America represents something universal in the human spirit. I received a letter not long ago from a man who said, 'You can go to Japan to live, but you cannot become Japanese. You can go to France to live and not become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Turkey, and you won't become a German or a Turk.' But then he added, 'Anybody from any corner of the world can come to America to live and become an American.' Ronald ReaganNow I think it's silly to believe that Americans have become less tolerant of race or less tolerant of differences over the past 30 years or so. Obviously we are more diverse, more open to change, and more accepting of differences than we ever have been. But the issue for some, is that certain changes never move fast enough, never go far enough, or make a big enough wave. This leads to people pushing things onto others. Forcing them to accept faster changes, bigger changes. Changes that may or may not be generally accepted by (or generally good) for society as a whole.
The reality is the statement in question made perfect sense back in the days of Ronald Reagan. It would have made sense fifty years ago, a hundred years ago, or a hundred and fifty years ago. The problem with this statement today, isn't that you cannot come to this country and be American today, because you can. Pretty much everyone accepts the legal immigrant who came here, has assimilated into the American culture and sees himself as a proud American.
The problem with this statement today is that it's not enough to simply come to America to be an American anymore. Assimilation has become a dirty word to many on the left. Assimilation is just another excuse to call someone a racist or bigot. Immigrants want our country to change for them, not the other way around. If there is resistance, they take offense. Today, you see many immigrants coming across the border, then protesting our country, while flying the flag of their home country as they do. For some illogical reason, these protesters are embraced by a portion of the country who could not (for the life of them) come up with a reasonable reason for why they embrace this.
The reality is that there are are growing number of people who believe that America (as it has existed since 1776) is not the America that they would like to live in today. They believe that America "must change" to meet their demands of how they wish to view our society. Fair enough. We always have room in America for political disagreement and for impassioned political battles for shaping and bending the future of our country. Some of those historical beliefs have been adopted as a whole, while some have been rejected soundly. Most have ended up somewhere in between pure acceptance and absolute rejection.
But the problem today is that there doesn't appear to be any room for political disagreement or an impassioned political battle by those who wish for fundamental change. For these true believers, there should be no argument. In fact, the only reason anyone would resist these chances to match their personal ideals is some form of moral deficiency. This, of course, leads to the idea that you don't actually need to convince anyone you are right. You can just call them names and attack them personally.
Now this isn't just about "immigration". Yesterday the NY Times ran an column where they suggested that we need to pretty much eliminate the Constitution itself. They don't consider it a good document, or anything that we should be following. Not at all. Rather they are representing a portion of society that sees our Constitution and Bill of Rights as an antiquated and arbitrary set of values that needs to be put aside, and replaced with something more to their liking.
Ultimately this is about large fundamental changes that some in our country would like to push on society without the political debate or the political battle. They do not wish to wait till they win enough elections to make the changes in a manner consistent with past changes to our society. They simply wish to implement them by any means possible. If that means burning down buildings, harassing political opponents, physically confronting law enforcement, then that appears to be in the cards. This is an attempt at a power grab. Nothing more nothing less. The power is "not" in their hands, they have not earned the power, but they want it anyways.
There is a reason why those on the left keep talking about a "civil war". It might be their only hope of actually garnering their utopia society.
91 comments:
Now I think it's silly to believe that Americans have become less tolerant of race or less tolerant of differences over the past 30 years or so
See Charlottesville from a year ago...the resurgence of battle flags everywhere I look and the bigotry of Laura Ingraham, your pussy grabbing charlatan potus baiting all ....just to name a view...time to open your eyes in spite of your bias....
We are wasting our time
Now I think it's silly to believe that Americans have become less tolerant of race or less tolerant of differences over the past 30 years or so.
in general i would agree, but we can't lose sight of the fact that 0linsky did his level best to set race relations back 30 years. there's a cause and effect result of his actions and rhetoric that cannot be denied.
There is a reason why those on the left keep talking about a "civil war". It might be their only hope of actually garnering their utopia society.
imo this is the one area where the left needs to be REALLY careful what they wish for. the panti-fags need to understand that their opponents are sitting on about 300 million guns and a trillion rounds of ammo.
Oops.....
