"The apportionment population results released by the Census Bureau are strikingly different from the population evaluation estimates released just months ago on December 22, 2020," the GOP members wrote. "Remarkably, the differences benefit traditionally blue states – which gained population compared to the estimates – over red states which tended to lose population compared to the estimates."
They added: "For example, New York was estimated to have a population of 19,336,776, but was attributed an apportionment population much greater than that of 20,215,751, a difference of nearly 900,000 individuals. Likewise, states such as New Jersey and Illinois experienced large population increases of hundreds of thousands of individuals compared to the December estimates, while states such as Arizona, Florida, and Texas experienced large decreases from the December estimates."
So apparently Texas was supposed to gain three seats instead of two and New York was supposed to lose two seats instead of one. There are other tangible differences that led to other changes in the final results, and every last one of them benefited blue states at the expense of red states?
So what does the Census Bureau, have to say about it? Well apparently they deferred?
"When our staff contacted the Census Bureau on the morning of the release with questions about the apportionment count, they were referred by Census officials to the White House for questions," they told Raimondo.
The Republicans continued: "Yet the statute is clear: it is the Secretary of Commerce who reports the apportionment count to the President, not the other way around. Referring our staff’s questions to the White House about the results produced by the Census Bureau is entirely inappropriate, and raises questions about the level of White House involvement in the process."
In theory, the White House should have nothing to do with how the Census Bureau counts the numbers, and certainly should not have anything to do with the final decisions on which states gain or lose congressional seats. But quite obviously they did, or the Census Bureau would not have deferred questions about these changes to the White House.;
This appears to be another example of Democrats trying to stack the deck in favor of their side, because they cannot win fair and square.
53 comments:
"When our staff contacted the Census Bureau on the morning of the release with questions about the apportionment count, they were referred by Census officials to the White House for questions," they told Raimondo.
The Republicans continued: "Yet the statute is clear: it is the Secretary of Commerce who reports the apportionment count to the President, not the other way around. Referring our staff’s questions to the White House about the results produced by the Census Bureau is entirely inappropriate, and raises questions about the level of White House involvement in the process."
everything that democrats do is about power.
they always place their elbows on the scale of justice to favor their side.
when they are in power the scale of justice points north and south.
now they are trying to entrench their rule with the help of their benefactors, the elites, big tech and the FAKE NEWS media.
ONLY power matters
Ch/Scottie says:
This appears to be another example of Democrats trying to stack the deck in favor of their side, because they cannot win fair and square.
James says:
When I hear a Trump supporter talk about winning fair and square I have to laugh.
Ch/Scottie didn't mention this:
Former Attorney General Eric Holder, meanwhile, raised another theory as to why some states showed counts that departed from last year's estimates, according to the Washington Post. He said that former President Trump's attempts to add a citizenship question to the census may have lowered Hispanic turnout in right-leaning states with a large Hispanic population.
"I just wonder if it had the impact of suppressing the count," Holder said.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0F8SthRpsQ0/WWTRia57qVI/AAAAAAAAJbM/O0U7GQzGu2Y_ESYOYSXmy_eAuYDewqYqACLcBGAs/s320/hqdefault%2B%25284%2529.jpg
MEANWHILE, AND MOVING ON---
Politicalwire.com
Trump Gets Tested In Suburban
Texas
“Former President Donald Trump’s influence on the Republican Party will get its first official, post-presidential test Saturday, when 11 GOP candidates vie in an all-party special election to succeed the late Texas Rep. Ron Wright,” Politico reports.
“The contest, which also features 10 Democrats, one libertarian and one independent, will be held in a suburban Fort Worth district that wasn’t deeply enamored of Trump — he ran behind his statewide performance there in 2020, winning by just 3 percentage points. Due to the crowded nature of the field, it’s likely to end up in a runoff.”
Christie Says He’d Give Trump an
‘A’ Grade
Chris Christie told Fox News he would give Donald Trump’s presidency an A grade.
However, he added:
“There were some things that happened specifically at the end of the presidency that I think had some things that clouded his accomplishments.”
THAT'S knee slapping funny, Chris!
WHAT an understatement!
