Trump could cure cancer and democrats would complain that he's putting hospitals out of business. I've never seen such narrow minded, obsessive political hatred. They deserve to lose big in November for all the crap they've put us through.
Anonymous Myballs said... Trump could cure cancer and democrats would
The dumb fuck of upstate posits more stupid than evah!!!!! I've never seen a more bigoted non thinking group of old white men that think there country deserves their brilliance!!!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!!! Keep posting loser....you are falling on your face and burning that candle from both sides!!!!!
Officials ‘Stunned’ Trump Took Most Extreme Option January 4, 2020 at 8:22 pm
“In the chaotic days leading to the death of Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, Iran’s most powerful commander, top American military officials put the option of killing him — which they viewed as the most extreme response to recent Iranian-led violence in Iraq — on the menu they presented to President Trump,” the New York Times reports.
“They didn’t think he would take it. In the wars waged since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Pentagon officials have often offered improbable options to presidents to make other possibilities appear more palatable.
“After initially rejecting the Suleimani option on Dec. 28 and authorizing airstrikes on an Iranian-backed Shia militia group instead, a few days later Mr. Trump watched, fuming, as television reports showed Iranian-backed attacks on the American Embassy in Baghdad… By late Thursday, the president had gone for the extreme option. Top Pentagon officials were stunned.”
Biden Says Walls Are Closing In on Trump January 4, 2020 at 11:35 pm EST
Joe Biden lit into President Trump’s tweeting about the possibility of retaliating against Iran Saturday night, calling it “incredibly dangerous and irresponsible,” Politico reports.
Biden accused Trump of taking reckless action as “the walls close in on this guy.”
Iran Will Respond Against U.S. Military Sites, Adviser Says January 5, 2020 at 8:10 am EST
The military adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader told CNN that his country’s response to the killing by the United States of one its most influential commanders will certainly be a military response “against military sites.”
Supposedly Trump came around to the “far out option” after the assault on the American embassy in Baghdad.
It sounds from her description like U.S. intelligence had reason to believe Soleimani was planning something major and simply deduced that the targets would be American interests based on the slow spiral of escalation between the two countries over the past six months. That seems like a … not unreasonable inference, especially coming so soon after the provocation at the embassy. Counterfactual: If the U.S. had had this same intelligence, had taken no action against Soleimani, and then a bunch of American troops and diplomats were killed in coordinated Iranian operations across Iraq, how much political trouble would Trump now be in for having stood by and done nothing to disrupt those attacks?
Trump Measures Everything Against Obama January 5, 2020 at 9:10 am EST
“As President Trump’s allies rushed to defend his decision to authorize a drone strike that killed Iran’s top military commander, many have focused less on Qasem Soleimani than another once-prominent actor in Middle East affairs: former president Barack Obama,” the Washington Post reports.
“For Trump, the true measure of the dramatic and risky military operation will become clear over time, as the United States braces for a potential retaliatory strike from Iran that could embroil his administration in the kind of complex and intractable Middle East conflict he had pledged to avoid.
"But amid the immediate fallout from Soleimani’s death, the president and his defenders rushed to declare that Trump had bested his predecessor in standing up to a malign foreign power.
“Trump, former aides said, has burned with a desire to erase Obama’s foreign policy legacy and prove himself a superior commander in chief.” _______________
Trump is already a far superior military commander as can be proven by the fact that the rank and file military actually respect him, vote for him, and support him. Remember the minutes long standing ovation he got at the Army Navy game?
The Washington Post has a secret source that knows how Donald Trump thinks.
And people like James actually don't question the plausibility of such a source. Obviously someone who "used to work with him" would be entirely clueless as to why he had Soleimani killed. But that doesn't stop people like James from slurping up the story anyways.
I have come to the conclusion that it's gotten to the point where Liberals just don't "not think for themselves" - but literally have given up thinking all together.
CH SAYS How many times was Obama "impeached" over made up crimes?
Ch, why were Trump's own people in his closest circle so desperate to hide from the public the "made up crime" of his telephone conversation requesting a self-serving "favor from a foreign government?"
CH SAYS Well once again.... The Washington Post has a secret source that knows how Donald Trump thinks. And people like James actually don't question the plausibility of such a source. Obviously someone who "used to work with him" would be entirely clueless as to why he had Soleimani killed. But that doesn't stop people like James from slurping up the story anyways.
Could it just be, Ch, that the Washington Post editorial staff think they have some understanding of how Trump thinks because they talk with his former aides?
“Trump, former aides said, has burned with a desire to erase Obama’s foreign policy legacy and prove himself a superior commander in chief.”
That holds up to how Trump continually presents himself, constantly bragging and claiming he has done everything better than Obama. (Strange, though, he and the GOP have found nothing "better" to replace Obamacare with.)
Could it just be, Ch, that the Washington Post editorial staff think they have some understanding of how Trump thinks because they talk with his former aides?
Which would make their source... their own personal opinion.
Which is not actually newsworthy, much less actual news to be printed in a what used to be called a "newspaper".
“Trump, former aides said, has burned with a desire to erase Obama’s foreign policy legacy and prove himself a superior commander in chief.”
hilarious.
0linsky made an apologetic, fellating speech to moose-limbs in cairo, paid a ransom to get our sailors back from iran, gave iran billion$ in cash in the dark of night, entered into an agreement that gave iran nuclear weapons, paid a prisoner swap ransom for bergdahl, and drew phony red lines he didn't have the balls to enforce.
oh, "and tell vladimir i'll have more flexibility after the election."
if trump rips a loud fart he's bettered 0linsky's foreign policy "legacy."
The Iraqi parliament passed a resolution Sunday calling on the government to expel U.S. troops from the country in response to the killing of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani and the leader of an Iraqi militia on its soil. Why it matters: The legal basis for the U.S. presence in Iraq is that it comes at Iraq's invitation. This vote does not formally revoke that invitation, but is a step along that path. A U.S. exit from Iraq could ultimately be one of the most consequential results of Soleimani's killing, because it would significantly hamper the fight against ISIS and achieve a major Iranian objective.
What they're saying: Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi said Iraq "cannot accept" a "political assassination" on its soil. He called the attack a grave violation of Iraqi sovereignty.
Mahdi also revealed that Soleimani was in Baghdad at the time of his killing to meet with him and relay Iran's response to a Saudi request for dialogue.
Mahdi noted that he had personally worked to defuse the protests outside the U.S. embassy in Baghdad earlier in the week, going so far as to threaten to step down if the militia behind the protests did not disperse.
President Trump thanked him for that effort, he said, at the same time he was planning an attack inside Iraq without permission.
The resolution passed today calls not only on U.S. troops to leave Iraq, but the entire international coalition fighting Islamic State
The Iraqi parliament passed a resolution Sunday calling on the government to expel U.S. troops from the country in response to the killing of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani and the leader of an Iraqi militia on its soil.
Why it matters: The legal basis for the U.S. presence in Iraq is that it comes at Iraq's invitation. This vote does not formally revoke that invitation, but is a step along that path. A U.S. exit from Iraq could ultimately be one of the most consequential results of Soleimani's killing, because it would significantly hamper the fight against ISIS and achieve a major Iranian objective.
Consiquentions of the President's actions to assassinate Soleimani.
A U.S. exit from Iraq could ultimately be one of the most consequential results of Soleimani's killing, because it would significantly hamper the fight against ISIS and achieve a major Iranian objective.
ya think?
we vaporized soleimani's ass from the sky; what makes you think we can't just keep doing it that way?
i say we turn the middle east into a big fucking video game. if we can read the writing on an aspirin tablet from 30,000, feet i think we can pick off whoever we want whenever we want...
WISE THOUGHTS FROM A FRIEND ON FACEBOOK, WHO WOULD RATHER NOT BE NAMED HERE:
"Following the death of Soleimani, it seems like nearly the entire DC / academia / journo natsec/forpol commentariat has penned variations on exactly the same essay: the President has acted hastily, has no plan, and isn’t capable of envisioning or handling what happens next. The template was established by Ben Rhodes on Twitter a few hours after an MQ-9 Reaper shot a Hellfire missile directly into his professional legacy, and it hasn’t varied much since.
Yet the more we learn — about the deliberations preceding the strike, about the chain of events leading to it, about the prior and subsequent moves by CENTCOM to harden the American position in the region — the more it seems that the President acted with deliberate aforethought, that he does in fact have a plan, and therefore likely is capable of envisioning and handling what happens next. That much is only fair, whether or not one agrees with the decision as such.
What nearly the entire DC / academia / journo natsec/forpol commentariat actually means by its critique, though, is that they weren’t included in any of this. Ben Rhodes took the time to rally them together, get their talking points aligned, illuminate a pathway to social and professional advancement: that’s their preferred template for Iran-related policymaking.
Donald Trump’s template for Iran-related policymaking is the smoking wreckage of a terror mastermind’s vehicle. The courtiers see it, and want to know what’s in it for them.
You dumb fuck...don't you ever look at real commentary rather than BS from POS like Malkin??????/ God no wonder why you are such damaged goods BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!
instapundit is glenn reynolds, a law prof at the U of Tenn.
Which proves what you dumb fuck....that a Vol can be a giant asshole....and what does Instadiiot have to do with PJ media??????? Now do us all a favor and pull your head out of trumps fat white ass since that is all you got!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! God you need help!!!!!
I can see why the dumb fuck rat enjoys Reynolds views......they mirror his own......except for beaners.....
In the past, Reynolds has called for the assassination of Iranian scientists and clerics,[6] and advocated the use of nuclear weapons against North Korea "if they start anything."[7]
Yep dumb fuck....he is just like you except he has a working brain while you don't!!!! BWAAAAAAAAA!!!
Ted Cruz has put forth a resolution commending the Trump administration for killing Mr. Iran. And it's structured and worded exactly the same way as the 2011 resolution that commended the obama admin for killing him laden and daring dems to oppose it. Lol.
not least the symbolic mention of 52 Iranian targets being held at risk - a reference to the 52 US hostages seized in the US Embassy in Tehran back in November 1979.
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran's state television reported that the country will no longer abide by any of the limits of its 2015 nuclear deal.
The announcement came Sunday night after another Iranian official said it would consider taking even-harsher steps over the U.S. killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani on Friday in Baghdad. State TV cited a statement by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's administration saying the country will not observe limitations on its enrichment, the amount of stockpiled enriched uranium as well as research and development in its nuclear activities. Duck and cover!😟
Retaliation for Soleimani could potentially come through the proxy forces which he oversaw as the head of an elite unit within the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. Soleimani's longtime deputy Esmail Ghaani already has taken over as the Quds Force's commander.
Iran is withdrawing from the 2015 nuclear deal, a move that could be perceived as the country taking a big step toward obtaining a nuclear weapon.
This announcement comes after President Donald Trump ordered a strike that killed Iran's top military leader, Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 nuclear deal in May 2018, and this moment is widely viewed as the catalyst for a series of escalatory events that have raised fears of a potential war.
Iran has vowed to enact "severe revenge" over Soleimani's death, who was killed in Baghdad on January 3.
Meanwhile, Trump has warned Iran that dozens of sites could be hit by the US if it strikes "Americans" or "American assets."
No one does Spectacular Failure and emotional breakdown like Alky.
"er AmickJanuary 4, 2020 at 9:58 AM
Our world has been set on edge by an erratic, unstable, and dangerously incompetent commander in chief. The stakes could not be higher. Every day that Donald Trump directs American national security is a dangerous day for the United States and the world."
Iran pulling out of nuclear deal commitment after U.S. strike that killed Soleimani
🚨No more restrictions on nuclear program. 🚨No restrictions on uranium enrichment. 🚨No more restrictions on number of centrifuges. 🚨No more restrictions on R&D.
Iran pulling out of nuclear deal commitment after U.S. strike that killed Soleimani
🚨No more restrictions on nuclear program. 🚨No restrictions on uranium enrichment. 🚨No more restrictions on number of centrifuges. 🚨No more restrictions on R&D.
Alky, Did lazy ass Obama get that "deal" ratified by Congress?
And did lazy ass trump ever get Mexico to pay for your wall???? Did he ever get the best health care evah through congress? Did the fuck trump break every treaty Obama had in place and make the world better????God you are a dumb fuck...
Anonymous Myballs said... Obama didn't have any treaties.
Sure you dumb fuck....is your masters in being an asshole for trump????? God sure left you holding that burning candle of stupid.....BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! I love shoving 2x4's up your old white stupid ass........
te Approves Two More Treaties, Bringing Obama ... www.lawfareblog.com/senate-approves-two-more... The Senate approved nine treaties in the Obama Administration’s first term, bringing to 15 the number of treaties approved by the Senate during the Obama Administration. This is the fewest number of treaties approved by the Senate in a four-year period or eight-year period at least since World War II (and probably much longer -- some intrepid law student will need to check)
Sure more than the none your asshole claimed you dumb fuck.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! God you need a new life....Imagine if you actually had the ability to energize anything but being stupid??????? Yep, trump sure united the entire country of Iran......always had hope it would someday get into the 21st century, but trump sure killed that.....dumb ass!!!!!!
