Yet, here we are two years into this thing and our leading experts now are suggesting that every American will likely eventually catch Covid at least once. So what was the point in spending months and months and months trying to vaccinate our way to herd immunity rather then just allowing it to happen?
Well there are arguments that the vaccine makes the cases milder. But so does a slew of different treatments as well. But unlike the vaccine (which are being pushed 24/7) we have pretty much ignored any and all available treatments... which arguably could have done as well (if not better) at controlling the effects. Interestingly, it's only after Pfizer (big pharma) developed a "new" drug to combat the virus that our powers to be decided to push a treatment. No doubt a lot of money is going to be made from that.
Moreover, we are still looking at 74% of all deaths occurring in people over the age of 65. Of the numerous physical issues that accelerate the Covid virus (obesity, diabetes, heart conditions, etc), the average person who passes from Covid has four of those physical issues. While it's certainly not impossible, it is improbable that healthy working aged people are going to die from Covid.
So now that the experts are admitting that we cannot vaccinate our way out of Covid is anyone gong to admit that they were wrong or at least apologize to those they demonized for suggesting accurately exactly what we know today?
59 comments:
So what was the point in spending months and months and months trying to vaccinate our way to herd immunity rather then just allowing it to happen?
To get bad Orange Man
Bit off topic but you can order your free at home Covid test kits now starting a day early at
https://special.usps.com/testkits
just takes seconds so I can't see this crashing...
Maybe roger can give them as Valentine's Day presents for his roommate
Who knows they may arrive before then if they don't run out
You are assuming that if even the Wrap Speed vaccine injections have not saved a single life?
That's exactly why you believe!!!!!?????????????
So now that the experts are admitting that we cannot vaccinate our way out of Covid is anyone gong to admit that they were wrong or at least apologize to those they demonized for suggesting accurately exactly what we know today?
Fuck no. Whatever the crisis, large or small, the left "never let's it go to waste." And that means to POLITICIZE the living shit out of it.
The Chinese Sneeze was no exception. It allowed them to take down Trump by completely destroying the integrity of our elections. And now that they're backed into a corner of their own doing, their only path to keeping power is to codify nationwide election fraud into law.
Never trust these cocksuckers again. Ever. With any power.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
You are assuming that if even the Wrap Speed vaccine injections have not saved a single life?
That's exactly why you believe!!!!!?????????????
The alky -
When galactic stupidity clashes with galactic dishonesty.
Bit off topic but you can order your free at home Covid test kits now starting a day early at
https://special.usps.com/testkits
Thanks. I'll be destroying them upon receipt.
Moreover, we are still looking at 74% of all deaths occurring in people over the age of 65. Of the numerous physical issues that accelerate the Covid virus (obesity, diabetes, heart conditions, etc), the average person who passes from Covid has four of those physical issues. While it's certainly not impossible, it is improbable that healthy working aged people are doing to die from Covid.
One. The covid-19 virus is not?responsible for most of them, obesity, diabetes, heart conditions, etc),?????,,
improbable is a coincidence????
You believe they wanted to make millions of dollars, by conning millions of people???????
Eventually scientists will be seen as heroes who saved billions of human beings.
Your Schizophrenic behavior is getting worse. It's incurable.
Coronavirus Pandemic: 41 percent approve, 40 percent disapprove
The Economy: 35 percent approve, 44 percent disapprove
Healthcare: 33 percent approve, 37 percent disapprove
The Environment: 36 percent approve, 33 percent disapprove
Crime/Policing: 31 percent approve, 40 percent disapprove
Immigration: 30 percent approve, 44 percent disapprove
Relations with China: 30 percent approve, 38 percent disapprove
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/15/poll-joe-bidens-approval-rating-slumps-plurality-say-handled-coronavirus-worse-than-trump/
Your own food salad is
not impossible, it is improbable
Is an assumption based upon the your political views instead of science.
You have zero experience in medical issues.
2 more dems retiring. Up to 28 now The rats are fleeing the titanic.
Eventually scientists will be seen as heroes who saved billions of human beings.
Behold the abject stupidity of the Alky
Cali had it right.
We had to be rid of the bad orange man, nothing else mattered, and it was necessary to destroy a $23 TRILLION economy.
THIS is just how depraved the left really is. They would've gone full scorched earth to be rid of Trump, turning the nation into an economic wasteland if necessary. Three years in, with the harm done almost incalculable, and that was all that ever mattered to the left.
