Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Finally - A post that our liberal friends will agree with!

101 comments:

Myballs said...

Its remarkable how clean, washed and well fed all those migrants are. You'd think that a mass of people from poverty, having walked some fifty miles a day for two weeks would be just s little worse for wear.

And where do they all get their food and go to the bathroom?

Its almost like someone is financing and supporting them.

Anonymous said...



the weird thing about these types of videos is that republicans see them as parody and the left sees them as legitimate.

Anonymous said...

Good to have this brain dead socialist talking.
"This is a fact. This is not -- unlike some, I actually try to state facts. I believe in fact. All right? I believe in a fact-based reality. And, a fact-based politics. I don't believe in just making stuff up," former Pres. Obama says at a campaign rally. https://cbsn.ws/2NXHJ3b"

Anonymous said...

NBC reported they are 1500 miles from nearest US Border. 14 days till election. So they will walk 100 miles a day?

cowardly king obama said...

KD said...NBC reported they are 1500 miles from nearest US Border. 14 days till election. So they will walk 100 miles a day?

Amazing what people will do to vote.

commie said...

Anonymous Myballs said...
Its remarkable how clean, washed and well fed all those migrants are.

Of course they are....the D's are providing water food and money for these poor souls to walk 1500 miles barefoot and pregnant to save themselves along with the MS 13 gang bangers and thousands of arabs who went to Honduras so they could walk to the US kill innocents like you.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! So much stupidity in a small demure package.....idiot

commie said...

So they will walk 100 miles a day?

That's what trump is worried about with his NATIONAL EMERGENCY and idiots like you believe it.....another reason trump trolls weak minded dolts like you goat fucker...

caliphate4vr said...

Minnesota state Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-60B) currently leads the race to fill the federal House seat being vacated by Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN). Immediately after being elected to her current seat in 2016, Omar faced allegations -- soon backed by a remarkable amount of evidence -- that she had married her own brother in 2009, and was still legally his wife. They officially divorced in December 2017.

The motivation for the marriage remains unclear. However, the totality of the evidence points to possible immigration fraud and student loan fraud.

Rep. Omar has stated that she did marry "British citizen" Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, though the allegation that he is her brother is "absurd and offensive."

Below, exclusive new evidence -- from official archived high school records and corroborating sources -- strongly supports the claim that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi is indeed her brother.

As this implicates Rep. Omar in multiple state and federal felonies, I have contacted the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota to submit all other information uncovered during our investigation.

Myballs said...

Who said they were pregnant or barefoot you dumb fuck.

But my post stands.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Nationalist Party is the Trump renaissance of the John Birch Society party.

This is an assault upon the nation.

He is a traitorous liar.

Commonsense said...

Opiates.

Anonymous said...

MLB NO ONE KNEELING during the National Anthem.

Anonymous said...

Roger, TY for being a pussy.

cowardly king obama said...

Looks like Trump actually is just following in Obama's footsteps here"

“We simply cannot allow people to pour into the U.S., undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, lawfully to become immigrants in this country” — Barack Obama

Anonymous said...

The difference is o bimbo was all talk aka "no cattle , all bullshit".

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

No opiates or anything else but an honest analysis of the President who has become a Traitor.

Anonymous said...

Welcome to GA.
"Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams (D) is running on pledges to ban an entire category of firearms and repeal the campus carry law that allows concealed permit holders to be armed on campus for self-defense.

Abrams also wants to implement other gun controls, including universal background checks."

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Just heard Trump declare that he is a Nationalist, In 1938 wasn't there a German guy, who was a really big Nationalist?

Anonymous said...

Roger, he became a traitor @ 3 am Nov. 2016.
When he had the stones to beat the pant suit off of drunkard Hillbilly.

C.H. Truth said...

This is an assault upon the nation.

He is a traitorous liar.


Yes... imagine the gall of this guy. Wanting to put America and Americans first. Give them jobs, better wages, and all that nonsense.

What an assault on the nation.

caliphate4vr said...

, In 1938 wasn't there a German guy, who was a really big Nationalist?

Umm no genius, Austrian

Fuck you’re dumb to be a self proclaimed expert on history...

