Thursday, June 23, 2022

Never underestimate Biden's ability to fuck things up!

The Ukraine war response is fast becoming Biden’s second blunder
The New York Times reported recently on a June 16 visit to Kyiv by leaders of four NATO countries — France, Germany, Italy and Romania — during which they delivered a dual message to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. At the more public and cosmetic level, the Western leaders demonstrated their support against Russian aggression by offering Ukraine a path to European Union membership but they “did not promise the country additional heavy weapons on the scale it says it needs to repel a bloody Russian advance in the East.”
The European leaders carefully adhered to the Biden administration’s policy by insisting “they were not pressing Mr. Zelensky to accept a peace deal with Moscow,” according to the Times. But, as reflected in the palpable disappointment of the Ukrainians, the EU’s key leaders were clearly signaling the limits of their own support.
This new European stance now places the Biden administration on the horns of a possibly insoluble dilemma, as David Goldman reported in a recent Asia Times article. With the war having reached a critical stage and the world economy reeling from supply shocks in energy and food previously supplied by Russia and Ukraine, Goldman asserts that America’s boasts of “driving Putin from power, destroying Russia’s capacity to make war, and halving the size of Russia’s economy look ridiculous in retrospect.”
A slippery slope filled with a series of bad choices awaits the Biden administration. A compromise peace, which much of the world apparently desires for various self-interested reasons, inevitably would begin with negotiations. Unless Russia is allowed to continue its territorial gains during the negotiations, a ceasefire would be required — and historically, these involve freezing the existing territorial division between combatants for the duration. As we have learned from Korea, the Middle East, and other such arrangements, these temporary demarcation lines often evolve into de facto permanent borders.
Russia has made strategic territorial gains, so such an outcome would be disastrous for Ukraine — and humiliating for the United States. Yet, since European leaders and the U.S. so far have refused to supply the arsenal of modern weaponry that Ukraine has said it needs to survive, it is difficult to see any other scenario unfolding.

Russian troops are pretty close to being in full control of Luhansk and are in control of about 60% or so of Donetsk. Those were the two separatists areas that was the pretense to Putin's original invasion. They also control most of the southern bay area of Ukraine and can now tie Luhansk and Donetsk to Crimea with full areas of control for probably a hundred miles or more in coast. They have not made it anywhere near Odesa (even though that seems in their sights at one cime) and do not seem to be moving much in that direction any more.

If you want my humble opinion I suspect that Putin will put off any form of peace talks until he at least has full control of Luhansk and possibly a bit more of Donetsk. If he could negotiate from that position then there is a pretty good chance that new borders would be created for both Luhansk and Donetsk and will be basically annexed by Russia (just as Crimea was). It might be slightly "different" land, but in terms of mass it probably evens out and is more strategically appropriate for Russia.

The idea that Russia will at this point pull out of all of Ukraine, give all of these gains back to Zelensky and include Crimea for good measure seems little more than a figment of someone's imagination right now. Ever since Putin decided to call off the full frontal attacks on Kiev, the war has gone much better for his troops. Moreover it seems that Ukraine is now taking more of the brunt of the casualties (which is what happens during countermeasures when you are now attacking fortified positions rather than defending them). 

To the degree that Biden pulled off a blunder here as suggested by the Hill author? Well it has to be this idea that we could just straddle the situation and somehow not come out and give Ukraine what they really needed but also not just leave them their to be slaughtered. We have them enough to prolong  the war, but not enough to win it. This, again in my humble opinion, is the worst thing we could have done. Either help them win or get the f out of the way. 


73 comments:

Roger Amick uncensored said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
James's Fucking Daddy said...


Never underestimate Biden's ability to fuck things up!
The Ukraine war response is fast becoming Biden’s second blunder


FACT CHECK - FALSE

maybe his 30th blunder

if we don't start counting from day 1

Roger Amick uncensored said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
James's Fucking Daddy said...


Hey roger, you need to be committed

Oh never mind, you already are

What a "shocker"


James's Fucking Daddy said...

Greg Price

STEP-BY-STEP INSTRUCTIONS:

https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1540086506030768128

Joe Biden isn't senile, guys. His handlers just have to give him step by step directions for every single thing that he does.


a complete senile embarrassment

just like roger

James's Fucking Daddy said...


