Doctor Ford came forward with this recollection in family therapy in 2012. There are some inconsistencies in her recollection of the incident.
This doesn't necessarily mean that she is lying.
This doesn't necessarily mean that she is lying.
She might not be lying, therefore he must be a rapist?
We ruin his career, people make threats against his wife and kids, and we smear a good man's reputation because the "inconsistencies" of her allegations "doesn't necessarily mean she is lying"?
I wonder if there are any other situations (other than attacking conservative politicians) that this sort of logic applies.
46 comments:
Let's remember that 65 women who knew him in high school, including two who dated him, have spoken out in support of his character, behavior and integrity.
That doesn't happen when the guy is a rapist.
"So this is the new found liberal burden to call a white conservative a rapist?"
Yep.
Don't forget she called him a wannabe murderer.
BTW.
I am not attempting to defeat or destroy Mr Cavanaugh because he is a conservative. I would not vote for his confirmation because I don't agree with his political views that I believe that alter his interpretations of the Constitution beyond the law. Those reasons are where we agree to disagree. That's politics.
I do believe that the drunken 17 year old kid attempted to rape her. This is why I don't want him on the Supreme Court.
Dr Cray Cray and her Alt-left gaggle of political operatives and lawyers have set non-negotiationable conditions.
Time to tell her to go fuck herself.
Alky , "BTW" total BS.
Exactly. You often provide the truth without the intent to do so.
(the "inconsistencies" of her allegations "doesn't necessarily mean she is lying")
Did Dr Cray Cray intise the 4 boys into having sex with her. Is she a cock tease?
Alky agrees with Alky.
Dumbass, you missed that CHT was quoting you.
I do believe that the drunken 17 year old kid attempted to rape her. This is why I don't want him on the Supreme Court.
And If the drunkien 17 year old kid was not Kavanaugh or the drunken 17 year old kid never existed outside of Ford's mind?
Ford has still not agreed to testify under oath. That should tell you something.
If you were not a tool that is.
I do believe that the drunken 17 year old kid attempted to rape her. This is why I don't want him on the Supreme Court.
You only believe that because he is a white conservative, and because you don't want him on the Supreme Court.
_______
Of the five people she claims were there, three of the unequivocally deny that such a Party took place.
According to her own description of the house, that house does not match the description of any of the other four people who she claims were there.
So have multiple inconsistencies. There is factual evidence that contradicts what she is saying, and everyone who has stepped forward (but her) deny that there was ever such a Party.
Moreover, the claim is nothing but a 36 year old memory.
You have to desperately "want" to believe he is guilty to believe as such. Everything else points to her being mistaken about what happened.
I do believe that the drunken 17 year old kid attempted to rape her. This is why I don't want him on the Supreme Court.
LOL.
yeah right, alky. sure. that's it. a kid is accused of playing a little grab ass almost 40 years ago and that's the big disqualifier for him to sit on the USSC.
you're such a fucking fraud. almost as big a fraud as dr. cray cray herself.
oh, and the phony death threats that dr. cray cray has supposedly been receiving?
yeah... mrs. kavanaugh has been getting some real ones.
nice work, alky. your comrades on the left are nothing if not predictable.
oh, and if you're looking for a real sexual assault that has actually happened and happened very recently, keith bin ellison's ex is desperately trying to get someone, anyone to listen to her.
CNN has evidence. How long have they had it and why , only now are they releasing it. Game changer.
it's utterly amazing to see how liberals are so quick to dispense with all the rules in order to destroy a man whose politics they disagree with.
no right to confront his accuser.
no presumption of innocence.
no due process.
no right to cross-examine.
no nothing.
because abortion, kavanaugh must be destroyed.
so help me out here guys... who are the actual fascists again?
The Cleveland Browns are a racist organization.
Last night they replaced the failed Black QB With a White QB.
