Sunday, July 31, 2022
This definitely applied to elderly men who share a studio room with a crazy man who thinks he was a beatle...
Is monkeypox the only global problem that can be solved by jerking off for two weeks or are there others?
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 30, 2022
After bragging up how well he handled his Covid experience...
Saturday, July 30, 2022
Now that Hispanics are voting Republican...
BREAKING: The Biden administration is starting construction on a border wall to stem the flow of future Republicans.
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 29, 2022
Friday, July 29, 2022
Irony, stupidity, or both? Do Democrats believe new taxes and new spending will "curb inflation"?
Literally anyone and everyone who thinks tax and spend reduces inflation |
So what do they decide to call this particular bill? The inflation reduction act? There is no real explanation as to how or why this will reduce inflation (that can only be done at the Federal Level). Nothing about this bill will come into play before the midterms. They will be able to show no tangible results.
An adult opinion on the Jan 6th hearing vs investigation
THE New York Times bewails the comparative snail’s pace of the Justice Department’s reported investigation of former president Trump and his advisers in schemes to overturn the result of the 2020 election. Seems prosecutors are so “apparently plodding and methodical” that they frustrate . . . well, it’s not exactly clear who is frustrated except for the Times and its fellow partisans. For all its rebuking of the former president’s tactics, the paper has adopted his “people are saying” schtick for broaching topics that are of more interest to the Times than to most people. In truth, besides Democrats, the January 6 committee controlled by Democrats, and the media allies of Democrats, no one is wondering whether or why the Justice Department’s investigation is lagging behind the committee’s.
As I pointed out over the weekend: The committee, by adopting a slick, television-production approach that suppresses such inconveniences as cross-examination and opposing perspectives, has managed, in the eyes of some, to create the illusion of a detective story constantly turning up new revelations. Despite its TV-drama presentation, the committee’s summer episodes have not altered our basic understanding of January 6.
Yes, some of the committee’s new details are titillating. And because we already know what this puzzle looks like when fully assembled, the committee’s fitting the pieces together week-by-week may project the appearance of progress. But overall, the story never changes.
By contrast, the Justice Department is expected to come up with something that is genuinely new: criminal liability.
In so doing, prosecutors have to account for facts that don’t fit the committee’s political narrative — e.g., Trump’s statement in his Ellipse speech that the crowd would be “peacefully” marching to the Capitol, which the committee continues to ignore as if it didn’t happen; and the fact that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick died of strokes that occurred after the riot, under circumstances where no causal connection between the riot and the strokes has ever been established, contrary to the committee’s disingenuous suggestion, repeated most recently last week, that he died of injuries sustained during the riot.
Unlike the committee, the Justice Department has to deal with such nuisances as judges, defense counsel, and cross-examination. In a criminal trial, if a federal prosecutor dared to point out, as the committee does with cavalier regularity, that witnesses have refused to testify based on their Fifth Amendment rights or lawful privileges, the judge would respond by declaring a mistrial due to government misconduct and referring the prosecutor for professional sanctions — because litigators well know that such assertions violate basic due process as construed by the Supreme Court for decades. Nor are prosecutors at liberty to allege without evidence that a suspect’s actions resulted in someone’s death; they know they have to prove it — unlike a partisan congressional committee, the Justice Department doesn’t get to float a grave accusation and impose on the suspect the burden to prove his innocence. Prosecutors can’t make unhelpful facts disappear by studiously omitting mention of them, and they can’t make up helpful facts for which they lack evidence.
Ahem... all too obvious to most of us. But not to those suffering from cognitive dissonance and who actually believe they are witnessing a real hearing or even a real trial.
McCarthy goes on to talk about the fact that Democrats are trying to suggest that Jeffrey Clark pressured Georgia officials to not certify the state results (which also plays into the Georgia investigation by a partisan county prosecutor with a grand jury that cannot indict anyone). As McCarthy points out the facts don't correlate with the allegations and last (but not least) the letter was never sent.
