Pages

Monday, January 9, 2017

So Hollywood, Foreigners, and the Press are unfairly treated...

Now that's a different way of looking at it?  It's not that Hollywood is out of touch, that foreigners do not necessarily have America's best interest in mind, or that the Press is an unapologetic cheerleader to the liberal politicians... the reality (according to Meryl Streep) is that they are unfairly treated.  

Meryl Streep goes after Donald Trump

The fact that the Golden Globe awards show turned into the Donald Trump bashing hour is part of the reason why so many people are looking down on Hollywood. If I had a dollar for every American who simply would like to see these entertainers be entertainers rather than political commentators, my fiance and I, both my children, and a more than a few trusted friends could all retire very comfortably. 

It's one thing to use your celebrity and bully pulpit that goes with it to spout political views that nobody wants to hear. It's another to cry foul and demand that it's unfair that people do not want to take your views seriously.

74 comments:

KD, Money did not Buy the US Election said...

Talk about the poster Hag for Fake News. She wins.

They are now the Victims of the Hillary Clinton $1 Billion Dollar loss. They expected a Yuge ROI, now they are crying to the world.

Roger Amick said...

#Trump mouthpiece

#Coldheartedtruthnomore

You are echoing the Tweet by your hero.

January 20,2017

торжественно клянусь, что буду добросовестно исполнять должность президента Соединенных Штатов, и воля к лучшей из моей способности, сохранять, защищать и защищать Конституцию Соединенных Штатов. Да поможет мне Бог.

Roger Amick said...

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Meryl Streep, one of the most over-rated actresses in Hollywood, doesn't know me but attacked last night at the Golden Globes. She is a.....
3:27 AM - 9 Jan 2017
14,654 14,654 Retweets 38,692 38,692 likes

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Hillary flunky who lost big. For the 100th time, I never "mocked" a disabled reporter (would never do that) but simply showed him.......
3:36 AM - 9 Jan 2017
8,606 8,606 Retweets

He did mock the handicapped reporter.

Roger Amick said...

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
"groveling" when he totally changed a 16 year old story that he had written in order to make me look bad. Just more very dishonest media!
3:43 AM - 9 Jan 2017
7,005 7,005 Retweets 25,020 25,020 likes

opie said...


He did mock the handicapped reporter.

But he denies he did in spite of the visual evidence Kinda like rat mocking the D's for not complaining about the israeli's rather than holding the russians accountable for hacking.

opie said...

Sure is a thin skinned wimp with small hands.....LOL

Loretta Russo said...

LOL. I hope there are MORE Hollywood videos, MORE "words of wisdom" from liberal lunatics.

Cheap entertainment is hard to come by these days.

caliphate4vr said...

FLASHBACK: Meryl Streep gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation at the 2003 Oscars

opie said...

Here's a good video for you to watch and comment on, Flashback to the campaign, Loretta

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hEQKqFgfAg

Loretta Russo said...

"FLASHBACK: Meryl Streep gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation at the 2003 Oscars"

NOT surprised.

opie said...

Say things enough times and the feeble minded will accept them. See video @ 9:13. Amazing the lies he perpetrates, can't even be honest what the intel report said. But Streep is the villain while donnie tweets his BS. LOL

But the Republican’s focus Monday morning appeared to be devoted to a counter-assault against Hollywood. He decried Meryl Streep as a disgruntled “Hillary lover” both on Twitter and in an interview with the New York Times after the actress used a Golden Globes speech Sunday to condemn his campaign-trail comments about a reporter with a congenital condition.


“I was never mocking anyone,” Trump told the Times. “I was calling into question a reporter who had gotten nervous because he had changed his story . … People keep saying I intended to mock the reporter’s disability, as if Meryl Streep and others could read my mind, and I did no such thing.”

C.H. Truth said...

Gee Roger...

Let's not even consider that I wrote this without ever looking at Donald Trump's twitter feed on the subject...

I have held the position that celebrities should keep their political opinions to themselves ever since celebrities have been spouting political opinions...

I don't need Donald Trump to tell me how to think.


But it's an interesting observation to realize that your personal assumption comes from the viewpoint that politicians should form an individual's political opinion. Which explains why you so seldom think for yourself, and seemingly always need to figure out which side your politicians are, before creating a personal opinion.