Now "Anonymous" roger

ROFLMFAO !!!



you even embarrass the 5th Beatle

every day is Jan 6th

how could we possibly identify you ???

Roger Amick uncensored said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Caliphate4vr said...

The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance.

Albert Einstein

Alky you have both in spades

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
James's Fucking Daddy said...


Roger Amick uncensored said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


CHT for the win !!!

Caliphate4vr said...

Oh the spamming that is about to begin……l

It needed to be done.

Anonymous said...

Yes,
"CHT for the win !!!".

Anonymous said...

Biden said small businesses should reduce prices "Because WE are at WAR"

War with whom?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Caliphate4vr said...

North Cackalacky can defend their voter ID laws per SCOTUS

BREAKING: Supreme Court rules that GOP lawmakers can defend voter ID law in North Carolina after state AG refuses to uphold it

Thank you Bad Orangeman

Anonymous said...

Funny shit

"Roger Amick uncensoredJune 23, 2022 at 4:58 PM

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator."

Roger can't post on topic.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
NYB said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Caliphate4vr said...

The demented obsession continues…..

Get help Alky them to up the meds, they bring in that paper cup that I’ll doing Jell-O shots out of this weekend

Fuck you’re boring

Roger Amick uncensored said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Not an isolationist

WASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) - The United States will provide an additional $450 million in security assistance to Ukraine, including more long-range rocket systems, U.S. officials said on Thursday.

Moscow’s forces are advancing in Ukraine’s east in a bid to capture the industrial heartland known as the Donbas, where Ukraine fears some of its troops could be encircled in a Russian pincer move.

In a statement, the Pentagon said the package would be valued at up to $450 million and include four additional High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), 18 coastal and riverine patrol boats and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

Anonymous said...

You really have lost your mind Scott.

Censorship is evidence

Anonymous said...

Under Biden's DHS, all dissenters are now 'domestic extremists'

By Dale Wilcox

"Too much public discourse today is sullied by ad hominem rhetoric, that is, attempts to discredit an argument not by proving that it is unsound but by attacking the character or motives of the argument's proponents."

—Justice Samuel Alito, Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 1426 (2020)

The problem with fundamentally transforming a great, freedom-loving nation into something else is that not everyone is in favor of the idea.  Building support for your position with a better argument than your detractors can be a slow, frustrating process.

The faster, more Machiavellian route is to declare your critics to be enemies of the state, deserving of both marginalization from decent society and denial of their basic rights as citizens.

Anonymous said...

Lol@Roger

Trump owns him

Anonymous said...

Rep. Matt Gaetz

@RepMattGaetz

·

Follow

The January 6 Committee is an unconstitutional political sideshow. It is rapidly losing the interest of the American people and now resorts to siccing federal law enforcement on political opponents.

2:40 PM · Jun 23, 2022


Anonymous said...

Roger and James were holding Biden out as FDR/Patton for his "leadership " in our newest war.

Now , well, crickets.

C.H. Truth said...

You are allowed to post all of your nonsense about Jan 6th on any Jan 6th thread... and you have already ruined multiple threads with the silliness.

Tell me something Roger.


Why would you feel the need to double, triple, or quadruple post the same thing on multiple threads?

Why does that make you feel better?

Anonymous said...

The War Time President has lost the War to Putin.

What went wrong with Joe's Leadership?

Adolf said...

The corrupt Biden FBI is arresting America heroes.

A U.S. Naval reservist who was assigned to an agency that operates spy satellites told an undercover FBI agent that he stormed the U.S. Capitol with members of the far-right Proud Boys extremist group and has espoused anti-government and antisemitic ideologies, federal authorities said in court records unsealed on Thursday.

Framed by them

Caliphate4vr said...

OMG!!!!!

YOU take YOUR seat!!!

This is pathetic

Anonymous said...

European leaders have granted Ukraine candidate status, in a historic decision that opens the door to EU membership for the war-torn country and deals a blow to Vladimir Putin. Trump’s hero πŸ™Œ

EU leaders meeting in Brussels approved Ukraine’s candidate status on Thursday night, nearly four months after the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, launched his country’s bid to join the bloc in the early days of the Russian invasion. Moldova was also given candidate status.


Zelenskiy immediately welcomed the move, calling it “a unique and historic moment” in relations with the 27-nation bloc. “Ukraine’s future is in the EU,” he tweeted.