And they won.
rrb said...
it's utterly amazing to see how liberals are so quick to dispense with all the rules in order to destroy a man whose politics they disagree with.
no right to confront his accuser.
no presumption of innocence.
no due process.
no right to cross-examine.
no nothing.
because abortion, kavanaugh must be destroyed.
so help me out here guys... who are the actual fascists again?
And remember the accused has not seen the letter that has the "evidence" of the assault. other Democrats only a redacted version. Justice, as Roger sees it, is the accused is supposed to go in blind and first, try to defend himself then get blindsided by whatever she wrote. And she wants to limit her questioning and by whom. And do this in front of millions with the normal Democratic agitators doing their theatrics.
Not the America most Americans want to live in.
Grassley should tell difi give me the damn letter today or we vote on Monday.
These Are the Marching Orders
I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!
And that this whole thing is the Democrats are trying to make the United States a socialist state.
10 am is the deadline set by Sen. Grassley for a yes or no from her on testifying.
Consider the spectacle: Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court, the embodiment of a modern rule of law, is being decided in the Senate by the medieval practice of trial by ordeal, such as surviving immersion in fire or ice. Trial by ordeal was outlawed by the Lateran Council in 1215.
Or worse, the standards of the mob in the Roman Colosseum, turning thumbs up or down on the combatants. Though unlike the Senate Democrats, the Roman mob at least had an open mind.
Incidentally, the standard trope that Donald Trump has degraded our politics? We don’t need to hear that anymore. Or about the moral certitudes of the religious right.
Is there a sadder figure in the modern Democratic Party than Sen. Dianne Feinstein? Elected to the Senate in 1992, Mrs. Feinstein has produced a creditable career. Her above-it-all reputation was never quite deserved, but she has at least performed with dignity.
Now, seeking re-election at 85, she is getting heat from the progressive-dominated Democratic Party in California, the world capital of identity-only politics. By withholding from the committee the accusatory Ford letter that came into her possession nearly two months ago, Sen. Feinstein ensured the nomination’s descent into such a hapless, cynical moment. This will be the most remembered event in Sen. Feinstein’s career.
The Kavanaugh nomination, “given what we know,” has come down to an undiscoverable accusation. The defeat of a Supreme Court nominee on this basis would be a victory for a level of conscious political nullification not seen in the U.S. for a long time. Republicans in the Senate shouldn’t allow it, and voters in November should not affirm it.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-democrats-have-become-1537397973
You are a lying son of a bitch.
"You only believe that because he is a white conservative, and because you don't want him on the Supreme Court."
Most young girls who are sexually abused don't tell their parents or authorities.
I know a woman who was abused by a neighbor who was a police officer in Rapid City South Dakota. She didn't tell her parents about the abuse from decades. No one is claiming that she made it up.
It's funny that rrb is copy and pasting a lot of information. He always told us that I couldn't make my own opinions.
Why didn't somebody call the FBI 36 years ago?
Donald Trump
So Roger, tell us what are the details in the letter which forms the basis of your conclusion?
A single 36 year old accusation not made at the time, without any substantiated details or corroboration can't be, right?
Or are you just that far over the edge with partisan TDS?
never mind
I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!
well alky, there's only one problem -
this is outside the jurisdiction of the FBI, and local law enforcement wouldn't touch this with a 100 ft. pole.
we're talking about a 36 year old accusation of high school grab ass. that's it. asking local law enforcement to pursue this elicits a response somewhere between uncontrolled laughter and "ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME???"
not to mention the fact that outside the pool of lunatic liberal judges out there, you couldn't find a reputable judge to allow this case to ever see the inside of a courtroom.
and not for nothing, but since democrats seem to excel in the arena of unintended consequences, if this is a "burden of proof" precedent that you guys are willing to set, expect it to be used against you as soon as the smoke clears from this current shitshow.
i can see an avalanche of letters being sent accusing democrat politicians of all sorts of sordid behavior, going all the way back to nursery school. because #metoo.
this is a classic 'be careful what you wish for' situation, alky. and if you're willing go this low all for the sake of abortion, when the shoe ends up on the other foot it'll hurt like hell.