The consumer-priceindex rose 0.2 percent from June after a 0.1 percent month-on-month gain the prior month, a Labor Department report showed Friday. That matched the Bloomberg survey median. Excluding food and energy, thecore gauge was also up 0.2 percent, the same as projected. The core measure on a year-over-year basis advanced 2.4 percent, the biggest jump in that measure since September 2008.
More from Bloomberg.com: Stocks Drop With Euro as Erdogan Can't Stem Rout: Markets Wrap
The results indicate steady consumer demand will sustain inflation, at a time tariffs and counter-levies by the U.S. and nations including China also threaten to lift costs on a range of goods. Sustained progress toward the Fed's goal -- based on its preferred gauge of inflation -- keeps the central bank on track for one or two more rate hikes this year.
The overall CPI gauge rose 2.9 percent in the 12 months through July, matching the survey median, the report showed. Core CPI was projected to advance 2.3 percent on an annual basis.
About 60 percent of the increase in the overall index came from a jump in shelter costs.
Those massive tax cuts helping offset the minuscule wage growth by aiding inflation...oh well, easy come....bye bye!!!
in general i would agree,
Well good for you asshole....of course you agree, you are a bigot, loser and a trump chump.....I would expect nothing less from the moronic right...Of course its Obama's fault, that is the only argument you have had for 5 + years....grow a set and fix it instead of blaming someone who is retired... deplorable idiot..
The consumer-priceindex rose 0.2 percent from June after a 0.1 percent month-on-month gain the prior month, a Labor Department report showed Friday.
yawn...
Total bullshit.
The problem with this statement today is that it's not enough to simply come to America to be an American anymore. Assimilation has become a dirty word to many on the left.
You have pulled that out of your ass. You're echoing the same people who were resisting the immigration of Italians. It was religious bigotry then. It is racist bigotry now. The protestant churches didn't want any Catholics into the country because they would bring their Pope to govern the country. John F. Kennedy had to pledge that his religious beliefs would influence his decision as President .
It started with the Birther movement and since then then candidate Trump said that the Mexicans were sending their murderers, drug traffickers and gangsters.
You're trying to turn this into simply a political difference of opinion. This is clearly racist and nothing else.
Scott you have been manipulated by the President into reversing your views on government policies and the deficits are just two examples. This is how dictators have ruled for centuries.
No it's not bullshit. Assimilation to the "white patriacal society" that is America is a dirty word with the left as is the practice of learning English.
In years past immigrents busted their butts to learn English as that wasj the road to sucess in America.
You're echoing the same people who were resisting the immigration of Italians.
you couldn't be more wrong. the paternal half of my family hails from naples and sicily, and while they did struggle a little to establish themselves in the America, they made every effort to assimilate as soon as humanly possible. back in those days assimilation into American society was REQUIRED if one wanted to succeed. does that mean they abandoned their culture, customs and native language? not at all. were they discriminated against? sure. so were the irish, the jews, the poles, the germans... you name it.
it was understood that to get ahead in their new homeland meant integrating, not isolating themselves into society.
yawn...
Cat got your tongue, rectum?????
the bump in CPI was expected, d0pie. the economically literate understand that it's a given in a growing economy.
Almost every Mexican I meet can speak at least basic English. Those who have been successful speak English. You're upset because you hear people speaking in Spanish instead of English. There are neighborhoods near me where almost every single business sign is in Korean. Are you troubled with that?
Go to Westminster California in Orange county where the business signs are in Vietnamese. Is that a clear sign that they don't want to assimilate into the country?
Give us a fucking break. The President is a bigot.
Almost every Mexican I meet can speak at least basic English. Those who have been successful speak English. You're upset because you hear people speaking in Spanish instead of English. There are neighborhoods near me where almost every single business sign is in Korean. Are you troubled with that?
Go to Westminster California in Orange county where the business signs are in Vietnamese. Is that a clear sign that they don't want to assimilate into the country?
Roger
You have not challenged anything I stated.
Simple question.
Do you believe that people who immigrate to our country should do their best to fit in... or do you believe that it's up to society to bend and change to accommodate those who move here.
Another simple question.
Should we spend more money on our border security to keep criminals, traffickers, and gang members from entering... or do you believe that spending more money on border security is bad, because it will prevent "honest" people from entering the country?
Another simple question.
Do you believe that we should follow the constitution and bill of rights?