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb on Monday said he doesn’t buy President Donald Trump’s claim that the ongoing special counsel investigation is a “witch hunt.”

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing probe is investigating, among other things, whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to help its candidate win the 2016 presidential election.

Trump and his allies have repeatedly called the investigation a “witch hunt” and denied that there was collusion. The president has on a number of occasions floated the idea of firing Mueller.

Cobb, who stepped down from his post as White House lawyer in May, told host Gloria Borger at CNN’s CITIZEN Conference in New York on Monday that he rejects the president’s analysis of the probe. He also praised Mueller, who he said he has “respected” for decades.


“Bob Mueller is an American hero in my view,”
Cobb said during a panel with Jack Quinn, who served as White House lawyer under former President Bill Clinton. “He was a very serious prosecutor. He and I first met in the mid-’80s when we were prosecuting different places, and I have respected him throughout.”

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

His name was Adolf Hitler.

You flunked history.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Here's a look at some of the the president's latest false claims.

Migrant caravan

With conservative news outlets glued to a caravan of Central American migrants making their way north through Mexico toward the U.S. border, Trump suggested there is something more sinister than desperately poor families looking for a better life.

"Criminals and unknown Middle Easterners are mixed in," Trump tweeted on Monday.

Later, he repeated that unsubstantiated claim, telling White House reporters "you're going to find MS-13, you're going to find Middle Eastern. You're going to find everything. And guess what? We're not allowing them in our country. We want safety."

Reporters traveling with the caravan and the migrants themselves say they haven't seen any Middle Easterners in the group.

While it's not unheard of for people from the Middle East to try to cross the border illegally from Mexico, it is extremely rare. Of more than 300,000 people apprehended last year trying to cross the Southern border illegally, fewer than 100 came from countries in the Middle East, according to data gathered by Customs and Border Protection.

Tuesday afternoon the president acknowledged, after some back-and-forth with a reporter, that he had no proof there are Middle Easterners in the Central American caravan.

"There's no proof of anything," Trump said. But he insisted the migrants and illegal immigration in general pose a serious threat to the country.

"Certainly you have people coming up through the Southern border from the Middle East and other places that are not appropriate for our country," Trump said. "And I'm not letting them in."

Trump has promised to focus on hot-button issues like illegal immigration and the Supreme Court in the homestretch of this year's campaign season.

"This will be the election of the caravan, Kavanaugh, tax cuts, law and order, and common sense. That's what it is," Trump told supporters in Houston Monday night.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Tax cuts

Many mainstream Republicans thought they would be running this year on the strength of the big tax cut that Congress passed in 2017. But as time has passed, that tax cut has not worn very well. Maybe people aren't seeing a bump in their own take-home pay. Or perhaps they're worried about the federal deficit, which has ballooned as corporate tax revenues fell. Approval for the tax cut is hovering around 40 percent.

The president has been offering supporters a fix for this: another tax cut, this time directed at the middle class rather than those at the top of the income ladder.

"We're going to be putting in a 10 percent tax cut for middle-income families," Trump told supporters in Houston Monday. "It's going to be put in next week."

Whatever you might think of the merits of another tax cut, it's not going to happen next week as the president suggested. Congress is not even in session until after the election. Moreover, no one outside the White House seems to have much of an idea of what the president is talking about.

Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, who heads the tax-writing committee in the House, just smiled at reporters and offered a thumbs-up in Houston. Brady later issued a statement saying, "We will continue to work with the White House and Treasury over the coming weeks to develop an additional 10 percent tax cut."

Larry Kudlow, who directs the president's National Economic Council, conceded on Tuesday morning that Trump's timetable of acting next week may be overly ambitious.

"It may not surface for a while, but that's his goal," Kudlow said. "That's his policy intent. And I don't see anything wrong with that."

Trump — a political novice — has a history of promising quick results, then missing deadlines. The 10 percent tax cut appears to be a bit of political vaporware timed for the election and a tacit admission the actual tax cut Republicans passed last year isn't selling very well.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

We are going to see the deficit skyrocket.

We are going to see the impact as intrest rates rise. Wages are not increasing. The tarrifs are going to increase the costs of steel. Construction is going to be impacted negatively.

