Let's be clear here folks!
If the Democrats thought things were going well and thought they stood a prayer in hell of any of this actually working, then they wouldn't lower themselves to demanding that the President committed an act of obstruction because he tweeted something negative about a
But after just two days, this is going so badly that the new rumors are that many Democrats are considering whether they would be better NOT taking a vote on impeachment, but rather simply voting to "censure" the President for his actions. That way (the logic goes) the issue does not have to go to the Senate, where the President will be acquitted allowing Trump to demand he was exonerated and go on a big victory dance tour. But, of course, the President cannot be "aquitted" of a censure vote in the Senate. This would leave Democrats in the house with "some last word" and might allow them to save a little face.
But the hard reality for Democrats is that an actual impeachment vote would create a situation where the Senate WOULD hold a trial. In a Senate trial, Adam Schiff would not control witnesses, testimony, and even who can and cannot speak. In a Senate trial, McConnell and the GOP would be in charge and have subpoena power. Democrats would be powerless, other than what the GOP "allows" them.
Today Senator Johnson suggested that Schiff would be called, as would Eric Ciaramella. Oh, and Senator Johnson would call Hunter and Joe Biden as well. If they did not cooperate, then he would use subpoena power. Imagine Democrats (who have been demanding everyone testify) actually "themselves" defying subpoenas? It would be the ultimate act of hypocrisy!
I mean who really cares about Trump staffers that nobody will remember three months from now? But everyone will know that Hunter and Joe Biden, Adam Schiff and the actual whistleblower defied Senate subpoenas! This will legitimately allow Republicans (and Trump) to ask all those questions about what Biden and the Democrats have to hide!
Let's be honest here. Even if you believe that Trump withheld the aid and pressured Ukraine to investigate Burisma. Even if it can be proven beyond every shadow of a doubt. It's still not an impeachable offense in the eyes of Republicans. There is no "winning" for the Democrats on this issue in the Senate.
They will not win "regardless" of what they prove or do not prove.
But certainly Joe Biden has a ton to lose. I am quite certain that Biden does not want to see this go to the Senate where it is a near certainty that both Hunter and Joe himself will be called to testify. Sure, he can defy the call to testify, defy a Senate subpoena, or even defy a court order. But it will be politically damaging either way.
In the house, the Democrats have control. They are on the offensive. But if they ultimately decide to hold the impeachment vote, they turn that control over to Republicans. There are many Democrats who are (after two weak days of testimony) attempting to decide if perhaps a vote to censure would be a more politically expedient option.
132 comments:
While you support a lying whore fucking asshole who now has 6 close aids going to jail....Yep.....those D's are chasing trump down like the lying dog he is!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!! Seems to me as I have always stated....trump is involved with every LITTLE detail of the Ukraine bribery....now another witness comes forward with actual knowledges of what trump said.....It was a shitty day culminating a shitty week for you idiots and trump!!!!!!
winning. We Veterns notice.
"President Trump grants clemency to 2 Army officers, restores rank to Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher
Trump signs full pardons for Army First Lieutenant Clint Lorance and Army Major Mathew Golsteyn, directs promotion of Special Warfare Operator First Class Edward R. Gallagher"
What a great week Economically the US Economy and us investors got stronger.
This has passed by the low income no equity holding class of the Three Socialist Stooges of CHT .
Interest rate control by the Federal Reserve shall not change from now till after the 2020 re-election of President Trump.
"another witness" yep exactly why we call her Dopie.
3 people talked at the Pile of Steaming Schiff mess, exactly none of them were witnesses to the Phone call.
"President Trump grants clemency to 2 Army officers,
Against the advice of their services......again, never listens to anyone but himself and goat fucking assholes like you......BWAAAAAAA!!!!
I knew I could smoke you out.
Your hate controls you.
The President has the power under this US Constitution to do this .
speaking of which , how goes the Socialist Democrat Party attempt to change the Electorial College System
exactly none of them were witnesses to the Phone call.
IOW's you got nothing else to defend the whore fucking liar in chief......seems like trump had the worse week evah in spite of you swallowing another load......Your boy's self inflicted article of impeachment intimidating a witness will of course be ignored by idiots like you and Lil Scotty as a direct witness of trumps involvement spills the beans on sondland......he's going to have a very uncomfortable week just like you are with trumps dick stuck up your ass!!!!!
What a FANTASTIC WEEK
Was in Vegas and even there saw a sign "OBAMA STILL SUCKS"
Heard a few anti-impeachment "hearing" comments, but nothing else.
What a JOKE this whole charade has become.
And the libs are clinging to their desperate wishes, and losing.
Just look at the libs here.
ROFLMFAO !!!
How about if Nancy "censures" the president then have the Senate "censure" Nancy and Schiff ?
Turnabouts fair play and that should only take a short while.
WINNING !!!
This president is being shown up for the lying, cowardly, unhinged, preening, dangerously self-centered and unprincipled person that he is.
That will continue to become obvious, and yes, Donald, do please keep being your own worse enemy, as you did with your totally false earlier remarks concerning an impeccably honorable and conscientious ambassador, and then capped that off even as she was testifying with a tweet that cannot be interpreted as anything more than another attempted at witness tampering and attempted intimidation.
Remember, the public desire for the impeachment of even Richard Nixon did not attain the status of an overwhelming demand until LATE in the impeachment inquiry. That could surely also be the case here.
Meanwhile, Democrats are not as interested in a successful impeachment (difficult in the Senate) as in damaging as much as possible Trump's AND MANY OF HIS SUPPORTERS reelection chances.
Let the inquiry continue and continue. Bring on the public testimonies of the eyewitnesses and earwitnesses to what the president said and did. Let the chips fall where they may.
Watching Impeachment Unfold In Real Time
November 16, 2019 at 8:35 am EST
Timothy Naftali:
“Even those of us with two impeachments under our belts have never seen anything quite like this one. Besides the modern procedural innovation that this time the House Judiciary Committee is not in charge of all aspects of the inquiry, this is also the first impeachment investigation that a citizen (let alone a member of Congress) can watch unfold in real time. In the Clinton era, the public practically learned the whole case for the prosecution at once, when the House dumped Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr’s salacious report, unedited, on the web.
