Well Dakota County Technical College or (DCTC as it is known) is about 15 minutes from my old house. I would know as my oldest son took classes there from the time he was a sophomore in high school until he just recently moved to Texas. He went as part of a special program for selected high school students who were allowed to take college for half their day. My son was the first (and likely still the only) student to ever be allowed on campus as a high school sophomore. After graduation from high school he started with their associates degree program in computer programming.
Either way, I have to wonder if I would have taken the time to go show my support for the President and let him know how much I want to call him Brandon and cheer him on with a good old fashioned let's go chant! After all, it was just a hop, skip, and a jump away!
75 comments:
So Ch puts up a thread based on RED STATE distorted reporting.
From James = " kansasDim"
Denny = "Fuck You"
Roger = " Kputz"
The extent of their collective ability to debate in their topics.
James said the Economic team of Joe's , " The A-Team"
Roger had yet to yell us what "inflation Rates" he is talking about.
Denny thinks unemployment rates are not linked with the Labor Participation rate. Denny do you still hold that view?
The Reverend seems a bit crabby this morning.
One reason for ignoring KansasDim is he constantly lies. I never spoke of any Biden "A-team."
Roger and James are happy with less Americans occupying their old jobs.
They both cheered the outcome on a prior thread just this morning.
Problem:
ADP employment report (monthly change) .534,000. Is down from 570,000 reoccupying of former jobs, then last month.
James, you did.
So your view today is that the Biden Economic team is Not the "A-Team".
You say I did.
Then when I asked you to provide the post where I did, why didn't you?
Now I will ignore you again.
Because your view changed, you just stayed that you no longer see them as the "A-Team".
This is bad news.
Construction spending. Oct.0.2% missed expectations of 0.3%.
Consumer confidence continues to drop.
Reflecting a disastrous Cyber Monday.
The Reverend seems a bit crabby this morning.
No, go look at the really good stuff I'm putting here from John Pavlovitz. I only discovered him three days ago.
See it under the "Is it a blue state issue..." thread.
"The Reverend seems a bit crabby this morning.
"
He does self identify as female.
I’m Not The Radical Left, I’m The Humane Middle
Apparently, I’ve been radicalized and I wasn’t aware.
Certain people call me the “radical Left” all the time.
*I never considered myself radical before.
*I just thought I was normal, ordinary, usual.
*I thought equity was important to everyone.
*I imagined America was filled with people who took that Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness stuff seriously—for all people.
*I thought the Golden Rule was actually mainstream.
Recently I took an inventory of my positions, screening for the extremism:
*I believe in full LGBTQ rights.
*I believe we should protect the planet.
*I believe everyone deserves healthcare.
*I believe all religions are equally valid.
*I believe the world is bigger than America.
*I believe to be “pro-life,” means to treasure all of it.
*I believe women should have autonomy over their own bodies.
*I believe whiteness isn’t superior and it is not the baseline of humanity.
*I believe we are all one interdependent community.
*I believe people and places are made better by diversity.
*I believe people shouldn’t be forced to abide by anyone else’s religion.
*I believe non-American human beings have as much value as American ones.
*I believe generosity is greater than greed, compassion better than contempt, and kindness superior to derision.
*I believe there is enough in this world for everyone: enough food, enough money, enough room, enough care—if we unleash our creativity and unclench our fists.
*I’m not sure how these ideas became radical, though it seems to have happened in the last few years.
*I grew up being taught they were just part of being a decent human being.
*I grew up believing that loving my neighbor as myself, meant that I actually worked for their welfare as much as my own.
*I was taught that caring for the least in the world, was the measure of my devotion to God.
*I thought that inalienable rights of other people were supposed to be a priority as a decent participant in the world.
I don’t think I’m alone.
In fact, I’m pretty sure that most people reside here in this place alongside me:
the desire for compassion and diversity and equality and justice;
that these things aren’t fringe ideologies or extremist positions—but simply the best way to be human.
I think most people want more humanity, not less.
I think the vast middle is exhausted by the cruelty of these days.
That these aspirations seem radical to some people, is probably an alarm that they’ve moved so far into the extremes of their fortified ideological bunkers and been so poisoned by the propaganda, that normal now seems excessive, that equality now seems oppressive, that goodness feels reckless.
