Biden Responds to Gallup’s ‘Better Off Now’ Survey by Attacking Voters
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden responded to the Gallup poll showing a majority of Americans saying they’re better off now than they were four years ago the only way Joe Biden knows how to: by attacking the respondents.
“Why should people who feel that they’re better off today under a Trump administration vote for you?” a reporter with Cincinnati’s WKRC Local 12 asked the former vice president.
“Well if they think that, they probably shouldn’t,” Biden initially responded…
“They think—54 percent of the American people believe they’re better off economically today than they were under our administration? Well, their memory is not very good, quite frankly,” Biden told reporter Kyle Inskeep, getting the stat wrong.
_______
Reality here folks... the only reason why 90% of Americans do not feel this way is because of the economic lock downs imposed by overzealous Governors who have sabotaged the economy (arguably on purpose).
But then again, perhaps Biden lives in a bubble where things "really" were better off when Obama, the media, and everyone in-between declared it impossible that our economy would ever do better than 1-2 percent growth and moderate wage growth.
The fact that 56% of people believe they are better off (in spite of Covid) tells us exactly how good the economy had been a year ago.
93 comments:
Trump is telling us the Chinese virus has been defeated.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/majority-of-voters-better-off-than-in-2016-poll
Hackers
The fact that 56% of people believe they are better off (in spite of Covid) tells us exactly how good the economy had been a year ago.
Pedo and Alky a question.
Were you as offended when your magic plastic Jesus called it MERS, as you are now when Trump says China virus?
Why should we be? I don't know what any magic plastic Jesus may have called it, but President Obama called it what both the CDC and the WHO called it, and handled it marvelously well.
the coronavirus so much as Trumpism itself.
No, they didn't.
Ron Kline on Biden's handling of the 2009 H1N1 virus: 'We did everything wrong. We were fortunate it wasn't a mass casualty event.
Biden said “They think—54 percent of the American people believe they’re better off economically today than they were under our administration?"
Trump has said that it's just going to disappear 100 times
Dementia squared
Yeas
"WASHINGTON (AP) _ Sen. Joe Biden claimed during a campaign appearance in New Hampshire last spring that he finished in the top half of his law school class, although records indicate he finished near the bottom.
In a videotape aired by the public service cable network C-SPAN several months ago, the Delaware Democrat was asked at a campaign stop in Claremont, N.H., on April 3 about what law school he attended and how well he did.
On the videotape, a clearly angered Biden told the questioner: ″I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do.
ADVERTISEMENT
″The first year in law school I decided I didn’t want to be in law school and ended up in the bottom two-thirds of my class and then decided I wanted to stay and went back to law school and in fact ended up in the top half of my class,″ he went on.
But last week Biden released his law school records showing he had graduated 76th in a law school class of 85. "
Joe Biden and Roger lie alike.
Live with it.
COVID-19 surges in 41 states;
3h ago
By USA Today
A third of U.S. states are reporting higher coronavirus case counts than they've ever had before.
A USA TODAY analysis of Johns Hopkins data shows 16 states set records for new cases in a week. But nearly all states are surging: 41 states had worse weeks than they did a week earlier. And an analysis of COVID Tracking Project data shows that in 36 states, a higher rate of people were testing positive...
Pure Scum Hirono. “Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?”
“No, Senator Hirono,” Barrett replied.
Hirono continued the interrogation by asking if Barrett had been ever legally involved as a party in a case concerning sexual assault.
“Have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?” Hirono asked.
“No, senator,” Barrett replied again.
Asking Amy Barrett if she is a Rapist.
This is your Modern Socialist Democrat.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Live with it.
COVID-19 surges in 41 states;
I can and will. I’m not old and feeble
Middle Eastern v China virus
You guys are such duplicitous hacks, it’s pitiful
Are you joining the herd?
Last month, at the request of The New York Times, three epidemiological teams calculated the percentage of the country that is infected. What they found runs strongly counter to the theory being promoted in influential circles that the United States has either already achieved herd immunity or is close to doing so, and that the pandemic is all but over. That conclusion would imply that businesses, schools and restaurants could safely reopen, and that masks and other distancing measures could be abandoned.