IRAN is 100 % United according to the failed troll dopie.
Yep you dumb fuck....that is what is being reported from multiple sources......You have proof it is not?????? God your are a worthless pile of lying shit!!!!!
"Some analysts suggest that the impeachment of President Trump has emboldened enemies like Iran and North Korea - is this president is more vulnerable because of the impeachment effort?"
will not comply with the terms of a deal they haven't been complying with.
All other treaty signers say otherwise you lying sack of shit.......they are now saying they won't......tell us how that can be a good thing since it was working until trump beat his chest......assshole suggest you use the google machine and find out the truth.....BWAAAAAAA!!!
State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said in a statement Sunday afternoon:
" The United States is disappointed by the action taken today in the Iraqi Council of Representatives. While we await further clarification on the legal nature and impact of today’s resolution, we strongly urge Iraqi leaders to reconsider the importance of the ongoing economic and security relationship between the two countries and the continued presence of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. We believe it is in the shared interests of the United States and Iraq to continue fighting ISIS together.
This administration remains committed to a sovereign, stable, and prosperous Iraq." Behind the scenes: U.S. military leaders were "stunned" that Trump gave the order to kill Soleimani,
Even after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, “a date which will live in infamy,” President Franklin D. Roosevelt went to Congress on December 8 to declare war. But for us, we may wake up to see one of “These Media Posts” from Trump to see the start of WW3 on Twitter.
So our embassy was under attack and they asked for help. In less than an hour they received Marines, choppers and fighters. Well done to a real president.
New media strategy - Tom Friedman called soleimaini Iran's most overrated warrior and the dumbest guy in Iran. So now we'll downplay the strike and barely a blip on the screen. They're so transparent.
Trump’s Iran Strategy Has Backfired BIGTIME January 5, 2020 at 8:44 pm EST
“When President Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, he justified his unilateral action by saying the accord was flawed, in part because the major restrictions on Iran ended after 15 years, when Tehran would be free to produce as much nuclear fuel as it wanted,” the New York Times reports.
“But now, instead of buckling to American pressure, Iran declared on Sunday that those restrictions are over — a decade ahead of schedule. Mr. Trump’s gambit has effectively backfired.
“Iran’s announcement essentially sounded the death knell of the 2015 nuclear agreement. And it largely re-creates conditions that led Israel and the United States to consider destroying Iran’s facilities a decade ago, again bringing them closer to the potential of open conflict with Tehran that was avoided by the accord.”
Making America More Like Its Enemies January 5, 2020 at 10:39 pm EST
Jonathan Chait: “President Trump’s risky escalation of the conflict with Iran has confused many people who took him, if not for a dove exactly, then for a skeptic of wars, especially in the Middle East. The unfolding Iran adventure seems to open once again the question of what principle, if any, defines this president’s foreign policy. Isolationism? Nationalism? Whatever Fox News is demanding at any given moment?
“His real North Star is in fact an idea he has explicated many times, but — perhaps because it is so horrifying — even his critics seem hesitant to accept as a true motivation. Trump’s plan is to collapse the moral space between America and its enemies.”
ha. you don't know the meaning of the word. especially in the context of iran.
we've been at war with these murderous savages since 1979, alky. at best we've begrudgingly accepted the fact that they're a pain in the ass and threat to the stability of the region, and at worst we've gargled their balls on the world stage, tacitly accepting their nuclear development while lying about it, and ironically, showering them with the same cash that they're now offering for donald trump's head.
these fucking assholes needed a wake up call and they got one. big time.
look, i know it's a bit of a shock to the system to process the fact that we no longer have an apologetic, moose-limb appeasing coward in the white house. it's taking a bit of getting used to for all of us. but note the contrast -
0linsky purposely destabilized libya for no good reason at all by killing quaddafi. he had NO plan in place on how to fill the leadership void, and the situation there quickly turned to shit. and when the distress calls started coming in from benghazi, skeets and cankles rolled over and went back to sleep. American patriots died, and your dear leader and the feckless cunt lied to their families besides the caskets at dover AFB.
the US embassy in iraq comes under attack and ospreys full of marines are in the air IMMEDIATELY, the ragheads dispersed with teargas and the situation under control. no dead americans were dragged through the streets of baghdad.
as they say in texas - soleimani needed killin'. and there are countless others that do as well. like i said in an earlier post, we need to pull every american out of the region (except for israel) and turn it into a fucking video game. if we can see a pimple on a gnats ass from 30,000 ft., let's start blowing these cocksuckers up. from the comfort and security of a gaming console on a US military base.
Why did donnie contradict Pompeo about destroying heritage sites??????? I'm sure cramps will support bombing antiquity into dust because that is what he does best....slurp!!!!!!
US Democrats coached up Iran on talking points. "Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif later tweeted about his country's decision to end its commitments under the deal, arguing that other signatories were to blame."
Blogger KansasDemocrat said... Roger has Iran "retaliated" yet?
You grown a brain yet you goat fucking idiot??!!!!!! I sure hope their response is not what I am expecting, you on the other hand sit in your polluted smoke filled house hoping for the worst....typical of dumb fucking idiots!!!!! BTW....Trump is POTUS and is fucking things up beyond recognition and you just swallow!!!!!
Trump is even saying the U.S. will destroy places of cultural significance, the very thing we have criticized fundamentalists of other religious traditions for doing, and a gross violation of international law.
Another example of how Trump makes us LIKE (similar to) our enemies.
So the POS lying "pastor" who copies many times each day from political_lire without ever supplying a link now demands a link. And lo iq who bleats and cusses to make his "points" does the same.
Israel was and is strongly against the deal. Surrounding countries to Iran expressed similar sentiments. There was no unanimity to this deal other than some government elites and lefties. The same that got suckered by Iran to supply pallets of cash to fund their terrorist activities. This is all common knowledge and no link is needed, unless you are so lo iq it wouldn't matter anyway.
Sorry, Commensa, your "proofs" all have to do with Iran's actions to pressure our allies AFTER Trump violated the deal by pulling the US out of it.
Quoting from your first aricle:
Iran has been open about its violations of the deal in recent months, announcing the moves before making them and allowing the IAEA to verify them.
Speaking at a U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York, Iran’s deputy U.N. ambassador, Eshagh Al Habib, insisted that his country’s moves are all “reversable.”
They provide “opportunity for remaining JCPOA participants either to take serious practical steps to preserve the JCPOA or, along with the U.S., accept the full responsibility for any possible consequences,” he said.
Why can’t the party’s candidates simply admit Qasem Soleimani’s death makes Americans safer?
President Trump’s order to take out Qasem Soleimani was morally, constitutionally and strategically correct. It deserves more bipartisan support than the begrudging or negative reactions it has received thus far from my fellow Democrats.
Everyone’s Watching for Pelosi’s Next Move January 6, 2020 at 6:30 am EST
Playbook: “Even though she’s widely expected to send the impeachment articles to the Senate this week — thereby starting the trial — no one has any idea what she’s going to do because she has not made her intentions clear. The speaker’s office said no decision has been made on when she will send the articles. One thing that is clear is that she doesn’t have a ton of leverage, because Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell doesn’t tend to give into pressure almost ever. So, how she gets out of this situation will be interesting to see.
“Still, Democrats close to Pelosi believe the “delay” has been successful. They point to Trump’s erratic behavior on Twitter and the daylight between some of the president’s allies and McConnell over the push to change Senate rules to begin the trial without the House’s articles. These Democrats also say they believe they’ve gotten traction spotlighting the issue of fairness in the trial, something Rep. Adam Schiff pushed over the weekend and that Democrats will continue talking about this week.”
Why Adam Schiff doesn’t want anyone talking to the whistleblower
The truth behind House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff’s role in engineering President Trump’s impeachment may soon come out. Judicial Watch, a nonprofit group promoting government transparency, is suing to get the whistleblower’s emails.
That’s good news. Because no matter what comes of Trump’s Senate trial, Schiff should be held accountable for his devious methods. The public also needs the truth about the so-called whistleblower. Real whistleblowers deserve to be treated like heroes. But Eric Ciaramella — the man Judicial Watch and many media accounts have identified as the whistleblower and who doesn’t deny it — is no hero.
To dignify Ciaramella with the term “whistleblower” misrepresents what he did. Sure, he filed what is technically called a whistleblower complaint. But he had no firsthand knowledge of Trump’s controversial July 25 phone call or motivations. Every allegation in the complaint begins with “I learned from multiple US officials,” or “multiple officials told me,” or “officials with direct knowledge informed me.” Just gossip. He never names any sources. Ciaramella acted as the anti-Trumpers’ front man. As for courage, not an ounce: He is cowering from public view. https://nypost.com/2019/12/30/why-adam-schiff-doesnt-want-anyone-talking-to-the-whistleblower/?
The Moment Many Feared Most About Trump January 5, 2020
“For three years, President Trump’s critics have expressed concern over how he would handle a genuine international crisis, warning that a commander in chief known for impulsive action might overreach with dangerous consequences,” the New York Times reports.
“In the angry and frenzied aftermath of the American drone strike that killed Iran’s top general, with vows of revenge hanging in the air, Mr. Trump confronts a decisive moment that will test whether those critics were right or whether they misjudged him.”
The same people who try to cancel celebrities for decade old homophobic tweets are out on the streets protesting in favor of a regime that has literally tortured and executed thousands of gay people.
Whatever you think of the Soleimani strike, this is some pretty thick irony.
All of these woke actors spent the entire week practicing their dumb speeches--and the only thing anyone is going to remember is Ricky Gervais telling them their opinions don't matter.
like the shit the waterboy constantly copies over from political_lire. without a link or a source.
Denny assured us 100 % of Iran was against the Military killing of the Enemy General of Iran, in Iraq.
"So, all you see in Iranian state television -- state media -- [is], like, showing some people took to the street mourning and showing their sympathy [towards] Qassem Soleimani," she told Smith. "But, the fact is this: many Iranians do not see him as a hero and if you go to social media, that they are very happy."
SOLEIMANI'S TAKEDOWN FUELS NEW PARTISAN WARFARE ON CAPITOL HILL
"Why?" she questioned. "Because they have been witnessing how [the] Revolutionary Guard killed people in the streets across Iran."
Don't question intelligence officials who claim the President is a Russian spy but do question them when they successfully kill our hero and poet, Soleimani. We are not the enemy of the people.
For those of us who didn't watch the Golden Globes last night this is a must watch. and listen to all the applause he gets (link below)
Benny @bennyjohnson
This is the most savage 1 minute speech you will ever hear in your entire life. It is delivered directly to the faces of the hypocrite Hollywood celebrities it brutally & honestly targets. It’s punishing. It’s awkward. It’s true. RT for respect
Here's some interesting "water" from political lyre.
Judge Judy Endorses Bloomberg
Judge Judy Sheindlin, the star of the popular court show “Judge Judy,” announced in an advertisement that she is endorsing Michael Bloomberg in the Democratic presidential race.
Forbes notes the Judge Judy show has more than 10 million daily viewers. ________
I'm no Judge Judy fan, and I have no idea what her politics are, but she must really DESPISE Trump.
An Extraordinarily Dangerous Moment To keep his promise to kill an achievement of Obama’s, Trump has been willing to break his promise to get us out of wars in the Middle East.“But I want to make sure that the next president doesn’t have to go to war either.”
Obama was referring to the need to reach a comprehensive deal that rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. It would take almost two years of painstaking negotiations to get there, but the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) accomplished that objective. Under the terms of the JCPOA, Iran destroyed the core of a reactor that could have produced plutonium for a bomb; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges, the machines that can enrich uranium for a bomb; shipped 98 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium (enough for 10 bombs) out of the country; and submitted to the most comprehensive international inspections regime ever put into place to monitor a nuclear program.
These achievements are worth revisiting, because any hope of saving the Iran deal likely died with the killing of Qassem Soleimani. Indeed, it’s no surprise that the Iranian government has indicated that it will no longer abide by the limits on its nuclear program imposed by the JCPOA.
How did we get here? The debate over the Iran deal was among the most acrimonious of the Obama years. Throughout 2015, congressional Republicans stridently opposed it. Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia worked to marshal opposition. Think tanks churned out alarmist reports about the JCPOA. Tens of millions of dollars were spent by outside groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and United Against Nuclear Iran urging Congress to kill the deal. To prevent that legislation from passing, we worked frenetically to muster 41 Democratic Senate votes to uphold a filibuster. Indeed, the fact that it was far easier for George W. Bush to take the United States into an unnecessary war in Iraq than it was for Barack Obama to secure a nuclear deal to avoid one with Iran says something deeply strange and alarming about our country and its politics.
