If Kyle Rittenhouse did not have a weapon to defend himself, this was going to be his fate
— Melissa Tate (@TheRightMelissa) November 17, 2021
This trail represents all of us; whether we truly have the right to keep & bear arms & a right to defend ourselves with those arms #KyleRittenhouseIsInnocent pic.twitter.com/GYXtoMiP5e
Wednesday, November 17, 2021
This should happen to anyone who doesn't feel Kyle Rittenhouse had a right to defend himself...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
He provoked the thugs by being there.
These were the kind of thugs the Democrats supported and Kamala bailed out
America is on the edge of the abyss
That's not related to the trial..
I'm very worried about vigilante behavior is going to happen every time when people demonstrate. For either side of politics...
That was mob violence
specialty and tool of the democrats
That's not related to the trial..
When the prosecution literally argued that everyone "takes a beating" from time to time and argues that you don't need to defend yourself from unarmed people... then this is entirely relevant.
Make no mistake, Roger...
You saw the actual video of what was happening. Multiple people chasing a 17 year old kid there to help. One kicking him in the head, someone throwing a rock that hit him in the head, Huber hitting him with a skateboard, and a guy who threatened to murder him trying to take his gun.
The "best" case scenario for Rittenhouse was that sort of beating. THe worst case was his own gun is used against him and he ends up dead.
Either way... the law allows him to protect himself.
I won't address the "vigilante nonsense" because the state never made any case that Rittenhouse was either a "vigilante" or an actual threat to anyone that night.
I'm very worried about vigilante behavior is going to happen every time when people demonstrate. For either side of politics...
Maybe you should concern yourself with all the criminals there burning things down, destroying businesses, and carrying concealed handguns. Not concern yourself so much with a 17 year old kid who spent his time helping people, cleaning graffiti, and putting out fires.
You're priority and defense of the criminal rioters is all we need to know about you, Roger.
Every person filmed beating that poor guy needs to be DEAD.
We went over a year with antifa & BLM going apeshit whenever they wanted to, and leftist politicians made the cops stand down.
I think it's high time we had vigilante justice in America. if leftist leaders won't enforce the law, we should be able to. And if it means that we're stacking leftist corpses like cord wood, so be it.
Fuck these assholes. Let's declare open season on them. They'll fall in line quickly.
Or they die.
Simple as that.
I'm very worried about vigilante behavior is going to happen every time when people demonstrate.
Suddenly you're worried about it?
You should've thought about that before your team burned down Minneapolis over a piece of shit junkie.
What you fear is folks on my team gunning down leftist scumbags like it's their fucking job. And I suppose you SHOULD fear that alky. Those chickens, as Jeremiah Wright used to say, were eventually coming home to roost. And here we are. You cheered for it, you enabled it... did you think the right was just going to roll over?
Heh.
MELLISA TATE CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE INFLUENCER NOW BEING FOLLOW BY OUR NON- BELIEVER HOST!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
BTW.......McCarthy and the GOP now blaming everyone but themselves for the violence of its members posting BS !!!!!! Kevin by his inaction just showed that the GOP is willing to accept anything in the name of keeping power!!!!!!! What a sad performance he had blaming everything Biden has done as an excuse for allowing Gosar to just keep going!!!!!
The 1-6 shaman sentenced to 3 years in the tank........not long enough for me!!!! Kinda takes the wind out of Lil Schitty's sails that these prosecutions were just for minor crimes and not worthy of prison time.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Live Television’ Coverage of Future Trials
ALBERTO LUPERONNov 17th, 2021, 3:12 pm
The judge presiding over the Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial complained about media’s coverage of developments in the case, calling some reports “grossly irresponsible.” Though the judge never shut the door completely, he voiced doubt whether he will allow live television coverage of future trials in his courtroom.
“These are five very reputable, competent attorneys that I’ve practiced with for years, and I think it’s shameful some of the things that are being done to these people,” Judge Bruce Schroeder said in court Wednesday, during juror deliberations. “When I talked about problems with the media, when this trial started, we’re there in part — not fully, but in part — because of grossly irresponsible handling of what comes out of this trial. I will tell you this, I’m going to think long and hard about live television of a trial again next time. I don’t know. I’ve always been a firm believer in it because I think the people should be able to see what’s going on, but what I see, what’s being done is really quite frightening. Frightening, that’s the right word for it.”
Schroeder previously complained about analysis from CNN, though he seemed to mix up comments by CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin with something fellow legal analyst Areva Martin said about a slightly different matter.
The slams against the press on Wednesday came after the judge repeatedly praised the efficiency of the television pool coverage. His issue seemed to focus on broadcast content and not on the mechanics of how the trial was actually being broadcast.
