Here is your new Jan 6th thread - so stop spamming the other threads!
Let’s admit it: The Jan. 6 committee isn’t uncovering anything newDespite breathless previews of coming attractions, little has changed since the hearings began beyond what was already established: By insisting against all credible evidence that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent, President Donald Trump incited the Capitol riot, dangerously directed his anger toward his own vice president and, most damning of all, refused to participate in the peaceful transfer of power on Jan. 20, 2021.
But the effort to connect Trump to some grand conspiracy involving a shadowy network of fanatical backyard warriors and armchair militants is a bridge too far. It risks making him seem a victim of this overzealous and partisan committee, as evidenced by a new New York Times/Siena College poll showing Trump in a virtual dead heat with President Biden in a hypothetical 2024 rematch — a reality check in the midst of these “bombshell” hearings.
The effort to link Trump to the actions of militant groups, such as the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, continues to fall flat. On Tuesday, the committee failed to demonstrate any direct coordination beyond the delusions of the militia members and right-wing media personalities. Likewise, the video testimony of former White House counsel Pat Cipollone provided nothing new; it has long been known that he quickly accepted the election results and tried to persuade Trump to do the same.
The case against Trump is often focused on “things Trump almost did,” such as ordering the seizure of voting machines or appointing Sidney Powell as a special counsel. The committee also enjoys presenting salacious tidbits of information for the purposes of titillation. In the last hearing, it was a tale — later contested — of Trump grabbing a steering wheel and lunging for a person’s throat while demanding to be taken to the Capitol. On Tuesday, it was a Dec. 18 White House meeting featuring a screaming match and a near-physical altercation over how far to go to contest the election. Lots of sound and fury in both cases, but in the end they signify nothing.
The funny thing is how true the statement about things "Trump almost did" being such a main focus for this committee. But to be honest, it has been the focus of anti-Trumpers from day one. Nothing really too new there. Generally you have seen this from someone demanding that they heroically prevented Trump from doing any number of things that were never actually done or someone who states that he was "just about do this one thing" before changing his mind.
One might think that of the 1001 times that someone had to "stop" Trump from doing the unthinkable or that Trump "almost" did something horrible... that there might be at least one or two times that he "actually" did those things. But alas... he never quite "does" the monstrous stuff that the left would like to accuse him of doing.
I also heard that Cheney has suggested that in the wake of the Hutchinson testimony that they have more people coming forward who have similar "stories". Ironically the entire problem with the Hutchinson testimony is that it was simply a "story" and an unverified story at that. I think that there is a limit to what people will put up with in terms of allowing people to get on a witness stand and tell stories that they were not first hand witnesses of. One was more than enough.
Either way, this opinion piece from the Washington Post strongly suggests that even liberals are getting tired of the bark but no bite Jan 6th commission. Perhaps they expected more and are horribly horribly disappointed. Perhaps they understood that it would be a flop, and just waited till the time was right to criticize it. But more and more liberals are turning their back on this sham of a process, understanding that it is doing literally nothing to help Democrats, much less the Country as a whole.
Won't stop the true crazies from getting all up in arms over this...
But there is no fixing stupid!
211 comments:
1 – 200 of 211 Newer› Newest»Still no release of the complete video evidence
Still no detail on the FBI involvement beyond court admittances
Still no investigation on those responsible for security, ultimately Pelosi
Still no release of complete transcripts of their interviews
Still a one-sided show trial
worse than the McCarthy hearings though those had much higher ratings
* though they are exposing democrats and anti-Trumpers for what they are
and Trump will likely have a complete rebound from his "damaged" reputation when Republicans can fire back and do a real investigation
and many precedents are being set...
Scott its just an opinion by a life long Republican.
Contributing columnist
Gary Abernathy, a contributing columnist for The Post, is a freelance writer based in the Cincinnati, Ohio, region. After spending 13 years as an editor at three Ohio newspapers from 1983 to 1996, Abernathy worked in Republican Party politics in Ohio and West Virginia, as well as for an Ohio congressman and two U.S. senators. He returned to journalism in 2011, serving until July 2018 as publisher and editor of the (Hillsboro, Ohio) Times-Gazette, one of the few newspapers to endorse Donald Trump for president in 2016. Abernathy has served as an on-air election analyst for the PBS NewsHour, alo
The bottom line is you really have been brainwashed
It was Donald Trump, and Donald Trump alone, who summoned and loosed the mob that sacked the Capitol, threatened Congress and the vice president and imperiled our democracy. That is the powerful message that emerged from Tuesday’s televised hearing of the Jan. 6 select committee. And these hearings make clear just how dangerous it would be for the former president to be elected again.
Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates
Amazingly enough, this wasn’t the plan advanced by Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Flynn and the rest of Trump’s “Team Crazy” advisers. The page from the authoritarian playbook they chose was sedate by comparison: Nullify the 2020 election by sending troops to impound the voting machines. And it certainly wasn’t the course advocated by Trump’s “Team Normal,” including then-White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, who urged Trump to acknowledge the truth: that he had lost the election to Joe Biden.
On the night of Dec. 18, 2020, witnesses told the committee, Trump presided over a rancorous, hours-long screaming match between the Crazy and Normal camps that ended after midnight with no real resolution. At 1:42 a.m. that night, Trump embarked on a third, radically different course of action: He posted the infamous tweet telling supporters to come to Washington on Jan. 6, ending it with what MAGA extremists understood as a call to arms: “Be there, will be wild!”
Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Flyn and Donald Trump tried to overturn the election results staring on election night ๐
Eugene Robinson writes a twice-a-week column on politics and culture and hosts a weekly online chat with readers. In a three-decade career at The Washington Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the paper’s Style section. He started writing a column for the Op-Ed page in 2005. In 2009, he received the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary for “his eloquent columns on the 2008 presidential campaign that focus on the election of the first African-American president, showcasing graceful writing and grasp of the larger historic picture.”
Robinson is a virulent racist, scumbag, and an all-around piece of shit.
And winning a P-U-litzer from their cute little mutual admiration society is no accomplishment.
You really said that he was a liberals are turning their back on this sham of a process,
Contributing columnist
Gary Abernathy endorse Donald Trump for president in 2016. Abernathy has served as an on-air election analyst for the PBS NewsHour.
The liberal Washington Post allows people like him to speak what he thinks about
Despite "polling" that might say something different - the television ratings suggests that about 6% of the American population have tuned into these hearings...
SIX PERCENT!
To put this in perspective?
The Watergate hearing were watched by 75% of the American public!
Donald Trump famously joked that he was so popular with his fans that he could literally get away with murder.
“I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters, he bragged while campaigning in Iowa back in 2016.
Advertisement
January 6 could have beeneven worse. We can’t allow a rerun in 2024 | Lloyd Green
Never mind the voters. Here we are, 18 months after his presidency, staring at clear evidence that Trump led a criminal conspiracy to interfere with the 2020 election and the constitutional duties of Congress. He intentionally incited a violent mob that he knew was armed to mount an attempted coup on Capitol Hill.
He knew from his own lawyers’ opposition to his many crackpot schemes that he was breaking the law.
Republicans are turning off.
You can't
SIX PERCENT!
The TDS is STRONG with the alky these days.
And the fear is palpable. He's so desperate to destroy the Bad Orange Man. Completely irrational. And he seems to think that generating an alky-lanche of plagiarized opinions makes his case.
Roger....
Why did 75% of Americans watch the Watergate hearings?
Versus 6% watching the Jan 6th Hearings?
You know... since Jan 6th was worse than 9-11.
How do you reconcile that with the idea that everyone who is not watching are the ones who are crazy people who need to be locked up like you are?
In 1974 we had two networks and public broadcasting.
You were 11 years old
I was 23 and we had two tell stations in Rapid City Kota and Krsd
I knew the woman who owned KOTA. Helen Duhamel. She was a brilliant woman.
We don't know yet about the impact on the people yet.
Not uncovering anything new?
True, we already knew Trump was guilty of sedition, but that is becoming ever more and more firmly established.
When Trump goes on trial, what percentage of the American people do you think will watch that?
I'm sorry for you but I'm free to come and go 24/7
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
I'm sorry for you but I'm free to come and go 24/7
Yet you're here 20/7.
True, we already knew Trump was guilty of sedition
We... as in you and Roger?
Because I rely on the expertise of real legal scholars. None of them see Garland charging Trump with any sort of incitement or sedition or believe he can be held liable for the riot. Even if he was charged, there are USSC precedents that would 99% likely get any conviction like that tossed.
There is one of the scholars "I" follow (who I follow because they are right 90% of the time) who believes that a charge regarding the obstruction (attempts to prevent the counting of the ballots) is "possible" but unlikely. That "still" goes to proving that Trump "believed" he lost the election fairly.
In wake of him actually being RIGHT in Wisconsin...
With still looming legal questions in Georgia...
and a possible legislative decertification in Arizona...
That is a hard argument to make, now isn't it?
Much less "prove" in court.
He even lost your favorite writer on the January 6th committee investigating Trump
Following another slew of incendiary public revelations by the Jan. 6 committee, Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley told viewers that the revelations were “breathtaking” and “disturbing.” All of these details should disturb everyone,” Turley added.
The committee referred Trump to the Justice Department for witness tampering
Perhaps the most stunning moment happened at the very end of the hearing. Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) said in her closing statement that the former president had tried to contact a committee witness.
Scott witnesses tampering is very easy to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
If he had his lawyer stopped her from testifying, to avoid getting disbarred, he could testify that he directed him to break the law. It would not be difficult to convince 12 jurors.
It is not like sedition
But under Federal law he would spend his life in jail.
His biggest concern is Georgia.
Scott witnesses tampering is very easy to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right now they have a suggestion that he called a witness who didn't answer?
Where is that on the list of "easy to prove beyond a reasonable doubt" ?
Didn't find ratings for yesterday but found this nugget:
"Prime-time cable-news viewership was down 19% for the first half of this year compared to the first half of 2021. CNN and MSNBC were down 47% and 33%, respectively. Fox News was up 12%."
https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-am-18ddfe39-087e-4b74-a300-be553fffdddb.html
2 of those stations have been fixated on Jan 6th
1 not
see if you can guess which one wasn't and how it did versus the ones who did...
