may or may not be deemed by Congress to be serious enough for impeachment.
Huh?
Sharyl Attkisson
✔
@SharylAttkisson
4 Apr
Re: Trump interview w/special counsel, perhaps all can agree it should be under same terms @TheJusticeDept gave Hillary Clinton:
1. An exoneration letter is drafted in advance.
2. Immunity is given to top Trump aides (and they’re allowed to sit in on interview). (Continued)
Sharyl Attkisson
✔
@SharylAttkisson
3. Interview isn’t recorded.
4. Lead official (Mueller) doesn’t attend.
5. #2 official’s family has received large donations from Trump political friends.
6. Prior to the interview, lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump's wife (to discuss grandchildren). (Cont)
12:40 PM - Apr 4, 2018
WP...
You do realize that unless Mueller finds specific evidence of an illegal conspiracy between Trump and the Russians, that his findings will not matter one iota as it pertains to impeachment.
The most likely offense that Mueller is apparently attempting to pin on Trump is some sort of obstruction charge, or possibly hoping to trap into some sort of false statement charge.
But you can rest assured that there are enough conservative legal experts who will scoff at anything like that. There are plenty of GOP members of congress who have law degrees (or don't) and have already made up the determination that firing Comey was not obstruction, and anything short of a signed confession by the President suggesting that he intended to obstruct justice will fall short.
As you pointed out. Mueller isn't likely to "indict" the President, meaning all he can do is offer a report. Anything that he offers that is considered "subjective" and it will be discounted as just another opinion (because that is all it is).
If he finds "tangible" evidence, such as destruction of evidence, tangibly coercing witnesses, or something up that alley... some tangible action that he was able to dig up from his investigation... then I think he might have a chance at changing some minds.
But otherwise, if it's some hypothetical or opinion about what could constitute obstruction, then he's just another legal guy with an opinion.
That will especially hold true if he attempts to accuse the President of a crime for actions that have never previously been charged or prosecuted (such as firing an FBI director).
t's almost as if you didn't read the post.\
I rarely read your drivel CH.....too tedious and your bias is always present....but it's nice that you read my BS with such aplomb. LOL
Was not an NRA member.
SO WHAT!!!!!!!
A great source rat....
Attkisson has reached fourth-degree black belt in taekwondo. And a degree in journalism from Florida.....works for Sinclair broadcasting.....wonder what side she is biased on? Her tweets are a joke, just like you!!
Imagine this, the control freak donnie denies another whopper....
Trump says he didn’t know his attorney paid $130,000 to porn star Stormy Daniels
The president also said he didn’t know where his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, got the money for the payment to Daniels, who says she was paid to keep quiet about her affair with Trump.
The next fraud to bite the dust...
The main defenses of Pruitt’s questionable condo lease are crumbling
Making matters worse, the White House doesn’t quite sound firmly committed to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt.
Most corrupt administration eval!!!!!!!!
Wonder about his first class travel exploits and the 30 man security squad we are paying for....For an EPA director....he's stupid on top of being corrupt.....
Your post was very fair and helpful. But the response to wo was some of your imagination. Lol
Off topic.
MSNBC is the only cable news network to have seen a year-over-year growth in ratings in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the first quarter of 2017. By comparison, both CNN and Fox News saw ratings decline in that period.
Nevertheless, Fox News still came in as the top-rated cable news network overall in the first quarter of 2018, averaging 2,479,000 viewers overall and 494,000 in the 25-54 demographic in primetime.
Still, MSNBC's prime-time lineup ratings are up 8 percent from 2017, while Fox News is down 18 percent and CNN is down 16 percent, according to Forbes.
Another one in love with power??? How much longer will this guy last?????
WASHINGTON — At least five officials at the Environmental Protection Agency, four of them high-ranking, were reassigned or demoted, or requested new jobs in the past year after they raised concerns about the spending and management of the agency’s administrator, Scott Pruitt.
The concerns included unusually large spending on office furniture and first-class travel, as well as certain demands by Mr. Pruitt for security coverage, such as requests for a bulletproof vehicle and an expanded 20-person protective detail, according to people who worked for or with the E.P.A. and have direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/05/business/epa-officials-questioned-scott-pruitt.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Lol, rolling, rolling, rolling back the lost years.
Klienminded here ya go.
"Oct 1, 2015 · Confronted with our data analysis and hard questions from the Washington Times, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tries to justify $92 million in mostly upscale furniture ...."
Dennis is outraged
So Much Winning
The new NAFTA will come out or the end of it entirely.
Oh so funny
Dem. Senator Harris, about killing the President and other Republicans.
Ellen DeGeneres asked, “If you had to be stuck on an elevator with either President Trump, Mike Pence, or Jeff Sessions, who would it be?”
Harris quipped, “Does one of us have to come out alive?”
Maybe the Republican Party should investigate why Trump is attacking American business and American consumers and calling for more taxes on Amazon and its customers to punish success and efficiency.
But they won't, because the Republicans are the far-left party now.
It’s a difficult time for those of us committed to tolerance, democracy and the pursuit of peace, both in Israel and here at home.
Last Friday, as many of us were getting ready for Passover with our families, we learned of the deeply disturbing violence on the Gaza border, in which 17 Palestinians were killed and hundreds wounded by Israeli forces.
On Tuesday, we felt a few brief hours of excitement on learning that the Israeli government had agreed with the United Nations not to deport tens of thousands of African migrants.
Then hope turned to outrage when Prime Minister Netanyahu reversed his own decision in the face of intense right-wing pressure. Announcing that the agreement had been canceled, Netanyahu then shamefully attacked and blamed our allies at the New Israel Fund instead of owning up to his own cowardice.
Meanwhile, here at home, we’ve seen our own president go on a Fox News-induced Twitter rampage against Central American refugees, while threatening to put the military on the border with Mexico.
Some -- unsure whether to scream in rage or cry in despair -- might be tempted to give in to feelings of frustration and powerlessness.
We’re definitely all asking the same question: “What Can I Do?”