Roger Amick said...
It's funny that rrb is copy and pasting a lot of information. He always told us that I couldn't make my own opinions.
a lot.
one post, alky.
one.
and i did something you never do - i included the link. i didn't steal it and attempt to pass it off as my own.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
You are a lying son of a bitch.
start your own blog, liver boy. lord knows you have the time.
show some respect for our host, alky.
I know a woman who was abused by a neighbor who was a police officer in Rapid City South Dakota. She didn't tell her parents about the abuse from decades. No one is claiming that she made it up.
that's nice.
nice and irrelevant.
you fucking fraud.
Brit HumeVerified account @brithume
Amid repeated calls for an investigation as a condition of Dr. Ford’s testifying, it’s worth noting that Judiciary Commitee investigators have been doing exactly that this week. But Democratic investigators have refused to participate.
It's almost like the Democrats don't believe her and are afraid of what they may find. Certainly not the actions of a normal group supporting a "victim"
Roger Amick said...
Why didn't somebody call the FBI 36 years ago?
Donald Trump
it's called mockery, alky. which is all dr. cray cray and you are entitled to.
So Roger, tell us what are the details in the letter which forms the basis of your conclusion?
you mean the letter that even grassley has not been allowed to see? the letter that's also been withheld from the FBI?
THAT letter?
alky says we don't need no stinkin' letter.
kavanaugh guilty because abortion.
good point:
Joel B. Pollak
Verified account
@joelpollak
Follow Follow @joelpollak
More
The only possible reason for Dr. Ford to demand a Thursday hearing (as opposed to Wednesday/Tuesday or the scheduled Monday) is to prevent the Senate from voting to confirm Brett Kavanaugh before month's end, leaving him off the bench when the Supreme Court's next session starts.
6:43 PM - 20 Sep 2018
3,577 Retweets 6,100 Likes 💜Trump Girl 💜CDRCHOPRobyn WadeThinker❌Laguna EagleEvoluteLynseyaranomBen Jammin 🇺🇸
317 replies 3,577 retweets 6,100 likes
Reply 317 Retweet 3.6K Like 6.1K
https://twitter.com/joelpollak/status/1042952334987292672
it’s worth noting that Judiciary Commitee investigators have been doing exactly that this week. But Democratic investigators
You mean they are acting like trey gowdy and devin nunes making believe they are looking at something while already having made up their minds.....Is that what is noteworthy?????? Kavanaugh with out a doubt will be legislating from the bench! Between women rights and the POTUS being non indictable are 2 things that congress and senate should address, not numb nutz drunken teen molester!!!!
just so we're clear on what's really going on here alky...
Alinsky said: “The end justifies almost any means. All effective actions require the passport of morality. You do what you can and clothe it in moral garments…moral rationalization is indispensable at times of action, whether to justify the selection or the use of ends and means.”
He also said, “All values and factors are relative.”
https://constitution.com/saul-alinsky-does-the-supreme-court/
Joel Barry Pollak (born 25 April 1977) is a South African-American conservative political commentator, writer, and attorney. He currently serves as the senior-editor-at-large for Breitbart News.[1][2] In 2010 he was the Republican nominee for U.S. Congress from Illinois's 9th congressional district, losing decisively to incumbent Democrat Jan Schakowsky with 31% of the vote.[3]
This alien should go back where he was born...probably got in by mistake!!! At least he graduated college unlike our ag school drop out....
Hey lo iq commie
It's the point he is making, not the person.
Again, darn sad. Every issue that is discussed alky does this B.S.. "I know a woman" .
Sure you do.
Did you invest like alky?
On Nov 9th, 2016 did you dump any holdings you had?
Funny, how rat the rectum posted some negative things about ford which I stated so fucking what.....Seems his sources were as full of ahit as he is.....but he felt manly posting the crap...