People's eyeballs are a poll too...
I see roger fucked up the blog AGAIN
guess he has one talent
Roger,
Perhaps you can find where Turley suggests that Trump is going to be charged with sedition or incitement?
https://twitter.com/JonathanTurley
https://jonathanturley.org/
An Ohio man has been charged in the rape of a 10-year-old girl who had to travel to Indiana to undergo an abortion, a case that’s been decried by President Biden in the days since the story garnered international attention.
Some examples of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 witness intimidation include the following:
Offering a bribe to a witness - nope
Making threats to a witness or their family with physical harm or property damage -nope
Using or attempted use of physical violence to cause injury or kill a witness - nope
Asking a witness to not provide testimony, or to testify in a specific way - nope
Asking a witness to lie, or to not report a crime or cooperate with law enforcement -nope
Preventing a witness from attending a court hearing, or any legal proceeding. - nope
Guess roger just got Trump off !!!
case dimsissed
THANKS!!!
No and that hypocrisy is happening every time. Even when people think that he was wrong, they will still vote for him
any legal proceeding.
Th house is investigating it. It is a legal proceeding.
Trump will not be found guilty for things "he almost did," but for what he attempted to do:
He attempted in every way he could muster to overthrow the last presidential election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power, and thus he was trying to obstruct the will of the American people, a criminal act.
At his inauguration he swore to uphold and defend the Constitution. But in attempting to overthrow the last presidential election he was trying in every way he could to subvert the very Constitution he had sworn to defend, and he encouraged and even sent others whom he knew to be armed to subvert the democratic process by which our leaders are chosen.
In doing that he was fomenting armed rebellion against the will of the people of the United States of America.
Asking a witness to lie, or to not report a crime or cooperate with law enforcement
Asking a witness not to cooperate with law enforcement!!!
dems should be shaking in their boots
That's half of their elected officials
We are going to need a bigger jailhouse
maybe repurpose Congress ?
Nancy can be the cell spokesperson
I see the POS "pastor" is back
and lying
he never gets tired of that
He must even lie in his sleep
He attempted in every way he could muster to overthrow the last presidential election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power, and thus he was trying to obstruct the will of the American people, a criminal act.
Well then, Reverend....
I guess you know better!
What with your extensive legal background. Where did you get your Juris Doctor degree from again? Princeton or Yale? I seem to have forgotten?
Politics · Trending
#BidenIsALaughingstock
11.4K Tweets.
got to go check this out before twitter catches on
maybe it was a couple of things
he's keeping their censors real busy
Lmao ๐คฃ
Skip to main content
.
“One of the Most Serious Allegations”
In interviews with Law&Crime, former federal prosecutors interpreted the announcement as Cheney’s shot .”
Witness tampering is a federal crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison. The statute, 18 U.S. Code § 1512, reads as follows:
Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding;
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
๐บ๐ธ Lowkey Rey 2.0 ๐บ๐ธ
@AtlRey
·
Let's compare inflation rates.
China: 2.1%
Russia: 4.47% with sanctions
USA: 9.1%
COOP3R
@JUST_COOP3R
Why is #BidenIsALaughingstock trending today?
He's been a laughing stock for decades.
Sam Colt 45
@SamColt45NH
The most incompetent administration in our lifetime. #BidenIsALaughingstock #BidenDestroysAmerica #Biden #BidenIsAFailure #BidenCrimeFamilly
looks like just a bunch of regular posts
Twitter must be in a meeting and missed censoring
He censored me about this
https://lawandcrime.com/jan-6-committee/legal-experts-react-to-jan-6-committees-decision-to-tell-federal-prosecutors-about-donald-trumps-phone-call-to-a-witness/
Russia's Economy is booming because they Sell Oil/ Gas.
The world needs thier products.
Witness tampering is a federal crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison. The statute, 18 U.S. Code § 1512, reads as follows:
Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding;
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Many Jan. 6 defendants have been charged under a different section of the same statute that analogously prohibits interfering with an official proceeding.
“Does Not Exonerate Him”
During the Russia investigation, Trump’s attacks and contacts with witnesses filled the pages of then-special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. Mueller found that, on multiple occasions, Trump’s conduct met all three prongs of the statute, but the special counsel declined to accuse the former president of committing a crime, citing Justice Department guidance against indicting a then-sitting president.
That guidance spurred Mueller to end his tome by noting “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Attorney General Merrick Garland has not charged Trump with that conduct, now that the 45th president is out of office. Experts have wrangled over when the five-year statute of limitations on the statute expires, based on the specific allegations of the report.
“All of the things that are referenced in the Mueller investigation that took place in 2016 has passed,” Epner noted.
Asked whether Trump may have felt emboldened by the Justice Department declining to prosecute him on witness tampering allegations to date, Epner quipped: “I’m smart enough to know that I cannot plumb the mind of Donald Trump.”
Trump’s attorney Alina Habba did not immediately respond to Law&Crime’s press inquiry. The Justice Department declined to comment on the Committee’s revelation.
In 1974 we had two networks and public broadcasting.
So who wast around, ABC, CBS or NBC and BTW little old atlanta had Turner Broadcasting since 1965
Shut up
๐บ๐ธMARK๐บ๐ธ#FJB ๐บ๐ธULTRA MAGA๐บ๐ธ
Here's one relating to Jan 6th:
https://twitter.com/Msajr4/status/1546152415304597504
Hey Liberals, do you still think your boy @JoeBiden is doing a good job?
#BidenIsALaughingstock
I doubt roger can remember that far back
Remember when The US was Energy Independent, way back during the Trump years.
*wasn't
Lol@ Biden.
"#BidenIsALaughingstock
Roger is so spectacularly wrong on everything and everytime.
Julie Kelly ๐บ๐ธ
VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1547331951379550213
Her husband is the DC US Attorney prosecuting 850+ Trump supporters related to January 6 and who indicted Bannon and Navarro for contempt of Congress.
She's a far-left radical activist with a history of derogatory comments about Trump and his voters.
Quote Tweet
Daily Wire
@realDailyWire
President of National Women's Law Center cannot define the word "woman" during congressional hearing
Washington DC and its activist judges and jurists are destroying America
We need juries of our peers and a blind justice system
and not show trials
I provided the correct information. Put down the PBR
The witness who has not yet appeared whom Trump tried to persuade (tamper with) to testify as he wanted him or her to testify, will instead testify that Trump KNEW and ADMITTED to him or her that his push to contest the 2020 results and have Pence reject Joe Biden's victory was baseless and thus illegal.
He or she will testify that Trump knew this and actually SAID it to him or her, and if he or she has proof corroborating that this actually happened (an indisputable voice recording of, or writing from, Trump), Trump's goose will be cooked.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green
Did the Jan 6th committee show this ?
VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1547307533475450882
Who again planned and instigated the storming of the Capitol?
Quote Tweet
Ron Filipkowski ๐บ๐ฆ
@RonFilipkowski
After Trump, Ted Cruz, Thomas Massie, Marge Greene, Matt Gaetz and countless others falsely accused Ray Epps of being an FBI informant who instigated the storming of the Capitol, he has lost his business and home, and is planning to sue for defamation. https://nytimes.com/2022/07/13/us/politics/jan-6-conspiracy-theory-ray-epps.html
P e d o Pete Biden
"Ohio 10-year-old's alleged rapist is Guatemalan illegal immigrant: ICE sourceGerson Fuentes is accused of raping a 10-year-old Ohio girl, who later got an abortion"
I wonder why the committee hasn't demanded the release of all video to the public
odd what you find in bits and pieces
would be instrumental in seeing what actually occurred in a straight timeline
Along with what Trump was actually doing those exact same moments
If they were searching for the truth
but the truth will be coming
America hopes
and it will likely kill the democrat party
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/13/jan-6-panel-justice-department-false-trump-electors-00045611
Trying to set up fake electors is a HUGE crime.
Anonymous said...
P e d o Pete Biden
"Ohio 10-year-old's alleged rapist is Guatemalan illegal immigrant: ICE sourceGerson Fuentes is accused of raping a 10-year-old Ohio girl
I think roger left off quite a bit of this story
I imagine it's going to quickly dissappear
It’s the first time a member of the committee has publicly indicated the focus of their talks with the Justice Department. Thompson’s comments suggest the department is continuing to advance its examination of the false-elector scheme, a key element of former President Donald Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election and seize a second term he didn’t win. And it shows the panel’s advancing engagement with the Justice Department as prosecutors pursue their own parallel criminal probe of Trump-linked efforts to overturn the election.
The Justice Department first issued a blanket request in April for the select committee’s transcripts of its interviews with over 1,000 witnesses, but the committee rejected it. The department subsequently agreed to postpone a landmark criminal trial of leaders of the Proud Boys, citing the uncertainty around the committee’s transcripts and the publicity caused by the panel’s public hearings. Thompson told reporters that he anticipates releasing all of their information publicly in the fall.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/13/jan-6-panel-justice-department-false-trump-electors-00045611
DisHonest, indecent, untruthful and ignorant Rev. said...
Trying to set up fake electors is a HUGE crime.
Putting forth alternate electors is totally legal
maybe if you are ignorant you don't understand this
it's already been explained to you
beyond your ability to comprehend ?
It’s the first time a member of the committee has publicly indicated the focus of their talks with the Justice Department. Thompson’s comments suggest the department is continuing to advance its examination of the false-elector scheme, a key element of former President Donald Trump’s effort to subvert the 2020 election and seize a second term he didn’t win. And it shows the panel’s advancing engagement with the Justice Department as prosecutors pursue their own parallel criminal probe of Trump-linked efforts to overturn the election.