Please do not project "your" version of opinion making on other people. We are not all sheep like you.

C.H. Truth said...

Opie...

I couldn't care less about the political opinions of the celebrity or how Donald Trump reacted to it. Unlike you, I don't consider being on television as making someone smarter or more entitled to have their political views heard.

I will respect them for their success, as that generally shows talent, ability and a level of commitment that comes with success in all areas. But being a good actor or a great musician doesn't necessarily make you an expert on running a Government. If the truly want to make a difference, I know one celebrity who ran for office (President in fact) and actually won his election. Otherwise, I don't need George Clooney to act like Celebrities are somehow "ahead of the curve" on political issues. The difference is that they can focus on "issues" that most people don't care about, because most people have more personal issues to deal with.

But the bottom line:

My post was very specific to the concept that the celebrity class now feels slighted and attacked because people do not take their opinions seriously...

This has nothing to do with what their opinions were or how Donald Trump reacted to them.



Roger Amick said...

Celebrities can say what they want.

You were too much like Trump to believe that you are didn't look for what to say.

Trump and you made fools of yourself.

Roger Amick said...

Mocking the reporter.

https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=PX9reO3QnUA"https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=PX9reO3QnUA

opie said...

Blogger C.H. Truth said...
Opie...

I couldn't care less about the political opinions of the celebrity or how Donald Trump reacted to it

LOL For such meaningless person to get a such a reaction from the guy whose finger is on the button should be a major concern, For me, I could give a crap what meryl said, but she baited the typical reaction from a thin skinned megalomaniac to go on a twitter tirade. Very mature if you ask me. And we should all worry. It has everything to do how donnie reacted, the next leader of the free world worried about what an actress calls him. Sad ain't it. and worrisome except to you, LO

Roger Amick said...

"being a celebrity apprentice host or a successful business owner built from a $200 million inheritance doesn't necessarily make you an expert on running a Government."

#Coldheartedtruthnomore

You didn't apply the same standard.

If you were old enough, I doubt that you would have called out Ronald Reagan, before he ran for office, when he said that Medicare would destroy the best medical care in the world.


Roger Amick said...

Opie, the (R) is permitted to say anything.

Yeah, a guy who flipped out over the comments by an actress, should not be allowed near the red button.

But it's ok with our esteemed host (R)

Commonsense said...

LOL. I hope there are MORE Hollywood videos, MORE "words of wisdom" from liberal lunatics.

The next four years of liberal derangement is going to be awesome.

opie said...

The next four years of liberal derangement is going to be awesome.

With trump tweeting, most won't need to look far for subjects to pick on. Worried what an actress said and arnolds poor ratings are just the tip of things to come. LOL Trump will do himself without much help.

Commonsense said...

I think the most amusing thing is that the Hollywood establishment continue to be mystified by the low ratings of their awards shows.

opie said...

But it's ok with our esteemed host (R)

Ya think???? At least he has knocked off his inane support that his hockey friend thinks there is no proof of the russian hack. Even trump stopped talking about it as has our R host. Again, the CIA has a lot of stuff not released that finally shut the entertainer up. So he jumps at Streep, a failed actress as his new target. Gonna be a lot of giggles with this monkey in charge.

opie said...

I think the most amusing thing is that the Hollywood establishment continue to be mystified by the low ratings of their awards shows"

I find it amusing that you think that means something, LOL

Commonsense said...

Heh, I don't care but ratings mean something to the people in Hollywood.

Willful stupidity is no way to go through life boy.

Roger Amick said...

The past eight years of conservative derangement was awesome.

Mensa was a prime example of total derangement.

Roger Amick said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Loretta Russo said...

"e next four years of liberal derangement is going to be awesome."

Loving it AND CH destroying the drunkard and his little sidekick doper, Opie.

rrb said...

Anonymous caliphate4vr said...
FLASHBACK: Meryl Streep gave Roman Polanski a standing ovation at the 2003 Oscars
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

liberals in general and hollywood liberals in particular have always had a soft spot in their hearts for murderous dictators and child molesters.

Roger Amick said...