Our answer, as J Street and as pro-Israel, pro-peace Americans, is that we plan to reverse the course we’re on by bringing about political change -- starting at the polls this November.
Right now in Washington, we’re faced with a dangerous administration that cuts humanitarian relief to Gazans as a punishment and does nothing advance a two-state solution or support Israeli democracy.
Alarmingly, the president is now surrounding himself with a “war cabinet” of extreme right wingers determined to tear up the Iran nuclear agreement and push our country and Israel towards new conflict in the Middle East.
This failure of American leadership must not and cannot last forever. We can’t let it.
In the vitally important 2018 midterm elections, we can elect a Congress that will counter the White House’s most reckless policies, promote diplomacy toward a two-state solution and block the march to war.
That’s why, over the next seven months, I hope you will join J Street in doing everything we can to help an impressive array of candidates take back Congress from Trump’s enablers and allies.
We need you to contribute your time, resources and passion to help our supported candidates win across the country in November.
And even as we gear up for an intense election season, we’ll also be making our voices heard by those already serving in Washington.
As thousands of J Street supporters gather in DC for our National Conference and Advocacy Day this month, we’ll head to Capitol Hill and urge our representatives to stand up for the Iran nuclear deal, promote the two-state solution and reject the extremist doctrines of John Bolton by refusing to confirm his ally, Mike Pompeo, as Secretary of State.
On Advocacy Day and in the months ahead, we’ll make clear to Congress that we need American leadership that eases conflict and suffering, instead of exacerbating it. When it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, we need policies that empower moderates, advance the two-state solution and oppose the occupation.
We know that change won’t come quickly -- and that in the meantime, we’ll face many more painful moments and challenges.
But we also know that the hard work of campaigning, fundraising and getting out the vote pays off. We know that every constituent meeting and call to a member of Congress helps make a difference.
Transforming our politics and the face of US leadership is our answer to the question, “What Can I Do.” That’s the way we are going to get this country back on track, help bring about a better future for Israelis and Palestinians and create a safer, more just and more peaceful world.
Thank you,
Jeremy Ben-Ami
President, J Street
Fatty in Cabos and you're here trolling.
Sales rules, loser!
http://www.secretsresorts.com/en_us/resorts/mexico/puerto-los-cabos.html
LMAO
"Thank you,
Jeremy Ben-Ami
President, J Street"
Go fuck yourself Boswell, you anti-Semitic piece of shit.
Snow and 17 degrees.
GW MY ass
GW MY ass
Yep, it is sure interesting weather you are having!!!!!
Anonymous caliphate4vr said...
Fatty in Cabos
No mutton breath, I'm at my Georgia cabin and you are still working as a loser salesman..... Too funny even for you!!!!
Dennis is outraged
And rightfully so.....asshole
Every Prediction by the ALT Left Liberal Dem here about President Trump has been wrong.
I'm at my Georgia cabin"
Rented, don't act like you have any wealth, you don't own it.
ALT Left Liberal Dem here about
REALLY?????? Millions and millions of illegal votes? Rapes in numbers no one has ever seen before? Pruitt doing a great job? Knew nothing about payment to a his whore????? Going to be an interesting day. LOL
Rented, don't act like you have any wealth
Owned, just like my floriduh residence.....asshole. You are the fraud with your inherited dirt farm that is worthless as a freemartin calf......idiot
Blogger C.H. Truth said...
WP...
You do realize that unless Mueller finds specific evidence of an illegal conspiracy between Trump and the Russians, that his findings will not matter one iota as it pertains to impeachment.
There are two things wrong with that. One, impeachment for obstruction of justice is why Nixon resign, and the charge against Clinton, so regardless of what conservative Republicans in Congress have already decided, that's going to matter. And it doesn't have to be (can't be, if he finds obstruction) so narrowly devoted to the Comey firing either.
Secondly, beyond obstruction, if he finds anything that you'd consider high crimes then that will do just as well as conspiracy IMO.
Of course I realize where you're going with that. You want to narrowly restrict the possible outcomes to very specific requirements that you believe are extremely unlikely to be met. It makes good coffe-house arguments. But the fact is, as we've already seen in this investigation, Mueller is digging and whatever he finds will be part of it. Then it's up to Congress, and it may not be as strongly pro-Trump as you believe.
Owned, just like my floriduh residence"
Poor Klienbrained,,,, you don't own either, you rent both.
You really can't in your tiny IQ brain think we believe you.
A couple of inconvenient facts.
1. Nixon was never impeached. The whole process stop when he resigned.
2. Despite clear cut evidence that Clinton did indeed committed perjury and obstruction of justice it wasn't enough to convict him and remove him from office.
In both cases neither one faced criminal indictment.
Klienbrained is HB, they are both forgetful and make shit up all the time.
"commie said...
And yet you own no real property.
You really can't own property, only rent."
Yet today, KlienBrained said " Owned, just like my floriduh residence"
Owned, just like my floriduh residence.....asshole.
He still has to pay rent on the trailer park lots his double-wide sits on.
He still has to pay rent on the trailer park lots his double-wide sits on.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! About as humorous as your hatred of gays and women....
Ooooooo!!! He shoots!!! he scores!!!
Like HB, every liberal here will post one thing one day then forget their story and post something different the next.
HB said he "owned" the home in CA.
Someone provided his address, so I went to the public open records of the lame State of CA and looked it up. His so called wife owns it, his name is not on the deed. And at that she co - owns it , no, not with ALKY, but with the bank.
At their advanced age you would think giving he is the greatest man on earth they would own it.
He called for the US Stock Market Crash on election morning, now again on April the 1st. Yet, he has been wrong.
HB said he "owned" the home in CA.
And you were given dirt in Kansas....given your advanced dementia, your comment borders on complete jealousy since you have no visible means of support except what the govmt gives you...
Ooooooo!!! He shoots!!! he scores!!!
Yep, crammed it up your ass again, soooooo easy....
OOOOOOPS!!!!
The March jobs report is out and it’s a miss.