The Justice Department first issued a blanket request in April for the select committee’s transcripts of its interviews with over 1,000 witnesses, but the committee rejected it. The department subsequently agreed to postpone a landmark criminal trial of leaders of the Proud Boys, citing the uncertainty around the committee’s transcripts and the publicity caused by the panel’s public hearings. Thompson told reporters that he anticipates releasing all of their information publicly in the fall.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/13/jan-6-panel-justice-department-false-trump-electors-00045611
52 U.S. Code § 20511 - Criminal penalties
U.S. CodeNotes
prev next
A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office—
(1)knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for—
(A)
registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;
(B)
urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or
(C)
exercising any right under this chapter; or
(2)knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by—
(A)
the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or
(B)
the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held,
shall be fined in accordance with title 18 (which fines shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury, miscellaneous receipts (pursuant to section 3302 of title 31), notwithstanding any other law), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
Skyrocketing inflation forces shoppers to work overtime and change diets as prices soar"
Prices of fuel , seed and fertilizer are way up and have yet to hit the economy.
Trump-linked efforts to overturn the election.
If trying to find the truth about the many shenanigans is going to overturn the election you know what that means
Biden is an illegitimate president
and Americans are realizing that
Thanks
any mor on that child rapist ?
(not the Bidens but the one you posted earlier about)
Benny Johnson
VIDEO:
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1547218502108463104
Biden lands in Israel and immediately says he is there to “keep alive the honor of the Holocaust.”
Then butchers the name of the Jerusalem Holocaust museum Yad Vashem.
Great start.
too legit to quit
besides Kamala is number 2 (and a number 2)
Nancy 3 until Jan
but boy will it change then
So Roger...
You mean this?
Exactly what I stated:
“This was merely a warning to Trump by Cheney, to dissuade him from trying to tamper with witnesses,” Renato Mariotti, an ex-prosecutor and frequent legal analyst, said. “A phone call that didn’t go through, on its own, is not a sufficient basis for a witness tampering charge.”
https://lawandcrime.com/jan-6-committee/legal-experts-react-to-jan-6-committees-decision-to-tell-federal-prosecutors-about-donald-trumps-phone-call-to-a-witness/
I think we would actually "know" if there was a real witness tampering issue and it would not be reports of phone calls that were not answered.
Liz Cheney just knows that some people are very stupid.
In fact she counts on it!
She knows that smart people who got good grades and went to college will not fall for it. But perhaps dumb people who were C+ students who could not hack college... just might be dumb enough!!!
Anonymous James's Fucking Daddy said...
Anonymous said...
P e d o Pete Biden
"Ohio 10-year-old's alleged rapist is Guatemalan illegal immigrant: ICE sourceGerson Fuentes is accused of raping a 10-year-old Ohio girl
I think roger left off quite a bit of this story
I imagine it's going to quickly dissappear
And the “doc” violated HIPAA
Child protective services obviously didn’t relay this to police
So much weirdness involved in this story
A spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment.
For weeks, the Justice Department has been negotiating with the Jan. 6 panel about turning over transcripts of its interviews to federal prosecutors. The agency has asked the committee for copies of every transcript of each of its more than 1,000 interviews, while the committee has pushed back, requesting that the department narrow its request.
Mr. Thompson’s comments Wednesday were the clearest indication yet of what the Justice Department is looking for.
“We’re in the process of negotiating how that information will be viewed,” Mr. Thompson said, adding that he believed Justice Department officials would make an appointment with the committee to review the transcripts in person. “We’re engaging.”
The Justice Department has been investigating the scheme to put forward fake electors for months and has issued subpoenas to top Trump lawyers who worked on the plan.
This is another possible crime that would prevent him from being elected President again.
Politico and The New York Times reported
A recording of the phone call is admissible. They didn't mention that
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/us/politics/jan-6-committee-evidence-justice-department.html
Just 30 minutes ago
Jan. 6 Panel Will Turn Over Evidence on Fake Electors to the Justice Dept.
The department has asked the House committee investigating the Capitol attack to share transcripts regarding the false electors scheme, the only topic it has broached with the panel.
Sandy Cortez Calls Climate Change 'Our World War II'"The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don't address climate change "
Only 9 years left.
A recording of the phone call is admissible. They didn't mention that
The phone call didn't happen Roger.
There is a person who claims that Trump called him, but they did not answer the call from him or talk to him....
What could be recorded from a non-call?
Are you sure you are not locked down in a mental institution? Sure seems like you are struggling to keep up.
ICE source:
"Ohio 10-year-old's alleged rapist is Guatemalan illegal immigrant
Gerson Fuentes is accused of raping a 10-year-old Ohio girl
I think roger left off quite a bit of this story
I imagine it's going to quickly disappear.
Trump was right again! This time on his first ride down the elevator way back when he announced his candidacy.
When you fling open the southern border you are rewarded with murderers, RAPISTS, drug dealers, and violent fucking SCUM. -
The phony elector scheme is now looking more each day like—wait for it—Trump’s Watergate. .
At the end of Tuesday’s hearing before the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) revealed that former President Donald Trump had directly reached out to a witness in the investigation .
We will see what happens. You posted an opinion. We don't know if she picked it up or not yet!
The 142 IQ is driving you crazy
We will see what happens. You posted an opinion. We don't know if she picked it up or not yet!
Actually we do know Roger.
Said they didn't answer it.
Thus the opinion of the "EXPERT YOU CITED" -
“This was merely a warning to Trump by Cheney, to dissuade him from trying to tamper with witnesses,” Renato Mariotti, an ex-prosecutor and frequent legal analyst, said. “A phone call that didn’t go through, on its own, is not a sufficient basis for a witness tampering charge.”
The New York Times reported that despite the fact that he or she didn't answer the phone calls..
“But if the former president was trying to interfere with a witness, that would be, obviously, a very serious allegation,” said Mr. Romney, who voted last year to convict Mr. Trump on the impeachment charge of incitement of insurrection and remove him after the Jan. 6 attack.
The committee’s focus on potential witness tampering by Mr. Trump appears to be an effort to prod the Justice Department to investigate the former president for potential crimes. At each of its recent hearings, the panel has presented evidence that its members believe could be used to bolster criminal charges against Mr. Trump. The committee has provided details, including about the fake electors, that could be grounds for charges of conspiracy to defraud the American people, falsifying documents and obstructing an official proceeding of Congress.
Witness tampering would be yet another avenue for prosecuting the former president. Mr. Trump has a long history of making statements or taking actions that can be read as efforts to interfere with ongoing investigations targeting him.
The 142 IQ is driving you crazy
I think the fact that I am educated, work in a high tech job, make good money and am married to a former model upsets you.
I don't brag about my "IQ" because it is an unequal and sometimes arbitrary measurement. I have been tested at genius level by a "Mensa" test - but never wanted to actually join. I just wanted to take the test.
Because... in spite of having multiple IQ tests were I scored through the roof, I don't "really" believe I am a genius. Geniuses are actually very rare. Only one or two in every thousand people.
My autistic son is smarter than anyone on this forum... and was nicknamed the "autistic genius" in high school. Things come scarily easy for him.
His literal IQ test that was through a psychologist was 120 (ranking him in the top 3% of the population). The testing took more than one session and included more than just a written exam.
I know you are nowhere near as smart as him.
So to pretend that you are two standard deviations smarter than him (which would put you in the top 99.9995% of the population (which is where a real 142 IQ level would put you)... Is a joke.
The fact you actually "believe it"... is amazing.
A phone call that didn’t go through, on its own, is not a sufficient basis for a witness tampering charge.”
But that doesn't mean that they can't charge him yet.
130 to 144: Moderately gifted
Not the top one percent like you said
I'm in the top ten percent.
Einstein etc 160+
Mildly gifted: 115 to 129; Moderately gifted: 130 to 144; ighly gifted: 145 to 159; Exceptionally gifted: 160 +.
I fucked up
Iq testing doesn't check knowledge about things but problem solving.
No Roger..
This is generally accepted as the most "lenient" measure.
Where standard deviations are every 15 points (my son was measured with standard deviation being every 10 points).
https://www.iq-test.cc/resource/iq_measure_average_and_high_iq
In this case approximately 70% of the population is between 85-115 (or 90-110 depending).
The next standard deviation brings you either to 130 or 120 (which is where my son was - two standard deviations above average) - that is top 2%
145 or 130 puts you in the 0.1% range.
And one more time is your irrational diatribes for.
According to Cheney, Trump tried to call the unnamed witness after the committee’s sixth hearing last month. The witness, who has not yet been publicly revealed as a participant in the committee’s investigation, declined the call.
Instead, the witness informed their lawyer about Trump’s attempt to contact them. The lawyer then informed the January 6 committee about the call, and investigators passed the information along to the justice department.
“Let me say one more time: we will take any efforts to influence witness testimony very seriously,” Cheney said.
If the justice department gathers evidence indicating that Trump was attempting to influence witness testimony in the January 6 investigation, prosecutors could pursue criminal charges against the former president.
The only reason why my son did not score higher is that he struggled with rote skills such as spelling or memorizing sets of numbers.
Anything that didn't "challenge him" was lower in the quadrants then the higher level quadrants. He was pure genius at things like spacial reasoning and other logical functions.
The witness, who has not yet been publicly revealed as a participant in the committee’s investigation, declined the call.
Well there you go Roger...
Admitting I was right...
again!
The counselor said that I could get into the greatest colleges like MIT and Harvard if I studied hard enough and graduate in the top ten percent of them
I am gifted but I fucked up most of my life..
I have learned to accept it and sleep well ๐ด
Just one more thing is that if you watch The Good Doctor about the autistic surgeon..
I can imagine in my mind three dimensional images. Almost autistic..
Your son can probably do it too.
spelling or memorizing sets of numbers is very easy for me.
Instead, the witness informed their lawyer about Trump’s attempt to contact them. The lawyer then informed the January 6 committee about the call, and investigators passed the information along to the justice department.
The DOJ can investigate ๐
I could have scored in the top ten percent of the top ten percent.
Like you said.
145 or 130 puts you in the 0.1% range
If I had become an engineer or some medical care provider
I would not be here ๐
Exactly correct
spacial reasoning and other logical functions.
