Wednesday, June 23, 2021

Schumer- The media is biased "for" Trump?

Schumer out of control!
“How despicable a man is Donald Trump?! He lost an election legitimately. He can’t face that, that it was his failure. And he creates a lie, a big lie, and wins so many people over to that lie with the help of news media; and other news commentators that are lying, as well, and they know it.”

Yeah, sure. The media is certainly on the side of Donald Trump here. Obviously there is nobody in the media willing to repeat the Schumer Democrat rhetoric that election fraud is the "big lie". Well nobody except for CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, and every other liberal outlet there is. 

I  want to try to understand why these people are so upset that everyone just doesn't suck it up and accept their explanation that 2020 was the "most secure election ever". Obviously it was not the "most secure election ever". Nearly ever state with a Democratic Governor loosened their security measures, we had more people arrested for fraud or fraud attempts than in any recent election, mostly involving mail in ballots. We have numerous examples of chain of custody issues. Statistical anomalies abound unexplained. 

Moreover, the counties under scrutiny are fighting like cornered badgers to keep anyone from actually auditing or looking at their ballots. Doesn't seem very secure to me. 

Now does that mean that Donald Trump won the election and was "robbed" by cheaters? Not necessarily. But without actually investigating anything it's sort of impossible to either claim it was legitimate or it was not. 

So perhaps Chuck should put together a real Senate investigation of the 2020 election. Take every allegation and go through them with a fine tooth comb, allowing for bi-partisan independent review by people who are not the same ones who secured and counted the ballots in the first place. After all, it is not an audit to audit yourself. Then, if everything proves to be on the up and up, they can put it to rest. 

34 comments:

Commander-in-Thief Biden said...


One state, I think it was Wisconsin, had over a thousand people made notarized statements that there was election fraud they personally witnessed.

This was a joke election

Wait till we see the results of the Arizona forensic audit. I'm especially eager to see the results of the sharpie ballots and how they were adjudicated.

If Arizona flips...

rrb said...



Their panic is palpable and their attitude is telling.

They KNOW they stole the fucker. They KNOW the fraud they orchestrated and perpetuated. They simply couldn't help themselves.

The left became so consumed with TDS they shut down a $23 TRILLION economy to destroy the bad orange man.

Liberalism is mental illness straight up. And Schumer is today's poster boy for the insanity.


JamesNewLeaf's Fucking Daddy said...

Zoe Tillman
https://twitter.com/ZoeTillman/status/1407693199062228999

New: We have the first plea deal in the Jan. 6 Oath Keepers conspiracy case – Graydon Young will be appearing this afternoon in court, more to come


Steve Cortes
https://twitter.com/CortesSteve/status/1407700170029010947

First Jan 6th sentencing today. She’ll plead guilty to “parading” in the Capitol.

Look at these “insurrectionists”!



another joke


JamesNewLeaf's Fucking Daddy said...

oops, sorry wrong thread...

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

HATE TO TELL YOU GUYS, BUT----
GOP Investigation Finds No Vote Fraud In Michigan<
REPEAT:
THAT WAS A GOP GOP GOP GOP INVESTIGATION.

June 23, 2021 at 9:50 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 77 Comments

A months-long Republican investigation into Michigan’s 2020 election uncovered no evidence of widespread fraud and concluded Wednesday with a recommendation the attorney general investigate those who made false claims for “personal gain,” Bridge Michigan reports.

From the report:
“Our clear finding is that citizens should be confident the results represent the true results of the ballots cast by the people of Michigan.

"The committee strongly recommends citizens use a critical eye and ear toward those who have pushed demonstrably false theories for their own personal gain.”

rrb said...




It's not about preventing the denial of voting rights or expanding voting rights to the disenfranchised or any of that crap. Raving commie Jew-hating stooge, token "Squad" male and profoundly dim-bulb Jamaal Bowman openly defines what this is to the airport waiting area masses:

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-New York) appeared on CNN Tuesday and admitted that the Democrats' federal election bill is all about Democrats staying in power.
That's it. That's the post.

