This is an interesting read... if you understand statistics...

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major “vote spikes” that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these “vote spikes.” Critics point to suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, to cast doubt on the legitimacy of some of these spikes. While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny.

This is one such case: Our analysis finds that a few key vote updates in competitive states were unusually large in size and had an unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratio. We demonstrate the results differ enough from expected results to be cause for concern.

Previously I have discussed statistical anomalies that dealt with odd vote counts in certain counties that appear to show stark difference between the 2016 Trump/Clinton results and the 2020 Trump/Biden results. Generally speaking, these were anomalies due to:

• Much higher margin of Biden to Trump ratio than other counties with the same demographics.
• Much higher margin of Biden to Trump ratio than surrounding counties.
• Much higher Democratic voter turnout than other counties with the same demographics
• Much higher Democratic voter turnout than surrounding counties

These were not smallish anomalies, either. As suggested, single county differences between 2016 and 2020 made up the entire margin of victory for Biden in three different states, while a combination of two different counties made up the difference in two other states. 

This particular article deals with something completely different (but likely related) to these county anomalies. It looks at the so called "vote drops" that take place when a particular county uploads vote totals to the Secretary of State office. What they found was several statistical anomalies that are somewhat close to being unexplainable. 

In some cases, the Biden to Trump ratio did not correlate to any particular county count that you could find and would have required the inclusion of  multiple large Biden counts coming in simultaneously from multiple counties. In some cases the Trump vote was so low, that he barely beat the third party candidate (a result that also cannot be found in any of the actual reported totals anywhere). 

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates. The findings presented by this report [28]suggest that four vote count updates — which collectively were decisive in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and thus decisive of a critical forty-two electoral votes — are especially anomalous and merit further investigation.

Again, this is not unlike what I found when looking at the counties that provided Biden with the margin of victory in several swing states. There doesn't seem to be any correlation to what happened in other parts of the states or in other similar areas. 

Now as pointed out by this article, none of this (on it's own) proves fraud or tampering. It just seems to warrant someone taking the time to make a reasonable explanation for it (assuming that there is a reasonable explanation).

All that being said, there is one thing that these four large drops that feature huge wild anomalies have in common. They all took place in the middle of the night or very early morning, and they all took place in states where the Governors and Secretary of States had claimed that they were done counting.