Pelosi is pretending this impeachment is historic. But as one commentator pointed out, the third time for something is no longer historic and memorable. For example, name the third person to walk on the moon.
What will be historic is when this impeachment is quickly defeated and Trump wins reelection just months later.
When in doubt, make up another conspiracy theory to bolster your failing policies and regime!!!!!! The old white man party flailing like a drowning rat!!!!
WASHINGTON — The first version of the conspiracy theory was hatched on Twitter on Jan. 10.
“Don’t rule out that the reason Pelosi hasn’t sent impeachment to the Senate is to hurt Warren and Sanders, and to help Biden,” Ari Fleischer, a former White House press secretary for President George W. Bush, tapped out on his iPad. “By timing the trial so it takes place during the Iowa lead-up, she has leverage over the liberals.”
Fleischer’s message was retweeted 1,400 times.
Seven days later, Fleischer’s theory that Speaker Nancy Pelosi was attempting to influence the Democratic primary — for which there is no evidence — was being promulgated by President Donald Trump.
“They are rigging the election again against Bernie Sanders, just like last time, only even more obviously,” Trump tweeted Friday, claiming his Senate trial was designed to keep Sanders, the Vermont senator, grounded in Washington instead of campaigning in Des Moines, Iowa, ahead of the Feb. 3 caucuses.
“Crazy Nancy thereby gives the strong edge to Sleepy Joe Biden, and Bernie is shut out again,” the president added.
An idea that caught fire on Twitter and became grist for Trump demonstrates how the same echo chamber of right-wing media that boosted him in 2016 is exerting its power again just before the first primary votes are cast in 2020.
There was nothing new in terms of the process that got the idea in front of Trump. But the evolution from online conspiracy theory to Fox News fodder to presidential talking point demonstrated how a world of conservative influencers, Republican lawmakers and online media outlets can drive disinformation through repetition and amplification.
Two days after Fleischer’s tweet, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, appeared on Maria Bartiromo’s show on Fox News and repeated it. “This is the dirty little secret nobody is talking about: why the Speaker held these papers,” McCarthy said Sunday. “This benefits Joe Biden. This harms Sen. Sanders, who is in first place and could become their nominee.”
In fact, Sanders is not the national front-runner for the nomination and never has been, although he had a narrow lead in a recent poll of likely Iowa caucusgoers. But Trump’s reelection campaign in recent weeks has been seeking to elevate Sanders, viewing the self-described democratic socialist as the president’s ideal Democratic opponent in November.
The Trump camp, in turn, is worried about Biden’s competitiveness against the president in Midwestern battleground states, and would like to do anything possible to trip up the moderate former vice president in his tight primary race against the liberal Sanders.
one commentator pointed out, the third time for something is no longer historic and memorable. For example, name the third person to walk on water like trump......
The ball less loser grasping at straws trying to minimize the fact the the 3rd impeachment which never goes away, will soil what is left of the old white mans party as they follow the asshole off a cliff......BWAAAAAAAAAAA
The one that is flat wrong is the Democrats' assertion that Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate "a debunked conspiracy theory that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 presidential election to aid President Trump, but instead that Ukraine interfered in that election to aid President Trump's opponent, Hillary Clinton."
The problem is, the theory does not hold that Russia "did not interfere" in the 2016 election. There is a mountain of evidence that Russia interfered, and that has been the conclusion of every investigation into the matter, beginning with the first congressional probe, by the House Intelligence Committee under then-chairman Devin Nunes. The theory is that in addition to Russian interference, some people in Ukraine, including some government officials, alsotried to influence the U.S. election. It was not a government-run effort, and it was on a far smaller scale than the Russian project, but it happened.
The other mischaracterization in the Democratic brief is the assertion that in 2016 Trump "welcomed Russia's election interference." The brief quotes Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller's report that the Trump campaign welcomed Russian help because it "expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts."
That's not wrong -- Trump did in fact welcome Russia-based leaks -- but grossly out of context. The context is this: Trump welcomed Russia-based leaks about the Clinton campaign because the entire media was enthusiastically embracing and repeating Russian-based leaks about the Clinton campaign. Print, internet, TV -- everyone -- was accepting, repeating, and amplifying the material released by WikiLeaks from the Russian hack of top Clinton campaign official John Podesta.
One thing wrong with your POS cramps is the trump assertion that Ukraine interfered was to change the narrative that russia did!!!!!!!
And you fell for it hook line and sinker.....BWAAAAAAAAA!!!! Opinions are like assholes.....and you and your minions have floated thousands of excuses for trump behavior......sad
The theory is that in addition to Russian interference, some people in Ukraine, including some government officials, alsotried to influence the U.S. election. It was not a government-run effort, and it was on a far smaller scale than the Russian project, but it happened.
Don't confuse the liberals. In addition requires multiple layers of thought process.