In March, the economy added 103,000 jobs while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.1% for the sixth-straight month, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Markets crashing with trade war threat and now this....wonder when KD will come out and tell us how great donnie the jerk is doing.!!!!!!
"Blogger Commonsense said...A couple of inconvenient facts.1. Nixon was never impeached. The whole process stop when he resigned."
How is that inconvenient for me, when I wrote "is why Nixon resigned"?
2. Despite clear cut evidence that Clinton did indeed committed perjury and obstruction of justice it wasn't enough to convict him and remove him from office.
... and I wrote , "the charge against Clinton".
Usually, when you write "inconvenient facts" for someone, you'd want to present something other than what he already presented ... otherwise you come off looking foolish ...
You don't say why you imagine those points to be significant, so I won't speculate on what's going on in your mind. The salient point however is that Trump could well face charges of Obstruction, as have two Presidents before him. Coldheart's declaration that Trump's only problem is if Mueller finds that Trump conspired with Russia is refuted by the precedent of Nixon and Clinton, as you yourself confirm here.
Market crashing??
Ytd dow down 0.29%, nasdaq up 2.50%
4.1% unemployment is also a positive level.
The only thing crashing is dopie coming off the drugs.
The salient point however is that Trump could well face charges of Obstruction
i don't think so. i think at this point mueller is faced with playing the same game you've been playing for months now - one of semantics.
his best bet is to capture trump neglecting to verbally dot an i or cross a t, resulting in some bullshit process crime like lying to the FBI. which, when you think about it is the ultimate irony since the genesis of this entire situation is based upon an FBI-created lie.
Mueller so far has not revealed any convincing evidence that Obstruction of Justice has occurred.
Firing the FBI director per se is not obstruction and there is no evidence that Trump tampered with witnesses or in any way impaired with the investigation of the special counsel.
(There is however, widespread evidence of abuse of the FISA law by the FBI.)
So the point WP is that unless you have that evidence, there is no impeachable charge that you can credibility bring against the president and you're talking out your ass.
HB, why has trump not used nukes as you assured us he would by now?
Koch Network Grows Impatient with Republicans
James Hohmann: “Leaders of the conservative Koch political network are mad about President Trump’s tariffs, the failure to protect ‘dreamers’ and runaway government spending. They’re frustrated congressional leaders do not feel a greater sense of urgency to pass more ambitious legislation during what could be the final six months of unified Republican control for a long time. And they’re worried that squabbling might derail their efforts to roll back financial regulations, expand access to experimental medicines and overhaul the criminal justice system.”
“For now, the network led by billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch still plans to spend between $300 million to $400 million on politics and policy during the 2018 cycle. But they’re growing impatient, rethinking their approach and signaling a willingness to work more closely with Democrats on areas of common ground.”
____________
Evangelicals Will Meet With Trump as Sex Scandals Swirl
Several Evangelical Christian leaders are planning a sit-down with President Trump in June over allegations that his lawyer paid an adult film star $130,000 for her silence about an alleged affair, NPR reports.
Said the leader of one ministry: “We’re very concerned… There’s things that are like fingernails on the chalkboard to people of faith. That’s not who we are; that’s not a ‘fruit of the Spirit’; that’s not leading with humility.”
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile and admits it.
Never said that and never would. Another of
"Loretta Russo's" lies.
By the way, would you like to know where she lives?
James Boswell of Normal, Illinois is a pedophile and admits it.
103,000 new jobs. Cool
That number is better then 29 Months during the Lost Years.
"That said, white evangelicals overwhelmingly favor Republican candidates at the polls. Whatever their misgivings, 81 percent of self-identified white evangelicals voted for Trump in the November 2016 election. Recent polls suggest a majority still back Trump despite the Daniels allegations, though his popularity with the group took a dip when the news initially broke."
Liberals will never get the support of real Christians.
Liberals will never get the support of real Christians.
You mean the christians that support infidelity and a whore monger? Those christians.....who the hell wants them, they are as big a pig as donnie....
Liberals how in Mary Jo
Kopechne ?
After honesty letting "The Lion of the Senate" live a full happy, wealthy life.
That number is better then 29 Months during the Lost Years.
Wow....what about the rest of those months? What about January to August of 2009 when the Busch recession was roaring.....You really are an idiot!!!!!
Kopechne ?
I was wondering when the first idiot would chime in with that....Not disappointed and so predictable from the fraud of Kansas.,,,,,
You mean the christians that support infidelity and a whore monger?
Jfk
Clinton
K
You forgot LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL, Dennis sweetie.
"Jfk
Clinton"
Abortion.
There's actually a Chicago rrporter complaining that the first lady isnt doing her job. Lol. The liberal media has lost their marbles.
i don't think so. i think at this point mueller is faced with playing the same game you've been playing for months now - one of semantics.
------------------------------
It may seem like it when I write about the statutes, the way courts have used them, and what's going on in the investigation, but that's just the way law is. It's not semantics. When the elements of the statutes are well defined, we must understand precisely what they're referring to. When they aren't, when the courts look to standards such as legislative intent, or various "reasonable" type standards, that might also seem nitpicky but it's really not and can be fairly objective, believe it or not.
Whether Mueller has, right now, any solid evidence against Trump for obstruction is beside the point that if he DOES have evidence, a good case, then that alone would spell trouble for him. I don't know his case nor all the evidence he has; I have said that from the very start, and have never wavered from that. BUT, I can tell you what the law says about it, try to dispel the misconceptions and errors in reasoning, and it's nothing at all like semantics.
You don't like it, or you disagree, that's fine. But everything I've written is sound and legally correct, and I will stand by it.
"Liberals will never get the support of real Christians."
You say Real Christians™ base their religion on politics? Because, you imply, that "Liberalism" would be contrary to their religion, and "liberal" is strictly a political term as you apply it here.
Interesting perspective ... I'd seen elements of that from the article-of-faith flavor of some of those defenses of Trump, but I'd never seen someone making an indirect admission of it like this.