Robert Barker: They are at it big time in the Republican sick circles of repression. Here is the week in review from a friend.The federal week in review:
1. Trump fires all Ambassadors and Special Envoys, ordering them out by inauguration day.
2. House brings back the Holman rule allowing them to reduce an individual civil service, SES positions, or political appointee's salary to $1, effectively firing them by amendment to any piece of legislation. We now know why they wanted names and positions of people in Energy and State.
3. Senate schedules 6 simultaneous hearings on cabinet nominees and triple-books those hearings with Trump's first press conference in months and an ACA budget vote, effectively preventing any concentrated coverage or protest.
4. House GOP expressly forbids the Congressional Budget Office from reporting or tracking ANY costs related to the repeal of the ACA.
5. Trump continues to throw the intelligence community under the bus to protect Putin, despite the growing mountain of evidence that the Russians deliberately interfered in our election.
6. Trump breaks a central campaign promise to make Mexico pay for the wall by asking Congress (in other words, us, the taxpayers) to pay for it.
7. Trump threatens Toyota over a new plant that was never coming to the US nor will take jobs out of the US.
8. House passes the REINS act, giving them veto power over any rules enacted by any federal agency or department--for example, FDA or EPA bans a drug or pesticide, Congress can overrule based on lobbyists not science. Don't like that endangered species designation, Congress kills it.,

And our esteemed host is more worried about a celebrity.

opie said...

Loretta Russo said...
"e next four years of liberal derangement is going to be awesome."

Loving it AND CH destroying the drunkard and his little sidekick doper,

LOL loretta. Such a hurtful comment that is your whole pathetic, sad life, if that's what you call it.

rrb said...

My post was very specific to the concept that the celebrity class now feels slighted and attacked because people do not take their opinions seriously...
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

i think they're starting to panic.

the fly-over state morons that streep et. al. purports to despise for being stupid and bigoted are the same folks she relies upon to fill her purse with box office $$$.

that might dawn on them at some point.

and when they produce movies about their favorite liberal issue of the day, they flop at the box office:


Movie goers weren’t too interested in “Miss Sloane,” a film that explores the gun control debate from the perspective of a lawyer who is lobbying for universal background checks for gun ownership. Still, the film’s leading lady, Jessica Chastain, landed a Best Actress Golden Globe nomination for the poorly received flick.

The film, which premiered in select cities on Thanksgiving, hit more theaters this past weekend, and it fizzled in its wide expansion, earning $1.9 million from 1,648 locations.

According to Deadline, “Miss Sloane” cost $13 million to produce. It currently has a score of 69 percent on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes.

The movie was projected to earn a paltry $5 million at the box office, according to the Los Angeles Times, but so far it’s fallen short.

In the film, Elizabeth, played by Chastain, leaves her top firm for the opposition when a powerful gun group asks her to devise messaging to turn women against background checks for gun ownership. Chastain is portrayed fighting for the underdogs, using everything at her disposal to try to ensure that the background check bill passes.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/12/13/gun-control-flick-miss-sloane-flops-at-box-office-but-snags-golden-globe-nod.html

opie said...

mean something to the people in Hollywood

Really, Making shit up does not make them fact. LOL!!!!

Seems to me since you claim the ratings sucked for awards show, why are you still talking about them and why is trump acting like loretta with name calling???????

rrb said...



hey rog, you forgot your "crooks and liars" link:

http://crooksandliars.com/2017/01/sunday-morning-bobblehead-thread-1

and your number 4 is a lie.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52351

gee, it's almost like you can't formulate an opinion without facebook telling you what to think.

Loretta Russo said...

Plagiarized spam.

Loretta Russo said...

LOL

Loretta Russo said...

"liberals in general and hollywood liberals in particular have always had a soft spot in their hearts for murderous dictators and child molesters."

....and incest.

rrb said...

Roger Amick said...
Mocking the reporter.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


was that "reporter" a major league asshole like like the NYTs' adam clymer?


HA!

opie said...

Republicans in general will overlook lying, cheating and trickery to get what they want. Like McConnell said, Dems should do everything to approve the nominees as Mitch made up that the POTUS has no business appointing a judge in the last year of his term. Now he warns dems to toe the line or else. Your hypocrisy know no bounds, loretta.

opie said...


was that "reporter" a major league asshole like like the NYTs' adam climber?

No more like Steve Bannon the king of fake headlines, BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!

rrb said...