But that is another common theme. Besides ignoring facts that undermine their narrative or bring up allegations that they cannot prove - the committee loves to literally bring up stuff that didn't actually happen!
In fact, the committee is rather stacked with this sort of "evidence". Things that "almost happened" or things that Trump was "going to do before he was stopped" by some hero or heroin looking out for the country's best interest. They refer to draft letters never sent, proposals never implemented, etc, etc... These are things that might make your average everyday TDS enhanced liberal get aroused when the committee brings them up, but they are also things that did not actually happen would never be part of a court case.
In other words, much of the committee's hearings and findings are completely useless to an actual prosecutor. A prosecutor cannot call people to testify who "claim" to have been motivated by Trump to do something. A prosecutor cannot call people to testify about things that didn't happen. The prosecutor cannot bring in people to testify about what they believe Trump thought. The committee's bombshell witness (Hutchinson) has a snowball's chance in hell of ever seeing an actual witness stand in a real trial.
At the end of the day, McCarthy is correct. Democrats are providing theater for the faithful 5% or so of the population who are very interested in this. But this sort of fake hearing is probably working against the DOJ as they try to continue their own investigation.
Thursday, July 28, 2022
Opps! Someone let the cat out of the bag!
At least some honest people are willing to say the "R" word!
Officially, the National Bureau of Economic Research declares recessions and expansions, and likely won’t make a judgment on the period in question for months if not longer. But a second straight negative GDP reading meets a long-held basic view of recession, despite the unusual circumstances of the decline and regardless of what the NBER decides. GDP is the broadest measure of the economy and encompasses the total level of goods and services produced during the period.
Another Democrat shows their hypocrisy!
Well you can have it one of two ways. An objective measure of a recession (long thought to be two quarters of consecutive negative growth) or it can be subjective. But if you really want to make is subjective, then the only "opinion" that matters is the general public. Doesn't matter if Paul "clown" Krugman says it is not a recession, or if Slow Joe Biden argues that it is not a recession, or if the entire Administrative economic teams denies it, or if every liberal journalist or media whore falls in line with the no recession argument...Brian Deese, yesterday: "Two negative quarters of GDP growth is not the technical definition of recession.”
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) July 27, 2022
Deese, 2008: “Economists have a technical definition of recession, which is two consecutive quarters of negative growth.” pic.twitter.com/MzVk7drq3v
Wednesday, July 27, 2022
WaPo implies something about Trump and Garland that simply isn't true...
WaPo reports that the DOJ has been investigating Donald Trump as part of their 2020 election probe but also dishonestly implies that he has been "targeted" or is a "target".
More to the point, it is pretty much unheard of that an indictment would come from the Federal Government without a target letter being sent prior to the indictment. So if someone has received no target letter then they are generally not in danger of any indictments. While the WaPo article indicates that the DOJ is targeting Trump, there is no actual indication that such a letter from the DOJ has been sent or even being considered. To be clear, not every target letter ends up with a prosecution, but pretty much all federal prosecutions start with that target letter.
Samantha Bee "full frontal" gets canceled
Tuesday, July 26, 2022
Of course an official declaration of a recession is a moot point. Americans will decide for themselves!
The Conference Board’s index decreased for a third month to 95.7 from a downwardly revised 98.4 reading in June, data Tuesday showed. The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a decline to 97.
The steady weakening in sentiment risks causing consumers to cut back on discretionary purchases at a time when the economy is struggling for momentum. Inflation has dented confidence and forced the Federal Reserve to pursue aggressive interest-rate hikes geared at curbing demand.The American public will ultimately decide what sort of state they feel the economy is in. That will not be up to the Biden administration, the bureau of economic nonsense, or anyone else to decide. Republican will pounce on the two consecutive quarter benchmark and let the Democrats decide if they want to defend this economy to the American electorate and put themselves in a position to be seen as even more out of touch.
Yes Virginia, two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth is a recession!
Bracing for impact: Even if Thursday's GDP report shows a second consecutive quarter of negative growth, you won't hear the Biden admin using the R-word.
