The Justice Department is refusing to reveal details of the process that led up to former FBI Director Robert Mueller being granted an ethics waiver to serve as special counsel investigating the Trump campaign's alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election.
In response to a POLITICO Freedom of Information Act request, the agency released a one-sentence memo Friday confirming that Mueller was granted a conflict-of-interest waiver in order to assume the politically-sensitive post.
Mueller, the FBI, and others are already being accused of gestapo style politically motivated smear of Donald Trump and his Administration. How could knowing the full truth in all of this be any worse than the allegations?
WIFE OF DEMOTED DOJ OFFICIAL WORKED FOR FUSION GPS
A senior Justice Department official demoted last week for concealing his meetings with the men behind the anti-Trump “dossier” had even closer ties to Fusion GPS, the firm responsible for the incendiary document, than have been disclosed, Fox News has confirmed: The official’s wife worked for Fusion GPS during the 2016 election.
Contacted by Fox News, investigators for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) confirmed that Nellie H. Ohr, wife of the demoted official, Bruce G. Ohr, worked for the opposition research firm last year. The precise nature of Mrs. Ohr’s duties – including whether she worked on the dossier – remains unclear but a review of her published works available online reveals Mrs. Ohr has written extensively on Russia-related subjects. HPSCI staff confirmed to Fox News that she was paid by Fusion GPS through the summer and fall of 2016.
You can't make this shit up.
112 comments:
This whole thing stinks
geezus. the jokes write themselves these days. mueller is so compromised he needed an ethics waiver to run this sham of an investigation.
Contacted by Fox News
LOL again....
One of these stories is from Politico - another from FOX News.
They involve things like FOIA requests.
IT GETS WIERDER AND WIERDER
________________________________
A month after Hillary Clinton hired Fusion GPS (April 2016) to sub-contract retired British MI6 agent Christopher Steele to write the opposition research report “the Trump Russia Dossier”, Fusion GPS employee Nellie Ohr applied for a HAM radio license (May 23rd 2016); a communication tool that would allow Nellie Ohr and Christopher Steele the ability to communicate outside the normal risk of communication intercepts.
Keeping in mind, both Bruce and Nellie Ohr’s subject matter skill-set within the DOJ would provide them with a comprehensive understanding of how to network and communicate with international actors outside the traditional risk of communication intercepts. In short, Mrs. Nelli Ohr would know that using HAM radio frequencies would be a way to avoid the risk of U.S. intelligence intercepts on her communications.
The Clinton Campaign hired Fusion GPS in April 2016. Fusion GPS then sub-contracted retired British Intel MI6 agent Christopher Steele to write the Russian Dossier. A month later, May 23rd 2016, Fusion GPS employee Nellie Ohr gets HAM radio license.
So are we to believe it’s COINCIDENTAL? All of a sudden, a 60(ish)-year-old woman decides to use a HAM radio the month after contracting with Christopher Steele for a Russian opposition research dossier on Donald Trump?
So, this shadowy spook who has been spying most recently on international organized crime syndicates, and who is helping use the NSA surveillance capabilities against the Trump campaign, resorts to an obsolete technology dating from a century ago to communicate and not be captured by the very surveillance system they are subverting.
That is evidence of intent. Unless Mrs. Ohr can point to a history of fascination with ham radio – maybe she built a Heathkit rig in the 1960s or 70s? – this resort to radio looks like tradecraft – the stuff of spies.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/12/fusion_gps_dossier_cabal_was_using_spy_tradecraft_to_evade_leaving_electronic_footprints_for_nsa_surveillance.html
__________________________________
Maybe she was just trying to get a "resistance" badge
This "independent" investigation has stunk from the gitgo.
And melodies' skill set was being a mail order bride,,,,,yep, those Ohr's ae guilty as charged....
Nina Burleigh,Newsweek 3 hours ago
In the year since Donald Trump was elected president on a promise to “drain the swamp” of Washington’s corruption, Americans have become more, not less, convinced that Washington is corrupt, and that the White House is the most corrupt institution in U.S. government.
A new public opinion poll conducted over the past two months found that Americans don’t believe that Trump is cleaning up the government. In fact, the opposite is true: 58 percent of people surveyed say the level of corruption has risen in the past 12 months, up from 34 percent who said the same in January 2016.
And more Americans put the blame at the top: 44 percent now believe that most or all of the officials in the Office of the President are corrupt—up from 36 percent last year, and worse than perceptions of Congress (38 percent of Americans believe Congress is the most corrupt institution).