“The idea that herd immunity will happen at 10 or 20 percent is just nonsense,” said Dr. Christopher J.L. Murray, director of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which produced the epidemic model frequently cited during White House news briefings as the epidemic hit hard in the spring.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/10/13/world/coronavirus-covid
The President is not going to be happy!
Barr isn't going to lynch Obama!
Breaking news Nevertrump.
The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William P. Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing, according to people familiar with the matter.
The revelation that U.S. Attorney John Bash, who left the department last week, had concluded his review without criminal charges or any public report will rankle President Trump at a moment when he is particularly upset at the Justice Department. The department has so far declined to release the results of Bash’s work, though people familiar with his findings say they would likely disappoint conservatives who have tried to paint the “unmasking” of names — a common practice in government to help understand classified documents — as a political conspiracy.
The president in recent days has pressed federal law enforcement to move against his political adversaries and complained that a different prosecutor tapped by Barr to investigate the FBI’s 2016 investigation of his campaign will not be issuing any public findings before the election.
Legal analysts feared that Bash’s review was yet another attempt by Trump’s Justice Department to target political opponents of the president. Even if it ultimately produced no results of consequence, legal analysts said, it allowed Trump and other conservatives to say Obama-era officials were under scrutiny, as long as the case stayed active.
The department — both under Barr and Trump’s previous attorney general, Jeff Sessions — has repeatedly turned to U.S. attorneys across the country to investigate matters of Republican concern, distressing current and former Justice Department officials, who fear that department leaders are repeatedly caving to Trump’s pressure to benefit his allies and target those he perceives as political enemies.
6:57
Er... the question was about MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome).
I believe there were only two USA reported cases of it, stemming from Saudi Arabia, and not a single USA fatality.
HERE'S A SHORTER VERSION OF 7:51:
‘Unmasking’ Probe Quietly Ends Without, Charges
8:30 pm EDT
“The federal prosecutor appointed by Attorney General William Barr to review whether Obama-era officials improperly requested the identities of individuals whose names were redacted in intelligence documents has completed his work without finding any substantive wrongdoing,” the Washington Post reports.
TRUMP WON'T LIKE THAT.
WON'T LIKE THIS EITHER:
U.S. Says Trump Can’t Declassify Documents via Tweets
8:22 pm
Attorneys from the Department of Justice argued in court that President Trump’s tweets authorizing the “total declassification of any & all documents” related to the Russia investigation and Hillary Clinton’s emails should not be considered real declassification orders, Axios reports.
WHAT ARE THEY THINKING?
7:30 pm
Max Boot:
Trump is on track to be the first president since World War II to see a net loss of jobs during his term.
Even worse, he has presided over the loss of 214,000 lives and counting from covid-19.That’s already nearly four times the U.S. fatalities in the Vietnam War, previously the nadir of presidential bungling.
Even now, after having contracted covid-19 himself,
Trump refuses to take the pandemic seriously.
He keeps promising it will magically disappear of its own accord while holding rallies practically guaranteed to spread the disease.
As if that weren’t reason enough to vote for Biden,
there is also the fact that Trump has abused his power;
he was even impeached for doing so.
He has trafficked in racism and xenophobia.
He has incited violence.
He has kowtowed to dictators.
He has trashed our alliances.
He has welcomed Russian attacks on our elections.
He has locked children in cages.
He has called for his political opponents to be locked up.
He has, in sum, made a strong case that he is the worst president in our history.
Yet tens of millions of voters still support him.
What are they thinking?
‘Unmasking’ probe commissioned by Barr concludes without charges or any public report
By Matt Zapotosky and Shane Harris
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barr-unmasking-review-no-charges/2020/10/13/0f63fd2e-0d67-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html
I often do not agree with Pelosi,
but here I think she is more right than Blitzer is.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/10/13/pelosi_calls_cnns_blitzer_an_apologist_for_trump_you_dont_know_what_youre_talking_about.html
Approximately 42% still support the President. Many voters are still supporting Trump because they’re living in a hermetically sealed disinformation bubble that is impermeable to reality.