Still LOL@Jane/Dopie "James January 18, 2020 at 8:18 AM
Who is Jane? Can't be me, 'cause I have not posted one single word about McSally.
KD lies. Again. Again. Again."
"James January 16, 2020 at 11:26 AM
GOP Senator Calls Reporter a ‘Liberal Hack’
Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) dismissed a CNN reporter as a “liberal hack” and refused to answer questions when asked about new claims that President Trump was involved in a pressure campaign in Ukraine."
WILL BE ANOTHER TREMENDOUS ONE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!
and a chance to start getting this hoax impeachment over. The closer that gets the louder the dems screams will be. You can see it here. What happened to somber?
Not Even 6th Grade Debate Teams are allowed to use them as a citeable source . "Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by the people who use it. It is a special type of website designed to make collaboration easy, called a wiki. Many people are constantly improving Wikipedia, making thousands of edits every minute."
rade Debate Teams are allowed to use them as a citeable source
BWAAAAAAAA!!!! Which proves what goat fucker......that you are an idiot?????? Works for me!!!!! Funny you think breitbart and PJ Media are ......LOLOLOLOLOLOL~!!!!!!!
The goat fucking idiot still cannot provide the actual cite the he claims james posted.....Again, he lies and changes the subject because that is all he is capable of.....>BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!!
No wonder lo iq never even got an elementary educationF
Fucking coward can't find his own ass in the dark.....>BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Most amusing thinking that your shit don't stink like most of the old white men here that have lost their manhood to trump......LOLOLOLOLO God you are a stupid fuck!!!!
21 comments:
Pelosi is pretending this impeachment is historic. But as one commentator pointed out, the third time for something is no longer historic and memorable. For example, name the third person to walk on the moon.
What will be historic is when this impeachment is quickly defeated and Trump wins reelection just months later.
When in doubt, make up another conspiracy theory to bolster your failing policies and regime!!!!!! The old white man party flailing like a drowning rat!!!!
WASHINGTON — The first version of the conspiracy theory was hatched on Twitter on Jan. 10.
“Don’t rule out that the reason Pelosi hasn’t sent impeachment to the Senate is to hurt Warren and Sanders, and to help Biden,” Ari Fleischer, a former White House press secretary for President George W. Bush, tapped out on his iPad. “By timing the trial so it takes place during the Iowa lead-up, she has leverage over the liberals.”
Fleischer’s message was retweeted 1,400 times.
Seven days later, Fleischer’s theory that Speaker Nancy Pelosi was attempting to influence the Democratic primary — for which there is no evidence — was being promulgated by President Donald Trump.
“They are rigging the election again against Bernie Sanders, just like last time, only even more obviously,” Trump tweeted Friday, claiming his Senate trial was designed to keep Sanders, the Vermont senator, grounded in Washington instead of campaigning in Des Moines, Iowa, ahead of the Feb. 3 caucuses.
“Crazy Nancy thereby gives the strong edge to Sleepy Joe Biden, and Bernie is shut out again,” the president added.
An idea that caught fire on Twitter and became grist for Trump demonstrates how the same echo chamber of right-wing media that boosted him in 2016 is exerting its power again just before the first primary votes are cast in 2020.
There was nothing new in terms of the process that got the idea in front of Trump. But the evolution from online conspiracy theory to Fox News fodder to presidential talking point demonstrated how a world of conservative influencers, Republican lawmakers and online media outlets can drive disinformation through repetition and amplification.
Two days after Fleischer’s tweet, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, appeared on Maria Bartiromo’s show on Fox News and repeated it. “This is the dirty little secret nobody is talking about: why the Speaker held these papers,” McCarthy said Sunday. “This benefits Joe Biden. This harms Sen. Sanders, who is in first place and could become their nominee.”
In fact, Sanders is not the national front-runner for the nomination and never has been, although he had a narrow lead in a recent poll of likely Iowa caucusgoers. But Trump’s reelection campaign in recent weeks has been seeking to elevate Sanders, viewing the self-described democratic socialist as the president’s ideal Democratic opponent in November.
The Trump camp, in turn, is worried about Biden’s competitiveness against the president in Midwestern battleground states, and would like to do anything possible to trip up the moderate former vice president in his tight primary race against the liberal Sanders.
one commentator pointed out, the third time for something is no longer historic and memorable. For example, name the third person to walk on water like trump......
The ball less loser grasping at straws trying to minimize the fact the the 3rd impeachment which never goes away, will soil what is left of the old white mans party as they follow the asshole off a cliff......BWAAAAAAAAAAA
Two deceptions at heart of Democrats' impeachment brief
The one that is flat wrong is the Democrats' assertion that Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate "a debunked conspiracy theory that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 presidential election to aid President Trump, but instead that Ukraine interfered in that election to aid President Trump's opponent, Hillary Clinton."