Maybe the problem is,
these people are so filled with fear for those who are different,
so conditioned to be at war with the world,
so indoctrinated into a white nationalistic religion of malice
—that they’ve lost sight of what being a human being looks like anymore.
I am pretty sure that I don’t represent the “radical Left,” but the vast, disparate, compassionate, humane Middle;
people who are not threatened by someone else’s presence,
who do not see another person’s gain as their loss,
who don’t worship a Caucasian, American god.
I suppose humanity feels radical to inhumane people.
In that case, I’ll gladly be here in my extremism.
--John Pavlovitz
on Wednesday the court’s conservatives, who constitute a six-member majority on the bench, posed sharp questions about how firmly rooted Roe’s viability standard is in the Constitution.
“If you think that the issue is one of choice, that women should have the choice to terminate their pregnancy, that supposes that there is a point at which they’ve had the fair choice, the opportunity to choice. And why would 15 weeks be an inappropriate line? Viability, it seems to me, doesn't have anything to do with choice. But if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time?” Chief Justice John Roberts asked.
Developing
It might not completely reversed but???
KansasDemocrat said...
"The Reverend seems a bit crabby this morning.
"
He does self identify as female.
well he did self-identify as a "blogger" except he had no blog so he eventually figured it out.
He never could figure out the topic of a thread
but he loves being a swallower
with no followers
ROFLMFAO !!!
Let's Go Brandon !!!
and FJB
that is uniting the country
Ch used to believe a lot of what John Pavlovitz believes.
Until Trump came along.
With the lying POS "pastor" endorsing him that is enough for me
easy to skip right over as I'm sure most everyone else has
Has anyone ever told you what a fucked up life you lead "pastor" ?
They would be telling the truth
FACT CHECK - TRUE
James. Maybe the problem is,
these people are so filled with fear for those who are different,...
We have tribal instincts.. but the vast majority of humans have moved past the fears about that is how we built a civilized world. With cooperation from all sides.
The maga movement is an attempt to return to tribal territories instead of shares property and cooperative with even other person..
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
F Daddy is full of nothing but hateful palaver.
It would be far more interesting to hear Ch tell us what is wrong or "f'd up" in what John Pavlovitz says.
WORD SALAD FOR BREAKFAST AT THE HOME :
roger said:
"The maga movement is an attempt to return to tribal territories instead of shares property and cooperative with even other person."
paleface can't even write a sentence
but can carry water
At least the nursing home has entertainment
1: *I believe we are all one interdependent community.
2: * MAGA will reverse civilization.
Competing tribes.
Decent, honest teller of truth said...
Hey lying POS, why don't you even have a truthful moniker ?
Well guess the same reason you can't follow a thread
But why don't you take your shit to your own blog ?
along with all you followers from your long career.
ROFLMFAO !!!
loves to swallow
but no one follows...
"The maga movement is an attempt to return to tribal territories instead of shareing property and cooperation with every other person."
*I’m not sure how these ideas became radical, though it seems to have happened in the last few years.
well whoever wrote that has their head planted firmly in their own arse...
Let's see... it used to be that being in favor of LGBTQ was to believe in gay marriage and non-discrimination. Now supporint LGBTQ requires lying about rape in school because you have to protect the rapist because he happens to be Trans and admitting that a guy dressed as a girl actually used access to engage in the sexual assault would be bad for your cause.
It used to be that we wanted to judge people by the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin. Now we are told that we must support criminals, drug addicts, child molesters, and domestic abusers in the name of BLM and anyone who harms any of these people must be crushed. In some cases, the child molesters and domestic abusers can be white people committing crimes in support of a BLM protest...
Which came about because a black man who violated a restraining order, sexually assaulted an ex-girlfriend, attempted to leave with her credit card and SUV keys, assaulted the police who were waiting, pulled a weapon, told them he had a gun in the vehicle and then reached it it... and was shot by a white cop... and your cause required stuff to be burned down in support.
Sorry... seems a little radical to me too.
Matt Whitlock
https://twitter.com/mattdizwhitlock/status/1466030012776296452
Still can’t believe that the CENTERPIECE of Biden’s spending plan is increased audits for lower- and middle-class families to pay for tax cuts for wealthy families in blue states.