PMBlogger James said...
I often do not agree with Pelosi,
LOL you agree with her all the time.
She went into nuclear melt-down. Think what would have happen if an actual reporter questioned her.
Duck and cover
Senate Democrats are grilling Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett on hot-button issues like ObamaCare and the Nov. 3 election, but have struggled to pin down how she would rule on such cases if she’s confirmed later this month.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is just hours into two days of the question-and-answer portion of Barrett’s four-day confirmation hearing. Tuesday’s session alone is expected to last at least 11 hours.
Democrats are questioning Barrett on a litany of issues, including Roe v. Wade, LGBTQ rights, the outcome of the Nov. 3 election and the Affordable Care Act case slated for oral arguments before the Supreme Court on Nov. 10.
Advertisement
Barrett — while stressing that she would not bring a political agenda to the bench and had given no commitments to the White House about future rulings — sidestepped questions that attempted to reveal her legal thinking in some of the most divisive issues being discussed.
“I do want to be forthright and answer every question so far as I can. I think on that question I’m going to invoke Justice Kagan’s [answer], which I think is perfectly put. When she was in her confirmation hearing, she was not going to grade precedent, or give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down,” Barrett said, referring to Justice Elena Kagan, who was appointed to the Supreme Court by former President Obama in 2010, when asked about Roe.
Supreme Court nominees typically avoid weighing in on political questions, or issues that could come before the justices. Barrett, answering a question from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the top Democrat on the panel, at one point referenced the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose seat she would fill if confirmed by the Senate.
Advertisement
“Now Justice Ginsburg … used this to describe how a nominee should comport herself at a hearing: No hints, no previews, no forecast. That had been the practice of nominees before her but everybody calls it the Ginsburg rule because she stated it so concisely and it has been the practice of every nominee since,” Barrett said.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), during the committee's lunch break, said Barrett's answers are nonetheless revealing.
"So far she has perfected the art of non-answers. I think she has revealed that she is evading a lot of the tough questions," Blumenthal said.
Democrats are eager to have Barrett weigh in on health care, including the Affordable Care Act (ACA), as they put the issue at the forefront of the fight over her nomination.
"Now they think they have a winner to tilt the court not only on the Affordable Care Act but on reproductive freedoms and the sensible gun violence measures that states are passing,” Blumenthal told reporters on Tuesday morning.
Barrett said she was not “hostile” to the ACA, or any legislation passed by Congress.
Senators asked Barrett if she would recuse herself from the ACA case or a case involving the outcome of the Nov. 3 election, saying that President Trump’s comments on how he would expect his nominee to rule in both cases presented conflicts for her.
Barrett declined to say what she would do in those situations.
"It always happens after consultation with the full court, so I can't offer an opinion on recusal without short-circuiting that entire process," Barrett said.
Asked separately if the president had the authority to unilaterally delay the election, Barrett declined to say, adding that giving “off the cuff answers” would make her a “legal pundit.”
Duck and cover two
Barrett, however, did try to put space between herself and the White House about any cases that may reach the Supreme Court, noting she had never discussed the ACA or an election-related case with Trump or anyone else on his staff.
“I have had no conversation with the president or any of his staff on how I might rule in that case. It would be a gross violation of judicial independence for me to make any such commitment or for me to be asked about that case and how I would rule,” Barrett said.
“I also think it would be a complete violation of the independence of the judiciary for anyone to put a justice on the court as a means of obtaining a particular result,” she added.
Barrett added that for the same reason she did not make any commitments to the White House that she would also not make any pre-commitments during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
“It would be inconsistent with judicial independence,” she said.
Republicans defended Barrett and urged her to avoid tipping her hand on how she would decide a case.