The Rittenhouse trial has become a cause célèbre among the political right. A then-17-year-old went to Kenosha, Wisconsin, ostensibly to help protect private property during spiraling protests over a police officer shooting local man Jacob Blake, who is Black. The night of Aug. 25, 2020 ended with Rittenhouse killing Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26; Rittenhouse injured Gaige Grosskreutz, 27.
The prosecution maintains that Rittenhouse went looking for trouble and caused it. Some testimony revealed that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at other individuals prior to pulling the trigger; other testimony revealed that members of Rittenhouse’s posse were also pointing their weapons’ laser sights from the roof of a car dealership toward people in the streets. The defense argued that Rosenbaum ambushed Rittenhouse, that Rittenhouse had to kill Rosenbaum in self-defense, and that a crowd — including Huber and Grosskreutz — attacked Rittenhouse and would have killed the defendant had the defendant not fought back.
The jury is tasked with considering whether Rittenhouse provoked the attack or whether others placed him in sufficient fear to conclude that the shootings were legally justified. The full jury instructions are available here.
Critics of Schroeder have complained about him stopping attorneys from calling the men who died “victims,” but allowing the defense to use words like “looters” and “rioters.”
Schroeder has repeatedly signaled that he is very much aware of public coverage of the case. He said on Wednesday that his decision to ban the use of the word “victims” during the trial was a matter of fairness for a defendant presumed innocent in the eyes of the law.
“Is it so difficult to just use the term ‘complaining witness,’ instead of prejudging what the jury is here to determine as to whether there is a victim and whether there is a crime committed?” he asked.
Schroeder also addressed public scrutiny over his decision to have Rittenhouse, not a court employee, randomly pick the names of alternate jurors from a tumbler. The judge said he has employed the tactic of asking a defendant to choose the jury after a court clerk’s selection years prior removed a Black juror from a pool which was assembled to judge a Black defendant.
“There was nothing wrong with it. It was all okay, but what do they talk about — ‘optics’ nowadays?” Schroeder said. “Is that the word for things? It was a bad optic, I thought. I think people feel better when they have control, so ever since that case, I’ve had an almost universal policy of having the defendant do the picks.”
He said it had nothing to do with anybody’s race or anything like that.
“I never had a complaint about it before,” the judge said. “In fact, I haven’t had a complaint about here, but some people seem to be dissatisfied with that, and people who want to undermine the result of the trial.”
Critics of Schroeder have complained about him stopping attorneys from calling the men who died “victims,” but allowing the defense to use words like “looters” and “rioters.”
The same rhetoric by Scott on January 6th vs demonstrations that caused property damage and graffiti are terrible crimes.
But the property damage crimes were not an attempted coup.
His unwillingness to separate politics from judgment.
It started the day he was nominated by the royal:-).,Republican party.
https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/kyle-rittenhouse/its-really-quite-frightening-kyle-rittenhouse-judge-rips-media-says-hes-going-to-think-long-and-hard-about-live-television-coverage-of-future-trials/
We know this about you, Scott.
The same rhetoric by Scott on January 6th vs demonstrations that caused property damage and graffiti are terrible crimes.
But the property damage crimes were not an attempted coup.
His unwillingness to separate politics from judgment.
It started the day he was nominated by the royal:-).,Republican party.
The second-biggest program in the Democrats' spending plan gives billions to the rich
The House is expected to vote this week on President Joe Biden's Build Back Better legislation. The social spending bill includes investments in clean energy and affordable child care - but it also includes a $285 billion tax cut that would almost exclusively benefit high-income households over the next five years.
The measure would allow households to increase their deduction from state and local taxes from $10,000 to $80,000 through 2026, and then impose a new deduction cap through 2031. It's the second-most expensive item in the legislation over the next five years, more costly than establishing a paid family and medical leave program, and nearly twice as expensive as funding home-medical services for the elderly and disabled, according to an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/second-biggest-program-democrats-spending-202418744.html
Jan. 6 was a fucking joke alky.
We all know this. You clowns have HAD to politicize it to cover for the epic fail that is Brandon Poopypants.
So shove the coup rhetoric up your nursing home ass.
Jan. 6 was a fucking joke alky.
YOU ARE A FUCKING JOKE ASSHOLE!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! Trump lost and fomented the events in January because assholes like you listened to the lie!!!!!!!!! What a sorry sack of shit you are!!!!!
The jury is tasked with considering whether Rittenhouse provoked the attack or whether others placed him in sufficient fear to conclude that the shootings were legally justified. The full jury instructions are available here.
I think the jury is trying to find it's way to a guilty verdict. That would be the only reason it's taking an obvious case of self-defense so long to decide.
Post a Comment