Your own food salad is
I spoke too soon
LOL
You really are too fucking stupid to grasp this basic concept alky?
While it's certainly not impossible, it is improbable that healthy working aged people are doing to die from Covid.
The company that you called con artists
Pfizer is working to increase supply of Paxlovid.
“These data suggest that our oral Covid-19 therapy can be an important and effective tool in our continued battle against this devastating virus and current variants of concern, including the highly transmissible Omicron,” said Mikael Dolsten, Pfizer’s chief scientific officer.
The Food and Drug Administration last month authorized Paxlovid’s use in people at high risk of severe Covid-19. Health authorities, doctors and patients say the pill is a valuable addition to the Covid-19 medicine chest because unlike other available therapies, people who are newly infected can easily take it at home to avoid becoming hospitalized.
Yet the emergence of Omicron raised questions of whether Paxlovid, as well as other Covid-19 drugs, would remain effective because the new variant carries many more mutations compared with earlier strains, especially to the spike protein that juts from the surface of the virus and plays a key role infecting cells.
Due to the changes, some Covid-19 antibody drugs don’t appear to work as well against Omicron.
Many researchers suspected Paxlovid and another new antiviral pill from Merck & Co. and partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP would work against Omicron because both target the virus’s ability to replicate, rather than the spike protein.
People like you have been killing thousands, a high percentage are Republicans.
Myballs said...
2 more dems retiring. Up to 28 now The rats are fleeing the titanic.
That is actually "wrap" speed
as in this is a wrap
does roger just have a random word generator ?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/pfizers-new-covid-19-pill-works-against-omicron-in-lab-11642528120
I spoke too soon
LOL
Ah fuck it. Go with the Ranch. That's what Gillibrand was after when she blew into one of my favorite restaurants, blowing off the mask MANDATE in the process.
https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Latham-restaurateur-says-Gillibrand-doesn-t-get-16778202.php?IPID=Times-Union-HP-4pack
Without the free Senate seat the worthless twat would be making a living doing real estate closings.
As I said never in human history has so much been foisted on the healthy to allow geriatrics to live a few extra weeks in their nursing homes
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla makes startling admissions about the vaccines
Last week Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, gave an interview to Yahoo Finance and made some truly startling admissions. He said, among other things, that the two original Pfizer injections provide no protection against COVID-19.
"We know that the two doses of the vaccine offer very limited protection, if any," Bourla confessed.
If, then, you have received the two shots, you are not protected against infection or severe COVID or death. Neither are you less likely to transmit the disease to others than your unvaccinated neighbor or co-worker.
To put it in a different way, the first two jabs you have taken are no good to you at this point.
It was less than a year ago that we were promised that these injections would be our ticket to safety, normalcy, and freedom.
Those who believed this and submitted themselves to Pfizer are now for all practical purposes unvaccinated. It is as if they had not taken anything all.
There are hundreds of millions of people around the world who are in this position.
This, however, is not the worst of it. There have been hundreds of thousands of people who have suffered severe side-effects, including death, from these now useless injections.
The chart below gives a sense of the magnitude of this calamity. It shows an explosion of death reports that began in late 2020 when the COVID vaccines were first introduced. The graph is based on data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is a database established by the U.S. government and now jointly managed by the FDA and the CDC.
continues:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/01/pfizer_ceo_albert_bourla_makes_startling_admissions_about_the_vaccines.html
The real Coldheartedtruth Truthseeker
Pfizer’s New Covid-19 Pill Works Against Omicron in LabThree separate, unpublished lab studies indicate Paxlovid is effective against the variant despite its mutations
Covid-19 treatment pills developed by Pfizer at a distribution center in South Korea last Month
Jared S. Hopkins
Updated Jan. 18, 2022 3:05 pm ET
Pfizer Inc.’s new Covid-19 pill, Paxlovid, was effective against the Omicron variant in laboratory tests, an encouraging early sign the drug will be an important tool while the strain spreads.
Warp speed Jimmy Hitler Jr. rrband kputz
Oh boy!
Pfizer came out with yet another drug that will enrich their executives.
Do we even test this shit anymore?
“These data suggest that our oral Covid-19 therapy can be an important and effective tool in our continued battle against this devastating virus and current variants of concern, including the highly transmissible Omicron,” said Mikael Dolsten, Pfizer’s chief scientific officer.