“Policymaking is not the proper role of the judicial branch. That role is reserved for the legislative and executive branch. ... If you do lawmaking we can’t vote you out of office. Lawmaking is our job. If people don’t like what we do, they can vote us out of office,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).
Democrats tried to get Barrett to weigh in on a host of other issues, including LGBTQ rights, voting rights, racism and the Second Amendment.
Asked about the death of George Floyd, Barrett said it was “very, very personal,” referencing her own Black children, but declined to discuss the “nature of the problem.”
“Those things, you know, are policy questions, they’re hotly contested policy questions," she said. "So while I did share my personal experience … giving broader statements or making broader diagnosis about the problem is kind of beyond what I’m capable of doing as a judge."
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), however, replied, “I just don't believe you can be as passionate about originalism and the history behind language that we’ve had for decades if not centuries without having some thought about where we stand today.”
After a separate back-and-forth with Durbin on the Second Amendment and voting rights, Barrett interjected that she didn’t have an agenda.
“To the extent, Sen. Durbin, that you’re suggesting I have some sort of agenda on felon voting rights, or guns … or anything else, I can assure you and the committee, that I do not,” Barrett said.
Durbin replied that he was not implying that she had an agenda but that she comes to the Supreme Court “with life experiences.”
“You come to the Supreme Court having read a lot, I’m sure, and drawn some conclusions in your own mind,” he said. “That’s the point I’m making. There’s an individualism to this.”
She is not to be questioned.
She always throws a tantrum when challenged.
Amy was called a Rapist.
It was as low as a scum sub human Socialist Democrat can go.
A whole cloth accusation.
Scott you said that because only older people get sick and die from the covid-19 virus.
Biden was in Florida today and spoke to older voters, and reminded them that he doesn't care!
Your not helping Trump!
"Biden was in Florida today and spoke to older voters, and reminded them that he doesn't care"
Hit that do over button, alky.
The u.s. has a higher level risk than Sweden!The stubbornly high coronavirus death rate https://www.axios.com/united-states-coronavirus-death-rate-a40eb02b-bf8c-4146-8ef2-3cfd6b22de5b.html
“The idea that herd immunity will happen at 10 or 20 percent is just nonsense,” said Dr. Christopher J.L. Murray, director of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
uh, i hate to tell you this alky but UW's IHME was one of the very first "modelers" to get this whole covid thing very wrong very early on.
they're now in the category of laughingstock along with the imperial college of london.
nice try though.
Dr. Atlas on #Lockdowns:
History will record the faces of public health expertise, as some of the most sinful, egregious epic failures in the history of public policy. They have killed people, with their lack of understanding. The policy itself is a crime against humanity.
The Mayo Clinic is probably liberal according to rrb.
Natural infection
Herd immunity can also be reached when a sufficient number of people in the population have recovered from a disease and have developed antibodies against future infection. For example, those who survived the 1918 flu (influenza) pandemic were later immune to infection with the H1N1 flu, a subtype of influenza A. During the 2009-10 flu season, H1N1 caused the respiratory infection in humans that was commonly referred to as swine flu.
However, there are some major problems with relying on community infection to create herd immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19. First, it isn't yet clear if infection with the COVID-19 virus makes a person immune to future infection.
Research suggests that after infection with some coronaviruses, reinfection with the same virus — though usually mild and only happening in a fraction of people — is possible after a period of months or years. Further research is needed to determine the protective effect of antibodies to the virus in those who have been infected.
Even if infection with the COVID-19 virus creates long-lasting immunity, a large number of people would have to become infected to reach the herd immunity threshold. Experts estimate that in the U.S., 70% of the population — more than 200 million people — would have to recover from COVID-19 to halt the epidemic. If many people become sick with COVID-19 at once, the health care system could quickly become overwhelmed. This amount of infection could also lead to serious complications and millions of deaths, especially among older people and those who have chronic conditions.
How can you slow the transmission of COVID-19?
