Is anything said here untrue?
Merrick Garland's Moral Compass Points in One Direction
Parents are labeled domestic terrorists. Selfie-taking grandmothers are sent to prison. People in Trump’s orbit are perp-walked off airplanes and handcuffed for extra humiliation. But protest in front of conservative SCOTUS home in violation of federal law and you get a pass. Hunter Biden’s laptop is suppressed because of politics, but Ashley Biden’s diary is treated like stolen nuclear blueprints. Journalists’ homes are raided over Biden’s diary. An unnecessary raid on a former president’s home, in violation of the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against general warrants, are forms of intimidation not by a tinpot South American dictator, but by the Attorney General of the United States.
7 comments:
And I didn't think it was possible to have a worse AG than Eric Holder.
Who said all that, Ch? Why didn't you tell us? Please provide your source.
Blogger Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
Who said all that, Ch? Why didn't you tell us? Please provide your source.
Thank you for acknowledging the fact that you're too fucking stupid to follow a link, pederast.
Reverend...
I added the link (thought it was there).
But what does it matter?
Are you planning on not answering the question and rather just complaining about the source... which of course is attacking the messenger - a logical fallacy that pretty much proves you have no other argument?
So why not just answer the question?
Tell us what isn't true?
Where Parents not found to have been labeled domestic terrorists? They literally were. Was a woman who is a grandmother not sent to prison based on the fact she took a selfie at the Capitol grounds? Are the protests in front of the Justices house (SAME EXACT LAW AS PARADING AT THE CAPITOL) not being ignored?
Please... don't be a f-n moron and complain about the source!
It's exactly the sort of nonsense trolling that pushes people away.
If you had a "real opinion" and a real "argument"... then the source would be irrelevant.
So now that it's clear you were so f-ing stupid you thought you had added a link when you had not, and now that it's clear it's a lot of bawderdash from Red State, I can add the rest of the article (it's very short) which is equally bawderdashy.
I'll put it in italics, as you did:
Merrick Garland has claimed he performs his job “without fear or favor.” Only one of those verbs is accurate. Garland doesn’t fear congressional oversight. He and Capitol Hill are on the same team. He has the unrestricted support of Democrats in Congress and the pudding brain in the OOffice. He also has the support of the FBI.
He can point his “moral”compass in any direction. It always points in the same direction–whatever helps his cronies in the White House and Congress.
All that bawderdash from Red State doesn't lay a glove on Garland, Ch. He's one of the most conscientiously careful statespersons in the entirety of government.
Be sure to post my last two posts, Ch. The two I posted AFTER your 1:44.
Please... don't be a f-n moron and complain about the source
And then the Reverend attacks the source...
and does not repute a single thing.
Not
One.
Thing.
Reverend... this is internet trolling 101.
The very reason why people stop coming here.
I can literally know EXACTLY how your troll response will be and I am pretty much always right.
Post a Comment