Democrat Jamaal Bowman admits S.1 legislation is a power grab. "If we deliver [S.1], we maintain power in 2022. If we don't...we risk losing power."



. . . The Democrats are acting like a questionable win at the presidential level in the midst of a historic pandemic, losing seats in the House, narrowly capturing the Senate in questionable special elections, and losing big at the state level, all constitute a mandate for them to obtain total power forever and to push a hard-left agenda that the American people don't support.



http://ace.mu.nu/archives/394414.php


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The first amendment was strengthened today


WASHINGTON — The nation's public schools cannot punish students for what they say off campus unless their expression amounts to bullying or a threat, the Supreme Court said Wednesday.

The ruling broadened First Amendment protections in an era when school children are in nearly constant contact with each other through social media and text messages. But it in a disappointment to civil liberties advocates, the decision did not protect all off-campus expression.

It was nonetheless a victory for Brandi Levy, who was a ninth grader at a Pennsylvania high school when she was punished for a message she posted to Snapchat one Saturday at a convenience store, after discovering that she didn't make the varsity cheerleading team and would remain on the junior varsity squad.

She used a vulgar four-letter verb to write, "f--- school f--- softball f--- cheer f--- everything." When the message was discovered by one of the school's cheerleading coaches, Brandi was suspended from the junior varsity team for her entire sophomore year.

JamesNewLeaf's Fucking Daddy said...


Well I guess now it's the right thread

ROFLMFAO !!!


Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

AND SCOTTIE KEEPS RIGHT ON SLURPING THE TRUMP KOOL-AID.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

It is NOT questionable for a political party to want to hold on to power by allowing people to vote.

It IS questionable for a political party to want to hold on to power by preventing people from voting.

Ultimately, it is WE THE PEOPLE who should have the power to decide.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Republican election officials in Georgia and Nevada who have stood up for the integrity of the 2020 election results have been denounced by fellow Republicans. Republican lawmakers across the US have made pilgrimages to visit and champion an unprecedented inquiry into ballots in Arizona, which experts see as a thinly veiled effort to undermine confidence in the election. One hundred and forty-seven Republicans in the US House voted to overturn the results of the November election absent any evidence of voter fraud and after government officials said the 2020 election was the “most secure in American history”.

“Voter suppression is not new, the battle lines have been drawn over that for quite some time. But this new concern about election subversion is really worrisome,” said Richard Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, who studies election rules.

The willingness to deny election results comes amid heightened concern that Republicans are maneuvering to take over offices that would empower them to block the winners of elections from being seated. Several Republicans who have embraced the idea that the election was stolen are running to serve as secretaries of state, the chief election official in many places, a perch from which they would exert enormous power over elections, including the power to hold up certifying races.

 We’ve had disputed elections in the past, but we’ve never had the denial of the basic mathematical reality of counting votes. Scott uses spreadsheets every day, but he declines to believe the results.

“I do think it’s a relatively new phenomenon, unfortunately, and disturbing,” said Edward Foley, a law professor at the Ohio State University who has written extensively about the history of contested elections in the US. “We’ve had disputed elections in the past, but we’ve never had the denial of the basic mathematical reality of counting votes.”


Republicans in every state that you keep saying that they were hidden by the evil media companies. Except fox, and even then when one of their reporters said that the President has lost the election, he has chosen to believe the big lie!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/13/republicans-big-lie-us-election-trump

Myballs said...

Dems are working so hard to oppose fair and secure elections. Why? 82% of the country supports ID to vote.

rrb said...



80% of American supports Voter ID.

The left vehemently and violently oppose Voter ID.

The left seeks to codify Voter FRAUD into law.

Why does the left require the ability to cheat and steal in order to get elected and get their legislation passed?

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

If the Republicans keep tying to suppress the people who have voted Democratic for their lives from voting, they will be the first existential threat to the people of the United States in history.