“It’s a victory,” Zelenskiy said on Instagram. “We have been waiting for 120 days and 30 years,” he added, referring to the duration of the war and the decades since Ukraine became independent on the breakup of the Soviet Union. “And now we will defeat the enemy.”

Anonymous said...

The Russian military has made some progress but our country is not deserting like πŸ˜’

The White House will send four additional rocket launchers to Ukraine, as part of a new $450 million package of military assistance, the Department of Defense announced on Thursday.

The move will double the number of High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems sent to Ukraine amid that nation’s battle with Russian forces for control of the eastern Donbas region.

“The United States continues to work with its Allies and partners to provide Ukraine with capabilities to meet its evolving battlefield requirements,” acting Pentagon press secretary Todd Breasseale said on Thursday in a news release.

In addition to the rocket launchers, the aid package also includes weapons and equipment such as rounds of ammunition, tactical vehicles, machine guns and patrol boats.

National Security Council coordinator John Kirby said at Thursday’s White House press briefing that the new aid package would bring the United States’ total security assistance to Ukraine to about $6.1 billion since Feb. 24.

“The United States will continue to bolster Ukraine’s defenses and support its sovereignty and its territorial integrity,” Kirby said. “The bravery and determination of the Ukrainian armed forces, let alone their fellow citizens, continues to inspire the world, and we are committed to standing with them as they fight for their freedom.”

The news comes days after POLITICO first reported that officials crafting the next tranche of aid at the Pentagon were leaning toward sending four units of the HIMARS mobile rocket launcher.

The first four units the U.S. approved arrived in Ukraine this week, along with medium-range rockets that can strike targets up to 50 miles away, Ukrainian officials announced. The United Kingdom is also sending three units of a similar weapon, the American-made M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System, with a range of 50 miles. Germany will also transfer three M270s to Kyiv.

The first group of roughly 60 Ukrainians being trained on the HIMARS is now ready to use them, Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said last week.

The Associated Press first reported that the White House is set to announce a new $450 million package of military aid to Ukraine and that it will include HIMARS, but did not report how many units the tranche would include.




Anonymous said...

Roger is always defensive and plays a victim here and in his shit of a low value life.

Now , Roger is attempting to shift Bidens lost war to others.

Biden put in the tar and feathers himself.

Anonymous said...

 announcement came as Moscow’s forces advanced in Ukraine’s east in a bid to capture the industrial heartland known as the Donbas, where Ukraine fears some of its troops could be encircled in a Russian pincer.

Ukraine has said it needs the HIMARS systems to better match the range of Russian rocket systems that it has said are being extensively used to pummel Ukrainian positions in the Donbas.

Washington said it has received assurances from Kyiv that those longer-range weapons would not be used to attack Russian territory, amid fears of an escalation of the conflict.

Anonymous said...

Ot but interesting to me.

Georgia Power is building two reactors, among the first new U.S. nuclear units to break ground in more than three decades. The project is behind schedule and billions of dollars over its estimated cost. “We had to train welders and all these other crafts to be nuclear workers,” said Will Salters, a union official working on the construction at the Vogtle plant in Burke County, Ga. “We hardly had them in the country. All the ones we had were either retired or passed away.”


In the 70s and 80s I worked on big projects like this.

It is not easy. The unions train craftsmen. You wouldn't believe how tough and dangerous. I was usually the guy who laid out the walls and ceiling and worked with the other trades men.


Anyhow have a great night πŸŒ™

Caliphate4vr said...

Blogger C.H. Truth said...
You are allowed to post all of your nonsense about Jan 6th on any Jan 6th thread... and you have already ruined multiple threads with the silliness


This is why he is where is….Lydia was wise

He’s an ignorant, obstinate, arrogant (for reasons no one knows) ass

Caliphate4vr said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Ot but interesting to me.

Georgia Power is building two reactors, among the first new U.S. nuclear units to break ground in more than three decades. The project is behind schedule and billions of dollars over its estimated cost. “We had to train welders and all these other crafts to be nuclear workers,” said Will Salters, a union official working on the construction at the Vogtle plant in Burke County, Ga. “We hardly had them in the country. All the ones we had were either retired or passed away.”


You’re about 2 months late on my post about this. Went to Waynesboro frequently while living in Savannah, one of the best day lily farms is nearby

Anonymous said...