Mobs and jobs

The battle for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh energized Republicans, many of whom were offended by the outspoken protesters who repeatedly interrupted his confirmation hearings.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, complained the hearings had degenerated into "mob rule," and Trump has gleefully picked up that language.

"Democrats produce mobs. Republicans produce jobs," Trump told supporters on Monday.

This is a distillation of the president's exaggerated complaint that Democrats favor open borders, lawlessness and Venezuelan-style socialism.

While Senate Democrats almost unanimously opposed Kavanaugh's nomination, some — including the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinsten — seemed as frustrated by the protesters as were their Republican counterparts.

Many Democrats object to the president's get-tough border security and criminal justice policies as counterproductive. But they would reject the labels Trump tries to attach to them.

Finally, while job creation during Trump's first 20 months in office has been strong, it still trails the level of job creation during former President Barack Obama's last 20 months in office.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

FACT CHECK: President Trump's False Claims On Migrant Caravan, Tax Cuts https://n.pr/2OG7NoS

Anonymous said...

Alky doing stand up comedy.
Oh wait, alky are you serious?

Adolf Trump??

Anonymous said...

"“Yes, I’ve talked to some of them who have been deported … some of them, yes, have been deported,” Ramos said, going on:

The vast majority of these people are not criminals. They’re not terrorists. And they’re not even immigrants. They’re refugees. And as a nation in the United States, we have to choose what kind of nation we are and treat them with respect. We cannot pre-judge them. We cannot say all of them are criminals … that is not true. So what we have to do is listen to them, hear their cases, and if they deserve political asylum, then grant it to them.

Ramos’s claim that the migrants who are a part of the caravan are “refugees” is counter to what the migrants, themselves, have told the media. Although often described as asylum-seekers, the migrants admit that they are economic migrants who are looking for jobs.

Ramos said it is “not true” that the migrant caravan is invading the U.S., despite concerns from American citizens:

Despite the optics, I know that if you are in the United States and you are watching this you might think ‘Oh, we’re going to be invaded.’ That is not true. There is no invasion here. We’re talking about 7,000 right now, maybe a few thousand more that are trying to cross the border between Mexico and Guatemala. [Emphasis added]

Ramos has become a notorious open borders advocate with his support for human smuggling along the U.S.-Mexico border. Last year, Ramos declared that the U.S. belonged to Hispanic immigrants, not American citizens."



caliphate4vr said...


Anonymous caliphate4vr said...
, In 1938 wasn't there a German guy, who was a really big Nationalist?

Umm no genius, Austrian


Blogger Roger Amick said...
His name was Adolf Hitler.

You flunked history.


No liver, you did, Adolph was Austrian

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

I knew that Hitler was Austrian

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

His birth location was meaningless. He was German when he assumed power.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You believed that Obama was born in Kenya because Trump told you so.

caliphate4vr said...

Cray cray, returns

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Paul you should cut down on the beer.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

I have a feeling about the high turnout in the early voting states.

The enthusiasm among Democrats and Independents and Republicans is higher than average by far. The demographics favor the Democrats but it is far too early to just to any consensus.

The Fake News anti American New York Times reported

Early voting for the midterm elections has begun in states across the country, and enthusiasm — and voter turnout — both appear to be high, with hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots arriving in Florida and voters lining up around the block in Texas.

Turnout has surged among Republicans, Democrats and independents, according to poll data. As of Tuesday afternoon, more than seven million people had voted early, according to data compiled by Michael McDonald, a professor of political science at the University of Florida who studies elections.

“If these patterns persist, we could see a turnout rate at least equaling the turnout rate in 1966, which was 48 percent, and if we beat that then you have to go all the way back to 1914, when the turnout rate was 51 percent,” he said. “We could be looking at a turnout rate that virtually no one has ever experienced.”

Commonsense said...

Intresting pattern in Florida. The GOP is outperforming Democrats in early voting. It's usually the other way around.

commie said...

Which asshole posted the BS about Sherrod Brown yesterday and was adamant that the allegations were being ignored because he was a D??????? Who was that CH?????