Commonsense said...
I think the most amusing thing is that the Hollywood establishment continue to be mystified by the low ratings of their awards shows.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

the shows have become nothing but meetings for their mutual admiration society. hence the mindless babble about trump. when every single person in the room agrees with you, you bask in the echo and believe yourself important.

kind of like roger on the 'occupy democrats!!!11!' facebook page.

opie said...

Jessica Chastain, landed a Best Actress Golden Globe nomination for the poorly received flick.


Another rat fact that means nothing.

Commonsense said...

Yes, they really don't have a clue do they?

rrb said...

Commonsense said...
Yes, they really don't have a clue do they?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

they consider themselves to be brilliant. and then they insult half of their potential audience.

and when viewership falls through the floor, they'll have no idea why.

opie said...

A quick recap of the liar in chief's comments about the mocked reporter....But you still bow in awe to the faker of all fakers......

Readers may recall that the controversy started in November when Trump, without any evidence, asserted this claim about the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks: “I watched when the World Trade Center came tumbling down. And I watched in Jersey City, New Jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was coming down. Thousands of people were cheering.”

He quickly earned Four Pinocchios for that claim, and yet stuck to it, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that he was wrong.

Now, let’s go back to the recent rally in Colorado Springs, going through his explanation in detail:

“I said, ‘dancing, rooftops, street, whatever.’ And we couldn’t find too much stuff confirming what I said.”

That’s an interesting admission by Trump, in that he concedes his campaign was scrambling for some scrap of evidence that what he said was right. In other words, Trump mouthed off, and the campaign was having trouble confirming his remarks.

“All of suddenly someone comes up with an article and the article is written by this guy who said he met me many, many years ago. And the article is a great article for me. It talked about dancing, all the things. And I said, ‘here’s an article.’ I said I think he was with The Washington Post when he wrote the article. And he wrote this article. And it was great and I said here’s the article.”

The article, which appeared on Page 6 of The Washington Post on Sept. 18, 2001, described FBI probes in northern New Jersey in the wake of the attacks. In the 15th paragraph, it said that “law enforcement authorities detained and questioned a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops while they watched the devastation on the other side of the river.” (No mention of dancing, by the way.)

“And it really shut a lot of people up. It was pretty much on point, not 100 percent, but pretty much.”

Nope, not a single fact checker found this article to be significant. The language in no way confirms Trump’s claim of watching on television celebrations of “thousands” of Muslims. “Allegedly” indicates there is no video footage or other proof that celebrations actually took place.

“The author of this article was this guy. And the press started calling him. They are calling him a lot. And obviously the other side of things started calling him also, saying ‘this article is not good, because this is sort of confirming what Trump is saying. They were dancing, they were happy. This is not good.’ So all of the sudden, the guy — I think the article was almost 15 years old — he starts changing the article, that he made a mistake, he this, he that.”

This is total fantasy, especially the suggestion that the Clinton campaign was upset and somehow got to Kovaleski and made him change his story.

We’ve checked the records and Kovaleski conducted no on-camera interviews at the time. He simply gave the same statement to every news organization, including The Fact Checker: “I certainly do not remember anyone saying that thousands or even hundreds of people were celebrating. That was not the case, as best as I can remember. The rest of the 4 nose story below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/08/02/donald-trumps-revisionist-history-of-mocking-a-disabled-reporter/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.5c499f097885

opie said...

hence the mindless babble about trump. when every single person in the room agrees with you,

LOL I guess chachi and Ted nugent weren't invited......LOL

rrb said...


hey rog!

you're really killin' it over there on the legacy blog. your posts can't draw comments let alone flies, and page views are down to 383.

heckuva job, alky.

Loretta Russo said...

LMAO!

Stupid Opie posts an article from August, which has long been debunked, lol.

opie said...

Debunked how Loretta please provide what was wrong, it sure would help. Did the facts they cover change or are you just too stupid to comprehend what trump did, mocking a disabled person which you think is fine. The only laugh, once again, is on you loretta, the trump adorer. Idiot.

rrb said...


"Obama advanced an agenda to the left of that shared by most past presidents. Obamacare, the Benghazi catastrophe, the Iran deal, his strange stance toward radical Islam, and the Bergdahl swap were unpopular measures that required politically-driven recalibrations to escape American scrutiny.