Job growth is like the magic Negro
The March jobs report is out and it’s a miss.
In March, the economy added 103,000 jobs while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.1% for the sixth-straight month, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"You say Real Christians™ base their religion on politics"
Based on Scripture. The same Scripture liberals bastardize.
The real Christians pray for him. They know he's not perfect, but they trust that he has asked for forgiveness...
Whether Mueller has, right now, any solid evidence against Trump for obstruction is beside the point
Beside the point? If he DOES have evidence?
After 14 months I am so fucking tired of hearing "If he has evidence" of "maybe Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, etc, etc and "more to come" .
It's time to put up or shut up.
"We certainly don't hold him up as the pastor of this nation and he is not," Graham said. "But I appreciate the fact that the president does have a concern for Christian values, he does have a concern to protect Christians whether it's here at home or around the world and I appreciate the fact that he protects religious liberty and freedom."
Franklin Graham, a real Christian.
Plus, real Christians support Israel, as does Trump.
real Christians support Israel
Are these the same christians that advocate wife cheating and women beating?????
Franklin Graham, a real Christian.
Is nothing like his old man....Franklyn is a fraud..
After 14 months I am so fucking tired of hearing
About Benghazi?????
fk
Clinton
Didn't support either....asshole....But you imply real christians would.....
"I believe at 70 years of age the president is a much different person today than he was four years ago, five years ago, 10 years ago,” Graham said. “He is not President Perfect.”
Franklin Graham, a real Christian.
Moochelle Obimbo found out who her daddy is. It is pres. Trump.
The Magic Negro and I'll health Hillary are proven wrong again with today's job numbers.
Mining showed a very strong gain in JOBS.
Aww wittle hb is attempting to talk econimcs. How cute.
4.1 % unemployment.
The Magic Negro never did that, not once during the Lost years.
AOL Report: Trump asked CIA why it waited for a target to walk away from his family before striking
Anonymous Indy Voter said...
AOL Report: Trump asked CIA why it waited for a target to walk away from his family before striking
an excellent question, and one i also would've asked.
trump could be assuming, as many would, that the apple didn't fall too far from the tree.
of course, context is helpful...
Trump urged the CIA to start arming its drones in Syria. “If you can do it in 10 days, get it done,” he said, according to two former officials familiar with the meeting.
Later, when the agency’s head of drone operations explained that the CIA had developed special munitions to limit civilian casualties, the president seemed unimpressed. Watching a previously recorded strike in which the agency held off on firing until the target had wandered away from a house with his family inside, Trump asked, “Why did you wait?” one participant in the meeting recalled.
On the campaign trail, Trump often said he would “take out” the families of terrorists.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/for-trump-and-his-generals-victory-has-different-meanings/2018/04/05/8d74eab0-381d-11e8-9c0a-85d477d9a226_story.html?utm_term=.975fba7f3963
take out the families of terrorists. what a novel idea. prevent them from producing some retaliatory heirs.
good catch "indy."
Refreshing that the President "owns" being a sociopath isn't it, rather than hiding behind a facade of "family values".
Is it "Liberal" to risk letting him walk away rather than killing the children? Where do Real Christians™ fall on that question?
Opie pays rent on his home and cabin.
Where do Real Christians™ fall on that question?
what do "real christians" have to do with it in the first place?
wp's strawman emporium must be open for business.
Anonymous wphamilton said...
Refreshing that the President "owns" being a sociopath isn't it, rather than hiding behind a facade of "family values".
isn't it? the last guy went so far as to vaporize US citizens. trump hasn't gone THERE yet as far as i know.
Blogger rrb said...what do "real christians" have to do with it in the first place ...wp's strawman emporium must be open for business.
Ask this gal:
"Blogger Loretta said...
Liberals will never get the support of real Christians.
April 6, 2018 at 10:15 AM"
Don't you get tired being wrong every time you a smart-ass zinger?
isn't it? the last guy went so far as to vaporize US citizens.
Yeah, if the last guy tried to vaporize citizens, Trump being a sociopath is no big deal. I'm not sure what you're referring to, but it's as good as any reason to keep the faith.
KD the flaming idiot posts another round of stupid with...
Opie pays rent on his home and cabin.\
What ever you say dumb freemartin breeder.... There's an old saying about arguing with an idiot......You win this round, scum bucket....
The numbnutz of Kansas continues his exhibition of outright stupidity with
4.1 % unemployment.
The Magic Negro never did that, not once during the Lost years.
Hey jag off.....Obama decreased the unemployment rate by 50%, something trump will never do unless they change how they count!!!!
Don't you get tired being wrong every time you a smart-ass zinger?
not at all, especially since she's right. liberals would like to equate christians with damned fools. that's simply not the case. christians are charitable and forgiving, but not stupid.
fwiw, it was BHO who droned a US citizen in yemen. no due process, just death from the sky. a righteous kill i might add. but i'm not the hypocrite in this case. BHO is.
wp, it can be a real christian, a christian like secretary mattis for example, who might think it wise from a strategic perspective to flatten that mud hut and everyone in it. terrorist muslims didn't fall out of the sky as full grown radical murderers. they were born, raised, radicalized and then went on to a life of murder and mayhem, all in the name of islam and often in the name of their family.
for perspective, la cosa nostra in sicily was known for killing entire bloodlines just so an infant today did not seek revenge tomorrow. that could be what trump is considering, it's what i would consider. and i'm a christian. but not a damned fool.
Another day, another group of shitty poll numbers.....seems even Rassmussen is seeing the light!!!
President Trump Job Approval Rasmussen Reports Approve 47, Disapprove 52 Disapprove +5
President Trump Job Approval Reuters/Ipsos Approve 41, Disapprove 56 Disapprove +15
President Trump Job Approval Economist/YouGov Approve 41, Disapprove 55 Disapprove +14
2018 Generic Congressional Vote Economist/YouGov Democrats 43, Republicans 36 Democrats +7
2018 Generic Congressional Vote Reuters/Ipsos Democrats 43, Republicans 34 Democrats +9
Ask this gal:
"Blogger Loretta said...