And they’ve bet the entire bill on it.
Scott Sloofman
Two Pinocchios for Sec. Yellen saying the reckless tax and spending spree is paid for https://washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/01/yellens-claim-that-cbo-found-biden-plan-is-fully-paid/
But the democrat's billionaires and millionaires love it
Wonder what it will do to his poll numbers if it passes
He obviously has no clue and doesn't care.
He's glad to be alive each morning
Even if barely
Ch "answers" Pavlovitz by saying a lot of things that Pavlovitz doesn't say or believe.
I knew Ch would dance.
It's called setting up a staw man and knocking it down, Ch.
Pavlovitz is not a straw man.
You missed your target.
I bet your wife will agree with me.
But I'm glad to see Ch is reading Pavlovitz. You all are, of course.
Sorry... seems a little radical to me too.
It's quite radical. It also sacrifices personal property rights, and demands the individual be subservient to the state.
Ironically, the smallest minority group of all is the minority group leftists hate the most - the individual. This is where you end up when your entire political existence and ideology revolves around identity politics and the politics of envy.
Basic human nature flies in the face of what most liberals demand, which is why they remain perpetually and terminally angry, and they awake each day seeking to right the wrongs that only they perceive.
It's also why their "ideas" must be made mandatory, since any sane person will reject them out of hand, wishing instead to just be left the fuck alone.
I caught you; Omar, You will not live much longer… We see you Muslim and (n-word) bitch, we know what you’re up to. You’re all about taking over our country. Don’t worry, there’s plenty that will love the opportunity to take you off the face of this fucking earth. Come get it. But you fucking Muslim piece of shit. You jihadist. We know what you are. You’re a fucking traitor
Pavlovitz is not a straw man.
It's ironic that you would say this pederast, since much of his list is a collection of straw men.
His list is a utopian chant of kumbaya. As always, the devil is in the details.
Take LGTQWERTY rights for example. I'm in agreement that they deserve the basic human rights that all of us enjoy. Where they lose me is when they DEMAND with the threat of complete and total destruction that everyone comply with their wishes, and face extinction if they refuse for equal and compelling reasons. Read: religious.
The baker or wedding venue owner is a devout Christian? Fine. Don't destroy them. Fucking move on.
Where Pavlov's dog loses me is where ALL leftists lose me - when they insist that their demands reign supreme and trump all others.
Your Pavlov's dog is an an asshole, and a thinly veiled tyrant. He seeks no compromise on his position, and demands compliance. Folks like him deserve to be shot in the face several times.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
I caught you; Omar, You will not live much longer…
Geezus alky, even an assclown like you could forge a better death threat than that.
Tell brother-fucker to do better next time.
Amusing? Yes. Convincing? Not even a little.
Btw, It is nice to see that I continue to live in your head rent-free. LOL.
Thwap!!!
Ever since the election results were released, he stated dancing in circles to agree with Trump no matter what he said about gay marriage and gay rights, and believes that demonstrations
.of course the assault on the Capitol building was no different than property damage crimes and the drug addicted black man
https://politicalwire.com/2021/12/01/ilhan-omar-reveals-audio-of-death-threat/
THWAP THWAP THWAP THWAP THWAP THWAP
I guess Palovitz is correct when he says people like rrb don't reflect Jesus' teachings at all.
He said "love your enemy," not "shoot him in the face several times."
11:57 sounds like the sort of thing rrb, not Jesus, would say.
Ch "answers" Pavlovitz by saying a lot of things that Pavlovitz doesn't say or believe.
Isn't Pavlovitz confused by why "others" believe these things are considered radical. Unless your argument is that Pavlovitz believes these views to be extreme?
Whether or not Pavlovitz wants to admit these things are happening and happening in the name of progressive politics is irrelevant to whether or not these things ARE happening.
I am simply explaining why an ever growing majority of Americans are tired of having this nonsense pushed in their face and then people like Pavlovitz try to "shame" people into submission.
If the left was okay with actually judging people by the content of their character and literally looking for equality where EVERYONE is allowed a say in things, where everyone is allowed to have feelings, and where everyone can have an opinion....