Lets toss hillary under the bus again.....LOL
Given the public opinion poll was not named, I'll assume she just made it up in her head.
But I'll give them this, the corruption in Washington was far deeper and more pervasive than even Trump imagine.
It may take more than two-terms to root it out.
I woke up to see that the President wants another special investigation into the existing special investigation. I saw it on one of my alerts and logged into Trumpism stage four mentality blog. And what did I see?
Exactly what I expected.
This is like a time machine that is taking us back to 1974 and the Watergate investigation.
As usual the real question is quite simple.
"What did he know and when did he know it?"
I'm fully expecting a Saturday Night Massacre.
On top of this, we get an unnamed Justice department source from Faux News, so of course this isn't Fake News because it came from Fox News.
The real fact news is that some people, including the wife of an investor can exercise their Constitutional right to express their views on the President doesn't necessarily mean that they cannot conduct an honest investigation. The decision to demote the justice department doesn't mean that the entire department of justice is biased.
I read this and yup. I knew it. You should apply to be the press secretary.
gloria allred and the mainstream media had better hurry up and get those trump accusers before congress. the donks need a diversion.
Yes, you can make this shit up.
Good job.
Opie, sometimes he makes it too easy.
LOL
The real fact news is that some people, including the wife of an investor can exercise their Constitutional right to express their views on the President doesn't necessarily mean that they cannot conduct an honest investigation. The decision to demote the justice department doesn't mean that the entire department of justice is biased.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
huh?
huh?
A senior Justice Department official demoted last week for concealing his meetings with the men behind the anti-Trump “dossier” had even closer ties to Fusion GPS, the firm responsible for the incendiary document, than have been disclosed, Fox News has confirmed: The official’s wife worked for Fusion GPS during the 2016 election.
Learn how to read English.
menstrual you do know what the definition of "assume" or did you ignore that lesson in high school.????
BYRON YORK: Former top spy rethinks: Maybe we shouldn’t have attacked a new president.
“Let’s put ourselves in Donald Trump’s shoes,” Morell said to Glasser. “So what does he see? Right? He sees a former director of CIA and a former director of NSA, Mike Hayden … criticizing him and his policies. Right? And he would rightfully have said, ‘Huh, what’s going on with the intelligence guys?'”
“And then he sees a former acting director and deputy director of CIA criticizing him and endorsing his opponent,” Morell continued. “And then he gets his first intelligence briefing, after becoming the Republican nominee, and within 24 to 48 hours, there are leaks out of that that are critical of him and his then-national security adviser Mike Flynn.”
“And so, this stuff starts to build, right? And he must have said to himself, ‘What is it with these intelligence guys? Are they political?'”
The answer to that was simple: Yes, they were political. But the astonishing part of the Morell interview is his admission that at the time he did not stop to consider what was happening from Trump’s perspective, even as the leaks continued when Trump took office. “He must have thought, ‘Who are these guys?'” Morell said. “Are these guys out to get me? Is this a political organization?”
That this obviously foreseeable consequence wasn’t foreseen demonstrates that these “intelligence” guys aren’t very good at what they’re supposed to be good at. And it explains why their work product hasn’t been very good with regard to other countries, when they couldn’t even foresee an obvious result in their own.
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/283156/#respond
On top of that the "source" is a "Justice department source" which of course it's not Fake News because it came from Fox News.
Learn how to read English.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
this is english? pidgin english perhaps:
"The real fact news is that some people, including the wife of an investor can exercise their Constitutional right to express their views on the President doesn't necessarily mean that they cannot conduct an honest investigation. The decision to demote the justice department doesn't mean that the entire department of justice is biased."
you ain't worth a shit unless you copy and paste, alky.
pumpkin.com. Or pjmedia.com
Both are totally unbiased because rrb "thinks" they are. .
Blogger Roger Amick said...
On top of that the "source" is a "Justice department source" which of course it's not Fake News because it came from Fox News.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
you fucksticks have been totally reliant upon confidential and unnamed sources for a fucking year, and suddenly you have a problem with ONE.
H.B.L.
Kill Mueller's investigation for being the political hack job it is.
Suspend Robert Mueller's politically tainted investigation into Russia-Trump collusion
In a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, FBI Director Christopher Wray consistently deflected questions regarding these types of conflicts by deferring to ongoing investigations being conducted by the Justice Department’s inspector general. He also continued to stonewall on providing information on the FBI’s use of the Steele dossier and the FISA warrant it helped generate, citing vague national security concerns.