In Ohio, Representative Jim Renacci, the Republican who is trying to unseat Senator Sherrod Brown, told the editorial board of The Cincinnati Enquirer that “multiple women” had contacted him to say that they had been assaulted by Brown between 1987 and 2004. Renacci offered no names, no details, no way for anyone to look into the matter. He just dropped the bomb and moved on.

Seems to me, someone made up the charges and moved on.....so sad our esteemed host has been proven to be a gullible trump fellator with no moral compass....just like donnie.....so sad that america is being run slipshod by our entertainer in chief whose idea of truth is what ever he says.....

Commonsense said...

Yes, but you must believe the women. That's how it works now.

commie said...

Democrats in early voting. It's usually the other way around.

Horseshit asshole....

Republicans mailing in more ballots than Democrats; Lee County is...
www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2018/10/17/republicans-mailing-in-more-ballots-than-democrats-lee-county-is-no-1/
6 days ago ... Republicans have consistently outperformed Democrats in voter turnout in ... This is the first election in Florida in which early voting will be .

Try again cramps....I've been posting about R tactics in floridauh for years now....this is just the latest incarnation....

commie said...

That's how it works now.

And why do you think it shouldn't?????

Commonsense said...

I have a feeling about the high turnout in the early voting states.

Maalox might help.

GOP shows new strength in early voting, as midterm fight for control tightens

Early voting numbers from several key battleground states now show Republican voters turning out in far greater numbers than Democratic ones, signaling an initial GOP surge that may dull the prospects of a so-called "blue wave" on Nov. 6.

Republican voters have taken the lead in turnout numbers in Georgia, Indiana, Montana, Texas, Tennessee, Florida and Arizona -- states that Fox News analyses show are the scenes of close and pivotal House, Senate and gubernatorial races.

The results are most striking in Tennessee, where 63 percent of early voters are affiliated with the Republican Party, compared to only 30 percent aligned with the Democrats, according to a review of publicly available voting data conducted by NBC News.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Fox News is as credible as Alex Jones.

commie said...

My ballz the idiot asked...
Who said they were pregnant or barefoot you dumb fuck.

But my post stands.

I did.....just like your asshattery post of wondering where they shit....as far as I am concerned, they should shit in your yard when they get here....fucking idiot....And if you followed the news and saw the reporting, you would have seen many walking barefoot carrying infants.....you dumb bigoted asshole!!!! No wonder why you are an R,.....too stupid for words...LOL

Commonsense said...

And why do you think it shouldn't?????

So you believe the accusations?

There is this American value about due process and presumption of innocents. But after all it's only a job interview right?

commie said...

states that Fox News analyses show are the scenes of close and pivotal House, Senate and gubernatorial races.

Menstal pins his hopes on fake news and its unbiased analysis.....the early voting in GA is peaking around the Atl metro area.....and guess who they support????

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

How about Sean Trende? He's a conservative but sometimes has a working brain.

Early Voting a Poor Predictor of Final Results
By Sean Trende
November 02, 2016

As we wind down this election, we begin to hear the familiar chime: The election is over and/or can be predicted because of what we see in the early vote. Don’t buy it. While we might be able to make some broad projections based upon early voting – maybe – we’re more likely to substitute our own judgments and arbitrary intuitions for actual results.

There are (at least) three reasons this it true. The first is theoretical. We can think of an election result as accurately represented by the following equation: The Democrats’ share of the vote is equal to the Democrats’ share of the early vote times the number of early votes, plus the Democrats’ share of the Election Day vote times the number of Election Day votes.


Even if you don’t have a math degree, you should be able to intuit the gist of the problem: We are missing two of the four variables for the equation, and guessing at a third. All we really know is the number of early votes cast.

Now we might be able to get a sense of how Democrats are performing in the early vote by looking at African-American turnout or overall Democratic turnout (in states with partisan registration), but we can’t know how independents are voting. We might make assumptions about this by looking at public polling, but then what value are we adding beyond what the public polling says? Plus we’re incorporating the error margins of public polling into our estimates, which will be even greater for demographic subsamples.