“In the Nixon era, the televised Senate Watergate Hearings and the very public struggle that ensued between the White House and the Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox introduced the public to a lot of the data points of presidential misconduct and issues of possible criminality but neither the Senate nor the special prosecutor initially had impeachment as their goal. It was the Saturday Night Massacre a few months later that led to impeachment. The House Judiciary Committee that ultimately impeached Nixon did most of its work in closed sessions, only publicly revealing the additional important tapes and documents it had collected once the members had largely made up their minds and their televised debate had started.
“But what we saw this week was much more than just a dramatic retelling before the cameras of testimony already released in transcript form by the three House Committees assigned responsibility for the inquiry. Witnesses Ambassador Bill Taylor, George Kent and Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, especially Taylor, had IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION TO SHARE IN REAL TIME."
____________
And Trump helped with a REAL TIME demonstration of what an unprincipled jerk he is.
Let the inquiry continue and continue.
absolutely, pederast.
in fact, i hear mitch has pondered calling the entire DC phone book to testify.
a senate impeachment trial REQUIRES all 100 senators in attendance. and that's 6 days/week.
gee, i wonder what will happen to the campaigns of warren, sanders, booker, and... (LOL) kamala-toe?
why, an extraordinarily looooooooooooong senate impeachment trial might prove disastrous for those campaigns. so yes, let the inquiry continue, and continue, and continue, and continue and...
never in my life did i think i would ever see so many democrats work so hard to re-elect a republican president.
heh.
Verified account
@bennyjohnson
Amb. Yovanovitch said she was sad about getting fired by Trump:
"Poor baby.
Under Obama, ambassadors were coming back in body bags.
Now everyone is upset because one got fired.
So what."
- @JesseBWatters
He's right you know
@Cernovich
Roger Stone was prosecuted more aggressively than Jeffrey Epstein, that tells you all you need to know about the rule of law in America.
Under Obama, ambassadors were coming back in body bags.
Now everyone is upset because one got fired.
So what."
so what indeed.
the hypocrisy that is dripping from this "impeachment inquiry" can be measured in TONS.
in 2008 0linsky fired the US ambassadors EN MASSE.
Quote of the Day
November 16, 2019 at 8:18 am EST
“I do wonder why it was necessary to smear my reputation.”
— Former Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, quoted by Politico, acknowledging President Trump had the right to remove her for any reason.
___________
Even many of his supporters are regretting that. It makes their defense of him even more difficult.
And he even desperately and unsuccessfully tried again while you were testifying.
@JordanSchachtel
Update: Yovanovitch says that she is teaching 1 class at Georgetown (as a teaching fellow) and has zero responsibilities at the State Dept, where she is employed. The #resist administrative stater is receiving a full salary to do absolutely nothing.
OUTRAGEOUS !!! just not in the way dems are portraying. After getting "fired" she's getting paid MORE for doing NOTHING.
Budget Official to Testify Today
November 16, 2019 at 8:15 am EST
“The first official from inside the White House Office of Management and Budget to break ranks and testify in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump will appear for his closed-door deposition Saturday morning, offering insight into the decision to delay military aid to Ukraine,” the Washington Post reports.
“House investigators have spoken to officials from the Pentagon and the State Department about the hold placed on the congressionally appropriated funds, but they’re hoping Mark Sandy, a longtime career employee, will fill out their understanding of what transpired when he meets with them privately.”
YEP.
Sondland’s Testimony Continues to Crumble
November 16, 2019 at 7:10 am EST
Aaron Blake: “At three distinct points, we have seen Sondland’s testimony called into question.
*The first time was when other witnesses said he talked about a quid pro quo with Ukrainian officials on July 10, which Sondland soon confirmed via clarified testimony.
*The second was this week, when Taylor disclosed that Holmes had overheard a Sondland call with Trump on July 26 that Sondland had failed to mention and in which Trump asked about the investigations he was asking for.”
*“And now Holmes undermines a central claim in Sondland’s testimony: That Sondland didn’t know that Trump and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s interest in investigating a Ukrainian company that employed Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden had anything to do with the Biden family.”
__________
HE HAD BETTER COME CLEAN.
@HillaryClinton
Witness intimidation is a crime, no matter who does it. Full stop.
HOWLING !!!
@julie_kelly2
How can Trump’s tweet be obstruction of justice I was told this isn’t a criminal proceeding
must be on e of roger's objection of justice and he says that's in the constitution.
Y News
@Y__News_
Follow Follow @Y__News_
More
Mother of Benghazi victim hits back at Yovanovitch's claim
Patricia Smith, mother of one of the four Americans killed during consulate attack, speaks out against 'we are the Benghazi victims' comment.
did someone make a comment about yovanovich's "reputation"?
We can all be sure that there are red faces at the State Department, especially among those supposed to be its leaders, at the way they failed to stand up for Yovanovich and chose in cowardly fashion to kow tow to this corrupt President.
Time now to see his tax returns.
@EmeraldRobinson
The Democrats: "Ambassador Yovanovitch is tough enough to lead our State Dept in Ukraine!"
Also: "Ambassador Yovanovitch is not tough enough to handle that Trump tweet!"
…
Our media's fancy new legal ruling: "Every new Trump tweet is another article of impeachment!"
and the "resistance" libs will march in lockstep.
MY, MY
Parnas said that ‘the big guy,’ as he sometimes referred to the President in conversation, talked about tasking him and Fruman with what Parnas described as ‘a secret mission’ to pressure the Ukrainian government to investigate Joe Biden and his son Hunter.
"reputation"...............
Former United States Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch appeared to contradict herself on Friday during Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearing, stating that the Obama administration never raised the issue of Hunter Biden and Ukrainian gas company Burisma but then later stating that the Obama administration prepped her on that exact issue.
Here is an exchange between Yovanovitch and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY):
Stefanik: The first time that you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings and this was in the form of practice questions and answers. This was your deposition. And you testified that in this particular practice Q&A with the Obama State Department, it wasn’t just generally about Burisma and corruption, it was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?
Yovanovitch: Yes, it is.