Kennedy: Rev. Meza, Rev. Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation to speak my views.
While the so-called religious issue is necessarily and properly the chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election: the spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida; the humiliating treatment of our president and vice president by those who no longer respect our power; the hungry children I saw in West Virginia; the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills; the families forced to give up their farms; an America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space.
Article continues after sponsorship
These are the real issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious issues — for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious barriers.
But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected president, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured — perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again not what kind of church I believe in — for that should be important only to me — but what kind of America I believe in.
I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute, where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference; and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the president who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.
I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials; and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.
For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jew-- or a Quaker or a Unitarian or a Baptist. It was Virginia's harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson's statute of religious freedom. Today I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you — until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Almost every Mexican I meet can speak at least basic English.
good for you alky.
i wish that was the case where i've lived the past 20 years. in kansas i lived in a brand new development that relied heavily on hispanic labor. and it was the white job site super's who had to learn spanish, not the other way around.
here in NY i can walk onto any farm within 100 miles of where i'm sitting right now and if there are multiple hispanics working on any given farm, maybe 1, 2 tops speaks a word of english.
and posting your nonsense twice in bold for emphasis is not impressive in the least. in fact, it reinforces my belief that your "argument" is total bullshit.
you're a one trick pony alky, and your stock in trade is trump hatred.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Kennedy: Rev. Meza, Rev. Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation to speak my views.
LOL. i knew it was only a matter of time until you posted this.
don't be a scumbag their, alky. post the link:
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16920600
Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end; where all men and all churches are treated as equal; where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice; where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind; and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.
That is the kind of America in which I believe. And it represents the kind of presidency in which I believe — a great office that must neither be humbled by making it the instrument of any one religious group, nor tarnished by arbitrarily withholding its occupancy from the members of any one religious group. I believe in a president whose religious views are his own private affair, neither imposed by him upon the nation, or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office.
I would not look with favor upon a president working to subvert the First Amendment's guarantees of religious liberty. Nor would our system of checks and balances permit him to do so. And neither do I look with favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the Constitution by requiring a religious test — even by indirection — for it. If they disagree with that safeguard, they should be out openly working to repeal it.
I want a chief executive whose public acts are responsible to all groups and obligated to none; who can attend any ceremony, service or dinner his office may appropriately require of him; and whose fulfillment of his presidential oath is not limited or conditioned by any religious oath, ritual or obligation.
This is the kind of America I believe in, and this is the kind I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died for in Europe. No one suggested then that we may have a "divided loyalty," that we did "not believe in liberty," or that we belonged to a disloyal group that threatened the "freedoms for which our forefathers died."
And in fact ,this is the kind of America for which our forefathers died, when they fled here to escape religious test oaths that denied office to members of less favored churches; when they fought for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom; and when they fought at the shrine I visited today, the Alamo. For side by side with Bowie and Crockett died McCafferty and Bailey and Carey. But no one knows whether they were Catholic or not, for there was no religious test at the Alamo.
I ask you tonight to follow in that tradition, to judge me on the basis of my record of 14 years in Congress, on my declared stands against an ambassador to the Vatican, against unconstitutional aid to parochial schools, and against any boycott of the public schools (which I have attended myself)-- instead of judging me on the basis of these pamphlets and publications we all have seen that carefully select quotations out of context from the statements of Catholic church leaders, usually in other countries, frequently in other centuries, and always omitting, of course, the statement of the American Bishops in 1948, which strongly endorsed church-state separation, and which more nearly reflects the views of almost every American Catholic.
I do not consider these other quotations binding upon my public acts. Why should you? But let me say, with respect to other countries, that I am wholly opposed to the state being used by any religious group, Catholic or Protestant, to compel, prohibit, or persecute the free exercise of any other religion. And I hope that you and I condemn with equal fervor those nations which deny their presidency to Protestants, and those which deny it to Catholics. And rather than cite the misdeeds of those who differ, I would cite the record of the Catholic Church in such nations as Ireland and France, and the independence of such statesmen as Adenauer and De Gaulle.
But let me stress again that these are my views. For contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me.
Whatever issue may come before me as president — on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject — I will make my decision in accordance with these views, in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressures or dictates. And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide otherwise.