The real problem with this, however – and this is true with a lot of early voting analysis – is that for any of this to work we have to assume that the early vote is somehow representative of the Election Day vote in order to fill in the second half of the equation. The problem is, it isn’t. Research suggests that the early vote tends to be comprised of more partisan, higher propensity voters. In the most recent elections, they have often skewed Democratic, most likely as a side effect of increased Democratic emphasis on early voting (compare this with Donald Trump, who has been telling his supporters to vote on Election Day).

So basically, we’re left without really knowing how the early voting electorate is voting, without knowing how the Election Day electorate is likely to vote, and without knowing the size of the Election Day electorate. More importantly, we don’t know the effect to which campaign strategy is creating the appearance of a participation surge by merely cannibalizing Election Day voters by mobilizing voters who would have voted on Election Day anyway. This is a problem.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Second, predictions from early voting have a decidedly mixed track record. As University of Denver political scientist Seth Masket has suggested, the relationship between early voting results and Election Day results is pretty weak. That isn’t to say it is non-existent, but we should probably expect some type of relationship between the partisan split of early votes and the state as a whole (that is, we’d expect more Democrats to vote early and on Election Day in Maryland than, say, Utah.) A contradictory report has been published at the Monkey Cage blog, but that finds a relationship utilizing proprietary Catalist data, not the publicly available data from which everyone is presently extrapolating.

But if predictions from 2012 were iffy, predictions from 2010 and 2014 were awful. In 2010, analysts saw huge Democratic advantages in turnout in places such as Ohio and Iowa and thought that perhaps there was no enthusiasm gap in the election. In 2014, it was widely assumed that early vote totals were good news for Democrats in states including North Carolina and Iowa; Thom Tillis ended up winning in North Carolina on the back of strong Election Day turnout, while the 2014 Iowa Senate race was decidedly not close (as early vote analysts had suggested); Joni Ernst won by almost 10 points.

Third, given the lack of scientific rigor in a lot of these projections, analysts can easily fall into the trap of filling that gap with their own assumptions. As I wrote in 2014:

Humans are remarkably adept at discovering and using patterns. We don’t like chaos, and this is part of what has allowed us to advance as a species. Yet our minds aren’t precisely fine-tuned to patterns; we’re overly sensitive, and so we see dragons in clouds, a man’s face on the moon, and images of Mary in a grilled cheese sandwich. If I gave you a page with 15 dots and challenged you to fill in the gaps with what you saw, you’d probably come back with a picture of a Dimetrodon (or at least, that’s what I’d be inclined to draw) or some such; you wouldn’t likely return the page and tell me it is just random noise.

We do the same thing with data. We do it in very obviously bad ways – there was a cottage industry of predicting presidential elections based on the winner of the final Redskins football game from 1932 to 2004 (there’s actually a statistically significant correlation between the margins of those games and the margin of presidential elections during this time).

But it’s most dangerous when we have good reason to believe there has to be a pattern.

To see an example of this, consider North Carolina, where early voting patterns are frequently cited as good news for Democrats. You can certainly make that argument. But consider the counterargument, using these data from Dr. Michael Bitzer. Early voting turnout is up somewhat from 2012, but does that suggest heightened turnout or not? The trend in North Carolina has been toward voters shifting from Election Day voting to early voting for quite some time. Perhaps voters have continued to shift from Election Day voting, and overall turnout is off quite a bit.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/11/02/early_voting_a_poor_predictor_of_final_results.amp.html

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

My view is that the higher the turnout the more the odds favor the Democrats. The changing demographic patterns are in favor of the Democrats because they outnumber Republicans. Especially among independents.

The statehouse changes are signaling a leftward trend.

Anonymous said...

The Border control Union Backs President Trump and called it an "Invation", said calling it a "caravan" was nonsence..

commie said...


The Border control Union Backs President Trump and called it an "Invation"

And I call you a goat fucking asshole......seems neither matters....jag off

Commonsense said...

So Roger you don't have any feeling about early voting now?

I'm not as sophisticated as Sean but at least I do know a couple things about Florida.

1. Democrats always outperformed Republicans in early voting but Republicans bury Democrats on Election Day.
2. If Republican stay true to form on Election Day Democrats will really get buried.

Anonymous said...

Alky, have you accounted for the Hispanic and Black Voters moving to Trump?