— Jacqui Heinrich (@JacquiHeinrich) July 24, 2022
The Council of Economic Advisers is redefining what a recession is...🤔https://t.co/HHBYJKqP5V pic.twitter.com/gecR93vPPj
Monday, July 25, 2022
The last three generic ballot polls don't look too good for Democrats
Polling Data
Poll | Date | Sample | Republicans (R) | Democrats (D) | Spread |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average | 7/5 - 7/22 | -- | 44.9 | 42.4 | Republicans +6.3 |
Trafalgar Group (R) | 7/20 - 7/22 | 1085 LV | 48 | 40 | Republicans +8 |
Emerson | 7/19 - 7/20 | 1078 RV | 45 | 44 | Republicans +1 |
Rasmussen Reports | 7/17 - 7/21 | 2500 LV | 49 | 39 | Republicans +10 |
What I can tell you is that in 2020 YouGov overstated Democratic support by about seven points (yes you read that correct - they were off by seven point). Politico overstated Democratic support by four points. Rasmussen has both overstated and understated GOP support over the years, but has been closer than most. Emerson (showing a small GOP lead) has been pretty dang close the past couple of election. This is the first time I have seen Trafalgar do generic ballot polling.
Either way... Democrats are in trouble if the GOP comes out with any sort of popular vote win.
So if you accept the premise that the RCP average of two and a half point is probably pretty solid, that would suggest that the battleground districts are probably more like a five point lead for the GOP. This would also be consistent with some specific battleground polling that has been done. A four or five point advantage in the battleground districts would not bode well for Democrats and probably would suggest a much larger GOP gain than some are expecting.
Ha! How true!
Want to practice identifying cognitive dissonance in others?
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) July 25, 2022
Tell a Democrat the Jan6th hearings cleared Trump by producing no evidence of wrongdoing except "should have done more," which is a generic truth that applies to Pelosi just as much.
Then watch their faces.
Don't worry - liberal prosecutors are making up for it by charging non-violent conservative protesters with "parading" and sending them to jail!
In the wake of last month's recall vote ousting San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin from office, left-wing prosecutors in Democrat-run cities from Los Angeles to Philadelphia are facing growing backlash for soft-on-crime policies as violent crime spikes devastate local communities.
Many of these progressive prosecutors are funded by left-wing megadonor George Soros, who has spent the last several years injecting tens of millions of dollars into local DA races nationwide, backing candidates who support policies such as abolishing bail, defunding the police, and decriminalizing or deprioritizing certain offenses.
Well we can all rest soundly knowing that at least peaceful conservative Americans are learning their lessons about carrying signs too close to government buildings. Even as we seem to be waving the rest of the criminals in the front door by never charging them regardless what they do.
Carry an American flag at a Trump rally. Expect to be held in jail without bond. Get charged with murder in one of these cities, you are likely free to go the same day as long as you pinky swear to come back for your hearings. Hey, a couple of these criminals released with no need of bail for arrests have even used that free time to murder other people and commit more crimes! Not too surprisingly some have gone after the same victims as a means to intimidate and punish them for calling the police!
But hey... as long as these criminals vote Democrat, they are needed on the street. Lest their ballots cannot be filled out party line for Democrats, harvested, and dropped into boxes.
Sunday, July 24, 2022
Watch the sidebar countdown....
Impeach Merrick Garland - these are the consequences of his politicization of law enforcement
In an honest country a special counsel would be a year or so into things by now...
I have serious doubts that a son of a prominent Democrat will face any charges here. While the crimes are obvious (same crimes as Paul Manafort who was sentenced to nearly four years) the difference is the political party association. Manafort was associated with Republicans (and worse yet an associate of Trump). That alone makes him a criminal....So far I have flu-like symptoms. I am displaying the common strong cough, headache, sore throat and an overriding desire for a special counsel in the Hunter Biden investigation. https://t.co/nrJMSqriMO
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) July 24, 2022