As soon as he began his run for the presidency, Donald Trump anointed himself the most strident of the JCPOA’s opponents, calling it “the worst deal ever negotiated.” It is likely, of course, that Trump couldn’t even describe the Iran deal’s terms. He failed to articulate a different set of nuclear restrictions, or to offer his views on the nature of centrifuges that Iran should be allowed to operate, or the research and development it should be permitted to perform. Trump simply wanted to destroy anything that Obama built and to satiate right-wing supporters who had their own reasons for opposing the JCPOA. What Trump could do is lie about the Iran deal, and he did so relentlessly.
Upon becoming president, Trump encountered an inconvenient truth: The Iran deal was working. Trump’s own intelligence community and military leadership confirmed that Iran was complying with the JCPOA’s terms; his own secretary of defense argued publicly that staying in the JCPOA was in America’s interest; and all the other parties to the deal—the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China—opposed Trump’s instinct to pull out. After Trump refused to certify that Iran was complying with the JCPOA (even though it was), even Republicans in Congress quietly refused to reimpose sanctions. And after Trump demanded a better deal, French President Emmanuel Macron offered him the opportunity to pursue one through negotiation, provided that the JCPOA stayed in place. DESPITE ALL THIS EVIDENCE and all these efforts, Trump WITHDREW from the Iran deal in May of 2018 and started reimposing sanctions.
Few recent presidential decisions have been proved to be so spectacularly wrong in such a short period of time.
Trump said that in withdrawing from the JCPOA, he would be in a stronger position to stop Iran’s provocations across the Middle East. The opposite has proved to be the case. Iran has already resumed aspects of its nuclear program that were restricted under the JCPOA. And over the past year alone, Iran or its proxies have shot down a U.S. drone, harassed and seized oil tankers, bombed Saudi oil infrastructure, killed unarmed protesters, and resumed rocket attacks against U.S. interests in Iraq. During the implementation of the Iran deal, by contrast, there wasn’t a single such rocket attack from a Shia militia. Trump initiated the escalatory cycle that led us to this extraordinarily dangerous moment.
It is ironic that the killing of Qassem Soleimani could put the final nail in the coffin of the Iran deal. In the Obama White House, we assessed that Soleimani opposed the JCPOA, and that he led a hard-line flank that viewed the Iranian foreign minister who conducted the negotiations with suspicion. This view was often mocked by Iran-deal opponents, who declared that there was no distinction between hard-liners and more moderate Iranian officials. Indeed, U.S. hawks regularly foreclose opportunities for diplomacy by wrongly seeing the government of any adversary as a monolith. But now, in the wake of Soleimani’s assassination, that debate is largely moot: As mourners flood the streets, all of Iran’s leaders are consolidating around a harder line, vowing to chase the United States out of the region.
We have already seen the consequences of this latest escalation in Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign come into focus. Iraqi leaders are demanding that we leave their country, after Americans sacrificed thousands of lives and spent more than $1 trillion there; new restrictions are inhibiting the fight against ISIS; Iran is casting off the remaining limits on its nuclear program.
In the months and years to come, we should expect renewed attacks against U.S. interests—and Americans—from Iran and its proxies. In contrast to the international unity that enabled the achievement of the JCPOA, Trump’s abandonment of it has alienated the United States from our closest allies. And in his other signature foreign-policy initiative—negotiations with North Korea—Kim Jong Un is pushing forward with his own nuclear and missile programs, perhaps having drawn the lesson that you cannot trust the United States to keep a nuclear deal.
In response, Trump and his chief lieutenant on Iran—Secretary of State Mike Pompeo—have sought to deflect blame to the JCPOA. While blaming the Iran deal for the consequences of Trump pulling out of the Iran deal is absurd, this argument should come as no surprise. Trump’s Iran policy was formulated in opposition to Obama, not with an eye toward actual governing. His is a worldview that relies on false charges, hyperbolic rhetoric, and assertions of strength as an end in itself, and not as a means to achieving something. At a Cabinet meeting last year, Trump sat at the table with a Game of Thrones–style poster that read “Sanctions are coming,” as if it were all just a movie, and not real life.
By contrast, the Iran deal was designed to address reality, and discharge the responsibilities of governing. Like any such effort, it was imperfect, and left all parties dissatisfied. For the Iranians, it was flawed because it didn’t lift all sanctions; it did, however, offer relief from certain sanctions and the prospect of further relief if Iran continued to comply. For us, it was flawed because the JCPOA’s most effective restrictions on the Iranian nuclear program expired in 10 or 15 years—but that was 10 or 15 more years of assurance than having no deal in place, and further negotiations that built upon the JCPOA were always an available option. Finally, the JCPOA didn’t stop Iran’s ballistic-missile program or its support for terror in the Middle East; however, the JCPOA did ensure that a regime that has ballistic missiles and supports terror was verifiably prohibited from obtaining a nuclear weapon. That was the whole point. You don’t make nuclear deals like that with your friends.
Indeed, imagine how the current crisis would feel if Iran already had nuclear weapons.
Governing isn’t about making demands on other countries that will never be achieved just because they sound good back in Washington. And the presidency certainly isn’t a movie. When “sanctions are coming,” real people get hurt and terrible things can happen in the real world. One legacy of the JCPOA is that it demonstrates the utility of a different approach.
TRUMP CAN THANK OBAMA As Trump confronts the consequences of a crisis of his own creation, he can thank Obama for the fact that Iran doesn’t yet have the means to produce a nuclear weapon. He can thank Obama for the fact that Iran’s nuclear program is set back from where it was in 2015. He can thank Obama for the inspections regime that has functioned effectively.
By contrast, the result of Trump’s policy—designed for Fox News sets and campaign rallies— has been a more hard-line Iranian politics, an Iranian adversary that has stepped up its provocations, and a newly unconstrained Iranian nuclear program.
Barack Obama did achieve a deal good enough to prevent his successor from having to go to war with Iran. But now, despite all that work, a de facto state of war exists between the United States and Iran. To keep his promise to kill an achievement of Obama’s, Donald Trump has been willing to break his promise to get us out of wars in the Middle East.
In doing so, he has tragically proved Obama right: The choice all along was between the Iran deal or an unconstrained Iranian nuclear program and some form of war.
I somehow messed up the beginning of the excellent article from THE ATLANTIC BY Ben Rhodes, former deputy national security director to Barack Obama.
It should have begun like this:
IDEAS An Extraordinarily Dangerous Moment To keep his promise to kill an achievement of Obama’s, Trump has been willing to break his promise to get us out of wars in the Middle East.
On a november night in 2013, Barack Obama delivered a statement about an interim nuclear deal that had just been reached, freezing Iran’s program in place. When he was done, I walked with him back to the entrance of his residence, watched by the stoic portraits of former presidents. “Congratulations,” I said. “You just made sure that we won’t have a war with Iran during your presidency.”
“That’s probably true,” he said, considering the question. “But I want to make sure that the next president doesn’t have to go to war either. The article then continues.
Nancy Pelosi and the treasonous Democrats were content staying on vacation forever...
That was until President Trump started blowing up their Iranian financiers. Now she and her cohorts are rushing back to Congress to preemptively surrender to Iran.
What a bunch of cowards.
Obama and Rhodes and the dems are strongly connected to the Iranian terrorists.
Blogger caliphate4vr said... oh so witty stupid ass old man
And Paula again tries to show what a tuff, big man he wants to be.....BWAAAAAAAA!!!! All brawn and no fucking brains....!!!! Funny coming from an old white southern asshole!!!!!!!
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton issued a statement that he is willing to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump if he is subpoenaed.
Bolton is one of four Trump administration officials that Democrats listed as potential witnesses for the trial.
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton issued a statement that he is willing to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump if he is subpoenaed.
Private citizen RRB has issued a statement that he is willing to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump if he is subpoenaed.
RRB is quoted as saying "Fuck yeah. Why not? It's all a fucking charade anyway. Who in their right mind would pass up a chance to mock such a shitshow?"
After his statement it seems increasingly unlikely RRB will be called to testify after all.
Before this policy went into effect, illegal immigrant families knew that if they crossed the border and claimed asylum, they’d effectively get a free pass. Immigration officials would release them into the U.S. within 20 days, on the promise that they would show up for their court date months in the future. Few bother to return. This policy was dubbed “Catch and Release” for a reason.
Now, they must wait in Mexico while immigration judges review their cases.
What “Remain in Mexico” revealed is how few asylum seekers have legitimate claims. In fact, judges granted asylum in less than 1% of the more than 10,000 MPP claims resolved so far, according to TRAC Research Center at Syracuse University.
The impact of this program has been little short of profound.
The number of apprehensions at the southwest border plummeted from 144,000 in May 2019 to just 42,649 in November – the last month for which the government has data. The number of families caught crossing illegally went from 84,486 in May to a mere 9,000 in November.
As the El Paso Times put it, “the policy has proved to be a virtual wall.”
Richard Grenell @RichardGrenell replying to Ben Rhodes
Iran was NOT complying. They were telling you they were and if you believed them then you ignored the clear violations found and the massive amount of information the Israelis discovered in a storage locker. You were duped. And still ignore these discoveries.
of course the waterboy will trust Iran and political_liar and Rhodes over Grenell and Israel.
Trump needs to immediately divest from his businesses and comply with the emoluments clause. Iran could threaten Trump hotels *worldwide* and he could provoke war over the loss of revenue from skittish guests.
His business interests should not be driving military decisions.
Blogger KansasDemocrat said... Cali, I hope US Gets Out.
The goat fucker and dumb fuck Paula come to their senses 16 years after advocating going in because of the imminent threat!!!!!!.....dayum that is highly amusing!!!!!!!
"Presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg (D) said it is “outrageous” to describe the death of Iran’s top terror chief as an “assassination” — a description used by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)."
This Mule Face Slut is a perfect Socialist. "Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) accused President Trump of engaging in a “war crime” for responding to Iran’s threats with forceful warnings, referring to him as an “authoritarian” who wants to “erase history” and calling him a “monster” over the weekend."
Trump Administration Blocks Iran’s Foreign Minister January 6, 2020 at 4:22 pm EST
“The Trump administration is barring Iran’s top diplomat from entering the United States this week to address the United Nations Security Council about the U.S. assassination of Iran’s top military official in Baghdad, VIOLATING THE TERMS OF A 1947 HEADQUARTERS AGREEMENT REQUIRING WASHINGTON TO PERMIT FOREIGN OFFICIALS INTO into THE COUNTRY TO CONDUCT U.N. BUSINESS,” Foreign Policy reports. ______________
SO TRUMP NOW THINKS HE'S THE DICTATOR OF THE WORLD
Pentagon Walks Back Letter on Troops In Iraq January 6, 2020 at 5:09 pm EST
Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley told CNN that a letter suggesting the U.S. would withdraw troops from Iraq was released by mistake and poorly worded, adding “that’s not what’s happening.”
Said Milley: “It’s an honest mistake… it should not have been sent.” _____________
These days Trump and his KEYSTONE COPS administration can't seem to get anything right.
Romney Would ‘Like to Hear’ from John Bolton January 6, 2020 at 5:06 pm EST
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) told CNN that “of course” he would like to hear from former National Security Adviser John Bolton during the upcoming impeachment trial.
Said Romeny: “I’d like to hear what he has to say.”
These days Trump and his KEYSTONE COPS administration can't seem to get anything right.
general salami-mommy was not available for comment, however it has been reported that he is enjoying the most serene coach accomodations on RAGHEAD AIR back to shithole-istan.
Wicki: Arab News is an English-language daily newspaper published in Saudi Arabia. It is published from Riyadh. Described by many political observers as a propaganda tool for the Saudi leadership, the paper has come under heavy criticism for its controversial take on many issues pertaining against Saudi Arabia, most notably with the Yemeni Civil War and of the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi (purportedly carried out by the Saudi high-level leadership). ____________
Cali reads it religiously and believes every word it prints.
New York Times: “Former White House officials and people close to Mr. Bolton have indicated that his testimony would likely be damning to Mr. Trump and put additional pressure on moderate Republicans to consider convicting him.
“That could fundamentally change the dynamics around the impeachment trial in the Senate, where a two-thirds vote — 67 senators — is needed to remove Mr. Trump. Democrats, the minority party, control 45 seats.”
Jan 5 - Nasiriyah, southern #Iraq#Iran-backed militias open fire on civilians refusing to attend a ceremony for the now dead IRGC Quds Force chief Qasem Soleimani.
All the while, @nytimes will describe him as a "popular general."
Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a statement about John Bolton’s offer to testify in a Senate impeachment trial:
"The President and Sen. McConnell have run out of excuses. They must allow key witnesses to testify, and produce the documents Trump has blocked, so Americans can see the facts for themselves.