What the data really suggests is that your portfolio is set to explode with profits yet AGAIN, with that sweet, sweet, Uncle Sugar $$$.
unpublished lab studies indicate Paxlovid is effective against the variant despite its mutations.
Leave it to a nursing home inmate to take an experimental drug because he's pissing himself under his bed.
LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO
The House Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol subpoenaed former President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Tuesday along with three other campaign attorneys linked with efforts to overturn the 2020 election results: Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell and Boris Epshteyn.
The subpoena goes after the core of Trump's legal team after the Nov. 3 election, a group that prepared legal arguments following his loss and pushed his baseless claims of election fraud alongside campaign efforts focused on the congressional certification on Jan. 6.
"The Select Committee is looking into the causes that contributed to the violence on January 6th, including attempts to promote unsupported claims of election fraud and pressure campaigns to overturn the 2020 election results. The four individuals we've subpoenaed today advanced unsupported theories about election fraud, pushed efforts to overturn the election results, or were in direct contact with the former President about attempts to stop the counting of electoral votes," Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said in a statement.
DEVELOPING
Capitalism idiot.
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/590275-jan-6-panel-subpoenas-rudy-giuliani-sidney-powell
“The four individuals we’ve subpoenaed today advanced unsupported theories about election fraud, pushed efforts to overturn the election results, or were in direct contact with the former President about attempts to stop the counting of electoral votes,” Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson, Democratic chairman of the panel, said in a statement.
The committee said it is seeking records and deposition testimony from Giuliani in connection to his promotion of election fraud claims on behalf of Trump. The panel is also seeking information about Giuliani’s reported efforts to persuade state legislators to take steps to overturn the election results.
Roger you are not creditable.
unpublished lab studies indicate Paxlovid is effective against the variant despite its mutations.
Maybe Pfizer (or roger) can explain why Pfizer fought not to release Covid vaccine trial data for 75 years.
Or why they blew up the placebo arm of the trial which goes against all logic (and why the FDA allowed them to get away with it.)
Or why they require immunity from lawsuits to produce it
Take away the immunity and the vaccine disappears.
and mountains of money it has produced for the drug industry and those supporting it including state media
Roger Amick said...
“The four individuals we’ve subpoenaed today advanced unsupported theories about election fraud
Is the Jan 6th "committee" going to "subpoena" Hillary and Stacy Abrams next ?
ROFLMFAO !!!
Banana Republic
US Electricity Generators are cutting production because of...........
BIDEN
His spike in clean buring natural gas price .
Here are some ideas:
1. One ballot dropbox per 300,000 people.
This comes from a law that Texas passed making it so only one country could have a dropbox. So, for small counties like Loving County, which has just 169 residents, it isn't a big deal. For Harris County, with just under 5 million residents, it's a problem.
Making a law that makes drop boxes proportionate to population density, rather than just land mass, would upend the GOP's entire strategy.
2. A law that protects any person who gives food or water to any person for any reason
Georgia passed the law that said no one besides authorized officials could bring food or water to a person standing in line to vote. Georgia has a Good Samaritan Law that protects anyone against liability "when they voluntarily go out of their way to selflessly provide assistance or care to another individual who is injured, in danger, or who is otherwise facing a medical or life-threatening emergency."
Congress could simply add to the existing laws to provide that citizens are protected from arrest or prosecution for offering food or water to any person at any time.
3. Free voter ID
One of the biggest battles between Republicans and Democrats is over voter IDs. They argue that an ID is needed for any manner of things but not for voting. Democrats have opposed this because an ID is difficult to obtain for people who don't have cars and instead rely on public transportation.
Democrats could easily cede this argument to Republicans and agree that all states could provide IDs, so long as they provide a useable voter ID for free to anyone who wants one. The ID wouldn't have to qualify as a driver's license or a REAL ID. In fact, most people get a voter card in the mail when they register to vote, which they would simply include with a photo. County officials should be responsible for working with people who need extra help locating the proper documents and information necessary to ensure the voter ID can be accurate.
4. Provide funding for states to join a unified voter system
The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is a system that all states use to ensure the voter rolls are accurate. However, just 31 states and Washington, D.C. use the system, including Republican and Democratic states. Republicans should love the system because it makes it easy to catch double voting by mail in multiple states. But if a person votes in Oklahoma by mail and then votes again by mail or in-person in Florida, it wouldn't be spotted in ERIC because Oklahoma isn't part of their system.
