Monday, May 25, 2020

Opps! Neither the facts or opinion of those who matter back up the Democratic hoax!

US was more prepared for pandemic than any other country, Johns Hopkins study found
The United States was ranked the best-prepared nation to deal with a pandemic late last year by the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHCHS), Fox News reported on Sunday.
 
The study appears to contradict claims by Democrats that the Trump administration had the country ill prepared for the coronavirus outbreak.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s “response has been excellent, as it has been in the past,” said John Auerbach, president of the nonpartisan Trust for America’s Health, which works with the government to improve the nation’s response to health crises.
Auerbach added that the CDC’s top scientific ranks have remained stable during the past three years, despite charges by some Democrats that the nation’s public health leadership has been decimated.
Separately, the Biden team has repeatedly argued that the president once referred to coronavirus as a "hoax." That claim has been refuted by numerous fact-checkers, including the Post's, which found that Trump was clearly referring to Democrats' efforts to blame him for the pandemic, not the virus itself.
Additionally, numerous Democrats, including Biden, have falsely claimed that the president cut the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) budget. The Associated Press has noted that those claims "distort" the facts.

Adding to the fact that the United States on paper has done the most testing, has a lower death rate than most of the first world countries, had one of the earliest responses, we can now add to this that the United States has been declared to have the overall "best" preparedness for this sort of crisis. The CDC (which leads our Federal response) has been considered excellent.

I can only imagine if this same study had come out when President Obama was still in charge, the media would have been fawning all over him and demanding we start adding a fifth head on the Mount Rushmore. Not to mentions our media would be spending 24/7 trying to prove that the same numbers we see today would be the greatest thing since jelly beans.

Let's be clear here. Those who argue that our "country" did the wrong thing by not shutting everything into a complete lock down are making an argument than has no valid empirical evidence to back up the premise. Nearly everywhere that our Governors took the draconian measures that the left desired, they ended up in total chaos and ended up with far more deaths than those states that did not take the harshest of measures.

Let's be even more clear. If not for the disaster in leadership in New York (both DeBlasio and Cuomo), our data would look considerably different and we would be one of the best countries in the world. But unfortunately these disasters exist. If you look at the Democratic states (led by New York and New Jersey) you would have a death rate of 417 deaths per million, placing that subsection of the country ahead of all but seven countries.

On the flip side, If you just take your states run by Republican Governors, you would have an overall death rate of 159 deaths per million, that would place us all the way down between Canada and Bermuda. If the rest of the country had been able to duplicate what DeSantis, Abbot and others accomplished, then we would be talking about the United States a success story.

But at the end of the day, your liberals really desperately want to blame the failures of the blue states on the actions of the red states, while likely believing that the actions of the blue states is somehow keeping our overall statistics down, in spite of the distinctly better results in red states.

This is the power of cognitive dissonance. Their own illusions of what is right and wrong, simply doesn't allow them to look at anything "objectively". Everything must be argued as a relative and subjective issue that can be best judged (not on results) but on opinions. It would be like watching an NFL football game and then throwing away the score at the end, and allowing for media and social media arguments to decide who best played the game and then determining a winner from a subjective standpoint.

To the degree that we needed a better solution, is lost on the misguided concept that doubling down on what hasn't worked was the key. It wasn't and as we learn more about the virus, we can objectively and scientifically see why it wasn't the key. The key was to do what DeSantis (and others) did in Florida, by very early on addressing the potential problems in nursing homes and with the most vulnerable, rather than just toss a blanket order over everything and call it good. Had we implicated a more thought out targeted plan, that used and adjusted for data as we learned it, we would have been way better off. But politics (and a flat rejection of science) seemed to pull the media (and Democrats) around by the ear.

The sad truth is this: The more conventional wisdom has pushed and still pushes something that runs 180 degrees from the factual reality, the worse off our country will be long term. The blatant attempts to win an argument that is lost as a matter of fact, has quite literally probably killed thousands of Americans who otherwise didn't have to die.

7 comments:

Myballs said...

It must give the lefties here great comfort to know that the agree with Ann coulter.

cowardly king obama said...


I see the NFL is tentatively planning on playing to full stadiums in August. I'm guessing with temperature checks on everyone in the stadium. Wouldn't hurt to not allow anyone over 60/65 in if there is still some doubt.

We should have isolated the vulnerable (not initially known) not the healthy. But that's what the science and data now show. And we should get back to work.

Just imagine the size of the Trump rallies while Joe works on fixing his podcast from his basement.

anonymous said...

Imagine if we were not prepared!!!!! Sure seems that study was overly optimistic !!!! BTW.....when was that study conducted cold hearted dumb fuck???????

cowardly king obama said...

lo iq wanted to know when was that study conducted, and called CHT a dumb fuck

Guess late in 2019 is too vague for him.

And he better look up the definition of dumb fuck. He's got it backwards.

ROFLMFAO !!!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Ann Coulter went on an early Sunday morning Twitter tear, calling President Donald Trump “the most disloyal actual retard that has ever set foot in the Oval Office.”

The far-right media pundit and former Trump defender was triggered by the president’s Friday tweet in which he called for Alabama voters to “not trust Jeff Sessions” and instead put their support behind Sessions’ Republican Senate seat challenger, football coach Tommy Tuberville.

“3 years ago, after Jeff Sessions recused himself, the Fraudulent Mueller Scam began. Alabama, do not trust Jeff Sessions. He let our Country down. That’s why I endorsed Coach Tommy Tuberville (@TTuberville), the true supporter of our #MAGA agenda!,” Trump tweeted.

And that set off Coulter, who called Trump a “moron,” “retard” and “lout,” who was incapable of “pretending to be” a “decent, compassionate human being.”

anonymous said...


Guess late in 2019 is too vague for him.


That's was the point you fucking loser....the report was dated and most likely in need of revision!!!!! Thanx for the help you dumb fuck and the fact Lil dumb fuck schitty did not include that date in his screed!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

JAMES'S FUCKING DADDY said...


During her two-decade career, Coulter has followed these rules carefully. She has accused a group of 9/11 widows of reveling in their husbands’ deaths; lamented that Timothy McVeigh didn’t park his truck in front of the New York Times building; argued that the increasing popularity of soccer in America is a sign of moral decay; and been fired from MSNBC for telling a disabled Vietnam veteran on air that people like him were to blame for losing the war. (She later said she didn’t know he was disabled.)

In response, Coulter has been described, variously, as a human submachine pistol (Lloyd Grove, Washington Post, 2002); a “paid banshee” and “self-drawn cartoon” (David Carr, New York Times, 2003); “She-Devil” (John Edwards, 2007); “Trump’s Aryan Witch Enforcer” (conservative critic Charlie Sykes, 2016); and “troll” (multiple citations).

Few consider Coulter a serious intellectual. But she’s a good debater – charismatic, dexterous, always ready with a talking point or quip. She also has an occasional, uncanny ability to sense political undercurrents that others miss.

In June 2015, three days after Donald Trump announced his candidacy for president, Coulter appeared on an episode of the Bill Maher show. She told him that, of the 17 Republican primary candidates, Trump was the one with the best chance of winning the White House. The room erupted in laughter. She then proceeded to tell an incredulous Maher that Bernie Sanders was the only Democrat who could beat Trump.

Guess it's now Sanders !!!

ROFLMFAO !!!