It is clear that deep-pocketed and vitriolic Socialist Democrats (with perhaps some liberal Republican help) are going to abuse America's judicial system by targeting numerous Republicans with sham charges deriving from our recent fight for honest and accurate elections and speeches related thereto.

As such, I recommend that President [sic] give general (all purpose) pardons to the following groups of people:

Every Republican who signed the Amicus brief in the Texas lawsuit against other states deriving from their violation of Article I, Section 4 (and, perhaps, other) provision [sic] of the United States Constitution.

Every Congressman and Senator who voted to rejected the electoral college vote submissions of Arizona and Pennsylvania.

America cannot simply permit Socialist Democrats to abuse Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association [this is not in the Constitution], United States Constitution [sic] and various federal statutes via their often-used strategy of abusing the judicial process via private organizations they fund or the prosecutorial arm they will soon control.

Thank you for your consideration.

Mo Brooks


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Gun control laws will help save some good people.
While the bill falls short of the sweeping gun control measures Democrats have long demanded, its approval would amount to the most significant action in decades to overhaul the nation’s gun laws. The 64-to-34 vote came just hours after Republicans and Democrats released the text of the legislation, and after days of feverish negotiations to hammer out its details.

Proponents hope to pass it by Saturday, and Democratic leaders put it on a fast track on the normally sluggish Senate floor.

The 80-page bill, called the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, would enhance background checks, giving authorities up to 10 business days to review the juvenile and mental health records of gun purchasers younger than 21, and direct millions toward helping states implement so-called red-flag laws, which allow authorities to temporarily confiscate guns from people deemed dangerous, as well as other intervention programs.

Caliphate4vr said...

LMAO!!!!

Anonymous said...

Cali,great post on poor joe's senile cards

Anonymous said...

Retard said
"Coldheartedtruth TellerJune 23, 2022 at 8:45 PM

Gun control laws will help save some good people.

Nope, zero supportive data.

Emotions of a teen girl.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The seven states with the lowest firearm death rates for 2020 all had red flag laws. And 14 of the 15 states with the highest firearm death rates that year did not have a red flag law. The exception was New Mexico, where a red flag law took effect halfway through the year.

On average, states with red flag laws in 2019 and 2020 had significantly lower firearm death rates than states without them. In 2018, the average death rates for both groups were closer, but states with red flag laws still had a meaningfully lower rate.

Then I imagined those average firearm death rates applied to the whole country – if the whole nation had a red flag law, or there were none at all. In 2020, if there were no red flag laws, I estimate that 52,530 Americans would have died in gun deaths. The number actually recorded was 45,222, indicating red flag laws saved 7,308 American lives that year.

If red flag laws had existed either state by state or at the federal level, my estimate is that 33,780 people would have died by firearms in 2020 – saving an additional 11,442 lives.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://theconversation.com/red-flag-laws-saved-7-300-americans-from-gun-deaths-in-2020-alone-and-could-have-saved-11-400-more-185009

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Senate on Thursday passed legislation aimed at stanching acts of mass gun violence, with 15 Republicans joining Democrats to advance a bill combining modest new firearms restrictions with $15 billion in mental health and school security funding.

The 65-to-33 vote represented an unlikely breakthrough on the emotional and polarizing question of U.S. gun laws, which have gone largely unchanged for more than 25 years, even as the nation has been repeatedly scarred by mass shootings whose names have become etched in history — from Columbine and Virginia Tech to Sandy Hook and Parkland.

But the May 24 killing of 19 students and two teachers inside a Uvalde, Tex., elementary school prompted renewed action, compelling a small group of senators to negotiate a narrow, bipartisan package focused on keeping guns away from dangerous potential killers while also bulking up the nation’s mental-health-care capacity with billions of dollars in new funding.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Biden said in an emailed statement that "after 28 years of inaction, bipartisan members of Congress came together to heed the call of families across the country and passed legislation to address the scourge of gun violence in our communities."

"Families in Uvalde and Buffalo — and too many tragic shootings before — have demanded action.  And tonight, we acted," he added."This bipartisan legislation will help protect Americans. Kids in schools and communities will be safer because of it. The House of Representatives should promptly vote on this bipartisan bill and send it to my desk."

Caliphate4vr said...