Then the left wouldn't be looking into the abyss right now, wondering what the hell has gone wrong. Watching as more and more Democrats jump like rats from the sinking ship and knowing that 2022 is likely going to be a bloodbath.
Oh... and speaking of radical.
Yeah, it's radical when the Attorney General of the United States tells the FBI to open files on concerned Parents who go to public meetings to voice concern to their elected school boards and wants to label them domestic terrorists.
The majority of Americans (who have had enough of this) have not changed their views. It's that the views everyone has always had about equality, fairness, and freedom is being attacked in the name of liberal progressive policies that are anything but.
Anonymous rrb'sNewRoger'sFuckingdaddy said...
https://politicalwire.com/2021/12/01/ilhan-omar-reveals-audio-of-death-threat/
So she went so far as to have some lackey record that.
LOL. Boy you are gullible, alky.
We should all be thankful that you're locked down so as not to be a danger to society or yourself.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports:
Democrats Roar Back In Georgia
December 1, 2021 at 12:43 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 30 Comments
“After a lackluster general Election Night in November, Democratic leaning candidates roared back Tuesday to flip at least seven local races across Georgia Tuesday, including mayors’ races in Sylvester, Forest Park, and Brunswick,” the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports.
Palovitz is only hoping to "shame" people into being decent instead of indecent.
It's known in Christianity as repentance.
I am simply explaining why an ever growing majority of Americans are tired of having this nonsense pushed in their face and then people like Pavlovitz try to "shame" people into submission.
Precisely, and it's why I have zero tolerance for assholes like Pavlov's dog. The incessant, droning, drumbeat of leftists demands is finally reaching a crescendo, so yes, I would prefer to shoot the son of a bitch rather than be dogged forever by incessant demands to comply.
Donald Would-Be Dictator Trump represents an attempt to overthrow American democracy and cancel what little genuine Judaeo-Christian culture we still have.
Palovitz is only hoping to "shame" people into being decent instead of indecent.
I would argue that everyone has their own opinion of what is or isn't "decent" and that everyone is entitled to those opinions. The reality is that like or not Palovitz is demanding that everyone agree with his particular definition of the term.
I don't find it decent in the least to burn down private property in the name of BLM. I don't find it decent to lie about rape in school in order to protect the narrative that allowing biological males and females to shower and dress together is not dangerous (all in the name of Trans rights). I don't find it decent to harass a baker because he doesn't want to bake your cake. I don't find it decent to start FBI files on people who don't want CRT taught in their schools. I don't find it decent to show support for a criminal because of the color of their skin.
But that is just me...
...an ever growing majority of Americans are tired of having this nonsense pushed in their face...
Would that 'nonsense' include the teachings of Jesus? If so, could you be specific about which of Jesus' teachings you mean?
That was me, not anonymous.
Socialism ="instead of shares property and cooperative with even other person."Alky
A guy that has never owned a clear deed is wanting property given to him.
32 million Acres have been given to Black Only farmers.
Along with 5 Billion Dollars.
Where are the stories of their success?
Organization. Mississippi Solicitor General Scott G. Stewart argued that the people, through their elected politicians, have the right to control pregnant bodies — not the individuals themselves. His opening monologue began as follows:
Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey haunt our country. They have no basis in the constitution; they have no home in our history or traditions; they’ve damaged the democratic process. They’ve poisoned the law. They’ve choked off compromise. For fifty years, they’ve kept this court at the center of a political battle that it can never resolve, and fifty years on, they stand alone. Nowhere else does this court recognize a right to end a human life.
Stewart continued by calling Roe and Casey “failed” decisions:
The Constitution places its trust in the people. On hard issue after hard issue, the people make this country work. Abortion is a hard issue. It demands the best from all of us, not a judgement by just a few of us. When an issue affects everyone, and when the constitution does not take sides on it, it belongs to the people. Roe and Casey have failed, but the people, if given the chance, will succeed.
Justice Clarence Thomas, the longest-serving member of the court, asked the first question by noting that Roe and Casey focus on “privacy” and “autonomy” and not on abortion. Thomas asked Stewart to discuss the difference.
Stewart responded that abortion is “not grounded in the text” of the Constitution and is based on “abstract concepts” that should be rejected.