Until a COVID-19 vaccine is developed, it's crucial to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus and protect individuals at increased risk of severe illness, including older adults and people of any age with underlying health conditions.To reduce the risk of infection:
Avoid large events and mass gatherings.Avoid close contact (within about 6 feet, or 2 meters) with anyone who is sick or has symptoms.Stay home as much as possible and keep distance between yourself and others (within about 6 feet, or 2 meters) if COVID-19 is spreading in your community, especially if you have a higher risk of serious illness. Keep in mind some people may have the COVID-19 virus and spread it to others, even if they don't have symptoms or don't know they have COVID-19.Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol.Wear a cloth face covering in public spaces, such as the grocery store, where it's difficult to avoid close contact with others, especially if you're in an area with ongoing community spread. Only use nonmedical cloth masks — surgical masks and N95 respirators should be reserved for health care providers.Cover your mouth and nose with your elbow or a tissue when you cough or sneeze. Throw away the used tissue.Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth.Avoid sharing dishes, glasses, bedding and other household items if you're sick.Clean and disinfect high-touch surfaces, such as doorknobs, light switches, electronics and counters, daily.Stay home from work, school and public areas if you're sick, unless you're going to get medical care. Avoid public transportation, taxis and ride-sharing if you're sick.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/herd-immunity-and-coronavirus/art-20486808
Research suggests that after infection with some coronaviruses, reinfection with the same virus — though usually mild and only happening in a fraction of people — is possible after a period of months or years. Further research is needed to determine the protective effect of antibodies to the virus in those who have been infected.
Even if infection with the COVID-19 virus creates long-lasting immunity, a large number of people would have to become infected to reach the herd immunity threshold. Experts estimate that in the U.S., 70% of the population — more than 200 million people — would have to recover from COVID-19 to halt the epidemic. If many people become sick with COVID-19 at once, the health care system could quickly become overwhelmed.
You guys amuse me. You find right wing nutcase information about the covid 19 hoax
The President is desperate and I'm loving it is
The u.s. has a higher level risk than Sweden!
The US has a larger, older, more diverse population than Sweden or pretty much any other country in the world.
And the evidence shows that some genetic and cultural sub-groups of humans are more susceptible to the virus than others.
Age is a factor, so is obesity, auto-immune, and heatt disease. Also African, Asian, Native American and Mediterranean decent.
Research suggests
Translation; this is a wild-ass guess but will throw it out anyway to induce more fear and panic.
No legitimate researcher would ever use the term "research suggest" either there is evidence is there or not.
Brilliant strategy to lure seniors back to the fold.... a group he won by 6 in 2016 and now down 20!!!!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/14/trump-biden-meme-elderly-disabled/
Blogger Roger Amick said...
You guys amuse me. You find right wing nutcase information about the covid 19 hoax
nah, just pointing out the fact that many of your sources aren't just wrong, they're hilariously, galactically, stupendously wrong.
all while we have 16,500 scientists and medical professionals who signed a compact in Great Barrington MA declaring just how wrong you are.
you see alky, your problem right now with this covid bullshit is that the sun is setting on your ability to politicize it. it's politicization shelf life runs concurrent with the countdown to the election. and if Trump manages to win, you truly are going to be FUCKED, as the politicization of covid moving forward will have zero value. none.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The President is desperate and I'm loving it is
while the rest of us in the real world are loving your psychological projection.
Trump had over 100,000 turn out for his rally in Johnstown last night.
Biden gets a dozen at a rip. maybe two dozen.
now, you tell ME who's fucking desperate. it ain't Trump and it ain't his supporters.
Research suggests
Translation; this is a wild-ass guess but will throw i
BWAAAAAAAAA!!!! Research also suggests humans are responsible for GW and evolution is real!!!!!!! The non science cultist speaks!!!! LOLOLOLOLO
Other than media polls, there's no evidence of a big biden lead.
We Have Turned the Corner......Trump
Headline.....14 states cases surging and record hospitalizations!!!!!!!! Yep...he's got a great record of BULLSHIT!!!!!!!
Hey Ballz......there is plenty of evidence that the average lead is 10+ nationally, search real clear politics and you will be alarmed at the header!!!!!!!