5. End Felony Disenfranchisement
A few states, including a number of GOP-controlled ones, have passed ballot initiatives saying that once someone serves their time in prison then they should be allowed to vote again when they're let out. Since the majority of the GOP states already have laws that allow people to vote after their sentence, the federal government could agree to the reform as well.
6. Mandate at least two weeks of early voting
Americans love early voting and they use it either by mail or in person. They like to get it out of the way, particularly if it interferes with work. Over 30 states offer early voting already, including many Republican states. Voting on Tuesday is an outdated tradition, which is why the federal government should ensure two full weeks of early voting that would give voters easier access to the polls.
7. Protections for those with disabilities
The Americans with Disabilities Act outlines all of the mandates that governments must do to ensure that those who are disabled have equal access. But often those requirements don't necessarily extend to voter assistance. Ramps on sidewalks are mandated into and out of polling places for those who need them. The Voting Rights Act of 1964 ensured that ballots for the blind would be provided. But there is still an argument over those with intellectual or mental health disabilities. Protections should be in place that would cut through the prejudicial assumption that they're incapable of voting with or without assistance. Such an issue should earn easy support from both parties.
There are many more solutions that Democrats could attempt that Republicans could and should support -- or at the very least voting against it would make them look absurd.
New renewable power plants are reducing U.S. electricity generation from natural gas.
US Energy Information administration
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Capitalism idiot.
But not the "regulated" capitalism that you always want. For your "bottom up" economy.
No, this is Pfizer hoovering up taxpayer dollars like it's going out of style. Virtually limitless amounts of Government $$$. And alky the hypocrite has no problem with it at all.
No one who works at Pfizer is at the "bottom" alky.
This is like that Die Hard movie where the bad guys need a fleet of 10-wheel dump trucks to haul their fucking loot.
You are assuming that if even the Wrap Speed vaccine injections have not saved a single life?
The concept of vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, but don't treat anything probably cost lives. With our medical advances, hospitals, and resources, the United States "should" have had one of the best Covid responses on the planet. Instead we appeared to have failed and have more death than most other first world countries.
But this isn't an argument as to whether the vaccine saved lives or not. Of course a vaccine can save lives. But if it is your only means to combat the virus, then it better be foolproof, and our vaccine is not foolproof.
My issue is with people like Dr Birx who had complete hissy fit because Trump wanted to take a meeting with people who oddly probably turned out to be more right than wrong, while Birx's opinion was more wrong than right. Yet she was the one demanding that these people were trying to murder Americans.
Are you denying that nearly 900,000 Americans are dead and we may even go over a million people dead? Are you denying that Fauci and gang are now suggesting that every American (vaccinated or not) will likely catch Covid?
Because if you are "NOT" denying these facts... then obviously the concept of vaccinating ourselves to immunity failed. That is not an opinion, Roger. It's an undeniable fact.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Here are some ideas:
The topic is covid alky. Not your voter fraud fantasies.
What kind of idiot believes this?
3. Free voter ID
One of the biggest battles between Republicans and Democrats is over voter IDs. They argue that an ID is needed for any manner of things but not for voting. Democrats have opposed this because an ID is difficult to obtain for people who don't have cars and instead rely on public transportation."
Why the fuck do we need ANY drop boxes ?
Can't figure out how to get to a polling place ?
Can't figure out how to mail in a ballot ?
How did we survive for hundreds of years without them ?
Well they are great for dropping off hundreds of ballots at a time
and are unattended, so there is that
goes well with not matching signatures too
and sending out zillions of unrequested ballots
* banana republic
Your own food salad is not impossible, it is improbable
Roger...
the full sentence... "While it's certainly not impossible, it is improbable that healthy working aged people are going to die from Covid."
Is grammatically correct and makes total sense to anyone reading.
Well almost everyone. Apparently it's above your pay grade./
One. The covid-19 virus is not?responsible for most of them, obesity, diabetes, heart conditions, etc),?????,,
improbable is a coincidence????
I have no idea what you are trying to tell us Roger...
But the FACT is according to the CDC, the average person who passes away from Covid has four of the Markers making them susceptible to more serious effects from Covid. The other fact is that nearly 650,000 of our deaths are people over the age of 65.
That according basic everyday common sense tells us that someone who is under the age of 65 and has none of the physical markers (not obese, no heart condition, no asthma, no diabetes, etc...) does not have a high probability of dying.