Liberals will never get the support of real Christians.
April 6, 2018 at 10:15 AM"
and btw, for what that's worth...
liberals are, at their core, sinister and disingenuous. they would only seek the support of christians - real or otherwise - for the length of time it takes one to cast a ballot in a voting booth. other than that they wouldn't piss on a christian if he or she were on fire.
Moochelle Obimbo found out who her daddy is. It is Pres. Trump.
especially since she's right.
She's an asshole just like you!!! She thinks a womanizing whore monger is worthy of sitting in the Oval Orafice, the same office she bitched and moaned about when Clinton got his blow job.....Mattis lives his life as a military man and has a brain...unlike you and the bitch of Kansas...Being a military man and a christian are not mutually exclusive...trump is just a pig and is treating the country like he owns the place.....
Klienminded, your understanding of Econimcs is less then HB's and Jane's, which is below a rock's.
Cnn called it "Legendary sex life".
Cool
President Trump is treating the country like he owns the place"
Well, "this land is my land".
You rent, never have owned land or a home. Like HB.
First Hooker Moochelle Obama, thought she was your mommie and The Magic Negro was your Daddy.
Making you a child. That says a lot about what they thought of you.
Going down in the Elevator, Democratic Senator Kamala Harris is giving free blow jobs. She likes Men in power.
You rent, never have owned land or a home. Like HB.
And you do???? BWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
Again, arguing with an idiot like you, it is difficult for others to discern what is real. You continue to win the game of made up shit. if you posting this drivel makes you feel big like trump, please continue on with your freemartin wife.....you ain't worth the ether of this post...ESAD asshole
Yep, clear deeds to my home place and other lands. In a trust.
All toll the trust hold just short of a section.
Klienbrained is HB, they are both forgetful and make shit up all the time.
"commie said...
And yet you own no real property.
You really can't own property, only rent."
Yet today, KlienBrained said " Owned, just like my floriduh residence"
Yep, clear deeds to my home place and other lands. In a trust.
Liar and fraud....you have no such thing....
BTW, I still maintain you can never really own property....just the right to use it....Want to keep this up asshole?
You have so many versions of your life story. I am good with all of them, as you are.
by NEIL MUNRO
6 Apr 2018
804
Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ immigration courts have returned deportation orders back up to the rate that existed before former President Barack Obama’s pro-migration policies.
But the backlogs created by Obama’s pro-migrant policies are still keeping hundreds of thousands of Central Americans in U.S. jobs, and are still inviting many additional poor Central American migrants to ask for asylum at border posts in Texas and California.
Mother Jones.
Obama Killed a 16-Year-Old American in Yemen. Trump Just Killed His 8-Year-Old Sister.
IN 2010, PRESIDENT Obama directed the CIA to assassinate an American citizen in Yemen, Anwar al-Awlaki, despite the fact that he had never been charged with (let alone convicted of) any crime, and the agency successfully carried out that order a year later with a September 2011 drone strike. While that assassination created widespread debate — the once-again-beloved ACLU sued Obama to restrain him from the assassination on the ground of due process and then, when that suit was dismissed, sued Obama again after the killing was carried out — another drone killing carried out shortly thereafter was perhaps even more significant yet generated relatively little attention. after the killing of Awlaki, a separate CIA drone strike in Yemen killed his 16-year-old American-born son, Abdulrahman, along with the boy’s 17-year-old cousin and several other innocent Yemenis. The U.S. eventually claimed that the boy was not their target but merely “collateral damage.” Abdulrahman’s grief-stricken grandfather, Nasser al-Awlaki, urged the Washington Post “to visit a Facebook memorial page for Abdulrahman,” which explained: “Look at his pictures, his friends, and his hobbies. His Facebook page shows a typical kid.”
Unemployment Rate
Obama Takes office Jan. 09 rate = 7.8%
Obama leaves office Jan.17 rate = 4.8%
"Hey jag off.....Obama decreased the unemployment rate by 50%" he earns his Dopie badge Daily.
Interesting. Someone posted, pretending to be me, at 1:30.
Not surprising, given the low level of maturity of most of the posters here.
"liberals are, at their core, sinister and disingenuous. they would only seek the support of christians - real or otherwise - for the length of time it takes one to cast a ballot in a voting booth. other than that they wouldn't piss on a christian if he or she were on fire."
Bingo.
Oh look fatty spent another entire day here trolling. I guess when you're a loser with plastic hips thanks to morbid obesity your options are limited.
Back to walk the beach on Cabo
LMAO
Indy VoterApril 6, 2018 at 1:30 PM
AOL Report: Trump asked CIA why it waited for a target to walk away from his family before striking.
This was not Indy???
Cali, a few days ago fatty said he did not own property, today he does, old and stupid.
What is 50% of 7.8 %?
The answer eluded fatty.
Franklin Graham is a piece of trash, a lifelong freeloader who would be just another nut if it wasn't for his daddy's coattails and his new political sugar daddy Trump.
"As part of the memo, Trump asked Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to produce a list of military facilities that could be used to detain illegal immigrants."
More shameful waste and weakening of our military from the draft-dodger in chief.
Not only are the border Nazis left-wing social engineers, they want to militarize their social engineering fever dreams.
"Back to walk the beach on Cabo"
Have fun Cali!
Have fun Cali!
Awesome day. Laughing my ass off at midwesterners and northeast folks that get out into the sun for the first time in months and are burnt to a crisp.
I got down to the infinity pool at 10 left at 1:30
They look like lobsters and I can go back mañana
You got caught in a trap.
Indy didn't write the post
Kput'z said that he inherited his ranch. He never bought land.
Hi in PNC.
Good to see Pres. Trump, hammering Putin and his buddies.
Blogger rrb said...
liberals are, at their core, sinister and disingenuous. they would ... other than that they wouldn't piss on a christian if he or she were on fire."