There are a few right wing terrorists who are advocating a three nation solution.

From Idaho and North Dakota to Texas, excluding Colorado and New Mexico.

The east and west states have the majority of American citizens. I known people who despise the east and west coast states, because they outnumber them and want to make them more diverse, they would like to be able to discriminate minority people from moving into their states.



rrb said...




Democrats did not win the last Senate elections. Republicans did. They did not win by as wide a margin as they needed to maintain control of the Senate, but the American people backed them, not Democrats.

And Democrats cannot handle that. They pretend that they received a landslide last November and January, when they actually lost. By believing their own Fake News, Democrats set themselves not only to fail but to fail spectacularly.

Republicans won 20 of the 35 senate races last year. Republicans received 49% of the vote, Democrats 47%.

This split the Senate 50-50. As president of the Senate, Vice President Kamala Harris decides any tie vote.

But Democrats want to pretend that they have this mandate from the people, which they do not have.

The echo chamber of the Washington media unthinkingly repeats their talking points. So reliably on message are ABC-CBS-CNN-NBC-MSNBC-AP that I truly believe their anchors are trans-species parrots. After decades of misleading the public, most people no longer follow them down the dark alleys of politics, where liberals mug them.

For example, since January the media have called Republican efforts to reform state voting laws Jim Crow. The media portrays Democrats as champions of voting rights, when in fact Democrats want to void state laws and have Washington run state and local elections.

The things Democrats want, voters do not want.

CNS News reported on its recent poll. It said, “Fully 78% of U.S. voters say asking voters to present a photo as proof of identity is an appropriate method of ensuring election integrity – more than four times the 17.2% who say it’s an unreasonable form of voter suppression. Another 4.8% say they ‘don’t know.'”



https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2021/06/manchin-is-not-problem-democrats-are.html

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The vast majority of Democrats support voter identification.


The gimmick is the Republicans put restrictions on what kind of id is acceptable.

If you have a certificate to carry a weapon is acceptable . But a college student id is unacceptable to vote.

There could be an acceptable compromise but the Republicans have filibustered any compromise, because all they want is power.

They don't have an agenda, except hate and anger. And of course conspiracy theories since day one of January 20th in 2017.

And even before, with the birther theory bullshit. It was the reason he was nominated in the first place.

rrb said...




According to RedState who originally broke the news:

RedState has exclusively reported since June 4 that a high-ranking member of the Chinese government we now know to be Dong Jingwei, the country’s top counterintelligence official, defected to the United States. Multiple sources within the US intelligence community who receive briefings on the matter told RedState details about Dong’s defection (as reported here) and that officials at the Defense Intelligence Agency have high confidence in the information Dong has provided, including information showing that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is in fact a military bioweapons research lab completely controlled by the People’s Liberation Army and that the virus we now know as SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in the Wuhan lab. Information from that defector was used by an expert virologist and a scientist formerly with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in conjunction with previously available public information about the virus’s genome, to independently determine that the virus was engineered.

General McInerney, who served as the number three guy in the Pentagon, has spoken to contacts about this incident and understands why Dong chose to go to the DIA instead of other agencies that normally work with defectors.

“The CIA and the FBI, the Department of Justice and other organizations are dirty,” he said. “And we have Deep Staters there that have their interest, not the nation’s interests.”



https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2021/06/gen-tom-mcinerney-heres-why-the-chinese-top-intel-head-defected-to-the-dia-not-the-cia-or-fbi

rrb said...



Codifying Voter Fraud and Election Theft into law...

Not quite.

LOL.

The details of the Democrat inspired legislation are as follows:

Federalize control over congressional elections;

Declare that standard state and local maintenance of elections systems, such as purging ineligible voters from voter rolls, limiting vote-by-mail, requiring voter ID, and establishing rules against felons voting, would erode the right to vote;

Restrict lawsuits against the rules in S. 1 to the federal court system, which is, coincidentally, favorable to Democrats;

Establish online and automatic voter registration;

Protect illegal immigrants from prosecution if they vote;

Establish same-day voter registration;

Register minors to vote;

Mandate early voting;

Establish nationwide vote-by-mail without a voter ID; and

Allow ballots to be counted ten days after Election Day.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/22/democrats-establishment-media-crushed-by-senate-republicans-blocking-elections-takeover-bill/


This is the complete fucking criminal garbage the US has just avoided.