Spacial reasoning made it easy to understand structures. Most of the time in construction I read the blue prints and did the layout easily
Alky you’re a legend in your own mind
Not another fucking sole on this planet believes anything you say
You’re in a mental hospital, prevented from using metal cutlery, having someone else cit nanners for you
STFU
You are a broken down, drunk carpenter who rarely ever sees his daughter
I was hanging with my kids this past weekend and will again this weekend, I am actually allowed outside without supervision or someone needing to sign me out of MY OWN HOUSE
The House Select Committee Investigating the Jan. 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol is considering another round of hearings during the August Recess.
Because they think that they have direct links to the Proud Boys etc and they need the time ⏲️
I am actually allowed outside without supervision or someone needing to sign me out of my room and building.
The House panel investigating the Capitol riot has yet to find a proverbial smoking gun directly connecting the former president to the extremist groups that led the storming of the building.
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
The counselor said that I could get into the greatest colleges like MIT and Harvard if I studied hard enough and graduate in the top ten percent of them
A counselor won’t cut it, you need a team
"Not another fucking sole on this planet believes anything you say."
Cali, you mean you don't believe alky almost was a submarine crew Chief,
Or
Almost bought a Built to his specs at Mary's Lake Washington
Or
Almost Bought a Audi A8
Or
Almost married a ex model on May 9th of this year
Or
......
.....
Heads UP, beef will be even more expensive as Feed Lot managers reduce Cattle In Feed aka COF..
"The total number of cattle placed in feedlots is 1.81 million head, down 1% from last year.May 24, 2022"
Roger...
You had a C+ average and 1600 our 2400 SAT score.
Any guidance counselor who believes you could have gotten into MIT or Harvard is either dumber than a box of rocks or openly mocking you!
MIT and Harvard do not accept dumb people saying they have a high IQ.
Because they think that they have direct links to the Proud Boys etc and they need the time
Because they want to draw this out to be as close to the midterms as they can... even though the entire thing is a bust.
Here is my question for Roger...
I took all the college prep courses during high school. Calculus, advanced Chem, Composition, Biology, etc...
Lettered in three sports... pretty much never "studied" and almost never worked outside of school on any homework (as I could get it all done during study hall).
So without any real "effort" at all... I was an honor roll student who scored over the 90th percentile in the SAT.
Why did it not take effort for me to do what it would have taken effort for you to achieve... if you are so smart? You should have been able to coast to at least a B+ average if you were like me.
Woody Allen on the January 6th clown Show.
"It's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham."
C.H. Truth said...
Roger...
You had a C+ average and 1600 our 2400 SAT score.
Any guidance counselor who believes you could have gotten into MIT or Harvard is either dumber than a box of rocks or openly mocking you!
MIT and Harvard do not accept dumb people saying they have a high IQ.
I think roger would have got in if they hadn't declined the call
so that destroys your argument
roger outwitted you again
now maybe he can sleep tonight
Last year, as an alternative to the temporary expansion of the child tax credit under President Biden’s American Rescue Plan, Senator Mitt Romney of Utah introduced a plan to give every family a monthly benefit of up to $350 per child for children 5 and under and $250 per child for children 6 to 17. It was simple, generous (it included a payment before birth, too) and — on paper, at least — effective. According to the Niskanen Center, which helped devise the proposal, the Romney plan would cut overall child poverty by roughly a third and the deepest child poverty by half.
Republicans hated it. His Senate colleagues Marco Rubio and Mike Lee denounced Romney’s plan as “welfare assistance,” and called for “pro-work” policies to assist families. “An essential part of being pro-family is being pro-work,” the senators said. “Congress should expand the child tax credit without undercutting the responsibility of parents to work to provide for their families.”
Romney, who voted against Biden’s rescue package, went back to the drawing board and recently unveiled a less generous version of his plan aimed at winning Republican support in the Senate. In this iteration, which would fill the gap left by the expiration of the Biden expansion in December, a family with children would have to earn at least $10,000 per year to qualify for the full credit. Below that, the benefit would scale proportionally so that a family earning $5,000 per year would receive 50 percent of the credit. The most impoverished families would receive the smallest benefits.
This version of the child benefit, to use the lingo of Romney’s earlier conservative critics, would “reward work.”
And yet there’s little indication that any more than a token group of Republican lawmakers is interested in Romney’s latest proposal. There’s no appetite for it. For the vast majority of Republicans in Congress, passing a new child benefit is not the kind of work they came to Washington to do. (It should be said, though, that in the absence of the filibuster, that token group of Republicans plus most Democrats would be enough to pass the Romney bill or something like it.)
The hostile and then indifferent response to Romney’s child allowance from his Republican colleagues — as well as the nearly total absence of meaningfully pro-family legislation from conservative lawmakers — tells us something very important about the future of the pro-life cause in the Republican Party. But maybe not quite what you think.
In the weeks since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, some conservatives and abortion opponents have, as Elaine Godfrey reported in The Atlantic, expressed the hope that their movement and political party would turn their attention to the material well-being of mothers, families and children. So far, that hope seems to be misplaced.
Free, now, to pursue whatever policies they’d like on abortion, most Republican lawmakers and anti-abortion activists appear to be focused on passing harsh new restrictions on reproductive autonomy and creating broad protections for “fetal life.”
Trigger laws and prior statutes have already made abortion illegal in roughly a dozen states. Legislators in Missouri and Texas want to pass laws that would extend their bans across state lines, to punish residents who go to other states to obtain abortions. South Carolina Republicans, likewise, have drafted legislation that would ban all abortions except to prevent the death of the mother and would prosecute anyone “conspiring to cause, or aiding or abetting, illegal abortion.” And an Ohio bill would recognize the “personhood” and constitutional rights of “all unborn human individuals from the moment of conception.”
What you won’t find passing anytime soon in any Republican-led state legislature are bills to reduce the cost of childbearing and child-rearing. At most, a few states that have or will ban abortion have extended postpartum care under Medicaid. But there are no major plans to improve coverage or provide new benefits. As a practical matter, the pro-welfare, anti-abortion politician does not exist, at least not in the Republican Party.
The policy correlation is, in fact, what you would expect it to be. As a rule, the states with the most generous safety nets and anti-poverty programs are also the states with the widest access to abortion and other reproductive health services. The states with the most restrictive abortion laws are also, as a rule, the states that do the least for families and children as a matter of public policy.
Another way to make this connection is simply to look at a map of states that continue to refuse to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act and compare it with a map of states that outlaw (or effectively outlaw) abortion. The overlap fits the pattern.
This distance — between the rhetoric of “life” and the reality of conservative Republican governance — only looks like hypocrisy. In truth, it is perfectly consistent.
That’s because the Republican ideal of a “pro-family” agenda is girded on traditional hierarchies. Reproductive autonomy, up to and including the right to get an abortion, weakens hierarchies of gender. And the social safety net — especially one that extends directly to mothers and children — undermines the preferred conservative social order of isolated, atomized households kept in line through market discipline.
If the goal of abortion opponents and politicians is to encourage life and promote families, then, yes, their interests and priorities are at odds with their actions. But if the goal is a more rigid and hierarchical world of untrammeled patriarchal authority, then, well, things are pretty much going according to plan.
Why did it not take effort for me to do what it would have taken effort for you to achieve... if you are so smart? You should have been able to coast to at least a B+ average if you were like me.
He’s George Costanza, possibly taller who knows, Roger could’ve been a marine biologist or architect and right now, be on his steed Prickly Pete at his home in the Hampton’s.
But somehow he ended up in a nursing home, sharing a semi private room with the 5th Beatle
But he’s a genius, co…STAN…ZA…
He probably lost his ex’s money to The Human Fund, he could’ve been a philanthropist, a kick ass philanthropist….
LOL
A 'significant development': Job of the staffer Trump called revealed by CNN
Bob Brigham
July 13, 2022
One day after GOP. Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming dropped a bombshell about potential witness tampering during her closing statement at a Jan. 6 select committee hearing, CNN has learned more about the witness in question.
"After our last hearing, President Trump tried to call a witness in our investigation," Cheney said.
"A witness you have not yet seen in these hearings," she explained. "That person declined to answer or respond to President Trump's call and, instead, alerted their lawyer to the call. Their lawyer alerted us and this committee has supplied that information to the Department of Justice."
"Let me say one more time, we will take any effort to influence witness testimony very seriously," Cheney warned.
"Former President Donald Trump tried to call a member of the White House support staff who was talking to the House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, two sources familiar with the matter tell CNN," reporters Ryan Nobles, Dana Bash, Annie Grayer, and Zachary Cohen reported.
READ: J6 committee member hints at new whistleblower testimony at future hearing
Legal experts said on Tuesday that the call made Trump look guilty.
"The support staffer was not someone who routinely communicated with the former President and was concerned about the contact, according to the sources, and informed their attorney. The call was made after former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified publicly to the committee. The White House staffer was in a position to corroborate part of what Hutchinson had said under oath, according to the sources."
Nobles offered his analysis on CNN.
"So this is a significant development, something that many people have been trying to figure out and we can now report that the person who received this phone call was a member of the White House support staff who at least had some knowledge of Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony," he said
Former President Donald Trump tried to call a member of the White House support staff who was talking to the House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, two sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.
The support staffer was not someone who routinely communicated with the former President and was concerned about the contact, according to the sources, and informed their attorney.
The call was made after former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified publicly to the committee. The White House staffer was in a position to corroborate part of what Hutchinson had said under oath, according to the sources.
CNN was told the position of the witness Trump tried to call, but not the person’s name. Details about the witness Trump tried to contact have not been previously reported.
The initial revelation about Trump’s phone call was made in a dramatic moment at the end of this week’s hearing by committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney. Cheney, a Wyoming Republican, revealed that Trump “tried to call” an unnamed witness in the committee’s investigation. She said that witness “declined to answer or respond” to Trump’s call and instead alerted their lawyer. The committee has since supplied that information to the Department of Justice.
Revisiting Trump's long history of trying to influence witnesses
“We will take any effort to influence witness testimony very seriously,” Cheney said Tuesday during the hearing.
