And 60 days before a the 2018 midterms the Giuliani DOJ started sending out subpoenas and confiscating phones of Clinton allies and prominent Democrats under the pretense that these people were illegally "questioning the integrity of the 2016 election results"
 |
| How would the country had reacted? |
9 comments:
Well the left is not scared to riot and burn everything down
but the right is actually real peaceful
none of the Jan 6th deaths were caused by MAGA election protestors
only a handful got "violent"
and we still don't know if any of those were FBI or encouraged by FBI
nor has the Capitol Police released the body cam nor fixed video except for the selected excerpts they wanted to
Banana Republic
"the big guy"
we are fucked
Ah, so it was actually FBI agents in disguise who were breaking out all those windows and smashing open all those doors.
Well Reverend...
It's been proven that the FBI was in the crowd and some were inciting.
But that isn't something Goddard would bring up in his blog. So in your world it does not exist.
Newspaper in UK reporting that John Fetterman failed to disclose that he owns 8 properties. Curious that American media never found that.
Imagine if Donald Trump had appointed someone like Rudy Giuliani ... how would the public have reacted if he began "questioning the integrity of the 2016 election results"?
_____________
Well of course they would have reacted badly because Giuliani has totally discredited himself.
Well Reverend...
So has Garland.
disHonest, indecent, untruthful and ignorant Rev. said...
Ah, so it was actually FBI agents in disguise who were breaking out all those windows and smashing open all those doors.
yea a few doors and windows.
other doors were just opened for them
no fires
no knife or gun attacks
except for the Capitol Policeman who shot and killed an unarmed woman
and yeah, we know from court records some FBI agents were involved. Just not exactly which ones they were. Although Epps sure looks to be one of them. On tape repeatedly encouraging people to breach the Capitol. and not arrested. odd
Why hide all the video evidence except for the selected slices ?
other than the left wants to protect their false narrative
pretty obvious.
kind of like the Hillary, Schiff, Weissmann, Strzok and Mueller Russian collusion hoax
and you know Obama and Biden knew too
Banana Republic
Is Garland going to hold a press conference to announce he finally figured out who "the big guy" is ?
too soon ?
At his trial, Griffin argued that the Justice Department could not prove that he was aware on January 6, 2021, that the grounds around the Capitol were restricted. His lawyer asserted that the ground were no longer restricted when Griffin entered them because then-Vice President Mike Pence had been rushed away to safety amid the violence of January 6.
That argument paved the way for a remarkable revelation. On the witness stand, a Secret Service inspector confirmed that Pence had never left the grounds but instead fled to an underground loading dock beneath the Capitol, where he remained for several hours on January 6.
While he stopped short of giving Griffin additional prison time, McFadden remarked at sentencing on the "grave tension" between his conduct on January 6 and his oath as a county commissioner in New Mexico to protect and defend the Constitution.
In the New Mexico court proceeding, Griffin argued that Matthews should refrain from unseating him and instead defer to the will of the people in Otero County who retained him against a recall effort.
Matthews said he was struck by the irony of Griffin making that argument while defending his participation in an "insurrection by a mob whose role, by his own admission, was to set aside the results of a free, fair and lawful election by a majority of the people of the entire country (the will of the people)."
That irony, he said, "has not escaped this court."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Post a Comment