It's not "impossible" that a perfectly healthy young person might die from it. But the numbers tell us as a matter of fact that it is very unlikely.
One of the biggest battles between Republicans and Democrats is over voter IDs. They argue that an ID is needed for any manner of things but not for voting. Democrats have opposed this because an ID is difficult to obtain for people who don't have cars and instead rely on public transportation."
This has been democrat bullshit for fucking ever. It is absolutely fucking impossible to participate in modern society at any level for even the most trivial and minor transactions without a valid government issued ID.
And it is RACIST and INSULTING to claim otherwise.
Voting needs to be made harder, not easier, because it is that important and should not be taken lightly.
I would make one concession - Make election day a federal holiday and give everyone the whole fucking day off. Then there are no excuses.
Absentee ballots should only be issued for a clearly defined set of reasons, and should be tracked with a chain of custody like a fucking pre-employment drug test.
If all of the changes that democrats want to make to our election system favored republicans in the very least, we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
My election reform:
1) Allow absentee ballots for whatever reason. But they must first request this online with proof of identification and have them add a personal ID number (such as a PIN). If they ballot comes back without that same ID number, the PIN, and a valid signature - the counters burn it in a fireplace on the spot.
2) Have drop boxes.. but with snipers hiding somewhere. Anyone caught putting in more than one ballot will be shot on sight. Ballot harvesters will be summarily executed putting an end to the practice.
3) Allow 15 days of early IN PERSON early voting - that require you AND your physical Identification. You can register and vote on the same day IF YOU HAVE your physical ID. Otherwise, go pound dirt.
4) Make Election day a holiday so (as Rat states) so there are no excuses.
Hard hitting reporting from the Atlanta Urinal Constipation
Stop the press! Atlanta Journal-Constitution blows the lid off GOP Senate hopeful Herschel Walker’s racy ‘Instagram follows
Who knew grown men like to look at scantily clad women
neurodegenerative disorders described in her paper.
“The science is never easy, but it’s quite fascinating what happens. The vaccine gets injected into the arm, the muscles cells get very upset. They bring in a whole bunch of troops. The immune cells come in, take up the vaccine themselves. They take up the nanoparticles. They start making spike protein. The particles basically get your cells to produce lots and lots of spike protein in a hurry. Spike is the most toxic part of the virus. And these immune cells then rush into the lymph system, many of them end up in the spleen, which is where you want them to be to produce the antibodies. That’s the goal.
“So they’ve designed it, and they’re very happy to see that they end up in the spleen making lots of spike protein, and then invoking an immune response that produces antibodies by the B cells. But the problem is that those germinal centers in the spleen are really the center place where Parkinson’s disease develops and probably many other neurodegenerative diseases. But for Parkinson’s, it’s been very well laid out that you get that prion like proteins, even from infections in the gut, immune cells take them to the spleen, to those germinal centers, and then they start spewing out exosomes. These are little lipid particles that are released by the cells unloading that toxic protein and shipping it along the vagus nerve to the brain. This is sort of well-known with respect with Parkinson’s disease, and that’s the model I’m using. It feels to me like this is the perfect set up for it.”
In her paper, Seneff described how vaccines induce toxic prion-like proteins that can trigger neurodegenerative diseases.
“The CDC web site on prion diseases states that ‘prion diseases are usually rapidly progressive and always fatal,'” the paper states. “It is now believed that many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may be prion diseases, and researchers have identified specific proteinaceous infectious particles linked to these diseases.”
“The spike protein generated endogenously by the vaccine could also negatively impact the male testes,” the paper states, adding, “Several studies have now shown that the coronavirus spike protein is able to gain access to cells in the testes via the ACE2 receptor, and disrupt male reproduction.”
Seneff’s study concludes with warnings that mRNA vaccines “harbor the possibility of potentially tragic and even catastrophic unforeseen consequences,” and issues numerous surveillance practice recommendations for how to proceed with the vaccine scheme, if at all.
Ch says:
"So what was the point in spending months and months and months trying to vaccinate our way to herd immunity rather then just allowing it to happen?"
ANSWER:
A really STUPID question.
Because by vaccinating, we avoided a lot of more serious cases and a huge number of ADDITIONAL deaths.
There is a dearth of data in Ch's thread article, mostly just his idle top of his head speculations.