A spokesperson for the House select committee declined to comment. A Trump spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request to comment.
Rep. Pete Aguilar, a California Democrat who serves on the committee, told CNN on Tuesday that the individual Trump tried to call has been speaking with the panel.
“Trump himself had called someone who has been talking with us,” Aguilar said.
A source familiar with the panel’s investigation added that the committee has spoken to the person Trump tried to call, but not as part of a deposition.
Mississippi Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chairman of the committee, told CNN Wednesday that Trump attempting to call this witness was concerning enough to raise it to the Department of Justice.
“From my vantage point, it is highly unusual to do that, and that’s why we more or less put that in the hands of the Justice Department, for them to make that decision,” Thompson said, when asked if the act of Trump calling the person was enough evidence to determine whether he was attempting to intimidate a witness. “We are concerned about witnesses’ safety.”
Ad feedback
This is not the first time the committee has raised concerns about potential witness tampering.
“This has been an ongoing pattern and we’re trying to send the message that witness tampering is a crime in the United States of America. People should not be approaching witnesses to try to get them to alter their testimony,” Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, who serves on the panel, told CNN on Tuesday.
At the end of the hearing featuring Hutchinson last month, Cheney brought up two examples of possible witness intimidation without naming a witness or who had made contact. Sources have told CNN that both instances recounted by Cheney in that June hearing had been directed at Hutchinson, and that Hutchinson believes the messages were intended to influence her testimony.
He tried to influence with a member of his staff
Illegal
You know, we are concerned obviously about the witness. And we’re not going to put that witness in unnecessary jeopardy,” Thompson, D-Miss., said a day after the panel first revealed the alleged call
Yes witnesses tampering or intimidation is illegal
But what was he thinking?
Former President Donald Trump tried to call a member of the White House support staff who was talking to the House committee investigating the Capitol insurrection, a source familiar with the issue told NBC News on Wednesday.
CNN first reported that the witness works at the White House.
And all of the regular news report that the Department of Justice is increasing investigations rapidly.
Former President Donald Trump tried to call a member of the White House support staff who was talking to the House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, two sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.
The support staffer was not someone who routinely communicated with the former President and was concerned about the contact, according to the sources, and informed their attorney.
The call was made after former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified publicly to the committee. The White House staffer was in a position to corroborate part of what Hutchinson had said under oath, according to the sources.
CNN was told the position of the witness Trump tried to call, but not the person's name. Details about the witness Trump tried to contact have not been previously reported.
The initial revelation about Trump's phone call was made in a dramatic moment at the end of this week's hearing by committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney. Cheney, a Wyoming Republican, revealed that Trump "tried to call" an unnamed witness in the committee's investigation. She said that witness "declined to answer or respond" to Trump's call and instead alerted their lawyer. The committee has since supplied that information to the Department of Justice.
"We will take any effort to influence witness testimony very seriously," Cheney said Tuesday during the hearing.
A spokesperson for the House select committee declined to comment. A Trump spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request to comment.
Rep. Pete Aguilar, a California Democrat who serves on the committee, told CNN on Tuesday that the individual Trump tried to call has been speaking with the panel.
"Trump himself had called someone who has been talking with us," Aguilar said.
A source familiar with the panel's investigation added that the committee has spoken to the person Trump tried to call, but not as part of a deposition.
Mississippi Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chairman of the committee, told CNN Wednesday that Trump attempting to call this witness was concerning enough to raise it to the Department of Justice.
"From my vantage point, it is highly unusual to do that, and that's why we more or less put that in the hands of the Justice Department, for them to make that decision," Thompson said, when asked if the act of Trump calling the person was enough evidence to determine whether he was attempting to intimidate a witness. "We are concerned about witnesses' safety."
This is not the first time the committee has raised concerns about potential witness
tampering.
"This has been an ongoing pattern and we're trying to send the message that witness tampering is a crime in the United States of America. People should not be approaching witnesses to try to get them to alter their testimony," Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, who serves on the panel, told CNN on Tuesday.
At the end of the hearing featuring Hutchinson last month, Cheney brought up two examples of possible witness intimidation without naming a witness or who had made contact. Sources have told CNN that both instances recounted by Cheney in that June hearing had been directed at Hutchinson, and that Hutchinson believes the messages were intended to influence her testimony.
In one instance, Cheney said a witness received a call in which someone said: "(A person) let me know you have your deposition tomorrow. He wants me to let you know that he's thinking about you. He knows you're loyal, and you're going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition."
Multiple sources previously told CNN the witness was Hutchinson and the "person" referred to in the message, which was redacted in the version projected on a screen during the hearing, was former White House chief of staff Meadows.
Ben Williamson, a spokesperson for Meadows, denied that Meadows or anyone in his "camp" attempted to intimidate Hutchinson or influence her testimony.
"No one from Meadows camp, himself or otherwise, ever sought to intimidate or shape her conversations with the committee," Williamson told CNN.
The second example previously cited by the committee -- a witness statement detailing the pressure campaign from Trump's orbit -- also involved Hutchinson, the sources told CNN.
"What they said to me is, as long as I continue to be a team player, they know that I'm on the team. I'm doing the right thing. I'm protecting who I need to protect, you know, I'll continue to stay in good graces in Trump World," Cheney said at the hearing, relaying the witness statement that sources now say is Hutchinson. "And they have reminded me a couple of times that Trump does read transcripts and just to keep that in mind as I proceed through my depositions and interviews with the committee."
This story has been updated with additional details Wednesday.
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
A recording of the phone call is admissible.
I've worked in telecom for over 30 years.
Please explain to me how one records a phone call that was never connected or completed.
I'm asking because if you could show me how this is done, then we've stumbled upon a major new revenue stream for the telcos, including my current employer.
But he’s a genius, co…STAN…ZA…
https://youtu.be/vn_PSJsl0LQ
What could be recorded from a non-call?
And your claim to have worked in telecom is most amusing as there will be a record of the call being made !!!!! Sorry sport, you screwed the pooch again with your zeal and trumps dick stuck up your ass!!!!!!!!
This could be far more likely way to stop another January 6th insurrection again than the House committee investigation ๐.
The Jan. 6 committee shares one major goal with a handful of GOP senators: modernizing the 135-year-old law that governs the transition of presidential power. Except those Republicans aren’t looking to the select panel for help.
Politically speaking, their task is hard enough as it is. Working with a small group of Democrats, the GOP senators are aiming to get a filibuster-proof majority in their chamber backing an update to the 1887 law that Donald Trump’s allies used to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to block certification of the 2020 election.
Senators involved in the monthslong effort say they’re getting close to a deal. Their goal is passing legislation on the Electoral Count Act by the end of the year, well in advance of the 2024 campaign — and before House Republicans are poised to take power with little interest in addressing the topic. But any standalone bill they can get through the Senate could compete for attention and floor time with the Jan. 6 committee’s still-unreleased legislative recommendations.
Republican senators emphasized in interviews that the select panel’s work had little influence on their separate negotiations. Asked whether the House committee’s interest in reforming the Electoral Count Act affects the bipartisan talks she’s leading, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) replied simply: “Not really.”
“We’ve been working for months on this issue and have really done a deep dive into the problems and ambiguities that exist in this 1887 law,” Collins said. “My hope is that we will wrap up our work shortly … I suspect we will introduce a bill within the coming days.”
Senate negotiators on the proposal, led on the Democratic side by West Virginia’s Sen. Joe Manchin, are seeking to clarify that the vice president’s role in the certification of electoral votes is simply ministerial. In other words, their final product would effectively cut off the argument that Trump backers used to try to overturn his loss to Joe Biden.
Collins said the bipartisan group circulated text three weeks ago and expects the Senate Rules Committee to take up the bill. Their plan also seeks to raise the threshold required for members of Congress to challenge election results; clarify arcane language in the law related to a “failed election"; direct the Postal Service to develop best practices for handling absentee ballots; and specify who can submit a slate of electors from any particular state.
Even if the group can finalize language in the coming days — it held a pivotal meeting Wednesday evening — the timing for final passage of their bill is far from clear. Much of the Senate’s floor time this month is expected to be devoted to nominations and Democrats’ push for a party-line package addressing prescription drugs, tax reform and climate. The proposal could be divided into two bills, to speed up the process. And there’s always the possibility it could get folded into a must-pass bill at the end of the year.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/14/jan-6-2020-election-electoral-count-act-00045659
Blogger anonymous said...
What could be recorded from a non-call?
And your claim to have worked in telecom is most amusing as there will be a record of the call being made !!!!!
That's not what I challenged BWAA.
Try to keep up.
The illustrious alky with the 1.42 IQ said this -
Blogger Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
A recording of the phone call is admissible.
Recording?
There was nothing to record.
That's different that a 'call record.'
And if pocket/butt dialing someone is now a felony, most of America belongs in prison.
Thank you for staying true to your idiocy, BWAA.
Fatty’s probably got a Jitterbug flip with really large numbers
The President just finished a news conference in
JERUSALEM (AP) — President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid on Thursday discussed Iran’s rapidly progressing nuclear program, with the Israeli leader vowing afterward that “there will be no nuclear Iran.”
The U.S. president, who is set to travel to Saudi Arabia on Friday, said he also stressed to Lapid the importance of Israel becoming “totally integrated” in the region.
Their one-on-one talks are the centerpiece of a 48-hour visit by Biden aimed at strengthening already tight relations between the U.S and Israel. The leaders also issued a joint declaration emphasizing military cooperation and a commitment to preventing Iran, which Israel considers an enemy, from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
“We discussed the Iranian threat,” Lapid told reporters afterward. “There will be no nuclear Iran.”
Israeli officials have sought to use Biden’s first visit to the Middle East as president to underscore that Iran’s nuclear program has progressed too far and e ncourage the Biden administration t o scuttle efforts to revive a 2015 agreement with Iran to limit its development.
He left open a military response to Iran getting nuclear weapons.
Hopefully the dementia president won't fuck up the Abraham Accords President Trump brokered across the middle east.