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/trump-vs-biden-national-polls-2020-vs-2016/
Denny Burk
@DennyBurk
This answer from Amy Coney Barrett about how it feels to be nominated to the Supreme Court is incredible. It’s very sad and weighty, but also incredible. What a patriot and public servant. Outstanding.
VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/DennyBurk/status/1316027795181428746
FANTASTIC CHOICE !!!
great little video
Dumb fuck daddy cums in his hand by another idiotic non answer!!!!!!!!! Fantastic day for D's!!!!!!
POLITICO:
Trump at Risk of Getting Blown Out In Michigan
6:58 am
“Michigan is looking less competitive by the day, and there’s a growing likelihood of Joe Biden blowing out Donald Trump here come November 3. All three Rust Belt states that Trump improbably won in 2016 — Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — are problematic for the president this year. But Michigan is where things look bleakest.
“His support has diminished among the white working-class. Black turnout appears certain to rebound after a dismal showing in 2016. New laws that allow for early voting and no-excuse absentee balloting are expected to push voter participation to historic levels, with Democrats the expected beneficiary of low-propensity Michiganders flooding the ballot box. But the simplest explanation for the president’s trouble here is that he’s continuing to hemorrhage support from white, college-educated women in the suburbs of Detroit.
“It’s hard to overstate just how badly Trump is performing with this crucial demographic. Over the past several weeks, a raft of internal polls have produced numbers that political professionals here are struggling to comprehend.”
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:
Trump’s Drug Discount Cards Won’t Make Election
6:20 am
“President Trump’s plan to send 33 million Medicare beneficiaries a card that can be used to help pay for as much as $200 in prescription drug costs won’t be completed until after the election.
THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Minnesota Connects New Infections to Trump Rallies
6:16 am
“Facing a steep surge in coronavirus cases, health officials in Minnesota have connected two dozen virus cases to people who attended presidential campaign events in the past month, most of them attendees at airport rallies hosted by President Trump.”
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS:
Trump’s Travel Shows He’s Playing Defense
6:10 am
“President Trump is being forced to play Electoral College defense with a trip to Iowa, a state he won handily in 2016 but where Democrat Joe Biden is making a late push.
“Trump’s heavy travel this week, including his rally Wednesday in Des Moines, reflects his uphill climb three weeks before the election. He has already visited Pennsylvania and Florida and will head to another battleground state he likely can’t win without — North Carolina — as well as those he once thought were in his grasp but where recent polling shows Biden improving — Iowa and Georgia.”
Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad
Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to e-mails obtained by The Post.
The never-before-revealed meeting is mentioned in a message of appreciation that Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at a reported salary of up to $50,000 a month.
“Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure,” the e-mail reads.
An earlier e-mail from May 2014 also shows Pozharskyi, reportedly Burisma’s No. 3 exec, asking Hunter for “advice on how you could use your influence” on the company’s behalf.
The blockbuster correspondence — which flies in the face of Joe Biden’s claim that he’s “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings” — is contained in a massive trove of data recovered from a laptop computer.
continues:
https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/
No big deal.
Everyone already knows the Bidens are crooks.
Besides it's not really news unless the MSM covers it
I thought Joe said this was already completely investigated and debunked ????
C'mon man
Sara A. Carter
@SaraCarterDC
Hunter Biden Scandal:
Why are our elected democrat & republican representatives NOT looking at this latest trove of emails from #HunterBiden?
He was clearly leveraging his father's post to demand $$$$ for his "services."
What say you Joe Biden?
https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1316351392622276608
POLITICO:
Democrats Dominate Early Voting In Florida
“Republicans typically hold a slight edge in absentee ballot returns in Florida elections. But this year, there’s been a stunning development.
“For the first time ever at this stage of a general election, Democrats here are outvoting Republicans — and by a mammoth 384,000-vote margin through Tuesday.”
Quote of the Day
“I’m running against the single worst candidate in the history of presidential politics, and you know what that does? That puts more pressure on me… Can you imagine if you lose to a guy like this? It’s unbelievable.”