GOP Leaders Threaten Cheney
Ouster
“Top Republicans are turning on Rep. Liz Cheney, the party’s highest-ranking woman in Congress, with one conservative leader suggesting she could be ousted from her GOP post within a month,” Axios reports.
“The comments by Reps. Steve Scalise, the minority whip, and Jim Banks, chairman of the Republican Study Committee, carry weight because of their close relationship with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy — who is openly feuding with Cheney.”
Taegan Goddard comments:
"This is not about a policy disagreement. It’s all about defending Donald Trump and refusing to acknowledge the January 6 insurrection."
Former Attorney General Eric Holder, meanwhile, raised another theory as to why some states showed counts that departed from last year's estimates, according to the Washington Post. He said that former President Trump's attempts to add a citizenship question to the census may have lowered Hispanic turnout in right-leaning states with a large Hispanic population.
Former AG Eric Holder was likely trying to be snarky, Reverend.
This isn't a question as to how the counts took place, but how they suddenly changed at the last minute in multiple states that all just happened to favor blue states at the expense of red states.
If it was actually about Hispanics we would have expected New Mexico and California to have also taken the shaft. But they didn't. New Mexico and California are 1 and 2 or 1 and 3 (in terms of percent of Hispanics) depending on the source.
Of course Slow Joe fudged the numbers. People are fleeing NY like it's on fire. To only lose one House seat here is laughable.
Oh dear!
Rasmussen has Biden's job approval at
-4
Oh wait!
Reuters/Ipsos
+ 17
Economics/you gov
+ 11
Politico/Morning Consul
+ 23
GOP Seeks to Empower Poll Watchers
New York Times:
“As Republican lawmakers in major battleground states seek to make voting harder and more confusing through a web of new election laws, they are simultaneously making a concerted legislative push to grant more autonomy and access to partisan poll watchers — citizens trained by a campaign or a party and authorized by local election officials to observe the electoral process.
“This effort has alarmed election officials and voting rights activists alike: There is a long history of poll watchers being used to intimidate voters and harass election workers, often in ways that target Democratic-leaning communities of color and stoke fears that have the overall effect of voter suppression.”
JOE AND THE DEMS DIDN'T STEAL THE LAST ELECTION,
BUT THE GOP SURE ARE WORKING HARD TO STEAL THE NEXT ONE.
GOP Launches Cultural Attack on Biden’s Agenda
Washington Post:
“Key GOP voices are accusing Biden of engaging in a stealth attempt to reshape American life, trying to reframe their opposition to the plan away from dollars and cents toward the culture-war terrain n which they have recently been much more politically successful.
“No legislation has been written to implement Biden’s proposals, and … nothing in Biden’s blueprint would mandate that Americans attend free community college, drive electric cars or put their children in prekindergarten.”
Roger out did himself, wrong on economics/personal finance and math.
KansasDemocrat April 30, 2021 at 2:33 PM
Consumer Saving surged 21 %.
Americans are banking Stimulus Transfer payments.
Reply
Replies
Roger AmickApril 30, 2021 at 2:36 PM
They spent 79% on goods and services"
Actually the Wall Street journal article proves Roger wrong.
Good News is Illinois, California and New York have less say in the future.
thebradfordfile
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1388349910328745985
The FBI is raiding homes of Trump supporters whose only "crime" was attending a rally--nothing else.
America is a police state.
Joe's Storm Troopers
When is he going to let us know who murdered Ashli Babbitt at the peoples house ?
in cold blood
Ryan Fournier
https://twitter.com/RyanAFournier/status/1388494702761160710
10 years ago today, Osama Bin Laden was killed by a team of U.S. Navy Seals.
Never forget that Joe Biden advised against taking him down.
Joe's been wrong on every foreign matter he ever touched.
and that was when he still had a few marbles left.
The census was conducted by the former President Trump, not Sleepy Joe.
Candace Owens
https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1388203157432459265
Joe Biden is an illegitimate President who is— in true dictator fashion— using the Department of Justice to go after political dissidents.
another strong black leader the left despises
and she is right
Roger Amick said...