But if the time should ever come — and I do not concede any conflict to be even remotely possible — when my office would require me to either violate my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do the same.
But I do not intend to apologize for these views to my critics of either Catholic or Protestant faith, nor do I intend to disavow either my views or my church in order to win this election.
If I should lose on the real issues, I shall return to my seat in the Senate, satisfied that I had tried my best and was fairly judged. But if this election is decided on the basis that 40 million Americans lost their chance of being president on the day they were baptized, then it is the whole nation that will be the loser — in the eyes of Catholics and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history, and in the eyes of our own people.
But if, on the other hand, I should win the election, then I shall devote every effort of mind and spirit to fulfilling the oath of the presidency — practically identical, I might add, to the oath I have taken for 14 years in the Congress. For without reservation, I can "solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, so help me God.
The fact that this was over 50 years ago doesn't make it any less true to the American dream.
Roger
You have not challenged anything I stated.
LMAO.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16920600
The fact that this was over 50 years ago doesn't make it any less true to the American dream.
if only you saw the irony of your post.
you'd never hear moose-limb giving a similar speech in this country. a death squad would honor-kill his or her ass by daybreak the next day.
ask Ayaan Hirsi Ali what her life has been like for the past several years.
oh boy. alky posted a speech. whee!
now answer CH's questions.
c'mon coward. take a shot. put that 137 IQ to work and craft a rebuttal.
show us how it's done, alky.
Once again our esteemed host trolls the world with his biased fucked up view that america has become more tolerant....polls seem not to support that BS
Arlington, VA — According to the latest POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, a majority of voters (55%) say race relations have worsened under President Trump, compared with just 16% who see improvement. The poll comes in the run-up to the one-year anniversary of the unrest in Charlottesville, in which protesters descended on the central Virginia town to oppose the removal of a statue of Confederate war general Robert E. Lee.
Just over half of white voters (51%) say race relations have worsened under Trump, while larger majorities of African-American voters (79%) and Hispanics (60%) believe relations have deteriorated. The split is even more pronounced along political party lines. Self-identified Democratic voters overwhelmingly say race relations have worsened under Trump (82%), compared with only 4% who see improvement.
i wish that was the case where i've lived the past 20 years. in kansas i
That alone is the answer...Kansas, they are barely literate there, why would you think otherwise....20 years is a generation asshole...
thanks for confirming that you've never been to kansas, d0pie.
well fuck...
politico's liberals have made it clear that they just don't care for trump.
and up until now we've been wondering about their opinion....
heh.
go0d job d0pie. now go find us some more liberals who don't like trump.
boy, nothing sends the alky scurrying away like asking him to respond to a legitimate question with a thought of his very own.
Spam by the drunkard.
You have not challenged anything I stated.
Scott. I addressed your points very carefully and clearly.
Simple question.
Do you believe that people who immigrate to our country should do their best to fit in... or do you believe that it's up to society to bend and change to accommodate those who move here. Our society has been enriched by the multiple ethnic and cultures that have been assimilated by the millions. Your ethnic group is part of the American society. 120 years ago in New York there were many many Italian restaurants where most of the people who worked there and ate the food didn't speak English well. The children of the Mexican immigrant and former United States Marine speak and write better English than rrb. Hugo is a naturalize American citizen. They represent the vast majority of the Mexican immigrant population.
Another simple question.
Should we spend more money on our border security to keep criminals, traffickers, and gang members from entering... or do you believe that spending more money on border security is bad, because it will prevent "honest" people from entering the country? Of course and we have been trying to figure out who is a legitimate refugee, whom we used to admit through the Golden Doors from the drug dealers and gangsters. The Zero Tolerance policy threw that policy under the partisan bus. The separation of hundreds or thousands of children is not representative of for what we have stood for since 1776. We can keep the borders safe without the fucking wall that Mexico was going to pay for.
Another simple question.
Do you believe that we should follow the constitution and bill of rights?
Absolutely. This is the first President to attack our security and legal institutions since Nixon put J.Edgar Hoover out of control of the FBI for his own political purposes and bigotry.
He has stated repeatedly that he has the authority to do anything he wants to do without restrictions short of impeachment. Do you believe in the Bill of rights and the Constitution? Or do you believe whatever the President says it means?
wow alky. you managed to not answer every single question posed by CH.
good job.
you did what i suspected you would do - you poorly crafted several non sequiturs regarding trump.
