ABC News' Jonathan Karl on Mueller's upcoming report: "People who are closest to what Mueller has been doing, interacting with the special counsel, caution me that this report is almost certain to be anti-climactic." pic.twitter.com/DkFWGKNJyi— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) January 13, 2019
33 comments:
Almost every single person except for you.
You obviously climax every time you see him lie .
I would vote for him against Trump by changing my party on the California ballot system.
GOP's John Kasich is looking to join CNN or MSNBC amid speculation he could run for president in 2020
Brian Schwartz | @schwartzbCNBC
Published 7 Hours Ago Updated 3 Hours Ago
CNBC.com
Republican John Kasich, who is thinking about running for president in 2020, is likely to announce this week that he will join a major cable news network.
Kasich has signaled to close advisors and some donors that he is looking to sign with either CNN or MSNBC as he finishes his two-term tenure as Ohio's governor, according to three people with knowledge of the conversations.
Kasich signed with United Talent Agency, the firm announced Monday.
Gov. John Kasich (R-Ohio) appears on 'Meet the Press' in Washington, D.C., Sunday, March 12, 2017.
William B. Plowman | NBCUniversal | Getty Images
Gov. John Kasich (R-Ohio) appears on 'Meet the Press' in Washington, D.C., Sunday, March 12, 2017.
Republican John Kasich, who is thinking about running for president in 2020, is likely to announce as soon as this week that he will join a major cable news network, CNBC has learned.
Kasich has signaled to close advisors and some donors that he is looking to sign with either CNN or MSNBC as he finishes his two-term tenure as Ohio's governor, according to three people with knowledge of the conversations, including two who have been close to the governor since his 2016 presidential run.
These people would not say the role Kasich will play at a network, only to say that he's ruled out joining Fox News Channel. Kasich hosted his own show on Fox News for several years in the 2000s.
rrb's best friend is getting stripped of his seats in the house of representatives.
House Republican leaders removed Representative Steve King of Iowa from the Judiciary and Agriculture Committees on Monday night as party officials scrambled to appear tough on racism and contain damage from comments Mr. King made to The New York Times questioning why white supremacy is considered offensive.
Why don't you post the YouTube videos of the President not answering questions on his business with the Russians. If you want seek the truth, you would let us to decide whether he was telling the truth, or not. But you have kept us from posting the real coldheartedtruth, because Sean Hannity didn't like my posts.
The Republicans have made the best decision for years!
Republican leaders have stripped Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) of all of his committee assignments for the current Congress following a new wave of outcry over the lawmaker’s vast history of white supremacist viewpoints and racist rhetoric.
“We will not be seating Steve King on any committees in the 116th Congress,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Monday after a meeting of the GOP Steering Committee. The decision was unanimous.
King lambasted his removal in a statement released late Monday, saying, “McCarthy’s decision to remove me from committees is a political decision that ignores the truth.”
“I never worked for Russia,”
"I never had sex with that woman."
Mr. Barr said that the investigation should be allowed to continue. I had confidence he would handle the situation properly, I still have confidence to handle the matter properly. I still have that confidence today."
This is the first time that a sitting President has been under investigation for being an agent for a foreign power.
The counter intelligence service was alarmed by the behavior of the President of the United States. This has never happened before.
“I never worked for Russia,”
"I never had sex with that woman."
"I am not a crook."
Two out three were historical comments that lead to the impeachment of the President.
None of them were under oath when they made the remarks.
Next we will see changes of supporting child molesters.
Roger Kimball has an interesting article,' Watergate by any other name'. Zeroes in on the Obama administration criminal deep state:
Michael Hayden
James Coney
Andrew McCabe
Lisa Page
Peter Strzok
Susan Rice
Sally Yates
James Brennan
James Clapper
I hope bill Barr properly goes after them.
You are out of your mind.
Familiarity, it is said, breeds contempt. It also breeds indifference. For almost three years now, the intelligence services and police apparatus of the deep state have worked tirelessly to undermine Donald Trump. Beginning sometime in the late winter of 2016, when Trump’s presidential campaign was showing unexpected signs of strength, John Brennan—the Communist-voting apparatchik turned media mouthpiece whom it pleased Barack Obama to appoint as director of the CIA—began ringing alarm bells about Trump’s possible relations with the Kremlin. His concern was based on two things. One was a report, spurious as it turned out, about “contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons that raised concerns in my mind about whether or not those individuals were cooperating with the Russians.” The other was that brittle sense of entitlement, fired by paranoia, that membership in the higher echelons of the deep state’s nomenklatura breeds.
Brennan convened a “working group” at CIA headquarters that included Peter Strzok, the disgraced FBI agent who was head of counter-intelligence, and James Clapper, then director of national intelligence (now, like Brennan, another mouthpiece for the left-wing media), in order to stymie Trump’s campaign. It was Brennan, too, who first alerted James Comey, the disgraced former director of the F.B.I., to the fantasy of possible “collusion” between the Trump Campaign and “the Russians.”
This is where Scott gets his ideas.
https://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/watergate-by-any-other-name/
The federal government spent millions of dollars investigating a hoax. Somebody should go to jail.