Holy shit shorty......don't you have some insurance to sell????????BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
That's different that a 'call record.'
WHICH IS WHAT ROGER WAS TALKING ABOUT YOU IGNORANT ASSHOLE!!!!! You and your bias interpreted as a call record......fucking idiot
When asked what he thought of the possibility that Trump might run again for president, Biden replied,
"I would welcome it."
Why I consider the Ohio GOP voters who support this asshole should lose their right to vote!!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!
INSIDER
GOP Rep. Jim Jordan deletes tweet calling the story of a 10-year-old girl being raped 'another lie' after Ohio authorities charged a man in the case
Brent D. Griffiths
AND INDEED, THAT COULD BE
The One Thing That Could Save Joe Biden
July 14, 2022 at 7:44 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 35 Comments
Charlie Sykes: “With Trump in the race, Biden would no longer be running against the ghost of FDR, or a generic Republican. He wouldn’t be constantly compared with a mythical progressive pol who could magically enact sweeping spending plans in an evenly divided Congress.
“The alternative would be Trump.
“That fact alone would go a long way toward fixing some of Biden’s problems. Democrats, who are now wallowing in their season of acedia and self-loathing, would come home.
“If anything, the defeated, disgraced, twice impeached president, in pouting exile, has become more vicious, unhinged, narcissistic, dishonest, reckless, and demagogic than he was as Mad King.”
SO NOMINATE TRUMP, GOP!
DO!
Indiana to Investigate Doctor of 10-Year Old Girl
July 14, 2022 at 7:53 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 66 Comments
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita (R) told Fox News his office would investigate a doctor who provided an abortion to a 10-year-old girl who was raped and became pregnant.
Said Rokita: “We’re gathering the evidence as we speak, and we’re going to fight this to the end, including looking at her licensure if she failed to report. And in Indiana it’s a crime… to intentionally not report.”
Judd Legum: The right-wing smear campaign against a doctor who helped a 10-year old rape victim.
SO NOMINATE TRUMP, GOP!
DO!
The left was shrieking the same thing in 2015/2016.
How'd THAT work out for ya, pederast?
LOL.
rrb said...
SO NOMINATE TRUMP, GOP!
DO!
The left was shrieking the same thing in 2015/2016.
How'd THAT work out for ya, pederast?
With any luck the GOP takes the House and immediately cleasn up after the Jan 6th committee.
Maybe 6 Republicans and Tulsi Gabbard and another sane democrat if they can be found
Release the Video, see who really started the rioting and hold them to account, including Epps and any violent protestors
Get the bodycam video from officers around the protestors who died
Do a real investigation of the one shooting
Highlight Pelosi's failure to secure
Secure her emails and texts
Same with all J6 committee members
Do Fauci and Gates
2024 should be a cakewalk if 2022 happens
Unless GOP "leadership" fucks up
Hopefully they will be replaced
hey no "check all that apply" spam filter yet
The Gospel According to Goddard lying waterboy must not be around or just very drowsy and not active
No false accusations of "censorship" while spamming mercilessly
without a clue...
ROFLMFAO !!!
RNC Research
@RNCResearch
Two straight minutes of Democrats LYING about inflation
EXCLUSIVE: ROGER STONE FIRES BACK at the January 6th Committee’s Smear
By Joe Hoft
Once again, the elaborately produced January 6th Committee television show-trial has used sleight of hand and “guilt by association” to try to tie me to illegal activities at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th. They failed.
The hype surrounding this hearing by Rolling Stone, NPR, the Washington Post, the New York Times and others insisted the hearing would prove that I was the connection between the President, the Trump White House and those arrested for breaking into the Capitol on January 6th. No such proof was produced because none exists.
Their assertion is that simply because I know members of the Proud Boys and came in contact with members of the Oath Keepers, means I must have had some advance knowledge of the illegal activities of some of their members on January 6th. This is false and there is no conversation, phone call, text message, encrypted message, witness, or documentary film footage that would prove otherwise.
By their reasoning, If the fact that I know or had photos taken with members of the Proud Boys or had contact with members of the Oath Keepers means I am an insurrectionist then Adam Schiff’s association and photos with Ed Buck means he is guilty of the murder of young gay Black men. It’s absurd.
That the Oath Keepers voluntarily provided security for me on January 5th because of my inability to obtain the services of the off-duty D.C. police officers that I used for this purpose during my trial, which was made public by me again proves nothing. It’s a sad commentary on the state of affairs in America today that I cannot travel to any major city or state without the threat of physical violence against me or my family. That there were messages limited to the logistics of this security in an e-mail to me is not new nor is it significant but Forbes among others acted like this is some kind of bombshell. It isn’t.
At least the Committee did not, for the third time, recycle the false claim that at President Trump’s direction, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows called me on January 5th, to, according to Rep. Liz Cheney, “find out what was going to happen January 6th.”
The Committee first promulgated this lie back in March 28, 2022 and more recently recycled it as hearsay evidence according to former White House staffer Cassidy Hutchinson. In fact, I have never spoken to Mark Meadows on the telephone, although I did meet him once in 2019 when he was a Congressman.
Nor was I involved in the efforts to persuade the U.S. Senate to delay the certification of the electoral college result sending electors back to the state legislators for a reexamination of the vote in certain states. If there was a “War Room” at the Willard, I was unaware of it and I most certainly never visited it.
The Committee did play a clip of my constitutionally protected speech at a legally permitted rally on January 5th in I which I said I saw an apocalyptic choice for America between “dark and light, good and evil, the Godly and the Godless ” and which I stated that if we lose this struggle that ” America will step off into a thousand years of darkness. To claim that these remarks incited violence is, of course, nonsense, and criticism of them is religious bigotry.
Much was also made of the existence of a “Friends of Stone” chat room neither set up nor controlled by me. I did occasionally post links to stories I have written for the Gateway Pundit there. Proving, once again…nothing.
During the two-year (plus) Mueller witch-hunt in which I was vilified, smeared, threatened, framed, lynched, denied my constitutional rights at trial, censored, “canceled,” bankrupted, redeemed in Jesus Christ and ultimately pardoned, I was gagged both before, during and after the trial.
It was during this over two-year period that I was subjected to a veritable tsunami of false allegations by the media, at the same time being denied any forum whatsoever to defend myself. Sadly, this has made me one of the most hated targets on the “woke” American left.
This largely explains why the House Democrats, still furious that I escaped the fabricated but deadly snare set for me by Robert Mueller and Congressman Adam Schiff, now seek to falsely embroil me in the controversy surrounding January 6th. Quite simply, I am clickbait for the hateful American left and the myriad of phony left-wing “news sites” who gleefully report any malicious falsehood asserted against me anywhere.
The relentless attacks on me have taken their toll. In addition to the latest smear by the January 6th Committee, I have had to contend with over 17 baseless, groundless, unsubstantiated harassment civil lawsuit against me—including one civil lawsuit against me and President Trump by multiple Capitol Hill police officers, propped up by a George Soros front organization which blames us for “endangering” them on January 6th.
On December 17th, 2021, I fulfilled my legal obligations under the January 6th Committee’s subpoena.
I invoked my Fifth Amendment rights not to answer questions. I did so, not because I have done anything wrong or have anything to hide, but because I have extensive firsthand experience with the House Democrats’ ability to take innocuous, immaterial and irrelevant statements made under oath and twist them into crimes.
The unhinged hatred and threats against me and my family on Twitter by menopausal harpies and other haters certainly violate Twitter’s Rules but continue unabated. Violence and public shaming are increasingly a favored tactic of the left. If you can threaten a US Supreme Court Justice without consequences, why not Roger Stone and his family?
This baseless focus on me is driven by bloodlust and threatens to bankrupt and endanger me and my family. My censorship and “cancelation” on every major social media platform makes it far more difficult for me to sell my books or products. There is not a month in which the combination of my legal bills, modest living expenses and my wife’s uninsured medical expenses after a successful fight with Stage 4 cancer do not exceed the amount of money I earn that month.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/exclusive-roger-stone-fires-back-january-6th-committees-smear/
hopefully this will happen to the "pastor" (roger has no worth) and he can see what real censorship is
Violence and public shaming are increasingly a favored tactic of the left. If you can threaten a US Supreme Court Justice without consequences, why not Roger Stone and his family?
"justice" under Joe Biden
Biden Crime Family Godfather
1984
THE ATLANTIC:
January 6 Was Trump’s Project All Along
And the Department of Justice has more than enough evidence to prosecute him for it.
After seven hearings held by the January 6 committee thus far this summer, doubts as to who is responsible have been resolved. The evidence is now overwhelming that Donald Trump was the driving force behind a massive criminal conspiracy to interfere with the official January 6 congressional proceeding and to defraud the United States of a fair election outcome.
The evidence is clearer and more robust than we as former federal prosecutors—two of us as Department of Justice officials in Republican administrations—thought possible before the hearings began. Trump was not just a willing beneficiary of a complex plot in which others played most of the primary roles. While in office, he himself was the principal actor in nearly all of its phases, personally executing key parts of most of its elements and aware of or involved in its worst features, including the use of violence on Capitol Hill. Most remarkably, he did so over vehement objections raised at every turn, even by his sycophantic and loyal handpicked team. This was Trump’s project all along.
Everyone knew before the hearings began that we were dealing with perhaps the gravest imaginable offense against the nation short of secession—a serious nationwide effort pursued at multiple levels to overturn the unambiguous outcome of a national election. We all knew as well that efforts were and are unfolding nationwide to change laws and undermine electoral processes with the specific objective of succeeding at the same project in 2024 and after. But each hearing has sharpened our understanding that Donald Trump himself is the one who made it happen.
Quinta Jurecic: The January 6 committee is going to have the final word
As former prosecutors, we recognize the legitimacy of concerns that electoral winners prosecuting their defeated opponents may look like something out of a banana republic rather than the United States of America; that doing so might be viewed as opening the door to prosecutorial retaliation by future presidential winners; and that, in the case of this former president, it might lead to civil unrest.