Jobs over mobs.

Anonymous said...


guys like bartlett and the alky have been so consumed by TDS they have now begun to praise hitler in comparison to trump.



Bruce Bartlett


@BruceBartlett
Follow Follow @BruceBartlett
More

Key differences between Donald Trump and Adolph Hitler--Hitler served honorably in the military, Trump didn't; Hitler was faithful to his wife, Trump cheated on all his wives; Hitler wrote a book, Trump's were all ghostwritten.

10:34 AM - 23 Oct 2018
922 Retweets 2,552 Likes NEOAethyrBodhi the BostonStephen HughesSpaceman🇰🇪🇸🇮FLIZZYEuropean Friendb leighTara TRex 🦖♥️🦖mhaeberli
6,629 replies 922 retweets 2,552 likes
Reply 6.6K Retweet 922 Like 2.6K


https://twitter.com/BruceBartlett/status/1054788112193331200

Anonymous said...

As Unions continue to move to Trump.

This is timely.
"The Border control Union Backs President Trump and called it an "Invation"

Anonymous said...




The changing demographic patterns are in favor of the Democrats because they outnumber Republicans.


tell us again alky how many 0linsky voters voted for trump in 2016.

changing demographics. LOL.

commie said...

As Unions continue to move to Trump.

As a single union run by trump moves toward mass stupidity......yep goat fucker.....that is a ringing endorsement for idiots like you...

Anonymous said...

"Single Union"

Oh oh Denise.

"May 24, 2018 · President Donald Trump won praise from UAW President Dennis Williams, who said Thursday that American workers want current trade policy changed and like the idea of new tariffs on foreign cars. ... Williams, one of the country's top leaders in organized labor, said Trump is echoing ..."

commie said...

You have trouble with the written word goat fucker.....winning praise is not a union moving toward trump or an endorsement.....just another fellator sucking.....just like you..sooo much fun kicking your old white ass again and again....LOLOLOL.

Anonymous said...

Oh how little those on the left know.

"
SubscribeAFL-CIO leader Richard Trumka offers qualified support for Trump's trade policies
 USA TODAY | 3:19 pm EDT August 1, 2018

   

WASHINGTON – The head of the country’s largest federation of labor unions offered qualified praise Wednesday for President Donald Trump’s trade policies but questioned the administration’s approach to levying tariffs.


“I think he’s going in the right direction on trade,” said Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO."

Commonsense said...

All I know is that if I'm a pollester who base my likely voter model on the assumption that Democrat will outperform Republicans in turnout, then I would be real nervous right now.

commie said...

Gee whiz goat fornicator....your brilliant post above is almost 5 months old....an eternity in this day and age....think things may have changed just a little???? so sad you are soooo fucking stupid...

commie said...


“I think he’s going in the right direction on trade,”

The rest of the story....trumka is not a trump endorser or sycophant, asshole


WASHINGTON – The head of the country’s largest federation of labor unions offered qualified praise Wednesday for President Donald Trump’s trade policies but questioned the administration’s approach to levying tariffs.

“I think he’s going in the right direction on trade,” said Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO.

International trade is a vital part of the U.S. economy, but powerful corporate interests and secret negotiations have led to trade rules that “stacked the deck” for large corporations at the expense of working people, Trumka told reporters at a breakfast roundtable sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor.

Keep digging you and get back tp me when they endorse trump.....goat fucker

Commonsense said...

The changing demographic patterns are in favor of the Democrats because they outnumber Republicans.

As in 2016 the fatal flaw in this theory is the assumption these "demographic groups" will always vote for the Democrat. It is why Hillary's losing came as a shock to them when everybody else could see it coming.

On Fox there was a coliumist who made a convincing case that suburban women will vote for the Republican this cycle. Her main argument was that these women may not like Trump personally but they like his results.

The reason Trump won in 2016 was because enough women did exactly that and nothing since would have changed their mind. In fact they would be more convince they made the right choice.

commie said...

Her main argument was that these women may not like Trump personally but they like his results.

Opinions are like assholes....everyone has one.....the current polls show women prefer D's by 20+ Me thinks you are grabbing at straws......LOL especially using fake news as a reliable and unbiased source.....