Stefanik: And the exact quote from your testimony is, “The way the question was phrased in this model Q&A was, ‘what can you tell us about Hunter Biden being named to the board of Burisma?'” So for the millions of Americans watching, President Obama’s own State Department was so concerned about potential conflicts of interest from Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma that they raised it themselves while prepping this wonderful ambassador nominee before her confirmation and yet our Democratic colleagues and the Chairman of this committee cry foul when we dare ask that same question that the Obama State Department was so concerned about.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/former-ambassador-marie-yovanovitch-appears-to-contradict-herself-during-testimony-on-bidens-burisma
8:57
That was in a private meeting between Parnas,Fruman, Giuliani, and Trump.
But Trump said he didn't know the gentlemen though he may at sometime have been photographed with them.
Now I believe the tooth fairy.
@VicToensing
Hurray for @OANN for speaking whistleblower name. @EricCiaramella. Can the rest of MSM be as brave? Former CIA officer in interview said Eric hand picked by @JohnBrennan to go to White House. Think there was a plot there? #maga2020
John Brennan?? I think I've heard that name before. Who did he report to ?
Sean Davis
Verified account
@seanmdav
Follow Follow @seanmdav
More
Jim Jordan just got Yovanovitch, who's clearly a left-wing partisan, to admit she didn't do a single thing to prevent Ukrainian officials from meddling in our election in 2016. Her demeanor made it clear she did nothing because she supported foreign efforts to damage Trump.
11:58 AM - 15 Nov 2019
rrb said:
Stefanik: And the exact quote from your testimony is, “The way the question was phrased in this model Q&A was, ‘what can you tell us about Hunter Biden being named to the board of Burisma?'” So for the millions of Americans watching, President Obama’s own State Department was so concerned about potential conflicts of interest from Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma that they raised it themselves while prepping this wonderful ambassador nominee before her confirmation and yet our Democratic colleagues and the Chairman of this committee cry foul when we dare ask that same question that the Obama State Department was so concerned about.
this charade is backfiring and you can tell by the unhinged libs.
I see a ton of stuff out there since I left. Looks like the dems are circling the wagons and the rest of America is rallying towards Trump.
And then we will have the results of some MAJOR REAL INVESTIGATIONS...
munch, munch, munch.
NICE!!!:
NEW: President Trump grants full pardons to Army 1st Lt. Clint Lorance and Army Maj. Mathew Golsteyn, restores Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher to rank of Chief Petty Officer
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2019/11/15/new-president-trump-grants-full-pardons-to-army-1st-lt-clint-lorance-and-army-maj-mathew-golsteyn-restores-navy-seal-edward-gallagher-to-rank-of-chief-petty-officer/
THE DEVASTATING DAY Trump's presidency came into sharp focus — in Congress, the White House and in court
Yovanovitch testified, Roger Stone was convicted, Trump tweeted. It's all right there.
Nov. 15, 2019, 4:13 PM CST / Updated Nov. 15, 2019, 4:27 PM CST
By Jonathan Allen
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's worlds collided in devastating fashion in Washington on Friday, exposing legal and political vulnerabilities that Democrats want to exploit as he works to survive impeachment and his 2020 re-election bid.
All three branches of government demonstrated, in one day and in unmatchable high-profile fashion, the cost Trump and his loyalists have been willing to impose on the nation and its citizens — including members of his inner circle at times — in pursuit of political and personal aims. And ultimately, those costs are at the heart of the argument Democrats will make for ousting Trump, one way or the other.
"The powers of the presidency are immense, but they are not absolute and they cannot be used for corrupt purpose," House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said on Friday. "The American people expect the president to use the authority they grant him in service of the nation, not to destroy others to advance his personal or political interests."
THE DEVASTATING DAY continued===
ONE Inside a Capitol Hill hearing room, a veteran diplomat testified before the Intelligence Committee and the nation that Trump abused his power by smearing her so that he could, in subversion of American interests, facilitate a deal with Ukraine that would likely help his campaign.
TWO At the same time, a mile and a half away from Capitol Hill at the White House, Trump again tried to discredit former Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch as she recounted how the president and his loyalists had damaged those interests, hurt morale at the State Department and tried to sully her reputation, which lawmakers in both parties agreed was stellar.
THREE And before Yovanovitch was done testifying, at a federal courthouse between the Capitol and the White House, a jury convicted longtime Trump political adviser and self-described dirty trickster Roger Stone of lying to Congress and witness tampering in covering up his efforts to coordinate with WikiLeaks, which released a trove of stolen emails to help Trump win the 2016 election.
"The chickens are finally coming home to roost for the Trump presidency," said Neera Tanden.
THE REPORT CONTINUES...
@RetiredOrrin
It’s hard to pretend your impeachment exercise isn’t political when you’re poll-testing the words to impeach for.
Charade
Just keep tweeting, DEVIOUS DONALD.
@thebradfordfile
FAKE NEWS MORONS --
Biden did not create the "appearance" of a conflict of interest--it WAS a conflict of interest.
HUNTER BIDEN GOT PAID.
That's how a "conflict of interest" works.
something like $83,000 a month for 3 years...
@thebradfordfile
Any time I hear a blowhard on TV talk about the impeachment, I remember they're the same people who were convinced Michael Avenatti was going to make a run against Trump.
Then I laugh.
@DonaldJTrumpJr
Nov 14
Happy Birthday Whoopi! Give my best to your fugitive friend Roman! And thanks for hating on me and KG so much, it got me to #1 NYT best seller. You’re welcome for the highest ratings in months, perhaps have someone on the show who doesn’t hate America? #TRIGGERED #1
Might become the best selling book of the year.
Rat the dumb fuck offers the following insight.....
this charade is backfiring and you can tell by the unhinged libs.
BWAAAAAAAA!!!! As the unhinged trump is providing further ammo for impeachable offenses Rat takes another big gulf of fucking stupid!!!!! Maybe Jr can promote another book only assholes like you will buy further proving you have no sense!!!!!
Blogger anonymous said...
Rat the dumb fuck offers the following insight.....
that wasn't my insight denny.
it was from a different poster.
try to keep up, fat boy.
Meanwhile, Democrats are not as interested in a successful impeachment (difficult in the Senate) as in damaging as much as possible Trump's AND MANY OF HIS SUPPORTERS reelection chances.
So then you are admitting that Democrats are using their power of investigation for the "personal gain" of undermining the Republican Presidential candidate of 2020?
Isn't that what you want to impeach Trump for?
Trump Derangement Syndrome at its finest!