The census was conducted by the former President Trump, not Sleepy Joe.
Yeah, sleepy Joe and the White House changed their numbers and aren't supposed to. Try and keep up
C'mon Rog...
You can do better than that. Or can you?
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The census was conducted by the former President Trump, not Sleepy Joe.
Wrong again, stupid.
The Census Bureau conducts the census. It's part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, which is run by a Biden* hack. A Biden hack who, at the direction of one of Slow Joe's handlers, could easily lie about the numbers the year following when the census was conducted.
We all know that Joe is a pathological liar and plagiarist, so it stands to reason he's lying about this too.
You and Joe have much in common, alky. Both quite frail, both galactic fucking LIARS. I think Joe actually brushes his teeth though.
Weeks before the Trump administration announced it was cutting the 2020 census schedule short, career officials at the Census Bureau attempted to send signal flares about how that last-minute decision would lead to "fatal" data problems with the national head count and the perception of "politically-manipulated results."
Internal emails and memos, which were released this weekend as part of a federal lawsuit in California, show career officials trying to hold the integrity of the once-a-decade count together in the last weeks of July amid mounting pressure from the administration to abandon the extended timeline it had previously approved in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Shortening that schedule, a draft document dated July 23 warned, "will result in a census that has fatal data quality flaws that are unacceptable for a Constitutionally-mandated national activity."
With counting now set to end on Sept. 30, the revelations come shortly before federal courts are expected to decide whether to order the administration to keep tallying the country's residents through Oct. 31.
The administration says it is under pressure to meet the current legal deadline of Dec. 31 for reporting to the president those state population totals that are used to reapportion congressional seats among the states. Justice Department attorneys say the scheduling problem is for Congress to fix, and so far, while some lawmakers have introduced bills, they have not yet passed any new laws.
A hearing before U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in Northern California is scheduled to take place on Tuesday, the day after another hearing for a similar lawsuit based in Maryland was held Monday.
NATIONAL How Trump Officials Cut The 2020 Census Short Amid The Pandemic
Last week, the bureau's Census Scientific Advisory Committee unanimously recommended the timeline be extended as the bureau requested to "ensure a successful completion" in a way that's based on "scientific and methodological expertise."
"When the weather isn't right, we postpone the launching of rockets into space," the group of outside experts wrote in their recommendations for the bureau. "The same should be true of the decennial enumeration, the results of which will impact apportionment, redistricting, funding decisions, legal mandates and regulatory uses of decennial Census data over the next decade."
On Monday, the inspector general's office at the Commerce Department, which oversees the bureau, released a report warning of the risks to the accuracy and completeness of the count from speeding up the census schedule.
The inspector general's inquiry, which was prompted in part by NPR's reporting, also concluded that the decision to shorten the timeline was not made by bureau officials, who said they did not know who ultimately made that call. The inquiry has now expanded to include an interview request for Deputy Commerce Secretary Karen Dunn Kelley.
Bureau officials say they felt pressure by mid-July from the Commerce Department to hasten census field operations, according to the inspector general's report. Two officials told the internal watchdog group they think the now-blocked memorandum President Trump issued on July 21 played a role in the shift of the administration's position on whether census deadlines should be extended
That memo called for unauthorized immigrants to be excluded from the apportionment count, despite the 14th Amendment's requirement to include the "whole number of persons in each state."
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/20/914692254/census-could-look-manipulated-if-cut-short-by-trump-officials-bureau-warned
Joe's been wrong on every foreign matter he ever touched.
and that was when he still had a few marbles left.
I think his "best" was his idea to balkanize Iraq. That wasn't just stupid. That was "ALKY" stupid.
Yes those pesky poll watchers. You know the ones who observe the process from start to finish. Those same people who were told to go home so that Democratic ballot counters could continue unsupervised and told that they had to be 20 feet away in certain places. We watched as Democratic ballot counters locked themselves in room and covered all the windows to get away from poll watchers.
Give us the last good example, Reverend for when a Republican poll watcher has been formally accused of any voter intimidation, voter fraud, or anything of the sort?