Second, Obama’s team believes that the goals of fairness and egalitarianism more than justify the means of dissimulation by more sophisticated elites. Thus Gruber (“the stupidity of the American voter”) and Rhodes (“They literally know nothing”) employ deception on our behalf. Central to this worldview is that the American people are naive and easily manipulated, and thus need to be brought up to speed by a paternal administration that knows what is best for its vulnerable and clueless citizenry.

Such condescension is also why the administration never believes it has done anything wrong by hiding the facts of these controversies. Its players believe that because they did it all for us, the ensuing distasteful means will be forgotten once we finally progress enough to appreciate their enlightened ends."

--Victor Davis Hanson

rrb said...



that iran nuke deal just keeps getting better:


VIENNA (AP) — Iran is to receive a huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia to compensate it for exporting tons of reactor coolant, diplomats say, in a move approved by the outgoing U.S. administration and other governments seeking to keep Tehran committed to a landmark nuclear pact.

Two senior diplomats said the transfer recently agreed by the U.S. and five other world powers that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran foresees delivery of 116 metric tons (nearly 130 tons) of natural uranium. U.N. Security Council approval is needed but a formality, considering five of those powers are permanent Security Council members, they said.

https://apnews.com/db5a8d6cad764c208322939ed84a0d49

opie said...

--Victor Davis Hanson

Elitist hack.

opie said...

Still waiting for Loretta's info debunking of the trump lies. Once again, we only have her word, which is about as good as trumps.....ZERO.

Loretta Russo said...

"Victor Davis Hanson"

One of the smartest men ever.

rrb said...



“Every time I hear any of the Democratic senators, including my own boss, talk about diversity, I cringe, because it’s all one big lie,” one black staffer told the newspaper. “That they’ve been allowed to enjoy this reputation as a party that values diversity, while doing next to nothing of substance to align their actions with their words, is expert-level deception.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/01/06/under-pressure-schumer-wants-senate-democrats-to-adopt-the-rooney-rule-for-staff-hires/?utm_term=.a3c3cda5e3a4

opie said...

One of the smartest men ever.

When compared to rat and menstral child. LOL.... Still looking for the debunked data you claimed before, or does that exist only in your empty head?????

Loretta Russo said...

LOL.....

"Obama’s Imperial Presidency, and Now We’ve Got Trump Rex"

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/09/thanks-liberals-you-applauded-obama-s-imperial-presidency-and-now-we-ve-got-trump-rex.html?source=TDB&via=FB_Page

rrb said...

Anonymous opie said...
Still waiting for Loretta's info debunking of the trump lies.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


hold your breath.

C.H. Truth said...

You were too much like Trump to believe that you are didn't look for what to say.

So Roger... you are going to actually try to suggest that my opinion about sports figures, actors, and musicians keeping their collective mouths shut about politics... is a new thing for me, and that I got it from Donald Trump?

Have you not been paying "any" attention to my writings on this subject pretty much since I have been blogging? I remember writing about this very subject back when Bush was President, and Al Gore was leading the celebrity charge regarding "carbon footprints".

You really are knee-jerk in your thinking, friend. You should always take a time out using your deep breathing techniques before you react.

C.H. Truth said...

"being a celebrity apprentice host or a successful business owner built from a $200 million inheritance doesn't necessarily make you an expert on running a Government."

Nope. Neither does being a community organizer like our President, or a SNL comedian like my current Senator. But like Franken, Trump decided to actually run for something.

And the skills it takes to run a multi-billion dollar enterprise is more relevant than the skills it takes to be an actor, or to cover a wide receiver in the NFL.

rrb said...

You should always take a time out using your deep breathing techniques before you react.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

or i can just show up. then he scurries like a cockroach when you hit the light switch.

Loretta Russo said...

He IS a cockroach.

Roger Amick said...

Your two Democratic Senators are outstanding.

McConnell is a typical hypothetical Republican. He refused to even hold hearings for the Obama SCOTUS nominee.

After Democratic caucus would block any nominee, he said that this was unamerican and the voters would hold them accountable.

This was your comment with different names. "being a celebrity apprentice host or a successful business owner built from a $200 million inheritance doesn't necessarily make you an expert on running a Government."