"The Senate cannot be complicit in the President’s cover-up." _____________
Rachel Bade: “Quite amazing. A seismic shift in leverage. Before just two hours ago, most Republicans and even Democrats privately thought Schumer and Pelosi would send the articles with no witness agreement since McConnell had the upper-hand. Bolton just changed all that.”
Iran Officials Hint at Attacks on Trump Properties
“Senior Iranian officials are using Twitter to hint at threats against President Trump’s properties — including his Mar-a-Lago Club resort in Florida and Trump Tower in Manhattan — over the killing of Iran’s top military commander,” the New York Post reports. ______________
RAT, BE SURE TO GET A ROOM IN THE TRUMP TOWER, TOP FLOOR.
"We responded with strength, not fear,” former U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley wrote Friday, praising President Donald Trump’s authorization of an airstrike that killed a top Iranian military commander.
Late Thursday night, following the news that a U.S. airstrike had killed Senior Iranian Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani, Haley commented on Twitter that she is proud of Trump’s strength and decision to take appropriate action against “an arch terrorist with American blood on his hands”:
Former CIA Director David Petraeus said Sunday it's "impossible to overstate" the importance of the U.S. drone strike early Friday that killed Qassem Soleimani, Iran's top military commander, calling it "bigger" than the death of Osama bin Laden.
"It's impossible to overstate the significance of the attack that takes out Qassem Soleimani and the number two militia leader in Iraq as well, who also never dared to set foot in Iraq during the surge after we've missed him and he escaped," Petraeus said on "Face the Nation," referencing Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. "So this is bigger than bin Laden. It's bigger than Baghdadi.
Why haven't the Republicans heartily accepted Bolton's offer to testify? They've been saying all along that they want real witnesses to what Trump actually said and did, and when he said and did it.
In a compelling, if incomplete, account of some of the worst media actors in the Russian collusion hoax, the Washington Post neglects its own complicity.
In the thick catalog of media players responsible for promoting the phony Russia collusion storyline, the Washington Post occupies a marquee spot. The Post arguably inflicted the most damage on the first few months of Donald Trump’s presidency by pushing the concocted collusion drama even before Inauguration Day.
The Post first published illegally leaked classified information about former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in early 2017; articles detailing Flynn’s intercepted conversations with the Russian ambassador led to Flynn’s ouster in February 2017.
In April 2017, the Post first revealed the foreign intelligence surveillance warrant on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page. Several unnamed government officials leaked the explosive news that a former Trump campaign advisor was under government surveillance for his suspected ties to the Kremlin. The purpose of the report was to legitimize the rapidly unfolding narrative that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russians to hijack the 2016 election.
Since then, thousands of articles, columns, and editorials bolstering the hoax have dominated the paper’s website. In fact, Post reporters and editors met with dossier author Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson months before Election Day as they attempted to plant damaging stories about Team Trump’s canoodling with Russians.
After Steele’s name became public in early 2017, the Post routinely portrayed Steele as a trustworthy “former British intelligence officer” just trying to protect Americans from the Putin puppet running for president. … Scott Shane, a Times reporter on the collusion beat, told Wemple that the paper once considered posting an extended annotation of the dossier to compare reality with fiction. “We just found that there wasn’t enough certainty about the facts to really make that possible,” Shane told Wemple. Or, in other words, they knew the dossier was loaded with garbage but didn’t want to expose its illegitimacy because it would have helped Trump and discredited the Mueller probe. https://amgreatness.com/2020/01/02/washington-post-vs-the-steele-dossier/
James (the political_lire waterboy and lying POS "pastor") said... Why haven't the Republicans heartily accepted Bolton's offer to testify? They've been saying all along that they want real witnesses to what Trump actually said and did, and when he said and did it.
Everyone knows the dems are now just stalling their URGENT impeachment because they don't have shit and are hoping for a HAIL MARY..
They've voted, now pass it on.
What cowards Nancy and the Dems are. And dishonest.
KansasDemocrat said... Former CIA Director David Petraeus said Sunday it's "impossible to overstate" the importance of the U.S. drone strike early Friday that killed Qassem Soleimani, Iran's top military commander, calling it "bigger" than the death of Osama bin Laden.
"It's impossible to overstate the significance of the attack that takes out Qassem Soleimani and the number two militia leader in Iraq as well, who also never dared to set foot in Iraq during the surge after we've missed him and he escaped," Petraeus said on "Face the Nation," referencing Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. "So this is bigger than bin Laden. It's bigger than Baghdadi.
so naturally the dishonest dems and FAKE NEWS attack Trump over this and support Iran over America.
I’m liberal. You’re a disgrace. You insisted Obama standby as ISIS devils arose&enslaved Yazidis. You ignored Syrian slaughter by Soleimani,to appease Iranian theocrats. Assad’s chemical weapons exposed your BS “red line”. You betrayed secular Persians&Arabs. You’re weak. STFU
James said... Bolton, if he tells the simple truth, could prove to be a very effective HAIL MARY witness.?
Umm Bolton wants to attack Iran... and strongly approved of Trump in other areas... If Bolton and Schiff and the "whistleblower" were the last and final witnesses I say go for it.
of course I would expect to hear from at least 2 of these under oath in the future regardless.
😁 Voters’ opinions of swing district Democrats soured as they learned that their representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump, according to a poll released Monday.
An American Action Network (AAN) survey, conducted by NMB Research, found that a majority of likely voters across New York’s 22nd Congressional District, South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District, and New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District grew a more unfavorable opinion of their representative after they learned about their Democrat representatives’ vote to impeach the president.😋
194 comments:
What a FABULOUS START to the NEW YEAR for TRUMP and PATRIOTIC AMERICANS !!!
and some lowlifes spent it all bleating or being political_lires waterbody.
or not getting cured of their TDS. Depressing for them.
But Trump supporters are eating ice cream and celebrating.
ROFLMFAO !!!
Trump could cure cancer and democrats would complain that he's putting hospitals out of business. I've never seen such narrow minded, obsessive political hatred. They deserve to lose big in November for all the crap they've put us through.
Anonymous Myballs said...
Trump could cure cancer and democrats would
The dumb fuck of upstate posits more stupid than evah!!!!! I've never seen a more bigoted non thinking group of old white men that think there country deserves their brilliance!!!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!!! Keep posting loser....you are falling on your face and burning that candle from both sides!!!!!
"I've never seen such narrow minded, obsessive political hatred."
Forgotten about how you all acted during the Obama years?
Officials ‘Stunned’ Trump Took Most Extreme Option
January 4, 2020 at 8:22 pm
“In the chaotic days leading to the death of Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, Iran’s most powerful commander, top American military officials put the option of killing him — which they viewed as the most extreme response to recent Iranian-led violence in Iraq — on the menu they presented to President Trump,” the New York Times reports.
“They didn’t think he would take it. In the wars waged since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Pentagon officials have often offered improbable options to presidents to make other possibilities appear more palatable.
“After initially rejecting the Suleimani option on Dec. 28 and authorizing airstrikes on an Iranian-backed Shia militia group instead, a few days later Mr. Trump watched, fuming, as television reports showed Iranian-backed attacks on the American Embassy in Baghdad… By late Thursday, the president had gone for the extreme option. Top Pentagon officials were stunned.”
Biden Says Walls Are Closing In on Trump
January 4, 2020 at 11:35 pm EST
Joe Biden lit into President Trump’s tweeting about the possibility of retaliating against Iran Saturday night, calling it “incredibly dangerous and irresponsible,” Politico reports.
Biden accused Trump of taking reckless action as “the walls close in on this guy.”
Iran Will Respond Against U.S. Military Sites, Adviser Says
January 5, 2020 at 8:10 am EST
The military adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader told CNN that his country’s response to the killing by the United States of one its most influential commanders will certainly be a military response “against military sites.”
Supposedly Trump came around to the “far out option” after the assault on the American embassy in Baghdad.
It sounds from her description like U.S. intelligence had reason to believe Soleimani was planning something major and simply deduced that the targets would be American interests based on the slow spiral of escalation between the two countries over the past six months. That seems like a … not unreasonable inference, especially coming so soon after the provocation at the embassy. Counterfactual: If the U.S. had had this same intelligence, had taken no action against Soleimani, and then a bunch of American troops and diplomats were killed in coordinated Iranian operations across Iraq, how much political trouble would Trump now be in for having stood by and done nothing to disrupt those attacks?
"I JUST DON'T GET NO RESPECT" TRUMP
Trump Measures Everything Against Obama
January 5, 2020 at 9:10 am EST
“As President Trump’s allies rushed to defend his decision to authorize a drone strike that killed Iran’s top military commander, many have focused less on Qasem Soleimani than another once-prominent actor in Middle East affairs: former president Barack Obama,” the Washington Post reports.
“For Trump, the true measure of the dramatic and risky military operation will become clear over time, as the United States braces for a potential retaliatory strike from Iran that could embroil his administration in the kind of complex and intractable Middle East conflict he had pledged to avoid.
"But amid the immediate fallout from Soleimani’s death, the president and his defenders rushed to declare that Trump had bested his predecessor in standing up to a malign foreign power.
“Trump, former aides said, has burned with a desire to erase Obama’s foreign policy legacy and prove himself a superior commander in chief.”
_______________
NEVER HAPPEN.
The attacks on the Embassy were ineffectual and got called off long before the killing of Soleimani.
Forgotten about how you all acted during the Obama years?
How many times was Obama "impeached" over made up crimes?
Obama opposition and Trump hatred are quite different. You're making things up now.
Ineffectual because Trump called in reinforcements. No Bengali this time.
Trump is already a far superior military commander as can be proven by the fact that the rank and file military actually respect him, vote for him, and support him. Remember the minutes long standing ovation he got at the Army Navy game?
Well once again....
The Washington Post has a secret source that knows how Donald Trump thinks.
And people like James actually don't question the plausibility of such a source. Obviously someone who "used to work with him" would be entirely clueless as to why he had Soleimani killed. But that doesn't stop people like James from slurping up the story anyways.
I have come to the conclusion that it's gotten to the point where Liberals just don't "not think for themselves" - but literally have given up thinking all together.
CH SAYS How many times was Obama "impeached" over made up crimes?
Ch, why were Trump's own people in his closest circle so desperate to hide from the public the "made up crime" of his telephone conversation requesting a self-serving "favor from a foreign government?"
CH SAYS
Well once again....
The Washington Post has a secret source that knows how Donald Trump thinks.
And people like James actually don't question the plausibility of such a source. Obviously someone who "used to work with him" would be entirely clueless as to why he had Soleimani killed. But that doesn't stop people like James from slurping up the story anyways.
Could it just be, Ch, that the Washington Post editorial staff think they have some understanding of how Trump thinks because they talk with his former aides?
“Trump, former aides said, has burned with a desire to erase Obama’s foreign policy legacy and prove himself a superior commander in chief.”
That holds up to how Trump continually presents himself, constantly bragging and claiming he has done everything better than Obama. (Strange, though, he and the GOP have found nothing "better" to replace Obamacare with.)
😁Forgotten about how you all acted during the Obama years?🤣 Mutt Jane
Nope, unlike you, No one called for his assasination.
Could it just be, Ch, that the Washington Post editorial staff think they have some understanding of how Trump thinks because they talk with his former aides?
Which would make their source... their own personal opinion.
Which is not actually newsworthy, much less actual news to be printed in a what used to be called a "newspaper".
How many times was Obama "impeached" over made up crimes?
BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!! How many times did Obama act like an asshole like trump????????
“Trump, former aides said, has burned with a desire to erase Obama’s foreign policy legacy and prove himself a superior commander in chief.”
hilarious.
0linsky made an apologetic, fellating speech to moose-limbs in cairo, paid a ransom to get our sailors back from iran, gave iran billion$ in cash in the dark of night, entered into an agreement that gave iran nuclear weapons, paid a prisoner swap ransom for bergdahl, and drew phony red lines he didn't have the balls to enforce.
oh, "and tell vladimir i'll have more flexibility after the election."
if trump rips a loud fart he's bettered 0linsky's foreign policy "legacy."
if trump rips a loud fart he's bettered 0linsky's foreign policy "legacy."
And if trump ever tells the truth, that will be a first in 3 years......LOLOLOLOL
The Iraqi parliament passed a resolution Sunday calling on the government to expel U.S. troops from the country in response to the killing of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani and the leader of an Iraqi militia on its soil.
Why it matters: The legal basis for the U.S. presence in Iraq is that it comes at Iraq's invitation. This vote does not formally revoke that invitation, but is a step along that path. A U.S. exit from Iraq could ultimately be one of the most consequential results of Soleimani's killing, because it would significantly hamper the fight against ISIS and achieve a major Iranian objective.
What they're saying: Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi said Iraq "cannot accept" a "political assassination" on its soil. He called the attack a grave violation of Iraqi sovereignty.