This is just like the issues with the voting law in Georgia, which is providing way more supervision and regulations to county election officials. They HATE the fact that they will need to provide a vote count in a timely fashion (eliminating their ability to "find" late votes). They hate that they will be assisted by other ballot workers from other counties to assist when those other ballot counters finish in their own counties. They hate the fact that there is finally someone who can replace officials who continuously fuck things up.
Why are Democrats so afraid of following the rules and being held accountable for doing so, Reverend?
That memo called for unauthorized immigrants to be excluded from the apportionment count, despite the 14th Amendment's requirement to include the "whole number of persons in each state."
Well Duh, alky.
When the 14th was written it was intended to reflect actual American citizens. Those here LEGALLY.
Today we have 25 MILLION illegals here. They deserve neither representation or constitutional protection.
They deserve a trebuchet ride over the wall.
There is a long history of poll watchers being used to intimidate voters and harass election workers, often in ways that target Democratic-leaning communities of color and stoke fears that have the overall effect of voter suppression.”
Oh, you mean like two "New Black Panthers" standing at the door of a polling place in Philly with clubs?
Yeah pederast, those WERE democrats ready to beat the shit out of anyone not voting for 0linsky.
Funny... you can't cite a single example in that LOOOONG history.
"Yeah, sleepy Joe and the White House changed their numbers and aren't supposed to. Try and keep up"
Roger can't, it involves math.
The Constitution doesn't say that they have to be legal citizens to be counted.
The Republicans tried to overturn the election on January 6th and your worried about being replaced by beaners.
", you mean like two "New Black Panthers" standing at the door of a polling place in Philly with clubs?"
Wasn't that AG Eric Holder's "people"?
Today marks President Joe Biden's 100th day in office. It is a milestone that, given his advanced age and declining cognitive health, few expected him to achieve. Vice President Kamala Harris will have to wait a little longer to seize the power she so desperately craves.
Professional journalists and other deranged libs have already anointed Biden the most transformative president since FDR or LBJ. It must be really humiliating for Barack Obama. In praising Biden's first 100 days in office, however, the liberal pundits refuse to acknowledge the blood on the president's hands and the COVID-19 body count that continues to rise.
Although he promised to keep Americans safe from harm, Biden has failed to deliver. More than 165,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 on Biden's watch, at a shocking rate of about 1,650 per day. Biden's COVID-19 death toll is roughly equivalent to
3 Vietnams
38 D-Day landings
55 September 11 attacks
69 Pearl Harbors
982 Oklahoma City bombings
In just 100 days as commander in chief, Biden has presided over a body count equivalent to 2 Vietnams, 8 Pearl Harbors, and 10 September 11s, at a rate equivalent to a 9/11 attack every other day.
Biden failed to take responsibility for the deaths during his long-winded congressional address on Wednesday, in which he thanked politicians, but not health care workers, for helping Americans get COVID-19 vaccinations. He refused to credit former president Donald Trump and Operation Warp Speed, launched almost a year ago to the widespread derision of "scientific experts" who argued Trump's optimism was reckless and could get people killed.
Meanwhile, there is no telling how many people have died as a result of Biden's decision to halt the administration of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. The controversial decision was not based on science and needlessly terrified Americans, especially those already hesitant to get vaccinated.
Perhaps the comparison to LBJ, architect of the Vietnam War, is a fitting one after all.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The Constitution doesn't say that they have to be legal citizens to be counted.
The Second Amendment doesn't say anything about me needing a pistol permit here in NY, yet I do.
You see how that works alky?
For some reason it's only the LEFT who get's to manipulate constitutional amendments to their liking.
Why is that alky?
The Constitution doesn't say that they have to be legal citizens to be counted.
Section 1, Alky
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Even with the application of the most liberal counting and the Report issued by Neo-Socialist Biden, California and New York and Jamie's Illinois lost population and seats.
Section 1, Alky
You forgot the THWAP!!!
LOL.
Cali, stop it right now.
Pointing out how stupid Alky is , is unkind.
A recurring question in American constitutional law has been who is a citizen of the United States. One of the defining events in the years immediately prior to the beginning of the Civil War was the opinion (PDF, 261KB) of Chief Justice Roger Taney of the Supreme Court of the United States in Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393, 404-407 that African-Americans were not citizens of the United States.