You almost agreed that Trump wasn't qualified by your standard, but you just couldn't bring yourself to admit it.
#Coldheartedtruthnomore

Commonsense said...

Hypothetical? McConnell seems real enough.

rrb said...



One quick observation: If Putin thought helping Trump win the election would give him the weakest possible opponent, he would not be alone in his assessment: Hillary Clinton thought the exact same thing. Team Clinton tried to help Trump win the GOP nomination race because they thought he would be the weakest possible opponent in the general.

http://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/01/06/what-vladimir-putin-and-hillary-clinton-have-in-common/

rrb said...

Blogger Commonsense said...
Hypothetical? McConnell seems real enough.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

and consistent.

he simply refused to give skeets the chance to fuck the nation for at least a generation.

that's what i love the most about the GOP/ trump victory. in the aggregate, the benefits to this victory are almost too numerous to count.

rrb said...

McConnell is a typical hypothetical Republican.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

nothing hypothetical about him. he's GOP thru and thru.

rrb said...

According to a new poll, a large majority of Americans say it is important to appoint Supreme Court justices who will interpret the Constitution as it was originally written.

"Most Americans value the freedoms enumerated in the Constitution and its Bill of Rights, and therefore see as an immediate priority the appointment of justices to the Supreme Court who will interpret the document as written," said Carl A. Anderson, Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus, who commissioned the poll.

Eighty percent of Americans described it as an "immediate priority" or at least an "important" one to appoint justices to the Supreme Court who will preserve the original meaning of the Constitution, according to a poll conducted by Marist and sponsored by the Knights of Columbus.

This emphasis on appointing originalist Supreme Court justices persisted across partisan lines. Fifty-three percent of independents, 80 percent of Republicans, and even 42 percent of Democrats described this goal as an "immediate priority." Overall, 56 percent of Americans described it that way.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/01/09/most-americans-want-supreme-court-to-keep-original-meaning-of-constitution/



skeets has packed enough hacks onto the court. americans want another scalia. not some CPUSA/ACLU flunkie in a che` t-shirt.

rrb said...



U Chicago is now paying for bullshit. $500 to be exact:

http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/30621/


KD, said...

The next four years of liberal derangement is going to be awesome." CS

Yep, look at how it has been for the (RIP) Jane, Opium and HB.

CHT is right, she is pissed that over a $1 billion (Make it Rain) was spent on Hillary Clinton/Obama's 3rd Term and THEY lost.

Hillary had it all, she had ALL the Celeb's, She had all the cash, she had the ground game, the organization , and her ace in the hole, she Had Obama.

And no ROI.

Did Hilary's coat tails add more Seats in the US Senate, US House or State House's.


I heard that Obama blamed RUSH (HB you know him the guy that is not longer in Talk Radio) for Hillary Losing, because as the ONE said it "filters".

Dear President, you can learn from the incoming president, don't want anyone to miss your point, Tweet it.

KD, said...

that's what i love the most about the GOP/ trump victory. in the aggregate, the benefits to this victory are almost too numerous to count." RRB

I agree and then there is the coming victories that we have to give thanks to Senate Majority Leader Harry Ried, and the Ried Rule.

51 votes and things sail thru.

KD, Liberals get Louder, Thank God said...

HB, you have it wrong, all of us here want you loons on the left to be ever louder, tell us ever more and protest everywhere.
What ever happened to Occupy WallStreet, was it purely Political?
What will happen to BLM was it too , purely Political?



Are you still fighting to get the care from the Specialist for you wife, and that World Class UNION Health Care you have, for Life?

C.H. Truth said...

You almost agreed that Trump wasn't qualified by your standard, but you just couldn't bring yourself to admit it. #Coldheartedtruthnomore

I would offer that "technically" practically everyone but "realistically" hardly anyone is qualified to be President.

Certainly the American Heartland did not think Hillary Clinton was qualified to be President. I guess not being able to keep State secrets or your own Personal campaign emails from being hacked by a foreign entity is sort of disqualifying. At least more disqualifying, than simply having a vagina made her qualified.

opie said...

U Chicago is now paying for bullshit. $500 to be exact:

BFD!!! Busch spent a couple of trillion in Iraq and we are still paying. Idiot

opie said...

Loretta Russo said...
He IS a cockroach.

Come on debunked......how was the WP debunked, or you just make crap up???