Yahoo News explains: Myths about Christine Blasey Ford debunked
By Dean Arrindell
Since Christine Blasey Ford came forward on Sunday, accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were teenagers, she has been subjected to death threats and email hacking, and her family has had to leave their home and hire security, according to her lawyers.
Myths about Ford that attempt to discredit her have also been circulating. The myths have been debunked. Yahoo News explains.
Myth: Students left bad reviews about Ford on a website.
Fact: Ford is a professor at Palo Alto University, and several right-wing media outlets said she received negative reviews on the website RateMyProfessors.com calling her “mad,” “troubled” and “unprofessional.”
The reviews exist, but they were about another professor: Christine Adams Ford at California State University, Fullerton.
Myth: Ford is a major Democratic donor.
Fact: Ford is a registered Democrat, which was disclosed when she came forward in the Washington Post.
The Mercury News in San Jose, Calif., reports that she attended a Women’s March protesting Trump in 2017 and wore a pink “brain hat” in a March for Science in 2017 that protested the Trump administration’s proposed cuts to science research.
But her donations to Democratic committees and campaigns were small. According to the Federal Election Commission, they totaled around $80 between 2013 and 2017.
Myth: Brett Kavanagh’s mother ruled against Ford’s parents in a foreclosure case.
Fact: Kavanaugh’s mother, Martha Kavanaugh, presided as a Maryland district court judge in a foreclosure case where Ford’s parents, Ralph and Paula Blasey, were the defendants in 1996.
However, the Blaseys were able to refinance their mortgage, and according to CBS News, Judge Martha Kavanaugh dismissed the case. The dismissal allowed the Blaseys to keep their house.
It's the point he is making, not the person.
Hey fucking asshole.....SO FUCKING WHAT!!!! I don't like foreigners poking their noses in US politics....fuck him!!!
first the negative reviews of her have been removed and were not the existing one from a different professor
second while her donations may have been small her activism is not denied
third Brett Kavanagh’s mother did rule against Ford’s parents in a foreclosure case
So once again lo iq commie has been left with copying easily debunked left-wing talkin points.
and he still hasn't addressed the substance of rrb's post.
but lo iq commie did leave this:
lo iq commie said...
It's the point he is making, not the person.
Hey fucking asshole.....SO FUCKING WHAT!!!! I don't like foreigners poking their noses in US politics....fuck him!!!
look at lo iq commie, he's quite the debater.
ROFLMFAO !!!
"Roman law, which guaranteed persons accused of a crime the right to look their accusers in the eye."
Obama's Transformers want to make up new law.
I think that he didn't want the truth about the collusion to come out.
President Trump on Friday walked back his order earlier this week to declassify information in the ongoing probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, saying Justice Department officials and others had persuaded him not to do so for the time being.
The retreat from his declassification decree issued just four days ago underscores the ongoing tensions between the White House and the Justice Department over the probe by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who is examining whether any Trump associates may have conspired with the Kremlin to interfere in the election.
In a pair of Friday morning tweets, Trump said: “I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release. Therefore, the Inspector General has been asked to review these documents on an expedited basis. I believe he will move quickly on this (and hopefully other things which he is looking at). In the end I can always declassify if it proves necessary. Speed is very important to me - and everyone!”
His reversal was preceded by a series of conversations between White House lawyer Emmet Flood and senior law enforcement and intelligence officials — chief among them deputy attorney general Rod J. Rosenstein, according to people familiar with the discussions, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
stop stealing from the amazon post and calling it your own, alky...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-walks-back-his-plan-to-declassify-russia-probe-documents/2018/09/21/79d95f94-bdac-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6dcc2d20dc61
Alky can't think for himself.
Good catch again RRB.
Roger the woman you knew was raped by a cop , did you report it to the police?
Blogger KD said...
Alky can't think for himself.
Good catch again RRB.
yeah, it's especially rich when the asshole accuses you of plagiarism.
Post a Comment