Wow, could you have changed your story any more from "what do "real christians" have to do with is" and "wp's strawman emporium"?
As soon as you see how wrong mocking me for bringing it up was, you're all in on it. LOL, and you talk about hypocrisy.
As far as your opinion goes, it's hard to think of any less-Christian attitude than what you've expressed here.
Fake News
Secret, direct talks underway between US and North Korea
By Elise Labott, Kevin Liptak and Jenna McLaughlin, CNN
Updated Apr 7, 2018
Washington (CNN) - The United States and North Korea have been holding secret, direct talks to prepare for a summit between President Donald Trump and North Korea leader Kim Jong Un, a sign that planning for the highly anticipated meeting is progressing, several administration officials familiar with the discussions tell CNN.
Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo and a team at the CIA have been working through intelligence back-channels to make preparations for the summit, the officials said. American and North Korean intelligence officials have spoken several times and have even met in a third country, with a focus on nailing down a location for the talks.
Although the North Korean regime has not publicly declared its invitation by Kim Jong Un to meet with Trump, which was conveyed last month by a South Korean envoy, several officials say North Korea has since acknowledged Trump's acceptance, and Pyongyang has reaffirmed Kim is willing to discuss the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
The North Koreans are pushing to have the meeting in their capital, Pyongyang, the sources said, although it is unclear whether the White House would be willing to hold the talks there. The Mongolian capital Ulaanbaatar has also been raised as a possible location, the sources said.
The talks between intelligence officials are laying the groundwork for a meeting between Pompeo and his North Korea counterpart, the head of the Reconnaissance General Bureau, in advance of the leaders' summit. Once a location is agreed upon the officials said that the date will be set and the agenda discussed in greater detail.
Officials said the decision to use the already existing intelligence channel was more a facet of Pompeo's current status as CIA director as he awaits confirmation as secretary of state than a reflection of the content of the discussions. Pompeo is expected to begin the process of Senate confirmation in the next several weeks.
One of Trump's most trusted national security advisers, Pompeo has led efforts to prepare for the summit, which Trump has pressed his aides to organize. If he confirmed, he will assume oversight of the diplomatic preparations.
As recently as this weekend, Trump told associates he was looking forward to the summit, which he agreed to on the spot when presented the invitation from Kim. The timeline, however, remains unknown. Officials said the current target is late May or even June.
Trump is due to meet in two weeks with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at his Mar-a-Lago estate. Abe is expected to come bearing a list of concerns about opening talks with Kim.
Our loser salesman trolling from a beach on vacation!!!!!!....what a waste of space!!!
Back to walk the beach on Cabo
Watch out for the undertow....it's pretty strong when you are drunk!!!
LOL
wp rrb has to be the least religious person here. But he insists that the Democrats and liberals are anti-religeous hypocrites.
KD the freemartin lover posted
The answer eluded fatty.
The only thing that eludes me is how can one human being be as stupid as you and not to have been killed by his own lack of brains...
Still maintaining trump can reduce the unemployment rate to 2%? Seems the only fool here is you....Idoit.
As far as your opinion goes, it's hard to think of any less-Christian attitude than what you've expressed here.
wp, when it comes to issues of faith and God, i'm not expecting you to understand a word of it.
several administration officials familiar with the discussions tell CNN.
uh huh.
i'll believe it when i hear it from a source other than cnn.
wp, when it comes to issues of faith and God, i'm not expecting you to understand a word of it.
What I do understand is that a higher percentage of Democrats are religious than are Republicans, and in particular more Catholics and Orthodox Christians are Democratic or lean Democratic.
So unless your Real Christians™ are only Evangelicals or Mormons, you're full of it.
KD the freemartin fucker posits that
Unemployment Rate
Obama Takes office Jan. 09 rate = 7.8%
Again forgetting that the Busch recession was still screaming and shedding jobs at unprecedented rates. April 2009 the rate was still rising at 8.9%. and by august reached 9.7%. That would be the starting point for the Obama reduction in spite of your vain attempt at cooking the facts, which is al you ever do. Are you this stupid or do you work at it???? Wanna try again asshole, or just slink away as you usually do with never admitting being wrong.....LOL
What I do understand is that a higher percentage of Democrats are religious than are Republicans, and in particular more Catholics and Orthodox Christians are Democratic or lean Democratic.
ah, so that explains their overwhelming support for abortions. because they're democrat catholics.
i see.
i am curious about one thing though -
how far into your colon did you have to reach for those 'higher percentages'?
support for abortions. because they're democrat catholics.
Not all catholics adhere to your stereotype, rat hole....Most catholics believe women have the right to choose, unlike you....
Oh look fatty is here, as always trolling.
Just finished a fabulous breakfast omelette and mimosas now to the infinity pool.
Does Golden Corral have omeletteS, fatty?
LMAO
Pew Reasarch Religious Landscape Study
Just the facts.
That just a poll on what religion the identify with not whether they are religious or not.
For example 54% of atheist self-identify as Democrats.
President Trump is still the President.
And Hillary will never be.
Most catholics believe women have the right to choose
In direct contradiction to church teachings?
I would think most catholics would follow church teachings or why be catholic?
Klienminded. You are fond of posting those things that so we had a part-time President during the Lost years.
Pres. Trump is Moochelle"s Daddy.
What I do understand is that a higher percentage of Democrats are religious than are Republicans
That's not what the poll says. It only breaks down a religion by political party.
It does not answer the question of which party has the most religious people.
To answer that you have have to assume a sample that has the same number of republicans as democrats.
Now the Democratics are the Party of God?
What idiot came up with that BS?
In direct contradiction to church teachings?
And what is your point? Read the link.....most catholics have a brain, unlike you....
Fat head obsessed even on vacation trolling me with
Oh look fatty is here, as always trolling.
Oh dayum, living rent free in the salesman's head he can't even avoid me when in beanertown....
Don't drink the water....LOL
And the republican's have become the party of trump...
A group of lying, womanizing, bully, budget breaking assholes just like the POTUS...
President Trump is on the verge of a new NAFTA Deal. Better for US.
