The sheriff's office received a complaint from a relative of a nursing home resident who died in October 2020. Despite suffering from severe cognitive decline prior to her passing, though, she still somehow managed to cast a vote via absentee ballot in the 2020 presidential election, according to state records.
The nursing home resident lived at the Ridgewood Care Facility. Following a complaint by the deceased resident's daughter, who found it suspicious that her mother was able to vote given her condition at the time, Racine County Sgt. Michael Luell launched an investigation.
Luell found that in 2020 there had been an unusual surge in voting activity at the care facility. Luell reported back that eight out of 42 families of residents at Ridgewood said their loved ones did not possess the cognitive ability to vote, despite having done so.
So a person who died in October was able to cast a mail in ballot for a November election, huh? Now if 20% of those who voted from this particular nursing home did not have the mental capacity to do so, that means someone was filling out the ballots "for them" and then turning them in. There is also no reason to believe that some of those who voted, did not fill out their own ballots even if they had had the mental capacity to do it themselves. That is also part of the scam.
After reports of this nursing home came in, dozens of other complaints from other homes have started trickling in. Seems that someone was going around these Wisconsin nursing homes, filling out and collecting ballots from people that were not only incapable of filling out their own ballot, but incapable of knowing that they were being used and scammed.
This is actually felony voter fraud. But according to liberals it is no big thing. Nothing to see. The most secure election in our lifetime. This sort of evidence of felony election fraud is just more of the "big lie".
4 comments:
Completely eradicate the left's ability to cheat and steal an election and they never win again.
Ever.
That's how bad the fraud is, and it's goes to show just how reliant the left is upon it.
Not enough to affect the overall outcome, will be claim from the trio of idiots..
Oh
GO DAWGS
Let’s see they cheated in GA, AZ, WI, VA. Or there are legitimate questions about the blue held metro areas of these states and that flipped the EC
High quality Pravda
“The QAnon Shaman” was pushed forward as the personification of pro-Trump lawlessness and sedition. But long before Chansley donned his horns and climbed the Capitol steps, Americans who liked Trump were faced with provocations for which they had no recourse. Where was “civility” on February 4, 2020, when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stood up at the end of Trump’s State of the Union Address and tore her printed copy of it in half? Where was “unity” when, with violent riots raging in towns and cities across the country in the summer of 2020, the national media in chorus described the events as “mostly peaceful protests”? Which they were
How were Trump supporters to deal with the manufacture and endless repetition in the mass media of false stories about Trump? The claim that Trump colluded with Russian president Vladimir Putin in the 2016 presidential election turned out to be baseless, but for more than three years it was treated as an article of faith by his opponents. When Trump spoke publicly about the riots in Charlottesville, Virginia, on August 15, 2017, he praised the restraint of parties who peacefully disagree with one another (“very fine people on both sides”) and condemned the rioters: “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.” With dishonest editing, news outlets made it appear that Trump had called neo-Nazis “very fine people.” This has sufficient durability that Joe Biden referred to it when he announced his presidential candidacy, saying that Trump had “assigned a moral equivalence between those spreading hate and those with the courage to stand against it.” The slander continues to be repeated ad nauseam by journalists, politicians, and ordinary people who are unlikely ever to check the actual video. Which by the way I did
Adjectives intended to leapfrog the facts and impose a biased judgment on events have become standard practice in journalism. Claims about voter fraud were nearly always described without further ado as “false” or “baseless”—presumably because, in the minds of the journalists, any possibility that such a claim was factual or supported by strong evidence had to be extinguished. The same automatic negation is applied to any mention of doubts about the prevailing theory of global warming; assertions that humans have only two sexes; ideas that COVID-19 is only a little more deadly than the flu; arguments that women are treated advantageously in the workforce; and demonstrations that police, in general, treat blacks with dignity and respect. Such views are seldom mentioned—but, when they are mentioned, they are reliably accompanied by an editorializing adjective that asserts they are patently untrue.
Indy is right. I was a little crazy mothrf***r for a while but unlike you I have been able to see the world as it is in my own mind Scott.
You believe that your DNA is superior than non Anglo Saxon people like me.
I'm not superior to anyone.
Enjoy trying hard to destroy the Constitution of the United States of America.
You are gone.
Post a Comment