Anyhow have a great night πŸŒ™


June 23, 2022 at 6:59 PM


Goodbye cruel world

Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
Gun ……l..

business days to review the juvenile and mental health records of gun purchasers younger than 21, and direct millions toward helping states implement so-called red-flag laws, which allow authorities to temporarily confiscate guns from people deemed dangerous, as well as other intervention programs.

June 23, 2022 at 8:45 PM


Get help

LMAO

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The legislation that was passed this afternoon includes.

The legislation, which provides roughly $15 billion in funding, would help states put in place and enforce extreme risk protection orders, known as red-flag laws, to remove guns from people deemed dangerous; close the so-called boyfriend loophole related to dating partners; and expand background checks to include juvenile and mental health records for buyers under 21 years old. Of the spending, more than half would be used to fund mental-health programs and bolster school safety.

It will be signed by the President next week.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

No more hearings for a couple weeks. But


Those pardon requests could play a central role in future hearings, as the committee attempts to build upon its case that Trump and his allies are directly responsible for the January 6 attack. In his closing statement Thursday, Thompson said the next round of hearings would demonstrate how Trump’s increasingly desperate attempts to stay in office culminated in the deadly insurrection.

“We’re going to show how Donald Trump tapped into the threat of violence,” Thompson said. “How he summoned the mob to Washington and how after corruption and political pressure failed to keep Donald Trump in office, violence became the last option.”


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/23/january-6-hearings-trump-role-recap

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Senate

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...


The Senate on Thursday passed a bipartisan bill to address gun violence that amounts to the first major federal gun safety legislation in decades. The vote was 65 to 33 with 15 Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. The bill now goes to the House for a vote before it can be sent to President Joe Biden to be signed into law. The measure includes millions of dollars for mental health, school safety, crisis intervention programs and incentives for states to bolster juvenile records systems. It also makes significant changes to the process for people ages 18 to 21 to buy a firearm and closes the so-called boyfriend loophole. The package, however, does not include an assault weapons ban that Democrats were seeking. Separately, hours before the Senate vote, the Supreme Court struck down a New York gun law that places restrictions on carrying a concealed handgun outside the home -- an opinion marking the widest expansion of gun rights in a decade.

Myballsinthewoodsagain said...

I assume we all saw the instructions Biden was following, telling him this gs ad simple as to sit down. This should concern us all. To have a US president so diminished in faculties a very real danger to the nation and the world.

James's Fucking Daddy said...


Will Biden demand equal justice for Hunter on the gun laws ?

In other words jail time ?

or do laws only apply to republicans ?

The Russian collusion hoaxers are beaming

as is "the big guy"

whoever that is

as Biden sends out his goon squad to raid Americans directed by the ultra-partisan J6 commission

Banana Republic

Kangaroo Court

no longer America

unequal justice

totalitarian and authoritarian

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Supreme Court will probably change the country today.

Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the case in which the supreme court could overturn abortion rights, is not the only one in which the justices could make a ruling that touches on a contentious issue in American society.

There’s also Kennedy v Bremerton School District, which deals with a football coach’s practice of praying after games and could end up expanding the types of religious activities allowed at public schools. A ruling in that direction would come just days after the court opened the door to religious schools receiving public funds in a decision that liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor warned weakened the separation between church and state.

Then there’s West Virginia v EPA. The justices are considering a plan announced by former president Barack Obama to lower power plants’ emissions — but which never took effect. The fear is that the conservative majority will use the case as an opportunity to take away major regulatory powers from the government.

Finally, there’s a case that doesn’t affect Americans but rather people on its borders. Biden v. Texas represents the sitting president’s attempt to end the “remain in Mexico” policy implemented by his predecessor Donald Trump, which forced many asylum seekers to stay south of the border while their cases were heard.

The supreme court could today release their opinions on all of these, or none, or some combination in between.

James's Fucking Daddy said...


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The supreme court could today release their opinions on all of these, or none, or some combination in between.


very insightful, thanks

thebradfordfile
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1540156021695463424

Biden is the most compromised president in American history. His brain is pudding and the entire world knows it.



entire world other than roger

he's still mindlessly cheering

Caliphate4vr said...

Quick send a few more billion we don’t have

Ukrainian forces ordered to retreat from key city of Severodonetsk

Anonymous said...

Roger , Dennis and James cheered this War Time President.

Sadly ,

Anonymous said...

