Multiple sources -- chiefly the U.S government by its efforts to hide him -- identify Capitol Police Lieutenant Michael L. Byrd as the officer who killed Ashli Babbitt as she was attempting to climb through a window to enter the House Speaker's lobby that day. Were this identification incorrect, the certainty that the correct one is surfacing in secretless D.C. reminds our oligarchy of how hazardous are the foundations on which it set the ruling narrative that it narrowly thwarted the supposed "greatest menace to our democracy since the Civil War" -- armed, white insurrectionists in the act of overthrowing the U.S. government, by courageous police work and prosecutions.
From Joe Biden to the lowest ranks of the Justice Department and the media, the oligarchy had bet, in the name of national security, it could stonewall for the long run about who exactly did what on January 6. A forlorn bet, especially since the narrative on which the oligarchy rests its right to intimidate its opponents depends so much on affirming the virtuosity of its acts of oppression -- foremost of which was shooting and killing Babbitt. But if the killing was a salvific act, why hide the killer? Why not celebrate him?
Most forthrightly Biden could award Lt. Byrd (or someone else) the Congressional Medal of Honor in a solemn Oval Office ceremony and read the citation to the American people. . .
. . . Medal of Honor citations, however, consist of detailed descriptions of the act being celebrated. They detail the enemy, the circumstances, and the danger that the awardee took upon himself to save others. They explain to Americans as well as to the awardee why all of us should ever be proud of him.
Hence, detail and transparency are essential to the ceremony. Who was the enemy on January 6? Who were the white supremacists, and who organized them? The U.S government has spent countless millions developing databases on white supremacists, whom it officially considers the principal threat to the American people's security. Surely, it can publish the list it has compiled that shows who endangered what. And if it refuses to do so because those on that list might sue for slander, perhaps that list is not one of facts but of political innuendo. . .
. . . Because the government had such a hand -- big and unpalatable to Americans -- in the events of January 6, it is now impossible for the U.S. government to detail factually who "the enemy" was on January 6 without indicting itself.
That is why the Biden [junta's] Justice Department is holding, without bail in solitary confinement, persons whom it unofficially accuses of "insurrection" but, officially, for the most part, can prove only that they trespassed and interfered with official proceedings. . .
. . . More important, the effective admission that none of January 6's demonstrators willfully injured anyone, and that the only willful injurer was a government agent, enlivens the question of what all the other government agents involved in that day's events were doing. Not only the ones who were trying to manipulate organizations that exist largely because of government infiltrators, but also the Capitol Police who physically attacked and egged on peaceful demonstrators. There is a lot of video on that.
Once the government admits that its most obvious January 6 actor is not worthy of a Medal of Honor, and that it has been covering up something indefensible, by what credible argument can it refuse to release videos of events -- and to provide witnesses under oath -- about who ordered whom to do what on January 6?
BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) - A veteran FBI Special Agent appeared in Ascension parish for a bond hearing in that parish Thursday morning.
District Judge Tess Stromberg ordered David Harris, 51, of Prairieville, held without bond.
A source familiar with the case said the allegations against Harris are extremely disturbing.
Prosecutors did not reveal specific allegations against Harris during the hearing, only saying that the allegations involve underage girls including one of the agent’s relatives.
Prosecutors said he threatened at least one of the young victims if she said anything.
It was revealed during the same hearing Thursday that Harris is also accused of “indecency with a child” in the Tyler, Texas area.
Harris, who was arrested last week, is accused of multiple sex crimes across several jurisdictions, including rape and offenses involving children.
Harris, who is assigned to the New Orleans FBI field office, was most recently appointed to head up a regional division of the FBI that investigates online crimes against children, including child pornography.
The investigation currently involves allegations from as far back as 2016, but could eventually stretch back much further to a time when the agent was in the United States military, sources said.
In Ascension Parish, the agent is charged with aggravated crimes against nature and indecent behavior with children under the age of 13, records show.
Authorities in both East Baton Rouge and Orleans parish say they plan to charge him with alleged crimes in those two parishes.
In East Baton Rouge Parish, he is set to be charged with aggravated crimes against nature, indecent behavior with juveniles, obscenity, and witness intimidation. In Orleans Parish, he faces charges of sexual battery and attempted third-degree rape.
The alleged victims include both adults and juveniles, authorities said.
Funny Lil Schitty.....way back when you were in the real minority.....a single R vote on anything was declared by you and others to be bi partisan.....My how your mind has failed.....BWAAAAAAA!!!!
7 comments:
Multiple sources -- chiefly the U.S government by its efforts to hide him -- identify Capitol Police Lieutenant Michael L. Byrd as the officer who killed Ashli Babbitt as she was attempting to climb through a window to enter the House Speaker's lobby that day. Were this identification incorrect, the certainty that the correct one is surfacing in secretless D.C. reminds our oligarchy of how hazardous are the foundations on which it set the ruling narrative that it narrowly thwarted the supposed "greatest menace to our democracy since the Civil War" -- armed, white insurrectionists in the act of overthrowing the U.S. government, by courageous police work and prosecutions.