TDS is no substitute for rationality and logic, alky.
Should we spend more money on our border security to keep criminals, traffickers, and gang members from entering... or do you believe that spending more money on border security is bad, because it will prevent "honest" people from entering the country?
The Zero Tolerance policy was arbitrary and designed to please his base. It has not decreased the number of immigrants attempting to enter the country.
Good post, CH.
WHICH makes it the perfect place for the drunk to spam with meaningless dribble.
I answered every question.
You might not understand because it's over your head again.
The Zero Tolerance policy was arbitrary and designed to please his base. It has not decreased the number of immigrants attempting to enter the country.
take another crack at it alky.
the question is - Should we spend more money on our border security to keep criminals, traffickers, and gang members from entering... or do you believe that spending more money on border security is bad, because it will prevent "honest" people from entering the country?
the question is about border security SPENDING, alky. not whether zero tolerance is an effective policy.
try again.
hey alky, i have some fucksticks just as whacked as you right here in my own backyard:
A University of Albany professor predicts that Trump voters will "provoke violence" on a grand scale when Donald Trump departs from the Oval Office, even if Trump completes two full terms.
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11202
you need to figure out how to monetize your TDS like she did.
wow alky. you managed to not answer every single question posed by CH.
He sort of answered the third, by agreeing that we should follow it.
Then of course, he shows his ignorance by suggesting that Trump is acting against the constitution by performing the normal jobs that normal Presidents are allowed to do under the constitution.
Or suggesting that there is something in the constitution that states that a President is supposed to defer to the Departments that work for him, as opposed to the other way around.
But in all three questions...
Roger cannot separate the concept of simple political decisions from his hatred of Trump. Not understanding that these questions have absolutely NOTHING to do with one President who will only serve at most eight years.
But of course, as Roger proves over and over and over... Trump pays free rent to reside over 90% of Roger's mind. It must really suck to be a slave to the man, as Roger most certainly is. It must really suck to not be able to make a simple decision or answer a single question without being ALL CONSUMED ALL THE TIME over Trump.
We still don't know whether Roger expects that immigrants should assimilate to our culture, or if our culture should assimilate to adjust for immigrants. But apparently he thinks it's important to tell us that Italians open up Italian restaurants.
We still don't know if Roger things we should spend more money on border security. But apparently he believes that actually arresting people who cross the border is the wrong plan.
The fact that he thinks he answered these questions, just dropped my opinion of his IQ from 92 to 91.
CHT, can't you even see Trump is making you ask these questions of Roger.
Boy are you brainwashed beyond repair.
ROFLMFAO !!!
Roger, please attempt to think for yourself.
Put down the water buckets.
IF your on Social security, or get other transfer of tax dollars or your a union worker. Trump has some good news for ya.
"The core measure on a year-over-year basis advanced 2.4 percent, the biggest jump in that measure since September 2008."
Roger AmickAugust 10, 2018 at 10:01 AM
We are wasting our time"
Roger, without going to cut n paste.
What top three things are today's Cortez owned Socialist Democrat running on this year?
To give your team credit, your message is at best muddled.
Vox scored the combined free shit promises IF the your team wins at 23 Trillion.
You good with that number?
Omarosa Manigault Newman, the former "Apprentice" contestant who became a White House aide, says in her new book that President Donald Trump is a "racist" who used the N-word — and tried to silence her with money and legal threats.
In her upcoming tell-all book entitled "Unhinged," to be published next week and obtained by NBC News directly from the publisher, Manigault Newman alleges that Trump was caught on a microphone saying the N-word "multiple times" during the filming of "The Apprentice," and says there is a tape to prove her allegation.
Manigault Newman wrote that she did not hear Trump use the slur, nor has she listened to the alleged tape. She cites three sources as having told her of the existence of the tape and what Trump says on it.
Roger the dodger changes subjects again...
By the way, I've heard that there is a tape that caught R.T.D. calling President Obama the "N" word. I haven't heard him say it. I never heard the tape. I don't know where the tape is or how you can get it. But I have anonymous sources who claim that a tape exists.
says in her new book that President Donald Trump is a "racist" who used the N-word
well i guess you have more in common with trump than you think, alky.