C.H. Truth said...

The gimmick is the Republicans put restrictions on what kind of id is acceptable.

What Kind of ID should be acceptable?

How about the same sort of ID that would be acceptable for getting on a plane or buying a case of beer? It's a pretty simple concept.

rrb said...



How about the same sort of ID that would be acceptable for getting on a plane or buying a case of beer? It's a pretty simple concept.


Oh no.

The ID needs to be "special." As in not RAY-CISS. But we're not allowed to know what that means because to ask would be RAY-CISS.

See how this works?

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

This bill is dead because the former President Trump has spread the big lie about a steal.

Washington, D.C. –  Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) today spoke on the Senate floor after Republicans blocked debate on key voting rights legislation. Below are Senator Schumer’s remarks, which can also be viewed here:

I want to be clear about what just happened on the Senate floor.

Every single Senate Republican just voted against starting debate—starting debate—on legislation to protect Americans’ voting rights.

Once again, the Senate Republican minority has launched a partisan blockade of a pressing issue here in the United States Senate, an issue no less fundamental than the right to vote.

I have laid out the facts for weeks. Republican state legislatures across the country are engaged in the most sweeping voter suppression in 80 years. Capitalizing on, and catalyzed by, Donald Trump’s Big Lie, these state governments are making it harder for younger, poorer, urban, and non-White Americans to vote.

Earlier today, the Republican Leader told reporters that “regardless of what may be happening in some states, there’s no rationale for federal intervention.” The Republican leader flatly stated that no matter what the states do to undermine our democracy—voter suppression laws, phony “audits,” or partisan takeovers of local election boards—the Senate should not act.

My colleagues, my colleagues. If Senators sixty years ago held that the federal government should never intervene to protect voting rights, this body would have never passed the Voting Rights Act.

The Republican leader uses the language and the logic of the Southern Senators of the 1960’s who defended states’ rights, and it is an indefensible position for any Senator—any Senator, let alone the Minority Leader—to hold. And yet, that was the reason given for why Republicans voted in lockstep today: “regardless of what may be happening in some states, there’s no rationale for federal intervention.”

That is both ridiculous and awful.

All we wanted to do here on the floor was to bring up the issue of voting rights and debate how to combat these vicious, oftentimes discriminatory voting restrictions. And today, every single Democratic Senator stood together in the fight to protect the right to vote in America. The Democratic Party in the Senate will always stand united to defend our democracy. I spoke with President Biden earlier this afternoon as well. He has been unshakable in his support of S.1 and I want to thank the President and the Vice President for their efforts.

But regrettably, regrettably, our efforts were met by the unanimous opposition of the Senate minority. Once again, Senate Republicans have signed their names in the ledger of History alongside Donald Trump, the Big Lie, and voter suppression—to their enduring disgrace. This vote—I’m ashamed to say—is further evidence that voter suppression has become part of the official platform of the Republican Party.

Now, Republican Senators may have prevented us from having a debate on voting rights today. But I want to be very clear about one thing: the fight to protect voting rights is not over. By no means. In the fight for voting rights, this vote was the starting gun, not the finish line.

Let me say that again: in the fight for voting rights, this vote was the starting gun, not the finish line.

Imo, the infrastructure bill will get approved by the reconciliation system.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

If the economy continues to grow quit quickly, enough people will not vote against the Democrats, in a reversal of the historical outcome for 90 years.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Buying a beer or fly on an airplane, is not the same thing as the right to vote.

A reasonable solution could happen, but the Republicans have only one agenda is power.

The same thing happened during the first term of President Obama, Mitch McConnell said he wanted to make sure that Obama didn't win a second term.