President Trump China-NK nuke deal getting closer.
President Trump hammers Putin and his business buddies.
GERMANY: Three dead, 20 injured in car ramming...
Driver kills self...
London stabbings: 300 extra police deployed on streets..""
Cool Overtime Pay.
President Trump is on the verge of a new NAFTA Deal. Better for US.
BULLSHIT!!!!!
What is 50% of bullshit?????
Fatty's still here trolling, I spent the day watching whales, off the beach by the pool and just finished my massage and mani-pedi. Soon fresh tuna off the docks while you gorge at Golden Coral.
LMAO loser
Most Catholics believe women have the right to choose,
and especially when it comes to birth control.
https://my.democrats.org/Watch-the-Video
6 Apr 2018
1,546
Black Entertainment Television (BET) founder Robert Johnson said that President Donald Trump is one of the best things to ever happen to the job market for black Americans.
Appearing on CNBC’s Squawk Box, the self-made billionaire insisted that despite the current lower-than-expected number of jobs created in March, the Trump economy is strong.
When you look at that [January report], you have to say something is going right,” said the Democratic entrepreneur.
Johnson then added that Trump has been a boon for the black community.
“You have to take encouragement from what’s happening in the labor force and the job market,” Johnson told Squawk Box. “When you look at African-American unemployment, … you’ve never had African-American unemployment this low and the spread between African-Americans and whites narrowing.”
The television pioneer added that Trump’s policies have brought back into the job market people who have been out for a long time, “some of it based on discrimination, some of it based on changes in education, access and technology changes.”
Bingo
My brother Jon R. Amick has passed away this evening. 3/9/1954 4/7/2018. May he rest in peace.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
Anonymous caliphate4vr said...
Fatty's still here trolling, I spent the day watching whales
Drunker than a skunk probably....idiot..
Condolences Roger.
Sorry for your loss Roger.
Roger may he rest in peach...God Bless
peace....sorry
Commonsense said...
That just a poll on what religion the identify with not whether they are religious or not
Identify themselves AS, not "with".
What are your secret requirements for someone to "be religious", or a Real Christian™ beyound what they identify themselves as? No, don't bother answering -it will just be more denial of the facts.
Sorry to hear that Roger.
The USDA said 458,000 tonnes of U.S. soybeans were sold to undisclosed destinations, which traders and grains analysts said included EU soybean processors such as the Netherlands and Germany.
If the entire volume is confirmed to be going to the European Union, it would be the largest one-off sale to the bloc in more than 15 years, according to USDA data. The USDA could not immediately be reached for comment."
China can pound sand.
That just a poll on what religion the identify with not whether they are religious or not
Identify themselves AS, not "with".
Actually it should read: "with the religion they identify with".
What are your secret requirements for someone to "be religious", or a Real Christian™ beyound what they identify themselves as?
I have no secret requirements, the question is subjective as I pointed out earlier.
However, asking the respondents "what religion you are" is no indication of how religious a person is. It just identifies what religious tradition they either grew up with or converted to.
If I wanted to find out of someone was religious I would simply ask that question as well as the question "how often do you go to church/temple?"
Good grief. "Q.E1 What is your present religion, if any?"
As I said, you're just going to deny facts so just stop. It's a waste of time.
Good grief. "Q.E1 What is your present religion, if any?"
You made my point. That question doesn't indicate how religious you are, just what religion you follow.
And please don't even begin with it's different than "what religion you are"?
I have no time for an endless exercise in semitic bullshit you pull when you don't have a real argument.
Pres. Trump is Moochelle"s Daddy
I do love the left. They believe that "polls" are "facts".
What is your present religion, if any
A gay hating, women have no rights, science denying christian cult of mysterious origins..... about as Christian as the devil himself...
KD the fraud of Kansas posts this in light of CH always using them....
I do love the left. They believe that "polls" are "facts".
The fact remains is that your head is planted firmly up trumps ass and you are enjoying the aroma....
Thank you all. He is in heaven and resting in peace.
You made my point. That question doesn't indicate how religious you are, just what religion you follow.
You must be having a different conversation than the rest of us. Or the entire world, possibly. "how religious you are" has not been any part of it.
Or is this another lame attempt to change the subject, it being too embarrassing to admit how wrong you were.?
You were the one who claim Democrats were more religious than Republicans
And then cited the Pew poll to back-up that claim.
The poll makes no such claim and did not even measure how religious people were.
I called you on it but instead of leaving it be, you had to double down on stupid.
If anyone should be embarrassed it is you.
No I didn't - read it again.
You wrote this.
wphamilton said...
What I do understand is that a higher percentage of Democrats are religious than are Republicans, and in particular more Catholics and Orthodox Christians are Democratic or lean Democratic.
I understand plain English do you?
Evidently you don't. I said a higher percentage are religious. Which RRB questioned, and the Pew Poll proved.
You're babbling about them being "more religious" and how the poll doesn't show how serious they are about the religion.
What fantastic Day in Kansas. Help cut "hedge" fence post for a friend. He is building a 1/2 mile long fence and a few of us long time homesteaders gave him a hand. He is 26 with a wife, just starting to build thier "American Dream" on land they own.
My stihl 034 av W/ 18 " bar ran great as always . It is 26 years old, runs like new thanks to my wife small engine know how. The snow squall did not slow us down. Real work like this is great for the soul.
President Trump, did he order missile attack on Syria's Asssad?
Looks like the Israelis.
For all the hysterical talk from the left about Trump being an authortarian, it is only the left-wing who engages in authoritarian actions.
‘Unsafe to the community’: Facebook takes on pro-Trump Diamond and Silk
The hilarious duo of Diamond and Silk is a danger to society.
That’s according to Facebook.
The pro-Trump pair posted on the embattled social media platform on Friday night, saying after months of correspondence, they were deemed to be “unsafe to the community.”
Anonymous wphamilton said...
