Vindman posts a statement and almost immediately obvious bots are repeating the same statement word for word? Then he demand that Musk is attacking "him" and suggests that history will see him (Vindman) as the more important of the two men.
Now I am going to start by wondering out loud why Vindman has a blue checkmark. He was a witness in an impeachment hearing and a former military person. The only thing he really had going for him was that he was an anti-Trump nut and full fledged liberal nutjob. Of course that sort of thing mattered at the old twitter. So I guess that is what got him the blue checkmark (will he pay the $8.00 to keep it)?
But how is this for Hubris? Vindman actually believes that "history" will remember him over Elon Musk? Seriously? History is unlikely to remember Alexander Vindman at all, much less compare him favorably to Elon Musk.
The sooner these sort of echo chamber bots are eliminated from Twitter the better. Let's see how popular Vindman is without a bot following and without moderation and without the Twitter gods tilting the playing field in liberal favor.
This is similar to Monica Lewinsky who was upset the other day when a poll post didn't go the way she expected. According to her own poll 90% of the respondents felt that twitter users rather than twitter management should be making decisions for the company. She also was upset that she had 9000 comments (most of which were critical) versus only 4000 likes, blaming the new formulas for the negativity.
But isn't this the way it works in the mind of a liberal. They want the likes without the criticism and they want some group of people to protect them from anyone who disagrees with them. That way, apparently, they can live in this bubble and believe that everyone agrees with everything they say and that those who do not are out there on the fringe. It is not "reality" - but it is has become "their reality" with the help of censorship and management favoritism of one opinion over others.