From Joe Biden to the lowest ranks of the Justice Department and the media, the oligarchy had bet, in the name of national security, it could stonewall for the long run about who exactly did what on January 6. A forlorn bet, especially since the narrative on which the oligarchy rests its right to intimidate its opponents depends so much on affirming the virtuosity of its acts of oppression -- foremost of which was shooting and killing Babbitt. But if the killing was a salvific act, why hide the killer? Why not celebrate him?
Most forthrightly Biden could award Lt. Byrd (or someone else) the Congressional Medal of Honor in a solemn Oval Office ceremony and read the citation to the American people. . .
. . . Medal of Honor citations, however, consist of detailed descriptions of the act being celebrated. They detail the enemy, the circumstances, and the danger that the awardee took upon himself to save others. They explain to Americans as well as to the awardee why all of us should ever be proud of him.
Hence, detail and transparency are essential to the ceremony. Who was the enemy on January 6? Who were the white supremacists, and who organized them? The U.S government has spent countless millions developing databases on white supremacists, whom it officially considers the principal threat to the American people's security. Surely, it can publish the list it has compiled that shows who endangered what. And if it refuses to do so because those on that list might sue for slander, perhaps that list is not one of facts but of political innuendo. . .
. . . Because the government had such a hand -- big and unpalatable to Americans -- in the events of January 6, it is now impossible for the U.S. government to detail factually who "the enemy" was on January 6 without indicting itself.
That is why the Biden [junta's] Justice Department is holding, without bail in solitary confinement, persons whom it unofficially accuses of "insurrection" but, officially, for the most part, can prove only that they trespassed and interfered with official proceedings. . .
. . . More important, the effective admission that none of January 6's demonstrators willfully injured anyone, and that the only willful injurer was a government agent, enlivens the question of what all the other government agents involved in that day's events were doing. Not only the ones who were trying to manipulate organizations that exist largely because of government infiltrators, but also the Capitol Police who physically attacked and egged on peaceful demonstrators. There is a lot of video on that.
Once the government admits that its most obvious January 6 actor is not worthy of a Medal of Honor, and that it has been covering up something indefensible, by what credible argument can it refuse to release videos of events -- and to provide witnesses under oath -- about who ordered whom to do what on January 6?
https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/22/why-not-award-ashli-babbitts-killer-the-medal-of-honor/
BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) - A veteran FBI Special Agent appeared in Ascension parish for a bond hearing in that parish Thursday morning.
District Judge Tess Stromberg ordered David Harris, 51, of Prairieville, held without bond.
A source familiar with the case said the allegations against Harris are extremely disturbing.
Prosecutors did not reveal specific allegations against Harris during the hearing, only saying that the allegations involve underage girls including one of the agent’s relatives.
Prosecutors said he threatened at least one of the young victims if she said anything.
It was revealed during the same hearing Thursday that Harris is also accused of “indecency with a child” in the Tyler, Texas area.
Harris, who was arrested last week, is accused of multiple sex crimes across several jurisdictions, including rape and offenses involving children.
Harris, who is assigned to the New Orleans FBI field office, was most recently appointed to head up a regional division of the FBI that investigates online crimes against children, including child pornography.
The investigation currently involves allegations from as far back as 2016, but could eventually stretch back much further to a time when the agent was in the United States military, sources said.
In Ascension Parish, the agent is charged with aggravated crimes against nature and indecent behavior with children under the age of 13, records show.
Authorities in both East Baton Rouge and Orleans parish say they plan to charge him with alleged crimes in those two parishes.
In East Baton Rouge Parish, he is set to be charged with aggravated crimes against nature, indecent behavior with juveniles, obscenity, and witness intimidation. In Orleans Parish, he faces charges of sexual battery and attempted third-degree rape.
The alleged victims include both adults and juveniles, authorities said.
https://www.wafb.com/2021/07/01/fbi-agent-appears-gonzales-courtroom-sex-charges/
I heard Nancy was also going to add Kinzinger.
What a pair
Looking forward to the Republicans setting up their own investigation. There are real obvious questions that the MSM and Democrats have hid.
So far successfully.
But daylight will sure help.
Funny Lil Schitty.....way back when you were in the real minority.....a single R vote on anything was declared by you and others to be bi partisan.....My how your mind has failed.....BWAAAAAAA!!!!
Bi-partisan or not, the commission will go looking for the truth.
That's going to HURT you extremists.
The stinking Trump albatross around the GOP's neck just keeps getting stinkier.
partisan or not, the commission will go looking for the truth.
Wherever it is. It won't be the truth. Because the truth will damn the Democrats.
Post a Comment