— President Trump, quoted by the New York Times at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania.
Battleground State Polls
From Ipsos:
MICHIGAN:
Biden 51%, Trump 43%
NORTH CAROLINA: Biden 48%, Trump 47%
From University of New Hampshire:
NEW HAMPSHIRE:
Biden 55%, Trump 43%
From RMG Research:
FLORIDA:
Biden 48%, Trump 46%
NORTH CAROLINA:
Biden 47%, Trump 45%
Vulnerable Republicans Tie Themselves to Barrett
CNN:
“Endangered Senate Republicans have a new running mate in the battle to keep their narrow majority: Amy Coney Barrett.
“As President Trump’s standing has deteriorated, they are aligning themselves closely with his Supreme Court nominee, hoping their aggressive push to confirm her to the bench before Election Day will be enough to energize their base, fill their campaign coffers and overcome the drag at the top of the ticket.”
Labor Secretary’s Wife Tests Positive
CNN:
“The Labor Department announced in a news release Tuesday night that Secretary Eugene Scalia’s wife, Trish, has tested positive for coronavirus,” CNN reports.
“Both Eugene and Trish Scalia attended the Rose Garden event where President Donald Trump announced Judge Amy Coney Barrett was his pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court. They were seated in the second row, directly behind first lady Melania Trump and next to former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway — both of whom would later test positive for Covid-19.”
NEW YORK TIMES:
Trump Will Hold Competing Town Hall
New York Times:
“NBC News confirmed on Wednesday that it would broadcast a prime-time town-hall-style event with Mr. Trump from Miami on Thursday at 8 p.m. Eastern, with the president fielding questions from Florida voters.
“The event will directly overlap with an already-scheduled ABC televised town-hall meeting with Mr. Biden in Philadelphia, which will begin at the same time.”
Where's Hunter ???
ROFLMFAO !!!
ara A. Carter
@SaraCarterDC
Hunter Biden Scandal:
The only straw you are grabbing dumb fuck is the one covered in SHIT!!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
BillStepien
@BillStepien
Oh, THERE’S Hunter...
https://twitter.com/BillStepien/status/1316362411486720001
ANOTHER question for Slo Joe.
Or is it Hiden Biden ???
Can't hide from the facts.
Obama/Biden criminals .
Elections are often an answer to the question: “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” If the answer is no, presidents can’t pass the buck upwards.
This is not Science.
"Research suggests ...."Alky
"“Are you better off now than you were four years ago?”
Answered: 53% said "Yes".
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/2020_elections_electoral_college_map_no_toss_ups.html
DO YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THAT, THIS LATE IN THE ELECTION, THIS STILL HAS NOT CHANGED?
(CHUCKLE.) THAT'S CORRECT!!!
KansasDemocrat said...
"“Are you better off now than you were four years ago?”
Answered: 53% said "Yes".
Actually it was 56 %
I'm sure it was considerably lower for TDS dems though.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/2020_elections_electoral_college_map_no_toss_ups.html
AND JUST IHOW MANY ELECTORAL VOTES WAS THAT?
BIDEN 358 TRUMP 180
Outstanding...JFD.
Why did Fake Pastor James run away?
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
Ugh: "Other material extracted from the computer includes a raunchy, 12-minute video that appears to show Hunter ... smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman, as well as numerous other sexually explicit images."
https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1316342919612297219
kind of like the HOAX "golden shower" dossier except with real video.
Might be tuff for Joe and the press to keep covered up...
AND THIS CLOSE TO THE ELECTION,
THIS HAS NOT CHANGED EITHER?
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/
THAT'S RIGHT!!!
(SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING:
Trumpsters should avoid scrolling down.
Might be bad for their hearts.)
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
Twitter Partisan Echo Chamber Snapshot:
The @nypost is trending for their new bombshell Biden story.
The NY Times @maggieNYT is trending for acknowledging the existence of the @nypost Biden story.
https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1316364136557707267
The twitter election interference "trending" department doesn't know what to do !!!