I know it's repetitive but the Republican don't have an agenda, except power.

rrb said...

Blogger Roger Amick said...

Buying a beer or fly on an airplane, is not the same thing as the right to vote.



So enlighten us. From the perspective of requiring ID, what's the difference?




rrb said...

Blogger Roger Amick said...

If the economy continues to grow quit quickly, enough people will not vote against the Democrats, in a reversal of the historical outcome for 90 years.



So alky...

Can I take this to the bank like "KERRY BY A LANDSLIDE"???

LOL.

you do realize that you're batting exactly 00.00% with regards to political predictions, right?

Caliphate4vr said...

Yeah Manchin says ID can be a freaking utility bill

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

I got your talking points in my email today.

Patriot,

Have you noticed that the Radical Left is now admitting
I was right about everything they LIED about before the Election?Hydroxychloroquine works.
The China Virus came from a Chinese lab.
Hunter Biden's laptop was real
Lafayette Square was not cleared for a photo op.
The Russian Bounties story was fake.
We did produce vaccines before the end of 2020, in record time I might add.
Blue state lockdowns didn't work.
Schools should be opened.
Critical Race Theory is a disaster for our schools and our Country.
Our Southern Border security program was unprecedentedly successful.
The media and their Democrat partners spent YEARS lying about me to the American People and it turns out I was RIGHT all along. 

I've received NO apologies, NO retractions, nothing.

rrb said...


Blogger Caliphate4vr said...

Yeah Manchin says ID can be a freaking utility bill



Not good enough.

The left is demanding an old pizza delivery receipt be accepted as ID.

Anything more stringent than that is RAY-CISS.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Biden FOX News 56 | YouGov 52 | Rasmussen 52 | RCP Avg. 53.0

Foxnews is a RINO according to the troll squad assholes

Donald J. Trump said...

“After months of ignoring the crisis at the Southern Border, it is great that we got Kamala Harris to finally go and see the tremendous destruction and death that they’ve created—a direct result of Biden ending my very tough but fair Border policies,” Trump said in a statement. “Harris and Biden were given the strongest Border in American history. And now, it is by far the worst in American history.”

“If Governor Abbott and I weren’t going there next week, she would have never gone!” 

August will live in history after the big steal is finally disclosed and America will return to normality.



Anonymous said...

Huh.

Some righties are mad at him this afternoon for opining on the topic, which is beyond his purview of national defense, but Gaetz brought it up. So did Rep. Mike Waltz, a veteran himself, who claimed back in April that cadets at West Point had been given a lecture =entitled “Understanding Whiteness and White Rage.” That explains Milley’s use of the term in the clip, I take it — Waltz had mentioned it during questioning and so Milley was addressing his point.

But it sure is interesting that Milley would tie “white rage” to the January 6 insurrection, which I assume Waltz didn’t do. “This general thinks that studying CRT will help him understand 1/6. That’s a revealing remark,” tweeted Andrew Sullivan. It is.

It’s also revealing how Milley pivots from CRT to a brief tour through American history, from slavery to the Civil War to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “What is wrong with understanding, having some situational understanding about the country for which we are here to defend?” he asks. A core point made by opponents of Critical Race Theory, though, is that it’s not essential to understanding U.S. history. If anything, it distorts history by reducing it to a series of power struggles between racial blocs. You can teach slavery and the civil-rights movement, they insist, without bundling CRT’s dogma about “whiteness” and structural racism into it.

The upshot of Milley’s answer is that, well, maybe you can’t. Not to adults, anyway. If you want to understand an important perspective on American history maybe you should read CRT, even if you end up agreeing with it no more than you agree with Marx. Which is fine, but as Ben Shapiro says, Marx isn’t on the military’s recommended reading list. (I think.) Kendi is. How come?


Marxism?


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

I would now like to introduce President Biden, who has emphasized the importance of this issue and who has my gratitude for gathering us together today.
 