Mahdi also revealed that Soleimani was in Baghdad at the time of his killing to meet with him and relay Iran's response to a Saudi request for dialogue.
Mahdi noted that he had personally worked to defuse the protests outside the U.S. embassy in Baghdad earlier in the week, going so far as to threaten to step down if the militia behind the protests did not disperse.
President Trump thanked him for that effort, he said, at the same time he was planning an attack inside Iraq without permission.
The resolution passed today calls not only on U.S. troops to leave Iraq, but the entire international coalition fighting Islamic State
https://www.axios.com/iraq-parliament-us-troops-iran-soleimani-39f46292-b6b5-4070-bacd-92cfae1f586c.html
The resolution passed today calls not only on U.S. troops to leave Iraq, but the entire international coalition fighting Islamic State
fine with me. fuck those ragheads.
bring our troops home and let shithole-istan be shithole-istan.
trying to impose democracy on savages belonging to a child molesting death cult was always a bad idea.
The Iraqi parliament passed a resolution Sunday calling on the government to expel U.S. troops from the country in response to the killing of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani and the leader of an Iraqi militia on its soil.
Why it matters: The legal basis for the U.S. presence in Iraq is that it comes at Iraq's invitation. This vote does not formally revoke that invitation, but is a step along that path. A U.S. exit from Iraq could ultimately be one of the most consequential results of Soleimani's killing, because it would significantly hamper the fight against ISIS and achieve a major Iranian objective.
Consiquentions of the President's actions to assassinate Soleimani.
Who were the traitors from America who funded Soleimani ?
With pallets of cash ?
And freed and returned his terrorist buddies ?
And even now are taking his side ?
A U.S. exit from Iraq could ultimately be one of the most consequential results of Soleimani's killing, because it would significantly hamper the fight against ISIS and achieve a major Iranian objective.
ya think?
we vaporized soleimani's ass from the sky; what makes you think we can't just keep doing it that way?
i say we turn the middle east into a big fucking video game. if we can read the writing on an aspirin tablet from 30,000, feet i think we can pick off whoever we want whenever we want...
...from a gaming console here in the states.
WISE THOUGHTS FROM A FRIEND ON FACEBOOK, WHO WOULD RATHER NOT BE NAMED HERE:
"Following the death of Soleimani, it seems like nearly the entire DC / academia / journo natsec/forpol commentariat has penned variations on exactly the same essay: the President has acted hastily, has no plan, and isn’t capable of envisioning or handling what happens next. The template was established by Ben Rhodes on Twitter a few hours after an MQ-9 Reaper shot a Hellfire missile directly into his professional legacy, and it hasn’t varied much since.
Yet the more we learn — about the deliberations preceding the strike, about the chain of events leading to it, about the prior and subsequent moves by CENTCOM to harden the American position in the region — the more it seems that the President acted with deliberate aforethought, that he does in fact have a plan, and therefore likely is capable of envisioning and handling what happens next. That much is only fair, whether or not one agrees with the decision as such.
What nearly the entire DC / academia / journo natsec/forpol commentariat actually means by its critique, though, is that they weren’t included in any of this. Ben Rhodes took the time to rally them together, get their talking points aligned, illuminate a pathway to social and professional advancement: that’s their preferred template for Iran-related policymaking.
Donald Trump’s template for Iran-related policymaking is the smoking wreckage of a terror mastermind’s vehicle. The courtiers see it, and want to know what’s in it for them.
Americans see it, and they know."
Indeed they do.
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/353682/#respond
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/353682/#respond
You dumb fuck...don't you ever look at real commentary rather than BS from POS like Malkin??????/ God no wonder why you are such damaged goods BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!
You dumb fuck...don't you ever look at real commentary rather than BS from POS like Malkin??????
malkin?
you fucking imbecile.
instapundit is glenn reynolds, a law prof at the U of Tenn.
do us a favor and just end it all denny. go ahead. chamber a round and eat that pistol.
the world will instantly become a better place.
instapundit is glenn reynolds, a law prof at the U of Tenn.
Which proves what you dumb fuck....that a Vol can be a giant asshole....and what does Instadiiot have to do with PJ media??????? Now do us all a favor and pull your head out of trumps fat white ass since that is all you got!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! God you need help!!!!!
I can see why the dumb fuck rat enjoys Reynolds views......they mirror his own......except for beaners.....
In the past, Reynolds has called for the assassination of Iranian scientists and clerics,[6] and advocated the use of nuclear weapons against North Korea "if they start anything."[7]
Yep dumb fuck....he is just like you except he has a working brain while you don't!!!! BWAAAAAAAAA!!!
Ted Cruz has put forth a resolution commending the Trump administration for killing Mr. Iran. And it's structured and worded exactly the same way as the 2011 resolution that commended the obama admin for killing him laden and daring dems to oppose it. Lol.
instapundit is glenn reynolds, a law prof at the U of Tenn.
Which proves what you dumb fuck....that a Vol can be a giant asshole....and what does Instadiiot have to do with PJ media??????
As always fatty fucks up and it’s someone else’s fault
Trump says US ready to strike 52 Iranian sites if Tehran attacks
not least the symbolic mention of 52 Iranian targets being held at risk - a reference to the 52 US hostages seized in the US Embassy in Tehran back in November 1979.
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran's state television reported that the country will no longer abide by any of the limits of its 2015 nuclear deal.
The announcement came Sunday night after another Iranian official said it would consider taking even-harsher steps over the U.S. killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani on Friday in Baghdad. State TV cited a statement by Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's administration saying the country will not observe limitations on its enrichment, the amount of stockpiled enriched uranium as well as research and development in its nuclear activities.
Duck and cover!😟
Retaliation for Soleimani could potentially come through the proxy forces which he oversaw as the head of an elite unit within the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. Soleimani's longtime deputy Esmail Ghaani already has taken over as the Quds Force's commander.
Ooooh scary, maybe they can follow the NORKs lead and claim the gulf of Rumsfeld will be transformed into a sea of fire.
Roger and James seem to be very afraid of Iran. Don't worry guys. Trump will protect you.
Iran is withdrawing from the 2015 nuclear deal, a move that could be perceived as the country taking a big step toward obtaining a nuclear weapon.
This announcement comes after President Donald Trump ordered a strike that killed Iran's top military leader, Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani.
Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 nuclear deal in May 2018, and this moment is widely viewed as the catalyst for a series of escalatory events that have raised fears of a potential war.
Iran has vowed to enact "severe revenge" over Soleimani's death, who was killed in Baghdad on January 3.
Meanwhile, Trump has warned Iran that dozens of sites could be hit by the US if it strikes "Americans" or "American assets."
Consequences
No one does Spectacular Failure and emotional breakdown like Alky.
"er AmickJanuary 4, 2020 at 9:58 AM
Our world has been set on edge by an erratic, unstable, and dangerously incompetent commander in chief. The stakes could not be higher. Every day that Donald Trump directs American national security is a dangerous day for the United States and the world."
Alky did Iran respond Yet?
Iran pulling out of nuclear deal commitment after U.S. strike that killed Soleimani
🚨No more restrictions on nuclear program.
🚨No restrictions on uranium enrichment.
🚨No more restrictions on number of centrifuges.
🚨No more restrictions on R&D.
Iran pulling out of nuclear deal commitment after U.S. strike that killed Soleimani
🚨No more restrictions on nuclear program.
🚨No restrictions on uranium enrichment.
🚨No more restrictions on number of centrifuges.
🚨No more restrictions on R&D.
Forgotten about how you all acted during the Obama years?🤣 Mutt Jane
Nope, unlike you, No one called for his assasination.
The Three Socialist Stooges of CHT cheerleading For Iran is noted.
Today's technology is just too big for Alky.
Iran pulling out of nuclear deal commitment after U.S. strike that killed Soleimani
The pull out of a deal they weren't keeping anyway.
If you think they were, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell.
Cheap.
Alky, Did lazy ass Obama get that "deal" ratified by Congress?
Gross incompetence
"The Obama administration has been pursuing a policy of "strategic patience"
Alky, Did lazy ass Obama get that "deal" ratified by Congress?
And did lazy ass trump ever get Mexico to pay for your wall???? Did he ever get the best health care evah through congress? Did the fuck trump break every treaty Obama had in place and make the world better????God you are a dumb fuck...
Obama didn't have any treaties. He never bothered to get them ratified by Congress.
Damn, we don't call you dopey for nothing.
Go Vikings.
Lol@Dumb poop eating Dopie.
Anonymous Myballs said...
Obama didn't have any treaties.
Sure you dumb fuck....is your masters in being an asshole for trump????? God sure left you holding that burning candle of stupid.....BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! I love shoving 2x4's up your old white stupid ass........
te Approves Two More Treaties, Bringing Obama ...
www.lawfareblog.com/senate-approves-two-more...
The Senate approved nine treaties in the Obama Administration’s first term, bringing to 15 the number of treaties approved by the Senate during the Obama Administration. This is the fewest number of treaties approved by the Senate in a four-year period or eight-year period at least since World War II (and probably much longer -- some intrepid law student will need to check)
Obama was a lazy shit.
Fewest approved in 8 years.
Thanks Dopie
who knew that killing the #2 Guy in Iraqis Regime would energize the American Leftist.
Fewest approved in 8 years.
Sure more than the none your asshole claimed you dumb fuck.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! God you need a new life....Imagine if you actually had the ability to energize anything but being stupid??????? Yep, trump sure united the entire country of Iran......always had hope it would someday get into the 21st century, but trump sure killed that.....dumb ass!!!!!!
English?
Try again poop eating mutt.
IRAN is 100 % United according to the failed troll dopie.
We're talking about Iran shit for brains
IRAN is 100 % United according to the failed troll dopie.
Yep you dumb fuck....that is what is being reported from multiple sources......You have proof it is not?????? God your are a worthless pile of lying shit!!!!!
Anonymous Myballs said...
We're talking about Iran shit for brains
He knows that, it’s why he’s the most dishonest poster here. Word games are all the fat man has, pathetic existence
Blogger Roger Amick said...
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran's state television reported that the country will no longer abide by any of the limits of its 2015 nuclear deal.
so...
...the ragheads will not comply with the terms of a deal they haven't been complying with.
gosh alky, sounds serious.
next thing you know they'll be putting the US on double secret probation.
then we'll truly be fucked, eh?
question for you alky -
why is it that you always consistently root for our enemies and against America?
i'm genuinely curious as i'm unable to relate to that behavior.
FOX NEWS CHRIS WALLACE:
"Some analysts suggest that the impeachment of President Trump has emboldened enemies like Iran and North Korea - is this president is more vulnerable because of the impeachment effort?"
POMPEO:
"You should ask Mr. Soleimani."
will not comply with the terms of a deal they haven't been complying with.
All other treaty signers say otherwise you lying sack of shit.......they are now saying they won't......tell us how that can be a good thing since it was working until trump beat his chest......assshole suggest you use the google machine and find out the truth.....BWAAAAAAA!!!
State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said in a statement Sunday afternoon:
" The United States is disappointed by the action taken today in the Iraqi Council of Representatives. While we await further clarification on the legal nature and impact of today’s resolution, we strongly urge Iraqi leaders to reconsider the importance of the ongoing economic and security relationship between the two countries and the continued presence of the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. We believe it is in the shared interests of the United States and Iraq to continue fighting ISIS together.
This administration remains committed to a sovereign, stable, and prosperous Iraq."
Behind the scenes: U.S. military leaders were "stunned" that Trump gave the order to kill Soleimani,
All other treaty signers say otherwise you lying sack of shit.......
It’s not a treaty fatman
I'm a patriotic American citizen.
I'm glad the guy is getting his virgins
Iran doesn't have the power to attack the United States directly.
Why have you become isolationist?
Even after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, “a date which will live in infamy,” President Franklin D. Roosevelt went to Congress on December 8 to declare war. But for us, we may wake up to see one of “These Media Posts” from Trump to see the start of WW3 on Twitter.
And if we declare war, Trump will go to Congress. So stop the shit.
So our embassy was under attack and they asked for help. In less than an hour they received Marines, choppers and fighters. Well done to a real president.
New media strategy - Tom Friedman called soleimaini Iran's most overrated warrior and the dumbest guy in Iran. So now we'll downplay the strike and barely a blip on the screen. They're so transparent.
President F-UP has REALLY F'ed UP.
Trump’s Iran Strategy Has Backfired BIGTIME
January 5, 2020 at 8:44 pm EST
“When President Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, he justified his unilateral action by saying the accord was flawed, in part because the major restrictions on Iran ended after 15 years, when Tehran would be free to produce as much nuclear fuel as it wanted,” the New York Times reports.
“But now, instead of buckling to American pressure, Iran declared on Sunday that those restrictions are over — a decade ahead of schedule. Mr. Trump’s gambit has effectively backfired.