Thomas later asked what the court should do if it refuses to overrule Casey and Roe. Stewart asked for a “clarified version of the undue burden standard.” Stewart said the court should shift its abortion jurisprudence toward “rational basis review.”
Justice Stephen Breyer asked Stewart what was wrong with the notion that a “divided” nation asked the Supreme Court to lay down a standard that the nation would follow — then read back warnings from Casey about flip-flopping major decisions:
“[T]o overrule under fire in the absence of the most compelling reason to reexamine a watershed decision would subvert the Court’s legitimacy beyond any serious question,” Casey observed.
Stewart said “many, many people . . . vocally wanted the matter returned to them” desired a “fighting chance to have their view prevail” — which they were “not given” under Roe and Casey. Stewart said “factual developments” and the “workability of the undue burden standard” required Casey to be reworked because, in his view, Casey “fails.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor sought to decisively deconstruct Stewart’s arguments. Sotomayor cut into Stewart’s core argument that abortion could be decided by the electorate, not by individual people choosing as they see fit based on their personal values and circumstances.
The right of a woman to choose, the right to control her own body, has been clearly set forth since Casey and never challenged. You want us to reject that line of viability and adopt something different. Fifteen justices over fifty years have — or, I should say, 30 since Casey — have reaffirmed that Casey viability line. Four have said no — two of them members of this Court — but 15 justices have said yes — of varying political backgrounds.
Sotomayor then immediately bemoaned that the original 15-week Mississippi ban was the result of a state House of Representatives that sought to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court’s prior precedents in Roe and Casey merely because there are “new justices” on the court. A subsequent six-week ban laid down by the state senate was also passed for the same articulated reason.
Confirmed , Alky is wrong twice more.
"
BLACK FRIDAY DISAPPOINTS, CYBER MONDAY SALES FALL FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER"
Biden "America is Back" lol.
Stewart started to suggest that the perception that the court was political was the result of the court refusing to follow the text of the Constitution and the historical practice of the country.
Sotomayor fired back.
“How is your interest anything more than a religious view?” Sotomayor quipped after some back-and-forth later in the arguments.
Stewart said the “philosophical questions” posed by abortion were all “reasons to return this to the people, because the people should get to debate these hard issues.”
Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked Stewart if a decision in Mississippi’s favor would “call into question” any of the seminal cases Sotomayor worried about — including Obergefell v. Hodges (same-sex marraige), Griswold v. Connecticut (contraception) and Lawrence v. Texas (a case that constitutionally overturned a Texas law which criminalized sodomy). Stewart said those cases would not be jeopardized by a ruling that overturned Roe and Casey because those other cases involved “clear rules” that did not involve the “purposeful termination of a human life.”
Stewart’s argument belied very clear calls by conservatives — and perhaps even echoed by Justice Thomas himself — to overrule Griswold and to allow states to ban contraceptives.
Sotomayor, whose questions outweighed the voices of the other justices by a wide margin, returned to ask about the issues created by a patchwork of rights which affected poor people more than wealthy people — who might more easily be able to fly to other states which allowed abortions.
So, when does the life of the woman, and putting her at risk, enter the calculus? Right now, facing women who are poor, and that’s 75% of the population . . . who elect abortions before viability, they are put at a tremendously greater risk of medical complications . . . and now the state is saying to these women, “we can choose not only to physically complicate your existence, put your at medical risk, make you poorer”… because we believe, what?
“As far as we’re concerned, it’s there the entire time,” Stewart said — tacitly arguing that the poor women referenced by Justice Sotomayor had their voices adequately heard by the legislature.
Justice Elena Kagan echoed fears that the court would be perceived as a “political institution” that would “go back and forth” depending on who “yells the loudest” in the public — and depending on the court’s makeup or “membership.” Kagan said the current precedent of Roe and Casey are “part of the fabric of women’s existence in this country” and that overturning the precedent required considerable pause.
Stewart retorted that Casey and Roe were “just as bad” 30 and 50 years ago as they are now — and that the incorrect decisions from those years past have led to “decades of damage” across the country. He continued by saying that the “undue burden” rule forced judges to “look within themselves” — a difficult standard that led to incessant appeals.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Stewart to clarify that “many states” would likely continue to allow abortions even if the court allowed states to choose for themselves whether to allow or to disallow the practice. Stewart, naturally, agreed with the justice’s soft-toss prompt to argue for a patchwork of standards across the country as a good thing.