The problem is, the theory does not hold that Russia "did not interfere" in the 2016 election. There is a mountain of evidence that Russia interfered, and that has been the conclusion of every investigation into the matter, beginning with the first congressional probe, by the House Intelligence Committee under then-chairman Devin Nunes. The theory is that in addition to Russian interference, some people in Ukraine, including some government officials, alsotried to influence the U.S. election. It was not a government-run effort, and it was on a far smaller scale than the Russian project, but it happened.
The other mischaracterization in the Democratic brief is the assertion that in 2016 Trump "welcomed Russia's election interference." The brief quotes Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller's report that the Trump campaign welcomed Russian help because it "expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts."
That's not wrong -- Trump did in fact welcome Russia-based leaks -- but grossly out of context. The context is this: Trump welcomed Russia-based leaks about the Clinton campaign because the entire media was enthusiastically embracing and repeating Russian-based leaks about the Clinton campaign. Print, internet, TV -- everyone -- was accepting, repeating, and amplifying the material released by WikiLeaks from the Russian hack of top Clinton campaign official John Podesta.
One thing wrong with your POS cramps is the trump assertion that Ukraine interfered was to change the narrative that russia did!!!!!!!
And you fell for it hook line and sinker.....BWAAAAAAAAA!!!! Opinions are like assholes.....and you and your minions have floated thousands of excuses for trump behavior......sad
Now go read the Wikipedia article
"Trump-Ukraine Scandal"
If you're recommending it James, then I'm sure it's a propaganda piece.
hen I'm sure it's a propaganda piece.
LIKE EVERYTHING YOU POST INCLUDING THE LAST 6 EXCUSES ABOUT THE ASSASSINATION ????????
I don't need excuses for Trump taking out Soleimani. He was a threat to US personnel and innocent civilians in the Middle East.
It's good thing he's gone. And if you weren't so damned TDS infected, you would see it too.
List here what about the Wiki article is "propaganda."
The theory is that in addition to Russian interference, some people in Ukraine, including some government officials, alsotried to influence the U.S. election. It was not a government-run effort, and it was on a far smaller scale than the Russian project, but it happened.
Don't confuse the liberals. In addition requires multiple layers of thought process.
Still LOL@Jane/Dopie
"James January 18, 2020 at 8:18 AM
Who is Jane? Can't be me, 'cause I have not posted one single word about McSally.
KD lies. Again. Again. Again."
"James January 16, 2020 at 11:26 AM
GOP Senator Calls Reporter a ‘Liberal Hack’
Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) dismissed a CNN reporter as a “liberal hack” and refused to answer questions when asked about new claims that President Trump was involved in a pressure campaign in Ukraine."
Nuanced thinking is beyond them.
VERY FUNNY SUNDAY FUNNIES !!!
WHAT A GREAT WEEK WE HAD
CAN'T WAIT FOR NEXT WEEK !!!
WILL BE ANOTHER TREMENDOUS ONE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP !!!
and a chance to start getting this hoax impeachment over. The closer that gets the louder the dems screams will be. You can see it here. What happened to somber?
ROFLMFAO !!!
Not Even 6th Grade Debate Teams are allowed to use them as a citeable source .
"Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by the people who use it. It is a special type of website designed to make collaboration easy, called a wiki. Many people are constantly improving Wikipedia, making thousands of edits every minute."
Coward and major asswipe......wishing his life away since it is soooooo worthless......BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
CAN'T WAIT FOR NEXT WEEK !!!
rade Debate Teams are allowed to use them as a citeable source
BWAAAAAAAA!!!! Which proves what goat fucker......that you are an idiot?????? Works for me!!!!! Funny you think breitbart and PJ Media are ......LOLOLOLOLOLOL~!!!!!!!
KansasDemocrat said...
Still LOL@Jane/Dopie
The goat fucking idiot still cannot provide the actual cite the he claims james posted.....Again, he lies and changes the subject because that is all he is capable of.....>BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!!
"Not Even 6th Grade Debate Teams are allowed to use them as a citeable source ."
lo iq "anonymous responds:
BWAAAAAAAA!!!! Which proves what goat fucker......that you are an idiot?????? Works for me!!!!!
No wonder lo iq never even got an elementary education
But boy is he a source of humor, he writes his own insults on himself. Can't make this shit up !!!
ROFLMFAO at the lo iq twerp !!!
No wonder lo iq never even got an elementary educationF
Fucking coward can't find his own ass in the dark.....>BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Most amusing thinking that your shit don't stink like most of the old white men here that have lost their manhood to trump......LOLOLOLOLO God you are a stupid fuck!!!!
Thanks for being the board's laughing stock lo iq.
And we can always count on you coming back for more.
Totally clueless. as Nancy would say, FOREVER.
ROFLMFAO !!!
Post a Comment