Preemptive preemptive strike?

So, critics of the President argue, the President is "acting guilty" because he continues to deny wrong doing and continues to attack the Mueller investigation.  The logic is that he is attempting to preemptively delegitimize Mueller, in order to cast doubt on all of the horrible criminal charges that are sure to come.

But if denying wrongdoing and attacking people is a sign of guilt, then most certainly the same logic must hold true for the three stooges of the Intelligence agency, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey. Even Donald Trump appears amateur in comparison to these three as it pertains to demanding innocence and declaring themselves above accusation. Not even the President can match the constant barking at the moon about how much damage to the country will be garnered by simply assigning an inspector general to look into these issues. 

Let's be clear here too. The President has endured four different investigations that have been going on for upwards two years. So far there is nothing from any of these investigations to disprove the President's demand that there was "no collusion" and that the investigation into Russia/Trump collusion is little more than a "witch hunt".  Let's stop to consider that he has not had a day of being President that has not had the cloud of an "investigation" over his head. He is the only President in history to ever come into office being investigated, and there seems little factual evidence provided by anyone that this investigation was started (and continues) for good reason.

On the flip side, the Brennan, Clapper, Comey complaints are that any investigation at all is not only unnecessary, but also would lead to a wide variety of concerns that include fundamental damage to the country, a constitutional crisis, widespread anarchy in the streets, and quite possibly a Zombie apocalypse. They couldn't possibly be any more hysterical as it pertains to their demands that the inner workings behind the Trump investigation "not" be looked into.

Again, this is a key point that demands repeating. The President has been investigated by four different entities, and so far nothing has come up to make us believe that there was ever any good reason to investigate Trump and his Administration. The President would just like these investigations to end with a report of whatever "findings" were uncovered over the past two years. This is entirely different from the Intelligence stooges to be sending out requests to Senators to "stop" attempts to have anyone look into their possible wrongdoings, along with a wall to wall media appearances, demanding how awful it is that anyone is considering looking at whether or not the intelligence community was acting properly and ethically.

The argument continues to be made that nobody, including the President, is above the law. This has been proven by the fact that the President has been under investigation. But if nobody is above the law, then that would also mean that our intelligence community is also not above the law. The American public deserves to understand that everyone (not just the President) can be taken to task, investigated, and held accountable for whatever wrongdoings are found. That means following up on what appears to be very strong suggestion that there was partisan, unethical, and possibly even criminal behavior by our intelligence community.