Commonsense said...

If you are polling women in Brooklyn +20 doesn't mean very much.

Commonsense said...

And again it shows why national polls, especially the generic ballot poll is next to useless in perdicting what is going to happen.

It shows greater enthusiasm for Democrats but that enthusiasm is wasted in solid Democrat districts. It doesn't matter whether you win by 51 percent or 90% you still only elect one representative in that district.

What matters are the swing districts and here it is far closer.

Commonsense said...

Like I said you are going to here a lot of Democrat whining about gerrymandering after the election but it is really all their fault.

They were the ones who decided to forsake the middle class in the heartland in favor of the hipsters in the urban centers on the coasts.

They decide to ignore electoral math and have narrow base extremist party.

Anonymous said...




the "demographics is destiny" argument turned out to be bullshit at around the same time the alky was crowing that the GOP would be wandering in the wilderness for at least a generation...

...which also turned out to be total bullshit.

there's a political rule that has been formulating over the past few election cycles; at least since bush v. kerry, that i would refer to as:

"the alky constant."

whatever the alky declares to be true in the realm of politics, the exact opposite is true.



Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Mob rule.

FBI New York, the Secret Service and the New Castle Police Department are investigating what is being described as an “improvised explosive device” found near the house belonging to Bill and Hillary Clinton in Chappaqua, New York.

Anonymous said...



a fake "bomb" was also sent to 0linsky, alky.

geezus. i can tell how desperate you guys are becoming this close to the election to be pulling charade shit like this. and consider how unnecessary it is, because demographics.



cowardly king obama said...

a fake "bomb" was also sent to 0linsky, alky.

geezus. i can tell how desperate you guys are becoming this close to the election to be pulling charade shit like this. and consider how unnecessary it is, because demographics.


I was thinking the same thing. Liberals regularly stage these type of things hoping to stir up some outrage. More likely it's just democrats shooting themselves in the foot again. A daily occurrence.

Keep it up and we may actually have a red wave soon...

Anonymous said...




make sure you re-tweet this alky. trump agrees with 0linsky 100%!





Donald J. Trump

Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More

I agree with President Obama 100%!

4:18 PM - 23 Oct 2018

63,896 Retweets 176,628 Likes Barbara JonesChris CasellaWire To WireCJCCedar SeubertDrewTomElla WheelerDestry Suthers
18,171 replies 63,896 retweets 176,628 likes
Reply 18K Retweet 64K Like 177K

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1054874705491120133

COMMIE said...

Blogger Commonsense said...
If you are polling women in Brooklyn +20 doesn't mean very much.

I am sure you think that means something.....LOLOLOL

Myballs said...

Mob rule.

Instead of mailing packages, maybe whoever is doing it can just go out into the street with masks and bats.

Anonymous said...



Instead of mailing packages, maybe whoever is doing it can just go out into the street with masks and bats.


indeed. especially since they're the same folks.

commie said...

whoever is doing it can just go out into the street with masks and bats.

You mean like those asshole white supremacists did in virginia???? The good nazi's there wore KKK garb...a real fashion statement for trump and people like you numb nutz....LOL

Myballs said...

Package also sent to whitehouse.

Democrat mob.

Gee roger, isn't it do easy to do this?

Anonymous said...



THIS is CNN...


The U.S. Secret Service said Wednesday that reports of a suspicious package addressed to the White House are "incorrect."

"CLARIFICATION: At this time the Secret Service has intercepted TWO suspicious packages - one in NY and one in D.C. Reports of a third intercepted package addressed to the WH are incorrect," the agency wrote in a post on Twitter.
Earlier in the day, CNN reported that a package apparently containing a pipe bomb that was addressed to the White House was intercepted on Wednesday, citing a law enforcement official. CNN apparently took down their report



https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/24/pipe-bomb-addressed-to-the-white-house-is-intercepted-cnn.html?__source=twitter%7Cmain

Commonsense said...

When you advocate violence against your political opponents it will always blow back at you.

Yes the person who did this should be in jail for the rest of their lives but is it any surprise after the Democrats turned up the violent rhetoric?

Anonymous said...