Manigault Newman wrote that she did not hear Trump use the slur, nor has she listened to the alleged tape. She cites three sources as having told her of the existence of the tape and what Trump says on it.
you really got him this time alky!!!
IMPEACH!!!11!
"Roger the dodger changes subjects again..."
SHOCK.
Let me clear some things up. I do not live in Rogers head.
I live in the White House.
I am supremely happy so Roger will say there's a supremist in the White House.
I actually spend any available time when not watching Fox News reading this blog.
Roger is not the lowest iq on the blog, he's second.
The first has earned his moniker, lo iq commie. Nothing I can do will help out either.
We spent 1.7 million on what ???? We should have spent that on the wall and put a plaque on it. English and Spanish.
Unbelievable and Roger's fortune will cost some poor youth a fortune.
That is probably more than Roger made his entire life.
Time for the 5
"well i guess you have more in common with trump than you think, alky."
Boom!
Using historical references seemed to have escaped the 98 IQ host.
If I could open topics I wouldn't post breaking Fake News .
If I could open topics
Your problem is that you cannot seem to actually finish any topics. You just get cornered and run away!!
Roger, is the hospice side of this blog dead?
IF not post your topic there, I hear from you people flock to hear you.
"You just get cornered and run away!!"
Pop spitting funny, and true.
I ripped you to shreds.
Roger is delusional.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
I ripped you to shreds.
LOL. you couldn't even answer a direct question, you drunken sot.
I hope he is kidding. His IQ is that of a field mouse.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
If I could open topics I wouldn't post breaking Fake News .
you've already destroyed one blog, alky:
Editor's Note:
The views of Roger Amick are in no way endorsed or supported by me, and should not be considered representative of either the historical or current Coldheartedtruth blog.
C.H. Truth
The nation State of Turkey is in a economic meltdown.
The views of Roger Amick are in no way endorsed or supported by me,
Now there is a gigantic who gives a flying fuck rectum breath!!!!
hope he is kidding. His IQ is that of a field mouse.
Which is certainly better than your gnat brain, asshole
September 4th, 2018
The Kavanaugh Hearings Start.
Fucking awesome. Let’s enjoy the shit the left is going to go thru. Let them "embrace the Suck" of losing elections.
Commie pops out of alky's rectum, again.
Mayor of Chicago and Obama"s home town of Shitcago is off to a lovely summer weekend.
Ten shot
Two Dead
So much for the idiot of kansas 4.6% wage growth......something only he knows about....just like menstrals .6% gdp growth in busch's last quarter......delusional and sad....
U.S. wage growth is getting wiped out entirely by inflation
The good news: Pay is up 2.7 percent in the past year. The bad news: The cost of living is up 2.9 percent. This means, according to Labor Department figures, that U.S. workers' paychecks are worth less than they were a year ago.
By Heather Long
Wrong.
Can you find your error?
You own that number".6% gdp growth"
Errors riddle your post, it is like talking with Roger The Dodger.
You own that number".6% gdp growth"
Hey asshole....menstral the cramp owns that all by himself....4.6% is your fantasy rate, no one else but you. has said that...you really are fucking delusional, nothing new there asshole....A brick has more intellect than you.....idiot....show me an error.....other than you cannot back up your wage growth delusion...
If only you could post something of economic value that is correct.
Oh well, keep trying .
"show me an error..." Roger's Rectum puppet.
Answer : ok , to make the CPI correct you have to purchase every item in the "baskets of Goods".
This is where you thank me.
"What is the CPI used for?
Because the CPI indicates prices changes—both up and down—for the average consumer, the index is used as a way to adjust income payments for certain groups of people.
For instance, more than 2 million U.S. workers are covered by collective bargaining agreements, which tie wages to the CPI. If the CPI goes up, so do their wages.
The CPI also affects many of those on Social Security—47.8 million Social Security beneficiaries receive adjusted increases in income tied to the CPI. Also, millions of military and Federal Civil Service retirees and survivors have benefits tied to the CPI, as do about 22 million food stamp recipients."
President Trump has been tweeting about the Fake News and the Muller investigation. But he will never tweet against the white supremacist and KKK demonstration planned for the weekend in Washington DC.