In my life, I have watched John Kennedy talk on television about missiles in Cuba. I saw Lyndon Johnson look Richard Russell squarely in the eye and and say, "And we shall overcome." I saw Richard Nixon resign and Gerald Ford tell the Congress that our long national nightmare was over. I saw Jimmy Carter talk about malaise and Ronald Reagan talk about a shining city on a hill. I saw George H.W. Bush deliver the eulogy for the Soviet bloc, and Bill Clinton comfort the survivors of Timothy McVeigh's madness in Oklahoma City. I saw George W. Bush struggle to make sense of it all on September 11, 2001, and I saw Barack Obama sing "Amazing Grace" in the wounded sanctuary of Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston, South Carolina.
These were the presidents of my lifetime. These were not perfect men. They were not perfect presidents, god knows. Not one of them was that. But they approached the job, and they took to the podium, with all the gravitas they could muster as appropriate to the job. They tried, at least, to reach for something in the presidency that was beyond their grasp as ordinary human beings. They were not all ennobled by the attempt, but they tried nonetheless.
And comes now this hopeless, vicious buffoon, and the audience of equally hopeless and vicious buffoons who laughed and cheered when he made sport of a woman whose lasting memory of the trauma she suffered is the laughter of the perpetrators. Now he comes, a man swathed in scandal, with no interest beyond what he can put in his pocket and what he can put over on a universe of suckers, and he does something like this while occupying an office that we gave him, and while endowed with a public trust that he dishonors every day he wakes up in the White House.
The scion of a multigenerational criminal enterprise, the parameters of which we are only now beginning to comprehend. A vessel for all the worst elements of the American condition. And a cheap, soulless bully besides. Watch him again, behind the seal of the President of the United States. Isn't he a funny man? Isn't what happened to that lady hilarious? Watch the assembled morons cheer. This is the only story now."
– Charles Pierce is the creator of this letter. Pass it on spread the word. Very well said.
"I never worked for Russia,”
"I never had sex with that woman."
"I am not a crook."
What a fucking snob he is. He holds utter contempt for Americans.
Only the second one is statement is the lie. The first and last statements are true.
good job alky. you managed to destroy yet another thread.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
rrb's best friend is getting stripped of his seats in the house of representatives.
projecting again alky?
heh.
yours is the party of the klan and robert byrd and george wallace.
king didn't get stripped of his house seat, you moron. only his committee posts. if he had any honor he would just go ahead and make it official and become a democrat.
holy shit. this is horrifying. one can only imagine the damage done at the time by allowing himself to meet privately with, and to be manipulated by such a treacherous foreign leader...
Meetings at Soviet Mission
Mr. Reagan and Mr. Gorbachev began their second day of talks with a private meeting that had been scheduled to last 15 minutes but ran for nearly 70 minutes, with only interpreters present. They met in a small room in the Soviet Mission, with the Soviet leader seated in a small armchair and Mr. Reagan on a sofa.
In the afternoon, they meet alone for a little over 20 minutes and then again for 90 minutes. All told, the two leaders have spent 4 hours and 51 minutes alone, except for interpreters, over the two days here.
https://www.nytimes.com/1985/11/21/world/reagan-continues-private-meetinfs-with-gorbachev.html
and while it wasn't successful, thank goodness democrats had the foresight to send ted kennedy to moscow to collude with the russians in an attempt to prevent reagan's reelection. that was prescient.
WASHINGTON — There are few things that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia desires more than the weakening of NATO, the military alliance among the United States, Europe and Canada that has deterred Soviet and Russian aggression for 70 years.
Last year, President Trump suggested a move tantamount to destroying NATO: the withdrawal of the United States.
Senior administration officials told The New York Times that several times over the course of 2018, Mr. Trump privately said he wanted to withdraw from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Current and former officials who support the alliance said they feared Mr. Trump could return to his threat as allied military spending continued to lag behind the goals the president had set.
In the days around a tumultuous NATO summit meeting last summer, they said, Mr. Trump told his top national security officials that he did not see the point of the military alliance, which he presented as a drain on the United States.
At the time, Mr. Trump’s national security team, including Jim Mattis, then the defense secretary, and John R. Bolton, the national security adviser, scrambled to keep American strategy on track without mention of a withdrawal that would drastically reduce Washington’s influence in Europe and could embolden Russia for decades.
Now, the president’s repeatedly stated desire to withdraw from NATO is a gift to Vladimir Putin.
"I didn't work with the Russians."
He is acting as an assistant to a hostile foreign nation.
This is the reason why the FBI initiated the investigation into the President.
Trump Discussed Pulling U.S. From NATO, Aides Say Amid New Concerns Over Russia https://nyti.ms/2HaZZrK
American voters support 63 - 30 percent a Democratic proposal to reopen parts of the government that do not involve border security while negotiating funding for the Wall, according to a Quinnipiac University National Poll released today. Every party, gender, education, age and racial group supports this idea except Republicans, who are opposed 52 - 39 percent.