“Iran’s announcement essentially sounded the death knell of the 2015 nuclear agreement. And it largely re-creates conditions that led Israel and the United States to consider destroying Iran’s facilities a decade ago, again bringing them closer to the potential of open conflict with Tehran that was avoided by the accord.”
PRESIDENT KNOW-IT-ALL DOESN'T KNOW BEANS.
".You have proof it is not?poop eating Mutt Denise
Answer; Yes
IRAN has a Nuke Deal with many other Nations?
Yet, because ONLY the US ends the Deal, IRAN now is out also????
Why, won't the other Nations hold IRAN in the deal?
TRUMP HAS NOW RUINED THE DEAL EVEN FOR ALL OUR ALLIES WHO WANTED TO KEEP HONORING IT.
Making America More Like Its Enemies
January 5, 2020 at 10:39 pm EST
Jonathan Chait:
“President Trump’s risky escalation of the conflict with Iran has confused many people who took him, if not for a dove exactly, then for a skeptic of wars, especially in the Middle East. The unfolding Iran adventure seems to open once again the question of what principle, if any, defines this president’s foreign policy. Isolationism? Nationalism? Whatever Fox News is demanding at any given moment?
“His real North Star is in fact an idea he has explicated many times, but — perhaps because it is so horrifying — even his critics seem hesitant to accept as a true motivation. Trump’s plan is to collapse the moral space between America and its enemies.”
Isreal And The UK support Trumps Actions.
Will the DNC Again work again Bernie to deny him the Democrat Nomination?
Leading in New Hampshire , tie in Iowa, leading in fund rasing.
Why have you become isolationist?
ha. you don't know the meaning of the word. especially in the context of iran.
we've been at war with these murderous savages since 1979, alky. at best we've begrudgingly accepted the fact that they're a pain in the ass and threat to the stability of the region, and at worst we've gargled their balls on the world stage, tacitly accepting their nuclear development while lying about it, and ironically, showering them with the same cash that they're now offering for donald trump's head.
these fucking assholes needed a wake up call and they got one. big time.
look, i know it's a bit of a shock to the system to process the fact that we no longer have an apologetic, moose-limb appeasing coward in the white house. it's taking a bit of getting used to for all of us. but note the contrast -
0linsky purposely destabilized libya for no good reason at all by killing quaddafi. he had NO plan in place on how to fill the leadership void, and the situation there quickly turned to shit. and when the distress calls started coming in from benghazi, skeets and cankles rolled over and went back to sleep. American patriots died, and your dear leader and the feckless cunt lied to their families besides the caskets at dover AFB.
the US embassy in iraq comes under attack and ospreys full of marines are in the air IMMEDIATELY, the ragheads dispersed with teargas and the situation under control. no dead americans were dragged through the streets of baghdad.
as they say in texas - soleimani needed killin'. and there are countless others that do as well. like i said in an earlier post, we need to pull every american out of the region (except for israel) and turn it into a fucking video game. if we can see a pimple on a gnats ass from 30,000 ft., let's start blowing these cocksuckers up. from the comfort and security of a gaming console on a US military base.
RRB, just knocked the Three Socialist Stooges of CHT out of the Park.
TRUMP HAS NOW RUINED THE DEAL EVEN FOR ALL OUR ALLIES WHO WANTED TO KEEP HONORING IT.
Well James, even our euroweenie allies have conceded that Iran has been taking them for a ride.
euroweenie allies have conceded that Iran has been taking them for a ride.
I'd be willing to bet you cannot provide a link for that pile of fake bullshit opinion......BWAAAAAAAA!! You saying so is most amusing!!!!!!
RRB is smacking Alky around.
"Asharq Al-Awsat" is a mouth piece for Iran Towelhead Government and a trusted source cited by Roger Amadick
Why did donnie contradict Pompeo about destroying heritage sites??????? I'm sure cramps will support bombing antiquity into dust because that is what he does best....slurp!!!!!!
lazy Obimbo and his Wife Mike .
"Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)"
Never a Treaty more like a under the table hand job by Obama
US Democrats coached up Iran on talking points.
"Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif later tweeted about his country's decision to end its commitments under the deal, arguing that other signatories were to blame."
Roger has Iran "retailiated" yet?
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
Roger has Iran "retaliated" yet?
You grown a brain yet you goat fucking idiot??!!!!!! I sure hope their response is not what I am expecting, you on the other hand sit in your polluted smoke filled house hoping for the worst....typical of dumb fucking idiots!!!!! BTW....Trump is POTUS and is fucking things up beyond recognition and you just swallow!!!!!
Where is Commensa's link for his claim that our "euroweenie allies" are now allegedly realizing they've been "taken for a ride by Iran?"
Yeah, where is the link for that claim?
Seems the one taken for a ride has been Trump.
Prove it’s not true James.
Making us even more like our enemies:
Trump is even saying the U.S. will destroy places of cultural significance, the very thing we have criticized fundamentalists of other religious traditions for doing, and a gross violation of international law.
Another example of how Trump makes us LIKE (similar to) our enemies.
LOL Commensa makes a statement he cannot prove and then challenges me to prove it's not true.
Sorry, Commensa, it doesn't work that way.
The ball is in YOUR court to "prove" your unfounded "off the top of your head" claim.
Sorry, Commensa, it doesn't work that way.
Yeah, it does since the truth is self-evident.
UN reports increasing violations of Iran nuclear deal
Iran using advanced centrifuges, violating nuclear deal
Your turn.
So the POS lying "pastor" who copies many times each day from political_lire without ever supplying a link now demands a link. And lo iq who bleats and cusses to make his "points" does the same.
Israel was and is strongly against the deal. Surrounding countries to Iran expressed similar sentiments. There was no unanimity to this deal other than some government elites and lefties. The same that got suckered by Iran to supply pallets of cash to fund their terrorist activities. This is all common knowledge and no link is needed, unless you are so lo iq it wouldn't matter anyway.
Or are totally dishonest.
But at least they are posting in Sunday Funnies.
ROFLMFAO !!!
Sorry, Commensa, your "proofs" all have to do with Iran's actions to pressure our allies AFTER Trump violated the deal by pulling the US out of it.
Quoting from your first aricle:
Iran has been open about its violations of the deal in recent months, announcing the moves before making them and allowing the IAEA to verify them.
Speaking at a U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York, Iran’s deputy U.N. ambassador, Eshagh Al Habib, insisted that his country’s moves are all “reversable.”
They provide “opportunity for remaining JCPOA participants either to take serious practical steps to preserve the JCPOA or, along with the U.S., accept the full responsibility for any possible consequences,” he said.
So the person responsible is Trump.
Your turn.
The Democrats and Iran
By Joe Lieberman
Why can’t the party’s candidates simply admit Qasem Soleimani’s death makes Americans safer?
President Trump’s order to take out Qasem Soleimani was morally, constitutionally and strategically correct. It deserves more bipartisan support than the begrudging or negative reactions it has received thus far from my fellow Democrats.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-democrats-and-iran-11578262553?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/pmUkXAkzzd
Everyone’s Watching for Pelosi’s Next Move
January 6, 2020 at 6:30 am EST
Playbook:
“Even though she’s widely expected to send the impeachment articles to the Senate this week — thereby starting the trial — no one has any idea what she’s going to do because she has not made her intentions clear. The speaker’s office said no decision has been made on when she will send the articles. One thing that is clear is that she doesn’t have a ton of leverage, because Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell doesn’t tend to give into pressure almost ever. So, how she gets out of this situation will be interesting to see.
“Still, Democrats close to Pelosi believe the “delay” has been successful. They point to Trump’s erratic behavior on Twitter and the daylight between some of the president’s allies and McConnell over the push to change Senate rules to begin the trial without the House’s articles. These Democrats also say they believe they’ve gotten traction spotlighting the issue of fairness in the trial, something Rep. Adam Schiff pushed over the weekend and that Democrats will continue talking about this week.”
Now Today's Socialist Democrat is force to defend Islamic Statues and Monuments from destruction while destroying the US historical ones at home.
Mrs Denise said "I sure hope their response is not what I am expecting"
What are you expecting ?
You really are that dumb aren't you James.
They have been violating the agreement all along.
Those are just the first two of the many stories of their violations.
You want to blame Trump when it was Obama who made the toothless deal and sent cash to kill Americans over to Iran.
Kansas Democrat has a surprising love for Confederate war memorials that many blacks find offensive.
Where's your link james ?
pr should I say the political_lire waterboy ?
ROFLMFAO !!!
Joe Lieberman has been a Trump toady since as early as May of 2017, and thus out of step with his alleged "fellow Democrats."
At this point what difference does it make.
Why do I need a link when Commensa's own links disprove his point?
The many faces of ugly jane.
Muslims a religion of Peace.
Name Two Nations of that Faith that are at Peace.
Why Adam Schiff doesn’t want anyone talking to the whistleblower
The truth behind House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff’s role in engineering President Trump’s impeachment may soon come out. Judicial Watch, a nonprofit group promoting government transparency, is suing to get the whistleblower’s emails.
That’s good news. Because no matter what comes of Trump’s Senate trial, Schiff should be held accountable for his devious methods.
The public also needs the truth about the so-called whistleblower. Real whistleblowers deserve to be treated like heroes. But Eric Ciaramella — the man Judicial Watch and many media accounts have identified as the whistleblower and who doesn’t deny it — is no hero.
To dignify Ciaramella with the term “whistleblower” misrepresents what he did. Sure, he filed what is technically called a whistleblower complaint. But he had no firsthand knowledge of Trump’s controversial July 25 phone call or motivations. Every allegation in the complaint begins with “I learned from multiple US officials,” or “multiple officials told me,” or “officials with direct knowledge informed me.” Just gossip. He never names any sources. Ciaramella acted as the anti-Trumpers’ front man. As for courage, not an ounce: He is cowering from public view.
https://nypost.com/2019/12/30/why-adam-schiff-doesnt-want-anyone-talking-to-the-whistleblower/?
The Moment Many Feared Most About Trump
January 5, 2020
“For three years, President Trump’s critics have expressed concern over how he would handle a genuine international crisis, warning that a commander in chief known for impulsive action might overreach with dangerous consequences,” the New York Times reports.
“In the angry and frenzied aftermath of the American drone strike that killed Iran’s top general, with vows of revenge hanging in the air, Mr. Trump confronts a decisive moment that will test whether those critics were right or whether they misjudged him.”
KansasDemocrat said...
The many faces of ugly jane.
I always just see a slimy, deceitful, POS liar of a "pastor".
and a waterboy.
Why do I need a link when Commensa's own links disprove his point?
They actually prove my point only a hack denier of facts would say otherwise.
Still your turn James.
Paul Joseph Watson
@PrisonPlanet
The same people who try to cancel celebrities for decade old homophobic tweets are out on the streets protesting in favor of a regime that has literally tortured and executed thousands of gay people.
Whatever you think of the Soleimani strike, this is some pretty thick irony.
thebradfordfile™
@thebradfordfile
All of these woke actors spent the entire week practicing their dumb speeches--and the only thing anyone is going to remember is Ricky Gervais telling them their opinions don't matter.
like the shit the waterboy constantly copies over from political_lire. without a link or a source.
Name two nations of the Muslim faith that are at peace.
Jordan
Indonesia
Maldives
Morocco
Indonesia
Kuwait
Mayotte
Denny assured us 100 % of Iran was against the Military killing of the Enemy General of Iran, in Iraq.
"So, all you see in Iranian state television -- state media -- [is], like, showing some people took to the street mourning and showing their sympathy [towards] Qassem Soleimani," she told Smith. "But, the fact is this: many Iranians do not see him as a hero and if you go to social media, that they are very happy."
SOLEIMANI'S TAKEDOWN FUELS NEW PARTISAN WARFARE ON CAPITOL HILL
"Why?" she questioned. "Because they have been witnessing how [the] Revolutionary Guard killed people in the streets across Iran."
Iranian journalist and activist Masih Alinejad
The_War_Economy
@The_War_Economy
Don't question intelligence officials who claim the President is a Russian spy but do question them when they successfully kill our hero and poet, Soleimani. We are not the enemy of the people.
For those of us who didn't watch the Golden Globes last night this is a must watch. and listen to all the applause he gets (link below)
Benny
@bennyjohnson
This is the most savage 1 minute speech you will ever hear in your entire life.
It is delivered directly to the faces of the hypocrite Hollywood celebrities it brutally & honestly targets.
It’s punishing.
It’s awkward.
It’s true.
RT for respect
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1214004906341863425
EVEN BETTER, the entire opening monolog
Benny
@bennyjohnson
SAVAGE
Ricky Gervais just gave the best opening speech at the #GoldenGlobes ever.
He absolutely DESTROYED Hollywood.
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1214003226938351617
Here's some interesting "water" from political lyre.
Judge Judy Endorses Bloomberg
Judge Judy Sheindlin, the star of the popular court show “Judge Judy,” announced in an advertisement that she is endorsing Michael Bloomberg in the Democratic presidential race.