After the conclusion of the Civil War the Congress took steps to address this ruling. In 1866 the Congress enacted, over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, the Civil Rights Act, 14 Stat. 27, ch. 31 (PDF, 97KB) which provided a definition of citizenship.
However, because there were concerns that the Civil Rights Act might be subsequently repealed or limited the Congress took steps to include similar language when it considered the draft of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Citizenship is defined in the first clause of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment as:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.
The amendment's language was drafted by the Joint Committee on Reconstruction. The language defining citizenship was not in the introduced version of the amendment (H. J. Res. 127), but, was moved by Senator Howard of Michigan on May 30, 1866. It was adopted by the Senate that day and later adopted by the House. The Senate's consideration of the Howard language can be found in volume 36 of the Congressional Globe, pages 2890 to 2897. The debate is available through A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation (PDF, 1.67MB).
The debate in the Senate was conducted in a somewhat acrimonious fashion and focused in part on the difference between the language in the definition of citizenship in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the proposed amendment. Specific discussion reviewed the need to address the problem created by the Dred Scott decision, but also the possibility that the language of the Howard amendment would apply in a broader fashion to almost all children born in the United States.
The specific meaning of the language of the clause was not immediately obvious. In 1884 the Supreme Court of the United States in Elk v. Wilson, 112 U.S. 94, held that children born to members of Indian tribes governed by tribal legal systems were not U.S. citizens. In 1924 the Congress extended citizenship to all Indians by passing the Indian Citizenship Act, 43 Stat. 253, ch. 233.
In 1898 the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, ruled that a child born in the United States to non-citizen parents was a United States citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment.
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/citizenship/fourteenth_amendment_citizenship.php#:~:text=Citizenship%20is%20defined%20in%20the,the%20State%20wherein%20they%20reside.
Apparently the alky's legal expertise is limited to Sec. 320.
LOL.
If Cuomo hadn’t killed all those grannies they wouldn’t have lost their 1 seat
REV, Roger is always so sure .
Until the facts point out how spectacularly wrong he is.
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
Even with the application of the most liberal counting and the Report issued by Neo-Socialist Biden, California and New York and Jamie's Illinois lost population and seats.
We here in NY had to lose one. Losing none would've just made it too obvious.
Ignored because it didn't prove me wrong
Personally I don't believe that President Biden is the same type of person. He replaced unqualified hacks appointed by the former.
Census workers across the country have told The Associated Press and other media outlets that they were encouraged to falsify responses in the rush to finish the count so the numbers used for determining how many congressional seats each state gets could be produced under the Trump administration. Census Bureau officials said such problems were isolated.
Census advocates were heartened Wednesday by President Joe Biden’s quick revocations of Trump’s order to produce citizenship data and the former president’s memo attempting to exclude people in the U.S. illegally from the apportionment count. The Biden administration also has pledged to give the Census Bureau the time it needs to process the data.
The Census Bureau also said Thursday that redistricting data it’s releasing later this year for states and municipalities to use in creating legislative districts won’t include information on citizenship or immigration status. It also said the agency is suspending all work on trying to produce the immigration status of U.S. residents for the census.
“President Biden’s swift action today finally closes the book on the Trump administration’s attempts to manipulate the census for political gain,” said Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, who argued against the legality of the apportionment memo before the Supreme Court last year. The high court ruled that any challenge was premature.
After the bureau missed a year-end deadline for turning in the apportionment numbers, it said the figures would be completed as close to the previous deadline as possible. Trump administration attorneys recently said they won’t be ready until early March because the bureau needs time to fix irregularities in the data.
There will be flaws, likely undercounts of communities of color and overcounts of whites, but “they will just have to ‘bake the best cake possible’ through identifying and correcting the errors they can find,” said Rob Santos, president of the American Statistical Association.