Voters oppose 63 - 32 percent shutting down the government to force funding for the Wall, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University National Poll finds. Again, Republicans are the only listed group supporting the shutdown, 67 - 24 percent.
The GOP is losing the battle as 56 percent of American voters say President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are responsible for the shutdown, while 36 percent say Democrats are responsible.
Voters remain solidly opposed to a wall on the Mexican border, 55 - 43 percent, and reject every argument for the Wall. The 55 - 43 percent opposition compares to 54 - 43 percent opposition in a December 18 survey, just before the partial government shutdown.
American voters are negative in every question about the wall, saying:
59 - 40 percent that it is not a good use of taxpayer dollars;
55 - 43 percent that the wall would not make the U.S. safer;
59 - 40 percent that the wall is not necessary to protect the border;
52 percent say the wall is against American values as 41 percent say the wall is consistent with American values.
There is a security crisis along the Mexican border, American voters say 54 - 43 percent, and voters say 68 - 26 percent there is a humanitarian crisis.
"'Mr. President, it's on you,' voters say about the government shutdown, blaming President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans more than Democrats," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
"And while they believe there is both a humanitarian and a security crisis along the southern border, they absolutely don't think a wall will solve the problem," Malloy added.
American voters support 61 - 32 percent a bill to fund new border security measures without funding the Wall. Republicans are the only listed group opposed to this idea, 57 - 36 percent.
President Trump's TV address to the nation last week was "mostly misleading," 49 percent of American voters say, while 32 percent say it was "mostly accurate."
Voters are divided on the response by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer as 38 percent found it "mostly accurate" and 39 percent found it "mostly misleading."
American voters believed Pelosi/Schumer more than Trump 46 - 36 percent, including 48 - 33 percent among independent voters.
Only 2 percent of voters say the TV address changed their mind, while 89 percent say it did not change their mind about building the Wall.
"When it comes to the televised arguments for and against the need for a border wall, President Donald Trump flunks the fact meter, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer don't fare much better," Malloy said.
Voters disapprove 65 - 32 percent of President Trump using emergency executive powers to fund the Wall.
By a narrow 49 - 44 percent American voters trust Democrats in Congress more than Trump on the issue of border security.
Voters say 63 - 29 percent that undocumented immigrants are not more likely than American citizens to commit crimes.
American voters say 73 - 16 percent, including 57 - 28 percent among Republicans, that immigration is good for the country.
From January 9 - 13, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,209 voters nationwide with a margin of error of +/- 3.3 percentage points, including the design effect.
The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts gold standard surveys using random digit dialing with live interviewers calling landlines and cell phones. The Quinnipiac University Poll conducts nationwide surveys and polls in more than a dozen states on national and statewide elections, as well as public policy issues.
Visit poll.qu.edu or www.facebook.com/quinnipiacpoll
President Trump's TV address to the nation last week was "mostly misleading," 49 percent of American voters say, while 32 percent say it was "mostly accurate."
Voters are divided on the response by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer as 38 percent found it "mostly accurate" and 39 percent found it "mostly misleading."
American voters believed Pelosi/Schumer more than Trump 46 - 36 percent, including 48 - 33 percent among independent voters.
For decades, politicians promised to secure the border, fix our trade deals, bring back our factories, get tough on China, move the Embassy to Jerusalem, make NATO pay their fair share, and so much else - only to do NOTHING (or worse)....
....I am doing exactly what I pledged to do, and what I was elected to do by the citizens of our great Country. Just as I promised, I am fighting for YOU!
"I didn't work with the Russians."
He is acting as an assistant to a hostile foreign nation.
This is the reason why the FBI initiated the investigation into the President.
Not because of political bias in the FBI.
President Trump rejects a plan to pause the shutdown
The president said on Monday that he had turned down a proposal by Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina to reopen the government for about three weeks to jump-start talks with Democrats.
Mr. Trump also said he didn’t want the impasse over $5.7 billion that he has demanded for a wall on the southwestern border to continue, but it wasn’t clear what he saw as an alternative.
Reaction: Polls show that a majority of Americans blame Mr. Trump and his party for the partial government shutdown, now in its fourth week. But among Republican voters, support for a wall is growing.
The effects: The number of transportation security officers who aren’t showing up to work without pay keeps rising, leading to the closing of some airport checkpoints and longer wait times for travelers on Monday.
Republican voters, support for a wall is growing.
Independents are not supporting his wall.
There is a growing concern about the President and his impulsive behavior.
There are more anonymous sources from within the White House emerging every day.
I suspect that Kelly and others who have been leaving the administration are the sources of the new stories about the President are speaking out.
"Mr. Gorbachev tear down your wall."
"I never worked for Russia,”
Reagan is rolling in his grave.
How the President wants the government employees who can't pay the mortgage to address the problem.
"Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onion on a sesame seed bun."
Blogger Roger Amick said...
“I never worked for Russia,”
"I never had sex with that woman."
"I am not a crook."
Two out three were historical comments that lead to the impeachment of the President.
Andre Jackson said, I am not a crook?
Only he and Bubba have been impeached oh great studier of history
.
Idiot
Post a Comment