We are left with an appearance of an unacceptable degree of political prejudice and a troubling series of unanswered questions. It is dangerous to subject the office of the president to a gravely biased investigation undertaken with a reckless spirit. Should further evidence of untoward bias emerge, Americans may conclude that the justice system itself is illegitimate, with all that entails.
The most prudent move would be to suspend the special counsel investigation until the Justice Department inspector general’s office and other watchdogs can conclude their investigations into possible illegitimate or illegal actions taken by members of Mueller’s team. Then Congress must be given time to review the conclusions of the internal investigations as well as conclude their own ongoing inquiries.
The stakes are too high to allow a clique of politicized government agents to destroy the integrity of the investigative apparatus, and damage the office of the presidency.
and here's the original link to byron york's piece, alky:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-top-intel-official-rethinks-maybe-we-shouldnt-have-attacked-a-new-president/article/2643208?platform=hootsuite
I wrote my own comments. That is not a c/p. I wrote this.
"The real fact news is that some people, including the wife of an investor can exercise their Constitutional right to express their views on the President doesn't necessarily mean that they cannot conduct an honest investigation. The decision to demote the justice department doesn't mean that the entire department of justice is biased."
rrb is jealous of my ability to write in English.
The stakes are too high to allow a clique of politicized government agents to destroy the integrity of the investigative apparatus, and damage the office of the presidency.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
too late.
I never saw the story. Sorry Jimmy but yes I can write.
including the wife of an investor
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
who's the "investor" alky?
no shit you wrote it. it makes no fucking sense.
It's tempting to be sarcastic and rewrite the latest c/p comments from the blog bigot in #rrbenglish but it's not worth it.
Our host takes offence if I do something like that.
But repeating alky alky alky blah blah blah blah blah blah alky
1,794 days one day at a time my friend.
All sources menstral questioned but too lazy to look up...
www.newsweek.com/trump-flynn-kushner-ivanka-corruThe p…
"Wife of demoted Justice Department Worked For Fusion Gps" is the headline of the Faux News Fake News bullshit story.
The fact that you can't understand it is not surprising. The Justice Department official was obviously an investor because he was demoted for a conflict of interest on the ongoing investigation.
Just in: "WASHINGTON — Special counsel Robert Mueller has produced hundreds of thousands of documents, copied 36 electronic devices and 2,000 “hot” documents in the government’s case against Paul Manafort and Rick Gates.
Mueller’s investigators made copies of cell phones and hard drives and submitted 15 search warrants and other requests in their investigation of Trump’s former campaign chairman and his deputy."
The contents are not publicly available, but it's crystal clear that cell phones and hard drives reference data far beyond the over-simplified viewpoint presented here of "old" money-laundering by Trump officials that has "nothing to do with" the Trump campaign and administration.
"viewpoint presented here of "old" money-laundering by Trump officials that has "nothing to do with" the Trump campaign and administration."
Mueller has had the "data" from the cell phones for months, and STILL all we have are charges for something done years ago...
Okie dokie.
*cell phones and hard drives
"The real fact news is that some people, including the wife of an investor can exercise their Constitutional right to express their views on the President doesn't necessarily mean that they cannot conduct an honest investigation. The decision to demote the justice department doesn't mean that the entire department of justice is biased."
Sure, it doesn't necessarily mean that they cannot conduct and honest investigation.
But in an investigation such as this one, the optics are important. When there are blatant situations that appear to be conflict or even blatantly partisan, then why wouldn't you want to avoid them at all costs?
You already are dealing with questions about the dossier. If it turns out that FICA warrants were obtained due to unfounded paid opposition research, then you have serious problems. If people who were responsible for and pushing the dossier have connections to the Mueller investigation itself, then you have legitimate reasons to question the objectivity.
When you include these people on the payroll (like it or not) does not lend itself to the appearance of an objective non-political open minded investigation.
It's not just a matter of whether or not it's "possible" for people who might be investigated themselves to hold an honest investigation...
It's a question of coming to a answer that EVERYONE can agree is based on objective conclusions from objective investigators, based on objective and verifiable facts.
Having an investigation made up of investigators who half the country doesn't trust to provide the other half with an answer that they want to hear, based on subjective opinions, dubious research, and less than proven assertions will ultimately prove to be more harm than help.