Trump’s four political appointments to the Census Bureau last year were denounced by statisticians and Democratic lawmakers worried they would politicize the once-a-decade head count. The Office of Inspector General last week said two of them had pressured bureau workers to figure out who is in the U.S. illegally before Trump left office, with one whistleblower calling the effort “statistically indefensible.” Then-Census Bureau Director Steven Dillingham ordered a technical report on that effort but halted it after blowback. He resigned this week after Democratic lawmakers and civil rights groups called for his departure.
The bureau’s new interim chief, Deputy Director Ron Jarmin, didn’t respond to a request for an interview. He will report to Biden’s new pick to head the Commerce Department — which oversees the Census Bureau — Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo.
Former Census Bureau Director Kenneth Prewitt said he’s optimistic the final product will be as accurate as past censuses, especially now that Jarmin is at the helm.
“They know how to do it right. It just takes time,” said Prewitt, who served in the Clinton administration.
Another former bureau director, John Thompson, said the exit of Trump’s appointees will help eliminate distractions to finishing the 2020 census, but the agency needs to hold a public forum to discuss what anomalies bureau statisticians have found in the data and what they’re doing to fix them ahead of the apportionment numbers being turned in.
U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, asked Biden to set up a nonpartisan commission to review the apportionment data to make sure it’s fair and accurate before it’s delivered to the House of Representatives.
“The Census Bureau faced a number of challenges with the 2020 Census,” Schatz said in a letter. “Some, like the pandemic, were beyond the agency’s control. However, the Trump Administration actively interfered with the agency’s operations.”
Despite facing pressures from their political bosses, the Census Bureau’s career staff, not political hacks, did a good job of resisting the Trump administration’s most questionable orders by coming forward when they found errors in the data without worrying about the deadline and by whistleblowing to the inspector general when they felt pressured to produce citizenship of dubious accuracy, according to Morial, Santos and Thompson.
“They deserve to be honored,” Santos said.
___
This story has corrected the first name of Rob Santos, instead of Ron Santos.
___
Mike Schneider on Twitter at https://twitter.com/MikeSchneiderAP
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-census-2020-9fcf5cac65553490f8544f74026189e7
I try to use non partisan news organizations of either side.
Unlike the gaslighted blog host I don't believe that the MSM is a deep state conspiracy organization.
any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive
Way to cut out the most important part, you fucking hack.
This proves you know nothing of the law and how contracts work.
Snort another oxy
But it is the Biden Administration that determined the apportionment count.
Roger Amick said...
If they actually manipulated the census Bureau they fucked up. Texas got two seats and California, the highest population state lost one.
Despite being the minority party they might get both sides in 2020.
Is Biden writing alky's posts like Goddard write's boswell's ?
And doesn't he realize people are leaving California to go to Texas, not the other way around ?
Must never leave his room.
When you're outdoors, wear a mask, don't wear a mask, whatever. Everybody should stop yakking about it.For chrissake, for the next couple of months just wear a mask and get yourself vaccinated. This is hardly a big ask. We'll crush the coronavirus by the end of June and then everything will be great.
I get tired of the folks who make a big deal out of masks, and people who refuse the the vaccine.
If they actually manipulated the census Bureau they fucked up. Texas got two seats and California, the highest population state lost one.
Despite being the minority party they might get both sides in 2022.
Roger Amick said...
When you're outdoors, wear a mask, don't wear a mask, whatever. Everybody should stop yakking about it.For chrissake
Yeah be like California and force everyone to mask up and lockdown. Over 60,000 dead. Oh wait, never mind that.
Just don't be like Florida and have any fun and keep your economy thriving.
They follow the science but whatever, don't look at them and just comply with Joe unless it's when he's not complying.
and roger reposts his gibberish
every word
he must have got lost
like Joe
ROFLMFAO !!!
Lol@Roger
"I get tired of the folks who make a big deal out of masks, and people who refuse the the vaccine."
Roger you are wrong.
You totally fucked up the "who is a legal" US citizen.
And now you advocate IF 🐑🐑 up now Thru June of 2021 all will be good.
Got science that backs it up?
for the next couple of months just wear a mask and get yourself vaccinated. This is hardly a big ask. We'll crush the coronavirus by the end of June and then everything will be great.
You mean like that 15 days to stop the spread we talked about 13 months ago?
Post a Comment