Thank you.
 
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Roger. Let me — before I begin, thank the participants in our roundtable today: two mayors — three mayors, chiefs of police, attorneys general, and community organizers who have been doing significant work in bringing down violent crime in their communities. There is no one — one answer that fits everything. And it’s about being engaged and multiple organizations being engaged.
 
So, I want to thank you for the time you spent with us today. And I warned you: I’m coming back at you again for more information. (Laughter.)
 
And we just met, as a I said, with a bipartisan group of mayors, law enforcement, and community leaders. And we discussed a comprehensive strategy that I’m releasing today to combat the epidemic of gun violence and other violent crime that we’ve been seeing in our country for far too long, that has spiked since the start of the pandemic over a year ago.
 
Crime has — historically rises during the summer. And as we emerge from this pandemic with the country opening back up again, the traditional summer’s — summer spike may even be more pronounced than it usually would be.
 
For folks at home, here’s what you need to know: I’ve been at this a long time and there are things we know that work that reduce gun violence and violent crime, and things that we don’t know about. But things we know about: Background checks for purchasing a firearm are important; a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines — no one needs to have a weapon that can fire over 30, 40, 50, even up to 100 rounds unless you think the deer are wearing Kevlar vests or something; community policing and programs that keep neighborhoods safe and keep folks out of trouble.
 
These efforts worked. They saved lives. But over time, these policies were gutted and were woefully underfunded.
 
In our conversation today, we talked about our strategy to supercharge what works while we continue to push the Congress to act on sensible gun violence legislation.
 
First, we discussed cracking down, as you heard from the Attorney General, on rogue gun dealers. We know that if there is a strict enforcement of background checks, then fewer guns get into the hands of criminals. Background checks have thus far kept more than 3 million guns out of the hands of felons — convicted felons, fugitives, domestic abusers, and others prohibited from being able to purchase a gun. And there are still too many loopholes in that system.
 
And, today, enough rogue gun dealers feel like they can get away with selling guns to people who aren’t legally allowed to own them.
 
And I might add: The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a cannon.
 

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Those who say the blood of lib- — “the blood of patriots,” you know, and all the stuff about how we’re going to have to move against the government. Well, the tree of liberty is not watered with the blood of patriots. What’s happened is that there have never been — if you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.
 
The point is that there has always been the ability to limit — rationally limit the type of weapon that can be owned and who can own it.
 
The last time we had data on this issue of who is purchasing guns was more than 20 years ago. Five percent of gun dealers — it turns out, in the study we did — showed that 90 percent of illegal guns were found at the crime scenes sold by 5 percent of gun dealers. Five percent sold 90 percent of the guns found at crime scenes.
 
And the — these merchants of death are breaking the law for profit. They’re selling guns that are killing innocent people. It’s wrong. It’s unacceptable. And as the Attorney General said, we’re going to crack down on those gun dealers and the violent criminals they knowingly arm.
 
In April, I announced that the Justice Department is going to be issuing an annual report on gun trafficking so we can update that data.
 
Today, the Department is announcing, as I just did, a major crackdown on — to stem the flow of guns used to commit violent crimes. It’s zero tolerance for gun dealers who willfully violate key existing laws and regulations. Let me repeat: zero tolerance.
 
If you willfully sell a gun to someone who is prohibited from possessing it, if you willfully fail to run a background check, if you willfully falsify a record, if you willfully fail to cooperate with the tracing requests or inspections, my message to you is this: We’ll find you, and we will seek your license to sell guns. We’ll make sure you can’t sell death and mayhem on our streets. It’s an outrage. It has to end, and we’ll end it. Period.
 
Second, we discussed disrupting illegal gun trafficking. Now, the gun lobby wants you to believe that cities that are the toughest gun — have the toughest gun laws still have the highest rates of gun violence, as was pointed out by the group we had today in our roundtable. They — the violence is so — they argue, “Why do you need those gun laws if they don’t work in cities that have tough laws?” Don’t believe it.