Speaking of ethics?
The President has been saying that every single one of the women accusing him of sexual harassment. Well...
Melissa Young
Melissa Young was also offered as an “eyewitness” who disputes the account of Samantha Holvey. The White House list describes Young as someone who “Also Competed In The 2005 Miss USA Pageant.”
But Holvey was not a contestant in the 2005 Miss USA pageant. In fact, Holvey represented North Carolina in the 2006 Miss USA Pageant, while Young represented Wisconsin in the 2005 Miss USA Pageant. (A different contestant named Chelsea Cooley represented North Carolina in 2005; she won.)
An inquiry to the White House press office about this apparent error was not immediately returned.
Young has not publicly commented on Holvey’s account. She says that Trump was kind to her several years later when she had a blood clot that sent her to the hospital. Young described Trump as a “gentleman.”
https://thinkprogress.org/eyewitnesses-white-house-exonerate-trump-ce8792f64364/
CH, thank you for a calm and thoughtful response.
It seems that the only thing that matters in this very important investigation to you, is that how the public perception feels good about this.
"Having an investigation made up of investigators who half the country doesn't trust to provide the other half with an answer that they want to hear, based on subjective opinions, dubious research, and less than proven assertions will ultimately prove to be more harm than help."
I see it that how the people feel about this investigation is complete does not matter. The President has been calling for an investigation into the investigation. We have to let the investigation to reach it's conclusion no matter which way it turns out.
I keep remembering Watergate. Nixon relentlessly tried to claim that the investigation was biased and fired the investor. I expect to see a "You're fired" 5:30AM tweet.
But again we should let it continue and if it is perceived as unfair or biased we can see what happens.
Sen warren called another Democrat female US Senator a "SLUT"
Sen Gilley brat , lol. A Slut
Holvey set off a storm of amused tweets when she told Kelly she was "naked under her robe".
"STILL all we have are charges for something done years ago..."
The July 16th 2017 meeting isn't years ago.
This covers older and current affairs.
She looks slutty. But let's go to our blog man whore Alky in Senator Gillibrand slutty?
The appearance of K'putz sent the discussions into the swamp.
Adios mooing lover.
Alkylation is incurable.
Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky Alky
Adios amigo.
Roger -
If people have been demoted, or removed from the investigation for the reasons that have been uncovered, then I believe transparency is the key.
It's one thing to claim (as some have) that you have to have a bunch of Hillary Donors on the probe, because everyone in D.C. is a Hillary donor. That could work, if by all other measures, those people seem fair, impartial, and objective.
But it's another deal all together when the guy running the probe is hiding the sort of partisan behavior that got someone kicked off the probe, when he appears to be covering for other actions, when there appears to be conflicts of interests that were not disclosed, and when his boss (Deputy Director Rosenstein) is defying congressional subpoenas for information regarding some of this.
How are we supposed to "trust" these people, when they are blatantly hiding things, being all cloak and dagger, and not responding to subpoenas that would open up the entire deal to transparency?
"The July 16th 2017 meeting isn't years ago."
Learn to read...
"Mueller has had the "data" from the cell phones for months, and STILL all we have are charges for something done years ago..."
"The indictment contains 12 counts: conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, false and misleading FARA statements, false statements, and seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts."
Sen. Warren calling Sen. Gillibrand a "slut".
Did Senator al Franken actual resign his seat today?
How long after the Election today, IF Moore wins will Al Franken go to social media😥?
To be clear...
The idea that Mueller has hard drives and phone records is not "breaking news". He has had this information since raiding Manafort's residence in July. There is nothing "breaking" about that fact, and it's not "news".
It's just another attempt by someone in the media to light a fire under the conspiracy theorists who would be willing to believe in Santa Claus if it furthered their belief that Putin and Trump conspired to steal the election from Hillary.
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
5h
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
CH we are going to agree to disagree.
That's fine with me.
Do you have a Jew as lawyer?
Lol@HB.
Did you see the US Market continues to "Crash", Up.
Tell you what Roger, I will not call you alky as long as you don't call me kputz.
I know you have no self control.
CH we are going to agree to disagree.
How so, exactly?
Do you otherwise believe that everyone (including Republicans) believe that Mueller is running a fair and impartial probe, and that all of his investigators are also fair and impartial?
Or do you otherwise believe that whether or not Mueller's probe has credibility across the partisan divide is basically unimportant?