Forbes notes the Judge Judy show has more than 10 million daily viewers.
________
I'm no Judge Judy fan, and I have no idea what her politics are, but she must really DESPISE Trump.
the waterboy said: "I'm no Judge Judy fan, and I have no idea what her politics are"
see the BENNY link above, and look at the faces of celebs like Tom Hanks.
they are devastated.
and the crowd loves it
TRUMP 2020
So good I had to watch it again. The "pastor" would like the part where Gervais points out it was a good year for pedophile films.
Can't make this shit up.
An Extraordinarily Dangerous Moment
To keep his promise to kill an achievement of Obama’s, Trump has been willing to break his promise to get us out of wars in the Middle East.“But I want to make sure that the next president doesn’t have to go to war either.”
Obama was referring to the need to reach a comprehensive deal that rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. It would take almost two years of painstaking negotiations to get there, but the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) accomplished that objective. Under the terms of the JCPOA, Iran destroyed the core of a reactor that could have produced plutonium for a bomb; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges, the machines that can enrich uranium for a bomb; shipped 98 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium (enough for 10 bombs) out of the country; and submitted to the most comprehensive international inspections regime ever put into place to monitor a nuclear program.
These achievements are worth revisiting, because any hope of saving the Iran deal likely died with the killing of Qassem Soleimani. Indeed, it’s no surprise that the Iranian government has indicated that it will no longer abide by the limits on its nuclear program imposed by the JCPOA.
How did we get here? The debate over the Iran deal was among the most acrimonious of the Obama years. Throughout 2015, congressional Republicans stridently opposed it. Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia worked to marshal opposition. Think tanks churned out alarmist reports about the JCPOA. Tens of millions of dollars were spent by outside groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and United Against Nuclear Iran urging Congress to kill the deal. To prevent that legislation from passing, we worked frenetically to muster 41 Democratic Senate votes to uphold a filibuster. Indeed, the fact that it was far easier for George W. Bush to take the United States into an unnecessary war in Iraq than it was for Barack Obama to secure a nuclear deal to avoid one with Iran says something deeply strange and alarming about our country and its politics.
As soon as he began his run for the presidency, Donald Trump anointed himself the most strident of the JCPOA’s opponents, calling it “the worst deal ever negotiated.” It is likely, of course, that Trump couldn’t even describe the Iran deal’s terms. He failed to articulate a different set of nuclear restrictions, or to offer his views on the nature of centrifuges that Iran should be allowed to operate, or the research and development it should be permitted to perform. Trump simply wanted to destroy anything that Obama built and to satiate right-wing supporters who had their own reasons for opposing the JCPOA. What Trump could do is lie about the Iran deal, and he did so relentlessly.
Upon becoming president, Trump encountered an inconvenient truth: The Iran deal was working. Trump’s own intelligence community and military leadership confirmed that Iran was complying with the JCPOA’s terms; his own secretary of defense argued publicly that staying in the JCPOA was in America’s interest; and all the other parties to the deal—the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China—opposed Trump’s instinct to pull out. After Trump refused to certify that Iran was complying with the JCPOA (even though it was), even Republicans in Congress quietly refused to reimpose sanctions. And after Trump demanded a better deal, French President Emmanuel Macron offered him the opportunity to pursue one through negotiation, provided that the JCPOA stayed in place. DESPITE ALL THIS EVIDENCE and all these efforts, Trump WITHDREW from the Iran deal in May of 2018 and started reimposing sanctions.
Few recent presidential decisions have been proved to be so spectacularly wrong in such a short period of time.
Trump said that in withdrawing from the JCPOA, he would be in a stronger position to stop Iran’s provocations across the Middle East. The opposite has proved to be the case. Iran has already resumed aspects of its nuclear program that were restricted under the JCPOA. And over the past year alone, Iran or its proxies have shot down a U.S. drone, harassed and seized oil tankers, bombed Saudi oil infrastructure, killed unarmed protesters, and resumed rocket attacks against U.S. interests in Iraq. During the implementation of the Iran deal, by contrast, there wasn’t a single such rocket attack from a Shia militia. Trump initiated the escalatory cycle that led us to this extraordinarily dangerous moment.
It is ironic that the killing of Qassem Soleimani could put the final nail in the coffin of the Iran deal. In the Obama White House, we assessed that Soleimani opposed the JCPOA, and that he led a hard-line flank that viewed the Iranian foreign minister who conducted the negotiations with suspicion. This view was often mocked by Iran-deal opponents, who declared that there was no distinction between hard-liners and more moderate Iranian officials. Indeed, U.S. hawks regularly foreclose opportunities for diplomacy by wrongly seeing the government of any adversary as a monolith. But now, in the wake of Soleimani’s assassination, that debate is largely moot: As mourners flood the streets, all of Iran’s leaders are consolidating around a harder line, vowing to chase the United States out of the region.
We have already seen the consequences of this latest escalation in Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign come into focus. Iraqi leaders are demanding that we leave their country, after Americans sacrificed thousands of lives and spent more than $1 trillion there;
new restrictions are inhibiting the fight against ISIS;
Iran is casting off the remaining limits on its nuclear program.
In the months and years to come, we should expect renewed attacks against U.S. interests—and Americans—from Iran and its proxies.
In contrast to the international unity that enabled the achievement of the JCPOA, Trump’s abandonment of it has alienated the United States from our closest allies.
And in his other signature foreign-policy initiative—negotiations with North Korea—Kim Jong Un is pushing forward with his own nuclear and missile programs, perhaps having drawn the lesson that you cannot trust the United States to keep a nuclear deal.
In response, Trump and his chief lieutenant on Iran—Secretary of State Mike Pompeo—have sought to deflect blame to the JCPOA. While blaming the Iran deal for the consequences of Trump pulling out of the Iran deal is absurd, this argument should come as no surprise. Trump’s Iran policy was formulated in opposition to Obama, not with an eye toward actual governing. His is a worldview that relies on false charges, hyperbolic rhetoric, and assertions of strength as an end in itself, and not as a means to achieving something. At a Cabinet meeting last year, Trump sat at the table with a Game of Thrones–style poster that read “Sanctions are coming,” as if it were all just a movie, and not real life.
By contrast, the Iran deal was designed to address reality, and discharge the responsibilities of governing.
Like any such effort, it was imperfect, and left all parties dissatisfied.
For the Iranians, it was flawed because it didn’t lift all sanctions; it did, however, offer relief from certain sanctions and the prospect of further relief if Iran continued to comply.
For us, it was flawed because the JCPOA’s most effective restrictions on the Iranian nuclear program expired in 10 or 15 years—but that was 10 or 15 more years of assurance than having no deal in place, and further negotiations that built upon the JCPOA were always an available option.
Finally, the JCPOA didn’t stop Iran’s ballistic-missile program or its support for terror in the Middle East; however, the JCPOA did ensure that a regime that has ballistic missiles and supports terror was verifiably prohibited from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
That was the whole point.
You don’t make nuclear deals like that with your friends.
Indeed, imagine how the current crisis would feel if Iran already had nuclear weapons.
Governing isn’t about making demands on other countries that will never be achieved just because they sound good back in Washington.
And the presidency certainly isn’t a movie.
When “sanctions are coming,” real people get hurt and terrible things can happen in the real world.
One legacy of the JCPOA is that it demonstrates the utility of a different approach.
TRUMP CAN THANK OBAMA
As Trump confronts the consequences of a crisis of his own creation, he can thank Obama for the fact that Iran doesn’t yet have the means to produce a nuclear weapon.
He can thank Obama for the fact that Iran’s nuclear program is set back from where it was in 2015.
He can thank Obama for the inspections regime that has functioned effectively.
By contrast, the result of Trump’s policy—designed for Fox News sets and campaign rallies—
has been a more hard-line Iranian politics,
an Iranian adversary that has stepped up its provocations,
and a newly unconstrained Iranian nuclear program.
Barack Obama did achieve a deal good enough to prevent his successor from having to go to war with Iran.
But now, despite all that work, a de facto state of war exists between the United States and Iran.
To keep his promise to kill an achievement of Obama’s, Donald Trump has been willing to break his promise to get us out of wars in the Middle East.
In doing so, he has tragically proved Obama right: The choice all along was between the Iran deal or an unconstrained Iranian nuclear program and some form of war.
Ben Rhodes you're such a fucking dumbass
the jackass that bragged about lying to the press and creating an echo chamber
I somehow messed up the beginning of the excellent article from THE ATLANTIC BY Ben Rhodes, former deputy national security director to Barack Obama.
It should have begun like this:
IDEAS
An Extraordinarily Dangerous Moment
To keep his promise to kill an achievement of Obama’s, Trump has been willing to break his promise to get us out of wars in the Middle East.
On a november night in 2013, Barack Obama delivered a statement about an interim nuclear deal that had just been reached, freezing Iran’s program in place. When he was done, I walked with him back to the entrance of his residence, watched by the stoic portraits of former presidents. “Congratulations,” I said. “You just made sure that we won’t have a war with Iran during your presidency.”
“That’s probably true,” he said, considering the question. “But I want to make sure that the next president doesn’t have to go to war either.
The article then continues.
Complying or not with a bad treaty only produces bad results
And this was a TERRIBLE treaty
And Ben Rhodes, seriously. Someone with less experience than even community organizer Obama and part of the OBAMA CRIME CARTEL. Unbelievable.
But did you see this:
The "pastor" would like the part where Gervais points out it was a good year for pedophile films.
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1214003226938351617
The article speaks for itself, Califool.
written by a braggadocios liar idiot
Brenden Sir Hublife Dilley
@DilleyShow
Nancy Pelosi and the treasonous Democrats were content staying on vacation forever...
That was until President Trump started blowing up their Iranian financiers. Now she and her cohorts are rushing back to Congress to preemptively surrender to Iran.
What a bunch of cowards.
Obama and Rhodes and the dems are strongly connected to the Iranian terrorists.
Juan Castro Endorses fellow Socialist Warren.
The sides are being taken the blood bathe has begun.
The many faces of the vial Jane.
Losing so often makes her pissy.
written by a braggadocios liar
No, it was written by Ben Rhodes, not Donald Trump.
oh so witty stupid ass old man
"I think we should hire a failed novelist who openly lied to the American people while pushing bribery of a terrorist regime to handle this
Ben Shapiro
Blogger caliphate4vr said...
oh so witty stupid ass old man
And Paula again tries to show what a tuff, big man he wants to be.....BWAAAAAAAA!!!! All brawn and no fucking brains....!!!! Funny coming from an old white southern asshole!!!!!!!
"I think we should hire a failed novelist who openly lied to the American people while pushing bribery of a terrorist regime to handle this
Ben Shapiro
i think 0linsky hired the failed romance novelist because at the time ben's brother david was the president of cBS news.
Bolton Says He Will Testify
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton issued a statement that he is willing to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump if he is subpoenaed.
Bolton is one of four Trump administration officials that Democrats listed as potential witnesses for the trial.
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton issued a statement that he is willing to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump if he is subpoenaed.
Private citizen RRB has issued a statement that he is willing to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump if he is subpoenaed.
RRB is quoted as saying "Fuck yeah. Why not? It's all a fucking charade anyway. Who in their right mind would pass up a chance to mock such a shitshow?"
After his statement it seems increasingly unlikely RRB will be called to testify after all.
i think 0linsky hired the failed romance novelist because at the time ben's brother david was the president of cBS news.
Sad part is the disdain Rhodes had for the American public were directly about stupid people like the pederast
heh:
Before this policy went into effect, illegal immigrant families knew that if they crossed the border and claimed asylum, they’d effectively get a free pass. Immigration officials would release them into the U.S. within 20 days, on the promise that they would show up for their court date months in the future. Few bother to return. This policy was dubbed “Catch and Release” for a reason.
Now, they must wait in Mexico while immigration judges review their cases.
What “Remain in Mexico” revealed is how few asylum seekers have legitimate claims. In fact, judges granted asylum in less than 1% of the more than 10,000 MPP claims resolved so far, according to TRAC Research Center at Syracuse University.
The impact of this program has been little short of profound.
The number of apprehensions at the southwest border plummeted from 144,000 in May 2019 to just 42,649 in November – the last month for which the government has data. The number of families caught crossing illegally went from 84,486 in May to a mere 9,000 in November.
As the El Paso Times put it, “the policy has proved to be a virtual wall.”
https://issuesinsights.com/2020/01/06/trump-is-quietly-winning-bigly-at-the-border/
Richard Grenell
@RichardGrenell
replying to Ben Rhodes
Iran was NOT complying. They were telling you they were and if you believed them then you ignored the clear violations found and the massive amount of information the Israelis discovered in a storage locker. You were duped. And still ignore these discoveries.
of course the waterboy will trust Iran and political_liar and Rhodes over Grenell and Israel.