Yes WE THE PEOPLE
Saw how barely function Joe is.
Sad.
"MyballsinthewoodsagainJune 24, 2022 at 7:24 AM

I assume we all saw the instructions Biden was following, telling him this gs ad simple as to sit down. This should concern us all. To have a US president so diminished in faculties a very real danger to the nation and the world"

Caliphate4vr said...

The White House is refusing to share details about its coordinated efforts to engage in a federal takeover of election administration.

President Biden really does not want the public to know about his federal takeover of election administration. Dozens of members of Congress have repeatedly asked for details, to no avail. Good government groups, members of the media, and private citizens have filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act. Not a single one has been responded to. All signs indicate a concerted effort to keep the public in the dark until at least after the November midterm elections. The lack of transparency and responsiveness is so bad that the Department of Justice and some of its agencies have been repeatedly sued for the information.

When President Biden ordered all 600 federal agencies to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process” on March 7, 2021, Republican politicians, Constitutional scholars, and election integrity specialists began to worry exactly what was up his sleeve.

They had good reason. The 2020 election had suffered from widespread and coordinated efforts by Democrat activists and donors to run “Get Out The Vote” operations from inside state and local government election offices, predominantly in the Democrat-leaning areas of swing states. Independent researchers have shown the effect of this takeover of government election offices was extremely partisan and favored Democrats overwhelmingly.

At the time the order was issued, Democrats were also hoping to pass H.R. 1, a continuation of the effort to destabilize elections throughout the country via a federalized takeover of state election administrations.

Biden gave each agency 200 days to file their plans for approval by none other than Susan Rice, his hyperpartisan domestic policy advisor. Yet fully nine months after those plans were due, they are all being hidden from the public, even as evidence is emerging that the election operation is in full swing.

Mobilizing Voters Is Always A Political Act

There are several major problems with Biden’s secret plan, critics say. It’s unethical to tie federal benefits to election activity. It’s unconstitutional to have the federal government take authority that belongs to the states and which Congress has not granted. And, given that all 50 states have different laws and processes governing election administration, it’s a recipe for chaos, confusion, and fraud at a time when election security concerns are particularly fraught.

Mobilizing voters is always a political act. Choosing which groups to target for Get Out The Vote efforts is one of the most important activities done by political campaigns. Federal agencies that interact with the public by doling out benefits can easily pressure recipients to vote for particular candidates and positions. Congress passed the Hatch Act in 1939, which bans bureaucrats and bureaucracies from being involved in election activities after Democrats used Works Progress Administration programs and personnel for partisan political advantage.

Executive Order 14019 ignores that the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over elections. That power is reserved for the states, with a smaller role for Congress. With H.R. 1 and other Democrat Party efforts to grab more control over elections have thus far failed, Congress hasn’t authorized such an expansion.


Rest at link.

Anonymous said...

Rowe over ruled

Anonymous said...

A great day in America

Caliphate4vr said...

Wow

Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion
By Amy Howe
on Jun 24, 2022 at 10:13 am

Anonymous said...

WE THE PEOPLE
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ WIN THANKS TO TRUMP πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,Yes,

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending 50 years of federal abortion rights
PUBLISHED FRI, JUN 24 202210:11 AM EDTUPDATED 1 MIN AGO
thumbnail
Dan Mangan
@_DANMANGAN
Kevin Breuninger
@KEVINWILLIAMB
Roe v. Wade had permitted abortions during the first two trimesters of pregnancy in the U.S. since 1973.
Almost half the states are expected to outlaw or severely restrict abortion as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision.
Roe was overturned in the court’s ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Pro life protestors march in front of the Supreme Court building amid the ruling that could overturn Roe v. Wade on June 13, 2022 in Washington, DC.
Pro life protestors march in front of the Supreme Court building amid the ruling that could overturn Roe v. Wade on June 13, 2022 in Washington, DC.
Roberto Schmidt | AFP | Getty Images
The Supreme Court on Friday overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established the constitutional right to abortion in the U.S. in 1973.

Anonymous said...

Cali, will the left lose thier minds?

Anonymous said...

Roger, two of us already told this blog.

You are always such a loser.

Anonymous said...

Jane's Revenge promised riots.

Caliphate4vr said...

I’m not a pro-lifer nor abortion legal until birth.

GA goes to 6 weeks, it should probably be 12…

But Roe was bad law from day one