Sorry you dumb fuck...It sure had your signature stupidity pointed all over it.....seems like neither you or the coward can admit to any frailty or post a cogent thought!!!!!.....BWAAAAAA!!!! Dumb fucks both of you!!!!
@KurtSchingoethe
I'm trying to understand something inside my brain Barack Hussein Obama gives 1.6 billion to Iran Joe Biden's son gets paid Millions from China and has a salary from Ukraine gas company and my POTUS @realDonaldTrump is being impeached because of a phone call
I see lo iq "anonymous" is still lo iq, and still proving it.
ROFLMFAO !!!
A False Narrative created by Brennan/Obama ??? And swallowed by all libs and the FAKE NEWS media ???
The Brennan Dossier: All About a Prime Mover of Russiagate
By Aaron Maté, RealClearInvestigations
November 15, 2019
In the waning days of the Obama administration, the U.S. intelligence community produced a report saying Russian President Vladimir Putin had tried to swing the 2016 election to Donald Trump.
The January 2017 report, called an Intelligence Community Assessment, followed months of leaks to the media that had falsely suggested illicit ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin while also revealing that such contacts were the subject of a federal investigation. Its release cast a pall of suspicion over Trump just days before he took office, setting the tone for the unfounded allegations of conspiracy and treason that have engulfed his first term.
The ICA's blockbuster finding was presented to the public as the consensus view of the nation's intelligence community. As events have unfolded, however, it now seems apparent that the report was largely the work of one agency, the CIA, and overseen by one man, then-Director John Brennan, who closely directed its drafting and publication with a small group of hand-picked analysts.
Nearly three years later, as the public awaits answers from two Justice Department inquiries into the Trump-Russia probe’s origins, and as impeachment hearings catalyzed by a Brennan-hired anti-Trump CIA analyst unfold in Congress, it is clear that Brennan’s role in propagating the collusion narrative went far beyond his work on the ICA. A close review of facts that have slowly come to light reveals that he was a central architect and promoter of the conspiracy theory from its inception. The record shows that:
(continues)
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/11/15/the_brennan_dossier_all_about_a_prime_mover_of_russiagate_121098.html?dg
GOP Attempts to Defend Trump Keep Running Into Hard FACTS
November 16, 2019 at 12:06 pm EST
Playbook:
“These facts remain:
Republicans have not been able to change the arc of the story Democrats are building. They’ve been able to muddy the waters, a bit, but the facts remain:
the president was focused on an investigation into the Bidens,
the aid was withheld
and the president’s personal lawyer was running around, trying to dismantle the career of the ambassador to Ukraine, smearing her publicly and forcing her to return to Washington before the appointed time.
“This all makes Sondland’s testimony SOME OF THE MOST IMPORTANT moments in the Trump presidency. The play from Republicans will be to make Sondland out to be a political hack who wanted to gain the president’s favor. A longtime political donor, who would do anything to be liked."
INCLUDING LYING FOR HIS BOSS. THAT IS, UNTIL HE BEGAN TO SEE HE WAS FACING THE POSSIBILITY OF PROVABLE PERJURY SELF INCRIMINATION.
@15poundstogo
Is there a better example of people living in glass houses throwing stones than Dem impeachment hearings on Ukraine? Millions to Dems. Deep State. IC Leaks. Coups. Secret weapons deals. International “Cyber-Security” conferences.
…
Why was Biden “Mr. Ukraine”? Wasn’t Kerry Secretary of State?
@JohnWHuber
It’s not witness intimidation if they’re not a witness
@HillaryClinton
When people feel they can't run for office because of the intimidation and hatred they'll face as candidates, democracy is in danger.
Undercover Huber Retweeted Hillary Clinton
You’ve personally called at least three Presidential candidates Russian assets/traitors (Stein/Gabbard/Trump), two of which you were running against at the time
democrats ALWAYS accuse others of what they are ACTUALLY DOING. It's in their playbook.
The first official from inside the White House Office of Management and Budget to break ranks and testify in the impeachment inquiry against President Trump appeared for his closed-door deposition Saturday morning, offering insight into the decision to delay military aid to Ukraine.
House investigators have spoken to officials from the Pentagon and the State Department about the hold placed on the congressionally appropriated funds, but they’re hoping Mark Sandy, a longtime career employee, will fill out their understanding of what transpired when he meets with them privately.
The allegation that Trump held up nearly $400 million in military and security aid to Ukraine, hoping to use it as leverage to pressure the foreign government to announce an investigation into former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter, is central to the Democrats’ investigation.
He may have first hand in.
Republicans have not been able to change the arc of the story Democrats are building.
And Democrats just keep banging their heads against the wall!!!
Because they just don't get it!!!
Republicans DO NOT CARE about their "story"!!!
This will all come to a crashing humiliating end for the Democrats.
- Either because they do not follow through with impeachment.
- Or they do follow through... and they LOSE in the Senate and allow Trump to dance his victory celebration.
You know it's desperation time when they are hyping an impeachment witness that WASN'T EVEN WORKING FOR TRUMP at the time the alleged impeachable events took place!
James, Roger, and Denny don't see it (because they are willfully blind).
But this no longer has anything to do with quid pro quo or impeachment.
Democrats just want to drag out disgruntled deep state actors who are upset that Trump changed policy! Yovanovitch is example number one of someone who provided ZERO to their impeachment allegations (but provides criticism of Trump in general).
This is now being treated like some sort of "recall" hearing, not an impeachment hearing. Guess what! The Senate will bring it back to earth and Yovanovitch will probably not even be allowed to testify (as her information is irrelevant to impeachment).
Sondland’s testimony, if he doesn't plead the fifth amendment rights, he could be the final nail in the coffin.
https://www.msnbc.com/11th-hour/watch/new-details-emerge-after-marathon-impeachment-testimony-73576005645
Guess what. As Yovanovich left the chamber, people burst into applause.
Final nail, but there are other nails yet to come.
publicans DO NOT CARE about their "story"!!!
IOW's you don't give a shit about the constitution or trying to buy elections as long as he gives you judges.....!!!!!! Sad you suck this bad!!!!! Fuck the law.....I can do whatever I like.......It will be a sorry day when paybacks occurs and you realize how you have given the green light to everything;.....BWAAAAAAAA!!!!