"the alky constant." ®

whatever the alky declares to be true in the realm of politics, the exact opposite is true" RRB

Anonymous said...




according to anonymous sources close to the situation, officials at MSDNC are "extremely disappointed" that they have not been targeted in these fake bomb attacks.

an anonymous MSDNC senior executive is quoted as saying - "look, nobody, and i mean NOBODY carries more water for the left than us. that we have not been targeted by a fake bomb is an OUTRAGE."

commie said...

best of their lives but is it any surprise after the Democrats turned up the violent rhetoric?

Sure cramps...how convenient you forget the body slamming montana asshole trump praised...Or the guy he promised to pay his legal bills for if he beat a protester up.....Or the locke her up champs or there are good nazi's while people were killed....yeah those dem's deserve to be beat on.....asshole

Anonymous said...

Old white rant by Fatty.

Anonymous said...




i'm curious -

the fake bomb sent to the clinton's... was it supposed to target bill or hillary? the reason i ask is that they're never at the house at the same time.

caliphate4vr said...

Second migrant caravan in Guatemala heads toward Mexico

Don't let them cross. If they get across treat them like the marielitos and warehouse them at National Guard bases in Montana, Idaho, North Dakota it'll be cold soon

Anonymous said...


If they get across treat them like the marielitos and warehouse them at National Guard bases in Montana, Idaho, North Dakota it'll be cold soon


exactly.

we could use a new round of stars on "life below zero."

heh.

Anonymous said...

"the alky constant." ®

The " bomb " was never near the house of Bill or Hillary Clinton.
Wrong again.

Anonymous said...

"
we could use a new round of stars on "life below zero."
I love that show and "The last Alaskans" and "Mountain Men".

Anonymous said...

Oh really.
"On Tuesday’s “CNN Tonight,” National Democratic Redistricting Committee Chairman and former Attorney General Eric Holder stated, “with regard to gerrymandering and voter suppression, you are seeing a minority in this country taking power that is not legitimately theirs.”

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

He ducked the issue

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Breitbart News

commie said...


He ducked the issue

Shocking!!!! And the excuses continue while trump breeds discord and hate....But, that's okay since that is all he ever did in his life.....such a douche...

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The President has been saying that the FBI/DOJ practice partisan investigations.

He has been saying that the free press is the enemy of the country.

He said that Obama and crooked Hillary Clinton were the founders of ISIS.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

He said in three sentences he was going to investigate the bombing attempts.

Then said the he is worried about the opioid epidemic crisis.

Anonymous said...




He said in three sentences he was going to investigate the bombing attempts.


so roger,

what you're saying is that you're upset that trump said in three sentences what it would've taken 0linsky a 45 minute speech and two teleprompters to say.

okey dokey.

cowardly king obama said...

John Hawkins‏Verified account @johnhawkinsrwn

I oppose sending bombs to people I disagree with politically. Or shooting them on a softball field. Or sending them Ricin. Or throwing rocks through their windows. Or Jumping them 5 on 1 in the street. Or assaulting them in their front yards. Or screaming at them in restaurants.


Glad the president realizes how much bigger than this the opioid crisis is, how many are killed each year?

Anonymous said...

Roger Amick said...

The President has been saying that the FBI/DOJ practice partisan investigations.

He has been saying that the free press is the enemy of the country.

He said that Obama and crooked Hillary Clinton were the founders of ISIS.



upped the opioid dosage today, eh alky?

be careful with that shit. if you crash that walker, mail order might not be able to prop you back up.

commie said...

upped the opioid dosage today, eh alky?

Hey rectum breath.....why don't you prove those statements wrong........you can't as you swallow another load of trumps manhood like the good little asshole you are....I won't hold my breath little man.....

Anonymous said...

"He said in three sentences he was going to investigate the bombing attempts. 

Then said the he is worried about the opioid epidemic crisis. "

Good job Mr. President.
To the point, non-political .

commie said...

Old white rant by Fatty.

Hows your portfolio goat fucker....bet you took a big hit something you cannot afford....LOLOLOL

with regard to gerrymandering and voter suppression, you are seeing a minority in this country taking power that is not legitimately theirs.”

A lot of truth to that.....unlike your lying asshole in chief.....