Saturday, October 30, 2021

A legitimate ISIS threat. When was the last time we heard this?

The fact that ISIS is in any position to pose a threat is because of Biden

So not only is this a problem nationally, but it comes at a bad time for Terry McAuliffe in Virgina. The last minute idea that ISIS is now a threat for the Virginia area has got to work against Biden and ultimately McAuliffe. In fact, if you were to come up with an 11th hour surprise that helped Youngkin, a terrorist threat that can be put back on Biden and his Afghanistan fiasco might have beem what you would have drawn up.

Bad news for Biden. Bad news for McAuliffe. Bad news for Virginia. Bad news for America.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, not During the Successful Trump year.

We did a lot during the Lost Years Pres and now during Lost Years Pres 2.0.

The Real Coldheartedtruth said...

The Coldheartedtruth is that no matter what President had withdraw from Afghanistan, the same thing as in 2001 as the terrorist al Qaeda leader.

But we already know about the dangers and modern technology weapons can destroy the terrorists without us troops are at risk.

George Bush was the President on 9 11

Soars Yahoo was because we united with the President

C.H. Truth said...

Hey Roger!

George W Bush didn't allow 45,000 unvetted people in from a terror state... only to see a few weeks later that we now have embedded ISIS in our country posting a very real terror threat.

There is a difference between being President when an unknown and unsuspected terror attack took place... and being President and MAKING THE DECISION TO ALLOW 45,000 UNVETTED PEOPLE FROM A TERROR STATE INTO OUR COUNTRY.


How can you possibly support that move, Roger?

45,000 unvetted people FROM A TERROR STATE.

You look like a fucking idiot trying to compare apples to oranges.

rrb said...

Anonymous The Real Coldheartedtruth said...

The Coldheartedtruth is that no matter what President had withdraw from Afghanistan, the same thing as in 2001 as the terrorist al Qaeda leader.



LMAO @ the alky's latest gibberish word salad.

Go outside and get some fresh air you fucking simpleton. Have the orderly put you in a harness like a small child.


Anonymous said...

It is what he excels at.

"You (roger) look like a fucking idiot trying to compare apples to oranges."

Anonymous said...

Roger, Jump in your Audi A8 and go for a drive.

Start living .

C.H. Truth said...

Rat...

There is absolutely no circumstances where Trump would have flown in a single unvetted Afghani into the United States, much less 45,000 of them.

But this is the degree of idiocy that we get from liberals these days. They cannot defend Biden's actions, other than to suggest that every other President we have had would have been just as incompetent and stupid.

Lower expectations isn't just for Biden.

We are supposed accept that everyone and everything is as dumb as Biden as to not offend those who voted for him. I mean nobody is smart enough to know that if you bring in 45,000 people from a literal terrorist state without vetting any of them... that some of them might be part of that terror state?

rrb said...

We are supposed accept that everyone and everything is as dumb as Biden as to not offend those who voted for him. I mean nobody is smart enough to know that if you bring in 45,000 people from a literal terrorist state without vetting any of them... that some of them might be part of that terror state?


Absolutely and without question.

So I ask again -

If a group of individuals sought to destroy the United States of America, what if anything would they be doing differently right now from what these pack of raging Marxist assholes is currently doing?

Intentionally importing 45,000 terrorists.

And then contemplating paying them $450,000.00 each.

The Real Coldheartedtruth said...

You believe one Republican congresswoman has access to the information and nothing else to back it up.

Brainwashed schizophrenia squad

The Real Coldheartedtruth said...

Sleepy Joe Biden is going to get it done next week.


House Democratic leaders are telling lawmakers they plan to pass both a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and a $1.75 trillion social spending bill as early as Tuesday, two sources familiar with the conversations tell Axios.

Why it matters: It’s a very ambitious timeline, but leadership is eager to deliver a win to President Biden while he meets with world leaders in Europe.

This would mark dramatic progress since the president left the country on Thursday with only a deal on a framework for his massive social spending bill, but no votes.

What we’re hearing: House leadership told the committees they have until Sunday to finish making changes to the Build Back Better bill, a leadership aide tells Axios.

Then the House Rules Committee would meet as soon as Monday to mark up the package, and a floor vote would happen as soon as Tuesday.The aide emphasized the schedule is “not set in stone yet.”

Between the lines: If Democrats succeed, the votes would coincide with a gubernatorial election in Virginia that politicians view as a referendum on Biden’s first year in office.

Though Virginia has trended Democratic in recent cycles and went for Biden by 10 points in 2020, former Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe is locked in a dead heat with Republican Glenn Youngkin.Biden himself pled with House Democrats during a caucus meeting on Thursday that the fate of the two packages will be key to the electoral success of his administration and congressional Democrats.

What's next: House progressives, some of whom have withheld support for the infrastructure bill until they have been assured the Senate will pass the social spending measure, are meeting virtually on Sunday afternoon, two Democratic aides tell Axios.

The meeting is being billed to members as "an important update on the [Build Back Better Act]."Progressives appear supportive of leadership's plan to advance both bills quickly this week, but the meeting aims to solidify a position for the caucus as a whole, according to one of the aides.

If they pass it before the polls close, just enough people will get excited to vote for the Democratic nominee in Virginia





rrb said...


You believe one Republican congresswoman has access to the information and nothing else to back it up.

Who? Liz Cheney?

Her tradecraft is lies alky. Lies for political advantage and to curry favor with Nancy Peloshee. Her claims are baseless and without merit. There's zero fucking evidence to substantiate any claims she makes about Jan. 6.

So I'm not exactly sure what the fuck you're even talking about. And I suppose that makes two of us since you don't either.

"Insurrection." LMAO.

Nothing but a false flag op staged by the FBI with an assist from antifa.

There's your fucking "insurrection" alky.

Idiot.








The Real Coldheartedtruth said...

In the story about it said the threat came from outside of the United States.


It didn't mention the 45,000 people who supported our forces for 20 years.

As usual the Republicans made up the allegations in order to help Republicans in Virginia Virginia Virginia.

C.H. Truth said...

It didn't mention the 45,000 people who supported our forces for 20 years.

The vast majority of the 45,000 people were completely unvetted.

You have absolutely no clue if any of them were people who supported our forces or enemies who are infiltrating our country.


Which idiot told you that they have proof that 45,000 unvetted people were all US supporters? And actually Roger... I don't believe that you actually believe that these are all US supporters. Not even an old broken down dishonest angry man is quite that stupid.

Or are you?