Scott, you're willfully blind.
The crime is bribery.
The timeline clearly indicates that he withheld millions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine to get dirt on Biden and his son.
We now have first hand knowledge of the President withholding the money.
No body with a working brain, believes in deep state conspiracy theory allegations!
The witness testimony today is from a lifelong servant to the country in the OMB.
Yovanovitch was an active witness in the house committee meeting yesterday.
The President attempted to intimidate her testimony. This is a clear violation of the law.
He may have provided a second impeachable offense!
You have lost your mind Scott.
DEMOCRAT DISASTER: 53% of Black Voters, 60% of Other Minorities Say Liberal Media Trying to Help Democrats Impeach Trump
In a recent poll a majority of black voters and minority voters say the media is trying to help Democrats impeach President Trump.
And half of FOX News too, by the way.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/democrat-disaster-53-of-black-voters-60-of-other-minorities-say-liberal-media-trying-to-help-democrats-impeach-trump/
HUGE! Dems Went All-In on Schiff Impeachment and Now It’s a SCHIFF SHOW – Unconstitutional, No Crimes and 73% of Americans DON’T TRUST DEMOCRATS!
The Schiff Sham is unconstitutional, that is why it is so insane!
The Democrats created an impeachment process where the individual leading the process was involved in creating it with a CIA spy who leaked information from a Presidential call. The same CIA spy was kicked out of the White House in 2017 for leaking.
The spy met with Adam Schiff and his team before filing his complaint under the Whistleblower statute although this didn’t meet the standards for such a complaint. Whistleblower complaints are only legitimate in the Intel Community if related to a member of the Intel community. The President was the subject of the complaint and he is not a member of the Intel community.
@C_3C_3
Follow along...
Michael Atkinson is the IC IG that changed the whistleblower form to include HEARSAY days before Eric Ciaramella’s FAKE complaint.
Atkinson worked at the DOJ for John Carlin who approved the FAKE Carter Page FISA.
Carlin was Bob Mueller’s Chief of Staff.
COUP.
LOL LOL LOL
"...Trump wants to sign up for another article on impeachment too."
https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-it-s-bad-73572421535
How a CIA Analyst Triggered an Impeachment Probe
November 16, 2019 at 1:09 pm EST
Washington Post:
“The lights are often on late into the evening at CIA headquarters, where a team of elite analysts works on classified reports that influence how the country responds to global crises.
“In early August, one of those analysts was staying after hours on a project with even higher stakes. For two weeks, he pored over notes of alarming conversations with White House officials, reviewed details from interagency memos on the U.S. relationship with Ukraine and scanned public statements by President Trump.
“He wove this material into a nine-page memo outlining evidence that Trump had abused the powers of his office to try to coerce Ukraine into helping him get reelected. Then, on Aug. 12, the analyst hit ‘send.'"
AND THE REST WILL BE HISTORY
The crime is bribery.
You mean the focus group approved rhetoric is now "bribery".
There was no crime.
But I'll tell you what Roger!
Explain to me how someone who wasn't even employed in the State Department when your so called "crime" took place... was able to show evidence that bribery took place?
Explain that to me?
Oh and btw...
I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.
Well, son of a b-tch. (Laughter.) He got fired.
There is your proof of bribery!!
"
MyballsNovember 16, 2019 at 5:44 AM
Rep Stewart:
Do you have any information regarding the President committing any criminal action of any kind?
Ambassador:
No
Your assertions are not backed up by anything but thin air."
Three people appeared, none where witnesses,,,, all disagreed with this President erasing the Obama Failures.
Is attempted murder a crime even if it doesn't take place?
How about attempted robbery?
How about attempted rape?
How about attempted witness intimidation?
How about attempted bribery?
The cmfact the Socialist Democrats are "poll testing" is funny as he'll.
"You mean the focus group approved rhetoric is now "bribery". " CHT
Yes, Jane they all are.
And, do you have a point pedo.
THIS IS PROVABLE:
The Ukrainians, though reluctant to get involved in American politics, were on the verge of giving in to Trump's demand for an announced investigation of Biden and Biden's son for the sake of military aid, when suddenly -- right after the whistleblower's action -- the aid came through.
PRESIDENT Trump is still your Oresident.
"This is provable"
yet, you don't prove it.
Why not ?
Jane your assertions, opinions and speculation is noted.
@Shem_Infinite
The opening week of the impeachment circus was a disaster for the Democrats and the corrupt media. Their first three "star" witnesses admitted under oath they had no first hand knowledge of President Trump committing any crimes whatsoever. Americans see this as the sham it is.
James, you don't know who the Whistle sucker is , neither does Schiff.
William Barr agreed with you Scott A**hole.
THIS is the person in charge if the "Justice" department. Do you REALLY think he cares about the rights of EVERYONE? The system has never been fair for certain people, but this is more insidious...
"Attorney General Bill Barr launched into an emotional tirade against “the left” at an annual meeting of the conservative Federalist Society on Friday evening. Now, lawyers and legal commentators are intensifying calls for Barr’s impeachment."
Here is an excerpt:
"...Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they called ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch and his administration. The fact of the matter is: that in waging a scorched earth, no holds-barred war of resistance against this administration, it is the left that is engaged in the systemic shredding of norms and undermining the rule of law."
He should be impeached and convicted of high crimes and misdemeanors for abuse of power.
The· President: I would like you to do us a favor thoughbecause our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows alot about it. I would like you to find out what happened withthis whole si�uation with Ukraine, they s_ay Crowdstrike ... I guessyou have one of your weal thy people..
attempted bribery
Impeachable offense
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/calls-for-ag-barrs-impeachment-intensify-after-lunatic-authoritarian-federalist-society-speech/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
You mean the focus group approved rhetoric is now "bribery".
that's correct.
democrats actually had to poll it only to discover that their voter base is too fucking stupid to understand the latin quid pro quo.
and there is no crime. what we have are career diplomats with ivy degrees in a policy dispute with the guy who is constitutionally mandated to actually determine foreign policy.
and for that cunt yovanovich to compare herself to christopher stevens?
fucking disgusting.
she needs to be banished from polite society for being such a piece of shit.
@Jim_Jordan
Nellie Ohr testified to Congress that some of Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS’s oppo research against the Trump campaign came from a Ukrainian: SERHIY LESHCHENKO.
