Thursday, November 26, 2020

Open mic - Iowa recount edition

Miller-Meeks up by eight votes with one county left to report (Clinton County). Previous reports from the Hart campaign of a nine vote swing in favor of the Democrat in Jasper county was actually only one vote when all is said and done. Scott county went ahead and reported their 26 vote swing in spite of their recounted totals adding up to 131 more ballots than the number of people who actually voted. 

Random person with same last name in front of a mic

Clinton County (about 24,000 votes total) still has 4000-5000 left to count, but have only found one vote in favor of Hart so far. One has to wonder why these 4000-5000 votes have been still "left to count" pretty much since Tuesday... and when exactly they plan to finish. Seems to me that you are simply providing time for something unusual to happen. There was no good reason to count 80% of your ballots and just leave the remaining 20% sitting out there for days while everyone else does their job and finishes.

20 comments:

Newt Gingrich said...

Laziness leads to sloppiness, and sloppiness is how the most brazen heist in American history is being exposed.

Stealing the 2020 election was a mammoth undertaking, involving widespread lawlessness and illicit partnerships between private actors and public officials. They’ve been working to cover their tracks since Election Day, but they didn’t work fast enough. Now, the courts need to stop them from destroying any more evidence so that the people of Pennsylvania—and the rest of the country—can accurately assess the ramifications of their wrongdoing.

Explosive new litigation filed in federal district court on Nov. 21 details and documents a wide variety of illegal practices that were used to inflate the number of votes received by Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden, including disparate treatment of voters based on where they live and outright manipulation of Pennsylvania’s voter registration system by partisan activists.

An unprecedented number of mail-in and absentee ballots were cast this year, and practically everyone expected that this would result in a higher-than-usual rate of ballots being rejected for various flaws, such as lacking a secrecy envelope or missing information. In Pennsylvania, tens or hundreds of thousands of ballots were likely to be rejected, based on historical patterns. Instead, a mere 0.03 percent of mail-in ballots were ultimately rejected—somewhere in the neighborhood of about 1,000 votes.

Considering that a significant majority of mail-in votes were cast for Biden, the Democrat candidate benefited handsomely from this discrepancy. But how did this anomaly happen?

It turns out that election officials in Democrat strongholds such as Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), Philadelphia County, and Philadelphia’s collar counties—particularly Delaware County—exceeded their authority in order to give voters preferential treatment that wasn’t afforded to voters in Republican-leaning areas of the state.

Specifically, election workers illegally “pre-canvassed” mail-in ballots to determine whether they were missing a secrecy envelope or failed to include necessary information. When ballots were found to be flawed, voters were given an opportunity to correct, or “cure,” their ballots to make sure they counted. In at least some cases, Democrat Party officials were even given lists of voters to contact about curing their ballots.

Election officials in Republican-leaning counties rightly interpreted this as a violation of Pennsylvania’s election code, but Democrat Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance authorizing the illegal practices despite lacking the statutory authority to do so.

That’s not the only way Democrats broke the law to give their candidate an unfair advantage, though. Extensive on-the-ground investigations conducted over the past year and a half by attorneys and investigators with the Amistad Project of the nonpartisan Thomas More Society have uncovered another element of the plot that involved even more egregious behavior.

Boockvar also exceeded her authority by granting private, partisan organizations—including the notoriously pro-Democrat group “Rock the Vote”—access to the Commonwealth’s Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE).

“Rock the Vote’s web tool was connected to our system, making the process of registering voters through their online programs, and those of their partners, seamless for voters across Pennsylvania,” the lawsuit quotes Boockvar as saying.

That’s not supposed to happen. It’s one thing for outside groups to submit registration applications to the state on behalf of would-be

Newt Gingrich said...

voters, but election clerks are the only ones who are supposed to enter this sort of information directly into the records.

It’s easy to see why by inspecting post-election voter lists, which contain names such as “Mary April Smith,” followed by “Mary May Smith,” “Mary June Smith,” “Mary July Smith,” and so forth through the rest of the calendar. When the same voter lists were purchased just a week later, however, those suspicious names had mysteriously disappeared from the rolls.

Under the circumstances, that’s direct evidence of a systematic effort to conceal wrongdoing. All further alterations to the SURE system should be immediately halted to allow a thorough investigation of the records before any more evidence can be destroyed.

The thieves who attempted to hijack the 2020 presidential election were bound to slip up somewhere, and now they’re trying to clean up the glaring evidence of their wrongdoing before the full extent of their crimes can be exposed to the American public. We can’t allow that to happen, or we may never be able to trust the integrity of our elections again.

anonymous said...


Laziness leads to sloppiness, and sloppiness is how the most brazen heist in American history is being exposed.


WHAT A PILE OF STEAMING HORSESHIT......GOTTA BE FROM FACEBOOK, THE SOURCE OF MORONIC RIGHTIES!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! Not a shred of evidence has come to light to back up these trumpian claims!!!!!

Anonymous said...

"Personal Attack"

Actually , no.

Roger stated his SAT was 97
Roger stated he was a drunkard and now is not.

You don't read Roger's posts here or on his Facebook.

Roger stated he was the cause of both of his failed marriages.
Roger Stated he doesn't do math well.
Roger Stated in 2020 he would live in a luxury home with a super model GF, a huge bank Account and specified he would drive an Audi A8 a 78 k car.