OT one comment and yes
Some
People
Care
Kidney doctor said that I am doing excellent. The members are exactly correct !
Some
People
Care"
Who?
Donald J. Trump
He manage to troll two buzzards with one tweet and cause the imminent mental breakdown of a morning show host.
Roger - your answer is a non-answer.
Obviously you cannot tell me that Republicans at this point trust Mueller (because they by and large do not). Whether you believe they should is irrelevant. It would be like me telling you that you should trust Trump. Obviously you are going to believe what you believe.
So that leaves an argument that it really doesn't matter if a probe like this is trusted by everyone. I think that's a dubious and quite self-centered argument to make. It's also a highly incorrect argument for a variety of reasons too lengthy to list.
But make no mistake. This was supposed to be a probe that would provide real answers about Russian involvement in the 2016 election. There is almost no chance of that happening at this point.
Ironically, the most likely event is that Mueller has to admit that there was no collusion... while attempting to make some argument that there was obstruction.
Even if Mueller provides the admission that they uncovered no evidence of collusion, you will not accept it. You are way too vested in that belief.
Likewise... Short of uncovering irrefutable evidence of a bribe, witness tampering, Presidential perjury, destruction of evidence (like deleting 30K emails or wiping a subpoenaed server), or something "other" than the fact that the President fired the FBI director.... Mueller's opinion about obstruction would not convince me of anything.
So what does it accomplish?
, and STILL all we have are charges for something done years ago...
And everything Mueller knows has to be summarized in the charge eh? It's not like he's looking for data to bring charges against anyone else.
Okie dokie.
Exactly what was the ethics waiver addressing?
Oh, we don't know. Right. But it has the word "ethics" in it so it must mean that Mueller is A HACK, conducting a PARTISAN WITCH HUNT. I can see where you're coming from.
And everything Mueller knows has to be summarized in the charge eh?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
not at all. he's free to bring those charges when he concludes the investigation in 2035.
"Exactly what was the ethics waiver addressing?
Oh, we don't know. Right. But it has the word "ethics" in it so it must mean that Mueller is A HACK, conducting a PARTISAN WITCH HUNT. I can see where you're coming from."
a better question is why aren't we allowed to know?
and at this point i consider mueller a candidate for the hack hall of fame. and the ethics waiver has nothing to do with it.
Easy enough to settle. Just make the waver public.
Republicans at this point trust Mueller (because they by and large do not)
Are you speaking for yourself or the entire nation? Seems it is the tea bag pubes like yourself who have a problem...The conflict of interest being pushed by you and Faux news is another example of trying to distract the discussion away from trump. Very impressive, CH....you should be ashamed of yourself with your lack of a moral compass.
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
trump's not wrong, alky. my junior senator is a lightweight, a hack, a liar, a poseur, and a corrupt flunky who won't make a move or say a word unless the partisan 'optics' are just right.
she campaigned with a fucking RAPIST for chrissakes. and then she had to just about take a fucking poll before asking for franken to step down.
she's an opportunistic fraud and a pathological liar. just like her boss chuckles the clown schemer.
Blogger KD said...
Sen. Warren calling Sen. Gellibrand a "slut".
Another lie by the goat putz
trump's not wrong, alky. my junior senator is a lightweight
T he real light weight is donnie and his infantile tweeting....He's got thiner skin than loretta!!! Thinks his shit smells like roses and everyone but he is wrong....typical weak kneed tyrant with an inferiority complex....Yep, he also does nothing but makes up his own alternate facts,, like millions of illegal votes, beaners streaming over the border and he's done wonders for the economy....LOLOLOL
The issue is that certain people are attempting to claim that the term "flunky" has some demeaning prostitute sort of meaning, when the word has nothing to do with any of that.
People just love to may anything and everything into an issue.
They haven't figured out that this is "exactly" what Trump wants. When you go trolling with someone like Trump, he will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
His tweet demanded that the left "jump"...
and Gillibrand and Goofy Elizabeth Warren asked how high!
I agree, make the waiver public.
I am on record here, multiple times, advocating that everything about the investigation should be made public. Whatever the Investigators may give up tactically, it would be a lower priority than having transparency and the attendant ultimate accountability to the American public.
The issue is that certain people are attempting to claim that the term "flunky" has some demeaning prostitute sort of meaning
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
not quite.
it's this part that lit the fuse on kirsten's tampon:
(and would do anything for them).
interestingly enough, gillibrand's own mother used to bang the albany mayor erastus corning. so i guess the apple didn't fall too far from the tree.