This is EXACTLY why Republicans asked @RepAdamSchiff to call Nellie Ohr to testify. Schiff refused. https://twitter.com/leshchenkos/status/1195464853944705024 …
We need to get to the bottom of Ukrainian 2016 election interference.
Scott it's lucky that you didn't become a lawyer.
You would suck.
The· President: I would like you to do us a favor thoughbecause our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows alot about it. I would like you to find out what happened withthis whole si�uation with Ukraine, they s_ay Crowdstrike ... I guessyou have one of your weal thy people..
i'm not seeing any reference to gropey joe or his coke-addled asshole kid, alky.
when this turns to shit on you, and it will, what are you going to do then?
@jsolomonReports
Ambassador Yovanovitch just testified she shared the sentiments of other State Dept officials that the Hunter Biden-Burisma relationship created the appearance of a conflict of interest for VP Joe Biden. That’s why I reported the column in the first place.
and getting $83,000 a month and a prosecutor fired is not an "appearance"
rrb wants to recreate the French revolution and beheadings of the opposition to the President.
Traitors should be put to death.
It's in the Constitution.
I DON'T NEED TO PROVE IT. THIS PROVES IT:
Ukraine’s Zelensky Bowed to Trump’s Demands, Until Luck Spared Him
Aides to Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, decided that military aid and support for peace talks outweighed the risks of appearing to take sides in American politics.
__________
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine took office in May. His new administration quickly fell under pressure from President Trump and his allies.
By Andrew E. Kramer, NYT Nov. 7, 2019
KIEV, Ukraine — It was early September, and Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, faced an agonizing choice: whether to capitulate to President Trump’s demands to publicly announce investigations against his political enemies or to refuse, and lose desperately needed military aid.
Only Mr. Trump could unlock the aid, he had been told by two United States senators, and time was running out. If the money, nearly $400 million, were not unblocked by the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30, it could be lost in its entirety.
In a flurry of WhatsApp messages and meetings in Ukraine’s capital, Kiev, over several days, senior aides debated the point. Avoiding partisan politics in the United States had always been the first rule of Ukrainian foreign policy, but the military aid was vital to the war against Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine, a conflict that has cost 13,000 lives since it began in 2014.
By then, however, Mr. Zelensky’s staffers were already conceding to what seemed to be the inevitable, and making plans for a public announcement about the investigations. It was a fateful decision for a fledgling president elected on an anticorruption platform that included putting an end to politically motivated investigations.
Elements of this internal Ukrainian debate have appeared in the Ukrainian news media and seeped into congressional testimony in the United States, as part of an impeachment inquiry undertaken after accusations surfaced of Mr. Trump’s demands.
But interviews in Kiev with government officials, lawmakers and others close to the Zelensky government have revealed new details of how high-level Ukrainian officials ultimately decided to acquiesce to President Trump’s request — and, by a stroke of luck, never had to follow through.
Aides were arguing in favor of “bowing to what was demanded,” said Petro Burkovskiy, a senior fellow at the Democratic Initiatives Foundation who has close ties to the Ukrainian government. They were willing to do so, he said, despite the risk of losing bipartisan support in the United States by appearing to assist Mr. Trump’s re-election bid. “The cost was high.”
As President Trump’s principal envoy to Ukraine, Gordon Sondland, admitted Tuesday in congressional testimony, the Trump administration had withheld the military aid to pressure Mr. Zelensky to make a public statement on the two investigations: one into whether former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. had pressed for the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma, a natural gas company where his son served on the board; the other into unproven accusations that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that meddled in the 2016 election to promote the candidacy of Hillary Clinton.
In the July 25 phone call that provoked a whistle-blower complaint and touched off the impeachment inquiry, Mr. Zelensky offered private assurances that his government would look into those matters.
But a public statement that raised doubts about Russian meddling and Mr. Biden, whom the president regarded as the greatest threat to his re-election, would be far more useful politically to Mr. Trump. Not only would it smear Mr. Biden, it could also appear to undermine the Mueller investigation into Russian electoral interference by pinning some blame on Ukraine.
Ms. Yovanovitch was unsparing in her criticism of the Trump administration. “Ukrainians who preferred to play by the old, corrupt rules sought to remove me,” she said. “What continues to amaze me is that they found Americans willing to partner with them and, working together, they apparently succeeded in orchestrating the removal of a U.S. ambassador.” She went on: “How could our system fail like this? How is it that foreign corrupt interests could manipulate our government?”A tug-of-war ensued between a senior aide to Mr. Zelensky, Andriy Yermak, and another of Mr. Trump’s envoys to Ukraine, Kurt Volker, over the wording of the proposed public statement. Mr. Volker went so far as to draft a statement for Mr. Zelensky that mentioned both investigations.
Mr. Yermak pushed back, suggesting language that mentioned investigations but in general terms, so as not to antagonize the Democrats. Late in the negotiations, the American diplomats consented to dropping mention of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election.
Even as Mr. Yermak negotiated the wording in August, the stakes were clear. While rumors had been swirling for months about a possible hold on military aid, by early August high-level Ukrainian officials had confirmed the freeze.
The trade soon became explicit. They were approached in September by Mr. Sondland, a major donor to Mr. Trump’s inauguration who had been appointed ambassador to the European Union despite having no diplomatic experience. At that point, he explained in blunt terms to Mr. Zelensky and Mr. Yermak, there was little chance the aid would be forthcoming until they made the public statement on the investigations.
“I said that resumption of the U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anticorruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Mr. Sondland said in sworn testimony released Tuesday by the House committees leading the impeachment inquiry.
Gordon Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, reversed himself this week in his impeachment inquiry testimony.
Mr. Trump wanted the Ukrainian president to speak on CNN, William B. Taylor Jr., the top American diplomat in Ukraine, testified.
But aides to Mr. Zelensky, on high alert to avoid any move that might irritate Mr. Trump, wondered if that was such a good idea, in that Mr. Trump habitually called CNN “fake news” in his Twitter posts.
They also uncovered a post from Mr. Trump attacking Fox News as “not working for us anymore!”
Nearly all Mr. Zelensky’s top advisers favored his making the public statement, said one of the officials who participated in the debate. United States military aid, they agreed, as well as diplomatic backing for impending peace talks to end the war outweighed the risks of appearing to take sides in American politics.