But given the record now before us, all of these considerations must give way to the urgency of achieving a public reckoning for Donald Trump. The damage to America’s future that would be inflicted by giving him a pass far outweighs the risks of prosecuting him.
The committee’s evidence to date establishes multiple significant points for prosecutors. (A comprehensive summary of the evidence—offense by offense—is available at Just Security’s “Criminal Evidence Tracker.”)
First, contrary to speculation that Trump may have genuinely believed he won the election, and thus in his own mind was seeking rough justice in trying to change the outcome, the committee has demonstrated repeatedly that he knew beyond all doubt that he had lost fair and square. Trump’s former attorney general Bill Barr told the president that claims of widespread voter fraud were “bullshit.” Numerous reinforcements of that message were delivered by many others, including Barr’s successor, former Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen; former Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue; and multiple Trump-campaign officials.
Second, Trump’s involvement in carrying out the scheme was systematic, expansive, and extraordinarily personal. As if to illustrate how personal his intervention was (and is), Republican Liz Cheney, the committee’s vice chair and the representative from Wyoming, dropped a bombshell at the end of Tuesday’s hearing: Sometime since the previous hearing on June 28, Trump himself had contacted a witness, something that his lawyers certainly could have told him could easily lead to charges of witness tampering. Cheney announced that the committee has notified the Justice Department of Trump’s latest misconduct.
The committee’s previous hearings showed that in the months after the 2020 election, Trump himself—not some aide or lawyer or other ally—tried to interfere with the state vote-counting processes. Among the most memorable incidents was his 67-minute January 2 call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger asking him to “find” 11,780 nonexistent votes, creating a Trump win. Trump himself also called to try to influence the state’s chief elections investigator, Frances Watson, and spoke with Georgia Governor Brian Kemp to urge him to call a special legislative session to appoint alternative electors.
There is also evidence that Trump spoke with Republican Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler after he had declined repeated calls from Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, two Trump-campaign attorneys, to bring the legislature into session to decertify the state’s election results. And Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel and Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers, also a Republican, both testified that Trump phoned them in December to ask for their help in implementing the infamous bogus-elector scheme. (John Eastman, another Trump lawyer, and Giuliani were also involved with those calls.)
Trump tried persistently to obtain the help of the Department of Justice in creating a false public impression that the election had been fraudulent. After he failed in mid-December to persuade Bill Barr to assert election fraud, Trump called Rosen, Barr’s successor, nearly every day in the same pursuit. And when this effort too failed, at a White House meeting on January 3, he undertook to replace Rosen with Jeffrey Clark, a second-tier DOJ official whom Trump had spoken with personally and found more compliant. This effort failed only when Donoghue and Rosen told Trump that the entire department would resign if Clark were installed.
Crucial to the whole plot, of course, was the unlawful scheme to pressure Vice President Mike Pence into rejecting or delaying the electoral count. Multiple witnesses testified about being present to hear Trump’s “heated” call with Pence on the morning of January 6. One witness said that Trump called Pence a “wimp.” Ivanka Trump testified that she had never previously heard her father treat Pence that way, and she told another witness that Trump had used the “P-word” to denigrate the vice president’s manhood.
Ample evidence has also shown Trump well knew that Pence could not properly do as Trump urged. Mike Pence’s counsel, Greg Jacob, testified that Trump was present at a January 4 White House meeting where John Eastman admitted the unlawfulness of his and Trump’s plan to have the vice president not certify the electoral count two days later.
A third significant point for prosecutors is that the hearings have put into sharp focus Trump’s personal involvement and advance knowledge of the dangerous circumstances surrounding the January 6 insurrection. Cassidy Hutchinson, who was the principal aide to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, testified that she overheard Trump complain just before his January 6 speech on the Ellipse that supporters were not being allowed into the security area for his speech while armed, and thus were staying outside. She recalled Trump asking to have the magnetometers removed, saying that he did not care if attendees were armed, because “they’re not here to hurt me.”
Hutchinson also testified that Trump expected to go to the Capitol after his speech and was angry when the Secret Service denied his request to do so, testimony that others have corroborated. He wanted to be part of and lead an armed mob aimed, at minimum, at intimidating Congress and Mike Pence. That is significant evidence demonstrating criminal intent in connection with the crime of inciting an insurrection. Told that the mob had threatened to hang the vice president, Trump apparently responded that he “deserves” it.
Finally, the committee has persuasively established that Trump continued to facilitate the insurrection, even after he returned to the White House once the Secret Service refused to take him to Capitol Hill. Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley testified that during the violence, Pence called him to request the National Guard to restore order; Trump made no such call. In fact, Trump did nothing for more than three hours to quell the insurrectionists.
To the contrary, Deputy White House Press Secretary Sarah Matthews testified that by tweeting that Pence “didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done” to overturn the election, Trump was “pouring gasoline on the fire.”All of that was enough to show Trump’s personal leadership of the Big Lie effort and his complicity in the violence of January 6. But in addition, at Tuesday’s hearing, the committee focused attention on Trump’s December 19 tweet inviting his supporters to a “big protest in D.C. on January 6th.” He added, “Be there, will be wild!” The committee showed evidence of communications among the militant Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and Three Percenters hours after the tweet demonstrating that it was the signal that prompted previously unaligned groups to cooperate in developing military-style operational tactics for the violent Capitol invasion.
In assessing the importance and priority to be given to a DOJ decision to prosecute, the Justice Department Manual lists three factors with special relevance here:
“the nature and seriousness of the offense,”
“the deterrent effect of the prosecution,”
and “the person’s culpability in connection with the offense.”
On the first point, it is hard to imagine an offense that would more urgently call for criminal accountability by federal prosecution than a concerted and nearly successful effort to overthrow the result of a presidential election. It is an offense against the entire nation, by which Trump sought to reverse a 235-year-old constitutional tradition of presidential power transferring lawfully and peacefully.
The fact that a related state grand-jury investigation is proceeding in Fulton County, Georgia, relating to the part of the plot aimed at the Georgia vote count and certification process does not alter or lessen the urgency of this federal interest. Separate state and federal prosecutions can and should proceed when federal interests are as strong or stronger than the local interest.
DisHonest, indecent, untruthful and ignorant Rev. said...
THE ATLANTIC
oh that mega billionaire bought rag used for democrat propaganda
not that you would know
how much is the owner making off Chinese slave labor ?
and how many have died enriching her ?
Nor can there be any doubt about the crucial need to deter future attempts to overthrow the government. For the past 18 months, and presently, Trump himself and his supporters have been engaged in concerted efforts across the country to prepare for a similar, but better-planned, effort to overcome the minority status of Trump’s support and put him back in the White House. Moreover, if the efforts of the former president and his supporters garner a pass from the federal authorities, even in the face of such overwhelming evidence, Trump will not be the only one ready to play this game for another round.
As many have pointed out, deterrence requires that the quest for accountability succeed in achieving a conviction before a jury—here most likely made up of citizens of the District of Columbia. And the Department’s regulations make the odds of the prosecution’s success an important consideration in determining whether to go forward. In the case of a person who has made a career out of escaping the consequences of his misconduct, this is no small issue for the attorney general to take into account.
But as former prosecutors, we have faith that the evidence of personal culpability is so overwhelming that the case can be made to the satisfaction of such a jury. One of us—Gerson—has tried many difficult cases before DC juries with success. If Donald Trump were the defendant, he would open the door to all sorts of things that wouldn’t come into a normal trial, and the prosecutor could have a field day in argument about how this would-be tyrant tried to overthrow the government that has kept our nation free for two and a quarter centuries.
Bottom line: Given what is at stake, even with the risk of a hung jury—leaving room for a second trial—there is no realistic alternative but to go forward.
Any argument that Donald Trump lacked provable criminal intent is contradicted by the facts elicited by the January 6 committee. And the tradition of not prosecuting a former president must yield to the manifest need to protect our constitutional form of government and to assure that the violent effort to overthrow it is never repeated.
By Donald Ayer, Stuart Gerson, and Dennis Aftergut
About the authors: Donald Ayer served as United States attorney and principal deputy solicitor general in the Reagan administration and as deputy attorney general under George H. W. Bush.
Stuart M. Gerson served as assistant attorney general for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice from 1989 to 1993 and as acting attorney General in 1993. He is a member of the firm at Epstein Becker Green.
Dennis Aftergut is a former federal prosecutor and former Chief Assistant City Attorney in San Francisco, currently Of Counsel to Lawyers Defending American Democracy.
THE ATLANTIC
oh that mega billionaire bought rag used for democrat propaganda
not that you would know
how much is the owner making off Chinese slave labor ?
and how many have died enriching her ?
too tough ?
THE ATLANTIC is one of the most prestigious publications in America and in the world.
btw, this is what you call a "link"
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/exclusive-roger-stone-fires-back-january-6th-committees-smear/
which somehow the "pastor" never includes
that's a real good one
sure hit a nerve with the "pastor"
ROFLMFAO !!!
DisHonest, indecent, untruthful and ignorant Rev. said...
THE ATLANTIC is one of the most prestigious publications in America and in the world.
It's just like the Washington Post, recently bought by a MEGA BILLIONAIRE, the kind you apparently like
but you still haven't answered the question:
how much is the owner making off Chinese slave labor ?
and how many have died enriching her ?
I wouldn't label that "prestigious" anymore
oops got a "select all the squares"
and the "pastor" is here
you know what that means...
THANK YOU, F DADDY, for printing at what I said at 8:53 after it got deleted. THANKS!
Caliphate4vr said...
RNC Research
@RNCResearch
Two straight minutes of Democrats LYING about inflation
Its apparently in democrats DNA, along with accusing others with what you are actually doing
THE ATLANTIC is one of the most prestigious publications in America and in the world.
Deleted pastor said...
THANK YOU, F DADDY, for printing at what I said at 8:53 after it got deleted. THANKS!
you're welcome
but you still haven't answered the question:
how much is the Atlantic owner making off Chinese slave labor ?
and how many have died enriching her ?
and I guess why would you call anyone associated with that "prestigious"?
odd behavior for a pastor
"Let me say one more time, we will take any effort to influence witness testimony very seriously," Cheney warned.