The issue is that certain people are attempting to claim that the term "flunky"
Maybe you should stop talking for everyone but yourself....I am sure you feel no one feels that calling you a flunky would just roll off your back...but, I for one think it is insulting since you have alluded that is what I am more than once. It is demeaning and thinking "she would do anything for a donation" is anything but a sexist demeaning comment to a sitting senator needs to come out of his coma.....Sad the only thing you do is defend trump and moore...Today is a reckoning for your party as a moore win is a big lose as is a moore loss...don't get much better than that!!!! BTW.....the relitigation of trump is starting in earnest as more women come public with trump indiscretions that were shrugged off last year....Ain't gonna happen again...LOLOLOL
gillibrand's own mother used to bang the albany mayor erastus
And trumps been married 3 times...so fucking what rat hole I'd be willing to bet your fidelity is about as good as kirsten's mother..
Madam oPie, I can not continue to educate you.
Kd the moronic goat putz posted....
can not continue to educate you.
You are correct since I already have far more education than you have....
You couldn't get laid in a women's prison with a handful of pardons.....asshole...
The fact news Wall Street Journal has an interesting opinion piece.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-long-war-on-donald-trump-1512774932?mod=fbads&nan_pid=1861296284&ad_id=6636272
Your opinion is all it is. I don't believe anything except that excuses every single goddamn thing the President and his staff did. This is it.
But make no mistake. This was supposed to be a probe that would provide real answers about Russian involvement in the 2016 election. There is almost no chance of that happening at this point.
Ironically, the most likely event is that Mueller has to admit that there was no collusion... while attempting to make some argument that there was obstruction.
Even if Mueller provides the admission that they uncovered no evidence of collusion, you will not accept it. You are way too vested in that belief.
Hb, did you see the "Dow crashing" to new all time historic HIGH.
Footage shows Trump with some women accusers whom he claimed he ‘never met’
3 / 26
The Hill
Rebecca Savransky
2 hrs ago
Trump says accusations of sexual misconduct 'fabricated'
Videos and photos showing President Trump with some of the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct are resurfacing after Trump in a tweet Tuesday said his accusers are "women who I don't know and/or have never met."
"Despite thousands of hours wasted and many millions of dollars spent, the Democrats have been unable to show any collusion with Russia - so now they are moving on to the false accusations and fabricated stories of women who I don't know and/or have never met. FAKE NEWS!" Trump tweeted Tuesday.
People magazine published a photo later in the day showing Trump standing alongside Natasha Stoynoff, a former foreign correspondent for the magazine, while at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in 2005. People said that the photo was taken the same day that Stoynoff, in 2016, accused Trump of forcibly kissing her.
Another photo surfaced following Trump's tweet Tuesday showing him with another accuser, Jill Harth.
Harth, who did business with Trump and later dated him, last year accused him of groping her in the early 1990s. According to a New York Times column published last year, Harth filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997, but withdrew it when settling a separate lawsuit with Trump.
Another high-profile Trump accuser, Summer Zervos, was a contestant on NBC's "The Apprentice," which Trump hosted. The woman, who accused Trump of groping her in 2007, is seen in video sitting across a boardroom table from Trump on the show.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Tuesday afternoon that Trump's tweet earlier in the day was referring specifically to three other women who held a press conference the previous day about their accusations against Trump.
Hill Footage shows Trump with some accusers after he claimed he ‘never met’ women
Rachel Crooks, Samantha Holvey and Jessica Leeds called on Congress to investigate the claims against Trump at the Monday news conference.
Nearly 60 Democratic women in Congress also called on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee earlier this week to open an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump.
In a letter, 59 members of the Democratic Women's Working Group ask Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) to open an investigation into the matter after more than a dozen women have "publicly accused the President of sexual misconduct."
I'm Rev. James Boswell of Normal, Illinois.
I'm a sexual predator.
I'm a pedophile.
Footage shows Trump with some women accusers whom he claimed he ‘never met’
3 / 26
The Hill
Rebecca Savransky
2 hrs ago
Trump says accusations of sexual misconduct 'fabricated'
Videos and photos showing President Trump with some of the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct are resurfacing after Trump in a tweet Tuesday said his accusers are "women who I don't know and/or have never met."