Evidently you don't. I said a higher percentage are religious. Which RRB questioned, and the Pew Poll proved.
pew didn't "prove" anything. pew reflected poll results. not the same thing.
i find it contradictive that more democrats self-report as religious, while it's been proven time and again that conservatives are more charitable.
most democrats i know claim to be atheist or agnostic. something to do with requiring the scientific method to prove the existence of God. having faith just doesn't seem to get them there.
me? i'm a non-practicing catholic formerly very deeply involved in the church. the sex scandal and ratzinger's refusal to address it drove me away. at least for a while.
i suspect i'll return someday. many do as they age. we'll see.
Blogger Commonsense said...
For all the hysterical talk from the left about Trump being an authortarian
you know, this is one circle i've been unable to square. the left keeps telling me that trump is an authoritarian, totalitarian, fascist, second coming of hitler himself...
...but then we're supposed to surrender all of our guns to the guy.
seems a tad oxymoronic, no?
The hilarious duo of Diamond and Silk is a danger to society.
They are about as hilarious as you and your hate of women, science and gays....
As a true free-market conservative, I don't necessarily agree with Facebook but Facebook is a business. Their site, their rules, free to you. If you don't like it, don't use their services. That's capitalism, not authoritarianism.
i find it contradictive that more democrats self-report as religious, while it's been proven time and again that conservatives are more charitable.
Partisanship and Charitable Giving in the United States finds that there is no relationship between charitable giving and Republican presidential voteshare.
You're probably thinking of total numbers, the total dollar amount given to charity, Republican held States in general are more generous for example.
But do you see what you have done here? You have defined a litmus test for what should be considered to be a religious person. Those who donate more money are more aptly religious, according to you. That may be true for certain sects, but it's not universal even among Protestant denominations, let alone religions in general. Almost all of them have a concept for helping those in need, but how much is given? Not a very good test.
I would rank it better than "No real Christian would support a liberal" though.
‘Unsafe to the community’: Facebook takes on pro-Trump Diamond and Silk
The hilarious duo of Diamond and Silk is a danger to society.
That’s according to Facebook."
Yep.
Look at how the left has attacked Roseanne for daring to be balanced on her show.
The Left accused her of "waterboarding" the teen on the show. Others called it "child abuse".
Look at how the left has attacked Roseanne
NO THE LEFT HAS DONE NO SUCH THING.....
RRB, polls prove things within a certain range of precision, and a given confidence in the results. Although often less accurate than people tend to believe (mainly due to unsuspected confounding factors and fickle human nature), that is the purpose of polls and the science behind them is sound.
The reasonable test for a person's religion is whatever they profess to be. Religions encompass the lip-service and hypocrites as well - some thrive on them- and don't tell me that you don't know the truth of that. The Pew poll measured by that test, and there is no reason to doubt it.
So let's recap. Unless you're considering ONLY Evangelicals and Mormons, more of them are Democrats than Republicans, or have similar numbers in the case of mainline Protestants (which slightly favor Republicans). Specifically, more Christians are Democrats or lean Democrat than are or lean Republican. Therefore, a randomly chosen "True Christian" is as likely to support a "liberal" as a "conservative".
Even among the Evangelicals, about a quarter of them are Democrats and might support a liberal politician.
Only KD who only reads faux news and chucklebee lay claim to the left attacking Roseanne
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/04/01/roseanne-returns-huckabee-reacts-left-wing-criticism-sitcom-premiere
What a hard hitting piece quoting left leaning viewers as attackers of Barr....what a crock of horseshit that the freemartin lover takes as facts....the never ending joke of Kansas.....
Ooops.....
April 9 (Reuters) - Older, white, educated voters helped Donald Trump win the White House in 2016. Now, they are trending toward Democrats in such numbers that their ballots could tip the scales in tight congressional races from New Jersey to California, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll and a data analysis of competitive districts shows.
Nationwide, whites over the age of 60 with college degrees now favor Democrats over Republicans for Congress by a 2-point margin, according to Reuters/Ipsos opinion polling during the first three months of the year. During the same period in 2016, that same group favored Republicans for Congress by 10 percentage points. (Graphic: https://tmsnrt.rs/2H39Tur)
The 12-point swing is one of the largest shifts in support toward Democrats that the Reuters/Ipsos poll has measured over the past two years. If that trend continues, Republicans will struggle to keep control of the House of Representatives, and possibly the Senate, in the November elections, potentially dooming President Donald Trump's legislative agenda.
“The real core for the Republicans is white, older white, and if they’re losing ground there, they’re going to have a tsunami,” said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist who closely tracks political races. “If that continues to November, they’re toast.”
polls prove things within a certain range of precision" OMG FUNNY
sure they do.
polls are not facts, no matter how much your really believe they are.
Opinion, sure.
OMG FUNNY
OMG you are an idiot!!!!!
Rick Scott enters Floriduh senate race....Mr do nothing running on trump coat tails.....good...that'll help with the old white folks down there.....LOL
Anonymous wphamilton said...
RRB, polls prove things within a certain range of precision, and a given confidence in the results
you know wp, i remind myself of that every time i take a trip down memory lane and reminisce about the 2016 presidential election.
that was one helluva landslide, no?
Uh, no. You could confidently say that it proved that a majority of voters did not want Trump in office however.
Anonymous wphamilton said...
Uh, no. You could confidently say that it proved that a majority of voters did not want Trump in office however.
now that you mention it, the next census will probably result in NY losing at least one and as many as two HOR seats.
anyway... fortunately, we as a nation bitterly cling to our electoral college.
The hilarious duo of Diamond and Silk is a danger to society.
i'm with wp on this one. while it is over-the-top ridiculous, this is how liberals roll. they have zero tolerance, 100% of the time, with everyone with whom they disagree.
i have never understood why a conservative would be on fuckbook or tweeter. both are run by unabashed liberals who despise conservatives and everything we stand for. why would you want to relinquish your privacy, your data, and your social network to fucking assholes like zuckerberg or dorsey?
it defies logic. both are scum, and both shall have no access to my personal info.
Post a Comment