ROFLMFAO !!!
"The ‘Smoking Gun Email’ Story Doesn’t Add Up"
Taegan Goddard
New Battleground State Polls
From SurveyUSA:
GEORGIA:
Biden 48%, Trump 46%
From Suffolk University:
NEW HAMPSHIRE:
Biden 51%, Trump 41%
From EPIC-MRA:
MICHIGAN:
Biden 48%, Trump 39%
Kayleigh McEnany
@kayleighmcenany
BOMBSHELL
Hunter introduced Joe Biden to a top executive at the Ukrainian energy firm he received $50K/month from!
BIDEN: “I have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses. Period.”
@JoeBiden LIED. PERIOD
EMAIL:
https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1316357880052883456
So somehow Wray and the FBI had this for nearly a year and apparently did nothing ????
Obama Crime Cartel
"“Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” Fake Pastor James
Answered: 56% said "Yes".
This is looking amazingly good. :-)
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nc/north_carolina_trump_vs_biden-6744.html
Benny
@bennyjohnson
The Biden Family Is The Most Corrupt Family In American History
Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad
https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons
and includes video and pictures on computer drive !!!!
Erielle DavidsonGhost
@politicalelle
Pelosi let it slip that she doesn’t want to pass the COVID relief bill because she is upset Trump’s name will be on the checks. Millions of families praying for relief. And this is our Madame Speaker.
That’s what $24K IN FRIDGES full of $12 pints will do to you.
LOL She had better reasons than that.
LORI HENDRY
@Lrihendry
Saw Nancy out campaigning for Joe yesterday.
https://twitter.com/Lrihendry/status/1315981195734323200
God spoke
Trump Job Diapproval -9.6
9:04 God speaking again?
Juanita Broaddrick
@atensnut
Sen. Leahy is not too bright. He should have taken one of Barrett’s classes.
I see the POS "pastor" is not to bright either.
Now he's constantly clinging to his polls as well as his GODdard.
Just like 2016.
Remember "Trump will not be president"
ROFLMFAO !!!
* too
BLOOMBERG:
Election Lawyer Sees Low Chance of a Meltdown
“Benjamin Ginsberg, a longtime Republican election lawyer, puts the odds of the 2020 presidential election ending up in an all-out legal brawl that lasts into January at less than 1%."
AW, GEE. TRUMP WILL BE SO DISAPPOINTED.
THE RICHMOND TIMES DISPATCH:
Judge Extends Virginia Voter Registration Deadline
“A federal judge Wednesday extended the deadline for registering to vote until 11:59 p.m. Thursday in light of a construction accident that shut down the online voter registration system for several hours Tuesday.”
Benny
@bennyjohnson
This is the most atrocious display of the elite ruling class indifference to American suffering I have ever seen.
What a cancer.
Bravo for fighting back @wolfblitzer
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1316146832997842945
CNN is now worried about their future...
Mad Liberals
@mad_liberals
I'm shocked!!
I'd have thought that Hunter Biden's crack pipe would be gold plated crystal.
https://twitter.com/mad_liberals/status/1316361098019385346
Hunter smoked crack ???
Who could possibly have guessed ???
Oh dear. Trump is headed down even in Georgia.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/ga/georgia_trump_vs_biden-6974.html
Biden tells Florida Seniors that Trump Thinks They're "Expendable, Forgettable"
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-tells-florida-seniors-trump-thinks-they-re-expendable-forgettable-n1243234
Fucked daddy is cracked!!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Fake Pastor asked:
"“Are you better off now than you were four years ago?”
Answered: 56% said "Yes".
ON THE RCP NO TOSS UPS MAP
HAS THERE STILL BEEN NO CHANGE HERE?
Yes, there HAS been change!
BIDEN JUST GOT GEORGIA'S 16 VOTES BACK!!!
BIDEN 374 ===== ELECTORAL VOTES ===== TRUMP 164
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/2020_elections_electoral_college_map_no_toss_ups.html
Post a Comment