Justice Barrett returned by noting that stare decisis — leaving Roe and Casey intact out of a sense of deference to the court’s past precedent — was “obviously the core of this case.” But she noted that prior decisions have, indeed, been jettisoned by the court. Plessy v. Ferguson, the long-criticized case that held separate-but-equal segregation laws were constitutional, was an example of such an overturned case, Barrett noted.
Barrett asked whether “public reaction” should be a factor in overruling “watershed” decisions — and what other factors the court should consider.
Stewart said the court should look within the Constitution and not be “looking without” at what the public thinks of its decisions. He said the court’s legitimacy was derived from the text of the constitution; it was not based, he argued, on the court’s simple willingness to stand on the shoulders of decisions penned by the court’s previous members.
“I think the court could very, very powerfully say, look, our legitimacy really derives from our willingness to stand strong and stand firm in the face of whatever is going on and stand for constitutional principle . . . to overrule when it’s appropriate,” Stewart said.
Leading up to the arguments, the Washington Post interviewed anti-abortion activists outside the courthouse on a live YouTube stream. When asked what a decision overturning Roe would mean for them, activist Angelique Clark replied by invoking the culture wars.
“When Roe v. Wade is overturned, the culture will be overturned as well,” Clark said. “So we have a culture of life.”
Arguments then turned to the attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which Law&Crime will cover separately.
I love this story .
The person that contracted the new Variant of the Month, was...... fully Vacinated.
😄.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified the first case of the omicron COVID-19 variant in the U.S.
"The California and San Francisco Departments of Public Health have confirmed that a recent case of COVID-19 among an individual in California was caused by the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529)," the CDC wrote in a Wednesday statement.😊
First Drop Ever.
Confirmed , Alky is wrong twice more.
"
BLACK FRIDAY DISAPPOINTS, CYBER MONDAY SALES FALL FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER"
Biden "America is Back" lol.
I think that two possibilities.
I will not be completely overturned.
If Kavanaugh doesn't go to the middle position it will be overturned.
It would hurt the Republicans in history because women will not accept government control over their bodies...
"not accept government control over their bodies..."
Covid, they have.
Roger, I can not believe you are as stupid and clueless as you write here.
Business construction is down in latest report.
Let's Go Brandon
If there is a way to do this.
Prohibiting abortion on victims of rape or incest, they may find a middle conclusion.
Allow abortion for the above reasons.
And in first trimester...
Homebuilders have decided to build less homes.
The F -Team of Biden's have no answers.
The West coast ports are like Madam Secretary Peter Buttigieg, they are butt plugged.
The Jobs numbers Roger posted are completely disappointing, dropped from last report.
"$24 Billion worth of goods sit idle off of West Coast".
F-Team of Biden's simply over matched by real world issues, they have no answers.
Companies added jobs at a robust pace in November despite worries about rising inflation and the threat that the pandemic could slow growth into the winter months, according to a report Wednesday from payroll processing firm ADP.
Private hiring increased by 534,000 for the month, better than the Dow Jones estimate of 506,000 in a labor market that appears to be getting tighter. The total was a decline from the October growth of 570,000, which was revised lower by 1,000.
Big business led job creation by company size, but it was hospitality and leisure that led in the sectors.
The industry that includes bars, restaurants, hotels and similar businesses saw a gain of 136,000, part of the 424,000 positions added in the services sector.
Also posting strong gains were professional and business services with 110,000, trade, transportation and utilities with 78,000, and education and health services, which added 55,000.
On the goods-producing side, construction saw growth of 52,000 while manufacturing was up 50,000.
Kputz said
Business construction is down in latest report.
Let's Go Brandon
Homebuilders have decided to build less homes.
Plus the two West coast harbors los Angeles and Long Island import 40% of supplies for the country from China and India are Korea.
They are open 24/7 instead of 8 hours per day and weekends off
Plus usually construction jobs reduce during winter weather conditions...
On the goods-producing side, construction saw growth of 52,000 while manufacturing was up 50,000.