Roger, with one did you never write?

Anonymous said...



"We can’t allow that to happen, or we may never be able to trust the integrity of our elections again."


Too late.


Anonymous said...

Yep, The Democrats pulled off 1960 again.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

So arguments persist to this day about vote-counting in two states, specifically Illinois (where Kennedy won by 9,000 votes) and Texas (where Kennedy won by 46,000 votes). If Nixon had won those two states, he would have defeated Kennedy by two votes in the Electoral College.

That fact wasn’t lost on Nixon’s supporters, who urged the candidate to contest the results. At the time, Kennedy was also leading in the critical state of California, which was Nixon’s home state. But a count of absentee ballots gave Nixon the state several weeks later, after he conceded it to Kennedy.

In Illinois, there were rampant rumors that Chicago’s Mayor Richard Daley used his political machine to stuff the ballot box in Cook County. Democrats charged the GOP with similar tactics in southern Illinois. Down in Texas, there were similar claims about the influence of Kennedy’s running mate, Lyndon B. Johnson, over that state’s election.

On Wednesday afternoon, November 9, 1960, Nixon officially conceded the election to Kennedy. He told his friend, journalist Earl Mazo, that “our country cannot afford the agony of a constitutional crisis.” (Mazo had written a series of articles about voter fraud after the 1960 election, which he stopped at Nixon’s request.)

In later years, Nixon also claimed in an autobiography that widespread fraud happened in Illinois and Texas during the 1960 election.

However, despite Nixon’s requests and decisions to not ask for a recount, the Republican Party had other ideas. In 2000, historian David Greenberg recounted the GOP’s efforts to contest the election in an article for Slate.

Greenberg said it was Mazo who helped to publicize the idea that voter fraud cost Nixon the election, and that Republican officials pursued recounts and investigations in 11 states. In the end, Nixon wound up losing the state of Hawaii to Kennedy after the recounts.

But that doesn’t mean that Daley didn’t affect the outcome in Illinois.

“The GOP's failure to prove fraud doesn't mean, of course, that the election was clean. That question remains unsolved and unsolvable,” Greenberg said.

Another historian, Edmund Kallina, has conducted extensive research into a Chicago vote recount, and he concluded the discrepancies weren’t wide enough to decide the election. In a 2010 interview, Kallina said in the long run, the close election changed politics by forcing parties to focus on the Electoral College, while fueling partisanship at the same time.

Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center.

There is no evidence of fraud this year

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://constitutioncenter.org/amp/blog/the-drama-behind-president-kennedys-1960-election-win

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Biden got 80,000,000+ votes.

A landslide

Anonymous said...



Blogger Roger Amick said...

Biden STOLE 80,000,000+ votes.

evidence of fraud and theft are legion and the cases are just beginning to be heard.

Sidney Powell has just become your worst fucking nightmare.

a judge in PA just halted the certification, and we're just getting started.



Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Biden will be sworn in on January 20th. Get used to it.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Quick Appeal To Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

They will toss it because they have no evidence.

Anonymous said...



Trump is still your President, and Biden IS NOT your President-elect.

GET USED TO THAT, alky.

LOL.

Anonymous said...


Blogger Roger Amick said...
Quick Appeal To Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

They will toss it because they have no evidence.



The audience laughed and gasped in shock as the expert noted a point when a spike of votes recorded in Pennsylvania had 600,000 votes for Biden and only 3,200 for Trump.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/25/highlights-of-pennsylvania-republicans-hearing-on-election-irregularities/


stolen in plain sight alky.

Anonymous said...




Betting markets watched by OddsChecker show the president far ahead of Joe Biden.

“Since 4th November, activity on the market has been steadily increasing and a huge share of those bets have gone in favor of the 45th president to return as the 47th president,” said the analysis from the London-based site.

The latest breakdown shows that 45.8% of all the wagers placed have been on Trump, making him the most popular bet by far. Biden accounts for just 11.13%, and he’s trailing Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, in second at 12.96%.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/2024-trump-already-tops-biden-4-1-in-betting-markets-but-odds-favor-harris

Anonymous said...




Chris Buskirk
@thechrisbuskirk



Pennsylvania Update

700,000 more mail-in/absentee ballots returned and counted than were mailed out?

According to Giuliani the State of Pennsylvania’s website says that they mailed out ~1.8 million ballots but had ~2.5 million returned.

Is this true?

If so, buckle up.



5:56 PM · Nov 25, 2020·Twitter for iPad
10.7K
Retweets
718
Quote Tweets
41.7K
Likes


https://twitter.com/thechrisbuskirk/status/1331733512001519617

Anonymous said...

Smear.

"The Justice Department opened a probe into Georgia Sen. David Perdue's stock sales for possible insider trading earlier this year but declined to pursue charges, according to The New York Times." CNN,,

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

“It’s going to be a very hard thing to concede,” Trump told reporters on Thanksgiving evening as he took questions from the press for the first time since the election following a series of video conferences with military service members.

Pressed further about whether he would concede once the Electoral College finalizes Biden’s win, Trump said, “If they do, they’ve made a mistake.”

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-says-it-will-be-very-hard-thing-concede-biden-n1249114

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

I didn't take anything from Breitbart news robotics bullshit