"Former President Donald Trump tried to call a member of the White House support staff who was talking to the House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, two sources familiar with the matter tell CNN," reporters Ryan Nobles, Dana Bash, Annie Grayer, and Zachary Cohen reported.
Legal experts said on Tuesday that the call made Trump look guilty of witnesses tampering.
His impulsive behavior could put him in jail.
another bloodbath in the stock market today
Dow down 600
Let's see inflation up 9%
real wages down 4%
wealth being destroyed
what are democrats focused on ?
This describes Scott to a tee.
Trump supporters have spent much of the past half dozen years defending their man; their political and cultural identity has become fused with his. Some of them may have started out as lukewarm allies, but over time their support became less qualified and more enthusiastic. The unusual intensity of the Trump years increased their bond to him. He was the captain of Team Red. In their minds, loyalty demanded they stick with him, acting as his shield one day, his sword the next.
What began as a reluctant willingness to defend Trump soon became an ingrained habit. They ignored or excused his moral and legal transgressions; each time they did, the next excuse got a little easier. They could not bear to acknowledge to themselves, and certainly not to anyone else, that they were defending a seditious scoundrel. The cognitive dissonance was overwhelming; their self-conception would not allow them to admit they were complicit in a corrupt enterprise. This was particularly the case of those who insisted for decades prior to the Trump era that high moral character mattered in political leaders. And so they twisted themselves into knots, downplaying Trump’s maliciousness, hyper-focusing on the sins of the left. They rather liked that Trump would bring a Glock to a political and cultural knife fight.
Well, I suggest that all of us should just go to the excellent Wikipedia article on THE ATLANTIC and see if we can find any real facts there about THE ATLANTIC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlantic
His impulsive behavior could put him in jail.
Will they be releasing a recording of the incomplete phone call, alky?
You know. The one that ensures that Trump dies in prison.
That one.
America Last
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/trump-supporters-january-6-hearing/670508/?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
Well, I suggest that all of us should just go to the excellent Wikipedia article on THE ATLANTIC and see if we can find any real facts there about THE ATLANTIC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlantic
Well, I suggest that all of us should just go to the excellent Wikipedia article on THE ATLANTIC and see if we can find any real facts there about THE ATLANTIC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlantic
Well, I suggest that all of us should just go to the excellent Wikipedia article on THE ATLANTIC and see if we can find any real facts there about THE ATLANTIC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlantic
Well, I suggest that all of us should just go to the excellent Wikipedia article on THE ATLANTIC and see if we can find any real facts there about THE ATLANTIC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlantic
Yahoo Finance
Stock market news live updates: Stocks sink as Dimon warns of 'negative consequences' from inflation, Fed
U.S. stocks fell at Thursday’s market open as investors reeled from shock inflation data and digested earnings from some of Wall Street's big banks.
The S&P 500 and Dow both dropped 1.9% shortly after the open, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq was down closer to 1.7% in early trade.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-updates-july-14-2022-115058342.html
Now down over 600
thanks Joe
or as Hunter calls him
Pedo Peter
She never accepted the phone call, but the simple fact is she was a potential witness, and she reported it to her lawyer and the house committee, the former President should be charged for witnesses tampering.
Hilarious -
The German energy crisis has reached the point where Deutsche Bank starts to 'model' (let's call it that) the potential for **gas-to-wood** substitution for heating German households this winter |
https://twitter.com/JavierBlas/status/1547180581141766144
First Sri Lanka, and now Germany. Going Green is moronic.
It was founded in 1857 in Boston, as The Atlantic Monthly, a literary and cultural magazine that published leading writers' commentary on education, the abolition of slavery, and other major political issues of that time. Its founders included Francis H. Underwood[4][5] and prominent writers Ralph Waldo Emerson, Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and John Greenleaf Whittier.[6][
Anonymous Uncensored Roger said...
She never accepted the phone call, but the simple fact is she was a potential witness, and she reported it to her lawyer and the house committee, the former President should be charged for witnesses tampering.
Right.
The fact that the attempt even fucking happened is complete hearsay, but don't let that get in the way of your TDS-Fueled obsession.
Ch, I know that you in all your brilliant intelligence and jurisprudent knowledge will very much enjoy the wonderful ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer all your questions about whether Trump really is prosecutable.
As you can see, the answer is yes.
You're welcome.
Future criminals
Andy Ngรด ๐ณ️๐
@MrAndyNgo
In disturbing video obtained by
@AlphaNewsMN
, very young children in a hood in St. Paul, Minn. were recorded hitting police & cursing expletives at them.
DisHonest, indecent, untruthful and ignorant Rev. said...
Well, I suggest that all of us should just go to the excellent Wikipedia article on THE ATLANTIC and see if we can find any real facts there about THE ATLANTIC.
"After experiencing financial hardship and undergoing several ownership changes in the late 20th century...In July 2017, Bradley sold a majority interest in the publication to Laurene Powell Jobs's "
Oh, Laurene Powell Jobs
the widow of Steve Jobs who inherited all his money
You know from Apple
They use who to make their iPhones ?
Chinese slave labor
Thanks for clearing that up
btw Wikipedia is now completely "edited" by the radical left
It used to be a good source before they took over
still has some good "bones" but lots of bias as everyone knows
including its original co-founder who has spoken out about that numerous times
he is appalled
but you still haven't answered the question:
how much is the Atlantic owner making off Chinese slave labor ?
and how many have died enriching her ?
but you are getting closer...
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
Uncensored Roger said...
It was founded in 1857 in Boston, as The Atlantic Monthly, a literary and cultural magazine that published leading writers' commentary on education, the abolition of slavery, and other major political issues of that time. Its founders included Francis H. Underwood[4][5] and prominent writers Ralph Waldo Emerson, Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and John Greenleaf Whittier.[6][
Yep, they would be rolling in their graves if they could see how the current Atlantic owner has made her money.
Built on their good names
same "business" model another Mega Billionaire used when buying the Washington Post
Also profiting from Chinese slave labor
If you control the press...
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
CPI up over 9%
Wholesale prices up 11.3%
This is serious. Yet, democrats, who control all of congress and the Whitehouse, are more focused on Jan 6, climate change, crt, transgenderism, and a wide open border. Voters are angry and fed up.
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
Ch, I'm sure you will be delighted to have a chance to go to the excellent ATLANTIC article written by three authors imminently qualified to answer your questions as to whether Trump is at all prosecutable by the Justice Department. As you can see, the answer is a definite yes.
You're welcome!
Biden incestuous Family.
World Wide Discrace
The US Voter agrees with Myballsinthewoodsagain
"MyballsinthewoodsagainJuly 14, 2022 at 9:28 AM
CPI up over 9%
Wholesale prices up 11.3%
This is serious. Yet, democrats, who control all of congress and the Whitehouse, are more focused on Jan 6, climate change, crt, transgenderism, and a wide open border. Voters are angry and fed up.
Anonymous Myballsinthewoodsagain said...
CPI up over 9%
Wholesale prices up 11.3%
This is serious. Yet, democrats, who control all of congress and the Whitehouse, are more focused on Jan 6, climate change, crt, transgenderism, and a wide open border. Voters are angry and fed up.
Actual inflation rate=17%
https://twitter.com/SlopeOfHope/status/1547315817485766656?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1547315817485766656%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdirectorblue.blogspot.com%2F2022%2F07%2Ftop-20-tweets-tonight-taco-salad.html
Fact Check: TRUE
President Cunt sold US Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China Thru a Pedo Pete Biden Company .
RRB correct.
Actual inflation rate=17%
Fair Warning, the cost of raising every Animal on the ranch has gone up sharply.
Meat will only get more expensive going forward.
Fair Warning, the cost of raising every Animal on the ranch has gone up sharply.
Meat will only get more expensive going forward.
I'm working with a farmer friend to secure a side for myself and a few close friends. Their feed quality is excellent so his finished steers should be delicious. Grain & grass fed.
Also, trading my old Tundra in on a low mile 2021 CPO Platinum Edition on Saturday.
How many times do I have to tell you that we Democrats are not interested in CRT (Critical Race Theory)? Race is something we inherit, not something to be critical about.
We are interested in CRS (Critical RACISM Studies).
We do not choose the race we are born into.
We DO choose whether or not to be racistic Republicans, as far too many are.
If you control the press...
Odd that Wikipedia doesn't delve into that significant ownership change at the Atlantic and the new owners ties to slave labor
Well at least the same type of ownership change at the Washington Post wouldn't affect their coverage of the Hunter Biden iPhone leak
The one showing the Biden's receiving a bunch of Chinese cash, a real crime
Wait, they didn't cover it ?
odd
almost like they are all doing China's bidding
and you know China hates Trump
and China enriches all of them as the leak documents...
follow the money...
and have at least an ounce of critical thinking
rather than the fed propaganda
1984
Well said!
RRB, the beef move is outstanding.
Tell us more about the 2021 CPO Platinum Edition
Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
How many times do I have to tell you that we Democrats are not interested in CRT (Critical Race Theory)? Race is something we inherit, not something to be critical about.
We are interested in CRS (Critical RACISM Studies).
We do not choose the race we are born into.
We DO choose whether or not to be racistic Republicans, as far too many are.
So the "pastor" choses to be a racist democrat
thanks for clearing that up
Most Republicans could care less about skin color
btw you still haven't answered my question about slavery and the Atlantic
as well as the Washington Post
They have, and are, benefiting from it
Republicans are against that
I guess Democrats are for slavery as long as it is overseas and they benefit?
How many times do I have to point out that we Democrats are not interested in CRT (Critical Race Theory.)
Our race is something we are born into and is not something to be critical about.
No, what we are interested in is CRS (Critical RACISM Studies).
We do not choose which race we are born into. We do, however, choose whether or not we are to be RACISTS, as far too many racistic, White Supremacist White Nationalist Repblicans are.
LOL, once again, F Daddy graciously posted at 9:52 a post of mine that got deleted, yet I repeated it at 9:53.
Sure is sporting of ole F Daddy!
Post a Comment