Because by vaccinating, we avoided a lot of more serious cases and a huge number of ADDITIONAL deaths.
You wanna prove that pedo?
How about all the extra deaths and long term mental issues in the country’s youth, but as you live a barren life you wouldn’t know anything about that. The increased deaths from cancer, heart disease and every other malady known to man so we could attempt to keep a few geezers like you alive. Lives ruined from an unnecessary shutdown.
Fuck you pedo and you are about to rue the day, you assholes did this to get rid of bad Orange man.
Reverend has no proof of anything. Never does.
He just demands that what he says is true.
James, show us your proof?
Ch says:
"So what was the point in spending months and months and months trying to vaccinate our way to herd immunity rather then just allowing it to happen?"
ANSWER:
A really, really, really STUPID question.
Because by vaccinating, we avoided a lot of more serious cases and a huge number of ADDITIONAL deaths.
Ch quoted me:
"Because by vaccinating, we avoided a lot of more serious cases and a huge number of ADDITIONAL deaths."
_____
Ch said:
Really?
How many additional deaths can you prove we would have otherwise had versus what exactly?
I recall when Sweden had way more deaths per capita than we did and everyone said they were crazy. Now we have 1.72 times as many deaths per capita in spite of Sweden having a more "urban" population than we do?
Who is crazy now?
The reality here is nobody is saying that we should not have used the vaccine, Reverend. Even Trump (who was for the vaccine) was also pushing a variety of treatments (now used throughout the world). Of course, those treatments (used successfully throughout the world) were rejected here.
The issue is whether or not we should have relied 100% on the strategy of being able to contain the virus with a vaccine and all of the lockdowns and other measures. Once sick, we just told people to stay home.
When other countries just provided people vaccines and actually provided treatment when they got sick from Covid. Maybe they told people to be careful, but lockdowns and mandates and such...
Well what did it get us if we all end up catching the virus anyways?
_______
MY ANSWER:
You absolutely refuse to give due credit to the abundant testimony of health care workers in our hospitals who insist that those who are now catching the raging Omicron form of the virus are suffering and dying far less IF THEY HAVE BEEN VACCINATED, AND EVEN MORE SO IF THEY HAVE RECEIVED THEIR BOOSTERS.
You can deny that as merely "anecdotal," but you could never convince those health care workers. They have been seeing it and are continuing to see it with their own eyes.
Most heart breaking are those relatives who beg that their sick and dying unvaccinated loved ones get emergency vaccinations only to be told they have waited too late for that to do them any good.
But you will spin on and on and on...incessantly.
J
CDC
COVID-19
Benefits of Getting Vaccinated
Updated Jan. 11, 2022
What You Need to Know
Getting vaccinated against COVID-19 can lower your risk of getting and spreading the virus that causes COVID-19. Vaccines can also help prevent serious illness and death.
All steps have been taken to ensure that vaccines are safe and effective for people ages 5 years and older.
If you already had COVID-19, you should still get a COVID-19 vaccine for added protection.
When you are up to date on COVID-19 vaccination, you can resume many activities with proper precautions (e.g., mask wearing in indoor public spaces).
COVID-19 Vaccination Is a Safer Way to Build Protection
Getting a COVID-19 vaccination is a safer way to build protection than getting sick with COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccination helps protect you by creating an antibody response without you having to experience sickness.
Getting sick with COVID-19 can have serious consequences.
Getting sick with COVID-19 can cause severe illness or death, even in children, and we can’t reliably predict who will have mild or severe illness.
You may have long-term health issues after COVID-19 infection. Even people who do not have symptoms when they are initially infected can have these ongoing health problems.
People who are sick with COVID-19 may spread COVID-19 to others including friends and family who are not eligible for vaccination and people at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19
COVID-19 Vaccines Are Safe for Children and Adults
While COVID-19 vaccines were developed quickly, all steps have been taken to ensure their safety and effectiveness.
Hundreds of millions of people in the United States have received COVID-19 vaccines under the most intensive safety monitoring program in U.S. history.
A growing body of evidence shows that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the known and potential risks. CDC recommends an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) in most circumstances based on an updated risk-benefit analysis.
Before recommending COVID-19 vaccines, including for children ages 5 years and older, scientists conducted clinical trials with thousands of adults and children and found no serious safety concerns. Learn more about the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination for children and teens.