"Despite thousands of hours wasted and many millions of dollars spent, the Democrats have been unable to show any collusion with Russia - so now they are moving on to the false accusations and fabricated stories of women who I don't know and/or have never met. FAKE NEWS!" Trump tweeted Tuesday.
People magazine published a photo later in the day showing Trump standing alongside Natasha Stoynoff, a former foreign correspondent for the magazine, while at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in 2005. People said that the photo was taken the same day that Stoynoff, in 2016, accused Trump of forcibly kissing her.
Another photo surfaced following Trump's tweet Tuesday showing him with another accuser, Jill Harth.
Harth, who did business with Trump and later dated him, last year accused him of groping her in the early 1990s. According to a New York Times column published last year, Harth filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997, but withdrew it when settling a separate lawsuit with Trump.
Another high-profile Trump accuser, Summer Zervos, was a contestant on NBC's "The Apprentice," which Trump hosted. The woman, who accused Trump of groping her in 2007, is seen in video sitting across a boardroom table from Trump on the show.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Tuesday afternoon that Trump's tweet earlier in the day was referring specifically to three other women who held a press conference the previous day about their accusations against Trump.
Hill Footage shows Trump with some accusers after he claimed he ‘never met’ women
Rachel Crooks, Samantha Holvey and Jessica Leeds called on Congress to investigate the claims against Trump at the Monday news conference.
Nearly 60 Democratic women in Congress also called on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee earlier this week to open an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump.
In a letter, 59 members of the Democratic Women's Working Group ask Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) to open an investigation into the matter after more than a dozen women have "publicly accused the President of sexual misconduct."
Footage shows Trump with some women accusers whom he claimed he ‘never met’
3 / 26
The Hill
Rebecca Savransky
2 hrs ago
Trump says accusations of sexual misconduct 'fabricated'
Videos and photos showing President Trump with some of the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct are resurfacing after Trump in a tweet Tuesday said his accusers are "women who I don't know and/or have never met."
"Despite thousands of hours wasted and many millions of dollars spent, the Democrats have been unable to show any collusion with Russia - so now they are moving on to the false accusations and fabricated stories of women who I don't know and/or have never met. FAKE NEWS!" Trump tweeted Tuesday.
People magazine published a photo later in the day showing Trump standing alongside Natasha Stoynoff, a former foreign correspondent for the magazine, while at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in 2005. People said that the photo was taken the same day that Stoynoff, in 2016, accused Trump of forcibly kissing her.
Another photo surfaced following Trump's tweet Tuesday showing him with another accuser, Jill Harth.
Harth, who did business with Trump and later dated him, last year accused him of groping her in the early 1990s. According to a New York Times column published last year, Harth filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997, but withdrew it when settling a separate lawsuit with Trump.
Another high-profile Trump accuser, Summer Zervos, was a contestant on NBC's "The Apprentice," which Trump hosted. The woman, who accused Trump of groping her in 2007, is seen in video sitting across a boardroom table from Trump on the show.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Tuesday afternoon that Trump's tweet earlier in the day was referring specifically to three other women who held a press conference the previous day about their accusations against Trump.
Hill Footage shows Trump with some accusers after he claimed he ‘never met’ women
Rachel Crooks, Samantha Holvey and Jessica Leeds called on Congress to investigate the claims against Trump at the Monday news conference.
Nearly 60 Democratic women in Congress also called on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee earlier this week to open an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump.
In a letter, 59 members of the Democratic Women's Working Group ask Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) to open an investigation into the matter after more than a dozen women have "publicly accused the President of sexual misconduct."
Footage shows Trump with some women accusers whom he claimed he ‘never met’
3 / 26
The Hill
Rebecca Savransky
2 hrs ago
Trump says accusations of sexual misconduct 'fabricated'
Videos and photos showing President Trump with some of the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct are resurfacing after Trump in a tweet Tuesday said his accusers are "women who I don't know and/or have never met."
"Despite thousands of hours wasted and many millions of dollars spent, the Democrats have been unable to show any collusion with Russia - so now they are moving on to the false accusations and fabricated stories of women who I don't know and/or have never met. FAKE NEWS!" Trump tweeted Tuesday.
People magazine published a photo later in the day showing Trump standing alongside Natasha Stoynoff, a former foreign correspondent for the magazine, while at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in 2005. People said that the photo was taken the same day that Stoynoff, in 2016, accused Trump of forcibly kissing her.
Another photo surfaced following Trump's tweet Tuesday showing him with another accuser, Jill Harth.