There was a lone holdout — Alexander Danyliuk, the director of the national security council. Mr. Danyliuk, who resigned in late September, told the Ukrainian news media that the Zelensky administration would now need to “correct the mistakes” in relations with the United States and “in particular their own.”
Finally bending to the White House request, Mr. Zelensky’s staff planned for him to make an announcement in an interview on Sept. 13 with Fareed Zakaria, the host of a weekly news show on CNN.
Though plans were in motion to give the White House the public statement it had sought, events in Washington saved the Ukrainian government from any final decision and eliminated the need to make the statement.
Word of the freeze in military aid had leaked out, and Congress was in an uproar. Two days before the scheduled interview, the Trump administration released the assistance and Mr. Zelensky’s office quickly canceled the interview.
Since then, Trump administration officials including the White House chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, have tried to argue that the security assistance could not have been conditioned on the public statement, because the aid was released without it.
That stance has crumbled as a succession of United States diplomats, capped by Mr. Sondland on Tuesday, have testified in the impeachment inquiry that the freeze on aid was part of a quid pro quo designed to coerce Mr. Zelensky into making the public statement.
In Kiev, there is still a debate about whether Mr. Zelensky caved or held out. “The Zelensky team was ready to make this quid quo pro,” said Mr. Burkovskiy, the analyst. “They were ready to do this.”
But Pavlo Klimkin, Ukraine’s foreign minister until a change of government on Aug. 29, said there was no telling what Mr. Zelensky would have ended up saying in the interview, as there were so many versions of a statement under negotiation.
“From the contacts that took place, it’s difficult to say if they led, or did not lead, to concrete deals,” Mr. Klimkin said in an interview. In public, Mr. Zelensky has insisted he would never order a politicized prosecution.
Either way, Mr. Klimkin said, Ukrainian officials were at the least keenly aware of the stakes — a trade of United States assistance for political favors, even as Mr. Trump’s supporters have insisted they should not have viewed relations in this light.
LIES PILED UPON LIES BUT NOW IN FULL LIGHT
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Scott it's lucky that you didn't become a lawyer.
You would suck.
says a job site gopher who drank himself to a liver transplant, had his wife leave AND nail him on a restraining order and currently resides in a fucking nursing home under lockdown.
you know alky, you're like the last fucking person on the fucking planet who should be standing in judgement of anyone on any topic.
fill a dumpster with human shit, douse it in gasoline and light it on fire.
that is what your life is, totally of YOUR making.
Omit the Ms. Yovanovich paragraph.
Nothing wrong with it, but it got included by mistake.
And now rrb and Commensa and ChUNtruth will show that the proof is not proof.
That will take some REAL dancing.
Traitors should be put to death.
they used to be.
but thanks to 0linsky we CELEBRATE them.
rrb admits he should be put to death
THIS IS PROVABLE:
And????
So far it hasn't been proven.
Even it if is...
Republicans do not believe it was a crime!
So hey! knock yourself out James!
I usually oppose the death penalty but in this case rrb should be put to death.
"...Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they called ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch and his administration. The fact of the matter is: that in waging a scorched earth, no holds-barred war of resistance against this administration, it is the left that is engaged in the systemic shredding of norms and undermining the rule of law."
every word of this is completely true.
the bozo's compost actually ran an impeachment story on the day of trump's inauguration. had another publication done that on january 20th 2009, 0linsky would've jailed the reporter(s) AND the publisher.
what we've been witnessing since trump's inauguration is the longest running coup attempt in history. the pussy hat-wearing, antifa-clubbing, disrupt j20-burning, pathologically lying, traitorous, schiff show resistance is a fundamental refusal to accept the results of the 2016 election.
there's no other way to describe it.
indictments are coming courtesy of barr and durham, and i can think of over a dozen people who should, at the very least, die in a federal prison, or preferably, in a just society with a rule of law, should hang from the neck until dead.
the behavior of our federal government should terrify normal, honest people. if these fucking scumbags from federal law enforcement and the intelligence community can do this to whom they've destroyed or attempted to destroy so far, they can do this to anyone.
and if you're applauding this shit then yes, you are a fucking traitor.
Omit the Ms. Yovanovich paragraph.
Nothing wrong with it, but it got included by mistake.
Ha! What? You actually think anyone reads what you cut and paste anyways?
The Republicans have admitted that it is a crime, but not an impeachable offense.
If Crooked Hillary Clinton was President and got dirt on her opponent for the President and Ukraine, you would support impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors.
You are a blatant hypocrite.
The proof is that Zelensky et. al. clearly DID know themselves to be under the pressure of a quid pro quo extortion attempt which Trump keeps stupidly claiming he and his cohorts never made to them.
LOL
DEFINITELY IMPEACHABLE
My comment was that Barr should be impeached!
He is acting as the lawyer for the President. His oath of office was to Protect and defend the Constitution of United States of America, not Donald Trump!
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The Republicans have admitted that it is a crime, but not an impeachable offense.
prove it.
you are wrong Jane.
but please continue.
you're applauding this shit then yes, you are a fucking traitor.
On the Rose Garden!
The Three Socialist Stooges of CHT are running on raw emotions, projections and yell at the sky Cray cray.
Fun as hell to watch.
If Ch didn't read it, that would explain his crass stupidity. But he did read it. He had plenty of time to read it. So his stupidity has no excuse.
The proof is that Zelensky et. al. clearly DID know themselves to be under the pressure of a quid pro quo extortion attempt which Trump keeps stupidly claiming he and his cohorts never made to them.
LOL
DEFINITELY PROVABLE--IT IS PROVED ABOVE BY FACTS.
AND THUS DEFINITELY IMPEACHABLE
Impeach
1, The President
2, The AG
3, The Sitting Member of SCOTUS
LOL@MynameisRogernotAlky
If Crooked Hillary Clinton was President and got dirt on her opponent for the President and Ukraine, you would support impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors.
well, for starters alky, that actually DID happen.
LOL.
but we did better than impeachment. our guy actually WON. he beat that rotten cunt fair and fucking square. which is exactly why you fucking crybabies are wanting to destroy the electoral college.
HA!