Private hiring sees better-than-expected growth of 534,000 in November, ADP says
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/01/adp-november-2021.html?__source=androidappshare
Plus usually construction jobs reduce during winter weather conditions...
On the goods-producing side, construction saw growth of 52,000 while manufacturing was up 50,000.
Is the former a pedophile or enabler???
“Jane,” the first accuser to testify against Ghislaine Maxwell at her sex trafficking trial, agreed that Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump when she was 14 years old, long before he became a U.S. president.
“Mr. Epstein introduced you to Donald Trump, correct?” Maxwell’s attorney Laura Menninger asked.
“Jane” answered in the affirmative.
Pressed by Menninger, “Jane” agreed that she said Epstein drove her to Mar-a-Lago in a dark green car when she was 14.
The defense attorney did not explore the alleged interaction much further during her questioning. “Jane” did not make any allegation about sexual abuse—or any other type of wrongdoing—by the man who would later become the 45th president of the United States.
Footage released by NBC News in 2019 showed Trump and Epstein partying at Mar-a-Lago all the way back in 1992. In 2002, Trump told a reporter for New York Magazine who was profiling Epstein: “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy.”
“He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump reportedly added. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
Epstein ex-pilot Lawrence Visoski, the Maxwell trial’s first witness, placed Trump on Epstein’s plane “more than once, I believe.”
Trump distanced himself from Epstein after the latter’s arrest in 2019.
“I had a falling out with him a long time ago,” Trump said at the time. “I don’t think I’ve spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn’t a fan.”
Trump wished Maxwell well after her arrest in 2020.
Trump was not the only powerful person’s name to come up during “Jane’s” testimony.
“You remember Prince Andrew being on a flight with you?” Menninger asked.
“Jane” again said yes, without making any allegation against the British royal.
These exchanges took place on “Jane’s” second day of testimony, during her cross-examination by Maxwell’s lawyer. “Jane,” who is testifying under a pseudonym to protect her privacy, alleged a day earlier that Epstein and Maxwell both sexually abused her when she was 14 years old. Maxwell fondled her breast, and Epstein sexually abused her by masturbating on her, using “painful” sex toys on her, and involving her on multiple occasions in an “orgy,” “Jane” claimed.
Pedophiles...
"Private hiring increased by 534,000"
Down from 570,000 prior reporting period.
You knew that, right, Roger?
Roger, why is the Biden Economy not back.to pre pandemic levels as you predicted it would be by now?
130 cargo ships sit idle off the west coast.
A month ago it was 112 cargo ships
.
In 2002, Trump told a reporter for New York Magazine who was profiling Epstein: “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy.”
in 2019.
“I had a falling out with him a long time ago,” Trump said at the time. “I don’t think I’ve spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn’t a fan.”
math 17 years...
Trump once flew up to New York on Epstein's jet when his jet had mechanical problems
When Trump found out Epstein was bothering guests he barred him from his properties immediately.
-------------------------------
Bill Clinton on the other hand flew on Epstein's jet 27 times including trips to Pedo Island
Ghislaine Maxwell was very close to the Clintons and she was famously captured sitting in an aisle seat at Chelsea's wedding
Epstein had a framed painting of Bill in the famous blue dress hanging on his wall
Before he mysteriously committed "suicide"
odd roger is so confused about who is really tied to Epstein
and who the real pedophiles are
In 2002, Trump told a reporter for New York Magazine who was profiling Epstein: “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy.”
“He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump reportedly added. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
________
Pretty clear who the pedophiles are.
"old roger is so confused" full.stop
He always is .
He sees and post economic data, nut doesn't know what it means.
Like his prediction of a great cyber Monday, it was a disaster.
Before he mysteriously committed "suicide"
You think Trump had him bumped off?
This is what CHT was pointing out about Mrs. James.
"Pretty clear who the pedophiles are." Mrs James
Bearing faults witness against President Trump.
The words are right there.
“It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
--Donald Trump
You can't be serious?
You can't be serious?
Of course the Reverend is serious...
The fact that Clinton flew to the Epstein island multiple times is not proof of anything.
but the fact that Trump made a passing comment about Epstein and his love of younger women makes Trump guilty of what Epstein was doing on the island.
That is simply liberal common sense.
Post a Comment