Everyone who receives a COVID-19 vaccine can participate in safety monitoring by enrolling themselves and their children ages 5 years and older in v-safe and completing health check-ins after their COVID-19 vaccination. Parents and caregivers can create or use their own account to enter their children’s information.
COVID-19 vaccines are effective
COVID 19-vaccines are effective and can lower your risk of getting and spreading the virus that causes COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccines also help prevent serious illness and death in children and adults even if they do get COVID-19.
Recent data suggest COVID-19 vaccines become less effective at preventing infection or severe illness over time, especially for people ages 65 years and older. This is why booster shots are recommended for people ages 12 years and older who have completed their primary vaccination series. However, even as the vaccine’s ability to prevent infection decreases with time, COVID-19 vaccination continues to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death when people become infected with COVID-19.
People who have certain medical conditions or who are taking medications that weaken their immune system may not be completely protected even if they completed the primary vaccination series. Some people who are moderately or severely immunocompromised should get an additional primary dose of COVID-19 vaccine and a booster shot.
About Variants
Viruses are constantly changing, including the virus that causes COVID-19. These changes occur over time and can lead to the emergence of variants that may have new characteristics. Vaccines continue to reduce a person's risk of contracting the virus that cause COVID-19. Vaccines are highly effective against severe illness.
COVID-19 vaccination is a more reliable way to build protection
The level of protection people get from having COVID-19 (sometimes called natural immunity) may vary depending on how mild or severe their illness was, the time since their infection, and their age; and there is still not an antibody test available that can reliably determine if a person is protected from further infection.
All COVID-19 vaccines currently available in the United States are effective at preventing COVID-19. Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccination gives most people a high level of protection against COVID-19.
You should get a COVID-19 vaccine, even if you already had COVID-19. Emerging evidence shows that getting a COVID-19 vaccine after you recover from COVID-19 illness provides added protection to your immune system.
Once Up to Date on COVID-19 Vaccination, You Can Start Doing More
When you are up to date on COVID-19 vaccination, you can resume many activities with proper precautions (e.g., wearing a mask while indoors in public spaces).
When you are up to date on COVID-19 vaccination, you may not always need to wear a mask in public.
In general, you do not need to wear a mask in outdoor settings.
In areas with high numbers of COVID-19 cases, consider wearing a mask in crowded outdoor settings and for activities with close contact with others who are not up to date on COVID-19 vaccination.
You should continue to wear a well-fitting mask indoors in public if you are in an area of substantial or high transmission to maximize protection and prevent possibly spreading COVID-19 to others.
People who are up to date on COVID-19 vaccination who travel within the United States do not need to get tested for COVID-19 before or after travel or self-quarantine after travel.
Most people who are up to date on COVID-19 vaccination with no COVID-like symptoms do not need to quarantine or be restricted from work or school following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
People up to date on COVID-19 vaccination who have come into close contact with someone with COVID-19 should
be tested at least 5 days after they last had close contact with someone with COVID-19 and wear a well-fitting mask around others for 10 days.
People who have a condition or are taking medications that weaken their immune system may not be completely protected even if they have completed a primary series of a COVID-19 vaccine. They should continue to take all precautions recommended for unvaccinated people, including wearing a well-fitting mask, until advised otherwise by their healthcare provider
explore whether they are eligible for an additional primary dose of COVID-19 vaccine get a booster shot after completing their COVID-19 vaccination primary series.
Stupid you can’t prove a negative but keep trying.
James you simply aren’t that smart nor educated
But flail away
You can deny that as merely "anecdotal," but you could never convince those health care workers. They have been seeing it and are continuing to see it with their own eyes.
No pedo it’s subjective not anecdotal
vaccination gives most people, may not be completely protected, gives most people a high level, You should continue to wear a well-fitting mask indoors in public if you are in an area of substantial or high transmission to maximize protection and prevent possibly spreading COVID-19 to others.
Next sentence
Most people who are up to date on COVID-19 vaccination with no COVID-like symptoms do not need to quarantine or be restricted from work or school following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
People up to date on COVID-19 vaccination who have come into close contact with someone with COVID-19 should
be tested at least 5 days after they last had close contact with someone with COVID-19 and wear a well-fitting mask around others for 10 days.
You aren’t bright enough to realize you’ve proven my point
LOL
But keeping pumping money big Pharma, I’m sure they’re filling Donks re-election coffers, just like Solyndra….
And then claim you’re for the people
Idiot
Post a Comment