And the case will keep right on building and building and Trump will keep right on lying and lying and trying to obstruct the investigation and stupidly engaging in witness intimidation, etc. thereby adding some nice articles of impeachment, thank you, Devious Donald.
So JANE, using capitalization does Not prove anything other then you are Cray Cray hate filed pedo.
Wall Street Journal:
“Many farmers in the rural Midwest are frustrated with President Trump’s trade policies... In Minnesota, trade tensions are testing farmers’ loyalty to the president as many are still reeling from a late, messy harvest. Yields are down, and farmers are storing as much grain as possible, hoping they can sell when prices rise. With snow on the fields, some have yet to bring in all their crops.
“Mr. Trump lost Minnesota in 2016 by fewer than 45,000 votes, or 1.5 percentage points, and he is making a big push for the state in 2020. A recent state poll shows him trailing Democrats in hypothetical matchups by roughly the same margins as some national polls, and no GOP presidential candidate has won the state since Richard Nixon in 1972. But Democrats say they expect a tight race.”
_______
Get MN and PA and he's as good as gone.
Rogers memory is day to day. As RRB points out.
"well, for starters alky, that actually DID happen.
LOL."
USING CAPITALIZATION DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHING...
Thanks, for that brilliant observation Kansas Dimwit.
But you're right, it's the words and the arguments that
make the PROOF.
LOL. it's a fucking NY Times fable, pederast. it proves nothing. NOTHING.
Roger, why was it none of your worthless scum loser kids rally to help you as you became homeless, suicidal and clinically Depressed ?
Are they as broke and broken as you?
Everything they say that I don't like is FAKE NEWS!
--Devious Donald
James, IF you hoped to change our minds with what you pass off as "proof" , you did niether.
Yesterday, Representative Mac Thornberry appeared on ABC’s This Week to elucidate the Republican case against impeaching President Trump. To say that his appearance did not go well would understate the case considerably.
“It is inappropriate for a president to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political rival,” Thornberry conceded. Nonetheless, he argued for acquittal.
https://nymag-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/nymag.com/intelligencer/amp/2019/11/republican-thornberry-impeachment-ukraine-trump-he-does-this-all-the-time.html?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15739331947957&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=http%3A%2F%2Fnymag.com%2Fintelligencer%2F2019%2F11%2Frepublican-thornberry-impeachment-ukraine-trump-he-does-this-all-the-time.html
@HaseldenShearan
https://twitter.com/HaseldenShearan/status/1195787461009518593
The "whistleblower's" pictures tells a world of why the dems are now trying to hide him and why they wanted to have his face hidden
Before he certainly wasn't shy and seems to have run around with certain types of people.
@steph93065
I find it curious that #DavidHolmes only heard the part of the conversation he wants to testify in a feeble attempt to hurt our President, but couldn't hear the parts about the American Rapper in Sweden.
Did Trump lower his voice?
https://twitter.com/steph93065/status/1195769149860921344
look at graphic to see what she is talking about. another pathetic dem "witness"
rrb is so stupid
Roger, why was it none of your worthless scum loser kids rally to help you as you became homeless, suicidal and clinically Depressed ?
Are they as broke and broken as you?
Pedo Jane your words haven't proved anything.
but please continue .
Judge Declares Florida Ballots Unconstitutional
November 16, 2019 at 2:46 pm EST
“A federal judge in Florida ordered the state Friday to change the way candidates are listed on election ballots — a decision that Democrats in the crucial swing state say will finally take away an unfair advantage Republicans have enjoyed for years,” the Washington Post reports.
“Democrats called the decision ‘monumental.’ The state said it will appeal.
“The current law says that whichever party holds the governor’s office can list its candidates first on the ballot in general elections. That hurts an opposing party, U.S. District Court Judge Mark E. Walker said."
IF TRUMP (ASSUMING HE'S STILL AROUND) can't take Florida, kiss him goodbye.
Warren's latest thinking on healthcare may have broader appeal to voters.
If Ch didn't read it, that would explain his crass stupidity. But he did read it.
Why would I read your cut and pastes, James?
I continue to be 99% correct in things, just like I will be correct at how impeachment will turn out? I have no need to gather my opinions from others, especially not your sources. I read people who get things "right"... not people who push partisan crap.
Why would I lower myself to reading crap that ALWAYS turns out to be irrelevant or proven wrong?
“It is inappropriate for a president to ask a foreign leader to investigate a political rival
Since when does "inappropriate" become "illegal" or "impeachable"?
You do realize that about a billion inappropriate things happen every day in this country that are not "criminal"... including using the incorrect silverware, wearing an off-color t-shirt, saying the wrong thing to the wrong person...
All that being said, two Democratic witnesses have now made the point that asking Ukraine to investigate Burisma was appropriate (if not necessary).
FACT CHECK
45 Ways Trump Has Been Dishonest about Ukraine and Impeachment
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/16/politics/fact-check-trump-dishonesty-ukraine-and-impeachment/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_allpolitics+%28RSS%3A+CNN+-+Politics%29
45 LIES OUT OF THE 3,000 PLUS HE HAS TOLD SINCE BEING IN OFFICE
@codeofvets
This brings tears of joy to our nation and veteran community! We believed! We prayed! We raised awareness!
This is a beautiful miracle! Welcome home @clintlorance
Thank you @POTUS BEST CIC EVER
https://twitter.com/codeofvets/status/1195706606178177024
@PatriotNotPol
The #coup plotters can’t keep their story straight.
#ImpeachmentHearings
https://twitter.com/PatriotNotPol/status/1195790116960137216
Using the Mueller standard one/both should have the book thrown at them.
Lying under oath to keep the HOAX impeachment narrative going...
code of vets, tim donnelly et al....
showing the loser coward cannot gin up a thought of his own!!!!!1 But he can certainly suck a mean trumps fat old white ass with gusto!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
I continue to be 99% correct in things,
BWAAAAAAAA!!!! You are correct in things since you are the only one who knows what the fuck you are talking about.....As to what is impeachable inappropriate is fucking or sucking other women for money......it was inappropriate for clinton and he was impeached you dumb fuck!!!!
I see "anonymous" is stuck on his deviant sexual fantasies, bleating, and lo iq.
Nothing new
ROFLMFAO at the lo iq twerp!!!
Post a Comment