The "Unite the Right" white nationalist rally that sparked riots in Charlottesville, Virginia last year is coming to the nation's capital over the weekend to commemorate last year's event.
Between the lines: Though the group will be free to commemorate last year's rally after being granted a permit by the city, businesses that rally-goers would typically look to for lodging and transportation have considered refusing them service.
Show less
The details: Businesses including Uber, Lyft and Airbnb are debating whether their members — drivers or hosts, in these cases — should have the option to refuse service to those participating in the rally.
Airbnb said it may expel rally participants from its service, citing its "community commitment" policy users agree to stating that everyone must be treated equally, ABC News reports.
Drivers for both Uber and Lyft have debated on whether they should work during the DC rally, according to the Washington Post.
Uber also announced it would permit its drives to kick white nationalists out of their vehicles.
The big picture: This isn't out of the blue for Uber. Drivers have previously been harassed by white nationalists while giving rides, BuzzFeed News reported. Last year, a female black driver reported racist comments from two passengers who were subsequently banned from the service.
Cities have taken extra precautions ahead of Sunday's rally as well.
A state of emergency has been declared in Virginia and Charlottesville for rallies commemorating last year's protests.
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser promised tightened security ahead of the controversial rally, USA Today reports.
The bottom line: Companies are wary of the danger the rally could present after what happened at last year's rally in Charlottesville and don't want to have a hand in chaos that my come forth this year.
The CPI is not a cost of living index.
The CPI is not a cost of living index.
Who alleges that asshole???? You again talking our your skinny white ass!!! You really are a dumb fuck who cannot answer his own stupidity. Yeah you went to flunky U!!
A measure of changes in the purchasing-power of a currency and the rate of inflation. The consumer price index expresses the current prices of a basket of goods and services in terms of the prices during the same period in a previous year, to show effect of inflation on purchasing power. It is one of the best known lagging indicators. See also producer price index.
Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/consumer-price-index-CPI.html
What ever you make up is your problem, not mine....idiot.
The CPI is not a cost of living index.
Which has nothing to do with your bullshit 4.6% wage growth....typical stupid idiot trying to cover his own inane unsupported opinion!!!!!
Good morning Dennis.
"show me an error(s)" slow Dennis
I did. Your welcome.
I did. Your welcome.
You did nothing of the sort.....asshole....all you did was make up another lie which shows your desperate attempt of change the subject....still nothing but bullshit on 4.6% wage growth as you conflate that with inflation numbers or whatever you want to call the number I posted. You are a stupid fucking troll who really needs to just go away
Yeah, you showed me the same stupidity that menstral the cramp did with his alleged graph of .6% growth.....still, just like you, has never admitted that busch's last quarter was bleeding GDP and jobs which you still blame Obama for....dayum you are a walking pile of shit.....asshole
Here's a tip Dennis. People may take your arguments more seriously if you didn't pepper them with gratitutious, vulgar insults.
Then again, maybe not.
"Then again, maybe not."
NOT.
you didn't pepper them with gratitutious, vulgar insults.
Seems to me when I kept those out of play....yours and others, stupidity as in .6% growth.....never wavered....Using what you consider vulgar language is just indicative of a cultist mindset which never changes... I note your concerns and basically don't give a fuck what you or loretta think.... Here's a tip.....try again......I don't hold out any hope of rational discourse here with you and the losers sucking on trumps dick!!! But it is fun making you all look like fools daily!!
"But it is fun making you all look like fools daily!!"
"a troll (/troʊl, trɒl/) is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement."
Trolls here:
James Boswell, Roger and the Russian commie.
Lowretta the loser postulates that...
Trolls here:
Sad how she excludes herself, the rectum, cramps and the goat fucker......why is that old lady????
"But it is fun making you all look like fools daily!!"
Boorish and trolling.
"a troll (/troʊl, trɒl/) is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement."
Trolls here:
James Boswell, Roger and the Russian commie.
Hit the send button before realizing she too is a troll????? Funny how old age affects the ability to remember....oh we'll
The difference is I know I troll around here....it is so easy to get fools to respond to every dog whistle I post...The sad part, is you can't admit it...Oh well, we are all trolls screwing with others, especially you and your alky posts with rectum breath.....
Grow up Dennis.
Grow up Dennis.
Find a working brain McPhee
Post a Comment