Harth, who did business with Trump and later dated him, last year accused him of groping her in the early 1990s. According to a New York Times column published last year, Harth filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997, but withdrew it when settling a separate lawsuit with Trump.
Another high-profile Trump accuser, Summer Zervos, was a contestant on NBC's "The Apprentice," which Trump hosted. The woman, who accused Trump of groping her in 2007, is seen in video sitting across a boardroom table from Trump on the show.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Tuesday afternoon that Trump's tweet earlier in the day was referring specifically to three other women who held a press conference the previous day about their accusations against Trump.
Hill Footage shows Trump with some accusers after he claimed he ‘never met’ women
Rachel Crooks, Samantha Holvey and Jessica Leeds called on Congress to investigate the claims against Trump at the Monday news conference.
Nearly 60 Democratic women in Congress also called on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee earlier this week to open an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump.
In a letter, 59 members of the Democratic Women's Working Group ask Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) and ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) to open an investigation into the matter after more than a dozen women have "publicly accused the President of sexual misconduct."
Videos and photos showing President Trump with some of the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct are resurfacing after Trump in a tweet Tuesday said his accusers are "women who I don't know and/or have never met.
I'm pretty sure that Trump's supporters know that he's nothing more than a bullshitter (aka liar), but they just don't care. Water rolling off a duck's back.
WP, pukes on the kiddy table.
"I'm pretty sure that Trump's supporters know that he's nothing more than a bullshitter (aka liar), but they just don't care."
After eight years of a pathological lying, two-bit community organizer, Trump's a saint.
CA homeless cause largest fire in CA history. Bet they are illegals.
Ette, WP has found his place, it is the butt hurt election loser kiddy table.
HB, did you see that the "Dow Crashing" upward to a all time historic High.
Alabama Jones WINS, WOOOOT.
Early numbers are going for Jones!
CH open a Georgia post.
I would open up one on the Legacy, butt Jimmy's ass is disturbed.
Hb, always a dollar short.
I'm posting good shit on the "Competing Polls" post.
Jones 53 %
Moore 46 %
So does this mean Alabama voters are not (_________) @holes?
So I guess we're done with the Trump collusion stuff.
Never
# resisthillary2020
And so much for fox news credability in polling
Looks like Moore is going to win.
It will be more damaging to the Republicans than a Democratic victory.
HB, loser, talking loser talk.
Winning is always better.
It's too close to call. But it look like the pedophile may not win! Urban areas are coming in!
The pervert lost!
Does he know that Jones has a six year term?
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
7m7 minutes ago
Congratulations to Doug Jones on a hard fought victory. The write-in votes played a very big factor, but a win is a win. The people of Alabama are great, and the Republicans will have another shot at this seat in a very short period of time. It never ends!
A short period of time? Six years is a "short time"?
This is a defeat for Trump and Bannon is devastating to Trumpism.
Moore is claiming there is vote fraud. My prediction is the host will say this is not a valid election. He's already taken the Trump message that the investigation is a fraud, so why not dispute this because the judge refused to accept defeat.
Kerry in a Landslide. LOL
This term will be to finish Simmon's term.
A president who'd all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library or to shine George W. Bush's shoes:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/
White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday dismissed the president's smear as a misunderstanding because he used similar language about men. Of course, words used about men and women are different. When candidate Trump said a journalist was bleeding from her "wherever," he didn't mean her nose.
And as is the case with all of Trump's digital provocations, the president's words were deliberate. He pours the gasoline of sexist language and lights the match gleefully knowing how it will burst into flame in a country reeling from the #MeToo moment.
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
Kirsten Gillibrand wants the big chair but can't play the big boy's game.
A president who'd all but call a senator a whore
I don't get it. "Begging for contributions" and "do anything to get them" would reasonably describe half of the members of Congress.
If anything, it's relatively restrained for Trump.
I don't get it.
Please WP, I know you have a working brain....do anything? how about sucking on his you know what....my wife who worked in sales got it immediately and called him a pig....rather restrained for her. LOLOLOL
It's not sexist language. Attributing sexual connotations in this case requires an assumption of double-entendre, and it's simply not justified because none of the phrasing nor choice of words have even a hint of it.
Trump is a pig but the only reason you'd find outrage in that tweet is because he IS a pig, and you imbue meaning based on your opinion of him. He's not a pig because of what he said in the tweet.
It's not sexist language.
Your opinion is duly noted and I disagree.
Post a Comment