The Details of The Trump Approved plan are wonderful.
Reaper Drone
delivering He'll Fire Missles
Winning
No explaining why Obimbo calls his life Partner Mike.
Funny shit.
Ilhan Omar voted 2019's antisemite of the year
LOL
Qassem Soleimani’s dead body flies coach back to Iran
He didn't need the leg room.
ABC News Report "Soleimani's Body was driven thru the Streets"
No hardly. Fakest of Fake news.
US Army Tells Iraq It Is Preparing To "Move Out" Out Of "Respect For Sovereignty"
Cali, I hope US Gets Out.
Let these tribal Towelhead continue to war with each other.
IRAN Mouth Piece
Ilhan Omar
✔@IlhanMN
Trump needs to immediately divest from his businesses and comply with the emoluments clause. Iran could threaten Trump hotels *worldwide* and he could provoke war over the loss of revenue from skittish guests.
His business interests should not be driving military decisions.
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
Cali, I hope US Gets Out.
The goat fucker and dumb fuck Paula come to their senses 16 years after advocating going in because of the imminent threat!!!!!!.....dayum that is highly amusing!!!!!!!
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
No explaining why Obimbo calls his life Partner Mike.
No explaining why the goat fucker is dumber than a box of rocks....!!!!!!
oh look a dwarf fight
"Presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg (D) said it is “outrageous” to describe the death of Iran’s top terror chief as an “assassination” — a description used by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)."
This Mule Face Slut is a perfect Socialist.
"Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) accused President Trump of engaging in a “war crime” for responding to Iran’s threats with forceful warnings, referring to him as an “authoritarian” who wants to “erase history” and calling him a “monster” over the weekend."
Ilhan Omar voted 2019's antisemite of the year
rag-shida tlaib must be PISSED.
Ilan Omar voted 2019's antisemite of the year
BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!!! And you win fucking asshole of the year going away!!!!!!!!!
Trump Administration Blocks Iran’s Foreign Minister
January 6, 2020 at 4:22 pm EST
“The Trump administration is barring Iran’s top diplomat from entering the United States this week to address the United Nations Security Council about the U.S. assassination of Iran’s top military official in Baghdad, VIOLATING THE TERMS OF A 1947 HEADQUARTERS AGREEMENT REQUIRING WASHINGTON TO PERMIT FOREIGN OFFICIALS INTO into THE COUNTRY TO CONDUCT U.N. BUSINESS,” Foreign Policy reports.
______________
SO TRUMP NOW THINKS HE'S THE DICTATOR OF THE WORLD
Move the UN turn it into condos. Bunch of feckless fucks like donks
Pentagon Walks Back Letter on Troops In Iraq
January 6, 2020 at 5:09 pm EST
Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley told CNN that a letter suggesting the U.S. would withdraw troops from Iraq was released by mistake and poorly worded, adding “that’s not what’s happening.”
Said Milley: “It’s an honest mistake… it should not have been sent.”
_____________
These days Trump and his KEYSTONE COPS administration can't seem to get anything right.
Soleimani’s death leaves Iran’s strategy in tatters
By killing Soleimani, the US has decapitated the principal agent of Tehran’s strategy for regional hegemony.
Romney Would ‘Like to Hear’ from John Bolton
January 6, 2020 at 5:06 pm EST
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) told CNN that “of course” he would like to hear from former National Security Adviser John Bolton during the upcoming impeachment trial.
Said Romeny: “I’d like to hear what he has to say.”
These days Trump and his KEYSTONE COPS administration can't seem to get anything right.
general salami-mommy was not available for comment, however it has been reported that he is enjoying the most serene coach accomodations on RAGHEAD AIR back to shithole-istan.
Califool's 4:39 is from ARAB NEWS.
Wicki:
Arab News is an English-language daily newspaper published in Saudi Arabia. It is published from Riyadh. Described by many political observers as a propaganda tool for the Saudi leadership, the paper has come under heavy criticism for its controversial take on many issues pertaining against Saudi Arabia, most notably with the Yemeni Civil War and of the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi (purportedly carried out by the Saudi high-level leadership).
____________
Cali reads it religiously and believes every word it prints.
"It's impossible to overstate the significance of the attack that takes out Qassem Soleimani and the number two militia leader in Iraq as well, who also never dared to set foot in Iraq during the surge after we've missed him and he escaped," Petraeus said on "Face the Nation," referencing Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. "So this is bigger than bin Laden. It's bigger than Baghdadi.
What’s a wicki, dumbass
Wiki, Califool.
Bolton’s Testimony Would Be Damning to Trump
New York Times:
“Former White House officials and people close to Mr. Bolton have indicated that his testimony would likely be damning to Mr. Trump and put additional pressure on moderate Republicans to consider convicting him.
“That could fundamentally change the dynamics around the impeachment trial in the Senate, where a two-thirds vote — 67 senators — is needed to remove Mr. Trump. Democrats, the minority party, control 45 seats.”
Heshmat Alavi
@HeshmatAlavi
Jan 5 - Nasiriyah, southern #Iraq#Iran-backed militias open fire on civilians refusing to attend a ceremony for the now dead IRGC Quds Force chief Qasem Soleimani.
All the while, @nytimes will describe him as a "popular general."
https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1214150714261413889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1214150714261413889&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2020%2F01%2Fhorror-iranian-militias-open-fire-on-civilians-refusing-to-go-to-ceremony-for-dead-terrorist-soleimani-video%2F
lovely people, the iranians.
Pelosi Says GOP Has ‘Run Out of Excuses’
Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a statement about John Bolton’s offer to testify in a Senate impeachment trial:
"The President and Sen. McConnell have run out of excuses. They must allow key witnesses to testify, and produce the documents Trump has blocked, so Americans can see the facts for themselves.
"The Senate cannot be complicit in the President’s cover-up."
_____________
Rachel Bade:
“Quite amazing. A seismic shift in leverage. Before just two hours ago, most Republicans and even Democrats privately thought Schumer and Pelosi would send the articles with no witness agreement since McConnell had the upper-hand. Bolton just changed all that.”
New York Times:
“Former White House officials and people close to Mr. Bolton...
as denny likes to say -
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
the old grey whore is just making it up out of whole cloth these days.
They must allow key witnesses to testify, and produce the documents Trump has blocked, so Americans can see the facts for themselves.
would someone please inform this wretched old cunt that she has ZERO constitutional authority over the senate.
Iran Officials Hint at Attacks on Trump Properties
“Senior Iranian officials are using Twitter to hint at threats against President Trump’s properties — including his Mar-a-Lago Club resort in Florida and Trump Tower in Manhattan — over the killing of Iran’s top military commander,” the New York Post reports.
______________
RAT, BE SURE TO GET A ROOM IN THE TRUMP TOWER, TOP FLOOR.
Why isn't Trump ENCOURAGING Bolton to testify?
"We responded with strength, not fear,” former U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley wrote Friday, praising President Donald Trump’s authorization of an airstrike that killed a top Iranian military commander.
Late Thursday night, following the news that a U.S. airstrike had killed Senior Iranian Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani, Haley commented on Twitter that she is proud of Trump’s strength and decision to take appropriate action against “an arch terrorist with American blood on his hands”:
Palsy delivered The Impeachy Thingy ?
Many on both sides of the isle see Mrs. Nikki Haley as a Strong Presidential Canidate someday.
James (the political_lire waterboy and lying POS "pastor"said) said...
Why isn't Trump ENCOURAGING Bolton to testify?
Maybe he is, be careful what you wish for... he's played the dems like Lucy plays Charlie Brown with the football. How many "bombshells" so far???
ROFLMFAO !!!
Former CIA Director David Petraeus said Sunday it's "impossible to overstate" the importance of the U.S. drone strike early Friday that killed Qassem Soleimani, Iran's top military commander, calling it "bigger" than the death of Osama bin Laden.
"It's impossible to overstate the significance of the attack that takes out Qassem Soleimani and the number two militia leader in Iraq as well, who also never dared to set foot in Iraq during the surge after we've missed him and he escaped," Petraeus said on "Face the Nation," referencing Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. "So this is bigger than bin Laden. It's bigger than Baghdadi.
Why haven't the Republicans heartily accepted Bolton's offer to testify? They've been saying all along that they want real witnesses to what Trump actually said and did, and when he said and did it.
Washington Post vs. the Steele Dossier
In a compelling, if incomplete, account of some of the worst media actors in the Russian collusion hoax, the Washington Post neglects its own complicity.
In the thick catalog of media players responsible for promoting the phony Russia collusion storyline, the Washington Post occupies a marquee spot. The Post arguably inflicted the most damage on the first few months of Donald Trump’s presidency by pushing the concocted collusion drama even before Inauguration Day.
The Post first published illegally leaked classified information about former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in early 2017; articles detailing Flynn’s intercepted conversations with the Russian ambassador led to Flynn’s ouster in February 2017.
In April 2017, the Post first revealed the foreign intelligence surveillance warrant on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page. Several unnamed government officials leaked the explosive news that a former Trump campaign advisor was under government surveillance for his suspected ties to the Kremlin. The purpose of the report was to legitimize the rapidly unfolding narrative that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russians to hijack the 2016 election.
Since then, thousands of articles, columns, and editorials bolstering the hoax have dominated the paper’s website. In fact, Post reporters and editors met with dossier author Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson months before Election Day as they attempted to plant damaging stories about Team Trump’s canoodling with Russians.
After Steele’s name became public in early 2017, the Post routinely portrayed Steele as a trustworthy “former British intelligence officer” just trying to protect Americans from the Putin puppet running for president.
…
Scott Shane, a Times reporter on the collusion beat, told Wemple that the paper once considered posting an extended annotation of the dossier to compare reality with fiction. “We just found that there wasn’t enough certainty about the facts to really make that possible,” Shane told Wemple.
Or, in other words, they knew the dossier was loaded with garbage but didn’t want to expose its illegitimacy because it would have helped Trump and discredited the Mueller probe.
https://amgreatness.com/2020/01/02/washington-post-vs-the-steele-dossier/
real reporting on FAKE NEWS Washington Post.
James (the political_lire waterboy and lying POS "pastor") said...
Why haven't the Republicans heartily accepted Bolton's offer to testify? They've been saying all along that they want real witnesses to what Trump actually said and did, and when he said and did it.
Everyone knows the dems are now just stalling their URGENT impeachment because they don't have shit and are hoping for a HAIL MARY..
They've voted, now pass it on.
What cowards Nancy and the Dems are. And dishonest.
KansasDemocrat said...
Former CIA Director David Petraeus said Sunday it's "impossible to overstate" the importance of the U.S. drone strike early Friday that killed Qassem Soleimani, Iran's top military commander, calling it "bigger" than the death of Osama bin Laden.
"It's impossible to overstate the significance of the attack that takes out Qassem Soleimani and the number two militia leader in Iraq as well, who also never dared to set foot in Iraq during the surge after we've missed him and he escaped," Petraeus said on "Face the Nation," referencing Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis. "So this is bigger than bin Laden. It's bigger than Baghdadi.
so naturally the dishonest dems and FAKE NEWS attack Trump over this and support Iran over America.
disgusting how they act.
Re: 5:14 PM
"American Greatness" is rated an extreme Right source.
Bolton, if he tells the simple truth, could prove to be a very effective HAIL MARY witness.
ار
@MaajidNawaz
replying to Ben Rhodes
I’m liberal. You’re a disgrace. You insisted Obama standby as ISIS devils arose&enslaved Yazidis. You ignored Syrian slaughter by Soleimani,to appease Iranian theocrats. Assad’s chemical weapons exposed your BS “red line”. You betrayed secular Persians&Arabs. You’re weak. STFU
https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1214242100004433923
James said...
"American Greatness" is rated an extreme Right source.
James is considered an extreme Left source.
as is all the water he carries.
James is considered an extreme Left source.
Extreme stupid source is more accurate
James said...
Bolton, if he tells the simple truth, could prove to be a very effective HAIL MARY witness.?
Umm Bolton wants to attack Iran... and strongly approved of Trump in other areas... If Bolton and Schiff and the "whistleblower" were the last and final witnesses I say go for it.
of course I would expect to hear from at least 2 of these under oath in the future regardless.
Caliphate4vr said...
James is considered an extreme Left source.
Extreme stupid source is more accurate
You're right, I was just trying to be nice.
Someone want to explain what a "Hail Mary" is to the effeminate Jane.
We warned you Socialist Democrats.
😁
Voters’ opinions of swing district Democrats soured as they learned that their representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump, according to a poll released Monday.
An American Action Network (AAN) survey, conducted by NMB Research, found that a majority of likely voters across New York’s 22nd Congressional District, South Carolina’s 1st Congressional District, and New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District grew a more unfavorable opinion of their representative after they learned about their Democrat representatives’ vote to impeach the president.😋
Post a Comment